ये दोनो मधरचोद, हिंदू लोगो कि आस्था के साथ खेलवार कर रहे है हिंदुस्तान को बाटने की बात कर रहे है हिंदुस्तांको मुस्लिम राज्य बनाना चाहते है कुछ चांद पैसे के लिए। kuran Bible पे तो ये लोग एक sabdh नही बोलेंगे मौलवी के औलाद है। जब देखो हिंदुओं की ही आस्था को tesh पहुंचते है ये देश ध्रोही
@@AdeetiChaudharyदुर्योधन मुंह पर बोलता है " हाँ मैं दुष्ट हूं तो दुष्ट हूं " लेकिन जो दृष्ट होकर भी अच्छाई का दिखावा करते हैं वह सबसे बड़े पापी होते हैं 🙏
"Jo satya hai, wo satya hai" She said this confidently because she has studied everything. I agree with her every point. As most of us haven't read the scriptures like Ramayana and Mahabharata, we have to listen to those who have studied about them and not from the reels and so on. Ami Ganatra ma'am is one of my favourite person who talks about these things... Best ❤
agar karna arjun se kamjor hota to bhagvan shri krishna arjun ko nihattey karna ko marne k lie nahi kehtey aur chal sai indra uska kavach nahi lekey jata uske sath bhot galat hua tha
Kya tum jante ho karn agle janam me danav the or unhe Surya Dev ne vardan di thi 1000 kawach ki uske baad wo duniya me tabahi machaye thi...to is liye 1000 kawach se 999 kawach sree Hari Vishnu ki manav avtaar nar or narayan ne tabah kar di thi... Or jab sirf ek kawach bach gaya tha tab wo suriya dev ki saran me gaya bach ne ke liye or suriya ji unhe apne andar samah liya tha...then dawpar yug me jab karn payda hua to wo kawach or kundal ke sath pyada hua tha... Or Nar as Arjun and Narayan as shree Krishna to wo kawachor kundal to nasth hona hi tha..@@amazingtop1040
@@amazingtop1040 karn ne bhi chal se abhimanyu ko mara tha na ? Tb use yad nahi aaya ? Aur yudh mai Rath se utakar bhi yudh ladhe gaye hai pr karn ko toh drama Krna tha 😂
@@amazingtop1040ye kab hua Bhai ye to serial me hai ki wo nihatta hai par wo jab rath se niche utara tab bhi wo yudh kar raha tha eek point me wo rukh gaya aur dharm ka baat karne laga tab Sri Krishna ji usko uski kiye gaye sabh karm bata te hai aur wo bhi fir se yudh karne keliye tayar hota hai par usko mantras yaad nahi ata Jo uska kiya karm ka shrap hai
What i really liked about the host is that he was so respectful and so eager to learn the facts, a lot of podcast hosts act as if they know everything and try to compete with the experts, but I appreciate the way Akshit hosted the show and was so respectful but also asking the right questions to clear all the doubts. Hats off to you for bringing forward such a great podcast 🥰
Library » Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (Bhāgavata Purāṇa) » Canto 1: Creation » CHAPTER EIGHT ŚB 1.8.25 विपद: सन्तु ता: शश्वत्तत्र तत्र जगद्गुरो । भवतो दर्शनं यत्स्यादपुनर्भवदर्शनम् ॥ २५ ॥ vipadaḥ santu tāḥ śaśvat tatra tatra jagad-guro bhavato darśanaṁ yat syād apunar bhava-darśanam Synonyms vipadaḥ - calamities; santu - let there be; tāḥ - all; śaśvat - again and again; tatra - there; tatra - and there; jagat-guro - O Lord of the universe; bhavataḥ - Your; darśanam - meeting; yat - that which; syāt - is; apunaḥ - not again; bhava-darśanam - seeing repetition of birth and death. Translation I wish that all those calamities would happen again and again so that we could see You again and again, for seeing You means that we will no longer see repeated births and deaths. Purport Generally the distressed, the needy, the intelligent and the inquisitive, who have performed some pious activities, worship or begin to worship the Lord. Others, who are thriving on misdeeds only, regardless of status, cannot approach the Supreme due to being misled by the illusory energy. Therefore, for a pious person, if there is some calamity there is no other alternative than to take shelter of the lotus feet of the Lord. Constantly remembering the lotus feet of the Lord means preparing for liberation from birth and death. Therefore, even though there are so-called calamities, they are welcome because they give us an opportunity to remember the Lord, which means liberation. One who has taken shelter of the lotus feet of the Lord, which are accepted as the most suitable boat for crossing the ocean of nescience, can achieve liberation as easily as one leaps over the holes made by the hoofs of a calf. Such persons are meant to reside in the abode of the Lord, and they have nothing to do with a place where there is danger in every step. This material world is certified by the Lord in the Bhagavad-gītā as a dangerous place full of calamities. Less intelligent persons prepare plans to adjust to those calamities without knowing that the nature of this place is itself full of calamities. They have no information of the abode of the Lord, which is full of bliss and without trace of calamity. The duty of the sane person, therefore, is to be undisturbed by worldly calamities, which are sure to happen in all circumstances. Suffering all sorts of unavoidable misfortunes, one should make progress in spiritual realization because that is the mission of human life. The spirit soul is transcendental to all material calamities; therefore, the so-called calamities are called false. A man may see a tiger swallowing him in a dream, and he may cry for this calamity. Actually there is no tiger and there is no suffering; it is simply a case of dreams. In the same way, all calamities of life are said to be dreams. If someone is lucky enough to get in contact with the Lord by devotional service, it is all gain. Contact with the Lord by any one of the nine devotional services is always a forward step on the path going back to Godhead.
@@sufisufiyansufyanAhmedkhanboyo sorry bhai wo phone lag kr rha tha toh glti se ho gya tha delete maar deta hu okay. Isse agar aapko kuch dikkat hua ho toh maaf krna
Also, Krishna defeated Jarasandha all 18 times when he tried to attack Mathura. But he knew that Jarasandha is after the land and will never bog down from his relentless attacks. So, for the larger good of the people, Shri Krishna took all his men & women from Mathura and left for Dwarka. He's not called "Ranchhod" because he was defeated by Jarasandha, but is called Ranchhod because he left the battlefield and took his people with him leaving no man behind.
@@pastorjosephsingh4947 I don't take "pastors" seriously but since you've asked, Krishna died in Mausala Parva of Mahabharat by a hunter named Jara's arrow on his feet. He purposefully left his feet vulnerable when Maharishi Durvasa asked him to apply frumenty on his body. He did not apply frumenty on his legs. Hence his entire body was indestructible by weapons but not his soles. Now tell me when and how did Jesus die? And why those who killed him are having a branch of christianity named after them "Roman Catholics" ?
@@BrightKnight24 Thanks! Firstly, don't you think that story is also in Greek mythology- the Achilles heel? Now to your question. Is it that you as a well read wise man really ignorant about the death of Christ and the Roman Catholics? Firstly, Jesus Christ was crucified by the Roman Empire in Jerusalem. He was tried by the Jewish courts or Senhedrin but since they had no way of executing Jesus they took Him to Pilate. You can read about His death which is given in every detail in the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. Interestingly, Jesus had also foretold his death nearly three times directly to people which is recorded and you can read about it. But He also told them on the third day I will rise again from the dead. All these are prophesied about Him in the Old Testament. The joy of all this is the good news that after dying on the cross Jesus rose from the dead on the third day ans showed Himself for forty days. On the fortieth day He ascended to heaven and promised to return again to judge all men living and dead.Now about your next doubt and question. Please see the next part.
Ami Ganatra ji is excellent 👌.she cleared up the cobwebs and far fetched stories with clarity. She's highly educated, extremely capable researcher, having thorough understanding of Sanskrit and a very good orator. Highly intelligent and sensible woman. I'm certainly going to buy both Ramayana and Mahabharata unravelled. 🙏🕉️
Thanks. I have downloaded the e-book. I am old-fashioned fashion like to have a hard copy to pass on to my Grandchildren also handy when I am travelling.😉😉@@priyalpatel1108
First, you can read the original scriptures , UNDERSTAND PROPERLY and have your views. Then you can read what other EXTENSIVELY READ people have written. Better not read books by half baked people.
Loved the episode... I have been telling people from past 15 years to read the actual Mahabharat rather than going by serial based information I'm soooo glad there are people who give importance to our original ITIHAS rather than edited versions 👌👌👌 Reading Mahabharat will really enlighten you... and you can find reasons for everything... And you will actually realise that KARM is the real hero... and our future is totally dependent upon our KARM... I would love to read her book... Hope she's mentioned that it was actually Karna who ordered disrobing of Draupadi
agar karna arjun se kamjor hota to bhagvan shri krishna arjun ko nihattey karna ko marne k lie nahi kehtey aur chal sai indra uska kavach nahi lekey jata uske sath bhot galat hua tha
Awesome episode Also, the episode of kunti asking Lord krishna for sorrow in life, come in Shrimad Bhagavat puran. She asks - विपदस्सन्तु न: शश्वत् तत्र तत्र जगद्गुरो। भवतो दर्शनं यत्साद् अपुनर्भवदर्शनम्।।
Thank you so much for this video i know the true knowledge about our history and there characters so many true history is still hiding from us or its banished by the long periods of time…lots of love from nepal🇳🇵AUM(OM) SANATAN 🙏
Mai bhi kabhi Sony Putra Karn dekhke bohot bada bhakt ho gaya thaa karn ka... Lekin jabse ma'am ke podcasts ko dekhne laga and thoda apne dharm ke baare mei jaanne laga tabse mere sabhi misconceptions about karn burst ho gaye...🙂🙏🏻
Mein bhi bro karn ko idol manta tha serial dhek ke, bad jab bhagwad gita padi tab pata chala sabse bada dongi karna tha bus apna victim card use karta tha.
