On a ton per mile bases, the drivers income would be so minimal per ton because of the huge productivity of these huge trains, yet we do away with the driver. We are all doing what we are doing on our amazing planet so that people have work, to feed families and live a reasonable life, but huge corporates do have no regard for that, they say they do, but its just BS. Why not do away with top end executives on huge incomes, and keep the frontline team employed and everyone benefits along the way.
Pretty much, though to be fair automation would allow us to work on other things. This is why everyone should be given a base pay to live, without the costly cancer that is the owners and execs. Machines do our work, and we all live better (but only if we get rid of the top).
As someone who lives in the U.S. it is weird to the point of creepy seeing the locomotives with the windshield blanked out and no one on board. It’s almost as if the locomotives are coming to life.
Funny what pops up in my feed.... right now Im typing this at Tea tree camp on the Rio Rail mainline at 176kp. I am part of the construction crew currently replacing turn outs and replacing whole sections of rail and formation arounf the floodway bridges etc. Some of this line is untouched since when it was laid around 40 something years ago so its a "little overdue" for a refit. We work up to 3 meteres from any live track and having these things coming past at up to 80kph was super intimidating at first! Each train is carrying ore worth around 4 million Australian dollars and we see around 30 something a day pass by heading to the port. Great video Ive captured loads of footage myself and will put something together for the huge amounts of people commenting positively on this video. Cheers
"Río Tinto" ("Red River") is a company that was born in Spain (specifically, in the province of Huelva, in western Andalusia), since the river of said name ("Tinto") carries the colored waters red, due to the copper that is in the place where it is born, and that was exploited by said company until 1954.
Copper metal cannot be it. It has to copper compound which usually have green colour like copper suphate. Copper ores have green colour blue colour like malachite. If Rio Tonto in span was coloured red then it was because of iron ore like Hematite of Limonite.
I know a driver up ther who got a six month contract to drive ten years ago "while they did the transition" to remote operation. He is still there driving locos there ten years later. I would like to point out that BHP had a runaway train a few years back which had no driver. The accident cost the better part of a billion dollars what with destroyed track, wrecked wagons and locos and most expensive of all a few weeks lost production of iron ore while the line was closed. Still all that aside a great video and stunning scenery. These places are really remote and a permit is needed to drive there, truck tyres being essential.
The driver was off the train checking something and brakes were not set properly due to air fault. Train moved off and with down gradient all the way to coast could not be stopped. It was deliberately derailed.
Not really. Since the driver was inspecting a fault, if the train was unmanned they would still have had to send a crew out by road. This would probably take hours out there. It is not a simple economic equation.
@@andrewblake2254 Any malfunction on automatic train while en route costs you more money than in train with driver - assuming that driver is skilled enough to repair it by himself. It means that more pressure is put on service crews and more money is spent on maintentance in depot. Same discussions are running in my industry - how much would it cost if crewless ships would brake down in the middle of the ocean?
I watched many train videos for entertainment and to learn about freight trains and railroading in general. I've watched lots and lots of them. I vote the shot from 10:51 to 13:04 the best shot I have ever seen!
Pretty mind-blowing to see autonomous freight trains in Australia! The locomotives look and sound a lot like the ones seen in my home country, the USA. Great catches! Greetings from the United States!
@@Hugo5t1gl1tz All states are now connected by standard gauge but we don't have the loading gauge to import U.S. locos , check out studio.ruclips.net/user/videoVnwEeyFties/edit for examples of our diesels .
It's mind blowing how far technology has come, I asked about Autonomous Trains no-less than 4 years ago during an imaginative stupor while writing, I was told by a few people that it was either stupid, impossible, unsafe, and completely unnecessary, while others said it'd be for special types of trains, or for Japan's High-Speed network, yet, here we are automating Iron, in Australia of all places.
I don't know why you're impressed. Of all vehicles, a train is the simplest to automate. It moves in a one-dimensional world (vs 2 for automobiles and 3 for airplanes), with guaranteed rights of way.
@@strnbrg59 Just because its the "simplest" doesnt mean its "simple". These are different words. There is still a shit load of programming when it comes to automating trains.
Pretty amazing to to think a computer program is in charge of these huge ore trains. This takes remote operation of locomotive in switching to a whole different level. I was thinking how could a program take into account the feel and experience of an actual engineer to account for load, track, braking and grades but I guess if you have all these variables (non-variables I guess ) standardized the program can do it’s thing. I can definitely see this being a great option for long, non hazardous cargo in not densely populated isolated territory.
Trains that have ptc (not sure if it's that exact system) are pretty much autonomous. Ptc is something like adaptive cruise control. The train will automatically speed up and slow down, compensate for hills etc.
We've had driverless commuter trains on a light railway in London since the mid-1980s I think. I'm amazed that they aren't more widespread, given the continual push to cut costs.
@@anotherfreediver3639 I’ve heard some commuter rails in USA cities have the capability but the “optics” of having a driver-less train they feel doesn’t go over well with the public. I think many systems use the approach mentioned where a driver sits at the controls as a back-up in case anything goes wrong. Maybe a lifelike mannequin could suffice? 🤔
@@johnphillips592 Thank you for taking the trouble on behalf of everyone who has watched and enjoyed the whole reporting. It was lovely. You should divide the number of games of Freecell played by the number of people who have watched the video. It think the ratio will _definitely_ be less than one ! ✊🏼🤘🏼🤗
Truly awesome! Really unique to see parallel trains running like that too. Sounds scary, being driverless, but quite safe in the grand scheme, considering the location and that even with human operators, trains of that size will never stop quickly and they legally have the right-of-way in most if not all countries. Trains are already one of the most routine transports, being on rail and completely controlled by signals when not in yards. Even with a human in the seat, it's quite procedural, something perfect for computers to handle, when you're willing to trust them haha. Even collision detection could be far quicker performed by sensors and a computer (same reason we see it in pretty much all modern cars). Thanks for the fantastic video! I'm sure it took quite a bit of effort to get out there :)
I'm guessing that these rail lines are exclusively Rio Tinto so they can have it all automated without any issues. I don't think you would be able to do that on US mainlines.
I disagree for us here in America, I want a human in the seat. Rio Tinto has very little crossings and what people are track side are workers, a random railfan that's it. This line is perfect for computers to run on, set train length each weighs more or less the same, with no towns. in America our trains are never the same every time. Rio Tinto and a guy on youtube (David Rayner) made great videos how the system works. But for other parts of the world this is not going to work as well, too many variables.
This might help. It's a video about the system from Hitachi, and includes shots of the Perth control room - ruclips.net/video/Fyeb8AQig3w/видео.html - the trains have lots of safety features including collision avoidance and real time video. And this is a driver setting up a train at the port to return to the mining area - ruclips.net/video/BDbfDUqPm8E/видео.html . It seems that the trains run up to the designated mine under full auto, get loaded and return. The only place with real drivers is at the port.
