Not Very Testosterone
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 17 окт 2024
- Subscribe for more funny chess content, and join my Discord server at:
/ discord
Check out how I beat a 2200 Rapid player with a DUCK:
• The Guy Who HATES En P...
Music used in this video:
Honkai Star Rail - Aberrant Receptacle
#chess #ChessBut
![COLOMBIA vs. CHILE [4-0] | RESUMEN | ELIMINATORIAS SUDAMERICANAS | FECHA 10](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TDjN4W3yy1k/mqdefault.jpg)
![OhGeesy x Lefty Gunplay - What It Iz [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/L0yzW9t2ixk/mqdefault.jpg)
That should possibly count as a loss.
Coward Chess - 100% lose rate - thus proving you’re not a coward.
Simp: This probably isn't going to be so bad
Also Simp: Gets completely demolished by the challenge
Indians gonna Indian.
Simp is secretly Bizarro. If he says that challenge is impossible, that means he's gonna win. If he says that it's doable, let alone easy - the video ends prematurely.
I'm surprised that he didn't consider any fork to instantly end the video because he can't possibly retreat two pieces on the same move.
That would make the challenge basically impossible.
Even if forks are fine, pins would definitely end the video. Pretty impossible challenge
It is what I would expect from this challenge, you are supposed to avoid forks. 1:35 He should play Nc4 to force trade pieces. Less pieces mean less pieces to get attacked.
Pin lets you move attacked piece, the piece behind was not attacked so is not restricted (does not work for king obviously).
The challenge said "one of your pieces" so I think he can freely choose which one to move
Forks, discovered checks, and a double check from a 100 rated player? (I mean, they were blundering at the same time and didn't know you were doing a challenge.) But... Well done!
This guy is obviously smurfing. A true 100 rated player barely knows how pieces move. To set up any attack or coordinating pieces in the opening means this guy is at least 500-600 but he just wants to beat on noobs.
Nah, thats normal for an indian
@@lucasdacarinhawhy do people keep making this a race thing
@@maximized_1Chess originated here sooo..
And also gukesh
@@maximized_1 I like how you call "Indians are good at chess" a race thing, as if that's a derogatory statement.
I love the subtle "it's fine" when he gets an Indian player 😂
Spoiler: It wasn't fine
The 100 rated players are even blundering their Edwards now!
THE WATERFALL IS FLOWING DOWN???
Arguably the video should have ended at the Rook Bishop fork, because you only managed to move one of the pieces to an unattacked square.
I absolutely love that he calls the e pawn edward
Kabedon chess: If there is an enemy piece on the A or H file, your pieces, or pawns, that can move to the same rank in the adjacent file must go there to ask them out on a date.
3:54 I expected Simp to answer "100 rated" here
You should not have moved your rook. You should have moved your bishop. When he took the rook, you would be able to take his queen.
Game should've ended when a fork happened, since you cannot fulfill challenge requirements by retreating two pieces on one turn
If you want to get all literal, the challenge said "when one of your pieces is attacked".
When two pieces are attacked the challenge no longer applies and it's a free move.
@@GigsTaggart I hate that you are absolutely correct. I didn't think about that when I wrote the challenge.
@@GigsTaggart When two pieces are attacked, it is still true that one piece is attacked. It just so happens that another piece is attacked as well. The challenge did not say "if *exactly* one of your pieces ... is attacked", which is the language that you would need to exclude the case you are considering.
@@TheElihs The most technically correct answer here was @GigsVT's answer. The challenge wasn't "if one *or more* of your pieces...", it was "if *one* of your pieces...". *TWO* pieces is not *ONE* piece, even though the set of two pieces also contains two individual sets of one piece each.
@@davisev5225 incorrect
2:56 the bishop failed to move. Challenge already failed.
No. The challenge condition is "when one of your pieces is attacked". Here he had two pieces attacked, so he was free to do whatever he wanted.
@@rybiryj there’s nothing in the challenge that says the challenge doesn’t apply to forks
@@rybiryj that's not how logic conditional statements work
@@rybiryjIs the Bishop "one of your pieces"? yes. Was it attacked? yes. Did it move to an unattacked square? No. So challenge failed
@@rybiryj the subtlety is that: it does not say "if one of your pieces is attacked and other pieces are not attacked"
Technically, the Queen was an unattacked square, and since it was a fork, it wouldn't matter what you moved because there would be an attacked piece either way
This challenge name should be "I am a coward"
As opposted to simp always saying "I am not a coward"
**takes sip of estrogen**
bro wha
@@diliscollective9743 its a low testosterone challenge
I miss the wtf at the end. Happens rarely nowadays
Probably because Simp's seen so many nonsensical moves that nothing surprises him anymore.
it also makes it more special when it does happen
@@np8139 Not just that. If you look at his earliest challenges, they were often absurdly difficult to accomplish or very difficult to prevent. Also, back then Simp rarely tried to win, he just tried to see how long he could go before the opponent made a video-ending blunder. Nowadays, he has a clear strategy in mind to win, and the challenges are easier as well.