One thing is for sure. Lots of stories are made as an moral for future generations, and lots of just for making it look as a joke .. So we as a learner really required and responsible towards next generation to gain and spread proper and true knowledge only
आपके द्वारा किए हुए प्रथम प्रश्न का उत्तर श्रीमद्भागवत महापुराण के प्रथम स्कंध के आठवें अध्याय के 25 श्लोक में है।। और यह पुराण भी व्यास जी ने ही लिखा है जिन्होंने महाभारत की रचना की है। आपका प्रश्न यथार्थ सत्य है यह बात कुंती जी ने अपनी स्तुति में कही है।। जय श्री राधे💐💐
In my opinion- regarding Eklavya, probably Dronacharya must have been considerably worried- seeing the pitiable condition of the dog- whose only way of expression is barking, and Eklavya caused the dog such pain with him stitching up the dog’s mouth with his arrows- Dronacharya wanted to teach Eklavya a lesson- and also, maybe as a guru, in foresight he was concerned about the kind of destruction that Eklavya could bring about- due to his temper issues!
Naah bro, accept it ,drona charya really did that bcz eklavya might have stronger and skilled than his favourable candidate arjuna. And also i didn't got the point why eklavya want to learn skills from dronacharya, don't he knew he was "Rajguru" of Hastinapur, means he only teaches hastinapur's prince's
@@_Bappu_it's because he is a spy in the form of sishya but a innocent one and had learnt all the Vidya by hiding and was son of the army general of jarasandha so the tactics he learnt here would in turn help jarasandh to have a upper hand on kurus and pandus so he asked him his finger
@@sabyasachipanda9459 if Lord Krishna would've did that it's understandable but Drona did it for purpose, mind drona was not saint, he also had intentions.
Karna’s Karma Introduction: Is there any Indian who has not heard about Karna? As a major character of the Mahābhārata epic, it is the case that Karna’s generosity is never in doubt although his dharma is nearly always brought into disrepute. There are many who think that Karna was a much misunderstood character of the Mahabharata. However, there are many more who think that Karna was “evil”. I do not attempt to take sides in this dispute, but I do seek to set the facts straight. Readers can decide which side of the debate they wish to stand on: the side of Karna or the side of Arjuna. The aim of the first part of this essay (divided into a few parts) is to point out the verses which support the position that Karna’s position was against Dharma. Pramana 1: Verses from Adhyaya 91 of Karna Parva: In the 91st Adhyaya of Karna Parva, we find the understanding of why Karna’s Dharma had indeed faltered terribly despite having an amsha of Surya himself. This monologue arises when the wheel of Karna’s chariot has sunk into the mud and Karna requests Arjun not to shoot an arrow at him citing Dharma. Sri Krishna asks Karna why he could not differentiate between right and wrong ((ie. where had Dharma disappeared) when he had advised Duryodhana to poison Bhima and to get him bitten by snakes? Sri Krishna asks Karna why he could not differentiate between right and wrong (ie. where had Dharma disappeared) when Duryodhan, Dushasan, and Shakuni (born of Saubal) had summoned Draupadi who was in a single piece of cloth and menstruating, into the courtroom? Sri Krishna asks Karna why he could not differentiate between right and wrong ((ie. where had Dharma disappeared) when the Pandavas did not get their kingdom back despite the fact that they had completed their Vanvasa ? (verse 4 above) Sri Krishna asks Karna why he could not differentiate between right and wrong ((ie. where had Dharma disappeared) when he had tried to burn the Pandavas alive? Sri Krishna asks Karna why he could not differentiate between right and wrong ((ie. where had Dharma disappeared) when he had seen Dushasan holding and trying to strip the menstruating Draupadi? Sri Krishna asks Karna why he could not differentiate between right and wrong (ie. where had his Swadharma gone) when he was staring at the menstruating and innocent Draupadi with his eyes? Sri Krishna asks Karna why he could not differentiate between right and wrong (ie. where had his Swadharma gone) when he advised the helpless, menstruating and innocent Draupadi that her husbands were now going too Naraka/ hell and hence she should wed somebody else? All this while he was continuously staring at Draupadi with his eyes (perhaps full of lust? Perhaps full of greed? We will explore later). Sri Krishna goes on to say that when he (Karna) had enticed the Pandavas to play a second game of dice using the help of the cunning Shakuni, because of his greed for the kingdom) where had Karna’s Swadharma disappeared? Sri Krishna continues that when he (Karna) had surrounded the (bala) 16 year old Abhimanyu inside the Chakravyuha with all the other Kaurava warriors and killed him, where had Karna’s Swadharma disappeared? After this long monologue detailing Karna’s misdeeds, Sri Krishna says that Karna cannot be freed of the consequences of his deeds in this lifetime, no matter what Dharma (good deeds) he would now try and perform. (The significance here is to Karna’s Daana perhaps) We see that Karna is far from blameless in the entire episode. He was by far one of the most powerful Kaurava warriors. Why did he not stop the attempted public disrobing of Draupadi? In fact, from Krishna’s words, we see quite the opposite: we see that it was Karna who advised Dushasan to disrobe and humiliate Draupadi. This clearly would be against Kshatriya maryada and karma. In fact, Karna repents for his mistake much later but by then the damage has been done. Discussion: The Anjalika Divyastra is described in some detail in the text of the Mahābhārata even comparing it to a Kritya invoked by mantras invoked by Angirasa Rsi and which caused the four directions to become illuminated including the sky and the earth. Seeing the Divya astra Anjalika, the whole of nature quivered in fear and the Rsi’s started chanting mantras to pacify nature. Here, Arjun says something very interesting which I reproduce: Arjun says in verses 46 and 47 of chapter 91 (GP) that “If I have satisfied my Guru with my service and if I have performed tapascharya, then let the power of my truth (embodied by my arrow) finish off my extremely strong enemy Karna. At the same time, if we take ourselves back to chapter 90 (GP edition), then we see that Karna has forgotten the one thing which will save his life: The Bhargavastra of his Guru, (Mahatma) Parshuram. What is that verse? This verse is verse 82 of the preceding chapter 91 which explains that Karna’s mind could not remember the Bhargava Astra of Parshurama which could have saved his life. The word Bhargava is of course derived from the root which appears in the celebrated Gayatri mantra. Perhaps here the idea is “that which could have illuminated his mind” chose to desert him at the crucial juncture of his life. We get a similar idea from the preceding verse of this chapter which says that the curse of Parshurama caused his wheels to sink into the ground at that crucial juncture. Here is that verse: The words “Kaalo Hyadrsho Vipra Kopann darshayan karnavadham Bruvanah” explain the severity of the karmic consequence which Karna got caught up in. However, in the first part of the essay, it becomes quite clear that Karna was far from blameless in the sequence of events which occurred. Could Draupadi have cursed him too? Perhaps she may well have. The duty of a strong and powerful Kshatriya would be to stop Draupadi from being humiliated by being dragged into the assembly in a state of undress. Karna in the end was undone by his own misdeeds and the tears of a woman.
🤣🤣🤣🤣achaa tu spammer hai kya kon gamdu ne tujhe itna likh kar diya hai ?? tere jitne bhi baat hai aadhe adhoore thik waise hi jaise AMI ji ke kitab main knowledge 😂😂
@sigma_01460 do check your facts first karn taunted as vaishya a whore to draupadi n also said that this cheer haran should happen to her so don't try to defend him that he didn't do anything
@sigma_01460 I have read the comment and I'm not saying that yudhisthir ne kbhi galat ni Kiya or Arjun didn't but I think you didn't listened to the podcast even it's clearly mentioned that he was very envy of Arjun and always force duryodhan to enlop in a fight so why not critise him and btw what yudhisthir did krishna criticised him. Arjun part I didn't heard about this what the source of claiming Arjun robed subhadra
@sigma_01460 he was not an ideal man and also he was from bhramin mother n kshatriye father so there is no other factor like sut putra in the podcast ami explained what sut means in their era
@sigma_01460 नारायणं नमस्कृत्य नरं चैव नरोत्तमम् । देवीं सरस्वतीं व्यासं ततो जयमुदीरयेत् ॥ ४ ॥ I offer my humble obeisances to Narayan and Nara (Arjun), unto Devi Saraswati, unto Vyasa by whose mercy the entire Vedic history known as Jaya became known to the world. This shloka appears as the first shloka of Mahabharat. It also appears in Bhagavata Purana at 1.2.4. Bhagavad Gita: Chapter 10, Verse 37 वृष्णीनां वासुदेवोऽस्मि पाण्डवानां धनञ्जय: | vṛiṣhṇīnāṁ vāsudevo ’smi pāṇḍavānāṁ dhanañjayaḥ Translation BG 10.37: Amongst the descendants of Vrishni, I am Krishna, and amongst the Pandavas I am Arjun.
agar karna arjun se kamjor hota to bhagvan shri krishna arjun ko nihattey karna ko marne k lie nahi kehtey aur chal sai indra uska kavach nahi lekey jata uske sath bhot galat hua tha
Krishna ne kishi ko nhi khtm Kia , Jo jeeta wo bhi Krishna jo Hara wo bhi Krishna . Hr Kan me Narayan ❤. To Jeet haar to ek hi ka hua wo the Krishna ❤❤❤
Jo Shri krishna ke best friend h, shiv ji ne khud jise blessing di ho, Devraj Indra jise Swarg me invite Kiya ho & Hanuman ji jiske protector ho, wo taarif ke kabil to hoga hi na.