I am sure it is loaded with computerized electronics but it was possible 100 years ago with standard railroad signal track circuits and electromechanical devices.
Miss those days,Rio Tinto and BHPIO,first it was two men then one now none,when you spend so much time in the early days with one other person in the cab you just have to get on with each other,not dissimilar to a marriage.You have done a marvellous job John,i can nearly smell the spinifex.
@@MilwaukeeF40C yes had turns cooking and washing up,if things went wrong,hot wheels,bearings,emergency application, the driver did the walking, otherwise possible seperation.
This level of Tech can now been seen in the ELK Valley in British Columbia, thanks to CP Rail cutting jobs while increasing the hazards to the general public. The sensors may give the remote operator all of the real time data about the train's operation, but not the forest and grass fires that are started by the trains, something that a pair of mark 1 eyes balls do from the cab.
@@Mikishots Yeah it's kind of hard to see something go wrong with the train by eye from 1500 miles away. but hey, as long as it hurts the rail unions it's worth it (assuming you're a rail exec)
Well I think it would be unlikely that a driver of such a train could witness a spark flying from a 500 ft train, landing in some grass and smouldering into a fire, while driving a train at the same time but perhaps the Canadian train drivers have superior vision. In the UK. it's just a relief when the drivers are actually in the train and not on strike.
@@richardhasler6718 those trains average about 2.4km in length with the record being 7.3km. A human driver can’t even see the end of the train they are driving. And even if they see an obstruction on the rail ahead of them they can’t stop in time. Hence the dependence on remote sensors - which can be monitored 1,500 miles away from the Pilbara in a central facility in Perth.
Great video John and with all the money they save not paying drivers they could spend some refreshing the paint on their locos as they look appalling. Thanks again for the nice video.
Thanks for the upload, it brings back lots of memorys of when i was machining ore car wheels at Port Hedland for Mt Newman mining in the lathe pit, very enjoyable times.
Hi I used to work on this rail line back in the 90’s Great times I could still identify many locations Been up and down that track many times Thanks for the memories I remember when those locos were brand new We watched them being unloaded at the dock and taken to seven mile workshops for the bogie installation… Cheers
On our mine we have fully autonomous dump trucks driving all over the place. They are a pain in the arse! 😆 But interesting as more complicated than trains as don't run on rails and have to interact with manned vehicles in a constantly changing environment.
They're a bit safer on the haul road after the water cart's been through. Now if we could have automated graders we won't have grader drivers bitching and moaning over the CB to stay off the fucking windrows
Sounds like the rails were freshly ground in most of those shots. Cool stuff! On long runs like that, the biggest hazard is boredom and sensory hypnosis. I have witnessed napping engineers more than once. I gave up the ass callouses many years ago for less boring, dangerous and terrifying jobs. Ever been in a train wreck? I have, several. They are really loud.
I worked on the two perma nent line camps and just to see the rail grinder at work during the night in winter with ahalf moon was mind blowing, i called the scene the lonely Dragon serpent, the pilbara has always been a magical place for me.
There are so many things a good mechanic knows from feel, smell, touch and hearing that a computer cannot know and dosent have sensors attached to that this is insulting that someone could possibly think this is a good idea or is saving money. Only a corporation could be this greedy and detached from reality.
These trains have bankers to get them over the hills so they can then roll down to the coast. These are manned as I know a driver. He tells me that these "unmanned" trains often carry a driver even if they are controlled remotely.
Thankyou mr. John Phillips videos. Very different views of passing of two trains running through two railway tracks into one direction in parallel as twins single lines. Thankyou for this very good surprise. Carry-on your greate efforts.
My understanding is that there is a human supervisor watching them for the whole trip. They can do an emergency stop remotely from a Perth control centre
No doubt that they can stop that train remotely. But if something is going wrong and building up to a potential accident how would they know apart from continous surveillance by camera all along the length of the train .
@@ianmontgomery7534 No, they are not driven by humans in Perth. The train controller does nothing more than they used to - operate the signals to tell the train (was once the driver, now the train) when to start and stop. Based on the signals, the train drives itself. Eg; If the signal 20kms ahead is at stop, a driver can choose to keep going at full speed, stop at the signal, and wait for it to clear or he can slow down now and if the signal has cleared before he gets there he won't have to stop, or he can stop anywhere between here and there (say, on a downhill grade rather than the uphill grade the signal is on to make starting off easier) and wait for it to clear (I say 'signal' but it's all in the cab so yes, you can see a signal that's 20 kms away). The train controller nor the program that runs the train can't do that. All the controller can do is set the signal to stop and the train will continue at track speed until it gets to where braking would normally occur to stop at that signal.
@@jkardez4794 They don't. No one is looking at the view from the camera. The only time they do is when an impact sensor on the loco alarms so they look to see what the train has hit (usually a cow) but whatever it was, they only see it after the event and then decide whether or not to stop the train. There was a time around 2016 while they were still testing it that a driver of an empty train rolling down the hill towards where the Robe train was filmed noticed that a man who had obviously decided to kill himself had laid his neck across the track. The driver slammed on the brakes and stopped before he cut the man's head off but had that been an AutoHaul train, no one would've known until the driver of a Robe train (still manned to this day because Robe will not spend the money to AutoHaul their track) came along and then only if it was daylight.
As a lad (1970's), my neighbor that worked in the Northern MN (USA) iron ore mines told me he ran the trains in the mine area with a remote control that was housed in a backpack he wore. I didn't believe him...
He was right I worked at a RR USSteel I started in 1973 by late 70’s early 80’s off come the backpack a box about 10 to 12 inches wide to 4 inches deep 4 inches tall placed on a belt rite in front of your belly he would stand on the ground and could see some lights on one of the four corners of the engine and the roe of different colors lights would tell him what the engine was about to do stop,reverse,forward or pumping air. He would throw switches and sometimes he would have another person on the other end of train with a radio telling him what to do
INTRAMOTIV in St Louis, MO is currently working on autonomous self powered rail cars. The cars are battery powered and when connected together in a train they all work together forming a "locomotiveless" train. Still in development but targeting this very market.
as long as there is a balance between automation and manned work then I don’t see a problem The problem I have with automation is when company’s abuse it to kick out the middle guy to save a few extra coins
Just watched your video, very well done and informative. It used to be empowering to see a person in charge of all that machinery and to think of what people are capable of. This makes people servants to the machines, fueling and repairing them as needed. Until they can work out how to do that also.
Quick question - at about 13:00 mark you can see what looks like rail that is laid inside of the actual rail the trains are running on - is that some sort of derail prevention? Thanks and great video!
