Introduction to the normal distribution | Probability and Statistics | Khan Academy

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 апр 2009
  • Courses on Khan Academy are always 100% free. Start practicing-and saving your progress-now: www.khanacademy.org/math/stat...
    Exploring the normal distribution
    Watch the next lesson: www.khanacademy.org/math/prob...
    Missed the previous lesson?
    www.khanacademy.org/math/prob...
    Probability and statistics on Khan Academy: We dare you to go through a day in which you never consider or use probability. Did you check the weather forecast? Busted! Did you decide to go through the drive through lane vs walk in? Busted again! We are constantly creating hypotheses, making predictions, testing, and analyzing. Our lives are full of probabilities! Statistics is related to probability because much of the data we use when determining probable outcomes comes from our understanding of statistics. In these tutorials, we will cover a range of topics, some which include: independent events, dependent probability, combinatorics, hypothesis testing, descriptive statistics, random variables, probability distributions, regression, and inferential statistics. So buckle up and hop on for a wild ride. We bet you're going to be challenged AND love it!
    About Khan Academy: Khan Academy offers practice exercises, instructional videos, and a personalized learning dashboard that empower learners to study at their own pace in and outside of the classroom. We tackle math, science, computer programming, history, art history, economics, and more. Our math missions guide learners from kindergarten to calculus using state-of-the-art, adaptive technology that identifies strengths and learning gaps. We've also partnered with institutions like NASA, The Museum of Modern Art, The California Academy of Sciences, and MIT to offer specialized content.
    For free. For everyone. Forever. #YouCanLearnAnything
    Subscribe to KhanAcademy’s Probability and Statistics channel:
    / @khanacademyprobabilit...
    Subscribe to KhanAcademy: ruclips.net/user/subscription_...

Комментарии • 188

  • @SomebodyOutTh3re
    @SomebodyOutTh3re 3 года назад +88

    Guys I found this amazing explanation in another video's comment section, I hope it helps!
    "It took me a while to understand this and had to rewatch this video a few times, but essentially there are ground rules for calculating standard deviation. Standard deviation is saying something like "Math test scores averaged 92 'give or take' 3 points".
    So 92=mean, deviation=3 (the give or take number), so 92-3 and 92+3 means that 68.26% of all students score fell within 89-95 (92-3=89 or 92+3=95). this is "1 standard deviation".
    This video is using the ground rules for calculating standard deviation. Since standard deviation is a mathematical formula, the existing ground rules dictate that you have a 68.26% of all test scores to be within 1 standard deviation (3 points in my example).
    So for 2 or 3 standard deviations, you use the same formula above, but instead of 3, use 6 (2 stDevs) or 9 (3 stDevs)
    1 stDev = 68.26% probability (give or take 3 points)
    2 stDev = 95.44% probability (give or take 6 points)
    3 stDev = 99.7% probability (give or take 9 points)
    NOTE: The 68.26%, 95.44%, 99.7% are existing rules used for normal distribution and apply to any example."

    • @azwell45
      @azwell45 2 года назад +1

      so 1 std shows us how 68.26% of people deviated from the mean? and when std increases, i mean the points we add and subtract, we see more probability. ty

    • @DendrocnideMoroides
      @DendrocnideMoroides 2 года назад

      what video was it (at least which channel)

    • @jkjoker777
      @jkjoker777 Год назад +3

      @@azwell45 not quite, the 68% is the probability of selecting one entity from a sample and that entity falling within 1 sd of the mean.

  • @adnanhossain3152
    @adnanhossain3152 8 лет назад +298

    i dropped out of engineering and joined business school just so i dont ever have to see that GOD DAMN INTEGRATION SIGN... but... we meet again. my old foe!

    • @Hertha_Ambambi
      @Hertha_Ambambi 8 лет назад +9

      Lol,,, u have to get used to it

    • @blownspeakersss
      @blownspeakersss 7 лет назад +26

      Real business is all about mathematics and statistics, especially finance!

    • @GabrielleDaway
      @GabrielleDaway 6 лет назад +6

      I honestly feel your pain

    • @leofelippe100
      @leofelippe100 4 года назад +4

      I know what you are felling, failed calc 2 twice myself

    • @anurag7058
      @anurag7058 4 года назад +2

      THAT INTERGRAL SIGN LITERALLY RUNS THE UNIVERSE SO NO SURPRISE THERE

  • @MidnightFreefall
    @MidnightFreefall 3 года назад +12

    I just wanted to say that I'm taking statistics while studying to be a veterinarian. The course at uni is very brief, nothing goes into too much detail on why certain things work the way they do. This playlist is a godsend. I love maths, and I love how passionate you are about these topics. Thank you for helping me study!