वाह बेटी आपकी ज्ञान की बाते, बहुत अच्छा लगा। में, नेपाल कि राजधानी काठमाण्डु से हुँ, में, भीमसेन की जो दुस्री पत्नी हिडिम्बा थी उनका बेटा घटोच कच का। बेटा बार्वरीक का वंशज हुँ आपकी अध्ययन को मेँ, बहुत ईज्जत करता हूँ। आज भी हम हमारे परदादा बर्वरिक के सीरको मंदिर बनाकर रख्खे हैं, और आज तक हम कूल देवता के रूप में मानते हैं, हम अपने बिधिके अनुशार पुजा करते हैं, आइएगा तो। आपको प्रमाण मिलेगा हाँ। सभिको ज्ञान नहीं है जो वहाँ पुजारी हैं उनको भी पता नहीं है, जानने कि ईच्छा हो। आपको तो हमसे मिल्के जान सकते हैं, 🙏💐🌺🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
This whole video is only for people who didn't know anything! But those who read and learn from past 10 years , knowledge she had shared is okay not vast not perfect, but okay for future generation!
Ami Ganatra is amazing both in terms of depth of knowledge and the way she explains! Karna has been over glamorized by recent books and serials. Yes, some injustices happened to him but he himself justified many more wrongs!
Justifying Dronacharya's act of demanding Eklavya's thumb is pure evil .. and Dronacharya faced karma as he died in war by cheating .. and his son cursed forever. That is the moral of the story intended by Vyas.
Eklavya ne bhi Karan ki tarah guru se bina puche sikhasa li thi Aaj aap kisi private teacher ki khud ki likhi hui book jisse vo apne khud ke students ko sikha rahe us me se chori se sikhoge to uske man me bhi aapke liye gussa hi aayega Arjun Dronacharya ka favourite students tha fir bhi usse narayanastra ka gyan nahi diya tha to Arjun ruka nahi usne aur bhi kai guru se sabhi divyastra ke gyan liye jisme sammohan astra ka to Dronacharya ke paas bhi koi tod nahi tha Per Dronacharya ne bhi galti ki aur unhone adharm ka sath diya isliye vo bhi mare gaye aur Drustdym ne unke head ke bal pakkad ke unka head kat diya tha jo usnka apman hi tha
@@GVA369 1. Karn ke Sarpmukhi ban se Sri Krishna ne Arjun ko bachaya 2. Foot Soldiers Arjun mardeta agar Sri Krishna nhi hota to 3. Shrutyudha ke gadha ke prahar se bhi bachaya 4. Bhagdutt ke Vaishnavastra bhi bachaya Arjun To bhai Apke Ami gantra ji Asab q nhi explain kar rha hai 🤣🤣🤣🤣
About the first portion of the podcast, Kunti Devi really told Krishna, & it is really true because it mentioned on the Bhagavatam Mahapuran ( Mahabharat & Bhagavatam both are written by Maharshi Krishna Dvaipayana Vedavyasa : SB 1.8.25 विपद: सन्तु ता: शश्वत्तत्र तत्र जगद्गुरो । भवतो दर्शनं यत्स्यादपुनर्भवदर्शनम् ॥ २५ ॥ vipadaḥ santu tāḥ śaśvat tatra tatra jagad-guro bhavato darśanaṁ yat syād apunar bhava-darśanam Synonyms vipadaḥ - calamities; santu - let there be; tāḥ - all; śaśvat - again and again; tatra - there; tatra - and there; jagat-guro - O Lord of the universe; bhavataḥ - Your; darśanam - meeting; yat - that which; syāt - is; apunaḥ - not again; bhava-darśanam - seeing repetition of birth and death. Translation I wish that all those calamities would happen again and again so that we could see You again and again, for seeing You means that we will no longer see repeated births and deaths.
No. Here is what that verse is about: The verse 1.8.25 from the Śrīmad Bhāgavatam is a part of the prayers offered by Queen Kunti to Lord Krishna. Queen Kunti is a central figure in the Mahabharata, and she is known for her deep devotion to Lord Krishna. In this chapter, she is expressing her heartfelt devotion and admiration for Krishna, recognizing Him as the Supreme Divine. The verse 1.8.25 in Sanskrit is as follows: विषान्महाग्नेः पुरुषाददर्शनादसात्सभाया वनवासकृच्छ्रतः । मृधे मृधे ऽनेकमहारथास्त्रतो द्रौण्यस्त्रतश्चास्म हरेऽभिरक्षिताः ॥ Translation (by A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada): "My dear Krishna, Your Lordship has protected us from a poisoned cake, from a great fire, from cannibals, from the vicious assembly, from sufferings during our exile in the forest and from the battle where great generals fought. And now You have saved us from the weapon of Ashvatthama." In this verse, Queen Kunti is recounting the various life-threatening dangers that she and her family faced, and she is expressing her gratitude to Lord Krishna for protecting them in each of these situations. She acknowledges Krishna’s divine protection and expresses her unwavering faith in Him. This verse highlights the theme of divine protection and the grace that the Lord bestows upon His devotees, which is a recurring theme in the Bhagavata Purana. Queen Kunti’s prayers are often cited as an example of pure devotion and surrender to God.
Rashmirathi, Mrityunjay, Tv serials main reason for this Misinterpretation and Now people are so blinded that they even ready to say that Vyaas Mahabharat is not the only one, ye unka perspective tha and like bhai ye hai kaliyug where adharmis like Ravana and Karna get praised 👍
@sigma_01460 However, though that spear has now gone, I swear to you truthfully that he is incapable of being killed by anyone. He is devoted to brahmanas. He is truthful. He has engaged in austerities. He is devoted to his vows. He is compassionate towards his enemies. It is for these reasons that Karna is known as Vrisha
@sigma_01460 jiss insaan se sabse jyada knowledge milti ho inhone usse ravan se compare kar diya 👀👀 dekh rahe ho bhai kaise ye log rakchas ko insaan se compare kar rahe hai arjun ne itne kaand kiye inko wo nahi dikhta lekin karn ne wo baat bol di jo ki rules main hai or thoda gusse main tha toh hass diya ye log usko badhaa chadha kar dikhate hai khud nahi batayenge arjun kaisa tha pandavas kaise thee unke bhi karname aise hi thee
No, according to mahabharat eklavya continued to practice with his right hand but could not shoot arrows with same amount of skill as before . In entire mahabharat only arjun could shoot with both hands with equal skill ( hence he was given the name savyasachi)
@@drshrikantab2340and it was Dronacharya himself who pointed out Eklavya to use his two fingers index and middle finger to shoot the arrow. ( द्रोणाचार्य ने इशारे से एकलव्य को बताया कि कैसे तर्जनी और मध्यमा अंगुली की सहायता से बाण चलाया जाता है).
agar karna arjun se kamjor hota to bhagvan shri krishna arjun ko nihattey karna ko marne k lie nahi kehtey aur chal sai indra uska kavach nahi lekey jata uske sath bhot galat hua tha
@@mayankindian3750 agar karna arjun se kamjor hota to bhagvan shri krishna arjun ko nihattey karna ko marne k lie nahi kehtey aur chal sai indra uska kavach nahi lekey jata uske sath bhot galat hua tha
This episode of Kunti praying to Lord Krishna is in Srimad Bhagavatha Mahapurana. It is not folklore. It is part of purana, though the episode is not part of Vyasa Mahabharata.
