Sansi 70W LED Grow Light Review

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 16 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 4

  • @daxiong3284
    @daxiong3284 3 года назад

    Thank you!! The Amazon listing for this product is using your vid and you helped me see that this unit really wasn't what I though it would be.

  • @DJSnafu
    @DJSnafu 2 года назад +1

    Great insightful video. Any suggestions for something to light a 6ft monstera? Caveat is i can't hang it, so a unit like this that i can place somewhere and tilt would be ideal if something exists to your knowledge.

  • @NvrBst
    @NvrBst Год назад +1

    dude, are you honestly comparing a Mars TS 1000 (150w - 130$ retail) to a SANSI 70w (60$ retail)... One being IP66 and the other IP65 no-less LOL. Anyway, I know the review is 3 years old, but, PPFD is a lot better when measuring LEDs and is the only thing really listed for any Mars or SANSI now-a-days. A better compare:
    MARS TS 1000, IP65, 150W, 343 umol/m2/s, 130$ USD MSRP - DIMMING - daisy chainable
    SANSI 70W, IP66, 70W (or 50W), 286.6 umol/m2/s, 60$ USD MSRP
    It seems like when you left your indoor growing to a "more efficient grow light" is was actually less efficient if we can trust the manufactures PPFD @ 1 foot measurements hehe :). Anyway I don't own either (yet), but if your going to compare two products like you did at the end you really should not choose something that is over double the retail price, also, not even listing what you thought the MARS TS 1000 luminous flux was is a low blow to SANSI.
    > Really if you bring another product into a review, you should pop up a descent side-by-side compare (PPDF/watt, PPDF/USD$, etc), especially when your saying it's hands down better, so much better that your only going to use the SANSI crap for non-grow lighting tasks.

  • @markbsb7176
    @markbsb7176 3 года назад

    Not “fake” they say it is equivalent to a 70w but it is only using 45-50w. Many companies do this.