  • @basschipper7258
    @basschipper7258 4 года назад +16

    Ten years later, still relevant. Sal you are a gift from God

  • @druca
    @druca 7 лет назад +62

    I find it very effective that you *repeat* the same ideas over and over again! It reinforces them.

    • @evalsoftserver
      @evalsoftserver 7 лет назад

      ITS NOT SO HARD , THE MATHAMATICINS USE WORD TO MAKE IT HARD! DONT PAY TOO MUCH ON THE EXACT WORD THE USE IT WILL JUST CONFUSE YOU MORE.
      JUST REMEMBER THING TO EQUAL THINGS LIKE HOW YOU MIND SEE IT EX. SET TO SETS , POINT
      TO POINTS IF ITS GEOMETIC IN FORM, NUMBER TO NUMBER , IF
      IT ARITHMETIC, OPERATION TO OPERATON EX. NULTIPLICATION CAN BE MATCHED TO ADDITION BY A EXTRA STEP!
      FOR EXAMPLE HE KEEPS SAYING " DISTRIBUTION" THATS JUST LIKE SAYING LIKE A FORM , OR SAME FORMULA ! ''
      SO IN YOUR MIND SUBSTIUTE DISTRIBUTION FOR LIKE FORM , NUMBER OR SHAPE
      IT WILL MAKE UNDERSTANDING ALL THIS A LOT EAZIER !

    • @evalsoftserver
      @evalsoftserver 7 лет назад +1

      HE IS REALLY VERY GOOD , BUT TO MOST PEOPLE ITS OVER THEIR HEADS,
      HE ASSUMES MOST VIEWERS CAN FOLLOW WHAT HE IS SAYING
      HE SHOULD HAVE STARTED THE VIDEO WITH A DISCLAIMER STATING SOME FOREKNOWLEDGE IS REQUIRED ABOUT
      DISTRIBUTION , AREAS UNDER CURVES , TRANSFORMATION THEORY
      LIKE MATRIX LINEAR ALGEBRA . AND INTERGRAL AND DERIVATIVE CALULUS
      , WITH EXTRA FOCUS ON MULTI-VARIATE CALCULUS , AND
      COMBINATORIAL MATH LIKE MIXING ALGEBRA , TRIG, CALCULUS TO SEE
      UNIQUE SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS !

    • @slowsatsuma3214
      @slowsatsuma3214 7 лет назад +14

      KoDi-CIoner-TV u high bro ?

    • @alexting827
      @alexting827 5 лет назад

      @@slowsatsuma3214 Lol

  • @alexkuligowski4092
    @alexkuligowski4092 5 лет назад +2

    The connection between the normal distribution and the cumulative distribution function just clicked! Thank you! I see the normal distribution as the distribution to explain most natural phenomenon if we use the law of large numbers to arrive at the central limit theorem. The cumulative distribution function is nothing more than the sum of the probability from negative infinity to a given X of interest. After seeing how this comes together the way we use the cdf to obtain an interval of probability along a continuous distribution is super slick.
    Last note: I've always wondered why we have an index of pages for the normal distribution. After the small note on how difficult the integral would be of the equation for a normal curve it makes so much more sense why these tables in all statistics books I've ever looked in the back of.
    Cheers!

  • @hussainrangwala1078
    @hussainrangwala1078 3 года назад +1

    I wish I had watched this video earlier during my engineering.. Mr. Sal Khan take a bow!! this is how you teach something to someone..

  • @McNoat
    @McNoat 4 года назад +4

    I very much enjoyed the transformation of the formula into different "forms". I think this helps to reduce the fear that comes (for me) from looking at so many symbols and makes it a bit more palpable.

  • @tseringangle21
    @tseringangle21 5 лет назад +4

    Thank you! It made so much more sense now. That graph representation and manipulating equation made it more easy to understand reason behind all.

  • @lobsterofficial1967
    @lobsterofficial1967 3 года назад +1

    11 years later and you made me understand what the normal distribution is all about for my Biomed Technology class thank you Khan

  • @khanacademy
    @khanacademy  15 лет назад +6

    the normal distribution is a class of distributions that have the same basic shape but different means and std deviations. Human height is probably close to a normal distribution with the mean around 5'6 (somewhere in between men and women average).