Dekho bro jo puran likhe gye vo bhakto dwara likhe gye apne parambrambh ke gungaan me 2. Jo puran hai vo history nhi hai hamare bharat ki usme bhot saari katho ka sangrah hai jisme jiwan jine ka dhang bataya gya hai aur bhot chote chote point bataye gye hai jisse bhot kuch sikhne ko milta hai BUT Jo ramayan aur mahabharat hain vo hamri history hai (jisme bhot milawat ho chuki hai foreign invaders ke dwara) bahut kam hi महाभारत और रामायण aapko genuine milenge usme se sabse sudh geetapress ka kha jata hai to Ye hamari history hai simple😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊
@@soul_dragger9998 Srimad Bhagavatha Mahapurana was written by Veda Vyasa only. I am only saying that the episode of Kunti praying to Lord Krishna is in Srimad Bhagavatha and this episode is not folklore per se.
srimad bhagwat mahapuran is an itihasa. its written closely in almost the same timeline of mahabharata by the same author... Maharishi Veda Vyasa. Its the first authentic itihasa scripture to tell us about the life of Shri Krishna, followed by the garga samhita.@@soul_dragger9998
@@KM-vi2bkbhai unhone bhakti bhaav se mana nahi Kiya hai ki galat hai suno toh sahi se lekin vo ye keh rhi ki usko leftist apni baate banane ke liye use karte unpar dhyan nahi dena hai
@@SOHAN_SINGH111 I am only clarifying and correcting that the episode of Kunti praying to Lord Krishna is in Srimad Bhagavatha Mahapurana and it is not folklore..Folklore means myth or some cooked up story..Whereas puranas are not all myth or all mithya per se. Also, Vyasa Mahabharata and Valmiki Ramayana are full of bhakti bhava. Whether one likes it or not doesn't matter at all. Both the ithihasas are not only just ' as it happened' but also full of bhakti bhavana also. The beauty of Ithihasas is that they are wonderful from all angles..Hindu Ithihasas and Bhakti can't be looked in isolation completely. So, one can't separate out bhakti from any of the Hindu scriptures, because the ultimate goal of every Hindu is Moksha which can attained only through proper bhakti and self surrender to Supreme Lord.
Example Achha Hone Ka 😂 1) Daanvir 2) Vijaydhanush Ka Ek Baar Use 3) Raaj ka Laalchh Nhi 4) Kabhi Apne Mittar Ko Ni Choda 5) Dharam Nhi Choda 6) Jeewan Mein Kabhi Kisi Se Kuch Maaga Ni
You are right bro according to Bhagwan krishna : कुण्डलाभ्यां निमायाथ दिव्येन कवचेन च । तां प्राप्यामन्यत वृषा सततं त्वां हतं रणे ॥२२॥ एवं गतेऽपि शक्योऽयं हन्तुं नान्येन केनचित् । ऋते त्वा पुरुषव्याघ्र शपे सत्येन चानघ ॥२३॥ ब्रह्मण्यः सत्यवादी च तपस्वी नियतव्रतः । रिपुष्वपि दयावांश्च तस्मात्कर्णो वृषा स्मृतः ॥२४॥ Meaning: I swear to you truthfully that he is incapable of being killed by anyone other than you. He is devoted to brahmanas. He is truthful. He has engaged in austerities. He is devoted to his vows. He is compassionate towards his enemies. It is for these reasons that Karna is known as Vrisha.
LOL😂😂😂😂 Kunti को आग मे जलाने की योजना शकुनी दुर्योधन के साथ श्री कृष्न को बंदी बनाने की कोशिश शकुनी दुर्योधन के साथ द्रौपदी के वस्त्र haran करने का आदेश सभी लोगों के सामने इंद्र से vashvi शक्ति मांगने के लिए गिड़गिड़ाना और नहीं देने पर कवच ना देने के लिए कहना दुर्योधन को बार बार अकेला छोड़कर भाग जाना अर्जुन से हमेशा जलते रहना According to वेद व्यास महाभारत 😂😂😂😂
1.Siksha ki bikh kisne mangi 2. Adharm ma sath diya duryodhan ka sath dekar 3. Raaj ka lalach tha isliye duryodhan ke sath yudhh lada. 4. Daanvir to tha hi aur budhhihi. Bhi tha 😂😂😂 5. Kabhi apne mitra ko nhi chhoda adharmi ka sath dene me ??😂😂😂
1. Danveer: But traded the Kavach Kundal with Vasawi Shakti since he knew he couldn't kill Arjun without it. 2. Vijay dhanush: Nothing special, still lost to Bhima while having Vijay Dhanush. 3. Raaj ka laalach nhi: Still accepted a free gift -- Kingdom of Anga 4. Kabhi Apne Mitra ko nhi chhoda: he fled away from Gandharva, leaving Duryodhana alone. 5. Dharam nhi chhoda: wanted to show off wealth to someone who is spending live in Forest as a punishment. 6. Jeewan mein kabhi kisi se kuchh maanga nhi: Asked Brahmastra from Guru Drona
but expert people know this normal peoples don't know when they realise what the expert is saying true then they feel embarrassed they have humble themselves before that happens otherwise embarrassment is something we have to face when we mess with experts
In the BORI Critical Edition (CE) of the Mahabharata, there is no mention that Karna received any formal training from Dronacharya, even in his early years. This particular narrative of Karna receiving initial training from Drona and later advanced training from Parashurama is found in later versions or regional retellings of the Mahabharata, but it is not present in the BORI CE, which aims to provide the most authentic and earliest version of the text by removing later interpolations.
Kunti ji ka jeevan mein dukh maangna satya hai! Ye cheez ka varnan bhagwat mahapuran mein milta hai jab vo bhagwan krishn ki stuti krti hain! I really like ami ganatra ji and love listening to her podcast unko ramayan Mahabharata ki bahaut knowledge hai but abhi unhe purano ke baare mein itna nhi pata!
Thank u for enlightening us about Karan. I just wanted to state that Karan childhood and his fate should also be counted for and his spirit of continuing his life should also be kept accounted for
Arjun was telented warrior.He is inspiration. Jo Shri krishna ke best friend h, shiv ji ne khud jise blessing di ho, Devraj Indra jise Swarg me invite Kiya ho & Hanuman ji jiske protector ho, wo taarif ke kabil to hoga hi na.
Kitna dwesh leke baitha ye Duryodhan. Apni poori family barbad kardi. Ye hi reason hai why this is part of pur culture to educate us and make us understand the consequences of hatered, ego, everything. This is the result if u keep burning in the fire of jealousy and hatered. Thanks for this episode. M here to listen to Ami ma'am ❤
@@megharajbinnal8126mahabharat yudh main jitne bhi log mare the wo heaven main gye the or jo jinda rh gye the pandavs wo hell gye the sirf dhratrastrya heaven gye the
I am sorry Ami ji reels ko sach man k apko galat samjhe log... Mein apni aur sabki aur se, apse kshama mangti hu... Mein bhi kayi baar apki baat se disagree thi par ab sach samjh aya ki asal me hua kya tha aur hume darshaya kya gaya.... Shukriya Ami ji ye facts sabke samne lane k liye....
This lady won my respect once more... literally every point she said are absolutely true.... people need to READ Mahabharat, Ramayan and other Granthas properly and never trust the propaganda
The story about kunthi praying Krishna for more troubles is TRUE. It is mentioned in Bhagavatha mahapuranam written by sri.veda Vyasji himself. It goes like this... vipadah santhu nah shashwath thatra thatra jagadguro.... It is in first skandha, 8th chapter, 25th shloka. This shows the pinnacle of Bhakthi kunthi had attained and is a lesson for us to reach that state of surrender. SO, TO DISCUSS OUR SACRED. GREAT HINDU SCRIPTURES, MAKE SURE TO HAVE PEOPLE WHO HAVE READ OUR SCRIPTURES EXTENSIVELY AND WITH KNOWLEDGE OF OUR DIVINE GREAT LANGUAGE SAMSKRIT (not sanskrit). They should have read the scriptures themselves instead of reading translations by half baked people. Nowadays it has become a fashion to discuss our holy scriptures with people with nil knowledge. Hope the point is driven home. We hindus don't have 'sar tan se juda' culture.
@@lokendermathur9566 Puranas are also written by veda vyasa. Science in encrypted in the narration. We people don't understand that. The whole picture can be understood ONLY with extensive study of puranas and not just some parts here and there or hearsay. What is untold in one scripture will be found in another. So , to discuss our sacred scriptures , it is better to invite people who are well read and understood the concepts.
Shakuni ka character sach me bohot accha play kia tha mahabharat me. Akshit ne bhi kaha "mamaji ki baat krte h"😂 Mamaji ya "bhanje" sunte hi shakuni ki yaad to aa jati h.
Mahabharat Unravelled Best Buy Links:-
Mahabharata Unravelled (हिंदी)- amzn.to/3F4IoNh
Mahabharata Unravelled (English)- amzn.to/45qt9sJ
Other Books from Ami Ganatra:-
Ramayana Unravelled (English)- amzn.to/3RNvQSg
ये दोनो मधरचोद, हिंदू लोगो कि आस्था के साथ खेलवार कर रहे है हिंदुस्तान को बाटने की बात कर रहे है हिंदुस्तांको मुस्लिम राज्य बनाना चाहते है कुछ चांद पैसे के लिए। kuran Bible पे तो ये लोग एक sabdh नही बोलेंगे मौलवी के औलाद है। जब देखो हिंदुओं की ही आस्था को tesh पहुंचते है ये देश ध्रोही
Bhai Mike par aawaz par dhyan do aadha to sunai nahi deta kya sunege fir hum
@storieswithakshit for kunti and krishna talk you can refer srimad bhagvatam. Kunti talks is known as kunti stuti. Canto i am not remembering now.
3 ss s.
Ye aurat karn se obsession me hai...😂
As a Hindu, I realised that I actually know more about Christianity & Islam, but lesser about Hinduism. Time to change.
U must know own home is more important than neibours'😊 hope I conveyed my msg with light mode.
But how do u know more about Christianity or Islam ?
Did u read about it or what ?
Follow God not the messenger.
