23:42 I think price is definitely not the subject here. It has something to do with the sentence structure involving 'whether...or', which means the considered subject here has be problems or hyteria. And since whether...or is a conjunction and we have seen the rule for the same in the previous videos, the first noun (problems), will be considered as the subject here. So I think A is the correct answer.
22:19 When compound subjects are joined by or (or neither/nor) the verb should agree with the subject that is closest to the verb. So for brief hysteria 'was' is correct.
Thank you so much for tour classes. this is very helpful . I appreciate how calmly you explained all the concepts and thoroughly explained each and every practice questions. Thank you once again. Keep uploading :)
Exactly boss the use of 'which' after a ' , ' makes the portion as unrequired information. So the last part of the sentence corresponds to the first part of the sentence and therefore, 'helps' should be related with 'methods' and not 'antioxidants.'
23:45 isn't it should be 'were' and not 'was' because prices aren't the subject but the factors that are driving the price down . In my opinion the correct answer should have been A
24:22: to follow parallelism "Were" should be present as mentioned below: ....had to decide whether problems WERE in the fundamentals of...... Am I right?
In last question it shows only protect which isn't to+verb But in option C it's to extract which is to+verb so it's not parallel. So correct answer should be B
"With the stock price declining rapidly, analysts had to decide whether problems in the fundamentals of the company or simply a brief hysteria among market participants were driving the price downward." ----Sir u r contradicting ur own logic here. pls help me on this ..
Sir, in the architecture firm question at 32:46 the phrase "only the" is modifying concerns of the clients and not client itself. Which means that the statement should follow as the firm took only into account the concerns of its clients and not their challenges etc.. But the statement is actually meant to say that the firm only took into account the concerns of its clients and not those of the homeowners. In this case, only took is modifying clients thus contrasting it with homeowners at a later stage. Hence, "only" should appear after firm and before took. Kindly clarify.
@@animeshamar and Asif : The verb "helps" modifies methods of brewing coffee...since methods is a plural subject it will take plural verb "help"...Hope it's clear
sir in the cost cutting question we can see that the words manufacturing and forecast is not parallel . but you seem to have choosed a different path of solving it can u please elaborte why did we not take the parallelism into consideration.
ing refers to something happening at present only if u do that something at present will the future event take place. So cost cutting and .... alows/is required for to project the profit in the future. Forecasting doesnt make sense here.
@Ayush Agarwal yes the verb 'was' is for 'a brief hysteria' but sir said it is for 'price'. so yes 'was' is correct but its noun should be hysteria, not the price.
In question 15:43 The twenty four labs in the state all compete for shares of the same government allotment. Why 'all ' is used. After the comma we used 'each strive' insted of 'all strive'
@ Tech & Games Villa : In this question the point to check was that although all 24 labs were competing for shares, each of them was striving to get funding over the others...since 'each' is a singular subject it will take 'its' instead of 'their' and thus option D is the answer...
23:42 I think price is definitely not the subject here. It has something to do with the sentence structure involving 'whether...or', which means the considered subject here has be problems or hyteria. And since whether...or is a conjunction and we have seen the rule for the same in the previous videos, the first noun (problems), will be considered as the subject here. So I think A is the correct answer.
hmmmmm. i must say you are definitely wrong.
You are right,
It's the reasons which 'was' is referring to
Here 'was' is taking brief hysteria as a subject because it's near to it.
its not both but a single cause,or means they have to decide the cause not the causes
YOU GUYS ARE DOING A WONDERFUL JOB. BUT SO MANY MISTAKES IN EVERY VIDEO. FOR PEOPLE WHO CAN IDENTIFY THEM. IT IS A HUGE PROBLEM. PLEASE LOOK INTO IT.
22:19
When compound subjects are joined by or (or neither/nor)
the verb should agree with the subject that is closest to the verb.
So for brief hysteria 'was' is correct.
Thank you so much for tour classes. this is very helpful . I appreciate how calmly you explained all the concepts and thoroughly explained each and every practice questions.
Thank you once again. Keep uploading :)
Hey brother is this playlist enough for verbal prep?
Please reply and how was your cat exam went??????
tell us
@@tprasanyashroff2908 have you brought book?
31:31 here helps related with methods (plural verb)
Exactly boss
the use of 'which' after a ' , ' makes the portion as unrequired information. So the last part of the sentence corresponds to the first part of the sentence and therefore, 'helps' should be related with 'methods' and not 'antioxidants.'
agree, that's what I was looking for in the comments. But anyways answer still remains the same :)
@@saranshsharma3147 yess
...unrequired information...something which sir himself explained in his previous videos
Exactly, HELP talks about the THE BEST METHODS. Many such instances where sir completely discards his own concepts.
Thankyou!!👍
(i was confused)
31:16 doesnt makes sense to me. ANTIOXIDANTS is not HEPING to extract anyrhing. its the METHODS that HELPS to extract more flavour...etc
am i right?