  • @donnajoe4442
    @donnajoe4442 5 лет назад +6

    The only slight mistake was at 15:55. You were supposed to enter 10 and not 100 i.e e^-1/2(x+5/10)^2. This was a good explanation.

  • @randompotato258
    @randompotato258 8 лет назад +39

    there is a small fault when you wrote down the fonction to integrate where the mean is -5 and the standard deviation is 10 you wrote ((x+5)/100)^2 the right expression would be ((x+5)/10)^2 or (x+5)^2/100) otherwise you have (x+5)^2/(the standard deviation)^4

    • @spacetime_wanderer
      @spacetime_wanderer 6 лет назад +1

      Yes. You are right. I had to scroll so much to find this comment. Wonder why it's not been noticed by so many.

    • @wedeldylan
      @wedeldylan 4 года назад +1

      Yep. Big boy made a mistake

  • @akanshaw
    @akanshaw 4 года назад +2

    Glad I decided to watch this video before starting to study for test !! Helped a lot !

  • @layallooloot9735
    @layallooloot9735 5 лет назад +31

    Can't believe this video is 10 years ago 😭😂💔

  • @TheMorttt
    @TheMorttt 10 лет назад +254

    12 minutes in and i'm more confused than I was 12 minutes earlier

    • @Dingus7696
      @Dingus7696 7 лет назад +3

      skip this one video it's not that necessary, the rest of them are probably what you need

    • @evalsoftserver
      @evalsoftserver 7 лет назад +6

      ITS NOT SO HARD , THE MATHAMATICINS USE WORD TO MAKE IT HARD! DONT PAY TOO MUCH ON THE EXACT WORD THE USE IT WILL JUST CONFUSE YOU MORE.
      JUST REMEMBER THING TO EQUAL THINGS LIKE HOW YOU MIND SEE IT EX. SET TO SETS , POINT
      TO POINTS IF ITS GEOMETIC IN FORM, NUMBER TO NUMBER , IF
      IT ARITHMETIC, OPERATION TO OPERATON EX. NULTIPLICATION CAN BE MATCHED TO ADDITION BY A EXTRA STEP!
      FOR EXAMPLE HE KEEPS SAYING " DISTRIBUTION" THATS JUST LIKE SAYING LIKE A FORM , OR SAME FORMULA ! ''
      SO IN YOUR MIND SUBSTIUTE DISTRIBUTION FOR LIKE FORM , NUMBER OR SHAPE
      IT WILL MAKE UNDERSTANDING ALL THIS A LOT EAZIER !

    • @KatoOnTheTrack1
      @KatoOnTheTrack1 6 лет назад +2

      If you can't learn from Khan it's all bad for you

    • @TiffTheTyrant
      @TiffTheTyrant 6 лет назад +5

      moe.so.jiggy what is the probability of understanding after 12 minutes

    • @shannonmiller1910
      @shannonmiller1910 6 лет назад

      Me too. Thanks. I just laughed out loud.

  • @plaxen1
    @plaxen1 8 лет назад +2

    Loved it! thank you..... different topics really helped to connect the dots!

  • @JawadKhan1
    @JawadKhan1 10 лет назад +6

    Thanks for explaining in detail.

  • @edithmambiri7089
    @edithmambiri7089 5 лет назад +2

    Thanks for clearing my confusion, well explained.

  • @pradeepknal
    @pradeepknal 12 лет назад +1

    thanks a ton for all the teachers and staff team at Khan Academy!

  • @Yo-yx8wo
    @Yo-yx8wo 7 лет назад +1

    great explanation, is always interesting try to see where the math formulas come from

  • @AmadeoArguelles
    @AmadeoArguelles 4 года назад

    Excellent, thank you for the explanation and the information. I referred the file to my students to make some tests related with Normal Distribution

  • @JoshMolina
    @JoshMolina 12 лет назад +1

    Thanks to Sal and staff at Khan, I'm able to throw down with the quants at the bank. Thanks guys!!!

  • @sasamuraki
    @sasamuraki 13 лет назад

    wow, that part of linking normal distri to 'nothing is impossible, but the probability matters' is awesome.. deep...