Yes because Hinduism is a very vast and oldest religion with a lot of secrets and history unlike the recent ones
Aji ghanta@@yogyasharma885
शब्द नही हैं। जितनी प्रशंसा करूं कम है। पहली बार मुझे कोई ऐसा मिला जो महाभारत को मेरी तरह समझता है।
Ami ji ki book bhi padhye
Ami ji ki book bhi padhye
Wahi to 🙏🙏
@@AdeetiChaudharyदुर्योधन मुंह पर बोलता है " हाँ मैं दुष्ट हूं तो दुष्ट हूं " लेकिन जो दृष्ट होकर भी अच्छाई का दिखावा करते हैं वह सबसे बड़े पापी होते हैं 🙏
Bedbyas mahabharat padho usme dhornale karnako kahi bhi shikshya nahi diya he khud padho bharm me patpado video dekh ke gyani mat samjlo
"Jo satya hai, wo satya hai"
She said this confidently because she has studied everything. I agree with her every point. As most of us haven't read the scriptures like Ramayana and Mahabharata, we have to listen to those who have studied about them and not from the reels and so on.
Ami Ganatra ma'am is one of my favourite person who talks about these things... Best ❤
agar karna arjun se kamjor hota to bhagvan shri krishna arjun ko nihattey karna ko marne k lie nahi kehtey aur chal sai indra uska kavach nahi lekey jata uske sath bhot galat hua tha
Kya tum jante ho karn agle janam me danav the or unhe Surya Dev ne vardan di thi 1000 kawach ki uske baad wo duniya me tabahi machaye thi...to is liye 1000 kawach se 999 kawach sree Hari Vishnu ki manav avtaar nar or narayan ne tabah kar di thi... Or jab sirf ek kawach bach gaya tha tab wo suriya dev ki saran me gaya bach ne ke liye or suriya ji unhe apne andar samah liya tha...then dawpar yug me jab karn payda hua to wo kawach or kundal ke sath pyada hua tha... Or Nar as Arjun and Narayan as shree Krishna to wo kawachor kundal to nasth hona hi tha..@@amazingtop1040
@@amazingtop1040 karn ne bhi chal se abhimanyu ko mara tha na ? Tb use yad nahi aaya ? Aur yudh mai Rath se utakar bhi yudh ladhe gaye hai pr karn ko toh drama Krna tha 😂
@@amazingtop1040ye kab hua Bhai ye to serial me hai ki wo nihatta hai par wo jab rath se niche utara tab bhi wo yudh kar raha tha eek point me wo rukh gaya aur dharm ka baat karne laga tab Sri Krishna ji usko uski kiye gaye sabh karm bata te hai aur wo bhi fir se yudh karne keliye tayar hota hai par usko mantras yaad nahi ata Jo uska kiya karm ka shrap hai
@@dwapar_scriptures arjuna's rath backed off 10 times more compared to karna's
Satya basan Ma'am, sahi kaha app ne, kadachit ab kuch log vranti purna baato se bahar nikle, App ka bohut bohut dhanyabad 🌸Radhe Radhe 🌸🙏🏻
What i really liked about the host is that he was so respectful and so eager to learn the facts, a lot of podcast hosts act as if they know everything and try to compete with the experts, but I appreciate the way Akshit hosted the show and was so respectful but also asking the right questions to clear all the doubts. Hats off to you for bringing forward such a great podcast 🥰
Really loved the fact that real truth is out now. The youngester really need to see the whole truth before making any comments
Library » Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (Bhāgavata Purāṇa) » Canto 1: Creation » CHAPTER EIGHT
ŚB 1.8.25
विपद: सन्तु ता: शश्वत्तत्र तत्र जगद्गुरो ।
भवतो दर्शनं यत्स्यादपुनर्भवदर्शनम् ॥ २५ ॥
vipadaḥ santu tāḥ śaśvat
tatra tatra jagad-guro
bhavato darśanaṁ yat syād
apunar bhava-darśanam
Synonyms
vipadaḥ - calamities; santu - let there be; tāḥ - all; śaśvat - again and again; tatra - there; tatra - and there; jagat-guro - O Lord of the universe; bhavataḥ - Your; darśanam - meeting; yat - that which; syāt - is; apunaḥ - not again; bhava-darśanam - seeing repetition of birth and death.
Translation
I wish that all those calamities would happen again and again so that we could see You again and again, for seeing You means that we will no longer see repeated births and deaths.
Purport
Generally the distressed, the needy, the intelligent and the inquisitive, who have performed some pious activities, worship or begin to worship the Lord. Others, who are thriving on misdeeds only, regardless of status, cannot approach the Supreme due to being misled by the illusory energy. Therefore, for a pious person, if there is some calamity there is no other alternative than to take shelter of the lotus feet of the Lord. Constantly remembering the lotus feet of the Lord means preparing for liberation from birth and death. Therefore, even though there are so-called calamities, they are welcome because they give us an opportunity to remember the Lord, which means liberation.
One who has taken shelter of the lotus feet of the Lord, which are accepted as the most suitable boat for crossing the ocean of nescience, can achieve liberation as easily as one leaps over the holes made by the hoofs of a calf. Such persons are meant to reside in the abode of the Lord, and they have nothing to do with a place where there is danger in every step.
This material world is certified by the Lord in the Bhagavad-gītā as a dangerous place full of calamities. Less intelligent persons prepare plans to adjust to those calamities without knowing that the nature of this place is itself full of calamities. They have no information of the abode of the Lord, which is full of bliss and without trace of calamity. The duty of the sane person, therefore, is to be undisturbed by worldly calamities, which are sure to happen in all circumstances. Suffering all sorts of unavoidable misfortunes, one should make progress in spiritual realization because that is the mission of human life. The spirit soul is transcendental to all material calamities; therefore, the so-called calamities are called false. A man may see a tiger swallowing him in a dream, and he may cry for this calamity. Actually there is no tiger and there is no suffering; it is simply a case of dreams. In the same way, all calamities of life are said to be dreams. If someone is lucky enough to get in contact with the Lord by devotional service, it is all gain. Contact with the Lord by any one of the nine devotional services is always a forward step on the path going back to Godhead.
@@sufisufiyansufyanAhmedkhanboyo sorry bhai wo phone lag kr rha tha toh glti se ho gya tha delete maar deta hu okay. Isse agar aapko kuch dikkat hua ho toh maaf krna
@@sufyanahmedkhan4584 nhi
@@sufyanahmedkhan4584 bhai majak kyu udda rhe ho
@@Vaibhav_Kadnar__ no sir seriously I'm not messing around I'm serious 😅
An episode about lord krishna will be very nice.. lord krishnas untold stories with ami ganatra ji...
Also, Krishna defeated Jarasandha all 18 times when he tried to attack Mathura. But he knew that Jarasandha is after the land and will never bog down from his relentless attacks. So, for the larger good of the people, Shri Krishna took all his men & women from Mathura and left for Dwarka. He's not called "Ranchhod" because he was defeated by Jarasandha, but is called Ranchhod because he left the battlefield and took his people with him leaving no man behind.
is this written by Ved Vyas and or in any puranas or are you just repeating stories you've heard?
@@namehere2986 Had you ever picked up Vyasa Mahabharat other than reading facebook fan pages, you would know.
When and how did Krishna die?
@@pastorjosephsingh4947 I don't take "pastors" seriously but since you've asked, Krishna died in Mausala Parva of Mahabharat by a hunter named Jara's arrow on his feet. He purposefully left his feet vulnerable when Maharishi Durvasa asked him to apply frumenty on his body. He did not apply frumenty on his legs. Hence his entire body was indestructible by weapons but not his soles.
Now tell me when and how did Jesus die? And why those who killed him are having a branch of christianity named after them "Roman Catholics" ?
@@BrightKnight24 Thanks! Firstly, don't you think that story is also in Greek mythology- the Achilles heel? Now to your question. Is it that you as a well read wise man really ignorant about the death of Christ and the Roman Catholics? Firstly, Jesus Christ was crucified by the Roman Empire in Jerusalem. He was tried by the Jewish courts or Senhedrin but since they had no way of executing Jesus they took Him to Pilate. You can read about His death which is given in every detail in the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. Interestingly, Jesus had also foretold his death nearly three times directly to people which is recorded and you can read about it. But He also told them on the third day I will rise again from the dead. All these are prophesied about Him in the Old Testament. The joy of all this is the good news that after dying on the cross Jesus rose from the dead on the third day ans showed Himself for forty days. On the fortieth day He ascended to heaven and promised to return again to judge all men living and dead.Now about your next doubt and question. Please see the next part.
True and correct explanation about Karna. All the serials show wrong. Thank you Madam.
BRC mahabharat bhi
Ami Ganatra ji is excellent 👌.she cleared up the cobwebs and far fetched stories with clarity. She's highly educated, extremely capable researcher, having thorough understanding of Sanskrit and a very good orator. Highly intelligent and sensible woman. I'm certainly going to buy both Ramayana and Mahabharata unravelled. 🙏🕉️
Wonderful lady. I am so delighted to hear her. Bless her.👏👏 Pity can't get her books in the UK.
You can download ebooks
Thanks. I have downloaded the e-book. I am old-fashioned fashion like to have a hard copy to pass on to my Grandchildren also handy when I am travelling.😉😉@@priyalpatel1108
Same pinch hearing from England 😊
Very true
First, you can read the original scriptures , UNDERSTAND PROPERLY and have your views. Then you can read what other EXTENSIVELY READ people have written. Better not read books by half baked people.
