10 Breakthrough Technologies of 2024 | SXSW 2024
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 мар 2024
- Portuguese and Spanish language translations for SXSW 2024 Keynotes and Featured Sessions presented by Itaú
Each year, MIT Technology Review reporters and editors assemble a list of the top breakthrough technologies that will change the world. This list is one of our most popular packages of the year. Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau, the Publisher and CEO of MIT Technolgy Review will share the publication’s list of ten breakthrough technologies with the SXSW audience, explaining each one and how it will impact the way we live and work.
About SXSW:
SXSW dedicates itself to helping creative people achieve their goals. Founded in 1987 in Austin, Texas, SXSW is best known for its conference and festivals that celebrate the convergence of the interactive, film, and music industries. An essential destination for global professionals, SXSW features sessions, showcases, screenings, exhibitions, professional development and a variety of networking opportunities. For more information, please visit sxsw.com.
Subscribe: ruclips.net/user/sxsw?sub_...
Connect with SXSW:
Website: www.sxsw.com
Facebook: / sxswfestival
Twitter: / sxsw
Instagram: / sxsw
RUclips: / sxsw 
Наука
1. Generative AI.
1.1 - 19:27 A.I. for everything.
1.2 - 21:49 Copyright Law
1.3 - 23:20 Jobs
1.4 - 24:13 Misinformation
1.5 - 26:02 Cost of A.I.
1.6 - 27:43 Existential risk
1.7 - 28:54 Killer App
2. - 31:04 Super Efficient Solar Cells
3. - 32:12 Apple Vision Pro
4. - 34:07 Weight Loss Drugs
5. - 36:34 Enhanced Geothermal Systems
6. - 38:57 Chiplets
7. - 40:45 CRISPR
8. - 43:34 Exascale Computers
9. - 45:51 Heat Pumps
10. - 47:19 Twitter Killers
11. - 49:15 Vote for MIT Review's 11'th emerging tech to watch
50:36 What didn't make the list.
Thank you. This was genuinely helpful.
Seriously! Ty so much!
My you knees be healthy 🙏🙏🙏 ty!
52:55 Re: M/M reproduction. Solves the conundrum posed by de Grey's longevity escape velocity, which Kurzweil predicts for 2029, that would preclude F gestation?
Oh thank god. 18 minutes in before we get to the meat of this talk. Is the audience at SXSW unusulally patient? :)
This video taught me a valuable lesson: read the comments before watching a video to save time.
wadsworth constant
Thanks for the important lesson.
If MIT Tech Review is a liberal technology brief then I am not interested.
Fracking technology used for geothermal caused an earthquake in Korea? Earthquake of less than 2.0 Richter scale. So what! Shale oil has produced stable supply of energy for US and our allies during Russian invasion.
AI has no practical uses but energy hog? It may threaten your magazine job, but it allows us to counter cyberattacks from nations that doesn’t value democratic values.
Then the talk starts off with very lengthy sales pitch for her job. My positive view of MIT has been altered forever!
Ya. She’s a Harris affirmative action hire 😆
Yup, after watching this I have lost 40 minutes of my life, no wonder "journalists" don't exist because if they are like her they shouldn't........lousy report, messy, unorganized etc.....
@@kulkrafts3143 SEE IF YOURE TALKING THE SAME IF USA SUFFERS AN EARTHQUAKE FOR SOMETHING CHINA DOES :)
Content starts 18 minutes in. First 17 minutes are an advertisement for the speaker’s employer, a magazine.
Yes! Why? What was she thinking? Not sure if it is actually counterproductive, but can’t be a good thing either!
Thank you!
makes me wonder if she had a word count quota or smth to fulfill. bringing up unrelated topics is exactly the way i'd bloat up a presentation with a minimum time requirement
even worse, it seems that that entire spiel was her trying to guilt trip the audience into supporting the industry she's a part of, without any regard as to why said industry is losing that support
Thank you for saving me time!
so much hubris. Took too much time promoting herself. And then her first point is "AI for everything." ZZZZzzz So glad I did not wait in line to see this live.
First 15 minutes could be 2 minutes of advertising for MIT Technology review. You can probably skip if you are looking for the 10 Breakthrough technologies.
Agree, and the rest seems agenda driven.
If you have an hour to cover 10 technologies and you spend 18 minutes advertising your magazine, you might want to change the title of your talk
True
also seems there is more than those 18min of ads, wonder how much that pharmaceuticals payed them to bring up their products when there are probably dozens of more revolutionary technologies
then elon ofc lol
Too much waffle
Be nice. She already told you journalists are suffering.
is it just me or does this presentation watch more like a student trying to give a class presentation than a professional journalist discussing advanced technology
Liberal Arts student bent on liberal agenda. Not what I am looking for in SXSW talks.