Two interpretations: Either auto-lose when two pieces are attacked because you can't move them both away, or it ONLY applies when "ONE of your pieces" is attacked, so multi-attacks actually give you a free move.
or it is ok to move ANY of the attacked piece.
@@Joseph-ty1xq It's a reasonable interpretation but not a literal one.
@@RupertAndCheese why it isn't? "one" can mean "any".
@@Joseph-ty1xq And if it means any, then you can't move all of them at once, thus the video ends.
@@RupertAndCheese but you can move ANY of them
Capturing that knight would technically be moving the king to an unattacked square... as long as you consider standing still a move. And anyone who has ever implemented a Markov Chain knows you have to consider standing still a move to ensure you get a stationary distribution.
Obviously as an Asian Simp knows this basic piece of scientific information. But equally obviously the point of the challenge was to change the location of attacked piece to a different square 😉.
Video should end at 2:49 because you cannot move both the bishop and the rook to unattacked squares.
Rule says "if one of your pieces is attacked", so it should not apply if two or more are attacked
He'd just be forced to spend two moves to move both pieces
@@МаксимФалалеев-я3нno, then it would says “one or more pieces”
@@Medsas I can understand your intepretation. Then he should have taken the queen. He shouldn't need to move either his bishop nor his rook
“Not very testosterone” with a person with a Madeline pfp. How fitting
Technically, the challenge forced you to retreat a piece from attacked position, not preventing you from moving a piece into an attacked position.
No, the challenge says "move it to an UNATTACKED square".
@@laszlovincze5095 If it is attacked.
also, technically, removing the attacking piece counts as moving the other piece to safety as long as it's not double attacked
0:56 I would love to see what names Chess Simp canonically gives to the pawns. Here's my best guess following the theme of Edward: Anthony, Beatrice (secret woman), Charles, Donald, Edward, Franklin, Gerald, and Hector.
I think the fork three minutes in actually just ends your video lol, since you can’t move both pieces to an unattached square at the same time
Reveal Drawback to Opponent
I like this idea, can we tweak it tho for another video? "If a piece (not pawn) is attacked, it must not be attacked on thr next move (in thr even of a fork the highest point piece takes priority as a fork would end the challenge)" sounds fair....er
The move Nf2 should have ended the video since you can’t save the rook and bishop at the same time
Fork is an automatic loss by these rules, because you cannot save both pieces
I don't understand why did Simp think that this will be an easy one. This is basically all of the:
- No check blocking (with very limited king moves at the start and middle game)
- No capturing protected pieces and pawns (which also means opponents double attacks make one of the attacking piece invulnerable on capture)
- No pieces within 1 square of opponents king (no checkmates for a while)
On top of being forced to move an attacked piece. Even if moving one piece when 2 are attacked is allowed, it would still require you to waste 2 turns (if they didn't capture)
"so many likes"
5. 😐
Surprisingly difficult to play with no testosterone.
It's always Edward ;(
They had a Madeline Celeste pfp, obviously they're not very testosterone
What about the bishop on c1? Wasn't it attacked be the knight on d3? So because 2 pieces were attacked at the same time and you can only move one, doesn't that end the video?
Challenge wording did not give any release to when you physically can't stop a piece from being attacked. You did not re-word the challenge to account for that and thus challenge failed at 2:48
Video should have ended on move 8. You didn't move your bishop to an unattacked square
4:12 I think we all know why now.
2:50 U lost there if fork then u lose bcs u cant move both
Simp what is your highest rating in standard chess?
1:16 I believe if you would played Qf3 instead, you could've gone for an easy win there
You should have played a closed position
Doesnt the fork between rook and bishop count as an even earlier loss because simp didnt move the bishop to a safe square? (He chose to move the rook, but the double attack technically fails the challenge)
I think all 100 rated players either don't know the rules or are also doing challenges.
wouldn't "ends the video" prevent the comments section? And you can only answer commemts if you actually won the challenge (or not lose)?
Didnt he do this before? Chess but its touhou one
Video 206 of asking simp to play fps chess
No counter attack on the bishop?
OMG CELESTE MADELINE CUTEFACE AVATAR USER
Whats the battle theme song?
2:49 you already lost…you didnt move the attacked bishop
but there were 2 pieces attacked, an the challenge only reacts if there is one attack
yo didnt know a hsr player plays chess too
2:48 the video should end right there. The challenge tells you to move both a rook and a bishop, and you can move only one.
"You'll never know why this comment has so many likes" **Bro has 5 likes**
Tren
Not the best challenge ever
he said "absolutely winnable" so i'll predict he wil get absolutely destroyed, i'll be back with an update once i'm finished watching
Update: i was right
3rd
1st
1st
1st