It’s more for the safety of the driver. These tracks are a majority in the middle of nowhere. It’s hard to do crew changes and if something happens and the drivers are stranded or a medical emergency they are hundreds of miles away from help
An excellent video indeed. There's something that's hard to describe, maybe a kind of realisation really, that comes over a person as they see these things in action for real. I worked in the Pilbara for a few weeks in an elevated area, next to the open valley of Karijini National Park, where I seen the constant stream of autonomous trains arrive off the main north/south line and take the large circular loop below the loading stations where they fill the trucks one by one and gradually loop around to take their place alongside the main line back north once again, moving Australia to China, one truckload at a time. They take around 3hrs to complete a loading phase before setting off north to port once again. On cool still mornings, once the final trucks had been loaded and despite being a few km/miles from the train, we could clearly hear the engines pick up from 3hrs or so idle and load up followed by the clinking of every truck's connection to the next as they took up the slack. Most interesting and impressive. Automation and AI will no doubt continue continue to hone this process and remove more humans from the entire process, including the mining. I hope China will continue to remain a willing customer...
@@FrogandFlangeVideo I live in Melbourne and was on a caravan trip around Australia , have visited there several times before , my first RUclips video was on these trains
@@johnphillips592 My brother referred your video to me. Coincidentally I had just weekes ago did a little dive into the rail action in the Pilbara, Cool stuff happening ther. Thanks John. James.
Absolutely insane. Suppose there's an obstruction on the track? One of those old GE clunkers catches fire? How long until a Rapid Response Team could get out to it?
Ive flown my drone over the tain ans had gotten some aweome videos and photos. When i drove darwin to cairns i had left my car unattended for 5 mins. And in that time my drone and camera that were on the back seat were stolen. If i ever see my videos uploaded onto youtube ill be going after whoever uploaded them.
I wonder if they are running Cattron or Control Chief systems? I worked on installs for Cattron and was a CMO for years with short line rail. Them 2% grades are making those ladies sweat a little :) I am so fortunate to have been a composite mechanic and a working CMO for the years I did that and I am so fortunate to not do it still, I miss it but it was some hard work. Thanks for the vids bro, made me smile and have good memories!
That was fun. I wonder why they sat there for 5 hours with the engines running? Perhaps they could've aired up the consist 45 mins before departure or switched off two engines and left one engine running to maintain brake pipe pressure. I dunno seems like a waste of fuel but who am I but a RUclips nobody with just another opinion?
@@johnphillips592 The lead locomotive is the one responsible for the air brakes, both in controlling them and building air. The second two are only there to assist in power and braking. Now it might be different in autohaul but I doubt it. I don't know if these are setup with auto start/stop systems on them I would guess yes. They would shutdown base on water temp air temp etc. The problem I see with that and this might be the reason why they are left running is Autohaul can't predict when they will be on the move again, some guy or girl clicks start on the computer at the dispatch office and the train goes, so there be no time to start the second two. From what I have seen the engines are setup to go at any moment. If you list to the clips in your video John like at 5:25 these ES44DCi's are not in low idle (happens when you put the reverser in neutral to save fuel and start the auto start/stop system) they are in high idle ready to go. at 15:20 when the sun is shirring through the cab and no one is in it that to me... just scary reminds me of the movie Unstoppable.
theres switches to switch , ect.ect. to turn them off , theres no-one on the train to do all that , and in the overall scheme of things , they dont use a lot of fuel just sitting there idling
In America, there is no iron mining. There is refining as there is more than we need. I can only guess that this ore is going to the ones who need it, China. Amazing footage. Thanks for sharing it. I truly enjoyed it.
That's not true, though iron mining is certainly waning in the US with mines continuing to shutdown (this has been the pattern with every type of ore). But there are still a handful in operation, producing millions of tons annually. Not just refining, but actual mining. Though there are also reclamation efforts from tailings, that might be what you're referring to.
These driverless trains are intimidating as heck! Like just getting close to them with their sheer size is enough to say “nope”. But everything Rio does is big. Then you see them running parallel in the same direction and your like that’s just freaky!
@@johnphillips592 Always a "point" to riding something - instead of walking - as who in their right mind (or in the mind of anything else) would WALK 1600 miles?
I am the director of operations at Rio Tinto Australia and I can assure you that while this video is genuine the captions are completely misleading. Our trains have one of the best safety records anywhere in the world, including Japan. And if you consider the tonnage we are the #1 in the world. In our country, it is completely illegal to operate trains without an operator. All of these have 2 operators functioning in a fail-safe mode. Further more, these locomotives also have dual and triple redundant controls.
I remember in NZ on the seventies NZ Railways instituted the use of radios in shunt operations and the union furore that followed. On a lengthy goods train at the marshalling yard suddenly a ground shunt staff of 3 or 4 replaced by 1 guy with a radio. But that's just the start. Next it was single man train crews losing the loco assistant. Elimination of the rear guards van staff (read caboose) And then lose of the single ground shunt man when the driver escaped the shunt loco controls for a remote hand set on the ground. Bring back memories people's? That's how big business rolls with the how can we squeeze the last ounce from that bottom dollar. Chime in peeps from around the world..
7:48 Two very long trains, just sitting there for 5 hours, because Rio Tinto thinks somehow that this is cheaper? That's 5 lost hours, for each train... but with people in control, they could have called ahead, at least to find out if they can move under caution? Also - people can predict and react to the unexpected - computers can only respond if what has happened is in the programming, to begin with?
David Rayner has a video showing how it’s done - he’s obviously one of the drivers or was one. He set it all up, locked the loco cab, radioed up the control folks and they sent the train on its merry little way. Unto about half an hour ago I had no idea such a system existed - I’m from Scotland and we have nothing similar. It’s amazing to see such a massive train trundle away on its own!
@@Highland_Moo Yes, I retired in Dec 2019 after 10 years at Cape Lambert. BTW, I was in Scotland in 2018 went the system went 'live'. Absolutely beautiful place. On my last shift before I went, I drove a train from Tom Price to Cape Lambert and when I came back 6 weeks later, I was told I'd never go there again and I didn't. Spent my final year in the yard and on the Robe line. At least we at Cape Lambert had the Robe line. No other depot still drives on the main line at all. Very sad.
A remote operator (sitting at a desk in a skyscraper in Perth 1300 kms away) tells it where to go. It uses power and braking as needed to follow the speed limit and signals. However I'm not sure if the AutoHaul makes instantaneous decisions based on gradient and speed etc, or whether there is some sort of pre-programming of the power/braking needed to climb or descend down tricky sections of the line. In theory it can detect when a collision has happened and bring the train to a halt. But my understanding is it won't see a car parked on the tracks and apply brakes before a collision - not that it really matters for a train this heavy.