@@kulkrafts3143 hey at least liberals arent trying to end democracy. we might be many things but we aint eviI ....unlike your ilk
@@kulkrafts3143 What does liberal mean?
You’ll see others commenting this too, but I want to emphasize that during the heat pump section, she stated a common mistruth, which heat pumps don’t work in colder climates. That has been incorrect for nearly ten years now. People even use them now in near-arctic regions, and as someone who lives near this journalist, I can confirm they do work in the Boston region, and I’m getting mine next month.
Do you have any evidence of this I can review? I have been exposed to her opinion repeatedly. Thanks
Small correction: @46:00
Heat pumps do work in cold climate, even in Norway during winter, so they should work in Greater Boston to 😊
so inefficient in many cases tho, great commercially and for big spaces
Ooops, BIG hit on credibility.
List starts at 19:00
tanks
Don't waste your time listening to this.
Heat pumps are all over Canada. And in case you don't know, Canada is COLD!
You would hope to keep this type of session to be about facts instead of disparaging x/Twitter for one of the topics.
I should have glanced at the comment section before wasting 15 minutes on the initial part of this video
wow this makes me never want to have anything to do with that magazine ever
Yeah, wow
If MIT Tech Review is liberal technology brief with inaccurate technical information then I am not interested.
Fracking technology used for geothermal caused an earthquake in Korea? Earthquake of less than 2.0 Richter scale. So what! Shale oil has produced stable supply of energy for US and our allies during Russian invasion.
AI has no practical uses but energy hog? It may threaten your magazine job, but it allows us to counter cyberattacks from nations that doesn’t value democratic values.
And MIT heat pumps doesn’t work in winter ;)
Then the talk starts off with very lengthy sales pitch for her job. My positive view of MIT has been altered forever!
Thanks for sharing this list.
However, how is X competitors a technical achievement?
Also, heat pumps can be used all over the US for quite a while now.
woke virus infected organization. no wonder the media is dieing
I think she mentioned that the distributed nature of the Twitter competitors and their focus on personal moderation was the breakthrough.
This video described why I should be an MIT Technology Review subscriber.
Unfortunately, it demonstrates why I’m not.
This video actually showed me, why I don’t want to be a MIT magazine subscriber
This will be probably the case study how presenters got replaced by AI bots talking about big technology.
damn twitter and their damned....free speech
free speech? you know musk went on a censorship rampage when he took over twitter, banning anyone critical of him and leftist journalists.
Terrible on all levels. Everything mentioned has already happened in 2023 or prior. And ending with talk of twitter killers as breakthrough tech, omg - this is MIT??
This is MIT for Dummies. Not what I was expecting and frankly a waste of an hour for everyone involved.
"SXSW staff members assembled on August 12, 2023 as a vendor in partnership with the Transgender Education Network of Texas (TENT), and marching alongside other local businesses and organizations down historic Congress Avenue"..This from SXSW Websie...Now i understand the anti Twitter sentiment
This magazine seems … like a magazine. At least they admit they don’t even pick the list. 💰
a great reminder about journalism. I actually never considered supporting journalism before and definitely think it's way more important than anything else listed. great talk
I love how she is a proponent of retraining workers in other fields after being displaced, but is grasping at every last straw to avoid accepting that she may also be in need of some retraining.. 😂
OMG get on with it!!!!!
Great talk - good points. You may find that the intro is a bit long and not really on point, but it does raise an important issue about tech journalism being pressured. Also it was very well delivered
Best new use of AI, replace nervous South by Southwest speakers with robotics
I need this... please say it. MIT changed our moment to bring tech to healthcare.
Lots me at the applause for “twitter killers”. Has no one read the twitter files? How about fb and google killers??
If magazines charged a reasonable price...like $10/year... they'd probably get at least 10 million subscribers which gives a $100M operating budget.
Journalists became opinion peace writers 😂
Sand batteries, the regenerative grid concept, AI tutors, solid oxide electrolyzers, forest bathing, hysata electrolyzers, metal powders for green heat, and induction stoves should be on the list at some point.
...Forest bathing? How so? (as a breakthrough technology)
@@TimpanistMoth_AyKayEll It is a Japanese phenomenon.
@@FlameofDemocracy Okay. I've heard of it, I just wouldn't categorize it as a "breakthrough technology." Was wondering if there was something else going by that name that I'd missed!
