Episode kaisa lagaa? Accha lagaa toh like button zarur se dabaaye! ♥️ ✨ Ami Ganatra on Ramayan - ruclips.net/video/Y6Q5hpTAzNQ/видео.html ✨ Apna Bhagya Badlo - ruclips.net/video/9lkUh4tZTCo/видео.html Want to get featured on the podcast? Write to us on jayesh@awaaramusaafir.com
श्लोक 4.14 copy न मां कर्माणि लिम्पन्ति न मे कर्मफले स्पृहा । इति मां योऽभिजानाति कर्मभिर्न स बध्यते ॥ १४ ॥ शब्दार्थ न-कभी नहीं; माम्-मुझको; कर्माणि-सभी प्रकार के कर्म; लिम्पन्ति-प्रभावित करते हैं; न-नहीं; मे-मेरी; कर्म-फले-सकाम कर्म में; स्पृहा-महत्त्वाकांक्षा; इति-इस प्रकार; माम्-मुझको; य:-जो; अभिजानाति-जानता है; कर्मभि:-ऐसे कर्म के फल से; न-कभी नहीं; स:-वह; बध्यते-बँध पाता है ।. अनुवाद play_arrowpause मुझ पर किसी कर्म का प्रभाव नहीं पड़ता, न ही मैं कर्मफल की कामना करता हूँ। जो मेरे सम्बन्ध में इस सत्य को जानता है, वह भी कर्मों के फल के पाश में नहीं बँधता।
@@niyug-tp8rh श्लोक 7.15 copy न मां दुष्कृतिनो मूढा: प्रपद्यन्ते नराधमा: । माययापहृतज्ञाना आसुरं भावमाश्रिता: ॥ १५ ॥ शब्दार्थ न-नहीं; माम्-मेरी; दुष्कृतिन:-दुष्ट; मूढा:-मूर्ख; प्रपद्यन्ते-शरण ग्रहण करते हैं; नर-अधमा:-मनुष्यों में अधम; मायया-माया के द्वारा; अपहृत-चुराये गये; ज्ञाना:-ज्ञान वाले; आसुरम्-आसुरी; भावम्-प्रकृति या स्वभाव को; आश्रिता:-स्वीकार किये हुए ।. अनुवाद play_arrowpause जो निपट मूर्ख हैं, जो मनुष्यों में अधम हैं, जिनका ज्ञान माया द्वारा हर लिया गया है तथा जो असुरों की नास्तिक प्रकृति को धारण करने वाले हैं, ऐसे दुष्ट मेरी शरण ग्रहण नहीं करते।
@@subhadeepmandal2221I have read Mahabharata before I watched it in TV. Karna was the only donor in Mahabharata. Everybody else was either beggar or usurper in Mahabharata. War is not everything. The War spaned mere 18 days. That's why Karna is great. Sri Krishna did the last rites of Karna on his own hand. He didn't do it for Bheeshma or Yudhishthir or Arjuna.
युधिष्ठिर और अर्जुन कृष्ण जी के बाद मारे है न की कर्ण की जैसे । और रही बात कर्ण की तो जब वो मारा गया था तब पांडव और दूर्यधान के बीच मैं लड़ाई हो रहा था इसीलिए उन्होंने ऐसा किया और भीष्म जी के वक्त तो ऐसा कोई दुविधा नहीं आई थी @@coolfreaks68
The Mystery of Mahabharata is that almost all Main Characters have their own Right and Wrong Both, The Moral of the Mahabharat Katha is to Keep Dharma High above All under any circumstances.
@@sajisebastian8412 In simple words, in the pursuit of their personal duties, everyone forgets that they also live in a society. Due to their mutual enmity and ignorance, this problem spreads from home to society.
@@KaminiSaini-p9i didi jo bta rha h vo expert hai usne apni zindagi k Kai saal Lgaye hai smjhi 😂 Isly no dialogue Or vese v serial me to Karn aaj v great hai q tnsn Le rhi ho
He was defeated Fair and Square. Chronology of events :- In battle karna is badly injured and bathed in blood even before his chariot wheel sunk. The wheel of karnas chariot sink in earth. By this time Arjuna had invoked Raudrastra against him but takes back after his chariot wheel sinks. Karna invokes Dharma and asks Arjuna and Krishna to stop. Krishna shows him Mirror by reminding him all his Adharmas right from Poisoning of bhima , abusing and mistreatment of draupadi to deceitful killing of Abhimanyu and rejects his arguments. Karna hangs down Head in Shame and understands that his trick is failed. Krishna asks Arjuna to continue battle. Karna Arjuna battle begins again. Karna invokes Brahmastra from ground with great difficulty and Arjuna counters it with his own Brahmastra. Arjuna fires Agneya Weapon and Karna counters with Varuna astra and covers sky with cloud. Arjuna nullifies Varuna Weapon with Vayavya Weapon. Then Arjuna took out Anjalika arrow and fixed on bow and uttered the speech that if he has practiced ascetic austerities , gratified elders and superiors , and listening to the council of well wishers then let this arrow slay his enemy karna. Arjuna Shoots the Anjalika arrow and it cuts off the Head of Karna. He was killed Fair and Square. He had weapons which he used and countered Arjunas weapons also from ground.. Note :- My Answer is Based on Authentic Versions of Mahabharat BORI CE and KMG.
Some script writer somewhere twisted the Mahabharata to say that draupadi laughed at duryodhana. 2 generations actually believed this to be true. Only because we have social media now and ami and this sir are telling that draupadi never laughed, we know it was never there in the original Mahabharata. In this way, fictionalising books and giving them creative freedom will propagate false narratives and make people laugh at their own religion or go away from it without even knowing the truth. It's a very dangerous thing to do. If these many versions exist, know one will know the true version after a certain point of time.
1. bhai, saree traditional culture hain, phele aurate ekavastra phenti thi 2. if y consider virat war, tb arjun ne khha tha ki unse ghandiv 65 saal pheli milli hain, uss hisab se abhimanyu 65+ years hona chaiye, but dikhaya jata hain 16 3. droupadi ke sirph 1 patti tha [yudhisthir] but stories ne usse paach patti bnna diya😭 , aur thi to mata kunti ne bhi dropadi ko whhi khha tha jo karn ne khha tha 4. krishn ne karn ko vrish khha tha, vrish mtlb dharmatma 5. karn ko nhhi ptta tha ti ashwasen uske dhanush mein baitha hain, uska apna arjun se pratishod tha 6. arjun subhadra ka koi love angle ye sb nhhi tha, usne jbardasti usse uthaya tha, tb krishn ne bhi arjun ko bola tha ki ye glt hain
I have some doubts 1.What If lord Krishna didn't save Arjuna while karna used nagastra 2.What if karna used Vijaya dhanush which was used by lord shiva, from starting only. Because he used that bow only for last 3 days 3.Why Arjuna didn't kill when karna had Dhanush in his hand ? 4. why Arjuna killed when karna has no weapon in his hand 5. What if Arjuna and karna fights without any odds ? It's not about movie or serial, I'm just curious
He got vijaya dhanush cuz of curse that parshuram gave him . He got dhanurvidhya by faking out his caste .parshuramji got angry and cursed him but after that he realised that he was curious and so excited to learn brahmastra so he gave him a rath or a chariotee which was the strogest in the mahabharat . After that he also gave him vijaya dhanush Sorry meri english thodi bad h but yeah vijaya dhanush koi mamuli dhanush nai h the person who holds it will be invicible in battle aur may be parshuramji ne bola ho ise 1 hi baar use kr skte ho?😊
@@surajbhalerao5259 simple he was weak but unkillable. A mosquito may be tiny and fragile but its persistence and ability to evade make it more troublesome than its strength. Its weakness is overshadowed by how hard it is to get rid of.
Part 1:- Was Vijaya bow of Karna Mahadeva's bow ? No. It was not. Vijaya bow was bow of Indra. From Indra it went to Parashurama and then to him as per Karna himsrlf. No where Vijaya bow is mentioned as bow of Mahadeva. Even Rukmi is descibred having Vijaya bow. So we don't know for sure who really had original Vijaya bow or karna was just bluffing. My bow, Vijaya, is supreme among all weapons. Vishvakarma constructed it for Indra’s sake. It was with this that Shatakratu vanquished large numbers of daityas. In the ten directions, the daityas were confounded because of its roar. Shakra gave that revered weapon to Bhargava and Bhargava gave that divine and supreme bow to me.With this, I will fight against the mighty-armed Arjuna, foremost among victorious ones, like Indra fighting in a battle against all the assembled daityas. BORI CE translation by Bibek Debroy Karna Parva Chapter 1172(22) Part 2:- Was Vijaya bow used for Destruction of Tripura? No again. The bow used by Mahadeva to destroy Tripura was constructed by Vishwakarma from Mountain and it was the same bow which Shri Ram broke in Mithila. So it is not true. Parashurama himself said in mithila that shri Ram broke the bow used by Shiva to scorch Tripura. Oh, best one among men, out of the two longbows gods gave one to restive Trymbaka, God Shiva for a combat with demon Tripura, and oh, Kakutstha, that bow alone is the annihilator of Tripura, the demon... and you have broken that alone. Part 3:- Is true that if Vijaya bow is Shiva's bow then the holder of Vijaya's bow can never be defeated ? Again no and false. From first two parts it is already answered that Vijaya bow is not the bow of Mahadeva. And whether bow is Vijaya or some other bow it never guarantees victory to anyone. It is warrior who fights battles not bow. Victory and defeat depends on warriors. Karna himself was defeated on 17th day by Bhima with Vijaya bow in hand. Even Karna himself or Parashurama or Indra never made this absurd claim. The son of the wind god powerfully stretched the bow back, all the way up to his ears. Wishing to kill Karna, the great archer angrily released the arrow. Having been thus released by the powerful one, the arrow, with a sound like that of the vajra or thunder, struck Karna in that battle, with a force like that of the vajra against a mountain. O extender of the Kuru lineage! Thus struck by Bhimasena, the son of the suta, the leader of an army, lost his senses and sank down on the floor of his chariot. On seeing that the son of the suta had lost his senses, the lord of Madra bore Karna, the adornment of a battle, away on the chariot. When Karna was defeated, the large army of the sons of Dhritarashtra was driven away by Bhimasena, like an army of the danavas by Indra.” ’ BORI CE translation by Bibek Debroy Karna Parva Chapter 1184(34). So neither Vijaya bow was bow of Mahadeva , nor it was used in battle and destruction of Tripura and nor it gives any victory to wielder.
Karna was a real villain, due to his jealousy & pride the mahabharat war resulted & 50 lakh warriors died . Duryodhana fought the war depending on Karna mainly. Karna instigated Duryodhana to pullout clothes from devi Droupadi s body. Karna was a main villain to kill Abhimanyu along with sapta rathi.
The problem is people want to see things in black and white. The world doesn't work like that. These so called experts clearly know that karn is that grey character in mahabharatha whom people have interpreted and perceived differently. He is the most humane character in mahabharatha unlike all the unreal characters. He is a good man who had committed some unforgivable deeds and sins out of hate, jealousy, anger and pride. That's us. That's a human. Imperfect and forever improving. The guy before the war knew that he was in the wrong and his ultimate fate is fatality handed to him by his arch rival. He accepts all these infront of vasudev. There is a long ass intimate conversation between karn and vasdev before the war where he is vulnerable. He reveals himself there and you can clearly see the good in him. Even vasudev calls him "narashrestha"-the best among men and offers him the throne saying that he is equally capable to yudhistir if not more and deserves it as a seniormost kountaya. The guy outright rejects it. These people won't mention these interactions. They just want bash a beloved character, create controvesry and benefit from it.
Multiverse के अनुसार काकभूषांडी ने ११ बार रामायण ऑर १६ बार महाभारत देखे हे diffrent universe and different time line में तो तुम क्या ही कर्ण ऑर रावण की बात करते हो
Virat yudhh ke bare me aap galat bata rahe ho. bhishm pitama ne pratigya li thi ki wo stree , kinnar upar shastra nahi uthaega isi karan unhone sikhandani ke samne apna shastra tyag diya tha ...lekin aapne virat yudhh me pitmah bhishm ko bhi lada ke hara diaya
KARNA WAS A GOOD MAN, IN ORIGINAL MAHABHARATHA - This o.o is the whole point of his character arc, how a good man, supports Adharma & meets his end. Karna does not knowinglt shoot snake arrow. The snake sat on the arrow without Karna knowing, as the snake had a vendata against Arjun. When it missed, first time, it went back to Karna to ask his permission this time, but Karna said no. He wants to win by himself.
@@tusharranjan1054 - what bs o.o u type, we believe lol zoomr. There is an entire verse about the snake. o.o foos tryin so hard to rewrite Mahabharatha, which has multi levels but these mistakes we call zoomrs tryin so hard to pretend they understand mahabharatha lol
I have heard so many podcasts and sab ka yahi question aaj ka generation yeh padhega nahi isko modify karna hai kya...simple answer to this is both are epics are relevant irrespective of time. Original text is so powerful ki usko "aaj ki generation " ke liye modify karne ki zaroorat nahi hai balki aaj ki generation ko Original text padhna chahiye
About the question where was the Krishna. You need to look at it in different way. “Play your own game people, yes I’m there but I will not play everybody’s game. Yes I’m born as a human as a awatar doesn’t mean you’ll not do anything.” So anybody looking for different answer this is what I found out and one famous sentence said by Krishna “hesitation is worst than any crime”.
@@ritullathiya5192 in that book karna lost twice to Satyaki and Bheem lost to Abhimanyu in 1 on 1 battle on the day he was killed lost to Arjun during Swayamwar ViratYudh and many more occasions but they never showed it on Television they all are just portraying negative character as a hero
Indrajeet ko maat include kroo Karna ko kr rahe hoo whoo bhi galat hai but Indrajeet sach mai bhaut sahi thaa usne sirf apne Pita ki baat manii hai Indrajeet Mahan hai ❤❤
*@anujamarathe8339* Karna was indeed a villain, not a hero, because he willingly supported Adharma. He was not the only human being; even Arjuna was also a human, but he was much better than Karna. Arjuna had both good and bad characteristics in him, but he always chose the good over the bad, unlike Karna.
@@jaydutta7711 in Mahabharat the 1st villian is Dhrutarashtra who always supported his adharmi son Duryodhan and his wicked ideas and plans to end Pandavas. He also planned to kill Bhim by hugging him.
Dhuryodhan doesn't know dice gambling and seeks support of Saguni whereas Yuthistra also not familiar with that gambling, was not interested to seek support of Krishna! Until unless you seek and pray for assistance, even God will not come for suport!
Daanveer Raja Harishchandra ✅ Karn was not a Daanveer. Infact he "exchanged" his Kawach to get Shakti Parv astra from Indradev It was not a DAAN but a trade !!
If Ambani is giving jio free is he danveer? Waise hi adani godrej Ambani daan karenge aur dusre taraf galat karenge apne bete ko Aston Martin hit and run case mai jhok denge tou wo badhiya nahi hai😅
In Virat Yuddh, Arjuna (while being a half-man as Brihannala, due to Urvashi's curse) single handedly defeated entire kuru warriors (along with their army) all alone. It's because Karna had Kavach kundal for his protection from death since birth. And Bhishma had a boon that he cannot die without his own wish. And Dronacharya being a guru of Arjun, he won't kill him. And Ashwatthama had a stone on his forehead, thus made him kinda immortal. And Kripacharya also 'Chiranjeevi'. And also Duryodhan's Kavach given by Dronacharya which were as effective as Karna's Kavach, so Duryodhan won't die either. Only Arjuna was without any boon or protection- PURE TALENT.
@@Ganguli1999 Shri Hari Vishnu, divided himself in two parts, i.e. Nara and Narayana. Narayana is directly Shri Hari Vishnu, who again incarnated as Rama, Krishna, and so on. Arjun was the incarnation of Nara, hence in a way he was part of Prabhu Hari Vishnu. (For reference, read the story of Badrinath Dhaam) So, you are piling up your own sins by saying such things about Arjuna.. Arjuna Shri Krishna bhagwan kaa hi NAR roop hai, Arjuna Shri Krishna kaa Mitra nahi balki unki ki praan urjaa hai jo Dwapar Yugaa me Alag alag Avatar ke roop mein prakat hue thee, jo Arjuna ko gaali deta hai wo indirectly Shri Krishna ko hi gaali de Raha hai, jaha par Arjuna ki burai hoti hai waha par Shri Krishna bhagwan KABHI NAHI aate. Magar in gadho ko kaun samjhaye.
But karna didn't used Vijaya dhanasu every time as Arjuna used gandivi danssu everytime, instead karna used his vijya bow on 17th day of kurukshetra war.
