Comparing SONY A7III vs A6300 - Is The DIFFERENCE WORTH SWITCHING? (Filmmaking Review)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 18 окт 2024
- My NEW digital products for filmmakers ► shop.tomstrelle...
In this video I compare the new SONY A7III to my A6300 - let's see which is the best camera in 2018!
Find the best music for your videos on ARTLIST + 2 FREE months ► bit.ly/ArtlistTS
Video graded using my ESSENTIAL FILM LUT Collection ► sellfy.com/p/s...
My KIT ► kit.com/TomStr...
Follow me on INSTAGRAM ► / tomstreller
tomstreller.com
____________________________________
(The above are affiliate links, meaning Amazon will kick a small percentage back to me if you purchase something! This helps me keep this channel going.)
#SonyA7III #A6300 #BestCamera2018
Bro you didn't take any A6300 Bokeh shots.. to compare. You should've shot the butterflies with the a6300 as well, would've helped.
yesssssssssssss
a6300 have sharpness issue with 1080p which is known, However 4k videos are as close as Full frame, as its 6K binning to 4k.
I upgraded from my beloved a6300 to the A7III. The little a6300 is a great camera, but man...the A7III has been blowing me away.
I upgraded, too 😄 the Camera is awesome, especially for that price and if you shoot both photo and video, I think it is the best deal right now!
@@TomStreller Oh definitely. It's a CRAZY value. I'm a hybrid shooter (RUclips and photos) but I'm thinking about picking up a used A7Rii for a bit more photo goodness. Talk about value! You can find them on eBay for SUPER cheap!!
im downgrade from a7iii to a6300, hehe
IMPORTANT BUYING GUIDE: Media Company = A7iii || Filmmaker = A6300.
Why I say a6300 for Filmmakers is because you need to spend that extra money on other equipment. A good prime lens, lighting equipment, sound equipment, ND Filters, etc. If you're making movies a6300 is more than enough and you'll find that the quality of the story you're telling is way more important. I do both with an a6300 and people are always impressed with the video quality.
PLUS: A media company can make that extra buck fast so it makes sense to invest more.
A C if you can, absolutely get the a6600. There’s no time limit or overheating on it compared to all the other versions you just mentioned that all suffer from that. Better ibis too I believe. I’ve been shooting videos professionally for 3 years with the a6300. It’s overheated a couple times and I nodded the software to take the time limit off.
@@DjRosG Agreed, but now there's the Sony a7c at the exact price of an a6600 except it's exactly the a7iii with better focus and color.
@A C, the IBIS isn't as essential as a filmmaker but this really all depends. It's certainly a little bit more work to get around limitations but for things like IBIS, I bought a gimbal instead of paying full price of a better camera and got a decent lens. For the overheating I use dummy batteries now that plug into a powerbank (HOURS of footage before it runs out + it took me about 1hr to overheat of somewhat continuous recording). But if you got the money, I'd say get the a7C because that is looking to be a promising camera. Not worth investing in a7siii unless your art is giving you $5k a month. You'd be surprised at how impressed clients can be with an a6000
Love this video Tom! I’m also using the a6300 with the 18-35 sigma. Still really happy with this camera and the image that’s coming out of it. The only thing that bothers me sometimes is the lack of image stabilization and rolling shutter. Do you have any tips on shooting handheld with this setup (in 4K). Keep up the good videos, greetings from Holland! 🙏🏼
Not really, man - I rarely shoot 4k and don't have a lot of fast movement in my videos, so I never really experienced a huge amount of rolling shutter 😬 and for stabilisation I use a gimbal most of the time 🤙
How is autofocus?
Tom Streller what gimbal do you use with that combo?
AF is great and I use the Crane 2
I hate my sigma 18-35 cause of the sound
everything is worth to switch as long u have money, I use both camera and if the 6300 get 7.5 the a7iii should get 8,5 not to far, and the prices if a6300 is 5 and a7iii should be 15 , and gmaster lens is more expensive than a7iii body. so its good to upgrade as long u have the money but if u don't have it or don't really need it I think u should focus with ideas and creativity.