@@TimpanistMoth_AyKayEll Not understanding something is OK. That is life.
noteworthy that after your slams on Musk (Twitter killers section), of the options for future topics to be voted, 1 is specifically deals with Starship, a SpaceX product, another with robotaxi - the Tesla plans for which Musk has announced he'll be revealing more details on 8/8.
wow, in complete denial of the existential risks of ai and the twitter (X!) killers at the end was childish
052:00
Releasing particles in the atmosphere that people are going to BREATHE
chrisakes 🙄
even jumping to the 18 min start point this is waffle on top of waffle.
With all due to respect to Ms. Bramson-Boudreau - and I really wanted to hear what she had to say, she was not in a healthy state to give this presentation. She's very clearly in a heightened sympathetic nervous system, a flight-or-fight state, and trying to hear what she's saying is anxiety inducing for those of us listening. She's obviously upset about the death of her industry - which is completely understandable, but when she's there to highlight the greatest new tech we should look forward to, she needed to convey optimism and excitement. Instead, she conveyed the anxiety and nervousness of losing media as an industry.
Obviously, the situation we've now come to is tragic, but she needed to channel that into passion for the industry and present options for how we can help save it.
We can't inspire and motivate if we don't see solutions or believe something better is possible.
But in a world of infinite possibilities, something better is ALWAYS possible. We just need to do the work to make it happen. ✊️🙏💝
wow... such an effort.
RAG will be on the list next year.
They should have a better speaker present - really skattered and unpolished
They're worried about the American public.I'm worried about their extreme bias and attempt to sway public opinion away from true innovators, pioneers, and mavericks.
Interesting content, aside from MIT commercial that went on forever it seemed.
It would be great to have a presenter that was more concise and had a greater understanding of the technologies.
You showed a pew survey results about the confidence or value of science. But you showed that during the years of covid where the CDC and NIH showed their serious flaws and inconsistency. So I am not shocked by the decline.
When will we get the tech that works out how to allow all people to not be taken in by advertising, so that they get to do what is truly in their own interests vs the interests of those pimping things like: crap food and then drugs to deal with the impact of eating it, addictive tech and drugs to help people cope with the impact?
Could have left out the first 20 minutes of soliloquy about the collapse of "corporate" dictated media as a negative thing, it isn't.
Super Dry presentation
11:00
This is a great talk to discourage subscription to MIT review.
It might have been better as a 20 minute talk
Would it be the largest red flag not the reddest of red flags? Hey, but I’m no MIT journalist.
How is Graphene not on this list?
So "twitter killers" are break through technologies? And you even said Elon Musk it the greatest Twitter Killer. So are you saying Elon is the best Breakthrough Technology this year?
She was pretty careful to say that she wasn't endorsing any technology mentioned nor was she assigning morality to them like good or bad.
52:55 Re: M/M reproduction. Solves the conundrum posed by de Grey's longevity escape velocity, which Kurzweil predicts for 2029, that would preclude F gestation?
After the fiascos of the past 10 years with scientists and technical journals. Paying for them is the last thing I want to do.
Independent sources are often more trusted.
The fact that it took you 19 entire minutes to just get to your list is representative of your industries disconnect with modern media consumers.
Storage of solar clean energy to heat in sand under the ground to then heat your water and run a/c ... and revolving power cylindars like Torus is making ... and hanging photovalic cells in building siding.... so much we can do
What do super computers do? What functions When they consume so much energy
Typo alert "Publisher and CEO of MIT Technolgy Review "
SCIENCE KNOWLEDGE (among writers & media) is fading fast. Few readers are paying for content
Looking forward to 2035
This video actually showed me, why I don’t want to be a MIT magazine subscriber. And lost my interest in what their opinion on the 10 technologies might be. If they are not able to master a presentation and deliver outstanding keynote? Why to bother?
How the hell can she make such a general statement about job losses to AI? This idea that people might need to be retrained but will not lose their jobs applies to every kind of job? Utterly ridiculous especially when the economic incentive for most companies in any industry to use AI is so they can save on labor costs.
Totally agree. She spoke about retraining people in such a dismissive, shallow and thoughtless manner that she made me think of clueless ruling elites in dystopian sci-fi movies.
Hmmm...expected better from MIT Tech Review...was considering subscribing to this, till now.
So, question everyone has - No Answers !
Are MIT haters (envious/jealous) of Elon Musk? Why isn't space colonization in the mix?
Probably because it isn't happening in 2024?
yeah theyre jealous of elon musk. they didnt lkiss his backside for an hour long so it must mean theyre just jealous..... by the way no serious thinking person thinks we are going to colonise space. youve watched too much joe rogan/lex fraudman if you think that
This MIT is purposefully not seeing the elephant in the room. Just as Vasco da Gama is credited with exploration in the 15th century that led Europe out into the age of exploration, Musk is leading the effort for the preservation of human consciousness in the universe (in a world where the crazy woke culture taking over and leading us to self-destruction.)