What I don't understand is why they don't just use bigger ore cars ? I mean there must be a reason but wouldn't it be better to have a train with 150 large ore cars vs one with 300 small ones ? I'm thinking maintenance wise etc ? awesome video :)
@@johnphillips592 Good point, I thought with the rail’s being used by heavy industry they might have allowed for a higher axel load but fair point, thank you for informing me 🙂
So the engines just sat there idling away for 5 hours ? Glad they have the money to do that. Also when one of the trains went past at least 1 of the wheels was screaming it's head off .. had it locked up or the brake on it needed to be replaced?
Good morning Good afternoon Good night. Gained another follower here in Brazil. Your videos are fantastic, very beautiful places. Congratulations. Hugs. Cesar
Having driverless trains makes so much sense in the modern society. Technoloy can easily handle rail networks as they are a fixed and controllable asset, every centimetre of the line can be identified, every crossing, every rise and every fall of the line. The old every train needs a driver no longer stacks up, Now a days it’s no train needs a driver, as they only complicate the management on moving a train from point a to b to c with human limitations.
0:50 Takes model railroading to a whole new level, as railways that used to be big and then modelled, have once again become big AS MODELS. If a model railway can be automated and run remotely - ? Then there's absolutely no reason that big versions cannot be run exactly the same. Automated and run by remote control.
Yes I think only one loco needed to be running at a time while put away. Could be alternated between locos to keep fuel usage the same. Didn't see FRED working. Agree about replacing drivers. Big corporation don't give a damn about us peasants.
On a ton per mile bases, the drivers income would be so minimal per ton because of the huge productivity of these huge trains, yet we do away with the driver. We are all doing what we are doing on our amazing planet so that people have work, to feed families and live a reasonable life, but huge corporates do have no regard for that, they say they do, but its just BS. Why not do away with top end executives on huge incomes, and keep the frontline team employed and everyone benefits along the way.
Here Here !
It is not railways’ obligation to give money to people for doing things that are not needed.
@@marioxerxescastelancastro8019 so,, driving a train,, is unnecessary?
Pretty much, though to be fair automation would allow us to work on other things. This is why everyone should be given a base pay to live, without the costly cancer that is the owners and execs. Machines do our work, and we all live better (but only if we get rid of the top).
@@Waylo2k16 Read the video title and perhaps you will then figure.
As someone who lives in the U.S. it is weird to the point of creepy seeing the locomotives with the windshield blanked out and no one on board. It’s almost as if the locomotives are coming to life.
Those are shades, they use them in Brasil when the sun is shining and it's over 120 degrees ....they are not blanked out
Did you not know that .... Thomas the Tank Engine without the Belching Steam ...
Salut frère , j'aime se travail
Funny what pops up in my feed.... right now Im typing this at Tea tree camp on the Rio Rail mainline at 176kp. I am part of the construction crew currently replacing turn outs and replacing whole sections of rail and formation arounf the floodway bridges etc. Some of this line is untouched since when it was laid around 40 something years ago so its a "little overdue" for a refit. We work up to 3 meteres from any live track and having these things coming past at up to 80kph was super intimidating at first! Each train is carrying ore worth around 4 million Australian dollars and we see around 30 something a day pass by heading to the port. Great video Ive captured loads of footage myself and will put something together for the huge amounts of people commenting positively on this video. Cheers
Thanks for that , I worked for Rio Tinto for a while back in the nineties on their loco simulators .
Currently in ti tree 😂
Very nice to see the trains running perfectly synchronized as far as the eye can see.
Yes they run with very close headways
"Río Tinto" ("Red River") is a company that was born in Spain (specifically, in the province of Huelva, in western Andalusia), since the river of said name ("Tinto") carries the colored waters red, due to the copper that is in the place where it is born, and that was exploited by said company until 1954.
I know it well.
0k
Copper metal cannot be it. It has to copper compound which usually have green colour like copper suphate. Copper ores have green colour blue colour like malachite. If Rio Tonto in span was coloured red then it was because of iron ore like Hematite of Limonite.
@@leopardtiger1022 You are a very knowledgeable bot.
I know a driver up ther who got a six month contract to drive ten years ago "while they did the transition" to remote operation. He is still there driving locos there ten years later.
I would like to point out that BHP had a runaway train a few years back which had no driver. The accident cost the better part of a billion dollars what with destroyed track, wrecked wagons and locos and most expensive of all a few weeks lost production of iron ore while the line was closed.
Still all that aside a great video and stunning scenery. These places are really remote and a permit is needed to drive there, truck tyres being essential.
The driver was off the train checking something and brakes were not set properly due to air fault. Train moved off and with down gradient all the way to coast could not be stopped. It was deliberately derailed.
@@gjlwpl So, in other words, another reason for the automation of the trains
Not really. Since the driver was inspecting a fault, if the train was unmanned they would still have had to send a crew out by road. This would probably take hours out there. It is not a simple economic equation.
@@andrewblake2254 Any malfunction on automatic train while en route costs you more money than in train with driver - assuming that driver is skilled enough to repair it by himself. It means that more pressure is put on service crews and more money is spent on maintentance in depot. Same discussions are running in my industry - how much would it cost if crewless ships would brake down in the middle of the ocean?
Yes at least the onboard driver can do some diagnostic work. And failing that have a walk round to look. @@plasot
I watched many train videos for entertainment and to learn about freight trains and railroading in general. I've watched lots and lots of them. I vote the shot from 10:51 to 13:04 the best shot I have ever seen!
Thank you , glad you enjoyed it
Pretty mind-blowing to see autonomous freight trains in Australia! The locomotives look and sound a lot like the ones seen in my home country, the USA. Great catches!
Greetings from the United States!
GE AC 4400s, pretty standard for NA.
The locos are fully imported from the US , they are the same locos as used there .
@@johnphillips592 is all of your track the same gauge or just places like this? In other words, could any US train run any AUS track?
@@Hugo5t1gl1tz All states are now connected by standard gauge but we don't have the loading gauge to import U.S. locos , check out studio.ruclips.net/user/videoVnwEeyFties/edit for examples of our diesels .
Sooner or later we'll be seeing more trains like this in the U.S.
These precision side by side shots are amazing. What a unique operation. Thanks for sharing and glad to stumble upon this video.
Glad you enjoyed it , please check out my other videos some more iron ore trains as well as others , thank you .
One of only a few countries where this is possible because of the unihabited open vastness!!
True , not much out there .
It's mind blowing how far technology has come, I asked about Autonomous Trains no-less than 4 years ago during an imaginative stupor while writing, I was told by a few people that it was either stupid, impossible, unsafe, and completely unnecessary, while others said it'd be for special types of trains, or for Japan's High-Speed network, yet, here we are automating Iron, in Australia of all places.