@@manjunathmeti7576 karna cannot even handle Gandiva Dhanush, it was extremely powerful, can only be handled by very powerful warrior like Arjuna. But Arjuna didn't use Gandiva in Draupadi's swayamvar where he defeated karna and other kings using simple arrows used for hitting the target 🎯
@@manjunathmeti7576main point to yahi hai Karna ko sb villain adharmi ye sb kehte hai to koi dikkat nhi hai but Jb uski kabiliyat ke bare me bolte hai ki nhi wo to har kisi se haar jata Arjun ke saamne kuch nhi tha Tb wo sare point chupa lete hai jaise Jb guru dronacharya ji ne Arjun ko wada kiya tha ki Arjun sarvshrest dhanurdhari banenge to jb ekluvya ki kushalta dekh kr dono shishya aur guru aashcharya chakit ho gye ki ye isne kaise seekha jo ki Bina guru dronacharya ki shishya ke bs unki pratima bana ke saamne self training krta tha tb unhone uska anghutha manga Arjun ko sarvshrest dhanurdhari banane ke liye Karna ne jb bhramastra ki Vidya seekhna caha to mana kr diya guru dronacharya ji ne bola ki abhi tum uske liye saksham nhi ho Pr parshuram ji ne karna ko Vidya diya jb jb karna ko mauka milta tha apni kabiliyat ko proof krne ka waha Arjun pehle hi upasthit rhte the Isliye wo Arjun ko apna shatru maan te rhe Draupadi ke swayamvar me karna ko mauka nhi diya gya apni kabiliyat proof krne ka aur waha pe draupadi ne bohot kuch bola tha karn ke bare me baad me Arjun swayamvar me Jeet gye uske baad se karna ke man me badle ka bhav utpan hua Theek hai karna villain hi the manshikta se unne duryodhana ki har ek cheez me saath diya Sb Arjun ko sarvshrest dhanurdhari bulate rehte the Kai baar Arjun aur karna ka aamna saamna hua par Arjun bhari isiliye pade kyuki unke pass gandhiva tha har baar ye baat chupa liya jata hai Lekin jab karna ki shiksha parshuram ji dwara hui to unhone karna ko kai Divya astro ki shiksha aur bhramastra ki shiksha aur ek dhanush bhi diya tha jo ki Vijay dhanush tha jo ki shiv ji ka dhanush hai ye dhanush jiske haath me hoga usko protect bhi karta tha aur iski accuracy force speed normal human made dhanush se jyada thi jaisa ki gandhiva ki bhi thi Is baar jab karna arjun ke against hote hai to swayam Arjun ke pitaji jo ki indra dev hai wo unse unka kawach kundal maang lete hai Aur mata kunti bhi swayam aa kr karna ko batati hai sari baat ki wo unhi ke purta hai wo Pandavo ke side ho le Par ab tak bohot der ho chuki thi karna ke andar badle ki bhavna aur apna samarth dikhane ki iksha use kurukshetra ki ladai me le gyi Is baar karna Jo ki pehle kabhi Arjun ke saman nhi the Wo ab Arjun par bhari pad rhe the kyuki ab unke paas bhi Divya Vijay dhanush tha Aur unko hara pana Arjun ke liye muskil ho ra tha Fir to pata hi hoga karna ko mara kaise gya hai Karna ko ekdum tuch bta Dene ke liye refrences bhagwat geeta se late hai Jb bhagwat geeta Arjun aur sri krishna ke madhya hue conversation hai to usme se karna ke bare me kaha se pata chalega Ved vyasa ji ne bs Mahabharata likhi hai jab sab ho chuka tha yudh ke baad bache the pandav aur Shri Krishna to unhone unke baare me likha aur jitna unko pata chala utna hi likha Aur ved vyasa ji pandava aur Kauravas ke dada ji the Karna ke bare me unhone kuch nhi likha iska matlab ye thodi hai ki karna ke bare me bakiyo ne jo likha wo galat hai Agar yudh hua do paksho ki taraf to do POV honge na ya bs ek POV se dekhkar kisi ko kayar bol do Paida hote hi koi mahan dhanurdhari nhi tha unko sikhaya gya aur Vidya diya gya gandhivadhari Arjun shresth the lekin parshuram ji ki shiksha aur unse yudh niti seekh kar aur vijay dhanush prapt kr karna sarvshrest dhanurdhari Bane Jo ki wo proof nhi kar paye kyuki wo dharma ke virudh khade the aur unka yahi ant tha lekin wo Arjun ki dhanurdhari ki wajah se nhi hare wo duryodhana ke paap ke bhagidhari the isliye hare Unke kiye punya ki wajah se to unko mrityu bhi nhi prapt ho rhi thi
Who had a better life, Arjun or Pandavas vs Karna or Kauravas? In all 107 cousin brothers viz. 5 Pandavas, 💯 Kauravas, Karna and Yuyutsu; Duryodhana had best luxurious life, followed by rest 99 brothers and Yuyutsu. In all 6 sons of Devi Kunti, Karna lived best luxurious lifestyle, whole life in grand city 🌆 Hastinapur 🏙️ in home 🏠 of rich and reputed father AdhiRath. In all 5 Pandavas, Arjun 🏹 led most hard life, lived 12+ years more in forest, done more penance and fought more wars. Karna's father AdhiRath was friend of King Dhritarashtra and Karna was friend of Duryodhana since his childhood. As Karna was 10+ years older than Duryodhana, so he used to visit regularly Duryodhana and impressed him a lot since childhood. Devi Kunti and his 5 sons, later returned to HastinaPur. This arrival was not welcomed by Duryodhana and Karna. Karna's Lifestyle: He was born with celestial kavach and kundalas. As long as those things were there no body can kill him. So he was always protected since childhood. Not lived with real parents but always found parenthood. He had the best education from Krupa and Drona and Parasurama. As Karna fans usually tells that he was alone - He had brothers, many wives and children, so he was not alone. He was the best friend of Prince Dhuryodhana. He used to sleep with many women. He lived a luxury lifestyle as a KING. He never went to the forest nor did nobody conspired to kill him. He never did any penance to any God except Lord Surya (of whom he did pooja - Not Tapasya), who was his father. He never went begging. He made digvijay yatra. He died in a big battle. Though he was marked as Suta he became a KING. Very fortunate fellow. Whereas Pandavas who were the rightful owners of a big empire became beggars. They had to fight at every stage of their lives, they were raised and lived most of their life in forests or exile.
Arjun's tough life-- he did fight many wars but also observed his oath very faithfully :P Said to Draupadi that he will remain celibate and then got convinced by Ulupi that celibacy was only meant not copulating with Draupadi.. then enjoyed time in swag log and then again in Manipur. Arjun got weapons and good guidance. Karna tried to break mould, pretended to be brahmin and got curses. Arjun had no such issue, he also pretended to be brahmin at different points, at Draupadi swaymvar, at Jarasandh killing but no issues, no curses,. No doubt Pandav had though life but more than all the affluence of the world, they weren't deprived of love from their mother. Such a shame that "Karna used to sleep with many women" when Yudhisatr himself donated 1000 women during dice game before Draupadi :P . Duryodhan didn't do so many marriages and Yudhistar own intention for dice game was to usurp Duryodhan's kingdom. So he was no saint. But the thing which I didn't like about Karna was his cribbing. I rarely saw Pandavs for cribbing, occasional anguish at Yudhistar but then they still followed his command.
ok arjun lied being brahmin but did he aquire any knowledge by lieing as being brahmin as karna did did he hurt anyone as karna hurt parashurama by telling lie nd wat yudhishthir donated 1000 women where is it written show me the proof
@@kundankanan9074 Arjuna NEVER tried to pretend Brahmin, they became Brahmins for some time, because they were living in jungles, and they were hiding their identity from Duryodhana to find out his evil plans. To whom did Arjuna lied to??? No one, it's Karna and Duryodhana who were unable to identify Arjuna and other Pandavas in Swayamvar. And Dyut krida was already a set-up to steal Indraprastha from Pandavas, Yudhishthir was forced to play, as ordered by Dhritarashtra himself. And your info is incomplete, Yudhishthir donated both men and women, they were like staff members of Indraprastha kingdom, alongwith Indraprastha, Nothing wrong with that.
@@kundankanan9074 Arjuna NEVER tried to pretend Brahmin, they became Brahmins for some time, because they were living in jungles, and they were hiding their identity from Duryodhana to find out his evil plans. To whom did Arjuna lied to??? No one, it's Karna and Duryodhana who were unable to identify Arjuna and other Pandavas in Swayamvar. And Dyut krida was already a setup to steal Indraprastha from Pandavas, Yudhishthir was forced to play, as ordered by Dhritarashtra himself. And your info is incomplete, Yudhishthir donated both men and women, they were like staff members of Indraprastha kingdom, alongwith Indraprastha, Nothing wrong with that.
1. bhai, saree traditional culture hain, phele aurate ekavastra phenti thi 2. if y consider virat war, tb arjun ne khha tha ki unse ghandiv 65 saal pheli milli hain, uss hisab se abhimanyu 65+ years hona chaiye, but dikhaya jata hain 16 3. droupadi ke sirph 1 patti tha [yudhisthir] but stories ne usse paach patti bnna diya😭 , aur thi to mata kunti ne bhi dropadi ko whhi khha tha jo karn ne khha tha 4. krishn ne karn ko vrish khha tha, vrish mtlb dharmatma 5. karn ko nhhi ptta tha ti ashwasen uske dhanush mein baitha hain, uska apna arjun se pratishod tha 6. arjun subhadra ka koi love angle ye sb nhhi tha, usne jbardasti usse uthaya tha, tb krishn ne bhi arjun ko bola tha ki ye glt hain
@@darkclouds6246 iss chaman agarwal bol raha iske paas vedvyaas mahabharat hai🤣🤣 iss chaman agarwal ko ye nahi pata hai ki aaj ki mahabharat uske shishya ke hai😂😂
People without brain :- अर्जुन महान था, बिना पढ़े बताते हैं क्योंकि उनके साथ श्री कृष्ण थे, श्री कृष्ण द्रौपदी के लिए पांडवो के पक्ष में थे 😅😅 क्या कर्ण ने ये जानते हुए भी कि कवच और कुंडल दान में देने से वो युद्ध में मारा जा सकता है अपना कवच और कुंडल दान में नहीं दिया था इंद्र को ???? क्या श्री कृष्ण ने काई बार कर्ण के हाथो अर्जुन के प्राण नहीं बचाये????? क्या भार्गव अस्त्र से युधिष्ठिर, भीम, नकुल, शदेव और यहां तक कि अर्जुन भी भाग कर अपने शिवर में नहीं गए थे 😅😂😂😂 क्या कर्ण ने अपनी माता कुंती को वचन नहीं दिया था कि वो युधिष्ठिर, भीम, नकुल, शहदेव के प्राण नहीं लेगा , क्या अंतिम युद्ध से ठीक पहले मानसिक रूप से कामजोड़ करने के लिए श्रीकृष्ण ने नहीं बताया था कि पांडव तुम्हारे अपने भाई हैं?😂😂😂😂😂😂
Ravan v karn se pehele Mahan gyani dhanurdhari tha bijaya pakdne wala kabhi achha ni ho sakta jisne uss nari ko beshya kaha unki maa v kuch devta se bacha prapta ki thi jisi maa behen bacha pede karenge usse kabhi dharmvan nehi kehsakte
Finally writters like this are coming out. Sir and Ami gantra mam.. who are well read and researched, are bursting the myths that has been created by TV.
im askin wht r the changes she made..like to my knowledge her book served as a summary of most authentic 3 mahabharatas availably right now and its written with user friendly terminologies and explanations..was there any factual mistakes or modifications?can u pls say@@MTechInformationTechnology
@@HarinandS-t9c Their books came in later period like 1970 , Mahabharata texts existed in 1868 as Le Mahabharata, Raznama in 14th Century. Why I have to believe a agenda based organization which alters the text ?
SONY-PUTRA KARNA TV SHOW ek FAKE Show hai jo sirf Karna FANS ke liye hi banaya gayaa hai, magar ismein bhi karna apne raath kaa pahiyaa uthaane mei asamarth hai, ye hai uski taakat. 😂😂😂😂😂
@@himanshudutta609 karn viraatyudh aur Gandharva me pata hi kya raftaar se bhaga tha ,, aur Mahabharat me bhi Hara tha abhimanyu, satyaki, Bheem(in Archery 🤡) and Arjun se to everytime , proof chahiye hoga to respected hoke maang Lena Mera se🤗
Mahabharata is that one epic which shows every character falling ultimately prey to their own flaws. Each and every character is responsible for his or her doom
Karna FANS - Karna's Kawach kundal was taken by Lord Indra Deceitfully: No, it was a pure transaction between Karna and Lord Indra. If Lord Indra was so fond of Karna's donations, Why did Lord Indra make a condition that the 'vaisavi shakti' astra can only be used by just one time, and not many times? Because Karna demanded that astra as a substitute for kawach kundal, for which Indra denied first, but after insisting by Karna, Indra put forth his conditions of using that astra only one time. A. If Lord Indra was so insecured about his son Arjuna, why did Lord Indra gave his 'vaisavi shakti' astra to Karna? If Indra already knew that Karna would use that 'vaisavi shakti' to kill Arjuna, then Indra would be the most STUPIDEST father in the entire Dwapar Yuga, who in spite of saving his son, giving the power to his son's enemy. Obviously it was NOT any 'aashirvaad' by Indra. Karna Fans & TV shows: •Indra ask Karna to give his kawach kundal as a donation. •Karna gave those kawach kundal to Indra. •Indra impressed and by his own wish gave Karna - vaisavi shakti. "How stupid Indra was - to give a deadly weapon so that Karna would kill his son Arjuna." - Sarcastically speaking Here's how it happened: •Indra ask Karna to give his kawach kundal as a donation. •Karna rejected first, and then ask for a favor in return - vaisavi shakti. •Indra rejected that offer first - he knew Karna would use that weapon against Arjuna. •Karna also refused to donate his kawach kundal to Indra. •Indra then make a deal to use that vaisavi shakti astra only one time, after that it will return to Indra. •Karna agreed to that deal and gave his kawach kundal to Indra. B. If Lord Indra was so insecured about his son Arjuna, why didn't Lord Indra gave those kawach kundal to Arjuna afterwards? - it's because Indra wasn't worried about his son Arjuna, he just wanted to remove those protection from Karna, so that Karna would die. "Indra dev ko iss baat ki chinta nahin thi ki Arjuna ko kaise bachayenge, balki iss baat ki chinta thi ki karna ko kaise maarenge, Indra dev ko Arjuna ki shakti aur saamarthya pe pura bharosa hai" C. If Lord Indra was so insecured about his son Arjuna, Didn't Lord Indra gave any counter weapon of vaisavi shakti to Arjuna? Yes he did. Indra gave Arjuna his most powerful weapons - Vajra and Aindrastra. Vaisavi shakti could kill only one person but Vajra could kill thousands of demons at a time. ----------------------------------------------- Even with the 'Vaishvi shakti' weapon of Karna, he couldn't able to kill Arjuna as Arjuna had the knowledge of Lord Shiva's weapons which could easily nullify the effects of 'Vaishvi shakti' weapon.(It is stupid to think that Indra's weapons are stronger than Lord Shiva's weapons) •Raudrastra : This weapon was used by Arjuna to kill fourteen thousand kalakeya demons. •Pashupatastra : Lord Shiva granted this weapon to Arjuna after testing his valour. This is the most powerful weapon of Shiva. Invoking Pashupatastra is highly against the warfare as it is capable of destroying the universe. Arjuna never used it. •Maheshwarastra : It is said to contain the power of Lord Shiva's third eye and it's capable of killing immortal gods. Arjuna also had the knowledge of Pashupatastra of lower version which he received from Indra. ---------------------------------------------------------- If Arjuna has to CHEAT, to kill Karna, he would have done it much earlier and with ease. As Arjuna had ‘Sammohan Astra', - which makes the enemy to either sit on the chariots, leaving all his weapons keep aside, or hallucinated or fainted. After that Arjuna can kill the enemy easily. He could use that weapon in Mahabharata war, to kill all his opponents easily, but he didn't, as it's an unfair means to fight a war. In Virat yuddh, he used this weapon merely to stop fight. He didn't kill any big warrior afterward - like Bheeshma, Drona, Kripa, Karan, Ashwatthama, Duryodhan etc. He could have killed Karna there and then. And if you say that Karna had kawach kundal, he won't die, then Arjuna could have forcefully taken his kawach kundal from his body, as Karna was hallucinated or fainted. But instead, Arjuna spared all those lives, including the life of Duryodhan and Dusshasana, which showed Arjuna always stood by the side of Dharma and Truth. --------------------------------------- I wonder how anybody got a boon as kawach kundal since birth. It's obvious that those kawach kundal belong to the Indra loka. So how did Karna got it since birth? Because everyone else in all the 4 yugas, who got some kind of boon either by doing some hard penance to the Gods, or some good deeds. So How did Karna got Kawach kundal since birth? It means he was extremely lucky to get it free of cost, OR he did a penance to the Lord Surya on his previous life when he was a deamon named Sahasrakavacha, who got 1000 Kawach kundal, out of which 999 were destroyed by Nara and Narayan (Arjuna and Krishna).
And this time when Surya Dev come and said to karna Indra dev is coming to take your kavach kundal . So don't give you and that movement karna if kavach kundal is not still I defeat Arjun because my I learn from Guru Dron and parashuram.. and still people said Dronacharya never tech karna
1. bhai, saree traditional culture hain, phele aurate ekavastra phenti thi 2. if y consider virat war, tb arjun ne khha tha ki unse ghandiv 65 saal pheli milli hain, uss hisab se abhimanyu 65+ years hona chaiye, but dikhaya jata hain 16 3. droupadi ke sirph 1 patti tha [yudhisthir] but stories ne usse paach patti bnna diya😭 , aur thi to mata kunti ne bhi dropadi ko whhi khha tha jo karn ne khha tha 4. krishn ne karn ko vrish khha tha, vrish mtlb dharmatma 5. karn ko nhhi ptta tha ti ashwasen uske dhanush mein baitha hain, uska apna arjun se pratishod tha 6. arjun subhadra ka koi love angle ye sb nhhi tha, usne jbardasti usse uthaya tha, tb krishn ne bhi arjun ko bola tha ki ye glt hain
Karn was engulfed in jealousy. He was an opportunist. His only intention of being with Duryodhan was to stand against Arjun (indeed the greatest archer), defeat him and earn the title of being the best archer of all times. He was infected with an inferiority complex and always thought of overcoming it by defeating someone greater in prowess. He was not a warrior, he was definitely not brave.
@@tusharranjan1054 o.o stop tryin to fib, no one except zoomers believe you can change reality because you believe. Boi, Krishna had to teach something & Bhisma, Drona & Karna were arche types to show how good people support Adharma. Something which you foos o.o forgot lol
@@KrishnaXArjun haha very funny kiske pass kavach kundal ho vijay dhanush ho physically itni strength ho ki jarasandh ko ek din me hrade vo bhagega drr ke😂😂😂😂😂
MISLEADING VIEWS - If Karna was evil then why would he donate his kavach and kundal? If Karna was evil then why would he reject the offer of Krsna of being crowned the King of World? If Karna was evil then why would he battle on the loosing side despite knowing the consequence? If Karna was evil then why would he let go other pandavas and let them despite having the chance to kill them?
@@vsmart9 your questions doesn't make any sense, If you want ans then go and listen to podcast or read vee vyas mahabharat And still you don't get your ans then you are truly an brainless person who just want controversies
@@divyapatil2420 I have read everything multiple times from authentic sources much better than this Ami Gantra. And therefore you need to give objective and logical answers don't do hasty generalisations because that only shows your lack of understanding and your bias. Daanveer Karna commited sins but that does not mean he is evil. He realised and repeneted for his sins and subsequently paid the price for it.
@vsmart9 And after reading it multiple times you still have doubts?? It's impossible to read mahabharat multiple times It's not episode that you watch multiple times !! 🤣🤣 And if you don't get it then it's not for you!! Bhagwan ne bhi bhagwat gita Arjun ko batayi thi , brainless and darpok karn ko nahi !! So it's not for everyone to be true !! So move on !! Or go cry about your questions !! Aur bura lag raha ho toh thodi der sonyputra dekha lo !! Wahi se gyan liya hai na !!!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Karn nhi Jeet saka aur bhag gye, us waqt ye mahashay wahi the Karn apna chappal chhod ke bhaga tha ye mahashay chappal leke Karn ke piche piche bhaga 😂😂
@@thethreespikes9737 kisi ne nhi suna bs tu hi suna h aur sirf sun ke hi suna rha to no words for you just r.i.p. aur padha v h to book ka naam writer ka naam page no bta de
If Arjuna has to cheat, to kill Karna, he would have done it earlier and with ease. As Arjuna had ‘Sammohan Astra', - which makes the enemy to either sit on the chariots, leaving all his weapons keep aside, or hallucinated or fainted. After that Arjuna can kill the enemy easily. He could use that weapon in Mahabharata war, to kill all his opponents easily, but he didn't, as it's an unfair means to fight a war. In Virat yuddh, he used this weapon merely to stop fight. He didn't kill any big warrior afterward - like Bheeshma, Drona, Kripa, Karan, Ashwatthama, Duryodhan etc. He could have killed Karna there and then. And if you say that Karna had kawach kundal, he won't die, then Arjuna could have forcefully taken his kawach kundal from his body, as Karna was hallucinated or fainted. But instead, Arjuna spared all those lives, including the life of Duryodhan and Dusshasana, which showed Arjuna always stood by the side of Dharma and Truth. I wonder how anybody got a boon as kawach kundal since birth. It's obvious that those kawach kundal belong to the Indra loka. So how did Karna got it since birth? Because everyone else in all the 4 yugas, who got some kind of boon either by doing some hard penance to the Gods, or some good deeds. So How did Karna got Kawach kundal since birth? It means he was extremely lucky to get it free of cost, OR he did a penance to the Lord Surya on his previous life when he was a deamon named Dambhodabhava, who got 1000 Kawach kundal, out of which 999 were destroyed by Nara and Narayan (Arjuna and Krishna).
