College should be paid by taxes. Education should be free, that's how a country progresses That's one of the reasons why the US is declining to a third world country.
Free education will not fix that. It will make the issue even bigger when everyone will be able to become anyone. Basically the employer will be more likely to scrap you even more, because he can get anyone in the line.
Simple answers to complex problems are catchy and simpletons love repeating them over and over again. Oversimplification just to have someone to blame is just witch-hunting remastered, 21st century version. If investors were the main drivers, they would compulsively build more housing to drive their costs down and increase their portfolio, eventually leading to the market being oversaturated with supply and balancing itself out. However, that doesn't seem to be happening. Why is that?
Not buying a house at the age of 5 was the worst financial mistake of my life
I hear you on that one! Best thing we can do now is make the most of what we were given.
😂
You didn’t have money at 5 so that’s an invalid argument
@@V8Brah *Asian Parent voice style*
Little Chen out there already got his first house and has his own several years old company, he is 9.
I’m from van bc Canada. Not only is housing unaffordable for most, it’s such low quality nowadays too…
College should be paid by taxes.
Education should be free, that's how a country progresses
That's one of the reasons why the US is declining to a third world country.
third world country is a ridiculous exaggeration
Free education will not fix that.
It will make the issue even bigger when everyone will be able to become anyone.
Basically the employer will be more likely to scrap you even more, because he can get anyone in the line.
It is expensive housing. Without even watching the video. And housing is expensive becasue investors buy them all up. End of story.
Simple answers to complex problems are catchy and simpletons love repeating them over and over again.
Oversimplification just to have someone to blame is just witch-hunting remastered, 21st century version.
If investors were the main drivers, they would compulsively build more housing to drive their costs down and increase their portfolio, eventually leading to the market being oversaturated with supply and balancing itself out. However, that doesn't seem to be happening. Why is that?
The houses in the 1950s were heavily subsidized.
4:53 inflation-adjusted?