Evaluating Classifiers: Kolmogorov-Smirnov Chart (K-S Chart)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 17 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 17

  • @MrElliptific
    @MrElliptific 4 года назад +1

    Thank you for the very clear examples. I was trying to refresh my understanding of the KS-test and it was super clear and well explained. Cheers!

    • @karannchew2534
      @karannchew2534 3 года назад

      On the contrary, I find it super unclear. What exactly are the SCORE and COUNT?
      At 5:00 Score=0-100,
      Number of Positive=3
      Number of Negative=62
      What does it mean?!

    • @ira3883
      @ira3883 3 года назад

      @@karannchew2534 1-100 is the range of the score. 3 and 62 are positive and negative score that fall in that range..
      But the cumulative calculation part is still unclear to me..can anyone please explain hoe to calculate that one..

  • @karannchew2534
    @karannchew2534 3 года назад

    5:00 What exactly is the COUNT? The number of PREDICTED positive (targeted) and negative (non-targeted) outcome?

  • @Raja-tt4ll
    @Raja-tt4ll 5 лет назад

    Very Nice Explanation Thanks :)

  • @aborucu
    @aborucu 2 года назад

    Shouldn't it be 100%-34,3% = 65,7% of targets will ve accepted ?

  • @amirshareghinajar5140
    @amirshareghinajar5140 8 лет назад +5

    8:29 - 18.3% of non targeted would be accepted

    • @chirathabey7729
      @chirathabey7729 8 лет назад

      It should not be accepted this 81.7% of Non-targets because cumulative count for score range of 400-500 for Non-target is given by (6212/7607)*100 = 81.7% (True Negatives)
      Plus, Amir is right, (100 - 81.7)% = 18.3% will be accepted as False Positives.

    • @alexdamado
      @alexdamado 7 лет назад

      I believe Amir Shareghi Najar is correct. The cumulative distribution tells us that 81.7% of the non-target population scored in the ranges between 0-500. Therefore, if the threshold is above the 500 bracket, 1 - 81.7% = 18.3% should be accepted (The right side of the graph).

    • @prasannakannan3871
      @prasannakannan3871 7 лет назад

      yes amir is correct. 18.3% of non target would be accepted. this can also be viewed as the false positive rate for this threshold value in the ROC curve

    • @DrNoureddinSadawi
      @DrNoureddinSadawi  7 лет назад

      Thank you all for the useful feedback!

    • @DrNoureddinSadawi
      @DrNoureddinSadawi  7 лет назад

      thanks for your FB

  • @theMou
    @theMou 7 лет назад +3

    i don't get how you calculate the cumulative counts. where do they come from?

  • @tejas94
    @tejas94 6 лет назад +1

    how was the scoring done?

  • @GreensShadow
    @GreensShadow 4 года назад

    With a K-S equal to 47.4 is this no better than guessing?

  • @rajatbhosale8188
    @rajatbhosale8188 6 лет назад +1

    Cumulative counts are wrong but the concept taught by you was good. Thanks #Aspiring data scientist