Last question i think 'helps' is referring to 'methods' not to 'oxidants'. Please clearify
I too felt the same
In the last example, 'help' points to 'best methods' and not 'antioxidants', is what I think, am I right?
24:00 D is correct answer as Hysteria is a singular noun and was refers to hyteria only. But sir said noun is Price.
I can tell by seeing so many ads in one video, your hardwork tookoff the flight!
23:45 isn't it should be 'were' and not 'was' because prices aren't the subject but the factors that are driving the price down . In my opinion the correct answer should have been A
At 20:18 , i think it should be option c because inventories are.plural but rising is one action so it might be singular ,
no because after by,adverb cannot come....corresponding is right choice
23:36 Another perspective
I think "Were" is referring to "participants".
Maybe A could also be the right answer.
exactly what i am thinking.
In last question help is related to Best methods and not antioxidants
Yes..I thought so too... It does not make sense to relate help with antioxidants keeping the context of the sentence in mind.
Yes
24:22: to follow parallelism
"Were" should be present as mentioned below:
....had to decide whether problems WERE in the fundamentals of......
Am I right?
yes, even i think the correct answer is A
Here 'was' is taking brief hysteria as a subject because it's near to it.
In last question it shows only protect which isn't to+verb
But in option C it's to extract which is to+verb so it's not parallel. So correct answer should be B
18:19
Their is 'and' between 'opening' and 'developing'...making it plural , thereby making the answer as C
There*
31:45 I think the subject is best methods
so did i
@@Mnali871 +1
"With the stock price declining rapidly, analysts had to decide whether problems in the fundamentals of the company or simply a brief hysteria among market participants were driving the price downward." ----Sir u r contradicting ur own logic here. pls help me on this ..
Here 'was' is taking brief hysteria as a subject because it's near to it.
Thank you sir for all of this
Sir, in the architecture firm question at 32:46 the phrase "only the" is modifying concerns of the clients and not client itself. Which means that the statement should follow as the firm took only into account the concerns of its clients and not their challenges etc..
But the statement is actually meant to say that the firm only took into account the concerns of its clients and not those of the homeowners. In this case, only took is modifying clients thus contrasting it with homeowners at a later stage. Hence, "only" should appear after firm and before took. Kindly clarify.
23:32 so by this logic i would say 'they was driving car instead of they were driving a car' .
The sentence starts by simply a brief...... So the subject is hysteria so was is correct price is wrong subject
Really helpful for me!!! Awesome Video
In 31.24 helps refer to the methods ....if wrong explain about it sir
I absolutely agree with all the solutions. No doubts in this video. And the mix of practice questions was awesome. It incorporated all the topics.
Thank you sir, brilliant questions. 🙌
12:55 sir option 'D' also has ing at the end of the word how come option 'D' will be the right answer
Thank you so much sir.
sit thank you so much ..
hi, in 31.19
the "helps" be about brewing coffee, because of the word to extract.
answer still remains the same, kindly clarify
I believe the same
@@animeshamar and Asif : The verb "helps" modifies methods of brewing coffee...since methods is a plural subject it will take plural verb "help"...Hope it's clear
the best methods are helping not the antioxidants. (Methods - plural subject) therefore (verb - help).
@@arindam3 you are more appropriate 👍
naah.. it's modifying 'methods' which is plural therefore help
IN THE QUST BOUT STOCK PRICE..WAS IS REFERRING TO THE REASON. NOT THE PRICE.
cost cutting and restructuring wale question me manufacturing aur forecasting ko kyun nh match kiya gya?
tysm sir.....ur just awesome
sir in the cost cutting question we can see that the words manufacturing and forecast is not parallel . but you seem to have choosed a different path of solving it can u please elaborte why did we not take the parallelism into consideration.
ing refers to something happening at present only if u do that something at present will the future event take place. So cost cutting and .... alows/is required for to project the profit in the future.
Forecasting doesnt make sense here.
Thank you so much sir.❤❤
Int 23:40 the subj of the verb were is not price but the nouns presiding it.??
i feel option 'a' is correct
.
@Ayush Agarwal yes the verb 'was' is for 'a brief hysteria' but sir said it is for 'price'. so yes 'was' is correct but its noun should be hysteria, not the price.
We are talking about a brief
this is way too confusing.
In question 15:43
The twenty four labs in the state all compete for shares of the same government allotment.
Why 'all ' is used.
After the comma we used 'each strive' insted of 'all strive'
@ Tech & Games Villa : In this question the point to check was that although all 24 labs were competing for shares, each of them was striving to get funding over the others...since 'each' is a singular subject it will take 'its' instead of 'their' and thus option D is the answer...
31:33 Right answer is D
In 20:25.. Why increases in sales?? I mean why not increase in sales..
yes thats wrong too👽
There are 2 errors in this video (only in reasonings)
1last question,
2 22:00
at 30:52 isn't pumping a verb?
Voice is too too too too much low
21:00 24:00 26:00 30:00 32:00
very well explained
Very confusing....!
At 20:18 , i think it should be option c because inventories are.plural but rising is one action so it might be singular ,
D