Who is She? i m her Fan Now. The way She Described events is So beautiful. I agree with her👍👍👍👍👍👍
Ami ganatara ji😊
Ami Ganatra..She wrote 2 books, Mahabharata unravelled and Ramayana unravelled.
Loved the episode...
I have been telling people from past 15 years to read the actual Mahabharat rather than going by serial based information
I'm soooo glad there are people who give importance to our original ITIHAS rather than edited versions 👌👌👌
Reading Mahabharat will really enlighten you... and you can find reasons for everything...
And you will actually realise that KARM is the real hero... and our future is totally dependent upon our KARM...
I would love to read her book...
Hope she's mentioned that it was actually Karna who ordered disrobing of Draupadi
Pls brother mujhe batao konsi kitaab padhu Amazon main bahot sari aati hai
@@SaurabhxdMahabharat Unravelled,, link is there in description
agar karna arjun se kamjor hota to bhagvan shri krishna arjun ko nihattey karna ko marne k lie nahi kehtey aur chal sai indra uska kavach nahi lekey jata uske sath bhot galat hua tha
Pagal@@amazingtop1040
Really enjoyed the discussion. Very knowledgeable and fluent. God bless.
Everything is karma
जिसने जैसा कर्म किया उसको वैसा फल मिला
Awesome episode
Also, the episode of kunti asking Lord krishna for sorrow in life, come in Shrimad Bhagavat puran.
She asks - विपदस्सन्तु न: शश्वत् तत्र तत्र जगद्गुरो। भवतो दर्शनं यत्साद् अपुनर्भवदर्शनम्।।
Mam wonderful. Prnams.to your efforts. Jai Shri Ram.
Thank you so much for this video i know the true knowledge about our history and there characters so many true history is still hiding from us or its banished by the long periods of time…lots of love from nepal🇳🇵AUM(OM) SANATAN 🙏
Best information which you provided,we could know the both sides of the Kauravas and shree Krishna through this episode.
Mai bhi kabhi Sony Putra Karn dekhke bohot bada bhakt ho gaya thaa karn ka... Lekin jabse ma'am ke podcasts ko dekhne laga and thoda apne dharm ke baare mei jaanne laga tabse mere sabhi misconceptions about karn burst ho gaye...🙂🙏🏻
same bro
Mein bhi bro karn ko idol manta tha serial dhek ke, bad jab bhagwad gita padi tab pata chala sabse bada dongi karna tha bus apna victim card use karta tha.
@@tusharparwar7961 🙂👍🏻! Good
...Know the Truth, Spread The Truth...
@@Ex-MuslimEra still many people dont ready to accept.
Yeh madam Draupadi k paripreksh mein yeh sbb baatein bataa rhii h...
Karn mein buraii h lekin itnii bhii nhii kii Shakuni Drithrashtra Duryodhan Se bhii badaa adharmi ho....Usse sirff Arjun se nafrat thii kyokii binaa kisii yudh k arjun ko duniya kaa sabse badaa dhanurdhar kii upadhii pradan kaa dii gyii thii...
Kunti se bhii usne wadaa kiyaa thaa kii main aapke kisi bete ko nhii marungaa bass Arjun aur mujhmein se koi ek hii bachega
Abb yeh madam kehh rhii h kii Shakuni langdaa karr nhii chaltaa thaa toh madam jii yeh bataoo kii Shakuni k paas jaduii passe kaise aaye thee... Woh jaduii passe Shakuni k pitaa kii haddi thii aur Shakuni k pitaa ne hii Shakuni kaa pair todaa thaa taaki ussko apnaa badlaa zindagii bharr yaad rhe
So many questions I had in my mind for 3 years have been answered here 🤯
Friendship तो सिर्फ कृष्ण और सुदामा, कृष्ण और अर्जुन.
Sakha sakhi
@@ShivaniPimpalkaraur aaj kl ke nibba karn ko shree krishna se bhi upar mante hain
@@Vaibhav_Kadnar__ exactly specially GenZ
Sony putra corona ko bura lagega yar 😂 Aisa mat bolo
Thank you for bringing out the real truth. Loves the episode ❤
One thing is for sure.
Lots of stories are made as an moral for future generations, and lots of just for making it look as a joke
..
So we as a learner really required and responsible towards next generation to gain and spread proper and true knowledge only
Obviously bro wo likha hi us kaaran se hai 🥰🙏🇮🇳💪🕉️😇
आपके द्वारा किए हुए प्रथम प्रश्न का उत्तर श्रीमद्भागवत महापुराण के प्रथम स्कंध के आठवें अध्याय के 25 श्लोक में है।। और यह पुराण भी व्यास जी ने ही लिखा है जिन्होंने महाभारत की रचना की है। आपका प्रश्न यथार्थ सत्य है यह बात कुंती जी ने अपनी स्तुति में कही है।।
जय श्री राधे💐💐
In my opinion- regarding Eklavya, probably Dronacharya must have been considerably worried- seeing the pitiable condition of the dog- whose only way of expression is barking, and Eklavya caused the dog such pain with him stitching up the dog’s mouth with his arrows- Dronacharya wanted to teach Eklavya a lesson- and also, maybe as a guru, in foresight he was concerned about the kind of destruction that Eklavya could bring about- due to his temper issues!
Naah bro, accept it ,drona charya really did that bcz eklavya might have stronger and skilled than his favourable candidate arjuna. And also i didn't got the point why eklavya want to learn skills from dronacharya, don't he knew he was "Rajguru" of Hastinapur, means he only teaches hastinapur's prince's
Bhai, Geeta Press ke Orignal Vyas rachit padho, its same as Ami Ganyatra says. Dusre sub natak me added hei.
@@_Bappu_
Bhai eklavya magadh rajya se belong karta tha isiliye
Guru Dronacharya ne shatru rajya ke student ko siksha dene se mana kar diya 🙏
@@_Bappu_it's because he is a spy in the form of sishya but a innocent one and had learnt all the Vidya by hiding and was son of the army general of jarasandha so the tactics he learnt here would in turn help jarasandh to have a upper hand on kurus and pandus so he asked him his finger
@@sabyasachipanda9459 if Lord Krishna would've did that it's understandable but Drona did it for purpose, mind drona was not saint, he also had intentions.
Thnku so much both of u 🙏hmare sanatn dhrm k bare m es generation ko btane k lie...grt wrk👍🙌
Karna’s Karma
Introduction:
Is there any Indian who has not heard about Karna? As a major character of the Mahābhārata epic, it is the case that Karna’s generosity is never in doubt although his dharma is nearly always brought into disrepute. There are many who think that Karna was a much misunderstood character of the Mahabharata.
However, there are many more who think that Karna was “evil”. I do not attempt to take sides in this dispute, but I do seek to set the facts straight. Readers can decide which side of the debate they wish to stand on: the side of Karna or the side of Arjuna. The aim of the first part of this essay (divided into a few parts) is to point out the verses which support the position that Karna’s position was against Dharma.
Pramana 1: Verses from Adhyaya 91 of Karna Parva:
In the 91st Adhyaya of Karna Parva, we find the understanding of why Karna’s
Dharma had indeed faltered terribly despite having an amsha of Surya himself. This monologue arises when the wheel of Karna’s chariot has sunk into the mud and Karna requests Arjun not to shoot an arrow at him citing Dharma. Sri Krishna asks Karna why he could not differentiate between right and wrong ((ie. where had Dharma disappeared) when he had advised Duryodhana to poison Bhima and to get him bitten by snakes?
Sri Krishna asks Karna why he could not differentiate between right and wrong
(ie. where had Dharma disappeared) when Duryodhan, Dushasan, and Shakuni (born of Saubal) had summoned Draupadi who was in a single piece of cloth and menstruating, into the courtroom?
Sri Krishna asks Karna why he could not differentiate between right and wrong
((ie. where had Dharma disappeared) when the Pandavas did not get their kingdom back despite the fact that they had completed their Vanvasa ? (verse 4 above)
Sri Krishna asks Karna why he could not differentiate between right and wrong
((ie. where had Dharma disappeared) when he had tried to burn the Pandavas
alive?
Sri Krishna asks Karna why he could not differentiate between right and wrong
((ie. where had Dharma disappeared) when he had seen Dushasan holding and
trying to strip the menstruating Draupadi?
Sri Krishna asks Karna why he could not differentiate between right and wrong
(ie. where had his Swadharma gone) when he was staring at the menstruating and innocent Draupadi with his eyes?
Sri Krishna asks Karna why he could not differentiate between right and wrong
(ie. where had his Swadharma gone) when he advised the helpless, menstruating and innocent Draupadi that her husbands were now going too Naraka/ hell and hence she should wed somebody else? All this while he was continuously staring at Draupadi with his eyes (perhaps full of lust? Perhaps full of greed? We will explore later).
Sri Krishna goes on to say that when he (Karna) had enticed the Pandavas to play a second game of dice using the help of the cunning Shakuni, because of his greed for the kingdom) where had Karna’s Swadharma disappeared?