  • @achillesarmstrong9639
    @achillesarmstrong9639 6 лет назад +2

    the best video in this topic on youtube site

  • @Jonny-uu7wf
    @Jonny-uu7wf 9 лет назад +2

    I find these videos really helpful. Got a statistics exam tomorrow, been revising off these for the past few weeks. This video is not very good though. Really confusing.

  • @matthewa6881
    @matthewa6881 7 лет назад

    this is deep.
    How are pi and e and chance related in this way!
    My mind is blown right now.
    I discovered the norm dist. in uni in like 2007 but only now have a greater appreciation for it.
    Just number plugged in the past. This mathematical model is truly beautiful to me.

  • @Zartas17
    @Zartas17 12 лет назад

    Very informative and well presented. Thanks Khan Academy!

  • @Dermie
    @Dermie 14 лет назад +1

    Thanks. Well explained!

  • @sajn0001
    @sajn0001 14 лет назад

    Thank you very much Mr Khan.
    The best tutorial ever.

  • @NGChannel97
    @NGChannel97 5 лет назад +76

    who else is watching these videos a day before the exam in 2019?

  • @masoodghasemzadeh
    @masoodghasemzadeh 15 лет назад +2

    Excellent tutorial. Simple and clear.
    Just as feedback : It's gonna be perfect if you speak a bit slowly, specially for non-english viewers.

  • @Joe.0oo
    @Joe.0oo 5 лет назад

    yay for watching in December of 2018... video is still relevant/helpful nearly a decade later lol I just wish my professor would let me use excel on my exam tomorrow hahaha

  • @bambangeko221
    @bambangeko221 2 года назад

    Excellent explanation of Normal distribution. Thank you very much.

  • @scienceblossom6197
    @scienceblossom6197 5 лет назад

    Really nice explanation. Thanks.

  • @sumairakhan9608
    @sumairakhan9608 2 года назад

    Thanks, you always save my life.

  • @mohit01985
    @mohit01985 14 лет назад

    great work! thank you.

  • @harveyspecter3361
    @harveyspecter3361 5 лет назад +1

    I think for statistics in general we should make a big distinction between statistics for business, social sciences, medicine and statistics/ probability for engineering, mathematics, physics and econometrics.
    Clearly, many students here are the former and do not need to know most of what is being talked about here.
    (coming from a student with a bachelor in both business and econometrics)

  • @ravanabrahmarakshas4263
    @ravanabrahmarakshas4263 5 лет назад

    very good. very clear. excellent. thanks.

  • @AdemsPerspective
    @AdemsPerspective 9 лет назад +11

    You are the saver Khan! Saving my ass every time! Thanks dude

    • @mmaking8664
      @mmaking8664 8 лет назад

      +Abdurrahman Köksal every time man this guy is the best

  • @talentokie
    @talentokie 15 лет назад

    I wish i had youtube when I was in school...wud have learned a lot of things better.

  • @muzic29
    @muzic29 13 лет назад

    thanks so much for this.

  • @arunprakash4368
    @arunprakash4368 8 лет назад +2

    lesser the time more the knowledge ,its very easy to understand ,,

    • @artrocks8392
      @artrocks8392 8 лет назад +1

      +Arun Prakash Unless one requires more time to acquire the knowledge. Not all intellects function in the same way... thankfully.

  • @indianarchangel
    @indianarchangel 9 лет назад +28

    The video was very good but please try to talk in a more coherent manner. It makes it hard to follow when you switch between concepts every 10 seconds.

    • @kevinsurposa363
      @kevinsurposa363 8 лет назад +4

      +indianarchangel I like it that way :)

    • @evalsoftserver
      @evalsoftserver 7 лет назад +2

      ITS NOT SO HARD , THE MATHAMATICINS USE WORD TO MAKE IT HARD! DONT PAY TOO MUCH ON THE EXACT WORD THE USE IT WILL JUST CONFUSE YOU MORE.
      JUST REMEMBER THING TO EQUAL THINGS LIKE HOW YOU MIND SEE IT EX. SET TO SETS , POINT
      TO POINTS IF ITS GEOMETIC IN FORM, NUMBER TO NUMBER , IF
      IT ARITHMETIC, OPERATION TO OPERATON EX. NULTIPLICATION CAN BE MATCHED TO ADDITION BY A EXTRA STEP!
      FOR EXAMPLE HE KEEPS SAYING " DISTRIBUTION" THATS JUST LIKE SAYING LIKE A FORM , OR SAME FORMULA ! ''
      SO IN YOUR MIND SUBSTIUTE DISTRIBUTION FOR LIKE FORM , NUMBER OR SHAPE
      IT WILL MAKE UNDERSTANDING ALL THIS A LOT EAZIER !