I don't know why you're impressed. Of all vehicles, a train is the simplest to automate. It moves in a one-dimensional world (vs 2 for automobiles and 3 for airplanes), with guaranteed rights of way.
@@strnbrg59 Because I really like trains and I think this is cool?
@@FurryFailure driverless trains have been around for decades
@@strnbrg59 Just because its the "simplest" doesnt mean its "simple". These are different words. There is still a shit load of programming when it comes to automating trains.
What up, my fellow fur?
Pretty amazing to to think a computer program is in charge of these huge ore trains. This takes remote operation of locomotive in switching to a whole different level. I was thinking how could a program take into account the feel and experience of an actual engineer to account for load, track, braking and grades but I guess if you have all these variables (non-variables I guess ) standardized the program can do it’s thing.
I can definitely see this being a great option for long, non hazardous cargo in not densely populated isolated territory.
Trains that have ptc (not sure if it's that exact system) are pretty much autonomous. Ptc is something like adaptive cruise control. The train will automatically speed up and slow down, compensate for hills etc.
We've had driverless commuter trains on a light railway in London since the mid-1980s I think. I'm amazed that they aren't more widespread, given the continual push to cut costs.
@@anotherfreediver3639 I’ve heard some commuter rails in USA cities have the capability but the “optics” of having a driver-less train they feel doesn’t go over well with the public. I think many systems use the approach mentioned where a driver sits at the controls as a back-up in case anything goes wrong. Maybe a lifelike mannequin could suffice? 🤔
Wait til you learn NASA's rocket flew to the Moon with 1960's computers.
@@Quasihamster 💩👤 🧌
Thanks John, Excellent footage - loved the parallel running too.
Thanks mate , yes lucky to get that , needed to wait five hours to get it though , don't know how many games of Freecell I played while waiting
@@johnphillips592
Thank you for taking the trouble on behalf of everyone who has watched and enjoyed the whole reporting. It was lovely.
You should divide the number of games of Freecell played by the number of people who have watched the video. It think the ratio will _definitely_ be less than one ! ✊🏼🤘🏼🤗
Truly awesome! Really unique to see parallel trains running like that too. Sounds scary, being driverless, but quite safe in the grand scheme, considering the location and that even with human operators, trains of that size will never stop quickly and they legally have the right-of-way in most if not all countries. Trains are already one of the most routine transports, being on rail and completely controlled by signals when not in yards. Even with a human in the seat, it's quite procedural, something perfect for computers to handle, when you're willing to trust them haha. Even collision detection could be far quicker performed by sensors and a computer (same reason we see it in pretty much all modern cars).
Thanks for the fantastic video! I'm sure it took quite a bit of effort to get out there :)
Thank you , glad you enjoyed it , yes it was a long trip to get there but worth it .
I'm guessing that these rail lines are exclusively Rio Tinto so they can have it all automated without any issues. I don't think you would be able to do that on US mainlines.
@@vijayanchomatil8413 Yes , only Rio Tinto iron ore trains use this line .
I disagree for us here in America, I want a human in the seat. Rio Tinto has very little crossings and what people are track side are workers, a random railfan that's it. This line is perfect for computers to run on, set train length each weighs more or less the same, with no towns. in America our trains are never the same every time. Rio Tinto and a guy on youtube (David Rayner) made great videos how the system works. But for other parts of the world this is not going to work as well, too many variables.
I'd be interested to find out how the automated system works and how it avoids failures, collisions etc?
This might help. It's a video about the system from Hitachi, and includes shots of the Perth control room - ruclips.net/video/Fyeb8AQig3w/видео.html - the trains have lots of safety features including collision avoidance and real time video.
And this is a driver setting up a train at the port to return to the mining area - ruclips.net/video/BDbfDUqPm8E/видео.html . It seems that the trains run up to the designated mine under full auto, get loaded and return. The only place with real drivers is at the port.
I am sure it is loaded with computerized electronics but it was possible 100 years ago with standard railroad signal track circuits and electromechanical devices.
This is an iron ore system and is connected to anything else. No passenger trains so it's easier to automate.
Avoid failure or collision? They can’t! It would take a few miles to stop, and there’s no way to avoid a breakdown, outside routine maintenance.
They still crash, one hit the ground and overturned in the Pilbara not that long ago
The blue lights on the roof of the cab reminds me of the daleks!
Agreed , they do look like Dareks .
Miss those days,Rio Tinto and BHPIO,first it was two men then one now none,when you spend so much time in the early days with one other person in the cab you just have to get on with each other,not dissimilar to a marriage.You have done a marvellous job John,i can nearly smell the spinifex.
Thanks for this great comment Eric much appreciated .
Did you practice lots of marriage formalities?
@@MilwaukeeF40C yes had turns cooking and washing up,if things went wrong,hot wheels,bearings,emergency application, the driver did the walking, otherwise possible seperation.
better than smelling the other bloke in the cab
This level of Tech can now been seen in the ELK Valley in British Columbia, thanks to CP Rail cutting jobs while increasing the hazards to the general public. The sensors may give the remote operator all of the real time data about the train's operation, but not the forest and grass fires that are started by the trains, something that a pair of mark 1 eyes balls do from the cab.
There is no "remote operator" in this level of tech. It's remotely monitored, in this case 1500 miles away. Night and day difference.
Good luck trying to find a forest in that part of Australia.
@@Mikishots Yeah it's kind of hard to see something go wrong with the train by eye from 1500 miles away. but hey, as long as it hurts the rail unions it's worth it (assuming you're a rail exec)
Well I think it would be unlikely that a driver of such a train could witness a spark flying from a 500 ft train, landing in some grass and smouldering into a fire, while driving a train at the same time but perhaps the Canadian train drivers have superior vision. In the UK. it's just a relief when the drivers are actually in the train and not on strike.
@@richardhasler6718 those trains average about 2.4km in length with the record being 7.3km. A human driver can’t even see the end of the train they are driving. And even if they see an obstruction on the rail ahead of them they can’t stop in time. Hence the dependence on remote sensors - which can be monitored 1,500 miles away from the Pilbara in a central facility in Perth.
Great video John and with all the money they save not paying drivers they could spend some refreshing the paint on their locos as they look appalling. Thanks again for the nice video.
Agreed , some are a bit grotty ,
It is more because of dirt than deterioration of the paint. They should wash the locomotives.
Because western Australia has people lining up to look at the things.
Pilbara trains have always looked gritty. It is beautiful.
The environment is harsh - lots of dust and strong sun. It's not a place tourists go
Mighty impressive technical feat. Thanks for sharing, I had no idea of this.
Thanks ,Yes it's pretty impressive
Thanks for the upload, it brings back lots of memorys of when i was machining ore car wheels at Port Hedland for Mt Newman mining in the lathe pit, very enjoyable times.
