at 12:01 If its kept private then it should be fine, I feel that private and public life is being blended together in this case because when its in your house, its private when its on the street then its public whatever you do in your home is not a concern of the government or anyone(unless illegal) Its when you want to enforce it onto others in public is when the line is drawn
How wonderful to have open debates… so unlike USA where I live …we only experience riots! This is a “breath of fresh air”! Oh that we could return to public debates!
Great talker, but he is either strawmanning the oposition (wich is possible due to a vagueöy defined topic) or wrong in some of his points. One example: Concerning the moral framework provided by religion I would argue we as a society need to admit its wrong to base our moral on religion. I as an atheist will give my moral framework on to my children as religious people will do with theirs. Neither my framework nor the religious is perfect, but I don't claim mine to be and mine is open to scrutiny and change based on changed circumstances of life and knowledge. That way we can grow as society and move on. If we base our values in ancient texts and claim them to be perfect we can choose to follow them only loosely, as is admitted here most believers do, but then I would ask why you should claim your moral framework to be based on religion. How do you decide which rules you accept and which you don't? And if the basis for your framework always goes back to ancient religious texts it is impossible to evolve away as refuted parts of the framework stay unchangend and keep coming back.
I feel this opener shows the requirement of carefully defining a topic. Wright in his opener seemed to focus almost entirely on the idea of Policy, rather than more general public life, where as Shewry clearly has in mind all places outside the home as the interpretation of this topic. This is why you should think carefully about the implications of the actual debate question, not just how the af try to define it. In this case siding with an af who only talk about policy could leave you open to the idea of "No churches allowed" if not worded carefully. I did enjoy the af in this debate being told they have a burden though when so many on their side (though not necessarily in the room) deny this clearly true fact.
@@pabze If you are saying about God's appearance, he is Real! I read a lot of Science of Medicine, Human Body and about this Universe that's my conclusion! My God Allah is present.
@@afrazkhitran812 I think that you can believe whatever you want but when it comes down to actual proof you have none. Atheists on the other hand have multiple pieces of evidence that contradict the idea that god is real. For example, if god is real why do many religious texts and ideas claimed to have been handed down by a god contradict proven science? If god is real what’s to say yours, (assumedly Allah) Is the right one? There have probably been countless things that humans have prayed through throughout our existence. Why are you so sure that yours is real and all those other countless deities are false?
how some selected christian students says that religion has no place in public life where are the other religions like islam, hindu and budda or the term religion only apples to christian ?
@@lesleymcconnach671 excellent. Sounds like you had fun. Just don't worry too much. The news and media makes it seem like everything is the end of the world. It isn't. They need views. Keep going and make the world you want. You can do it.
@@c0rse Look at the complexity of human life. The world and humans are way to complecated to have come about by chance. The Big Bang theory violates scientific laws and principles. One of the laws in thermodynamics is that energy cannot be created or destroyed in an isolated system. However, this is exactly what people think happend in The Big Bang?.
@@ravenwhite6843 Chance or not it doesn't mean the characters humans have created as their gods mean anything. Characters that cause children to suffer and die incidentally.
@@ravenwhite6843 Stop attributing evolutionary progress to some ooga-booga man in the sky. You brain is making excuses for scientific chain of events which it cannot explain. Atoms to smudge to cells to living organisms to animals to humans. Don't be scared Jamzie, just because we weren't created by one sole individual, does not make life any less exciting, quite the contrary. The big bang theory is so amazingly scary that it is hard to accept. Yet it has been explained and reasoned to much greater extents than simply monotheistic conclusions, which you seem to praise.
D1 Sarcasm? The lowest form of wit. Yes, I’m familiar with it. It’s very difficult to convey sarcasm in the written word, it’s even more difficult with your low IQ and poor language skills.
Maria Michael I’m afraid most of us in the UK just don’t care anymore. We don’t believe these Bronze Age stories are divinely inspired, sorry if it offends you but it’s better this way.
In year 11he drank fermented yeast water out of a beaker in science because he was told it was alcoholic then proceeded to act drunk the rest of the day
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
Watch the full debate here > ruclips.net/video/SlD8nKayMzU/видео.html
Not many can produce and deliver a timeless speech. Impressive speaker
This guy pissed himself in school one time
at 12:01
If its kept private then it should be fine,
I feel that private and public life is being blended together in this case
because when its in your house, its private
when its on the street then its public
whatever you do in your home is not a concern of the government or anyone(unless illegal)
Its when you want to enforce it onto others in public is when the line is drawn
How wonderful to have open debates… so unlike USA where I live …we only experience riots! This is a “breath of fresh air”! Oh that we could return to public debates!
Lol that's exactly what I was thinking.
The augment is a bit weak in my mind.
I think that the defention of what is public life is quite clear.
Policy making.
Nothing more nothing less.
No. Religion should have place in politics where people making political decisions based on their religion
Great talker, but he is either strawmanning the oposition (wich is possible due to a vagueöy defined topic) or wrong in some of his points. One example: Concerning the moral framework provided by religion I would argue we as a society need to admit its wrong to base our moral on religion. I as an atheist will give my moral framework on to my children as religious people will do with theirs. Neither my framework nor the religious is perfect, but I don't claim mine to be and mine is open to scrutiny and change based on changed circumstances of life and knowledge. That way we can grow as society and move on. If we base our values in ancient texts and claim them to be perfect we can choose to follow them only loosely, as is admitted here most believers do, but then I would ask why you should claim your moral framework to be based on religion. How do you decide which rules you accept and which you don't? And if the basis for your framework always goes back to ancient religious texts it is impossible to evolve away as refuted parts of the framework stay unchangend and keep coming back.