कर्ण तो फिर भी कर्ण ही था..। 1. कवच का दान भी झूठ था। 2. चार पांडवों को अभयदान झूठ था। 3. कृष्ण के प्रस्ताव को ठुकराना झूठ था। सूर्यपुत्र और विजयधनुष को धारण करने वाले योद्धा कों यूँ ही कुछ भी बोल दो...क्या हीं जाता हैं।
😂 भाई क्यों इतना दिल पे लेते हो। कर्ण कैसा भी हो पर वास्तव में था तो दुर्योधन के ही साथ। जो भी कृष्ण के विरुद्ध जायेगा वो चाहे कितना भी महान क्यों न हो उसका पतन तय है।
@Ahsankhan-cc9ie bhai hinduism ke baare mein koi kuch nahi Bata sakta yeh bohot jyada deep hai agar aap aur main apni puri zindagi bhi laga denge toh bhi sab kuch nahi jaan pyenge aap koh jis cheez ki zaroorat hai woh janlo aur chordo, like agar peace of mind aur self knowledge chaiye toh upnishad padlo aur agar kisi aur field ki knowledge chahiye toh usse related scriptures padhlo,love from India🙏❤️🇮🇳
अर्जुन सबसे श्रेष्ठ योद्धा था तत्काल समय का उसके सामने क्या कोई भी योद्धा टिक नहीं सकता था।दूसरी बात कृष्ण की परम कृपा पांडवो के ऊपर थी यही वजह थी कि महाभारत युद्ध में पांडवो विजय हुई.
Vagawan Krishna saved dharma, however, Karna fulfilled his duties and responsibilities honestly. That's why Vagawan Krishna was always happy about his struggles and daan. Destiny favors the dharma. So, Arjun lived and Karna took all the evils and sins along with the Kaurab brothers and Adharma sides by accepting death (badh). Therefore, we cannot compare God (Vagawan Krishna) with God's child (Karna). Whoever agrees with my concept please hit like...Thank you.
@@nitindange7569she is also krishna There are three characters in Mahabharata whose name was krishna First is lord himself lord Krishna 2nd is arjun who is also known as krishna 3rd is draupadi All three are called krishna many times in Mahabharata
If the karna was bad character then shri krishna had no need to use a tricks to kill him. He was such a great warriors and quite better then arjun. Just because he was in wrong side we can't consider him negative character 🙏
@@-ob1vxfattu to karn tha arjun ko dekhke kutte ki tarah bhagta tha virat yudh ho ya fir dropdi swayamvar yudh ho ya 14th day ka kurukshetra ka yudh ho 😂
@nishantrana3994 हाँ तो कर्ण विष्णु अवतार नहीं था। तेरे मेरे जैसा था। लड़ाई में बहुत कुछ होता है। याँ तो सबको भगौड़ा कहो। याँ सबको वही सम्मान दो। ये क्या बात की एक भाग गया एक ने लीला करी। श्री कृष्ण ने सदा आम आदमी जैसा व्यवहार किया। कालयवन को मारना था तो वे ले गए।
@@Paradox17AB औक़ात? जिस भगवान की तू बात कर रहा है, उन्हीं ने कर्ण को अर्जुन से अधिक माना था। टीवी सीरियल में मत देखना, महाभारत में पढ़ना। अधर्मी नहीं था वो कृतज्ञ था। आजकल वालों जैसा नहीं कि लाभ मिले तो बाप बदल लें मित्र क्या बड़ी चीज़ है।
People should not trust on only this type of human’s story. As I found every other person just came and trying to portrait KARAN as a villain.so please Just go and read original Mahabharata written by ved vyasji. If you want know true story about any character of Mahabharata.
Raja Parikshit ka ego nahin tha. Is 7 din mein unhone Srimad Bhagvat puran ka sravan kiya tha. Wo bhi Suk muni ji se jo ki apne janm ke turant baad hi adrishya ho gaye the. Us samay yeh bohot badi ghatna thi. Phir apne karm ke phal se mila abhisaap ko accept karna ek satyabadi raja ka dharm bhi hota hai. Isiliye woh mahan hain. Phir unko moksh mila. Agar deha tyagne se pehle unka ego rehta toh moksh milna asambhav tha.
Spiritual episodes are best category. But within Spiritual personages, try to discriminate between those give out book knowledge and those who have actually done Sadhana in caves or cremation grounds.
That’s a well put point although this is not really a spiritual episode technically speaking, this is a scripture/history based episode… where we are just trying to find out what really happened in Mahabharat. 😄
Are a koi tere school college ke mangadant bakwas kitab nahi ha a sastra praman ha jo satya ha aur maharshi ved vyas dwara dekh ke likha gaya ha jo bhagwan Krishna ke hi sabd ha. Hare Krishna Hari bol 👍🙏😀
@@AwaaraMusaafirश्लोक 4.14 copy न मां कर्माणि लिम्पन्ति न मे कर्मफले स्पृहा । इति मां योऽभिजानाति कर्मभिर्न स बध्यते ॥ १४ ॥ शब्दार्थ न-कभी नहीं; माम्-मुझको; कर्माणि-सभी प्रकार के कर्म; लिम्पन्ति-प्रभावित करते हैं; न-नहीं; मे-मेरी; कर्म-फले-सकाम कर्म में; स्पृहा-महत्त्वाकांक्षा; इति-इस प्रकार; माम्-मुझको; य:-जो; अभिजानाति-जानता है; कर्मभि:-ऐसे कर्म के फल से; न-कभी नहीं; स:-वह; बध्यते-बँध पाता है ।. अनुवाद play_arrowpause मुझ पर किसी कर्म का प्रभाव नहीं पड़ता, न ही मैं कर्मफल की कामना करता हूँ। जो मेरे सम्बन्ध में इस सत्य को जानता है, वह भी कर्मों के फल के पाश में नहीं बँधता।
@@AwaaraMusaafir श्लोक 7.15 copy न मां दुष्कृतिनो मूढा: प्रपद्यन्ते नराधमा: । माययापहृतज्ञाना आसुरं भावमाश्रिता: ॥ १५ ॥ शब्दार्थ न-नहीं; माम्-मेरी; दुष्कृतिन:-दुष्ट; मूढा:-मूर्ख; प्रपद्यन्ते-शरण ग्रहण करते हैं; नर-अधमा:-मनुष्यों में अधम; मायया-माया के द्वारा; अपहृत-चुराये गये; ज्ञाना:-ज्ञान वाले; आसुरम्-आसुरी; भावम्-प्रकृति या स्वभाव को; आश्रिता:-स्वीकार किये हुए ।. अनुवाद play_arrowpause जो निपट मूर्ख हैं, जो मनुष्यों में अधम हैं, जिनका ज्ञान माया द्वारा हर लिया गया है तथा जो असुरों की नास्तिक प्रकृति को धारण करने वाले हैं, ऐसे दुष्ट मेरी शरण ग्रहण नहीं करते।
The problem is that this person sitting in the studio is telling wrong things about Karna, the best warrior of Mahabharata, in reality Karna was a very great personality.Karna is not a villain, he knew that he had chosen the wrong side for the Mahabharata war.
Mahabharat karna never ran away from arjuna. He had the kavach and no one could defeat him and when he had no kavach arjuna killed him by deceit when he was lifting his carriage wheel. He was the most powerful and the best.
Ye to achi baat h aapka opinion badle bhi n main bhi yahi chahta hu, tabhi to ghor kalyug aayega jb adarmiyon ko idol bnaya jayega. Main to chahta hu log karn or ravan ko aur pyar karein taki adharm badhe kalyug badhe or sabka vinaash ho. Ye bhi jruri h
*@user-cv7ln2do6b* Karna doesn't exist anymore. He was great in doing Adharma, not in doing the right things. So there is nothing praiseworthy about Karna. Arjuna was the greatest character in the Mahabharata.
आस्तिक सर्प ने एक संस्कृत में मंत्र भी दिया था और कहा था कि यदि कोई सर्प को देखकर इस मंत्र का उच्चारण करता है तो वह सिर्प उस व्यक्ति को नहीं कटेगा । यह भी महाभारत में लिखा हुआ है यह भी महाभारत में लिखा हुआ है।
The thing is Karna(my hero) stop learning anything after staying with Duryadhona while Arjun kept learning all the skills including Deva Shastra even during the exile,thats why he knows more about the art of war
@@gol309How stupid Indra was - to save his son, he gave a deadly weapon so that Karna would kill his son Arjuna." ??- Sarcastically speaking. (Obviously it's a TRANSACTION, NOT ANY CHARITY)
*According to TV serials* "KARN was the greatest warrior and killed in unfair way by Arjun 😂 *But according to Mahabharat scripture* "KARN was as evil as Duryodhan and killed by Arjun in fair battle"
@@vibekpradhan3494sahi kaha lekin yaha karn aur Arjun ki baath chal rahi h tho abhimanyu kaha se agaya bich m ... aur karn tho adharmi tha hi lekin merko samjh nhi atha ye Arjun ke piche itne pagal kyo h jo vyakti apni patni ki raksha na kare aur waha mojud hokar bhi shant rahe usko log pasand kar rahe waah
जिसनें अपनी कवच कुंडल दान कर दिया कुंती अपनी माँ और पांडव उसकी भाई ये जानने के वाबजूद भी जिसे दुर्योधन का साथ नहीं छोड़ा कृष्ण भगवान है ये बात कर्ण को पता था फिर भी उसने युद्ध करना नहीं छोड़ा और तुम लोग कह रहे हो की गंधर्ब के सामने अपनी मित्र को संकट में छोड़ कर कर्ण भाग गया था 🤦♀️
@@AryanRaj-hi9wz महाभारत में लिखने से कुछ नहीं होता रहस्य को समझो महाभारत तो ये भी लिखा है की बर्बरिक जल्दी हीं युद्ध खत्म कर देता जबकि वो बकवास था भीष्म , अश्वथमा, जयद्रथ जैसे महाबली की वरदानी शक्ति को झूठा बना कर क्या बर्बरिक युद्ध खत्म कर देता Logic को समझो लिखने से कुछ नहीं होता
Karan k fans chinta mat lo inhone bola h karn ek band se arjun ki mrityu nischit thi agar krishna ji rath ko niche nhi karte toh arjun defeat nhi hota balki mar hi jata m isliye kehta hu karn acha tha par jabhi usne arjun ko harana cha jab jab usse bacha liya krishna ji n
IF KARNA WAS TRULY A VILLAIN, HE WOULD HAVE TAKEN THE OFFER KRISHNA GAVE TO HIM - Krishna told him, he was the eldest Pandava & if he switched sides, he would be made the emperor instead of Yudhistra & also would marry Draupadhi as the eldest Pandava. Karna rejected this, showing he was a man of character & how even good people support adharma, due to their goodness.
What a STUPID LOGIC you have: Nah!! Not at all. No, Karna had no dilemma at all regarding friendship. He would always choose Duryodhan over Krishna, as he already did. Denying Krishna was not a hard choice for him, as he was already a KING. Well it's easy for Karna to reject Krishna’s offers, as he was already a KING of Anga Desh. Besides that, Duryodhan, his besties, has biggest Empires, including Pandavas’s Indraprastha. So there is not much left to gain if he choose Pandavas side. Pandavas didn't have their own kingdom to live. Also, if Kauravas would have won the Mahabharata war, everything else would be under Prince Duryodhan’s empire. So, for KING Karna it wasn't a good deal, he won't sacrifice all those luxuries just for the sake of 'Dharma'. Also, he didn't consider Krishna as a Supreme God, but more as a Pandavas’s mentor. It's easy for him to choose the side of luxury lifestyle, which he already had, than the side of Dharma and Truth. In terms of moral ethics and virtues, any kind of friendship cannot be considered as greater than Dharma and truth. Krishna-Arjun friendship teaches us the true value of dharma - how to live one's life in a fair manner towards the path of Dharma. Whereas Karna- Duryodhan friendship was the usual, normal friendship, which DOESN'T TEACH ANYTHING. If Karna accepted Duryodhan's friendship, it was his choice, if he was in a dilemma that means he had no clarity and wisdom regarding dharma. Duryodhan made Karna a King, there was no sacrifice. Whereas Arjun rejected Krishna's Narayani Sena for Krishna - True friendship. Dharma is always greater than any friendship.
@@Red-Hood12 o.o we know your heart is with BRIHENLALA. You are fida, but let's get back to facts. Since Mahabharatha is actually deep, not like your family story. Stop trying to put your ORDINARY MANUSH spin to this deep saga. o.o We have no time for ur excremnt
@@Red-Hood12 Karna-Duryodhana friendship TEACHES intelligent people, NOT o.o foos like u. This is your problem, not ours. There is no cure for ur low intellect. Duryodhana helped Karna when no one else did. But the way Karna had to return it was by shepherding Duryodhana in the right path. At least, he could have saved his life by NOT supporting him in war. This is what Mahabharatha teaches via Karna-Duryodhana saga. o.o what we learnt from this? You people can only learn if we bring our SLIPPER into equation. It is what u are
जिसके बाण ने कृष्णा और बजरंग का रथ को दो कदम पीछे धकेल दिया था जिसने अपना कवच कुंडल दान में दे दिया पांच पांडवों की जान भीख मे दे दिया वो करण भागे गए 😂😂
Some people are giving the argument that, if Arjun is more powerful than Karna then why Indra took his Kavach. People need to understand the simple fact that, nobody could kill Karna because of that Kavach, but he could be defeated. Defeat and death are two different things. Karna lost against Drupad, Chitrasen defeated Karna in Gandhrva war and Karna fled from the war, Bheem defeated Karna when Bheem went to Anga desh for Ashwamedh yagna, Whole Kuru army along with Karna got defeated by Arjun alone. Apart from the separation of Kunti, his whole life was way more happier and privileged than Pandavas. Serial lovers should at least cross check the details.
One more thing , everyone who had any kind of divine weapons or power they achieved either with education or tapasya , and upon death everything was taken from them . Karna was the only who got protection right from birth which was injustice towards other warriors that’s why Indra takes it and calls out Sun God for his discrimination
।।।।कोई नही समझेंगा भाई! अब महाभारत दो हिस्सो मे बट गई है- एक अर्जुन और दूसरा कर्ण। इन दोनो के अलावा लोगो के पास महाभारत में कोई चर्चा का विषय ही नही है। महाभारत में ययाति चरित्र आता है, जो की एक बहुत अच्छा चर्चा का विषय हो सकता है। पर लोग बात करते नही। महाभारत में कुरुक्षेत्र के युद्ध के बाद पितामह भीष्म और युधिष्ठिर के संवाद में बहुत सी ज्ञान की बाते है, पर कोई चर्चा नहीं करता। महाभारत में भागवत गीता है, अनु गीता है, काम गीता है, इतने सारे टॉपिक है पर अर्जुन कर्ण के अलावा कुछ लोगो को चर्चा करने का इंटरेस्ट ही नही है। जब सच बताए तो इन्हे लगता है की कर्ण की बुराई कर रहे है। अब सीरियल्स ने कर्ण को हीरो देखा दिया है इसी कारण इनके मन में कर्ण को लेकर अलग ही इमेज बन गई है, जिस कारण कितना भी सच बोल दो इंच कर्ण को ही सपोर्ट करना होता है। जिसने कृष्ण को नही चुना उसे भला कोन फैन हो सकता है। इसमें कोई संदेह नहीं को कर्ण एक अच्छा योद्धा था पर अर्जुन तो अर्जुन ही था। इन्हे लगता है की इतिहास जितने वाले लिखते है। अगर दुर्योधन जीता होता तो बात कुछ और होती। कुछ भी बिना सिर पैर की बाते करते है।
@@jaymahajan1695 ekdam sahi kaha bhai, Mahabharat mein bohot si aysi cheez hai jo hume sikhna chahiye. Gita ka gyan, Yudhishir ka Bhisma pitamah se gyan lena, Vidur niti, Kurukshetra se pehle ka shanti samjhote ka prayas... In sabhi cheez bohot important hai. Vedvyas ne Karna ko Shakuni se bhi bura bataya hai, woh ek adharmi tha jo bachpan me Bheem ko zaher deke marne mei shamil tha, lakshyagraha ke plan mei shamil tha, hamesha se Arjun se jalta raha, Draupadi ko veshya keh ke apman kiya, virat yudh ke pehe Kripacharya and Dronacharya ko apman kiya, Madra desh ke raja Shalya ke samne Madra desh ki mahilayon ko apman kiya, Parshuram se jhoot bolke divyastra sikhne ki kosish kiya, aur bhi bohot kuch. Liberals ne apne matlab keliye Karna ko hero banaya hai.
@@pramitkhan7729 ये बात आपने सही कही है। पर यही बात कोई किसी पॉडकास्ट में बोले तो लोगो को बुरा लग जाता है। महाभारत मुझे बहुत पसंद है, महाभारत की चर्चा करना उससे भी ज्यादा पसंद है, पर बस एक ये पागलपंती के कारण की लोग महाभारत पड़ने के बाद भी कर्ण को पसंद कर ही कैसे सकते है, मुझे महाभारत की चर्चा करना अच्छा नहीं लगता। 😂वैसे भी भगवान खुद कहते है की नास्तिको और जो मेरी लीलाओं को न समझ सके उससे कभी मेरी लीलाओं का वर्णन करना भी नही चाहिए। अर्जुन जैसा धनुर्धर कोई है ही नही। खुद भीष्म, द्रोणाचार्य और अश्वथामा भी अर्जुन को अजय मानते थे। 😂पर कर्ण भक्तों की बुद्धि भी कर्ण और दुर्योधन जैसे ही है जो उन्हें लगता है की भीष्म और द्रोण पूरी ताकत से अर्जुन के साथ युद्ध नही कर रहे है, जब की ये झूठ है। अर्जुन हर एक दिव्यास्त्र का तोड़ जनता था। जो द्रोणाचार्य जानते थे, वो तो अर्जुन भी जनता था। अर्जुन ने सब कुछ सीख लिया था, यही कारण था कि द्रोणाचार्य अर्जुन को अजय मानते था। 😂क्युकी ऐसा कोई परीक्षा ही नही थी जिसे पार करना अर्जुन ना जनता हो।।।।।।।।।
Yudhistir said these words when arjun ran away from karna in fear of bhargavastar Source: Bori CE Chapter 1198(48) . O Partha! Keshava drives you. How have you withdrawn as a result of your fear of Karna? O evil-souled one! Had you given the bow to Keshava and become his charioteer in the battle, then Keshava would have slain the fierce Karna, like the lord of the Maruts 593 bringing down Vritra with his vajra. It would have been better had you not been born in Pritha's womb, but had been aborted in the fifth month itself. O prince! O evil-souled one! That would have been better than withdrawing from the field of battle."
@@xxtoxicxx5139 mai yeh nahi keh raha ki Karn hi sarwashrest tha wahi sabse mahan tha mai bas yeh keh raha hu ki Karn nafrat karne layak bhi nahi tha. Aur yeh bachcho ki tarah yeh mahan ki kam mahan yeh sab karke koi fayeda nahi Karn ko aise hi danveer Karn nahi kaha jaata aur haan mai yeh bhi janta hu ki Pandavo ke pass dharm tha nahi toh Shree Krishna unki orr se kyu the
The questions the guy is asking just goes to show how simplistic ppl want things to be and want everything to be served on a platter rather than even try to understand and appreciate the nuances and complexities. We have been trained to think in only one way, the Western way
@@AwaaraMusaafir Nepali hindu here. And I discovered your channel recently through ami gantara and I really loved that and also your recent podcast with arun pandit. Looking forward to learn more from you and your guests.
Puri baat kyi nahi btayi Virat yudh ki , arjun gandiv use kar rha tha or karna normal bow se lad rha tha uske baad bhi usne takar di thee , lekin arjun ke sath bhi bura hora tha usse yudh mein thats true lekin pura reference Dena chaiye
Are gyani agar normal bow hai to dusri baar kyo aaya Aur Arjun us hi nahi lad Raha tha bhism kripa drona ashwathama ye bhi the duryodhan aur uske Bhai itno se lad Raha tha
Bow karan jaisa bhi raha ho, per Arjun puri Sena aur maharathiyo se akela lada aur unko haraya. Arjun Balshaali bhi hai aur Mahaan bhi. Karn kuch nahi hai, Arjun ke saamne. Karna ka bekaar ki publicity ki hai.