Thanks , glad it brought back happy memories
Hi
I used to work on this rail line back in the 90’s
Great times
I could still identify many locations
Been up and down that track many times
Thanks for the memories
I remember when those locos were brand new
We watched them being unloaded at the dock and taken to seven mile workshops for the bogie installation…
Cheers
@@batmanlives6456 Thanks , glad it brought back some memories for you .
Great video. As a great man once said ‘People make problem, drone better’
amazing what pops up in your Yt feed, i had no idea these existed. greetings from the insane asylum formerly known as Queensland.
Thanks , glad you enjoyed it , feel free to view more of my videos
On our mine we have fully autonomous dump trucks driving all over the place. They are a pain in the arse! 😆 But interesting as more complicated than trains as don't run on rails and have to interact with manned vehicles in a constantly changing environment.
They're a bit safer on the haul road after the water cart's been through. Now if we could have automated graders we won't have grader drivers bitching and moaning over the CB to stay off the fucking windrows
Sounds like the rails were freshly ground in most of those shots.
Cool stuff!
On long runs like that, the biggest hazard is boredom and sensory hypnosis. I have witnessed napping engineers more than once. I gave up the ass callouses many years ago for less boring, dangerous and terrifying jobs. Ever been in a train wreck? I have, several. They are really loud.
you done?
@@OregonCrowno
I worked on the two perma nent line camps and just to see the rail grinder at work during the night in winter with ahalf moon was mind blowing, i called the scene the lonely Dragon serpent, the pilbara has always been a magical place for me.
One bucked rail will suprise that robot! 😮😅
There are so many things a good mechanic knows from feel, smell, touch and hearing that a computer cannot know and dosent have sensors attached to that this is insulting that someone could possibly think this is a good idea or is saving money. Only a corporation could be this greedy and detached from reality.
"driverless trains are not so friendly" :'))
These trains have bankers to get them over the hills so they can then roll down to the coast. These are manned as I know a driver. He tells me that these "unmanned" trains often carry a driver even if they are controlled remotely.
Wrong, the driver sets everything up at the mine....he dismounts about a minute before the train departs
Thank you for sharing this video, it is good to see some green foliage in the landscape as well. I do enjoy the drone footage.
Thank you Robyn , they have had a lot of rain over there in recent months .
Thankyou mr. John Phillips videos.
Very different views of passing of two trains running through two railway tracks into one direction in parallel as twins single lines.
Thankyou for this very good surprise.
Carry-on your greate efforts.
Thank you , it's an interesting railway
@@johnphillips592 ❤️
Great video sir. A suggestion. Maybe have the captions on screen longer for those that watch at 1.25 or 1.5 video speed. Keep up the good work!!
Thanks for the comment , I now do voice overs on my video's after a lot of comments that the captions tended to distract from the video content .
My factorio senses are tingling
Fantastic. Feast for the eyes. I like it. Thanks for the efforts.
Thanks for your kind comment , glad you enjoyed it .
MAD MAX FEEL ABOUT THIS SET UP
Over here in the U.S. we refer to them as engineers
Yes but we know what you mean. Lol.
At Rio Tinto they call them ballast.
Very interesting.
In case of an accident, how do they get the thing to stop? Do they have sensors that will go off if they detect an impact?
My understanding is that there is a human supervisor watching them for the whole trip. They can do an emergency stop remotely from a Perth control centre
@@Mechknight73 Yes - they are driven by humans its just that they are not located in the cabin.
No doubt that they can stop that train remotely. But if something is going wrong and building up to a potential accident how would they know apart from continous surveillance by camera all along the length of the train .
@@ianmontgomery7534 No, they are not driven by humans in Perth. The train controller does nothing more than they used to - operate the signals to tell the train (was once the driver, now the train) when to start and stop. Based on the signals, the train drives itself. Eg; If the signal 20kms ahead is at stop, a driver can choose to keep going at full speed, stop at the signal, and wait for it to clear or he can slow down now and if the signal has cleared before he gets there he won't have to stop, or he can stop anywhere between here and there (say, on a downhill grade rather than the uphill grade the signal is on to make starting off easier) and wait for it to clear (I say 'signal' but it's all in the cab so yes, you can see a signal that's 20 kms away). The train controller nor the program that runs the train can't do that. All the controller can do is set the signal to stop and the train will continue at track speed until it gets to where braking would normally occur to stop at that signal.
@@jkardez4794 They don't. No one is looking at the view from the camera. The only time they do is when an impact sensor on the loco alarms so they look to see what the train has hit (usually a cow) but whatever it was, they only see it after the event and then decide whether or not to stop the train. There was a time around 2016 while they were still testing it that a driver of an empty train rolling down the hill towards where the Robe train was filmed noticed that a man who had obviously decided to kill himself had laid his neck across the track. The driver slammed on the brakes and stopped before he cut the man's head off but had that been an AutoHaul train, no one would've known until the driver of a Robe train (still manned to this day because Robe will not spend the money to AutoHaul their track) came along and then only if it was daylight.
As a lad (1970's), my neighbor that worked in the Northern MN (USA) iron ore mines told me he ran the trains in the mine area with a remote control that was housed in a backpack he wore. I didn't believe him...
Nice one , reminds me of the cane trains in Queensland shunting by the driver on the ground with a remote control
He was right I worked at a RR USSteel I started in 1973 by late 70’s early 80’s off come the backpack a box about 10 to 12 inches wide to 4 inches deep 4 inches tall placed on a belt rite in front of your belly he would stand on the ground and could see some lights on one of the four corners of the engine and the roe of different colors lights would tell him what the engine was about to do stop,reverse,forward or pumping air. He would throw switches and sometimes he would have another person on the other end of train with a radio telling him what to do
@@buffalobob7172 Thank you for the info!!!
Excellent drone work, Mr. Phillips! Beautiful dramatic shots.
Thanks Jeff , it was a long way to get there but worth the effort .
INTRAMOTIV in St Louis, MO is currently working on autonomous self powered rail cars. The cars are battery powered and when connected together in a train they all work together forming a "locomotiveless" train. Still in development but targeting this very market.
as long as there is a balance between automation and manned work then I don’t see a problem
The problem I have with automation is when company’s abuse it to kick out the middle guy to save a few extra coins
This is a good show, driverless, thats very good. Keep it up.
The diesels could do with a bit of a paint job, even if they are in the outback a lot.
Agreed but some are better than others
Great photography. Well done.
you have double empty tracts, latch and pull side cea siding to siding
Just watched your video, very well done and informative. It used to be empowering to see a person in charge of all that machinery and to think of what people are capable of. This makes people servants to the machines, fueling and repairing them as needed. Until they can work out how to do that also.
Outstanding video. Thanks.
Thanks , glad you enjoyed it .