Did you mean Tamron 28-75 2.8? Bc you put 24-70? Or were you referring to an older Canon Tamron?
Danke dir Tom, das war nochmal der finale Impuls die A7III für mein Film Team zu besorgen. Freue mich auf das Upgrade :-). LG Gordon
I kept them both and still find qualities with the 6300a a good amount packed in the box ... the 6300a is alsopocket friendly with a GM 35mm... without going point and shoot. Get some fast glass anyway right? Thanks for the comp!
Hi which one is better for 4k out !
Sony alpha 6300 is good?
Is this Daniel Schiffer with lightning bolt neon? xD
I too felt the same 😂😂😂
Thank you! I’m in the market for a full frame and glad you did this video
Thanks mate - now I'm really keen for the next video :-)
Haha thanks man - appreciate it! Stay tuned for next week!☺️
Great video!
I'm thinking about buying an a7iii as an upgrade from the a6500 🙈
Full frame is toooooo nice 😍
I had a GH5 for a studio production and in my opinion it didn't perform as good as the a7iii 🤷🏼♂️
Yeah now everybody is talking about how nice the GH5 is 😬 I guess I really have to give it a try.. if it wasn’t for the MFR sensor!
I have also the a6500 I want to go for the a7 lll because for video the a6500 it's really great but for photos it horrible compared with my old canon 6d .
@@TomStreller was ist ein MFR Sensor?
MFT
@@NAM3L3555
Horrible???????
LIke all... the b-roll except the miss focused waterfall shoot was from the a7iii so whats to compare ?
Robin Andersson exactly
thank you for sharing your review Tom! clear pro and friendly :)
🙏🙏🙏
Second hand market 500 usd vs 1500 usd not enough worth to pay the 1k differance
Hi. I've heard the screen darkens on the A6300 when filming in 4K. Does anyone know whether an external monitor would darken if used with it? Thanks
The external monitor doesn't darken from my experience.
Ich hatte schon Angst, dass ich nichts verstehe, weil ich von englischen Fachbegriffen im Bereich Fotografie keine Ahnung habe, aber ich habe dennoch alles verstanden. Liegt vielleicht auch daran, dass du ebenfalls aus Deutschland bist und dann nicht so schnell redest wie Muttersprachler. Super Video! Habe bereits die a6300 und möchte auch die Sony a7iii und stattdessen meine Nikon d7100 aufgeben.
I’m a big fan that you stick to the Sony a6300 ;)
Amazing video Tom!! I have an a6500 and if you dont mind, could you share the settings you normally use on your 6300/A7 III
Thanks my man - just check out my settings video, I Walk you through all my main settings for Sony cameras!
Great video. You mentioned the Tamron lens being similar to your Sigma 18-35mm when shooting on the a7iii. I'm in the process of considering the switch to the a7iii for the need of IBIS and I'm starting to take on more photography shoots and I see the a7iii could really help me in those two areas.
What would you recommend as the closest lens to give me the same results or better (sharpness, auto-focus speed) than what I'm used to with my current setup, a6300 and Simga 18-35mm and MC-11 adapter? i really don't feel I need to switch, but sometimes I shoot concerts or I'm on the run and just need those extra features in my a6300.
Thanks in advance for your help. I subbed, and plan to check out your other videos. Great channel.
I feel you, my friend! As for the focal range, the Tamron is pretty close to the Sigma, you can zoom in even a bit more. It is also pretty sharp, good color reproduction and the price is decent. Other than that, maybe the G-Master 24-70 would be a good option for you, too.
I recently preferred shooting prime lenses the most - especially since the A7III gives you this handy APS-C mode. Works great for me. And here I only shoot Sigma ART primes, since I feel they are the best image quality for the price.