  • @Timmytimmy123123
    @Timmytimmy123123 4 года назад +3

    15:54 There is a mistake here.
    Sal wasn't supposed to square the entire ((x+5)/100), he was just supposed to square (x+5) since the deviation was already squared from 10 to 100.

    • @ankurm26
      @ankurm26 4 года назад

      That's right

  • @rp3291
    @rp3291 3 года назад

    Thank you Sir!

  • @dckc3333
    @dckc3333 3 года назад

    very helpfull video!!

  • @vdmur7952
    @vdmur7952 3 года назад

    Thank you!

  • @MrAwesomeAsian22
    @MrAwesomeAsian22 13 лет назад

    @dobromir2102 hello Dobromir, it is 2 years since you have seen this video, but i hope you still have your positive attitude for Statistics! anyways, to find the video you are looking for press Ctrl and f, and type in the keyword you wish to search for. In your case, i used standard deviation as my key words, and it brought me to the statistics section. In the section there is an intro to normal distribution. under that, you have z-score. Hope i helped! reply if you have any questions.
    -Wasfi

  • @rodrigocbv
    @rodrigocbv 6 лет назад

    great video!

  • @norwayte
    @norwayte 15 лет назад

    You have the gift.

  • @Person514cs
    @Person514cs 15 лет назад

    That's very interesting

  • @archakasandeepiniacharya7106
    @archakasandeepiniacharya7106 3 года назад

    Terrific

  • @killjoy95590
    @killjoy95590 10 лет назад +2

    "for those of Y'all" heeeeeeeeeee haaaaaaaaaaa! Giddy up cowboy! 2:12

  • @dissapoment5547
    @dissapoment5547 4 года назад

    Wow this is deep

  • @TheSupernastee
    @TheSupernastee 9 лет назад

    ty

  • @george4746
    @george4746 5 лет назад

    Some tutorials show frequency on the Y-axis while some show frequency. Which one is correct?
    And how does the area come into the scene?
    I am all confused.

  • @NaserNazary
    @NaserNazary 13 лет назад

    Also I find it very helpful thanks khanacademy.
    where can I fnd more videos?

  • @IsaacC20
    @IsaacC20 13 лет назад

    1:35-2:00: In a probability distribution of a continous variable, shown by the normal distribution curve, is it impossible, not correct, or simply not the job of the normal distribution curve to approximate the probability of obtaining a discrete integer value (i.e., a number on the x-axis)?

  • @aashijain6858
    @aashijain6858 6 лет назад

    Can you make a video explaining applications of lognormal distribution.

  • @nurulshazwani6807
    @nurulshazwani6807 3 года назад

    I watch these videos an hour before my exam.

  • @Jakers2009
    @Jakers2009 15 лет назад

    Sal... super video by thw way... Dont mean to get involved but maybe this guy should do some research into the example you said about your atoms falling through a chair if he wants an extreme example... What I am interested in is you continuing this idea into the central limit theorem and also some of the financial examples you said you may do.... I am starting to see how this could be used to value options or the intrisic value of an financial instrument....

  • @tiff2794
    @tiff2794 8 лет назад +3

    Hello! I was wondering what the y axes would be labelled on the normal distribution graphs. I understand the x axes would be the number of standard deviations, but i dont know what the y axis would be

    • @123zozey
      @123zozey 8 лет назад +1

      +Tiffany K
      Hi Tiffany,
      First of all, the X-axis isn't really the number of standard deviations. It is whatever your variable is. (The standard deviations are just shown on the x-axis.) The Y axis would be basically whatever the other variable is that you are measuring. So if you were measuring how many finger taps a person can do in 20 seconds, then the time (in seconds) would be on the X-axis, and the finger tapping would be on the Y-axis. Hope that made sense!
      Zoha

    • @enok82
      @enok82 8 лет назад

      +Zoha Shoaib +Tiffany K Actually i would suspect that the X axis be the amount of taps and Y axis how many times that amount of taps acheived i.e. after 1000 trials (and sore finger tips) 120 of those trials ended up with 97 taps. Then a point or bar would be placed at X=97 and Y=120.