Quick question - at about 13:00 mark you can see what looks like rail that is laid inside of the actual rail the trains are running on - is that some sort of derail prevention? Thanks and great video!
That is new rail ready to be installed on the curve
Question, How many coal cars doesit take to have the equivalant amount of metal to buuild one outback?
The fact that corporations spend billions so as they don't have to pay a driver enough to feed a driver and his family is a nauseating.
It’s more for the safety of the driver. These tracks are a majority in the middle of nowhere. It’s hard to do crew changes and if something happens and the drivers are stranded or a medical emergency they are hundreds of miles away from help
An excellent video indeed. There's something that's hard to describe, maybe a kind of realisation really, that comes over a person as they see these things in action for real. I worked in the Pilbara for a few weeks in an elevated area, next to the open valley of Karijini National Park, where I seen the constant stream of autonomous trains arrive off the main north/south line and take the large circular loop below the loading stations where they fill the trucks one by one and gradually loop around to take their place alongside the main line back north once again, moving Australia to China, one truckload at a time. They take around 3hrs to complete a loading phase before setting off north to port once again. On cool still mornings, once the final trucks had been loaded and despite being a few km/miles from the train, we could clearly hear the engines pick up from 3hrs or so idle and load up followed by the clinking of every truck's connection to the next as they took up the slack. Most interesting and impressive. Automation and AI will no doubt continue continue to hone this process and remove more humans from the entire process, including the mining. I hope China will continue to remain a willing customer...
Are these the ones that will become battery electric? Regen braking down hill when fully loaded recharging enough to get back up again when empty.
No , that's Fortesque but not at the moment., I think they are having problems
Looking forward to visiting Australia and meeting my relations in Campbelltown NSW.
How does the train sense an obstruction on the tracks, human, animal, vehicle, machinery, or other debris?
There are cameras on the locos that are monitored from the control room but these trains are heavy and don't stop easily , maned or not .
cool video!
Fantastic footage there, John. Loved it. James.
Thanks James , glad you enjoyed the footage , cheers
@@johnphillips592 Hi John. Did you travel to Australia specifically in order to film the ore trains ? Absolutely loved the aerials. James.
@@FrogandFlangeVideo I live in Melbourne and was on a caravan trip around Australia , have visited there several times before , my first RUclips video was on these trains
@@johnphillips592 My brother referred your video to me. Coincidentally I had just weekes ago did a little dive into the rail action in the Pilbara, Cool stuff happening ther. Thanks John. James.
Absolutely insane. Suppose there's an obstruction on the track? One of those old GE clunkers catches fire? How long until a Rapid Response Team could get out to it?
5 weeks
A day or two by road depending on where it shits its pants. Probably have helicopters for that though
Ive flown my drone over the tain ans had gotten some aweome videos and photos. When i drove darwin to cairns i had left my car unattended for 5 mins. And in that time my drone and camera that were on the back seat were stolen. If i ever see my videos uploaded onto youtube ill be going after whoever uploaded them.
Looks hot AF! What beautiful country.
12:38 amazing!
I wonder if they are running Cattron or Control Chief systems? I worked on installs for Cattron and was a CMO for years with short line rail. Them 2% grades are making those ladies sweat a little :) I am so fortunate to have been a composite mechanic and a working CMO for the years I did that and I am so fortunate to not do it still, I miss it but it was some hard work.
Thanks for the vids bro, made me smile and have good memories!
This is every factorio player's biggest dream or worst nightmare.
That was fun. I wonder why they sat there for 5 hours with the engines running? Perhaps they could've aired up the consist 45 mins before departure or switched off two engines and left one engine running to maintain brake pipe pressure. I dunno seems like a waste of fuel but who am I but a RUclips nobody with just another opinion?
I thought the same , maybe something to do with keeping the air up , they have no one to put the hand brakes on .
@@johnphillips592 The lead locomotive is the one responsible for the air brakes, both in controlling them and building air. The second two are only there to assist in power and braking. Now it might be different in autohaul but I doubt it. I don't know if these are setup with auto start/stop systems on them I would guess yes. They would shutdown base on water temp air temp etc. The problem I see with that and this might be the reason why they are left running is Autohaul can't predict when they will be on the move again, some guy or girl clicks start on the computer at the dispatch office and the train goes, so there be no time to start the second two. From what I have seen the engines are setup to go at any moment. If you list to the clips in your video John like at 5:25 these ES44DCi's are not in low idle (happens when you put the reverser in neutral to save fuel and start the auto start/stop system) they are in high idle ready to go. at 15:20 when the sun is shirring through the cab and no one is in it that to me... just scary reminds me of the movie Unstoppable.
theres switches to switch , ect.ect. to turn them off , theres no-one on the train to do all that , and in the overall scheme of things , they dont use a lot of fuel just sitting there idling
In America, there is no iron mining. There is refining as there is more than we need. I can only guess that this ore is going to the ones who need it, China. Amazing footage. Thanks for sharing it. I truly enjoyed it.
Thanks , glad you enjoyed it , yes , most of the iron ore is shipped overseas .
That's not true, though iron mining is certainly waning in the US with mines continuing to shutdown (this has been the pattern with every type of ore). But there are still a handful in operation, producing millions of tons annually. Not just refining, but actual mining. Though there are also reclamation efforts from tailings, that might be what you're referring to.
These driverless trains are intimidating as heck! Like just getting close to them with their sheer size is enough to say “nope”. But everything Rio does is big. Then you see them running parallel in the same direction and your like that’s just freaky!
Yes they sure are , just to watch one move off without a person on board is quite a sight to see
@@johnphillips592 Be the absolute perfect train for "HOBO's and Train Hoppers" (no one to see them getting on - or off, at signal stops along the way)
@@WSTLNZ These trains run in the middle of nowhere , not much point riding them .
@@johnphillips592 Always a "point" to riding something - instead of walking - as who in their right mind (or in the mind of anything else) would WALK 1600 miles?
I am the director of operations at Rio Tinto Australia and I can assure you that while this video is genuine the captions are completely misleading. Our trains have one of the best safety records anywhere in the world, including Japan. And if you consider the tonnage we are the #1 in the world. In our country, it is completely illegal to operate trains without an operator. All of these have 2 operators functioning in a fail-safe mode. Further more, these locomotives also have dual and triple redundant controls.
What does that mean? Where are the dirivers? Are they in Perth? Or are they on the train? Or are the working from home?
If the trains have operators, why are the insides of the windshields covered?