@@TomStreller Man thank you so much for the reply. Yes I've though about some Sigma Primes as well. Good point about the APCS mode. Could you maybe show some examples of the sigma 18-35 in apsc mode on the a7iii vs the tamron. Maybe I can still shoot with my Sigma and just grab a couple of wide angle primes instead of ditching my sigma 18-35.
Don't have the 18-35 anymore, so I can't show you any examples, sorry! But I tried it and it worked as good as on the A6300. But personally, I would rather go with the Tamron to make use of the Fullframe sensor 😉
The only 2 things that stop me from buying the a7III are the lack of 60p in 4K and the viewfinder that has not been updated.
The A7III is a much better camera. I use it as a "B" cam to my Sony FS7.
Chris Bishop rich
Mm I’ll still with my A6300 no big diff
Are you from Germany? If yes where's the best place to get kamera and gear?
Amazon
hi, super interesting as point of view and very objectf. I would like your opinion. in France the a6300 costs 800 € with kit lens. a6400 is a 1150 with lens kit. Do you think the A6300 is worth it again? with the difference I can buy a gimbal or sigma! I do not care about the pivotable screen at the top!
Hi, is the Sony a6300 4K video easier to edit than the a7111 in your opinion?
A7RII is a better deal than the A7III. The only problem is it can overheat from long video recording, but for photography it's a beast.
Good point but you need to consider ergonomics, battery life etc. too - and since the A7RII and A7III come in both for around 2000 bucks, in my opinion the A7III is the better camera overall.
I don't think that matters much when you have 5 axis stabilization. A lot of the "safety" practices are no longer relevant, unless you're photographing a wedding and want to make sure you get the best variation of expressions in a given moment. For most photography, you don't need to take huge bursts of shots eating up your battery. If you're taking 1000 photo's and using less than 1% of your shots, you can probably up your technique and bring that to 20%, which would mean you'd use effectively 20 times less battery....and if you don't need 20 batteries, then obviously you can do with that one charge that you previously did with 2-4 batteries.
The A7RII should be cheaper though, somewhere in the $1500-$1700 range. The only thing the A7III has over the R2, is pixel shift (which can be useless for any scene with movement, and negated by the high MP count of the R2)....and you might be able to get away with cheapo lenses, in the sense that if the lens can't resolve the 42MP of the R2, then it's not really going to have a massive advantage over the R2....but the R2 with a sharp lens is amazing.
The opposite side of that coin is since it has virtually double the megapixels, you can more effectively crop. You can save money on lenses in that way by needing less lenses. So maybe you buy two really good lenses instead of 4 average lenses, which is going to matter a great deal when you upgrade to an A74 or something in the future because you'll have good lenses that can handle the higher MP count. A lens that is sorta sharp on the A7III is going to be very unsharp when all camera's are 42mp+, which puts a sort of short shelf life on these lenses. Lenses that do ok with 24MP today aren't going to hold up in 10-20 years.
But most photographer's change out gear yearly or even every 6 months....I'm more of a long term buyer....and 42MP is going to be much more relevant in 10 years than 24MP.
You realise that this channel is mainly about videography, right? All the things you mention are nice and true but are worthless when it comes to filming. Way better battery life, better ergonomics, etc. are a huge deal when filming with a camera so in this field the A7III is clearly ahead of the A7RII.
This whole "crop in post" mentality just drives me nuts, it's the same with filmmakers shooting in 4k and crop all the way to 1080p just because they can't frame a shot in the first place.
The ability of cropping is just a lazy tool when you are not able to frame correctly. And you also don't take into consideration that you choose a lens not only because of the focal length itself but because of the look certain focal lengths produce and their compression.
There's nothing wrong with cropping a bit because f.i. you got your rule of thirds a bit off but to just make up for bad framing is.. wrong.
And I don't think "42MP is going to be much more relevant in 10 years than 24MP", that just doesn't make sense.. or do you think that in 10 years we all are going to watch our photos on huge billboard-like screens?