I think arjun and karn they were not greatest warrior in Mahabharata.. both of them used chal ... But in my point abhimanyu was the no. 1 warrior in Mahabharat battle with 16 year age
First of all karna himself one of the kontaye and elder brother, student of bhagwaan parshuram. If all pandavs are strong then he too so powerful💪. Secondly Chalo maan b le ki karna kaye bar hara hi to aise to krishna bhagwaan ne b arjun ko 2-3 bar karna se bachaya hi. Agar karan itna strong ni tha to ye to sab mante he haina ki uska kavach kundal liya gya and dhoke se mara gya. Agar strong ni tha to kavach kundal and dhoke se marne ki jarurut he kyo pade? Ispar to koi yakeet he ni krega yes aap keh skte ho just like any two powerful teams or player's sometimes some battles can be won or loose by someone it's doesn't means ki wo kam powerful hi . And last don't forget that karn not use his vijay dhanush in all battles he used it only in main mahabharat battlefield on the other hand arjun always use his gandiv.
Vadan aur shrap naam ki bhi koi cheez hoti hai bhai,karn ko yuhi nahi mara usne apni jeevan mein bohut sara pap kiya tha isliye usko aisi maut mili,aur rahi baat vijaya dhanush ki toh karn anth tak vijaya dhanush ke sath hi ladh rha tha,marne se pehle bhi uske haat mein Vijaya dhanush hi tha
Arjun ne karn kya bigada tha? Woh koi daridri ghar mein nahi pala badha. woh Arjun dweshi tha woh ekmatra vyakti hai jisne drupadi ko vyesaha kaha. Woh yudha chahata tha.Apne dil per haath rakh kar sochiye arjun ko pata chalta ki karn uska bhai hai toh? Karn khalanayak hai, Abhimanyue ko mars woh chal gaya kya? Karn and dhritarashtra was responsinble for yudha.karn yudh rok sakta tha par arjun ko harana iss ekhi udeshya ke liye itna narsanhar hone diya, apne ahankar ke liye kul ka naash kiya.Aap kya bhagwan ko galat mante hai kya? Karn shuru se hi galat hi tha. Writers ne uska avadambar machaya hai, vyasji ka nazaria alag hai.
Dekh bhai krishn jo ki bhagwan the unone Arjun ko Chuna dharm ke sthapna keley agar krishna ne usko Chuna to obviously wo humans me greatest hoga Arjun nar hai and krishna Narayan.. that's it
He's cheater, liar, bhagoda..... arjun had very Astra from devta by doing penance unlike liar karna. And about कवच, kundal 😂😂😂 he already knew about it 😂 coz his father surya dev told him😂😂😂 and uske saath koi chal nai hua tha uske badle Mai usne bhi indrastra manga tha😂😂 agar itna hi strong tha toh gandharvo se kyu BHAGA😂😂 AUR HAAN "KARNA IS THE ONE WHO TOLD DUSHASAN TO TAKE OFF DRAUPADI'S CLOTHES 😂"😂 even told her beshya. What a great man 😢
@@prathmeshmore1938 bhai arjun ko sab like karte hai not because he's nar because he listens. Usne apna adhe se jyada Jeevan van Mai bitaya hai.sabka samman karta hai unlike karna who's always jealous and furious 😂
Mtlb rehna toh bewakoof hi h. Saath dena toh galat ka hi h😂😂 Karan ko sai maan ne vale logo ke saath problem bhi uske jesi hi h khud ko glt maan na hi nhi h.
When we claim that Karna was cowardly and fled from battle, aren't we undermining the profound education imparted by Bhagwan Parshuram and the noble values instilled by Maa Radha? By questioning Karna's bravery, we inadvertently cast doubt on the teachings and upbringing provided by these revered figures, who shaped his character and principles.
KARNA WAS ALSO PROVEN TO BE BETTER THAN ALL 5 PANDAVAS IN THE END, NOT JUST ARJUNA - He was better mace fighter than Bheema, better at spear than Yudhistra, Better at sword play than Nakula, Sehadeva & of course better at bowmanship than his smaller brother Arjuna. Truly, the most powerful Pandava & the eldest brother of the five. The proof is Krishna himself. If Karna was weaker than Arjuna, Krishna would never interfere. Because Karna was more powerful than Arjuna, even without his Kavacha, Kundala, Vasavi Shakti arrow, so Krishna interfered in the fight & told Arjuna to vadh Karna when the curses took effect, else Arjuna would never get the chance to vadh Karna again.
@@User124-c1y Bhagwan only interferes, when the evil side is more powerful. Karna, Bhisma, Drona were more powerful than all 5 Pandavas combined. Arjuna could never vadh Karna if Arjuna did not use the weak point of Karna, when he is defenseless due to curses. Krishna knew that, now u o.o do too.
In Mahabharat main warrior from Pandav side was Arjun . Shri Krishna ji gave the knowledge of Gita to Arjun cause, Arjun was unwilling to fight against his won brother, guru, grandfather Bhishma.. Even after getting the knowledge from krishna ji Arjun still not fight with his potential and power . After the death of veer abhimanyu Arjun fight with some of his potential . Karna left duryodhana alone in the battle against Gandharva and flew away , Arjun save duryodhana Karna left duryodhana again in the battle of virat. Arjun beat all the warrior twice before he used samohani astra . Only ashwatthama gave hard fight against arjun ,karn flew away twice. Except Dronacharya, Bhishma, kripacharya , other warrior were undress by Arjun . Shri Krishna gave Arjun a name called 'vijaya' means one who won all war . Arjun praised as' parantapa' by Lord Krishna ji in Bhagavad Gita.. Parantapa means - one who conquered enemies.. Bhagavad gita chapter 4 , verse 5 - Lord Krishna said" both you and I have had many birth , o Arjun , you have forgotten them, while i remember them all , O Parantapa " Before say something research it
@@IQuit1999 so o.o much writing, but you still cannot get the fact straight. Karna was stronger than the 5 pandavas combined. Krishna knew this, so he interfered. There was no need to interfere with Karna, if what you say is truth, little boi o.o
Mujhe ye nehi pata karn rath se utar ke kyu nehi Lada ? Mahabharat me har ek yodha rath se utar ke lada hai . Lord Shiva Statement’s Narrative- As per Lord Shiva, Neither Humans nor Devta Possess it. ‘The illustrious god said, “O Pandava! I will give you the great pashupata weapon, dear to me. You will be capable of bearing, releasing and withdrawing it. The great Indra, Yama, the king of the yakshas,292 Varuna and Vayu do not know it. How can it be known to humans? Even Arjuna said that Karna didn’t possess Pashupat- I possess theterrible and great weapon that Pashupati gave me when there was a duel with the hunter.114 At the end of a yuga, that is employed by Pashupati to destroy all the beings. O tiger amongmen! I know how to use that. Gangeya does not know this, nor do Drona and Goutama. Oking! Neither do Drona’s son and the son of the suta. Arjun never use pasupatastra cause there were no warrior in the Kauravas, who was more powerful than Arjun . Pasupatastra need just a second to kill all Kauravas but as well as it destroy the whole universe . When you have great divine power it comes responsibility.
SONY-PUTRA KARNA TV SHOW ek FAKE Show hai jo sirf Karna FANS ke liye hi banaya gayaa hai, magar ismein bhi karna apne raath kaa pahiyaa uthaane mei asamarth hai, ye hai uski taakat. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@aliali115-ny3dv Even Shikhandi beats Karna also..😆😆😆😆😆😆 ‘ “O great king! Shikhandi, the slayer of Bhishma, roamed around fearlessly and countered Karna with his arrows. Countered, Karna’s lips quivered in rage. He struck Shikhandi between his eyebrows with three arrows. With those arrows stuck there, Shikhandi looked exceedingly beautiful. He was like a silver mountain with three peaks. In the battle, having been thus grievously struck by the son of a suta in the encounter, he pierced Karna with ninety sharp arrows. Karn retreated and failed to counter the arrows of Shikhandi." Karn parv chapter 44(BORI)
@@aliali115-ny3dv Karna was so coward, he got scared to fight with Arjuna in the final Mahabharata war, as he already knew, he was going to lose (as usual🤣🤣🤣), so he made an excuse not to fight war as long as Bheeshma was alive, as Duryodhan, this time, would send Karna directly to fight with Arjuna alone (Karna always used to attack Arjuna in Groups and still he loose🤣🤣🤣). But after Bheeshma's fall Karna had no choice but to fight, or else he would be labelled as a 'Coward'. Karna was not rejected by Bheeshma not to participate in the war, it was Karna's own choice. Karna was a KING of Anga Desh, which was a separate Kingdom than Hastinapur, so Bheeshma had NO JURISDICTION over Karna at all, also Bheeshma was a Commander in Chief of Hastinapur, NOT a KING, so he cannot give any order to another King - Karna. Besides that, Duryodhan was a king, so he can give order. (Karna took a vow not to fight alongside Bheeshma as long as Bheeshma was alive - This is clearly mentioned in Ved Vyas ji's Mahabharata), Obviously it was Karna's choice as he could fight separately alongside Kauravas, but he didn’t, CLEARLY HE WAS SCARED OF ARJUNA.
Also we know that history that history is written by winners not loosers, Prove that the writer was not biased. WE praise karna because you never beat him on same grounds. You took benefit of him on his lowest state saying this that paap. we indians came to a point that we think he was killed not on the war rules. Now because Indians are educated, they can connect the dots. Thanks
No Shri Krishna is real hero. Dharma sansthapanarth sambhawami yuge yuge. Karn is nothing infornt of Krishna. Just 8 year boy defeat danav kansa in dandva yudha fight till only man survive and one has to dead . Krishna at 8 year age Just with power of hand no weapon . And even karna can't beat age old kansa father in law jarasandh. Yututsva was better than karna . He choose Dharma marg instead of adharma marg. Karn can't take correct decision to choose Dharma he can't be hero.
These are thousand of year old epics, there are different versions of the story with the same characters. There is no such thing as 100% accuracy with mahabharata.
![ARGENTINA vs. PERÚ [1-0] | RESUMEN | ELIMINATORIAS SUDAMERICANAS | FECHA 12](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/xtI25ENDDSY/mqdefault.jpg)
Episode kaisa lagaa?
Accha lagaa toh like button zarur se dabaaye! ♥️
✨ Ami Ganatra on Ramayan - ruclips.net/video/Y6Q5hpTAzNQ/видео.html
✨ Apna Bhagya Badlo - ruclips.net/video/9lkUh4tZTCo/видео.html
Want to get featured on the podcast?
Write to us on jayesh@awaaramusaafir.com
Bas Karo yar
Sab kalpan hai
श्लोक 4.14 copy
न मां कर्माणि लिम्पन्ति न मे कर्मफले स्पृहा ।
इति मां योऽभिजानाति कर्मभिर्न स बध्यते ॥ १४ ॥
शब्दार्थ
न-कभी नहीं; माम्-मुझको; कर्माणि-सभी प्रकार के कर्म; लिम्पन्ति-प्रभावित करते हैं; न-नहीं; मे-मेरी; कर्म-फले-सकाम कर्म में; स्पृहा-महत्त्वाकांक्षा; इति-इस प्रकार; माम्-मुझको; य:-जो; अभिजानाति-जानता है; कर्मभि:-ऐसे कर्म के फल से; न-कभी नहीं; स:-वह; बध्यते-बँध पाता है ।.
अनुवाद
play_arrowpause मुझ पर किसी कर्म का प्रभाव नहीं पड़ता, न ही मैं कर्मफल की कामना करता हूँ। जो मेरे सम्बन्ध में इस सत्य को जानता है, वह भी कर्मों के फल के पाश में नहीं बँधता।
@@niyug-tp8rh श्लोक 7.15 copy
न मां दुष्कृतिनो मूढा: प्रपद्यन्ते नराधमा: ।
माययापहृतज्ञाना आसुरं भावमाश्रिता: ॥ १५ ॥
शब्दार्थ
न-नहीं; माम्-मेरी; दुष्कृतिन:-दुष्ट; मूढा:-मूर्ख; प्रपद्यन्ते-शरण ग्रहण करते हैं; नर-अधमा:-मनुष्यों में अधम; मायया-माया के द्वारा; अपहृत-चुराये गये; ज्ञाना:-ज्ञान वाले; आसुरम्-आसुरी; भावम्-प्रकृति या स्वभाव को; आश्रिता:-स्वीकार किये हुए ।.
अनुवाद
play_arrowpause जो निपट मूर्ख हैं, जो मनुष्यों में अधम हैं, जिनका ज्ञान माया द्वारा हर लिया गया है तथा जो असुरों की नास्तिक प्रकृति को धारण करने वाले हैं, ऐसे दुष्ट मेरी शरण ग्रहण नहीं करते।
@@niyug-tp8rhReality hai bhai
Kalpana nahi...
@@planetearth1507
Lolz
Koi proof ?
The Ones who read The Mahabharata knows the Truth , Others watch TV serials and believe it.
Everyone reads Mahabharat much b4 it came as serial or movies
@@subhadeepmandal2221I have read Mahabharata before I watched it in TV.
Karna was the only donor in Mahabharata. Everybody else was either beggar or usurper in Mahabharata. War is not everything. The War spaned mere 18 days.
That's why Karna is great. Sri Krishna did the last rites of Karna on his own hand. He didn't do it for Bheeshma or Yudhishthir or Arjuna.
युधिष्ठिर और अर्जुन कृष्ण जी के बाद मारे है न की कर्ण की जैसे । और रही बात कर्ण की तो जब वो मारा गया था तब पांडव और दूर्यधान के बीच मैं लड़ाई हो रहा था इसीलिए उन्होंने ऐसा किया और भीष्म जी के वक्त तो ऐसा कोई दुविधा नहीं आई थी @@coolfreaks68
@@coolfreaks68Arjun supporter nhi manne ge 😅
@@coolfreaks68to phir Raja shibi kon he,
The Mystery of Mahabharata is that almost all Main Characters have their own Right and Wrong Both, The Moral of the Mahabharat Katha is to Keep Dharma High above All under any circumstances.
Exactly each character got his/her point which kind of depicts human nature and encourages to keep dharma above all
True .....both kurav and pandav are equally right and same time wrong toooo.
@@sajisebastian8412 In simple words, in the pursuit of their personal duties, everyone forgets that they also live in a society. Due to their mutual enmity and ignorance, this problem spreads from home to society.
Arjuna is Real warrior of mahabharata 🥰👍🙏jai shree krishna ❤️
Tm khud pdhi h mahabhart
Tm khud pdhi h mahabhart
@@KaminiSaini-p9i didi jo bta rha h vo expert hai usne apni zindagi k Kai saal Lgaye hai smjhi 😂
Isly no dialogue
Or vese v serial me to Karn aaj v great hai q tnsn Le rhi ho
He was defeated Fair and Square. Chronology of events :-
In battle karna is badly injured and bathed in blood even before his chariot wheel sunk.
The wheel of karnas chariot sink in earth. By this time Arjuna had invoked Raudrastra against him but takes back after his chariot wheel sinks.
Karna invokes Dharma and asks Arjuna and Krishna to stop.
Krishna shows him Mirror by reminding him all his Adharmas right from Poisoning of bhima , abusing and mistreatment of draupadi to deceitful killing of Abhimanyu and rejects his arguments.
Karna hangs down Head in Shame and understands that his trick is failed. Krishna asks Arjuna to continue battle.
Karna Arjuna battle begins again. Karna invokes Brahmastra from ground with great difficulty and Arjuna counters it with his own Brahmastra.
Arjuna fires Agneya Weapon and Karna counters with Varuna astra and covers sky with cloud.
Arjuna nullifies Varuna Weapon with Vayavya Weapon.
Then Arjuna took out Anjalika arrow and fixed on bow and uttered the speech that if he has practiced ascetic austerities , gratified elders and superiors , and listening to the council of well wishers then let this arrow slay his enemy karna.
Arjuna Shoots the Anjalika arrow and it cuts off the Head of Karna.
He was killed Fair and Square. He had weapons which he used and countered Arjunas weapons also from ground..
Note :- My Answer is Based on Authentic Versions of Mahabharat BORI CE and KMG.
So taking his armor and shrap of parushuram and rishi this are incient to make him weak for fighiting arjun
Some script writer somewhere twisted the Mahabharata to say that draupadi laughed at duryodhana. 2 generations actually believed this to be true. Only because we have social media now and ami and this sir are telling that draupadi never laughed, we know it was never there in the original Mahabharata. In this way, fictionalising books and giving them creative freedom will propagate false narratives and make people laugh at their own religion or go away from it without even knowing the truth. It's a very dangerous thing to do. If these many versions exist, know one will know the true version after a certain point of time.
In bori ce, it is clearly stated that vastraharn is an interpolation, 2 generations passed , but none cared to read the authenticity 😢
1. bhai, saree traditional culture hain, phele aurate ekavastra phenti thi
2. if y consider virat war, tb arjun ne khha tha ki unse ghandiv 65 saal pheli milli hain, uss hisab se abhimanyu 65+ years hona chaiye, but dikhaya jata hain 16
3. droupadi ke sirph 1 patti tha [yudhisthir] but stories ne usse paach patti bnna diya😭 , aur thi to mata kunti ne bhi dropadi ko whhi khha tha jo karn ne khha tha
4. krishn ne karn ko vrish khha tha, vrish mtlb dharmatma
5. karn ko nhhi ptta tha ti ashwasen uske dhanush mein baitha hain, uska apna arjun se pratishod tha
6. arjun subhadra ka koi love angle ye sb nhhi tha, usne jbardasti usse uthaya tha, tb krishn ne bhi arjun ko bola tha ki ye glt hain
@@good114 source ??
Why draupadi didn't laugh at duryodhan
@@good114it also stated that draupadi laughed at duryodhana
I have some doubts
1.What If lord Krishna didn't save Arjuna while karna used nagastra
2.What if karna used Vijaya dhanush which was used by lord shiva, from starting only. Because he used that bow only for last 3 days
3.Why Arjuna didn't kill when karna had Dhanush in his hand ?
4. why Arjuna killed when karna has no weapon in his hand
5. What if Arjuna and karna fights without any odds ?
It's not about movie or serial, I'm just curious
Add one more question if karna was weak than why Indra dev takes karna kunthal and kavach
He got vijaya dhanush cuz of curse that parshuram gave him . He got dhanurvidhya by faking out his caste .parshuramji got angry and cursed him but after that he realised that he was curious and so excited to learn brahmastra so he gave him a rath or a chariotee which was the strogest in the mahabharat . After that he also gave him vijaya dhanush
Sorry meri english thodi bad h but yeah vijaya dhanush koi mamuli dhanush nai h the person who holds it will be invicible in battle aur may be parshuramji ne bola ho ise 1 hi baar use kr skte ho?😊
@@surajbhalerao5259 simple he was weak but unkillable. A mosquito may be tiny and fragile but its persistence and ability to evade make it more troublesome than its strength. Its weakness is overshadowed by how hard it is to get rid of.
@@surajbhalerao5259Yes that's the big point..
Part 1:- Was Vijaya bow of Karna Mahadeva's bow ?
No. It was not. Vijaya bow was bow of Indra. From Indra it went to Parashurama and then to him as per Karna himsrlf. No where Vijaya bow is mentioned as bow of Mahadeva. Even Rukmi is descibred having Vijaya bow. So we don't know for sure who really had original Vijaya bow or karna was just bluffing.
My bow, Vijaya, is supreme among all weapons. Vishvakarma constructed it for Indra’s sake. It was with this that Shatakratu vanquished large numbers of daityas. In the ten directions, the daityas were confounded because of its roar. Shakra gave that revered weapon to Bhargava and Bhargava gave that divine and supreme bow to me.With this, I will fight against the mighty-armed Arjuna, foremost among victorious ones, like Indra fighting in a battle against all the assembled daityas.