Still waiting for a clear definition of religion.
In my opinion, I would have to say that religion is a platform for moral standards in society, which also adds a spectrum of what happens after death.
L. C. You’re an absolute idiot.
still waiting for a definition of definition
Good reasoning around the question itself. And a good point remembering which side actually has the burden of proof.
I feel this opener shows the requirement of carefully defining a topic. Wright in his opener seemed to focus almost entirely on the idea of Policy, rather than more general public life, where as Shewry clearly has in mind all places outside the home as the interpretation of this topic.
This is why you should think carefully about the implications of the actual debate question, not just how the af try to define it. In this case siding with an af who only talk about policy could leave you open to the idea of "No churches allowed" if not worded carefully.
I did enjoy the af in this debate being told they have a burden though when so many on their side (though not necessarily in the room) deny this clearly true fact.
Welcome to Yap City: Population - You
This lad straight up roasted the entire lineup, athecucks on suicide watch
Hi calgach v
Wood like friends with me
Lesley Mcconnach
get back down on your hands an knees an keep kissing the feet of something that isnt real
@@pabze If you are saying about God's appearance, he is Real! I read a lot of Science of Medicine, Human Body and about this Universe that's my conclusion! My God Allah is present.
@@afrazkhitran812 cool conclusion but its wrong
@@afrazkhitran812 I think that you can believe whatever you want but when it comes down to actual proof you have none. Atheists on the other hand have multiple pieces of evidence that contradict the idea that god is real. For example, if god is real why do many religious texts and ideas claimed to have been handed down by a god contradict proven science? If god is real what’s to say yours, (assumedly Allah) Is the right one? There have probably been countless things that humans have prayed through throughout our existence. Why are you so sure that yours is real and all those other countless deities are false?
bro is just yappin
these young brilliant students should talk the conservative french candidate ERIC, they a lot of things to teach him actually.
Talk or write to *
Eton??
how some selected christian students says that religion has no place in public life where are the other religions like islam, hindu and budda or the term religion only apples to christian ?
Britain is a Christian nation.
It's almost like there's no god, and all the different religions are just making it up...
Was he born with his eyebrows like that or is he able to raise one?
Nice debate
impressive
Hi Adm shewry l stay in my home loakdown and the coronavrius
I feeling very down a about this lockdow coronavrius
Lesleymcconnach
Hey man. Hope things get better. Lockdown will be over soon and things will get back to normal. It will pass. Keep fighting
Hi Josh Nim
I had a great time on my brithday
Lesley Mcconnach
@@lesleymcconnach671 excellent. Sounds like you had fun. Just don't worry too much. The news and media makes it seem like everything is the end of the world. It isn't. They need views.
Keep going and make the world you want. You can do it.
Sounds quite pompous and uptight
*British
It's entirely boring. How to see a Satan in the eyes of a Saint? To show him, that you have got Paradise, he is out of.
I can't stop yawning!
Good to see a young man utterly btfo a collection of godless boomers.
Everyone is godless because there is no god
@@c0rse Yawn
@@c0rse Look at the complexity of human life. The world and humans are way to complecated to have come about by chance. The Big Bang theory violates scientific laws and principles. One of the laws in thermodynamics is that energy cannot be created or destroyed in an isolated system. However, this is exactly what people think happend in The Big Bang?.
@@ravenwhite6843 Chance or not it doesn't mean the characters humans have created as their gods mean anything. Characters that cause children to suffer and die incidentally.
@@ravenwhite6843 Stop attributing evolutionary progress to some ooga-booga man in the sky. You brain is making excuses for scientific chain of events which it cannot explain. Atoms to smudge to cells to living organisms to animals to humans. Don't be scared Jamzie, just because we weren't created by one sole individual, does not make life any less exciting, quite the contrary. The big bang theory is so amazingly scary that it is hard to accept. Yet it has been explained and reasoned to much greater extents than simply monotheistic conclusions, which you seem to praise.
I love religious people. It’s fascinating to see how deluded adults can be.
Great argument!
D1 That’s a statement. Don’t you know the difference?
@@deltanovember1672 have you heard of sarcasm?
L. C. Your comment makes no sense. Read it then start again.
D1 Sarcasm? The lowest form of wit. Yes, I’m familiar with it. It’s very difficult to convey sarcasm in the written word, it’s even more difficult with your low IQ and poor language skills.
No original thought, he's just parroting the same old junk that everyone has heard a thousand times.
Zzzzzzz
You just described the proposition side extraordinarily well
@@RevivedRecords It's your side that is making the claim of the existence of God. It's up to your side to prove it.
In God we trust will forever be the winning argument 🙏🙏🙏🌈🌈🌈🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
Maria Michael Lol. 🤦♂️
What a dreadful disrespectful thing to say about Lord Jesus Christ.
Maria Michael I’m afraid most of us in the UK just don’t care anymore. We don’t believe these Bronze Age stories are divinely inspired, sorry if it offends you but it’s better this way.
In year 11he drank fermented yeast water out of a beaker in science because he was told it was alcoholic then proceeded to act drunk the rest of the day