@@TomStreller thanks for the video - interesting comparison. I'm thinking about adding a Sony to my canon universe... let's see if that happens. Regarding the 4k shooting I agree nearly 100%....but :-) there's always a but. If you use 4k as let's say b-cam you nearly have also a c-cam since you can crop in and make the edit a bit more dynamic. Ideally you'd shoot with the right lens and the right framing, but sometimes it would just be an overkill of gear to bring. Other than that... best to shoot exactly what you want to have, with the right framing, otherwise you have to shoot twice: on set and in editing - not very useful.
I have both the a7r2 and a6500 - they compliment each other ofr photography and videography
Finally...Thnkx god
Why my Sony a6300 hundred say unable to read the memory card if u have solution please make the video plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz
What's the issue man? Maybe I can help
Te falto mencionar algo muy importante, la diferencia en el sensor. 👍👍 buen video. 👍🇨🇴
good video
When you record video in 4k in the sony a6300 the screen is reduced to half brightness.
With the sony a7iii or a6500 it happens the same?
Nope it doesn't. Neither on the a6400. I hate this
Very good video with a lot of information. I really liked the song - what is it called?
Great review. Thinking of get the a6500 as a b cam for my a7iii. The problem is that the gh5 is same price as a6500 here in Sweden 🤓
Hm, that’s a good deal! But I have to say I now love the bigger sensor - MFT just doesn’t look that good 😬
I had both the a6500 and the gh5 and now I own the a7iii and I honestly miss the gh5. Although you don't get as much low light performance and the depth of field can't get as shallow, there are just some things about the gh5 that make it the best all around cam for video work (ibis, ergonomics, reliability, weather sealing, etc).
Maybe I need to get a GH5 as well to compare them!
Ciaran Giroux yeah I think I will like it for these reasons, as a camera for filmmaking and the a7 for photos. When I need the low light I can always use my a7iii.
Tom: what did you like the most about lumix?
The ergonomics are great, as well as the battery and the overall user experience.. it‘s just the small sensor that took me away from them 😬
great video!
02:25 "But it's still not a swivvel screen."
Great video Tom, but I am completely perplexed as to why a filmmaker would want a swivvel screen. For me they are slow, obtrusive and conspicious. I hate them and it is one of the reasons I would never consider a Canon.
Haha I totally feel you! I actually don't care about the swivel screen thing at all, mostly because I was rarely using it on my GH4 before, for RUclips videos, client jobs etc I have an external monitor and also it gets in the way on a gimbal. I think it's a really unnecessary feature - but a lot of people seem to care about it, so I included this info 😬
Tom Streller I’m one of those people that really care about it. It has helped in so many instances with non-fiction, documentary style shooting, especially in situations where I wanted to get right down low, and still frame the shot well. Moments like, for example, flipping the Glidecam upside down to get the camera super close to the road, and moving camera up. Keeping that framing consistent in a real-world situation would have been impossible without the swivel screen.
It also goes without saying, that talking to a camera for the purposes of shooting yourself, is infinitely easier with a swivel screen. A fiction filmmaker would have the time to line things up and plan ahead. Us non-fiction folks love the swivel.
Great video
Ich hab auch die A7III und bin an sich auch soweit zufrieden damit allerdings finde ich dass das Bild was produziert sieht bei mir immer recht "komisch" aus um das mal so auszudrücken. Und hast du die A7III behalten? Wenn ich ja hätte eine Bitte an dich. Etwas zu prüfen da ich nicht weiß ob das an der Kamera normal ist oder nicht. Aber an sich gutes Video. Wäre für eine Antwort dankbar.
Hab sie nicht behalten.. aber später gekauft 😄 was meinst du denn mit komisch?
@@TomStreller So gehts auch^^. Also ich habs das erste mal bemerkt als ich mit nem externen Mikrofon aufgenommen habe. (Es liegt nicht am Mikro) Man hört dann so eine Art dumpes brummen. Hab dann natürlich erstmal ein wenig rumgetestet. Hab das Mikro an die Kamera angeschlossen und es in der Hand gehalten (man hört kein brummen) und auf die Kamera gesetzt (man hört ein Brummen). So dieses "Brummen" kann man auch hören wenn man ein Ohr an den Body hält. Um mal zum Punkt zu kommen... ist es an sich nur die Frage ob du deine Kamera anmachen könntest und mal eben selber "lauscht" ob du da was hören kannst. Kann ja sein das dies ganz normal ist. Aber man kann es halt eben hören und das ist schon störend wie ich finde. Einfach die Kamera nehmen und gegens Ohr drücken.