Sri Krishna continues that when he (Karna) had surrounded the (bala) 16 year old Abhimanyu inside the Chakravyuha with all the other Kaurava warriors and killed him, where had Karna’s Swadharma disappeared?
After this long monologue detailing Karna’s misdeeds, Sri Krishna says that Karna cannot be freed of the consequences of his deeds in this lifetime, no matter what Dharma (good deeds) he would now try and perform. (The significance here is to Karna’s Daana perhaps) We see that Karna is far from blameless in the entire episode. He was by far one of the most powerful Kaurava warriors. Why did he not stop the attempted public disrobing of Draupadi? In fact, from Krishna’s words, we see quite the opposite: we see that it was Karna who advised Dushasan to disrobe and humiliate Draupadi. This clearly would be against Kshatriya maryada and karma. In fact, Karna repents for his mistake much later but by then the damage has been done.
Discussion:
The Anjalika Divyastra is described in some detail in the text of the Mahābhārata even comparing it to a Kritya invoked by mantras invoked by Angirasa Rsi and which caused the four directions to become illuminated including the sky and the earth. Seeing the Divya astra Anjalika, the whole of nature quivered in fear and the Rsi’s started chanting mantras to pacify nature. Here, Arjun says something very interesting which I reproduce: Arjun says in verses 46 and 47 of chapter 91 (GP) that “If I have satisfied my Guru with my service and if I have performed tapascharya, then let the power of my truth (embodied by my arrow) finish off my extremely strong enemy Karna.
At the same time, if we take ourselves back to chapter 90 (GP edition), then we see that Karna has forgotten the one thing which will save his life: The Bhargavastra of his Guru, (Mahatma) Parshuram. What is that verse? This verse is verse 82 of the preceding chapter 91 which explains that Karna’s mind could not remember the Bhargava Astra of Parshurama which could have saved his life. The word Bhargava is of course derived from the root which appears in the celebrated Gayatri mantra. Perhaps here the idea is “that which could have illuminated his mind” chose to desert him at the crucial juncture of his life. We get a similar idea from the preceding verse of this chapter which says that the curse of Parshurama caused his wheels to sink into the ground at that crucial juncture. Here is that verse: The words “Kaalo Hyadrsho Vipra Kopann darshayan karnavadham
Bruvanah” explain the severity of the karmic consequence which Karna got caught up in. However, in the first part of the essay, it becomes quite clear that Karna was far from blameless in the sequence of events which occurred. Could Draupadi have cursed him too? Perhaps she may well have. The duty of a strong and powerful Kshatriya would be to stop Draupadi from being humiliated by being dragged into the assembly in a state of undress. Karna in the end was undone by his own misdeeds and the tears of a woman.
🤣🤣🤣🤣achaa tu spammer hai kya
kon gamdu ne tujhe itna likh kar diya hai ??
tere jitne bhi baat hai aadhe adhoore thik waise hi jaise AMI ji ke kitab main knowledge 😂😂
@sigma_01460 do check your facts first karn taunted as vaishya a whore to draupadi n also said that this cheer haran should happen to her so don't try to defend him that he didn't do anything
@sigma_01460 I have read the comment and I'm not saying that yudhisthir ne kbhi galat ni Kiya or Arjun didn't but I think you didn't listened to the podcast even it's clearly mentioned that he was very envy of Arjun and always force duryodhan to enlop in a fight so why not critise him and btw what yudhisthir did krishna criticised him. Arjun part I didn't heard about this what the source of claiming Arjun robed subhadra
@sigma_01460 he was not an ideal man and also he was from bhramin mother n kshatriye father so there is no other factor like sut putra in the podcast ami explained what sut means in their era
@sigma_01460 नारायणं नमस्कृत्य नरं चैव नरोत्तमम् ।
देवीं सरस्वतीं व्यासं ततो जयमुदीरयेत् ॥ ४ ॥
I offer my humble obeisances to Narayan and Nara (Arjun), unto Devi Saraswati, unto Vyasa by whose mercy the entire Vedic history known as Jaya became known to the world.
This shloka appears as the first shloka of Mahabharat. It also appears in Bhagavata Purana at 1.2.4.
Bhagavad Gita: Chapter 10, Verse 37
वृष्णीनां वासुदेवोऽस्मि पाण्डवानां धनञ्जय: |
vṛiṣhṇīnāṁ vāsudevo ’smi pāṇḍavānāṁ dhanañjayaḥ
Translation
BG 10.37: Amongst the descendants of Vrishni, I am Krishna, and amongst the Pandavas I am Arjun.
Ye he asali mahabharat ekdam right bataya he
Excellent very glad to hear that right version of Mahabharata
A must listen for everyone!
Yeah it's actually interesting 🤔
Shuka was son of Vedavyass. Thank you for sharing ❤
I love this podcast time ka pata hi nhi chala . ❤
Everyone have two eyes, but not everyone can see the same, perspective towards understanding will matter accordingly they wanted to see !
agar karna arjun se kamjor hota to bhagvan shri krishna arjun ko nihattey karna ko marne k lie nahi kehtey aur chal sai indra uska kavach nahi lekey jata uske sath bhot galat hua tha
@@amazingtop1040 Karn was near immortal with his Kavach Kundal. Therefore, taking away his Kavach Kundal was necessary.
@@imfuture7543to vo karn ki galti thi kya kavach or kundal hona
@@jatsanjay319 Nhi.. Karn ki glti nhi thi...... Mai sirf itna bol rha hu ki use mara nhi ja skta tha isliye indradeva ne use wapas maang liya
@@jatsanjay319 wo koi apni kabiliyat se nahi mila tha. Kunti ne suryadev se karn k liye Manga tha.
Krishna ne kishi ko nhi khtm Kia , Jo jeeta wo bhi Krishna jo Hara wo bhi Krishna . Hr Kan me Narayan ❤. To Jeet haar to ek hi ka hua wo the Krishna ❤❤❤
now i know all the truth thanks for this podast
Arjuna the greatest warrior ever 🙏🙏🙏 he is my inspiration ❤️❤️❤️❤️
All heros/winners => glory are always inspirational
❤
He is my role model too 😉
You are right bro, Arjun was my motivation for ever ❤❤❤
Jo Shri krishna ke best friend h, shiv ji ne khud jise blessing di ho, Devraj Indra jise Swarg me invite Kiya ho & Hanuman ji jiske protector ho, wo taarif ke kabil to hoga hi na.
Amazing conversation and truth about Maharashtra 🙏🚩
it's fabulous history 👌🏽👍🏽
Beautifully told as a story 😅
Wonderful podcast....I didn't knew half of it and change my prospective completely. That's the reason why learning from a intellectual peoson.
Her enthusiasm is so refreshing.
In galafehmiyon ke peeche ek pustak ka bahut bada haath hai, Ranjit Desai ki pustak "Mrityunjay".
वाह बेटी आपकी ज्ञान की बाते, बहुत अच्छा लगा। में, नेपाल कि राजधानी काठमाण्डु से हुँ, में, भीमसेन की जो दुस्री पत्नी हिडिम्बा थी उनका बेटा घटोच कच का। बेटा बार्वरीक का वंशज हुँ आपकी अध्ययन को मेँ, बहुत ईज्जत करता हूँ। आज भी हम हमारे परदादा बर्वरिक के सीरको मंदिर बनाकर रख्खे हैं, और आज तक हम कूल देवता के रूप में मानते हैं, हम अपने बिधिके अनुशार पुजा करते हैं, आइएगा तो। आपको प्रमाण मिलेगा हाँ। सभिको ज्ञान नहीं है जो वहाँ पुजारी हैं उनको भी पता नहीं है, जानने कि ईच्छा हो। आपको तो हमसे मिल्के जान सकते हैं, 🙏💐🌺🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
Awesome work ❤
बहोत ही खुबसुरत सिख मिली है सिस्टर आपका बहोत बहोत धन्यवाद
This whole video is only for people who didn't know anything!
But those who read and learn from past 10 years , knowledge she had shared is okay not vast not perfect, but okay for future generation!
Ghanta
she had to cover everything in few minutes. not that she can't go in detail
Big fan of Amiji 🙏
Ami Ganatra is amazing both in terms of depth of knowledge and the way she explains! Karna has been over glamorized by recent books and serials. Yes, some injustices happened to him but he himself justified many more wrongs!
Do introduce the guest to the audience and their hold on the subject
thanx for corect info..sanatana dharma ki jai
Justifying Dronacharya's act of demanding Eklavya's thumb is pure evil .. and Dronacharya faced karma as he died in war by cheating .. and his son cursed forever. That is the moral of the story intended by Vyas.
Eklavya ne bhi Karan ki tarah guru se bina puche sikhasa li thi
Aaj aap kisi private teacher ki khud ki likhi hui book jisse vo apne khud ke students ko sikha rahe us me se chori se sikhoge to uske man me bhi aapke liye gussa hi aayega
Arjun Dronacharya ka favourite students tha fir bhi usse narayanastra ka gyan nahi diya tha to Arjun ruka nahi usne aur bhi kai guru se sabhi divyastra ke gyan liye jisme sammohan astra ka to Dronacharya ke paas bhi koi tod nahi tha
Per Dronacharya ne bhi galti ki aur unhone adharm ka sath diya isliye vo bhi mare gaye aur Drustdym ne unke head ke bal pakkad ke unka head kat diya tha jo usnka apman hi tha
The podcast was really amazing 🎉
But Akshit bhaiya, beech beech me interrupt mt kiya kariye 😢
Poora flow bigad jata hai
Baaki it was really amazing 😍
bilkul sahi
Big fan of Ami ganata mam ♥️🫶🫶🫶🫶
Matlab tum andhbhakt ho 🤣
@@RajeshDas-tf7qzidar koi bhi tumari bhakth ki bhat nahi kar rahe ho😂😂😂 oo satya ki bhakt ho...