BORI CE translation by Bibek Debroy Karna Parva Chapter 1172(22)
Part 2:- Was Vijaya bow used for Destruction of Tripura?
No again. The bow used by Mahadeva to destroy Tripura was constructed by Vishwakarma from Mountain and it was the same bow which Shri Ram broke in Mithila. So it is not true. Parashurama himself said in mithila that shri Ram broke the bow used by Shiva to scorch Tripura.
Oh, best one among men, out of the two longbows gods gave one to restive Trymbaka, God Shiva for a combat with demon Tripura, and oh, Kakutstha, that bow alone is the annihilator of Tripura, the demon... and you have broken that alone.
Part 3:- Is true that if Vijaya bow is Shiva's bow then the holder of Vijaya's bow can never be defeated ?
Again no and false. From first two parts it is already answered that Vijaya bow is not the bow of Mahadeva. And whether bow is Vijaya or some other bow it never guarantees victory to anyone. It is warrior who fights battles not bow. Victory and defeat depends on warriors. Karna himself was defeated on 17th day by Bhima with Vijaya bow in hand. Even Karna himself or Parashurama or Indra never made this absurd claim.
The son of the wind god powerfully stretched the bow back, all the way up to his ears. Wishing to kill Karna, the great archer angrily released the arrow. Having been thus released by the powerful one, the arrow, with a sound like that of the vajra or thunder, struck Karna in that battle, with a force like that of the vajra against a mountain. O extender of the Kuru lineage! Thus struck by Bhimasena, the son of the suta, the leader of an army, lost his senses and sank down on the floor of his chariot. On seeing that the son of the suta had lost his senses, the lord of Madra bore Karna, the adornment of a battle, away on the chariot. When Karna was defeated, the large army of the sons of Dhritarashtra was driven away by Bhimasena, like an army of the danavas by Indra.” ’
BORI CE translation by Bibek Debroy Karna Parva Chapter 1184(34).
So neither Vijaya bow was bow of Mahadeva , nor it was used in battle and destruction of Tripura and nor it gives any victory to wielder.
Karna was a real villain, due to his jealousy & pride the mahabharat war resulted & 50 lakh warriors died . Duryodhana fought the war depending on Karna mainly. Karna instigated Duryodhana to pullout clothes from devi Droupadi s body. Karna was a main villain to kill Abhimanyu along with sapta rathi.
First villain is dhritarashtra because he didn't provided the throne to pandu sons as promised then he supported his evil son ideas & wrong doing.
The problem is people want to see things in black and white. The world doesn't work like that. These so called experts clearly know that karn is that grey character in mahabharatha whom people have interpreted and perceived differently. He is the most humane character in mahabharatha unlike all the unreal characters. He is a good man who had committed some unforgivable deeds and sins out of hate, jealousy, anger and pride. That's us. That's a human. Imperfect and forever improving.
The guy before the war knew that he was in the wrong and his ultimate fate is fatality handed to him by his arch rival. He accepts all these infront of vasudev. There is a long ass intimate conversation between karn and vasdev before the war where he is vulnerable. He reveals himself there and you can clearly see the good in him. Even vasudev calls him "narashrestha"-the best among men and offers him the throne saying that he is equally capable to yudhistir if not more and deserves it as a seniormost kountaya. The guy outright rejects it.
These people won't mention these interactions. They just want bash a beloved character, create controvesry and benefit from it.
Ohh finally someone said it... Thank you 👍 totally agree with you 😊
Starplus ki mahabharata dekh kr comment krne waale pasu, aali mahabharat padd ,, sale whats app university k chapri
@@220kVSstnHVPNLKaithal aali mahabharath tere ghar mein milta hoga woh kya hota hai mujhe nahi pata. Baki bori ce aur kmg mahabharata mein padh chuka hoon.
Yes Karna Is Great
@@neerajbholan5369 bori Mahabharata critical edition padho
This is reality ye kaliyug Hai Yahaa karna bhi hero Hai or Ravan bhi😢
Multiverse के अनुसार काकभूषांडी ने ११ बार रामायण ऑर १६ बार महाभारत देखे हे diffrent universe and different time line में तो तुम क्या ही कर्ण ऑर रावण की बात करते हो
@IndianHeart07 aur Har baar adharmi kamjor hi they, Dharm veer sadaiv Shakti maan
Ji sahi kaha aapne
@@yatendragoswami5761 es hisaab se toh tu bhi hero hi hua .... Kyuki tujhme bhi toh ek ravan hai .....karan or ravan me diffrence hai ye jaan le
Virat yudhh ke bare me aap galat bata rahe ho. bhishm pitama ne pratigya li thi ki wo stree , kinnar upar shastra nahi uthaega isi karan unhone sikhandani ke samne apna shastra tyag diya tha ...lekin aapne virat yudhh me pitmah bhishm ko bhi lada ke hara diaya
KARNA WAS A GOOD MAN, IN ORIGINAL MAHABHARATHA - This o.o is the whole point of his character arc, how a good man, supports Adharma & meets his end. Karna does not knowinglt shoot snake arrow. The snake sat on the arrow without Karna knowing, as the snake had a vendata against Arjun. When it missed, first time, it went back to Karna to ask his permission this time, but Karna said no. He wants to win by himself.
Was searching for this comment
Which is original Mahabharata?
Nothing like this happened in original mahabharat. Ashwasen never asked karna second time, after karna's arrow got missed, Arjun killed the snake.
@@tusharranjan1054 - what bs o.o u type, we believe lol zoomr. There is an entire verse about the snake. o.o foos tryin so hard to rewrite Mahabharatha, which has multi levels but these mistakes we call zoomrs tryin so hard to pretend they understand mahabharatha lol
@@r.b.8018 o.o the one that u tried to re-write
I have heard so many podcasts and sab ka yahi question aaj ka generation yeh padhega nahi isko modify karna hai kya...simple answer to this is both are epics are relevant irrespective of time. Original text is so powerful ki usko "aaj ki generation " ke liye modify karne ki zaroorat nahi hai balki aaj ki generation ko Original text padhna chahiye
Original to destroy ho chukaa hai 1000saal pehle hi
how to read original
Rip kalki movie😂
Prabhash role was very cringe just like karn 😂😂😂
About the question where was the Krishna. You need to look at it in different way. “Play your own game people, yes I’m there but I will not play everybody’s game. Yes I’m born as a human as a awatar doesn’t mean you’ll not do anything.” So anybody looking for different answer this is what I found out and one famous sentence said by Krishna “hesitation is worst than any crime”.
this thought of yours is exactly what happend with mahabharta, people tried speculating and went on adding there own fantasy
@@vibhavraikar4233 There is additional fantasy exist in Mahabharata. Everything is clearly written in the scriptures of Mahabharata.
chinta mat kro vo real wali Mahabharat bta rahe hai tumhari Ekta Kapoor wali me Karna aaj bhi upar hai sbse😂
Epic bro 👍
real wali ? mythology real bi hoti he ?
@@ritullathiya5192 haan kitab padhna use kehte hai real wali
@@ritullathiya5192 in that book karna lost twice to Satyaki and Bheem lost to Abhimanyu in 1 on 1 battle on the day he was killed lost to Arjun during Swayamwar ViratYudh and many more occasions but they never showed it on Television they all are just portraying negative character as a hero
Haa Bhai ye Jo mahabharat bta rhe h ye inke sapne me Hui thi ..... Real me karna hi powerful h
Yahi kali hai... Yaha... Karn, Duryodhan, Ravan aur Indrajeet ka bhi victimisation hota hai.... 😂😂😂😂
Indrajeet ko maat include kroo Karna ko kr rahe hoo whoo bhi galat hai but Indrajeet sach mai bhaut sahi thaa usne sirf apne Pita ki baat manii hai Indrajeet Mahan hai ❤❤
Karna was neither a villain nor a hero. He was a human being. He has good and bad characteristics in him.
*@anujamarathe8339* Karna was indeed a villain, not a hero, because he willingly supported Adharma. He was not the only human being; even Arjuna was also a human, but he was much better than Karna. Arjuna had both good and bad characteristics in him, but he always chose the good over the bad, unlike Karna.
@@jaydutta7711 in Mahabharat the 1st villian is Dhrutarashtra who always supported his adharmi son Duryodhan and his wicked ideas and plans to end Pandavas. He also planned to kill Bhim by hugging him.
@@anujamarathe8339 I agree 👍
Karna is a villain gtfo
@@soulflower2021Although he supported Duryodhan ( Adharm) , he has some good characteristics also that other Kouravas didn't have.
Dhuryodhan doesn't know dice gambling and seeks support of Saguni whereas Yuthistra also not familiar with that gambling, was not interested to seek support of Krishna! Until unless you seek and pray for assistance, even God will not come for suport!
Esa hai to tata by by bhgwan ko kisi ka rape ho ra hoga to use bhgwan ko pukarna chahiye tbhi help hogi wrna ni hogi lol
Whatever you say, the proverb still exists “Danbir Karna” from time immemorial.
Ekdum Sahi
Right
Daanveer Raja Harishchandra ✅
Karn was not a Daanveer. Infact he "exchanged" his Kawach to get Shakti Parv astra from Indradev
It was not a DAAN but a trade !!
If Ambani is giving jio free is he danveer? Waise hi adani godrej Ambani daan karenge aur dusre taraf galat karenge apne bete ko Aston Martin hit and run case mai jhok denge tou wo badhiya nahi hai😅
@@tonguewarrior5020Just shut up if it was trade who is going to exachange his immortality only to kill someone.
In Virat Yuddh, Arjuna (while being a half-man as Brihannala, due to Urvashi's curse) single handedly defeated entire kuru warriors (along with their army) all alone.
It's because Karna had Kavach kundal for his protection from death since birth.
And Bhishma had a boon that he cannot die without his own wish.
And Dronacharya being a guru of Arjun, he won't kill him.
And Ashwatthama had a stone on his forehead, thus made him kinda immortal.
And Kripacharya also 'Chiranjeevi'.
And also Duryodhan's Kavach given by Dronacharya which were as effective as Karna's Kavach, so Duryodhan won't die either.
Only Arjuna was without any boon or protection- PURE TALENT.
No arjun had everything along with him he is lord krishna
@@Ganguli1999 Shri Hari Vishnu, divided himself in two parts, i.e. Nara and Narayana.
Narayana is directly Shri Hari Vishnu, who again incarnated as Rama, Krishna, and so on.
Arjun was the incarnation of Nara, hence in a way he was part of Prabhu Hari Vishnu.
(For reference, read the story of Badrinath Dhaam)
So, you are piling up your own sins by saying such things about Arjuna..
Arjuna Shri Krishna bhagwan kaa hi NAR roop hai, Arjuna Shri Krishna kaa Mitra nahi balki unki ki praan urjaa hai jo Dwapar Yugaa me Alag alag Avatar ke roop mein prakat hue thee, jo Arjuna ko gaali deta hai wo indirectly Shri Krishna ko hi gaali de Raha hai, jaha par Arjuna ki burai hoti hai waha par Shri Krishna bhagwan KABHI NAHI aate. Magar in gadho ko kaun samjhaye.
But karna didn't used Vijaya dhanasu every time as Arjuna used gandivi danssu everytime, instead karna used his vijya bow on 17th day of kurukshetra war.
@@manjunathmeti7576 karna cannot even handle Gandiva Dhanush, it was extremely powerful, can only be handled by very powerful warrior like Arjuna. But Arjuna didn't use Gandiva in Draupadi's swayamvar where he defeated karna and other kings using simple arrows used for hitting the target 🎯
@@manjunathmeti7576main point to yahi hai
Karna ko sb villain adharmi ye sb kehte hai to koi dikkat nhi hai but
Jb uski kabiliyat ke bare me bolte hai ki nhi wo to har kisi se haar jata Arjun ke saamne kuch nhi tha
Tb wo sare point chupa lete hai jaise
Jb guru dronacharya ji ne Arjun ko wada kiya tha ki Arjun sarvshrest dhanurdhari banenge to jb ekluvya ki kushalta dekh kr dono shishya aur guru aashcharya chakit ho gye ki ye isne kaise seekha jo ki Bina guru dronacharya ki shishya ke bs unki pratima bana ke saamne self training krta tha tb unhone uska anghutha manga
Arjun ko sarvshrest dhanurdhari banane ke liye
Karna ne jb bhramastra ki Vidya seekhna caha to mana kr diya guru dronacharya ji ne bola ki abhi tum uske liye saksham nhi ho
Pr parshuram ji ne karna ko Vidya diya
jb jb karna ko mauka milta tha apni kabiliyat ko proof krne ka waha Arjun pehle hi upasthit rhte the
Isliye wo Arjun ko apna shatru maan te rhe
Draupadi ke swayamvar me karna ko mauka nhi diya gya apni kabiliyat proof krne ka aur waha pe draupadi ne bohot kuch bola tha karn ke bare me baad me Arjun swayamvar me Jeet gye uske baad se karna ke man me badle ka bhav utpan hua
Theek hai karna villain hi the manshikta se unne duryodhana ki har ek cheez me saath diya
Sb Arjun ko sarvshrest dhanurdhari bulate rehte the
Kai baar Arjun aur karna ka aamna saamna hua par Arjun bhari isiliye pade kyuki unke pass gandhiva tha har baar ye baat chupa liya jata hai
Lekin jab karna ki shiksha parshuram ji dwara hui to unhone karna ko kai Divya astro ki shiksha aur bhramastra ki shiksha aur ek dhanush bhi diya tha jo ki Vijay dhanush tha jo ki shiv ji ka dhanush hai ye dhanush jiske haath me hoga usko protect bhi karta tha aur iski accuracy force speed normal human made dhanush se jyada thi jaisa ki gandhiva ki bhi thi
Is baar jab karna arjun ke against hote hai to swayam Arjun ke pitaji jo ki indra dev hai wo unse unka kawach kundal maang lete hai
Aur mata kunti bhi swayam aa kr karna ko batati hai sari baat ki wo unhi ke purta hai wo Pandavo ke side ho le
Par ab tak bohot der ho chuki thi karna ke andar badle ki bhavna aur apna samarth dikhane ki iksha use kurukshetra ki ladai me le gyi
Is baar karna Jo ki pehle kabhi Arjun ke saman nhi the
Wo ab Arjun par bhari pad rhe the kyuki ab unke paas bhi Divya Vijay dhanush tha
Aur unko hara pana Arjun ke liye muskil ho ra tha
Fir to pata hi hoga karna ko mara kaise gya hai
Karna ko ekdum tuch bta Dene ke liye refrences bhagwat geeta se late hai
Jb bhagwat geeta Arjun aur sri krishna ke madhya hue conversation hai to usme se karna ke bare me kaha se pata chalega
Ved vyasa ji ne bs Mahabharata likhi hai jab sab ho chuka tha yudh ke baad bache the pandav aur Shri Krishna to unhone unke baare me likha aur jitna unko pata chala utna hi likha
Aur ved vyasa ji pandava aur Kauravas ke dada ji the
Karna ke bare me unhone kuch nhi likha iska matlab ye thodi hai ki karna ke bare me bakiyo ne jo likha wo galat hai
Agar yudh hua do paksho ki taraf to do POV honge na ya bs ek POV se dekhkar kisi ko kayar bol do
Paida hote hi koi mahan dhanurdhari nhi tha unko sikhaya gya aur Vidya diya gya gandhivadhari Arjun shresth the lekin parshuram ji ki shiksha aur unse yudh niti seekh kar aur vijay dhanush prapt kr karna sarvshrest dhanurdhari Bane
Jo ki wo proof nhi kar paye kyuki wo dharma ke virudh khade the aur unka yahi ant tha lekin wo Arjun ki dhanurdhari ki wajah se nhi hare wo duryodhana ke paap ke bhagidhari the isliye hare
Unke kiye punya ki wajah se to unko mrityu bhi nhi prapt ho rhi thi
Who had a better life, Arjun or Pandavas vs Karna or Kauravas?
In all 107 cousin brothers viz. 5 Pandavas, 💯 Kauravas, Karna and Yuyutsu; Duryodhana had best luxurious life, followed by rest 99 brothers and Yuyutsu.
In all 6 sons of Devi Kunti, Karna lived best luxurious lifestyle, whole life in grand city 🌆 Hastinapur 🏙️ in home 🏠 of rich and reputed father AdhiRath.
In all 5 Pandavas, Arjun 🏹 led most hard life, lived 12+ years more in forest, done more penance and fought more wars.
Karna's father AdhiRath was friend of King Dhritarashtra and Karna was friend of Duryodhana since his childhood. As Karna was 10+ years older than Duryodhana, so he used to visit regularly Duryodhana and impressed him a lot since childhood. Devi Kunti and his 5 sons, later returned to HastinaPur. This arrival was not welcomed by Duryodhana and Karna.
Karna's Lifestyle:
He was born with celestial kavach and kundalas. As long as those things were there no body can kill him. So he was always protected since childhood. Not lived with real parents but always found parenthood. He had the best education from Krupa and Drona and Parasurama. As Karna fans usually tells that he was alone - He had brothers, many wives and children, so he was not alone. He was the best friend of Prince Dhuryodhana. He used to sleep with many women. He lived a luxury lifestyle as a KING. He never went to the forest nor did nobody conspired to kill him. He never did any penance to any God except Lord Surya (of whom he did pooja - Not Tapasya), who was his father. He never went begging. He made digvijay yatra. He died in a big battle. Though he was marked as Suta he became a KING. Very fortunate fellow. Whereas Pandavas who were the rightful owners of a big empire became beggars. They had to fight at every stage of their lives, they were raised and lived most of their life in forests or exile.
this is kalyuga bro… these idiot karn fan will never think from this pov…
Arjun's tough life-- he did fight many wars but also observed his oath very faithfully :P Said to Draupadi that he will remain celibate and then got convinced by Ulupi that celibacy was only meant not copulating with Draupadi.. then enjoyed time in swag log and then again in Manipur. Arjun got weapons and good guidance. Karna tried to break mould, pretended to be brahmin and got curses. Arjun had no such issue, he also pretended to be brahmin at different points, at Draupadi swaymvar, at Jarasandh killing but no issues, no curses,. No doubt Pandav had though life but more than all the affluence of the world, they weren't deprived of love from their mother. Such a shame that "Karna used to sleep with many women" when Yudhisatr himself donated 1000 women during dice game before Draupadi :P . Duryodhan didn't do so many marriages and Yudhistar own intention for dice game was to usurp Duryodhan's kingdom. So he was no saint. But the thing which I didn't like about Karna was his cribbing. I rarely saw Pandavs for cribbing, occasional anguish at Yudhistar but then they still followed his command.
ok arjun lied being brahmin but did he aquire any knowledge by lieing as being brahmin as karna did did he hurt anyone as karna hurt parashurama by telling lie nd wat yudhishthir donated 1000 women where is it written show me the proof
@@kundankanan9074 Arjuna NEVER tried to pretend Brahmin, they became Brahmins for some time, because they were living in jungles, and they were hiding their identity from Duryodhana to find out his evil plans. To whom did Arjuna lied to??? No one, it's Karna and Duryodhana who were unable to identify Arjuna and other Pandavas in Swayamvar. And Dyut krida was already a set-up to steal Indraprastha from Pandavas, Yudhishthir was forced to play, as ordered by Dhritarashtra himself. And your info is incomplete, Yudhishthir donated both men and women, they were like staff members of Indraprastha kingdom, alongwith Indraprastha, Nothing wrong with that.