Das wurde jetzt grad viel mehr durcheinander als es sollte.
Aaalso, ich hab’s mal gecheckt.. ein Brummen höre ich nicht, nur ein ganz leichtes Geräusch wie bei einem Lüfter, aber eben ganz ganz leise. Ist sicher auch ein Lüfter drin.
Wenn’s so störend ist lass das doch mal checken, hast ja sicher noch Garantie drauf. Notfalls Sony Support kontaktieren und einschicken!
@@TomStreller Kann gut sein das es ein Lüfter ist aber wo soll der Hinpusten? Die RED hat nen Lüfter ja aber die Sony hat eig keinen Platz dafür. Ich weiß natürlich nicht ob wir das gleiche hören... was aber gut sein kann. Das Geräusch hört man mit dem Ohr ja auch nur wenn man es gegen den Body drückt aber komisches nicht durchs interne Mikro aber durchs Externe was kurios ist.. da sich eben diese Schwingungen auf das Mikro übertragen. Den Support habe ich einfach mal Kontaktiert und die wollen eine Aufnahme davon. Was generell kein Problem ist. Nur wenn ich herausfinden kann das es eben normal ist brauche ich sie ja nicht einschicken^^
The first part of the video sounds more like a Sony vs Canon comparison!
Why that?
Tom Streller the menus and touch screen
Can please upload a link to 1080p file I want to know how sound files is recorded at 120fps still hold the normal time code or is it s streached files. I just thinking about sycning audio video
Uff... ich weiß, das Video ist vier Jahre alt, von daher dürfte es inzwischen ziemlich egal sein, aber... ich finde die E-Gitarre wirklich extreeeem ablenkend. Ich kann dir kaum zuhören. :/
where is that light from?
What light?
Tom Streller I think he meant that LED above the speaker
One is in the back and one spot on his face.
good video
When you record video in 4k in the sony a6300 the screen resides at half brightness.
With the sony a7iii it happens the same?
Ни хуя не понятно, но очень интересно.
No low light test bro?
No
Kazik Furmanczyk a7iii obv
@@olanofilm well it would be illogical to be otherwise, but how much better is the a7iii ,a significant amount or not that noticable.
The menu and buttons are suck compare to Nikon.
Sonówka lepsza
sony a6300 image quality and depth is worse , it is only for video
lol check out my Instagram @shahterspeed ! its all Sony a6300
@@Shahterspeed Very beautiful pics.
@@prashanthb6521 Thank you 😊😊😊
@@Shahterspeed Sigma 18-35?
WOW
🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Where are you come from ?
Germany
@@TomStreller Ohne spaß das dachte ich direkt, du hasst nen leichten Deutschen Akzent xD
War aber ein gutes Video :D
Lg Ben
Ps: ich bin sehr zufrieden mit meiner a6300, werde auch nicht umsteigen ( jedenfalls nicht jetzt )da die Objektive viel zu teuer sind.
Warum machst du das Video nicht auf deutsch? Dein Englisch ist sehr schlecht zu verstehen.
Mein Englisch ist schlecht zu verstehen? Weil ich so schnell spreche oder wie? Haha, das hab ich auch noch nicht gehört 😄
not 4k video, not interested
Bist du Deutsch?
Dein Englisch ist so perfekt . Wow
Haha danke - ja bin ich!
Nach der Begrüßung hat man schon gemerkt, dass er deutsch ist. Der Akzent spricht für sich. Die Aussprache klingt nicht wie ein native speaker.
Если бы ещё это было на русском!
red einfach deutsch