I've got it, It's just struck me like a machete!!!!
The Alzheimer's disease drug concerns me deeply as a health care provider, an acupuncturist, and a nutrition expert. The clarity provided by the reduction of existing plague within the brain, may become addictive, as the consumer may have a sense of invincibility and revert to consumption of foods which have generated the initial and existing plague. Using the drug as an insurance policy, against the change which was developed in patient due largely to the dietary choices made. In other words, I have concerns about using a drug so that a behavior change does not become necessary may backfire. And when there is no more plague, how will the patient know to stop taking the drug? Monitoring will become a necessary component of this drug.
“Never listen to journalists” Nassim Taleb
This lady needs to get her act together
I was very interested in what you had to say until you came to Twitter. You lost all your credibility by slowing your bias into the linking. This puts everything you have said into question. So disappoint.
She's super worried about bias in the system but has no problem flaunting her own personal biases.. 😂
I wish presenters stop their "tsk-ing", it's really annoying with loudspeakers.
Most of the ai timelines are not accurate.
1
Waste of time...go to direct to 49:11 and you have a supposed list of "Breakthrough Technologies of 2024"
Is it seriously being deminished, or is it being ignored?
Hi I'm Ariful Islam leeton im software developer and members of the international organization WHO and members of the international telecommunications and international Students since and technology and co founder open A. I
You seem like a very nice lady. It’s unfortunate you chose to speak negatively about Elon Musk. He is human. He is imperfect. He may even have autism. But he is also one of if not the most important person in tech history.
Power demans? And no small innovations?
You said Ukraine, Russia I wasn’t aware that Ukraine was Russia❓
Blue sky has a good future. It is amazing source of knowledge and information.
Robotics?
summarized it with a chrome gpt plugin without watching it. the presenter stumbles from topic to topic. basically a so-so made summary. nothing new here if you haven't lived under a rock the last few months.
Must admit, I was really looking forward to this video but quickly became unimpressed for something drawn up in 2024 from a place as prestigious as MIT once was.
Advertisement followed by ok at best news followed by what sounds like political statements which are half baked without facts… aren’t they supposed to be unbiased and factual?
I think that may explain why their reputation and support from the public is diminishing quickly.
@52:52 Male+Male= ?
she mentioned that it still produces an egg. and i'm sure it's not the same as a bird egg, so it sounds like it'll still need a female to be involved in the process
My gosh how verbose
The collapse of journalism has began with the punishment of Julian Assange. Free Julian now and you might be able to stop that collapse.
I think a good technology would be a remote in the hands of the audience so that your talk can be sped up. 10x). I don't know who you are copying...Oscars, Tim cook, Nadella, Google guy....but it's not helping.....
Ani twitter drive. Now with CRISPI using african as Lab rat.
lol this is the funniest comment section ever
WHAT 2mln for each sickle cell treatment F. F. SKE
A.I. can probably write better articles than human counterparts. MIT paper started off good but went to some bribble in it. Arxiv is probably better also. Why would I want to read articles with bias/slants from things like political or religious ideologies. I do think science and technology should be shared, but the walled areas such. Go get some students to calculate the antimatter island of stability. Or generative A.I. to help make your paper. As she shows they want to push crap over A.I. generative. You will want to make your own systems to get around censorship from repressive scum/governments. Algorithmic trading, genetic engineering, threat detection, ect..
How has Siri sucked for 13 years?
When do they decide to tell the truth because so often the reporter is nowadays twist the truth or lie❓
20 minutes and still no content? Maybe that's the problem?
Apple vision pro, lol
Well, she spent as much time on heat pumps (what??) as on AI, and about 10x as much time as either on what MIT is, what her magazine is, how people don't seem to want to pay for information that is blah blah blah I tuned out and skipped ahead. And thank GOD, because now I know that 2024 will be a huge year for heat pump technology. Apparently.
The progressives seethe at the fact that Musk ad the audacity to buy twitter. Most of this presentation was boring and once she got to the Elon hate I finally figured out why.
Спасибо Удачно Выбрали Способ Донесения Информации Двойное Удовольствие 1Красивая Девушка Расказывает Размахивая Руками Нажимает На Кнопочки Показывает Умные Картинки 2Прорывные Инновации Которые Могут Принести Миллиарды Долларов
Ette /not sure
I love MIT Review magazine, but this was a total waste of my time. This presenter clearly reads materials that she doesn't understand. Most of the "new technologies" are at least 2-3 years old. A lot of small mistakes amount to a presentation that lack credibility.