@@kundankanan9074 Arjuna NEVER tried to pretend Brahmin, they became Brahmins for some time, because they were living in jungles, and they were hiding their identity from Duryodhana to find out his evil plans. To whom did Arjuna lied to??? No one, it's Karna and Duryodhana who were unable to identify Arjuna and other Pandavas in Swayamvar. And Dyut krida was already a setup to steal Indraprastha from Pandavas, Yudhishthir was forced to play, as ordered by Dhritarashtra himself. And your info is incomplete, Yudhishthir donated both men and women, they were like staff members of Indraprastha kingdom, alongwith Indraprastha, Nothing wrong with that.
😊😊 read original Mahabharata book 😊😊in ur home... before listening 🎧 any one...my younger brother n sister of bharat 😊
Where we can listen
1. bhai, saree traditional culture hain, phele aurate ekavastra phenti thi
2. if y consider virat war, tb arjun ne khha tha ki unse ghandiv 65 saal pheli milli hain, uss hisab se abhimanyu 65+ years hona chaiye, but dikhaya jata hain 16
3. droupadi ke sirph 1 patti tha [yudhisthir] but stories ne usse paach patti bnna diya😭 , aur thi to mata kunti ne bhi dropadi ko whhi khha tha jo karn ne khha tha
4. krishn ne karn ko vrish khha tha, vrish mtlb dharmatma
5. karn ko nhhi ptta tha ti ashwasen uske dhanush mein baitha hain, uska apna arjun se pratishod tha
6. arjun subhadra ka koi love angle ye sb nhhi tha, usne jbardasti usse uthaya tha, tb krishn ne bhi arjun ko bola tha ki ye glt hain
Original vedvyas Mahabharat destroyed by 1000years ago what you said was not original
@@darkclouds6246 iss chaman agarwal bol raha iske paas vedvyaas mahabharat hai🤣🤣 iss chaman agarwal ko ye nahi pata hai ki aaj ki mahabharat uske shishya ke hai😂😂
Padhkar ayo bewkoof phir bolo bhot bezzati hui hai apke karn ki😂😂@@Abhishek-ii3ri
Karn ek negative character tha 70% but 30% positive tha jaha Tak Mai research kiya hu 4 years me
Can you tell me anything about Karn good bad anything his character and behaviour he was a great man aur not
Bhai admin agar apni okat na dikhaye to m sabit kr du Karan kya tha ... Lekin harami sala bar bar mera comment Delet kr rha h 😂😂😂
Bhai ap kisiko ek rupee Dene me das bar sochoge or ap Karn ko 70 % negative bol rahe ho.
Karna sabse bada danwir tha 🙃
Can u elaborate those 70 and 30
How cud you reach in this conclusion?
Pls clarify 70% negative
30% positive 🎉🎉
Never forget that karma never use Vijay dhanush before main war..
Dhanush chalane se skill nahi aajati
@@factsjano7178 idiot, intensity of arrow depended on the bow they were using.
Main war me bhi Krishna jee ne Arjun ko two times save Kiya tha shi se study kro@@factsjano7178
People without brain :- अर्जुन महान था, बिना पढ़े बताते हैं क्योंकि उनके साथ श्री कृष्ण थे, श्री कृष्ण द्रौपदी के लिए पांडवो के पक्ष में थे 😅😅
क्या कर्ण ने ये जानते हुए भी कि कवच और कुंडल दान में देने से वो युद्ध में मारा जा सकता है अपना कवच और कुंडल दान में नहीं दिया था इंद्र को ???? क्या श्री कृष्ण ने काई बार कर्ण के हाथो अर्जुन के प्राण नहीं बचाये????? क्या भार्गव अस्त्र से युधिष्ठिर, भीम, नकुल, शदेव और यहां तक कि अर्जुन भी भाग कर अपने शिवर में नहीं गए थे 😅😂😂😂
क्या कर्ण ने अपनी माता कुंती को वचन नहीं दिया था कि वो युधिष्ठिर, भीम, नकुल, शहदेव के प्राण नहीं लेगा , क्या अंतिम युद्ध से ठीक पहले मानसिक रूप से कामजोड़ करने के लिए श्रीकृष्ण ने नहीं बताया था कि पांडव तुम्हारे अपने भाई हैं?😂😂😂😂😂😂
Ravan v karn se pehele Mahan gyani dhanurdhari tha bijaya pakdne wala kabhi achha ni ho sakta jisne uss nari ko beshya kaha unki maa v kuch devta se bacha prapta ki thi jisi maa behen bacha pede karenge usse kabhi dharmvan nehi kehsakte
I know Arjun was the great warrior or unke jaisa koi ho hi nahi sakta 😊
Finally writters like this are coming out. Sir and Ami gantra mam.. who are well read and researched, are bursting the myths that has been created by TV.
Well researched means changing the original Mahabharata text lmao 😂
why...ami ganatra mam told mistakes??@@MTechInformationTechnology
@@HarinandS-t9c Why changing the original text ?
im askin wht r the changes she made..like to my knowledge her book served as a summary of most authentic 3 mahabharatas availably right now and its written with user friendly terminologies and explanations..was there any factual mistakes or modifications?can u pls say@@MTechInformationTechnology
@@HarinandS-t9c Their books came in later period like 1970 , Mahabharata texts existed in 1868 as Le Mahabharata, Raznama in 14th Century. Why I have to believe a agenda based organization which alters the text ?
महाभारत के युद्ध में भी कार्ण कई बार भीम और सात्यकि के जैसे योद्धाओं से हार चुका था यद्यपि कर्ण ने भी उनको हराया
kab haraya😂😂😂😂
Kai baar arjun bje hara haii
SONY-PUTRA KARNA TV SHOW ek FAKE Show hai jo sirf Karna FANS ke liye hi banaya gayaa hai, magar ismein bhi karna apne raath kaa pahiyaa uthaane mei asamarth hai, ye hai uski taakat. 😂😂😂😂😂
@@himanshudutta609 kiski baat kar rha hai -karn ne Arjun ko to nhi haraya pr karn ko sabhi ne haraya hai proof chahiye hoga to bolna me bhej dunga ,
@@himanshudutta609 karn viraatyudh aur Gandharva me pata hi kya raftaar se bhaga tha ,, aur Mahabharat me bhi Hara tha abhimanyu, satyaki, Bheem(in Archery 🤡) and Arjun se to everytime , proof chahiye hoga to respected hoke maang Lena Mera se🤗
Mahabharata is that one epic which shows every character falling ultimately prey to their own flaws.
Each and every character is responsible for his or her doom
Its reality not epic or story
Karna FANS - Karna's Kawach kundal was taken by Lord Indra Deceitfully:
No, it was a pure transaction between Karna and Lord Indra. If Lord Indra was so fond of Karna's donations, Why did Lord Indra make a condition that the 'vaisavi shakti' astra can only be used by just one time, and not many times? Because Karna demanded that astra as a substitute for kawach kundal, for which Indra denied first, but after insisting by Karna, Indra put forth his conditions of using that astra only one time.
A. If Lord Indra was so insecured about his son Arjuna, why did Lord Indra gave his 'vaisavi shakti' astra to Karna? If Indra already knew that Karna would use that 'vaisavi shakti' to kill Arjuna, then Indra would be the most STUPIDEST father in the entire Dwapar Yuga, who in spite of saving his son, giving the power to his son's enemy. Obviously it was NOT any 'aashirvaad' by Indra.
Karna Fans & TV shows:
•Indra ask Karna to give his kawach kundal as a donation.
•Karna gave those kawach kundal to Indra.
•Indra impressed and by his own wish gave Karna - vaisavi shakti.
"How stupid Indra was - to give a deadly weapon so that Karna would kill his son Arjuna." - Sarcastically speaking
Here's how it happened:
•Indra ask Karna to give his kawach kundal as a donation.
•Karna rejected first, and then ask for a favor in return - vaisavi shakti.
•Indra rejected that offer first - he knew Karna would use that weapon against Arjuna.
•Karna also refused to donate his kawach kundal to Indra.
•Indra then make a deal to use that vaisavi shakti astra only one time, after that it will return to Indra.
•Karna agreed to that deal and gave his kawach kundal to Indra.
B. If Lord Indra was so insecured about his son Arjuna, why didn't Lord Indra gave those kawach kundal to Arjuna afterwards? - it's because Indra wasn't worried about his son Arjuna, he just wanted to remove those protection from Karna, so that Karna would die.
"Indra dev ko iss baat ki chinta nahin thi ki Arjuna ko kaise bachayenge, balki iss baat ki chinta thi ki karna ko kaise maarenge, Indra dev ko Arjuna ki shakti aur saamarthya pe pura bharosa hai"
C. If Lord Indra was so insecured about his son Arjuna, Didn't Lord Indra gave any counter weapon of vaisavi shakti to Arjuna? Yes he did. Indra gave Arjuna his most powerful weapons - Vajra and Aindrastra.
Vaisavi shakti could kill only one person but Vajra could kill thousands of demons at a time.
-----------------------------------------------
Even with the 'Vaishvi shakti' weapon of Karna, he couldn't able to kill Arjuna as Arjuna had the knowledge of Lord Shiva's weapons which could easily nullify the effects of 'Vaishvi shakti' weapon.(It is stupid to think that Indra's weapons are stronger than Lord Shiva's weapons)
•Raudrastra :
This weapon was used by Arjuna to kill fourteen thousand kalakeya demons.
•Pashupatastra :
Lord Shiva granted this weapon to Arjuna after testing his valour. This is the most powerful weapon of Shiva. Invoking Pashupatastra is highly against the warfare as it is capable of destroying the universe. Arjuna never used it.
•Maheshwarastra :
It is said to contain the power of Lord Shiva's third eye and it's capable of killing immortal gods. Arjuna also had the knowledge of Pashupatastra of lower version which he received from Indra.
----------------------------------------------------------
If Arjuna has to CHEAT, to kill Karna, he would have done it much earlier and with ease. As Arjuna had ‘Sammohan Astra', - which makes the enemy to either sit on the chariots, leaving all his weapons keep aside, or hallucinated or fainted. After that Arjuna can kill the enemy easily. He could use that weapon in Mahabharata war, to kill all his opponents easily, but he didn't, as it's an unfair means to fight a war. In Virat yuddh, he used this weapon merely to stop fight. He didn't kill any big warrior afterward - like Bheeshma, Drona, Kripa, Karan, Ashwatthama, Duryodhan etc. He could have killed Karna there and then. And if you say that Karna had kawach kundal, he won't die, then Arjuna could have forcefully taken his kawach kundal from his body, as Karna was hallucinated or fainted. But instead, Arjuna spared all those lives, including the life of Duryodhan and Dusshasana, which showed Arjuna always stood by the side of Dharma and Truth.
---------------------------------------
I wonder how anybody got a boon as kawach kundal since birth. It's obvious that those kawach kundal belong to the Indra loka. So how did Karna got it since birth?
Because everyone else in all the 4 yugas, who got some kind of boon either by doing some hard penance to the Gods, or some good deeds. So How did Karna got Kawach kundal since birth? It means he was extremely lucky to get it free of cost, OR he did a penance to the Lord Surya on his previous life when he was a deamon named Sahasrakavacha, who got 1000 Kawach kundal, out of which 999 were destroyed by Nara and Narayan (Arjuna and Krishna).
Well defined and thank you for good information ❤🎉
@@Vikram_jha-hj1up 👍
@poorimail8292
And this time when Surya Dev come and said to karna Indra dev is coming to take your kavach kundal . So don't give you and that movement karna if kavach kundal is not still I defeat Arjun because my I learn from Guru Dron and parashuram.. and still people said Dronacharya never tech karna
Bhai iska answer toh abhi bhi ni dia tune ki indra aaya hi kyu karn k kawach lene
20:00 for Those who came from reel
1. bhai, saree traditional culture hain, phele aurate ekavastra phenti thi
2. if y consider virat war, tb arjun ne khha tha ki unse ghandiv 65 saal pheli milli hain, uss hisab se abhimanyu 65+ years hona chaiye, but dikhaya jata hain 16
3. droupadi ke sirph 1 patti tha [yudhisthir] but stories ne usse paach patti bnna diya😭 , aur thi to mata kunti ne bhi dropadi ko whhi khha tha jo karn ne khha tha
4. krishn ne karn ko vrish khha tha, vrish mtlb dharmatma
5. karn ko nhhi ptta tha ti ashwasen uske dhanush mein baitha hain, uska apna arjun se pratishod tha
6. arjun subhadra ka koi love angle ye sb nhhi tha, usne jbardasti usse uthaya tha, tb krishn ne bhi arjun ko bola tha ki ye glt hain
Karn was engulfed in jealousy. He was an opportunist. His only intention of being with Duryodhan was to stand against Arjun (indeed the greatest archer), defeat him and earn the title of being the best archer of all times. He was infected with an inferiority complex and always thought of overcoming it by defeating someone greater in prowess. He was not a warrior, he was definitely not brave.
not in original mahabharatha, but only in your fantasies.
@@ringostarr1038first you need to read original mb before telling others.
@@ringostarr1038 The Writing is On The Wall Brother.. don't have to be an expert.
@@tusharranjan1054 o.o stop tryin to fib, no one except zoomers believe you can change reality because you believe. Boi, Krishna had to teach something & Bhisma, Drona & Karna were arche types to show how good people support Adharma. Something which you foos o.o forgot lol
Arjuna was more jealous person
Sony putra karn tv serial wala nahi manenge 😢😢
Unlog ki chale.. Toh Woh Karn ko Bhagwan Shri Krishna se bhi upar rakh dein 😂😂
Adhe comment mein... Bhagvan Karn Likha hota hai.. Chamche, Shaitan ke bachon ka 😂😂
Sony putra😂😂😂😂
Wo chaye tih mahabharat ko hamari mahabharat बना देगे😅
😂😂😂
Karn was the biggest Villian of Mahabharat. But today's illetrate people trying hard to make him a hero. Shameless thing😢
Your name is saying it all , keep crying womp womp 😂
@@abirpandey7339 ole ole 😂😂
Karn ke itne adharm ginwa dunga puchh mat. Now you keep crying womp womp😂😂
@@KrishnaXArjunAbe Arjun fan boy ki fatiii padi h karn k Arjun se kahi adhik bhakt h isliye 😂
@@akhil_Khatrii ghanta fategi meri 😂😂. Karn ki fati rehti thi isliye bhaag jaata tha 😂😂
@@KrishnaXArjun haha very funny kiske pass kavach kundal ho vijay dhanush ho physically itni strength ho ki jarasandh ko ek din me hrade vo bhagega drr ke😂😂😂😂😂
MISLEADING VIEWS -
If Karna was evil then why would he donate his kavach and kundal?
If Karna was evil then why would he reject the offer of Krsna of being crowned the King of World?
If Karna was evil then why would he battle on the loosing side despite knowing the consequence?
If Karna was evil then why would he let go other pandavas and let them despite having the chance to kill them?
You must donated brain 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@divyapatil2420
Don't attack me personally.
Be fair and objectively answer my questions.
@@vsmart9 your questions doesn't make any sense,
If you want ans then go and listen to podcast or read vee vyas mahabharat
And still you don't get your ans then you are truly an brainless person who just want controversies
@@divyapatil2420
I have read everything multiple times from authentic sources much better than this Ami Gantra. And therefore you need to give objective and logical answers don't do hasty generalisations because that only shows your lack of understanding and your bias.
Daanveer Karna commited sins but that does not mean he is evil. He realised and repeneted for his sins and subsequently paid the price for it.
@vsmart9 And after reading it multiple times you still have doubts??
It's impossible to read mahabharat multiple times It's not episode that you watch multiple times !! 🤣🤣
And if you don't get it then it's not for you!!
Bhagwan ne bhi bhagwat gita Arjun ko batayi thi , brainless and darpok karn ko nahi !! So it's not for everyone to be true !!
So move on !! Or go cry about your questions !!
Aur bura lag raha ho toh thodi der sonyputra dekha lo !! Wahi se gyan liya hai na !!!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Karn nhi Jeet saka aur bhag gye, us waqt ye mahashay wahi the Karn apna chappal chhod ke bhaga tha ye mahashay chappal leke Karn ke piche piche bhaga 😂😂
Ha star plus kid jo thahare
Karna ke peeche Arjuna lath le ke bhaagaa thaa......Arjuna ne Karna se kaha, bhaag komdhike Aandhi aayi....😆😆😆😆
Kbhi source text k baare m suna h?
@@thethreespikes9737 kisi ne nhi suna bs tu hi suna h aur sirf sun ke hi suna rha to no words for you just r.i.p. aur padha v h to book ka naam writer ka naam page no bta de
If Arjuna has to cheat, to kill Karna, he would have done it earlier and with ease. As Arjuna had ‘Sammohan Astra', - which makes the enemy to either sit on the chariots, leaving all his weapons keep aside, or hallucinated or fainted. After that Arjuna can kill the enemy easily. He could use that weapon in Mahabharata war, to kill all his opponents easily, but he didn't, as it's an unfair means to fight a war. In Virat yuddh, he used this weapon merely to stop fight. He didn't kill any big warrior afterward - like Bheeshma, Drona, Kripa, Karan, Ashwatthama, Duryodhan etc. He could have killed Karna there and then. And if you say that Karna had kawach kundal, he won't die, then Arjuna could have forcefully taken his kawach kundal from his body, as Karna was hallucinated or fainted. But instead, Arjuna spared all those lives, including the life of Duryodhan and Dusshasana, which showed Arjuna always stood by the side of Dharma and Truth.
I wonder how anybody got a boon as kawach kundal since birth. It's obvious that those kawach kundal belong to the Indra loka. So how did Karna got it since birth?
Because everyone else in all the 4 yugas, who got some kind of boon either by doing some hard penance to the Gods, or some good deeds. So How did Karna got Kawach kundal since birth? It means he was extremely lucky to get it free of cost, OR he did a penance to the Lord Surya on his previous life when he was a deamon named Dambhodabhava, who got 1000 Kawach kundal, out of which 999 were destroyed by Nara and Narayan (Arjuna and Krishna).
कर्ण तो फिर भी कर्ण ही था..।
1. कवच का दान भी झूठ था।
2. चार पांडवों को अभयदान झूठ था।
3. कृष्ण के प्रस्ताव को ठुकराना झूठ था।
सूर्यपुत्र और विजयधनुष को धारण करने वाले योद्धा कों यूँ ही कुछ भी बोल दो...क्या हीं जाता हैं।
Mahabharat greatest character -legendry karna ❤❤
😂 भाई क्यों इतना दिल पे लेते हो।
कर्ण कैसा भी हो पर वास्तव में था तो दुर्योधन के ही साथ।
जो भी कृष्ण के विरुद्ध जायेगा वो चाहे कितना भी महान क्यों न हो उसका पतन तय है।
What an Amazing episode, so much unknown stories about Mahabharata.
Thank you so much for bringing such good content
Jai Shree Ram 🙏
Jai Shree Ram! 😄
OOO Bhai c...... Bna rhaye hain
Ye 2 take ka baniya fake gyan de raha
Bhai yeh toh socho ki jaha shree krishan rehnte honge jin logo ne unhe dekha hogaa woh kitneeee khushnaseeb hogeee
It is not possible in Kalyug. Shri Krishna was there in Dvapar Yug
@@niranjanchavan2325
bhai main pakistan se hun aur mujy hindusim bohat acha lagta hai . kiya ap mujy hindusim ke bare btaaa sakty hai ?
@Ahsankhan-cc9ie bhai hinduism ke baare mein koi kuch nahi Bata sakta yeh bohot jyada deep hai agar aap aur main apni puri zindagi bhi laga denge toh bhi sab kuch nahi jaan pyenge aap koh jis cheez ki zaroorat hai woh janlo aur chordo, like agar peace of mind aur self knowledge chaiye toh upnishad padlo aur agar kisi aur field ki knowledge chahiye toh usse related scriptures padhlo,love from India🙏❤️🇮🇳
As you can see the pet dogs of Sonyputra Corona has started barking and defending their father as expected 😂
Or tu kon hea ohh pehechan gaya.
