The set-up is strange. Rather than sitting on both sides, why don’t the hosts sit on the same side and guest on the other side.. so that the guest doesn’t have to look in this direction and that direction.
Change the seating arrangement set up. The two hosts could sit on the same side.. rather than on each side of the guest. So the guest has to look only in one general direction.
Jara shot krishna and died, Jara was Vaali from Ramayan, and Ram Promised him, that he will allow Vaali to kill him in the next avatar, as rama killed vaali from behind and it was against the rule of engagement of war.
@@shadowalphawolf9926 ohh not mahabali brother! I meant vaali but we usually say baali instead of v. the monkey king sugreev brother. Both Vaali and baali is correct but im not sure a baali its just how we say it here in kerala.
I don't know why she never tells how it was Shri Krishn who gave all the Divya gyaan to bhishma to give to Yuddhishitir! Even bhishma asks bhagwan krishn that why is he not doing it himself! How can anyone dare to speak when Shri krishn himself is present there! Even vaac devta won't speak in front of him!
Because He(Krsna) wanted to show the glories of His Devotee(Bhishma) and so He intentionally did this, because Krsna always glorifies His devotees and devotees glorify Krsna❤ ❤ Hare Krishna ❤
@@Adi_Anant_Narayan okiesss Haribollll.... Hare Krishna.... I think ami ji only talks from Itihas perspective and from Mahabharat and Ramayan perspective, and so Bhakti(which is Srimad Bhagwatam) she doesn't elaborate In her many of her talks, while talking about the greatness of Queen Kunti and Maa Draupadi, she doesn't mention their greatness from Srimad Bhagwatam( i.e. how great of Vaishnavis they were) and only from Itihaas
@@this_is_me_trying I am talking with itihaas's perspective only! This is mentioned in Mahabharata itself! Whatever I mentioned in my first comment is mentioned in Mahabharata!
She has read abridged version of Mahabharata by Baroda research oriental Institute (BORI). Which is considered most authentic. Please do a simple Google about BORI abridged version for your own convenience.
The death of Lord Krishna or giving up his body by Krishna is a major interpolation in Mahabharata..And this so called expert who jumps and starts saying other things as interpolation doesn't even give a disclaimer that it maybe an interpolation. Also, the grand son of Krishna is Vajra or Vajranabha, but not Vraj or anything..Ami gantara makes lot of such errors and mistakes like these in many of her interviews.
Well, Karna is a nutcase of a character so can't blame her. Especially when Indian males are such a fan of this character that they jump in to defend all of his misdeeds.
@@user-um2ty5vo4t Here are the below authentic editions of the epic - Bibek Debroy translation of Bori critical edition. - English translation by Kisari Mohan Ganguli (KMG). - Neelkanth edition Sanskrit Hindi version of Gita Press. - Mahabharat adaptation by Shri Rajgopalachari based on Dakshinayat. These sources do cite the same. Ved vyas himself described Karn as the trunk of Adharma tree then what more proof do u want??
Do you even know what that means? Karna has been called the trunk of adharma because Duryodhana had enmity with the Pandavas by standing over the same trunk. Here the trunk of adharma is called the power of karna@@Bunns-ty5fm
Love listening to Ami ganatra..!! ❤❤😊😊
If you have problem with karna then your are my best friend. I'm totally against karna being projected as a hero.
Excellent explanation about Mahabharata. 🥰✌️🙏🙏
Ami ji's every podcast is like a masterclass 💪💪🙏🙏🙏🙏
The set-up is strange. Rather than sitting on both sides, why don’t the hosts sit on the same side and guest on the other side.. so that the guest doesn’t have to look in this direction and that direction.
Oddcast Show hai, toh setup bhi sahi hai 🤘😂 I was not aware of shanti parva, good study by the host duo
Right..
Yes u r right
Change the seating arrangement set up. The two hosts could sit on the same side.. rather than on each side of the guest. So the guest has to look only in one general direction.
Very Informative...Thank You.
Pranamam🙏
Nice one
radhe shyam, sita ram
Yudhisthir had bramahstra
👏
Jara shot krishna and died, Jara was Vaali from Ramayan, and Ram Promised him, that he will allow Vaali to kill him in the next avatar, as rama killed vaali from behind and it was against the rule of engagement of war.