@@3sierra15 its a literal shade that protects from the outback scrotching sun
@@johnfenn yes there is a control facillity where these trains are controlled
I remember in NZ on the seventies NZ Railways instituted the use of radios in shunt operations and the union furore that followed. On a lengthy goods train at the marshalling yard suddenly a ground shunt staff of 3 or 4 replaced by 1 guy with a radio. But that's just the start. Next it was single man train crews losing the loco assistant. Elimination of the rear guards van staff (read caboose) And then lose of the single ground shunt man when the driver escaped the shunt loco controls for a remote hand set on the ground. Bring back memories people's? That's how big business rolls with the how can we squeeze the last ounce from that bottom dollar. Chime in peeps from around
the world..
Did those wigwags come on upon approach of a residential area, or did it sense your nearby car and is warning you in case you had your back turned?
I presume you mean the flashing ditch lights , they come on when the horn blows and they are programmed to do that at level crossings
That was a great video John!
Thanks for that , enjoyed making it and glad you enjoyed it
Im sure these driverless train is just another accident waiting to happen
@MysticRenn and the track can be in poor condition also
Driverless ore trains! Fascinating!
that same train could have pulled both of those lines
There is more explanation on how this system works?
Amount of money these companies make suppling a few drivers some jobs would be the right thing to do
7:48 Two very long trains, just sitting there for 5 hours, because Rio Tinto thinks somehow that this is cheaper? That's 5 lost hours, for each train... but with people in control, they could have called ahead, at least to find out if they can move under caution? Also - people can predict and react to the unexpected - computers can only respond if what has happened is in the programming, to begin with?
In this case no, they were replacing a bridge girder just up the track , no trains could get through
Great to see train drivers being unemployed and obsolete!! Well done corporate agendas!!
They can always learn to code.
Is there any vehicle easier to automate
Their logistics division must all play Factorio.
once a train is loaded and ready to go, who initializes the loco to start moving? control center like with a drone?
It is set to auto by an employee on the ground then the control centre in Perth takes over .
David Rayner has a video showing how it’s done - he’s obviously one of the drivers or was one. He set it all up, locked the loco cab, radioed up the control folks and they sent the train on its merry little way. Unto about half an hour ago I had no idea such a system existed - I’m from Scotland and we have nothing similar. It’s amazing to see such a massive train trundle away on its own!
@@Highland_Moo Yes, I retired in Dec 2019 after 10 years at Cape Lambert. BTW, I was in Scotland in 2018 went the system went 'live'. Absolutely beautiful place. On my last shift before I went, I drove a train from Tom Price to Cape Lambert and when I came back 6 weeks later, I was told I'd never go there again and I didn't. Spent my final year in the yard and on the Robe line. At least we at Cape Lambert had the Robe line. No other depot still drives on the main line at all. Very sad.
Great Video, I know this area is isolated, but surely there are some risks to people and property with driverless trains, thanks for sharing
yes
Driver or not , if you get in the way of these trains they wont stop in a hurry .
I suspect that having a hazardous encounter with a driverless train is way, way, down on the list of things that can kill you in that locale.
So half of a hopper would be the engineers pay for the day? Week?
Help me understand why man insists on destroying other men for profit.
I been on these trains from mt tom price iron ore mining town of tom price way back in 1980.s
Is it autonomous or remote controlled? If the latter I would not trust it without extensive testing in accident-prone situations.
They refer to it as autonomous but not sure .
A remote operator (sitting at a desk in a skyscraper in Perth 1300 kms away) tells it where to go. It uses power and braking as needed to follow the speed limit and signals. However I'm not sure if the AutoHaul makes instantaneous decisions based on gradient and speed etc, or whether there is some sort of pre-programming of the power/braking needed to climb or descend down tricky sections of the line.
In theory it can detect when a collision has happened and bring the train to a halt. But my understanding is it won't see a car parked on the tracks and apply brakes before a collision - not that it really matters for a train this heavy.
What I don't understand is why they don't just use bigger ore cars ? I mean there must be a reason but wouldn't it be better to have a train with 150 large ore cars vs one with 300 small ones ? I'm thinking maintenance wise etc ? awesome video :)
Iron ore is very heavy , if you had bigger wagons they would have too heavy axle load .
@@johnphillips592 Good point, I thought with the rail’s being used by heavy industry they might have allowed for a higher axel load but fair point, thank you for informing me 🙂
What happes if the locos suddenly run amuck i know i worked with remote locos when they go rouge watch out and they do
What have I become???? Watching videos of unmand LOOOOOOONG ASS trains in the outback!!! 😊😊😊😊😊😊 I need to get a grip!!
Driverless train is a better idea, compared to driverless car.
on god making cars driverless isnt even fixing any problem
So the engines just sat there idling away for 5 hours ? Glad they have the money to do that. Also when one of the trains went past at least 1 of the wheels was screaming it's head off .. had it locked up or the brake on it needed to be replaced?
Here in Ireland, GM locos in the more remote stations were left idling overnight in case they wouldn't cold start in the morning
doesn't matter if someone steps in front of it, it couldn't stop anyway....
Yes , very true
Good morning Good afternoon Good night.
Gained another follower here in Brazil.
Your videos are fantastic, very beautiful places.
Congratulations.
Hugs.
Cesar
Hello Cesar , thank you , glad you enjoy my videos and thanks for the comment .
Having driverless trains makes so much sense in the modern society. Technoloy can easily handle rail networks as they are a fixed and controllable asset, every centimetre of the line can be identified, every crossing, every rise and every fall of the line.
The old every train needs a driver no longer stacks up, Now a days it’s no train needs a driver, as they only complicate the management on moving a train from point a to b to c with human limitations.
Do they control the train remotely or is it 100% automatic
They are controlled from Perth but as far as I know it's computers that do the controlling .
Now that's some loooong trains!
so do these trains have a dead computer switch?
Sorry , can't help you there .
😂
Has there ever been stowaways on the trains?
Don't think so , far too remote
Great work 💖💖
Thanks , glad you enjoyed it .
I thought trains went the other direction in Australia?
What is the fumoth verses the singfolding? How many kibbards would it take on any special jack time for us?
0:50
Takes model railroading to a whole new level, as railways that used to be big and then modelled, have once again become big AS MODELS.
If a model railway can be automated and run remotely - ?
Then there's absolutely no reason that big versions cannot be run exactly the same.
Automated and run by remote control.
Spent billions to avoid paying a driver thousands. Yep.
Driver salary is us$100k a year plus cost of flights and accommodation Rio pay for
Yes I think only one loco needed to be running at a time while put away. Could be alternated between locos to keep fuel usage the same. Didn't see FRED working. Agree about replacing drivers. Big corporation don't give a damn about us peasants.
They probably have ECP brakes, in which case, no need for the FUCKING rear end device.
You wanna be in the cab in a desert for 48 hours or more with no Air Conditioner? 200 degrees in that thing.
Why would they want to have drivers when you can do it better remote.
@@ksavage681 Shifts are 12 hours of which you'd spend no more than 10 in the cab and if the AC is not working, that loco can't lead.