Sirf name ke sanatani and a starplus putra arjun fan
अर्जुन सबसे श्रेष्ठ योद्धा था तत्काल समय का उसके सामने क्या कोई भी योद्धा टिक नहीं सकता था।दूसरी बात कृष्ण की परम कृपा पांडवो के ऊपर थी यही वजह थी कि महाभारत युद्ध में पांडवो विजय हुई.
Esa mat karo bro Star Plus Wale karn me fans bhadak jayenge 😂
Aur puch baap wale v😂😂
Vagawan Krishna saved dharma, however, Karna fulfilled his duties and responsibilities honestly. That's why Vagawan Krishna was always happy about his struggles and daan. Destiny favors the dharma. So, Arjun lived and Karna took all the evils and sins along with the Kaurab brothers and Adharma sides by accepting death (badh). Therefore, we cannot compare God (Vagawan Krishna) with God's child (Karna). Whoever agrees with my concept please hit like...Thank you.
Only in tv serials in reality Krishna ji ne karn vadh se phle kya bola h uske liy pdh le jake ek bar
Ebein hi karn ko hero banadetehe
I always knew draupadi never goes wrong, because she is krishna🙏🕉❤
🙏☺️ She is Krishna Bhakt,Dharm gyani (dnyani)
@@nitindange7569she is also krishna
There are three characters in Mahabharata whose name was krishna
First is lord himself lord Krishna
2nd is arjun who is also known as krishna
3rd is draupadi
All three are called krishna many times in Mahabharata
@strager ji 🙏☺️ Dhanyawad 👍
@@nitindange7569 🙏🙏
@@nitindange7569 are bhai krishn ji behen he Isiliye droupadi ji ka ek naam krishna he, mene krishn thodi bola
If the karna was bad character then shri krishna had no need to use a tricks to kill him. He was such a great warriors and quite better then arjun. Just because he was in wrong side we can't consider him negative character 🙏
Arjuna❤️❤️❤️❤️👑👑👑👑
fattu arjun fanboy 😂
@@-ob1vxfattu to karn tha arjun ko dekhke kutte ki tarah bhagta tha virat yudh ho ya fir dropdi swayamvar yudh ho ya 14th day ka kurukshetra ka yudh ho 😂
Karn ne yudh se palayan kiya? Shri krishna ne bhi kiya tha. Unhein bhi bologe? Arjun bahut veer tha. Nihathe karn ko maara. Ye veerta hai 👌🏼
@nishantrana3994 हाँ तो कर्ण विष्णु अवतार नहीं था। तेरे मेरे जैसा था। लड़ाई में बहुत कुछ होता है। याँ तो सबको भगौड़ा कहो। याँ सबको वही सम्मान दो। ये क्या बात की एक भाग गया एक ने लीला करी। श्री कृष्ण ने सदा आम आदमी जैसा व्यवहार किया। कालयवन को मारना था तो वे ले गए।
@@b8bb8r agar karn tere mere jesa hai toh bhagwan se kyu compare kr rha , aukat meh rahe , adharmi ko bhagwan se compare kr rha lol.
@@Paradox17AB औक़ात? जिस भगवान की तू बात कर रहा है, उन्हीं ने कर्ण को अर्जुन से अधिक माना था। टीवी सीरियल में मत देखना, महाभारत में पढ़ना। अधर्मी नहीं था वो कृतज्ञ था। आजकल वालों जैसा नहीं कि लाभ मिले तो बाप बदल लें मित्र क्या बड़ी चीज़ है।
@@b8bb8r arey bas kr , karn ka chamcha
People should not trust on only this type of human’s story. As I found every other person just came and trying to portrait KARAN as a villain.so please Just go and read original Mahabharata written by ved vyasji. If you want know true story about any character of Mahabharata.
Wo padh k hi aye hain yahan😂
Orr tu Ekta kapoor ka fan karn ko baap maankar baitha hai.
KARN was a Villain and as evil as Duryodhan
Parr le bhai tu bhi jake😂😂
Raja Parikshit ka ego nahin tha. Is 7 din mein unhone Srimad Bhagvat puran ka sravan kiya tha. Wo bhi Suk muni ji se jo ki apne janm ke turant baad hi adrishya ho gaye the. Us samay yeh bohot badi ghatna thi. Phir apne karm ke phal se mila abhisaap ko accept karna ek satyabadi raja ka dharm bhi hota hai. Isiliye woh mahan hain. Phir unko moksh mila. Agar deha tyagne se pehle unka ego rehta toh moksh milna asambhav tha.
Excellent informative discussion, i appreciate
Aaj kal सोशल मीडिया पर बहुत सारे ved vayas,Tulsi dass पैदा हो गए है।हर कोई ज्ञान देने लगा है।
Spiritual episodes are best category. But within Spiritual personages, try to discriminate between those give out book knowledge and those who have actually done Sadhana in caves or cremation grounds.
That’s a well put point although this is not really a spiritual episode technically speaking, this is a scripture/history based episode… where we are just trying to find out what really happened in Mahabharat. 😄
अच्छा आप लोगों को हिंदी भी आती है😮
Are a koi tere school college ke mangadant bakwas kitab nahi ha a sastra praman ha jo satya ha aur maharshi ved vyas dwara dekh ke likha gaya ha jo bhagwan Krishna ke hi sabd ha. Hare Krishna Hari bol 👍🙏😀
@@AwaaraMusaafirश्लोक 4.14 copy
न मां कर्माणि लिम्पन्ति न मे कर्मफले स्पृहा ।
इति मां योऽभिजानाति कर्मभिर्न स बध्यते ॥ १४ ॥
शब्दार्थ
न-कभी नहीं; माम्-मुझको; कर्माणि-सभी प्रकार के कर्म; लिम्पन्ति-प्रभावित करते हैं; न-नहीं; मे-मेरी; कर्म-फले-सकाम कर्म में; स्पृहा-महत्त्वाकांक्षा; इति-इस प्रकार; माम्-मुझको; य:-जो; अभिजानाति-जानता है; कर्मभि:-ऐसे कर्म के फल से; न-कभी नहीं; स:-वह; बध्यते-बँध पाता है ।.
अनुवाद
play_arrowpause मुझ पर किसी कर्म का प्रभाव नहीं पड़ता, न ही मैं कर्मफल की कामना करता हूँ। जो मेरे सम्बन्ध में इस सत्य को जानता है, वह भी कर्मों के फल के पाश में नहीं बँधता।
@@AwaaraMusaafir श्लोक 7.15 copy
न मां दुष्कृतिनो मूढा: प्रपद्यन्ते नराधमा: ।
माययापहृतज्ञाना आसुरं भावमाश्रिता: ॥ १५ ॥
शब्दार्थ
न-नहीं; माम्-मेरी; दुष्कृतिन:-दुष्ट; मूढा:-मूर्ख; प्रपद्यन्ते-शरण ग्रहण करते हैं; नर-अधमा:-मनुष्यों में अधम; मायया-माया के द्वारा; अपहृत-चुराये गये; ज्ञाना:-ज्ञान वाले; आसुरम्-आसुरी; भावम्-प्रकृति या स्वभाव को; आश्रिता:-स्वीकार किये हुए ।.
अनुवाद
play_arrowpause जो निपट मूर्ख हैं, जो मनुष्यों में अधम हैं, जिनका ज्ञान माया द्वारा हर लिया गया है तथा जो असुरों की नास्तिक प्रकृति को धारण करने वाले हैं, ऐसे दुष्ट मेरी शरण ग्रहण नहीं करते।
Feels good supporting this channel!
The problem is that this person sitting in the studio is telling wrong things about Karna, the best warrior of Mahabharata, in reality Karna was a very great personality.Karna is not a villain, he knew that he had chosen the wrong side for the Mahabharata war.
Which Mahabharata do u read
Abe chaddi Mahabharat Padi Hai Kya ? Ullo ka patha
Serial thoda kam dekha karo
sony se mahabharat mat dekha karo
Mahabharat karna never ran away from arjuna. He had the kavach and no one could defeat him and when he had no kavach arjuna killed him by deceit when he was lifting his carriage wheel. He was the most powerful and the best.
Sirf ye banda sach jantahe... Or aj tak jitna v gita... Mahabharat... Me likha he woh sab jhut.... I love karna and no one can change my opinion❤❤
ek bar Jake padh bhi le 😂
@@parmarvipul5166 pehle ap ... Pariye
@@parmarvipul5166rehn de bhai uska opinion badal jaayega
Sach sunne ka gooda nhi uski gaand me😅
Ye to achi baat h aapka opinion badle bhi n main bhi yahi chahta hu, tabhi to ghor kalyug aayega jb adarmiyon ko idol bnaya jayega. Main to chahta hu log karn or ravan ko aur pyar karein taki adharm badhe kalyug badhe or sabka vinaash ho. Ye bhi jruri h
Agar tune mahabharat pari hai tu tune ye nhi pra kya ki karn ko bheem ne 3- 4 bar buri tareeke se hraya tha@@surajitmog1021
Idk why and how but I'll always love and choose karna over Arjun anytime
Arjun the greatest warrior❤❤❤
💯 shi
Right
Noooo....
Karn is great ❤
*@user-cv7ln2do6b* Karna doesn't exist anymore. He was great in doing Adharma, not in doing the right things. So there is nothing praiseworthy about Karna. Arjuna was the greatest character in the Mahabharata.
Karn adharmi tha, dharm pe hota toh Draupadi vastra haran kabhi hone nahi deta, ya toh mar jata ya Mita deta
Your mom is also great
Iravati Karve's book Yuganta is a must for every Mahabharat enthusiast.
Bori Mahabharata critical edition original scriptures padho
faltu hain wo 😂😂😂😂😂adha jhoot Maine pada hain sage Ved vyas aur Kmg version best Hain along with Iravati's karve.@@wolfeinstine6677
@@wolfeinstine6677but original scripture destroyed by 1000 years ago 😂😂😂
@@darkclouds6246 true but these scriptures older than the one you read.
आस्तिक सर्प ने एक संस्कृत में मंत्र भी दिया था और कहा था कि यदि कोई सर्प को देखकर इस मंत्र का उच्चारण करता है तो वह सिर्प उस व्यक्ति को नहीं कटेगा । यह भी महाभारत में लिखा हुआ है यह भी महाभारत में लिखा हुआ है।
9.30 super.
Karn ke barey main sahi kaha
Droupadi is heroine
Aaj Kal Jisko dekho Sanatan Par Gyan Batne Chala Aata Hai Jinka Khud Ka Gyan Hai Hi Nahi News Chanal Ki Trah Kisi Ko Bula Kar Debet Suru Kar Deta HAi
Wonderful interaction 😊. Loved the book but thse conversation ignite a deeper thought process that enriches our next round of reading the Mahabharata.
The thing is Karna(my hero) stop learning anything after staying with Duryadhona while Arjun kept learning all the skills including Deva Shastra even during the exile,thats why he knows more about the art of war
wahi log karna ke fan he jo tv serial ko dekh ke prabhavit hue he 😂
Fan to dev indra bhi the tabhi to kavach kundal kiraye se lene aye the😂
@@gol309How stupid Indra was - to save his son, he gave a deadly weapon so that Karna would kill his son Arjuna." ??- Sarcastically speaking. (Obviously it's a TRANSACTION, NOT ANY CHARITY)
@@gol309By the way - those kawach kundal belong to Indra Lokaa, of which Indra dev was the rightful owner.
*According to TV serials*
"KARN was the greatest warrior and killed in unfair way by Arjun 😂
*But according to Mahabharat scripture*
"KARN was as evil as Duryodhan and killed by Arjun in fair battle"
Oh really kid... Arjun fan boy😂
Mfff fair battle.... Jishka baap ne karn se kabash kundal sin liya or nihotha ko baan mara, ismein konsa fair hein..
@@NAYANJYOTI9988karn bhi mara tha abhimanyu ko wese....tit for tat
@@akhil_Khatriioh really corona fan boy
@@vibekpradhan3494sahi kaha lekin yaha karn aur Arjun ki baath chal rahi h tho abhimanyu kaha se agaya bich m ... aur karn tho adharmi tha hi lekin merko samjh nhi atha ye Arjun ke piche itne pagal kyo h jo vyakti apni patni ki raksha na kare aur waha mojud hokar bhi shant rahe usko log pasand kar rahe waah
जिसनें अपनी कवच कुंडल दान कर दिया
कुंती अपनी माँ और पांडव उसकी भाई
ये जानने के वाबजूद भी
जिसे दुर्योधन का साथ नहीं छोड़ा
कृष्ण भगवान है ये बात कर्ण को पता था
फिर भी उसने युद्ध करना नहीं छोड़ा
और तुम लोग कह रहे हो
की गंधर्ब के सामने अपनी मित्र को
संकट में छोड़ कर कर्ण भाग गया था 🤦♀️
But this is true bro karna is defeated by gandharva
Plz Mahabharata me likha h karna ne ladkia v offer ki thi ar jb tk kawch k badle kuch na Miley tb tk kawach nhi Diya tha mahabhart padho❤
@@AryanRaj-hi9wz महाभारत में लिखने से कुछ नहीं होता रहस्य को समझो
महाभारत तो ये भी लिखा है
की बर्बरिक जल्दी हीं युद्ध खत्म कर देता
जबकि वो बकवास था
भीष्म , अश्वथमा, जयद्रथ जैसे महाबली की
वरदानी शक्ति को झूठा बना कर
क्या बर्बरिक युद्ध खत्म कर देता
Logic को समझो लिखने से कुछ नहीं होता
If you don't believe, you can read authentic Mahabharat written by Vedvyas.
Karan k fans chinta mat lo inhone bola h karn ek band se arjun ki mrityu nischit thi agar krishna ji rath ko niche nhi karte toh arjun defeat nhi hota balki mar hi jata m isliye kehta hu karn acha tha par jabhi usne arjun ko harana cha jab jab usse bacha liya krishna ji n
Cheating se aroww me karn ne takshak nag ko bithaya tha. Jisko Arjun ne nahi dekha arow destroy hone baad bhi takshak arjun pe kud pada tha
महाभारत पढ पर सीरीयल मत देखना❤
IF KARNA WAS TRULY A VILLAIN, HE WOULD HAVE TAKEN THE OFFER KRISHNA GAVE TO HIM - Krishna told him, he was the eldest Pandava & if he switched sides, he would be made the emperor instead of Yudhistra & also would marry Draupadhi as the eldest Pandava. Karna rejected this, showing he was a man of character & how even good people support adharma, due to their goodness.
He realised his sins in the end and that doesn't make him good anyway. Dumb people like you have no sense of judgement
What a STUPID LOGIC you have:
Nah!! Not at all. No, Karna had no dilemma at all regarding friendship. He would always choose Duryodhan over Krishna, as he already did. Denying Krishna was not a hard choice for him, as he was already a KING.
Well it's easy for Karna to reject Krishna’s offers, as he was already a KING of Anga Desh. Besides that, Duryodhan, his besties, has biggest Empires, including Pandavas’s Indraprastha. So there is not much left to gain if he choose Pandavas side. Pandavas didn't have their own kingdom to live. Also, if Kauravas would have won the Mahabharata war, everything else would be under Prince Duryodhan’s empire. So, for KING Karna it wasn't a good deal, he won't sacrifice all those luxuries just for the sake of 'Dharma'. Also, he didn't consider Krishna as a Supreme God, but more as a Pandavas’s mentor. It's easy for him to choose the side of luxury lifestyle, which he already had, than the side of Dharma and Truth.
In terms of moral ethics and virtues, any kind of friendship cannot be considered as greater than Dharma and truth.
Krishna-Arjun friendship teaches us the true value of dharma - how to live one's life in a fair manner towards the path of Dharma. Whereas Karna- Duryodhan friendship was the usual, normal friendship, which DOESN'T TEACH ANYTHING. If Karna accepted Duryodhan's friendship, it was his choice, if he was in a dilemma that means he had no clarity and wisdom regarding dharma. Duryodhan made Karna a King, there was no sacrifice. Whereas Arjun rejected Krishna's Narayani Sena for Krishna - True friendship.
Dharma is always greater than any friendship.
@@Red-Hood12 o.o Like I said, u r a fine SPECIMEN. Your zoomr world is not the same as real world, come bac brihenlala lova
@@Red-Hood12 o.o we know your heart is with BRIHENLALA. You are fida, but let's get back to facts. Since Mahabharatha is actually deep, not like your family story. Stop trying to put your ORDINARY MANUSH spin to this deep saga. o.o We have no time for ur excremnt
@@Red-Hood12 Karna-Duryodhana friendship TEACHES intelligent people, NOT o.o foos like u. This is your problem, not ours. There is no cure for ur low intellect.
Duryodhana helped Karna when no one else did. But the way Karna had to return it was by shepherding Duryodhana in the right path. At least, he could have saved his life by NOT supporting him in war.
This is what Mahabharatha teaches via Karna-Duryodhana saga.
o.o what we learnt from this? You people can only learn if we bring our SLIPPER into equation. It is what u are
जिसके बाण ने कृष्णा और बजरंग का रथ को दो कदम पीछे धकेल दिया था जिसने अपना कवच कुंडल दान में दे दिया पांच पांडवों की जान भीख मे दे दिया वो करण भागे गए 😂😂
Ye dekho ekta kapoor ka product 😂😂😂😂
Ye jo tune bola hai ye kahi bhi Mahabharat me nhi likha . Tony putra corona fan 🙈😭
@@Mr1tyunjay are bkl germen syphed Wale Jake phle Geeta pd
@@Samurai-xj9kfpehle tu padh Jaa ke
Vedvyas ki mahabharat me Geeta aati hai , uncle between ye sab original mahabharat book me nahi hai ?🤡?@@Samurai-xj9kf
I think he is so smart that's why he makes Google look like a homework buddy 🤣
Abhinav Agrawal ji and Jayesh Gangan ji KO Naman . Very Rational and Marvellous Narrative. Thanks.
Thank you! 🙏🏻
Some people are giving the argument that, if Arjun is more powerful than Karna then why Indra took his Kavach.
People need to understand the simple fact that, nobody could kill Karna because of that Kavach, but he could be defeated. Defeat and death are two different things.
Karna lost against Drupad, Chitrasen defeated Karna in Gandhrva war and Karna fled from the war, Bheem defeated Karna when Bheem went to Anga desh for Ashwamedh yagna, Whole Kuru army along with Karna got defeated by Arjun alone.
Apart from the separation of Kunti, his whole life was way more happier and privileged than Pandavas.
Serial lovers should at least cross check the details.
One more thing , everyone who had any kind of divine weapons or power they achieved either with education or tapasya , and upon death everything was taken from them . Karna was the only who got protection right from birth which was injustice towards other warriors that’s why Indra takes it and calls out Sun God for his discrimination
@@anandshroff5398 Absolutely, but some people won't see this.
।।।।कोई नही समझेंगा भाई!