    • @actuallyactuary2787
      @actuallyactuary2787 8 лет назад

      +Tiffany K
      X-axis is the variable, whatever you wish to find probability for. Say you wanna find probability of range 5-15, then 5 & 15 would be on X-axis
      Y-axis represents the probability density function.

    • @hung89341
      @hung89341 8 лет назад

      is it also means y-axis = height of the normal distribution?

    • @vineethmenon2260
      @vineethmenon2260 7 лет назад

      The x axis will be variable that you are considering to sample and measure whereas the y axis is the probability distribtion for that particulat variable which is detected from the standard formula.

  • @witheredways4198
    @witheredways4198 Год назад

    using the free program u have made i can add all the info in i need but this doesnt take intocount the z chart i have been given so i am not sure if i am missing something

  • @selenaburke2956
    @selenaburke2956 5 лет назад

    What happened to the 2 around 8:50 when you rewrote the equation?

  • @BeGunNer
    @BeGunNer 13 лет назад +1

    Is the Cumulative Distribution Function a Logistic Function with carrying capacity 100% or does it just look like one? I am not sure, because it seems to copy the typical shape, but I can conjure up no substantiation as for why it should be that way.

    • @victor_peral
      @victor_peral 2 года назад

      It is preferable because of the difficulty of solving the integrals and exponents by the normal formulae , so we go by the CDF of negative infinity of a number to that number and the difference of both probabilities give a workable or logical probability

  • @AdrianWildgoose
    @AdrianWildgoose 13 лет назад +1

    I have a question that i need help with. The question goes...."The scores on a statistics examination are normally distributed with a mean of 60 and a standard deviation of 10. Calculate the following probabilities:
    A. The lielihood that scores will be less than 50.
    My question is for the z- score ...would it be (z--1) thus P(z

    • @victor_peral
      @victor_peral 2 года назад

      Since the question is on probability and not the z score , calculate for the probability between -0.1 and 50 then subtract the probability of 50 from the probability of -0.1 to get the answer

  • @alexandardimitrov5064
    @alexandardimitrov5064 4 года назад +1

    I am confused what is the difference and connection between Normal Distribution and the Probability Density function then?

    • @victor_peral
      @victor_peral 2 года назад

      Probability density function shows the graphical distribution of outcomes , you can have probability density functions of both the binomial and normal distributions.

  • @Poggle566
    @Poggle566 11 лет назад

    I see this was 4 years ago but I feel compelled to say that the negative values are a deviation from the mean and not a negative height.

  • @odaneswaby8714
    @odaneswaby8714 4 года назад

    at 15:50 you should divide by the standard deviation and not the variance....... And Good video by the way

  • @TheFunkiGuy
    @TheFunkiGuy 6 лет назад

    More Confused?
    Yes
    More Research?
    Yes

  • @Tehcarp
    @Tehcarp 15 лет назад

    If you did statistics in high school, this might come up.
    Don't worry though, if you spend more than half an hour on it, or work backwards in the maths you need to understand (try an elementary stats textbook from your local library) this will quickly come under your power to manipulate.
    Watch some more videos!

  • @THE16THPHANTOM
    @THE16THPHANTOM 12 лет назад

    this is still super difficult and its the most important important one.

  • @Kieranlovesunicorns
    @Kieranlovesunicorns 7 лет назад

    dude kinda sounds like Paul Scheer....also kinda love his voice #asmr

  • @cloud-tutorials
    @cloud-tutorials 6 лет назад

    If many process in world approximate to Normal Distribution, how do before hand we know mean and variance?

  • @indiansoftwareengineer4899
    @indiansoftwareengineer4899 5 лет назад

    Why this introduction part is after exel exercise in playlist order.
    This must be put before exel video.
    Videos in playlist are not sorted according to time.
    Introduction to normal distribution would have come before normal distribution exel video.

  • @panos4386
    @panos4386 3 года назад

    what do you mean i cant use the diagram for a simple number...for example for x=5 ...p(5)= is on y axis following the diagram...it gives you the relative frequency of your measured samples.....why i need to take an area from 4.9 to 5.1 acording to your example?

  • @saurabhmahajan4459
    @saurabhmahajan4459 5 лет назад

    So a normal distribution is the one whose pdf is symmetric about its mean ! Is that a correct simplification of the definition?