Its bali not vali. See this is how dravidian languages are different from north
@@ArjunVB666 isnt Bali the King defeated by Vamana avatara? It is Vaali brother both in North and South
@@shadowalphawolf9926 ohh not mahabali brother! I meant vaali but we usually say baali instead of v. the monkey king sugreev brother. Both Vaali and baali is correct but im not sure a baali its just how we say it here in kerala.
@@ArjunVB666 interesting...I am from TN and I have never seen his name spelled as Baali
@@shadowalphawolf9926 we keralites say baali and Sugreev but maybe it might be a regional difference. In ramayan its baali malayalm edition
These vids are so random the mahabharat is huge so be specific as to the subject
I don't know why she never tells how it was Shri Krishn who gave all the Divya gyaan to bhishma to give to Yuddhishitir! Even bhishma asks bhagwan krishn that why is he not doing it himself! How can anyone dare to speak when Shri krishn himself is present there! Even vaac devta won't speak in front of him!
Because that never happens in Mahabharata.. why wouldn't sree krishna do it himself rather than go through Bhishma .. r u dumb ?
Because He(Krsna) wanted to show the glories of His Devotee(Bhishma) and so He intentionally did this, because Krsna always glorifies His devotees and devotees glorify Krsna❤
❤
Hare Krishna ❤
@@this_is_me_trying i know that! But I am talking about ami ji here!
@@Adi_Anant_Narayan okiesss Haribollll.... Hare Krishna.... I think ami ji only talks from Itihas perspective and from Mahabharat and Ramayan perspective, and so Bhakti(which is Srimad Bhagwatam) she doesn't elaborate
In her many of her talks, while talking about the greatness of Queen Kunti and Maa Draupadi, she doesn't mention their greatness from Srimad Bhagwatam( i.e. how great of Vaishnavis they were) and only from Itihaas
@@this_is_me_trying I am talking with itihaas's perspective only! This is mentioned in Mahabharata itself! Whatever I mentioned in my first comment is mentioned in Mahabharata!
Hindi pls
What about non Hindi people?
Who is she . I think she read English mahabharatha.
She has read abridged version of Mahabharata by Baroda research oriental Institute (BORI). Which is considered most authentic. Please do a simple Google about BORI abridged version for your own convenience.
@@unknownuser6348 then why she telling too much lies
@@sathyaacharya6182 nowhere she is lying. Your lack of knowledge is the issue.
@@unknownuser6348 just go through th history of sukthankar . Then talk to me.
@@unknownuser6348 Is it .? Then u are telling bori foundation critical edition book what I have read is not authentic 🤔
baccha bohot distracted lag raha hai.
Bat yo aap Mahabharat ki kar rahe ho bat app English main kar rahe ho bullshit both of you
Aap Sanskrit mein kar lo apna podcast 😊
The death of Lord Krishna or giving up his body by Krishna is a major interpolation in Mahabharata..And this so called expert who jumps and starts saying other things as interpolation doesn't even give a disclaimer that it maybe an interpolation. Also, the grand son of Krishna is Vajra or Vajranabha, but not Vraj or anything..Ami gantara makes lot of such errors and mistakes like these in many of her interviews.
Why are reaffirming fairy talrs...so many legitimate topics to talk about yet people spend type on these gimmicks
And yet here you are ! When you could be listening to all those podcasts on legitimate topics
She always has a problem with Karna....
Because you are a blind fan of karna he was an adharmi😂
Supporters of adharmi is adharmi. Thats what you are. That's what your ideal man was.
Well, Karna is a nutcase of a character so can't blame her. Especially when Indian males are such a fan of this character that they jump in to defend all of his misdeeds.
@@affinity1996 let it be
@@knowledgeconsumer1289 let it be
she always against Karna ...that's why i don't like her video
U r against dharma 😂😂😂😂
Well she have enough credible evidences or let's say enough authentic sources to back her claims. What have you got???
@@Bunns-ty5fm Then what you got ?
@@user-um2ty5vo4t Here are the below authentic editions of the epic
- Bibek Debroy translation of Bori critical edition.
- English translation by Kisari Mohan Ganguli (KMG).
- Neelkanth edition Sanskrit Hindi version of Gita Press.
- Mahabharat adaptation by Shri Rajgopalachari based on Dakshinayat.
These sources do cite the same. Ved vyas himself described Karn as the trunk of Adharma tree then what more proof do u want??
Do you even know what that means? Karna has been called the trunk of adharma because Duryodhana had enmity with the Pandavas by standing over the same trunk. Here the trunk of adharma is called the power of karna@@Bunns-ty5fm