अब महाभारत दो हिस्सो मे बट गई है- एक अर्जुन और दूसरा कर्ण। इन दोनो के अलावा लोगो के पास महाभारत में कोई चर्चा का विषय ही नही है।
महाभारत में ययाति चरित्र आता है, जो की एक बहुत अच्छा चर्चा का विषय हो सकता है। पर लोग बात करते नही।
महाभारत में कुरुक्षेत्र के युद्ध के बाद पितामह भीष्म और युधिष्ठिर के संवाद में बहुत सी ज्ञान की बाते है, पर कोई चर्चा नहीं करता।
महाभारत में भागवत गीता है, अनु गीता है, काम गीता है, इतने सारे टॉपिक है पर अर्जुन कर्ण के अलावा कुछ लोगो को चर्चा करने का इंटरेस्ट ही नही है।
जब सच बताए तो इन्हे लगता है की कर्ण की बुराई कर रहे है। अब सीरियल्स ने कर्ण को हीरो देखा दिया है इसी कारण इनके मन में कर्ण को लेकर अलग ही इमेज बन गई है, जिस कारण कितना भी सच बोल दो इंच कर्ण को ही सपोर्ट करना होता है।
जिसने कृष्ण को नही चुना उसे भला कोन फैन हो सकता है। इसमें कोई संदेह नहीं को कर्ण एक अच्छा योद्धा था पर अर्जुन तो अर्जुन ही था।
इन्हे लगता है की इतिहास जितने वाले लिखते है। अगर दुर्योधन जीता होता तो बात कुछ और होती। कुछ भी बिना सिर पैर की बाते करते है।
@@jaymahajan1695 ekdam sahi kaha bhai, Mahabharat mein bohot si aysi cheez hai jo hume sikhna chahiye. Gita ka gyan, Yudhishir ka Bhisma pitamah se gyan lena, Vidur niti, Kurukshetra se pehle ka shanti samjhote ka prayas... In sabhi cheez bohot important hai.
Vedvyas ne Karna ko Shakuni se bhi bura bataya hai, woh ek adharmi tha jo bachpan me Bheem ko zaher deke marne mei shamil tha, lakshyagraha ke plan mei shamil tha, hamesha se Arjun se jalta raha, Draupadi ko veshya keh ke apman kiya, virat yudh ke pehe Kripacharya and Dronacharya ko apman kiya, Madra desh ke raja Shalya ke samne Madra desh ki mahilayon ko apman kiya, Parshuram se jhoot bolke divyastra sikhne ki kosish kiya, aur bhi bohot kuch.
Liberals ne apne matlab keliye Karna ko hero banaya hai.
@@pramitkhan7729 ये बात आपने सही कही है।
पर यही बात कोई किसी पॉडकास्ट में बोले तो लोगो को बुरा लग जाता है।
महाभारत मुझे बहुत पसंद है, महाभारत की चर्चा करना उससे भी ज्यादा पसंद है, पर बस एक ये पागलपंती के कारण की लोग महाभारत पड़ने के बाद भी कर्ण को पसंद कर ही कैसे सकते है, मुझे महाभारत की चर्चा करना अच्छा नहीं लगता।
😂वैसे भी भगवान खुद कहते है की नास्तिको और जो मेरी लीलाओं को न समझ सके उससे कभी मेरी लीलाओं का वर्णन करना भी नही चाहिए।
अर्जुन जैसा धनुर्धर कोई है ही नही।
खुद भीष्म, द्रोणाचार्य और अश्वथामा भी अर्जुन को अजय मानते थे।
😂पर कर्ण भक्तों की बुद्धि भी कर्ण और दुर्योधन जैसे ही है जो उन्हें लगता है की भीष्म और द्रोण पूरी ताकत से अर्जुन के साथ युद्ध नही कर रहे है, जब की ये झूठ है।
अर्जुन हर एक दिव्यास्त्र का तोड़ जनता था। जो द्रोणाचार्य जानते थे, वो तो अर्जुन भी जनता था। अर्जुन ने सब कुछ सीख लिया था, यही कारण था कि द्रोणाचार्य अर्जुन को अजय मानते था। 😂क्युकी ऐसा कोई परीक्षा ही नही थी जिसे पार करना अर्जुन ना जनता हो।।।।।।।।।
Yudhistir said these words when arjun ran away from karna in fear of bhargavastar
Source: Bori CE Chapter 1198(48)
. O Partha! Keshava drives you. How have you withdrawn as a result of your fear of Karna? O evil-souled one! Had you given the bow to Keshava and become his charioteer in the battle, then Keshava would have slain the fierce Karna, like the lord of the Maruts 593 bringing down Vritra with his vajra. It would have been better had you not been born in Pritha's womb, but had been aborted in the fifth month itself. O prince! O evil-souled one! That would have been better than withdrawing from the field of battle."
Karn ❤❤
Karna was the most negative person in Mahabharata... that was natural as he didn't get what he expected...
I love karn
@@s.psumankumar715Because it is kali yoga.
Karn never defeated arjuna but ..arjuna defeated karn many times
Without a hint of doubt Karn was inferior to Bhisma, Arjun, Drone & Satyaki.
Listen, ami ganatra podcast ....she clears almost every confusion
No matter what people say if Shree Hari himself praised Karn and had a respect for him that means he truly deserved everyone's respect
Hari na to duryodhana ko bhi praise Kiya h
@@xxtoxicxx5139 Duryodhan ko sarcastically praise kiya hai lekin Karn ko sach mein kiya tha
@@gigachad9898 Virat yudh mai kisna pura kauravo ko haraya tha
@@xxtoxicxx5139 mai yeh nahi keh raha ki Karn hi sarwashrest tha wahi sabse mahan tha mai bas yeh keh raha hu ki Karn nafrat karne layak bhi nahi tha. Aur yeh bachcho ki tarah yeh mahan ki kam mahan yeh sab karke koi fayeda nahi Karn ko aise hi danveer Karn nahi kaha jaata aur haan mai yeh bhi janta hu ki Pandavo ke pass dharm tha nahi toh Shree Krishna unki orr se kyu the
@@gigachad9898 vo ha kisi Stree ko vaishya khana koi accha gun nahi h
Uncle karna ke bare main kuch bura maat bolna achi baat nehi hai sir ❤ legend hai karna
history does not care about your feelings son
Ye bosdi wale hai inhe samjhana bekaar hai😅😂 ye itihaas garntho se badkar tv serial ko mante hai😅@@ManishSharma-tc2ue
Oh mere munna, apni aankhe khol ree.😂😂
Karna is a tragic hero
Not a villain
Arjun was best warrior
Karna the great 🌞🏹🚩
Karn ko to bheem ne 3-4 bar hraya hai bhai
The questions the guy is asking just goes to show how simplistic ppl want things to be and want everything to be served on a platter rather than even try to understand and appreciate the nuances and complexities. We have been trained to think in only one way, the Western way
thoroughly enjoyed this talk
So glad to know! 😄
@@AwaaraMusaafir Nepali hindu here. And I discovered your channel recently through ami gantara and I really loved that and also your recent podcast with arun pandit. Looking forward to learn more from you and your guests.
Muni vyas ne humare itihas ko likh ke nahi diya, puzzle bana ke di ki log khelte rahein. Waah! 🫡
Puri baat kyi nahi btayi Virat yudh ki , arjun gandiv use kar rha tha or karna normal bow se lad rha tha uske baad bhi usne takar di thee , lekin arjun ke sath bhi bura hora tha usse yudh mein thats true lekin pura reference Dena chaiye
Are gyani agar normal bow hai to dusri baar kyo aaya
Aur Arjun us hi nahi lad Raha tha bhism kripa drona ashwathama ye bhi the duryodhan aur uske Bhai itno se lad Raha tha
Acha a tumhe kisne bataya? Ya tumhe sapna aya tha ki karn kon se dhanush se lad raha tha. Hare Krishna Hari bol 👍🙏😀
Bro bro.. लेकीन उस वक्त कर्न के कवच कुंडल नाही उतारे गये थे l ऑर करणं गंधर्व के साथ लडते हूये भी भागा था l गंधर्व से दुर्योधन को अर्जुन ने बाचाया था l
Bow karan jaisa bhi raha ho, per Arjun puri Sena aur maharathiyo se akela lada aur unko haraya. Arjun Balshaali bhi hai aur Mahaan bhi. Karn kuch nahi hai, Arjun ke saamne. Karna ka bekaar ki publicity ki hai.
@@harekrishna2291 iss bekar sawal jawab tumhe nahi milega , rehnedo or apna naam change bhagwaan ka apman na karo
I think arjun and karn they were not greatest warrior in Mahabharata.. both of them used chal ... But in my point abhimanyu was the no. 1 warrior in Mahabharat battle with 16 year age
First of all karna himself one of the kontaye and elder brother, student of bhagwaan parshuram. If all pandavs are strong then he too so powerful💪.
Secondly Chalo maan b le ki karna kaye bar hara hi to aise to krishna bhagwaan ne b arjun ko 2-3 bar karna se bachaya hi.
Agar karan itna strong ni tha to ye to sab mante he haina ki uska kavach kundal liya gya and dhoke se mara gya. Agar strong ni tha to kavach kundal and dhoke se marne ki jarurut he kyo pade?
Ispar to koi yakeet he ni krega yes aap keh skte ho just like any two powerful teams or player's sometimes some battles can be won or loose by someone it's doesn't means ki wo kam powerful hi .
And last don't forget that karn not use his vijay dhanush in all battles he used it only in main mahabharat battlefield on the other hand arjun always use his gandiv.
Vadan aur shrap naam ki bhi koi cheez hoti hai bhai,karn ko yuhi nahi mara usne apni jeevan mein bohut sara pap kiya tha isliye usko aisi maut mili,aur rahi baat vijaya dhanush ki toh karn anth tak vijaya dhanush ke sath hi ladh rha tha,marne se pehle bhi uske haat mein Vijaya dhanush hi tha
Arjun ne karn kya bigada tha? Woh koi daridri ghar mein nahi pala badha. woh Arjun dweshi tha woh ekmatra vyakti hai jisne drupadi ko vyesaha kaha. Woh yudha chahata tha.Apne dil per haath rakh kar sochiye arjun ko pata chalta ki karn uska bhai hai toh? Karn khalanayak hai, Abhimanyue ko mars woh chal gaya kya? Karn and dhritarashtra was responsinble for yudha.karn yudh rok sakta tha par arjun ko harana iss ekhi udeshya ke liye itna narsanhar hone diya, apne ahankar ke liye kul ka naash kiya.Aap kya bhagwan ko galat mante hai kya? Karn shuru se hi galat hi tha. Writers ne uska avadambar machaya hai, vyasji ka nazaria alag hai.
Dekh bhai krishn jo ki bhagwan the unone Arjun ko Chuna dharm ke sthapna keley agar krishna ne usko Chuna to obviously wo humans me greatest hoga Arjun nar hai and krishna Narayan.. that's it
He's cheater, liar, bhagoda..... arjun had very Astra from devta by doing penance unlike liar karna. And about कवच, kundal 😂😂😂 he already knew about it 😂 coz his father surya dev told him😂😂😂 and uske saath koi chal nai hua tha uske badle Mai usne bhi indrastra manga tha😂😂 agar itna hi strong tha toh gandharvo se kyu BHAGA😂😂 AUR HAAN "KARNA IS THE ONE WHO TOLD DUSHASAN TO TAKE OFF DRAUPADI'S CLOTHES 😂"😂 even told her beshya. What a great man 😢
@@prathmeshmore1938 bhai arjun ko sab like karte hai not because he's nar because he listens. Usne apna adhe se jyada Jeevan van Mai bitaya hai.sabka samman karta hai unlike karna who's always jealous and furious 😂
Is chaccha ki bato se ghanta farak nhi padne wala karna tab bhi king tha aur aaj bhi hai aur hamesha wahi hero rahega ❤😊
lol tere aise comment karne se Karna ko bhi ganta farak nahi padne vala
@@amitrohit6053 phir tumko kyu farak pada reply dene ke liye 😂
@@RutwikKawade maza aata hai tum jaise logo ko chedne me, jinko jab sach ka aaina dikha do to vo log kuch bhi nahi bol sakte
@@amitrohit6053 kaunsa sach bhai bhram me tum ji rahe ho chakke arjun ko hero maankar jo without krishna mamuli sainik ko bhi nhi maar sakta
Mtlb rehna toh bewakoof hi h. Saath dena toh galat ka hi h😂😂
Karan ko sai maan ne vale logo ke saath problem bhi uske jesi hi h khud ko glt maan na hi nhi h.
When we claim that Karna was cowardly and fled from battle, aren't we undermining the profound education imparted by Bhagwan Parshuram and the noble values instilled by Maa Radha? By questioning Karna's bravery, we inadvertently cast doubt on the teachings and upbringing provided by these revered figures, who shaped his character and principles.
KARNA WAS ALSO PROVEN TO BE BETTER THAN ALL 5 PANDAVAS IN THE END, NOT JUST ARJUNA - He was better mace fighter than Bheema, better at spear than Yudhistra, Better at sword play than Nakula, Sehadeva & of course better at bowmanship than his smaller brother Arjuna. Truly, the most powerful Pandava & the eldest brother of the five.
The proof is Krishna himself. If Karna was weaker than Arjuna, Krishna would never interfere. Because Karna was more powerful than Arjuna, even without his Kavacha, Kundala, Vasavi Shakti arrow, so Krishna interfered in the fight & told Arjuna to vadh Karna when the curses took effect, else Arjuna would never get the chance to vadh Karna again.
@@User124-c1y Bhagwan only interferes, when the evil side is more powerful. Karna, Bhisma, Drona were more powerful than all 5 Pandavas combined. Arjuna could never vadh Karna if Arjuna did not use the weak point of Karna, when he is defenseless due to curses. Krishna knew that, now u o.o do too.
In Mahabharat main warrior from Pandav side was Arjun .
Shri Krishna ji gave the knowledge of Gita to Arjun cause, Arjun was unwilling to fight against his won brother, guru, grandfather Bhishma..
Even after getting the knowledge from krishna ji Arjun still not fight with his potential and power .
After the death of veer abhimanyu Arjun fight with some of his potential .
Karna left duryodhana alone in the battle against Gandharva and flew away , Arjun save duryodhana
Karna left duryodhana again in the battle of virat.
Arjun beat all the warrior twice before he used samohani astra .
Only ashwatthama gave hard fight against arjun ,karn flew away twice.
Except Dronacharya, Bhishma, kripacharya , other warrior were undress by Arjun .
Shri Krishna gave Arjun a name called 'vijaya' means one who won all war .
Arjun praised as' parantapa' by Lord Krishna ji in Bhagavad Gita..
Parantapa means - one who conquered enemies..
Bhagavad gita chapter 4 , verse 5 -
Lord Krishna said" both you and I have had many birth , o Arjun , you have forgotten them, while i remember them all , O Parantapa "
Before say something research it
@@IQuit1999 so o.o much writing, but you still cannot get the fact straight. Karna was stronger than the 5 pandavas combined. Krishna knew this, so he interfered. There was no need to interfere with Karna, if what you say is truth, little boi o.o
Result to sbko pta hai, kya ho sakta tha uski baat mat kro , kya huwa hai wahi itihaas me likha gya aur aage bhi jayega.
Mujhe ye nehi pata karn rath se utar ke kyu nehi Lada ?
Mahabharat me har ek yodha rath se utar ke lada hai .
Lord Shiva Statement’s Narrative-
As per Lord Shiva, Neither Humans nor Devta Possess it.
‘The illustrious god said, “O Pandava! I will give you the great pashupata weapon, dear to me. You will be capable of bearing, releasing and withdrawing it. The great Indra, Yama, the king of the yakshas,292 Varuna and Vayu do not know it. How can it be known to humans?
Even Arjuna said that Karna didn’t possess Pashupat-
I possess theterrible and great weapon that Pashupati gave me when there was a duel with the hunter.114 At the end of a yuga, that is employed by Pashupati to destroy all the beings. O tiger amongmen! I know how to use that. Gangeya does not know this, nor do Drona and Goutama. Oking! Neither do Drona’s son and the son of the suta.
Arjun never use pasupatastra cause there were no warrior in the Kauravas, who was more powerful than Arjun .
Pasupatastra need just a second to kill all Kauravas but as well as it destroy the whole universe .
When you have great divine power it comes responsibility.
Karna is best warrior ever ✌️❤️
Radhe karna 🙏🚩
SONY-PUTRA KARNA TV SHOW ek FAKE Show hai jo sirf Karna FANS ke liye hi banaya gayaa hai, magar ismein bhi karna apne raath kaa pahiyaa uthaane mei asamarth hai, ye hai uski taakat. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Itna badaa warrior ki apne rath kaa pahiya bhi nahi uthaa payaa mahabharat yuddh mein 😂😂😂😂
Itna bada worrior ka arjun ko usko chal se marna pada @@Red-Hood12
@@aliali115-ny3dv Even Shikhandi beats Karna also..😆😆😆😆😆😆
‘ “O great king! Shikhandi, the slayer of Bhishma, roamed around fearlessly and countered Karna with his arrows. Countered, Karna’s lips quivered in rage. He struck Shikhandi between his eyebrows with three arrows. With those arrows stuck there, Shikhandi looked exceedingly beautiful. He was like a silver mountain with three peaks. In the battle, having been thus grievously struck by the son of a suta in the encounter, he pierced Karna with ninety sharp arrows. Karn retreated and failed to counter the arrows of Shikhandi."
Karn parv chapter 44(BORI)
@@aliali115-ny3dv Karna was so coward, he got scared to fight with Arjuna in the final Mahabharata war, as he already knew, he was going to lose (as usual🤣🤣🤣), so he made an excuse not to fight war as long as Bheeshma was alive, as Duryodhan, this time, would send Karna directly to fight with Arjuna alone (Karna always used to attack Arjuna in Groups and still he loose🤣🤣🤣). But after Bheeshma's fall Karna had no choice but to fight, or else he would be labelled as a 'Coward'.
Karna was not rejected by Bheeshma not to participate in the war, it was Karna's own choice. Karna was a KING of Anga Desh, which was a separate Kingdom than Hastinapur, so Bheeshma had NO JURISDICTION over Karna at all, also Bheeshma was a Commander in Chief of Hastinapur, NOT a KING, so he cannot give any order to another King - Karna. Besides that, Duryodhan was a king, so he can give order. (Karna took a vow not to fight alongside Bheeshma as long as Bheeshma was alive - This is clearly mentioned in Ved Vyas ji's Mahabharata), Obviously it was Karna's choice as he could fight separately alongside Kauravas, but he didn’t, CLEARLY HE WAS SCARED OF ARJUNA.
Vyash didn't write Mahabharat, Vyash is the story teller and Ganesh ji wrote Mahabharat.
true...bhai ek doubt, ganesh ji wrote 8800 verse right..then 24000 came from where
@@HarinandS-t9c You speak as if you were sitting next to Ganesh ji and counting.
@@HarinandS-t9c jo log aage story ko likhte gaye unhone apna version bhi daal diya original book name is Jay samhita later changed it in Mahabharat .
@@whysoserious1023no mahabharata was always 1 lac shloka. 8800 are kut shlokas not the original shloka
Also we know that history that history is written by winners not loosers, Prove that the writer was not biased. WE praise karna because you never beat him on same grounds. You took benefit of him on his lowest state saying this that paap. we indians came to a point that we think he was killed not on the war rules. Now because Indians are educated, they can connect the dots. Thanks
Jis jis ne Mahabharat padhi hai unko pata hai ke karn ek bhagoda, thha or humesha yudh se bhaag jata thha 🤣
Karn is real hero of mahabharat ❤
No Shri Krishna is real hero.
Dharma sansthapanarth sambhawami yuge yuge.
Karn is nothing infornt of Krishna.
Just 8 year boy defeat danav kansa in dandva yudha fight till only man survive and one has to dead . Krishna at 8 year age Just with power of hand no weapon . And even karna can't beat age old kansa father in law jarasandh.
Yututsva was better than karna . He choose Dharma marg instead of adharma marg. Karn can't take correct decision to choose Dharma he can't be hero.
Amazing episode, good to see that people are actually trying to showcase truth now.
These are thousand of year old epics, there are different versions of the story with the same characters. There is no such thing as 100% accuracy with mahabharata.