  • @bpirat
    @bpirat 10 лет назад +44

    would have been so good if you just kept focus on the topic and did not deviate constantly

    • @thermie
      @thermie 9 лет назад +14

      *standardly

    • @suuup4711
      @suuup4711 7 лет назад +1

      variably*

    • @evalsoftserver
      @evalsoftserver 7 лет назад +2

      ITS NOT SO HARD , THE MATHAMATICINS USE WORD TO MAKE IT HARD! DONT PAY TOO MUCH ON THE EXACT WORD THE USE IT WILL JUST CONFUSE YOU MORE.
      JUST REMEMBER THING TO EQUAL THINGS LIKE HOW YOU MIND SEE IT EX. SET TO SETS , POINT
      TO POINTS IF ITS GEOMETIC IN FORM, NUMBER TO NUMBER , IF
      IT ARITHMETIC, OPERATION TO OPERATON EX. MULTIPLICATION CAN BE MATCHED TO ADDITION BY A EXTRA STEP!
      FOR EXAMPLE HE KEEPS SAYING " DISTRIBUTION" THATS JUST LIKE SAYING LIKE A FORM , OR SAME FORMULA ! ''
      SO IN YOUR MIND SUBSTIUTE DISTRIBUTION FOR LIKE FORM , NUMBER OR SHAPE
      IT WILL MAKE UNDERSTANDING ALL THIS A LOT EAZIER !

    • @jhonatanhernandez3568
      @jhonatanhernandez3568 5 лет назад

      you could say, his deviation was pretty... standard

    • @harveyspecter3361
      @harveyspecter3361 5 лет назад +1

      He is not doing that, it is just that he is explaining stuff you don't need to know when you do a bachelor without advanced mathematics.

  • @rakeshk6799
    @rakeshk6799 7 лет назад

    We are making use of Cumulative Distribution Function so that we don't have to evaluate the integral of p(x), but how are we finding CDF? Isn't that the same integral with limits changed?

    • @victor_peral
      @victor_peral 2 года назад

      He didn’t dig into finding CDF analytically because there is an excel function for it

  • @ramzi45
    @ramzi45 11 лет назад

    I have a question:
    the P(x) reperesents the probability density/probability and P(x) goes from 0 -> 1
    and we have a normal distribution/gaussian distribution where every x have a p(x)
    The question is why do we have in the p(x) axis values higher than one??? (I even use the G.D formuala and get values greater than 1)
    Thank you

    • @victor_peral
      @victor_peral 2 года назад

      It doesn’t go from 0 to -1 it goes from -infinity to any value of x

  • @bambinarm4071
    @bambinarm4071 10 лет назад +2

    ...because not EVERYONE understands one way, hence the ENTIRE point of the Khan approach. You're asking him to do what classrooms do. If that's the case, then why watch a redo of what you experienced in class -__-

  • @drewmetra
    @drewmetra 6 лет назад

    This is a great video, y'all haters weren't paying attention.

  • @chrisaltec2992
    @chrisaltec2992 6 лет назад +18

    Lots of confused people on here. If you jump into this video without watching the videos leading up to this, and have a weak grasp of maths, of course you're not going to understand.
    I didn't understand every single part, but know why (because I haven't even learned integration in calculus and didn't watch all the preceding videos on the topic), so I accept that as a limitation and took away what I could.
    Don't skip to chapter 10 without reading the first 9 chapters and expect to know what's going on!

  • @MissNORY22
    @MissNORY22 11 лет назад

    when you go to his channel you will find playlists based by subjects so go to statistic playlist

  • @vincenzoimparato7077
    @vincenzoimparato7077 6 лет назад

    So, why it's not possible to calculate a precise value x? Analitically I have only to put the value x in the formula, but geometrically I can see whay value y take the curve for the value x. Why I'm oblied to take an interval?

    • @saalank
      @saalank 5 лет назад

      You can but any exact value you may pick would have the probability of zero. That is the difference between discrete and continuous functions. In a discrete function there is (for example) 2 and only 2, no 2.0000000000000001 or 2.0000000000000000000000000000001. But those silly numbers do exist in a continuous function. There are in fact more than infinity(aleph one) of them between any two intervals.

  • @debendragurung3033
    @debendragurung3033 8 лет назад +2

    I have been here a 100 times but still find myself alienated.
    I went all the way to find what gaussian function is, and finally come back to find it is actually e^-(sqrt x) and not e^-square x, that I should look for.
    Also, Does P(x) here means (mean + sigma.x)......

    • @theproofessayist8441
      @theproofessayist8441 6 лет назад

      The Gaussian Integral which actually requires polar coordinate change of variables double integral integration to solve is integral(e^(-x^2)). Double integrals are learned in Calculus 3/Multivariable Calculus or Vector Calculus.

  • @mandylu6558
    @mandylu6558 3 года назад

    Can't believe I'm learning this at 8th grade

  • @bnglr
    @bnglr 5 лет назад

    what is P(x) in the excel?

  • @YouPokerAcademy
    @YouPokerAcademy 10 лет назад

    Salman, I'm working through some math for my own channel and I was wondering if you could help me understand this:
    If I am 1% to win, and I do 50 trials, am i 50% to win one of them? It seems like a normal distribution question so I'm posting here.

    • @adenpower249
      @adenpower249 6 лет назад

      Yes but it's not a normal distribution question. The probability * the number of trials is the number of trials is the number at which you can expect to succeed.

    • @victor_peral
      @victor_peral 2 года назад

      You have 50 percent of winning all the trials not one of the trials . For I trial you will choose 1 out of the 50 and do a binomial for it

  • @anhaonguyen912
    @anhaonguyen912 5 лет назад

    If somebody find he's speaking too fast. Just adjust the playback speed to 0.75 (or whatever that suit you), you would find it more easier to follow up.

  • @dauletbukanov9703
    @dauletbukanov9703 6 лет назад

    How is it that the standard deviation is not the same as the average distance from the mean? my brain is just not able to accept it

  • @mohsinali236
    @mohsinali236 6 лет назад

    Give a normal distribution which
    Mean is 40
    SD is 6
    Find the X assume a value
    1 below 42
    2 above 27
    3 between 42 and 51
    Plz tell me

  • @niconikko
    @niconikko 12 лет назад

    Is this the longest video??

  • @DivinityFaith
    @DivinityFaith 12 лет назад

    I believe you are somewhere to the right of the normal distribution graph, probably somewhere near 6.9 billion, if we were to make such a graph for "helpful people".

  • @sairamemon4230
    @sairamemon4230 5 лет назад

    i have a question that why normal distribution is called normal? may i know the answere please

  • @sherridonlyons-verse172
    @sherridonlyons-verse172 5 лет назад +2

    I usually love your examples and look for them, but you thoroughly confused me on this one.

  • @watsonholmes1750
    @watsonholmes1750 7 лет назад +20

    I really dont understand why a med student needs to know this

  • @TheSunshineRequiem
    @TheSunshineRequiem 5 лет назад

    okay, for those ppl who are confused with this, you need to understand about pdf and cdf first, the normal distribution is just a bell curve pdf, it happens to be very common in our universe.

    • @TheSunshineRequiem
      @TheSunshineRequiem 5 лет назад

      standard normal dist. is just normal dist. where the mean is set to 0, and variance set to 1.

  • @liamhoward2208
    @liamhoward2208 4 года назад

    What does the height (y-variable) of the probability density function measure?

    • @ghost_2
      @ghost_2 3 года назад

      y axis shows probability

    • @victor_peral
      @victor_peral 2 года назад

      It measures probability of a certain outcome of x axis

    • @liamhoward2208
      @liamhoward2208 2 года назад

      I thought the y-axis showed likelihood which is different from probability. Also, isn’t the probability of one specific value equal to zero? That’s why for continuous distributions like the normal we have to use a range.

    • @victor_peral
      @victor_peral 2 года назад

      @@liamhoward2208 likelihood of occurrence is same as probability .the probability of an exact occurrence is zero only for a continuous outcomes it isn’t zero when an outcome is discreet like the case of a dice or fair coin . Most natural events don’t have predictable outcomes that’s why a range around the expected outcomes is solved for

    • @liamhoward2208
      @liamhoward2208 2 года назад

      @@victor_peral I am speaking in terms of continuous data. I just always thought that the height of a normal distribution technically would be the probability of a single x-value occurring. However, that idea doesn’t line up with having to find probabilities with ranges. For example, if I plug a single x-value into the normal distribution formula I will get the height of the curve which is a single point on a continuous line. There would be no area under that curve because a 2 -dimensional line doesn’t have area. That’s where I’m confused. Probability is area. Therefore likelihood and probability cannot be the same