@@GVA369 ????
@@RajeshDas-tf7qzsehi bola 😂😂😂
@@GVA369 1. Karn ke Sarpmukhi ban se Sri Krishna ne Arjun ko bachaya
2. Foot Soldiers Arjun mardeta agar Sri Krishna nhi hota to
3. Shrutyudha ke gadha ke prahar se bhi bachaya
4. Bhagdutt ke Vaishnavastra bhi bachaya Arjun
To bhai Apke Ami gantra ji Asab q nhi explain kar rha hai 🤣🤣🤣🤣
About the first portion of the podcast, Kunti Devi really told Krishna, & it is really true because it mentioned on the Bhagavatam Mahapuran ( Mahabharat & Bhagavatam both are written by
Maharshi Krishna Dvaipayana Vedavyasa :
SB 1.8.25
विपद: सन्तु ता: शश्वत्तत्र तत्र जगद्गुरो ।
भवतो दर्शनं यत्स्यादपुनर्भवदर्शनम् ॥ २५ ॥
vipadaḥ santu tāḥ śaśvat
tatra tatra jagad-guro
bhavato darśanaṁ yat syād
apunar bhava-darśanam
Synonyms
vipadaḥ - calamities; santu - let there be; tāḥ - all; śaśvat - again and again; tatra - there; tatra - and there; jagat-guro - O Lord of the universe; bhavataḥ - Your; darśanam - meeting; yat - that which; syāt - is; apunaḥ - not again; bhava-darśanam - seeing repetition of birth and death.
Translation
I wish that all those calamities would happen again and again so that we could see You again and again, for seeing You means that we will no longer see repeated births and deaths.
No.
Here is what that verse is about:
The verse 1.8.25 from the Śrīmad Bhāgavatam is a part of the prayers offered by Queen Kunti to Lord Krishna. Queen Kunti is a central figure in the Mahabharata, and she is known for her deep devotion to Lord Krishna. In this chapter, she is expressing her heartfelt devotion and admiration for Krishna, recognizing Him as the Supreme Divine.
The verse 1.8.25 in Sanskrit is as follows:
विषान्महाग्नेः पुरुषाददर्शनादसात्सभाया वनवासकृच्छ्रतः ।
मृधे मृधे ऽनेकमहारथास्त्रतो द्रौण्यस्त्रतश्चास्म हरेऽभिरक्षिताः ॥
Translation (by A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada):
"My dear Krishna, Your Lordship has protected us from a poisoned cake, from a great fire, from cannibals, from the vicious assembly, from sufferings during our exile in the forest and from the battle where great generals fought. And now You have saved us from the weapon of Ashvatthama."
In this verse, Queen Kunti is recounting the various life-threatening dangers that she and her family faced, and she is expressing her gratitude to Lord Krishna for protecting them in each of these situations. She acknowledges Krishna’s divine protection and expresses her unwavering faith in Him.
This verse highlights the theme of divine protection and the grace that the Lord bestows upon His devotees, which is a recurring theme in the Bhagavata Purana. Queen Kunti’s prayers are often cited as an example of pure devotion and surrender to God.
❤
Achchha hai aise log saamne aa rhe h aur myths/galat depictions ko burst kr rhe hai... 🙂
अद्भुत अकल्पनीय अविश्वसनीय है
Wonderful discussion
Rashmirathi, Mrityunjay, Tv serials main reason for this Misinterpretation and Now people are so blinded that they even ready to say that Vyaas Mahabharat is not the only one, ye unka perspective tha and like bhai ye hai kaliyug where adharmis like Ravana and Karna get praised 👍
VRISHA ka matlab pataa hai ??
@sigma_01460 However, though that spear has now gone, I swear to you truthfully that he is incapable of being killed by anyone. He is devoted to brahmanas. He is truthful. He has engaged in austerities. He is devoted to his vows. He is compassionate towards his enemies. It is for these reasons that Karna is known as Vrisha
@sigma_01460 jiss insaan se sabse jyada knowledge milti ho inhone usse ravan se compare kar diya 👀👀
dekh rahe ho bhai kaise ye log rakchas ko insaan se compare kar rahe hai
arjun ne itne kaand kiye inko wo nahi dikhta lekin karn ne wo baat bol di jo ki rules main hai or thoda gusse main tha toh hass diya ye log usko badhaa chadha kar dikhate hai khud nahi batayenge arjun kaisa tha pandavas kaise thee unke bhi karname aise hi thee
@@BHARAT_3433agaya andha karna bhakta sab dekhna ka baad jo karna ko support Kara wo rapist aur murder sa Kam nhi Moder day terrorist 😂
@sigma_01460exactly it's kalyug so people's like u exist in satyayug devil and it's supporters both didn't exist 😂
I heard that after eklavya lost his right thumb, he started practicing with left hand, so he was called the left handed warrior
No, according to mahabharat eklavya continued to practice with his right hand but could not shoot arrows with same amount of skill as before . In entire mahabharat only arjun could shoot with both hands with equal skill ( hence he was given the name savyasachi)
@@aashutoshgoswami344 ok
@@drshrikantab2340and it was Dronacharya himself who pointed out Eklavya to use his two fingers index and middle finger to shoot the arrow.
( द्रोणाचार्य ने इशारे से एकलव्य को बताया कि कैसे तर्जनी और मध्यमा अंगुली की सहायता से बाण चलाया जाता है).
Superb ami maam, no words how to thank you
Keep doing this good work
May God bless you ❤❤❤
It feels more soothing the more I learn about my deities. Jai Satya Sanatan.
Brother please make a video on Bhavishyamalika 🙏🏻🙏🏻
Its a humble request...
Share it as much as you can to aware maximum people
🤔that is if we know who to send 😁
Amazing , thanks for creating this.
Excellent Analysis 🙏🕉️🙏
Are bhai inhone to sonyputra karn ki dhoti khol di😂😂😂
Sahi baat hai..😂
Bhai serial me nahi dekhta kyuki mujhe pta hai usme fiction jyada hai entertainment ke liye 😊
agar karna arjun se kamjor hota to bhagvan shri krishna arjun ko nihattey karna ko marne k lie nahi kehtey aur chal sai indra uska kavach nahi lekey jata uske sath bhot galat hua tha
@@mayankindian3750 agar karna arjun se kamjor hota to bhagvan shri krishna arjun ko nihattey karna ko marne k lie nahi kehtey aur chal sai indra uska kavach nahi lekey jata uske sath bhot galat hua tha
@userifykyk to liya to chal se tha na aur karna ne khud se vo de bhi diya
This episode of Kunti praying to Lord Krishna is in Srimad Bhagavatha Mahapurana. It is not folklore. It is part of purana, though the episode is not part of Vyasa Mahabharata.
Dekho bro jo puran likhe gye vo bhakto dwara likhe gye apne parambrambh ke gungaan me
2. Jo puran hai vo history nhi hai hamare bharat ki usme bhot saari katho ka sangrah hai jisme jiwan jine ka dhang bataya gya hai aur bhot chote chote point bataye gye hai jisse bhot kuch sikhne ko milta hai BUT
Jo ramayan aur mahabharat hain vo hamri history hai (jisme bhot milawat ho chuki hai foreign invaders ke dwara) bahut kam hi महाभारत और रामायण aapko genuine milenge usme se sabse sudh geetapress ka kha jata hai to Ye hamari history hai simple😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊
@@soul_dragger9998 Srimad Bhagavatha Mahapurana was written by Veda Vyasa only. I am only saying that the episode of Kunti praying to Lord Krishna is in Srimad Bhagavatha and this episode is not folklore per se.
srimad bhagwat mahapuran is an itihasa. its written closely in almost the same timeline of mahabharata by the same author... Maharishi Veda Vyasa. Its the first authentic itihasa scripture to tell us about the life of Shri Krishna, followed by the garga samhita.@@soul_dragger9998
@@KM-vi2bkbhai unhone bhakti bhaav se mana nahi Kiya hai ki galat hai suno toh sahi se lekin vo ye keh rhi ki usko leftist apni baate banane ke liye use karte unpar dhyan nahi dena hai
@@SOHAN_SINGH111 I am only clarifying and correcting that the episode of Kunti praying to Lord Krishna is in Srimad Bhagavatha Mahapurana and it is not folklore..Folklore means myth or some cooked up story..Whereas puranas are not all myth or all mithya per se. Also, Vyasa Mahabharata and Valmiki Ramayana are full of bhakti bhava. Whether one likes it or not doesn't matter at all. Both the ithihasas are not only just ' as it happened' but also full of bhakti bhavana also. The beauty of Ithihasas is that they are wonderful from all angles..Hindu Ithihasas and Bhakti can't be looked in isolation completely. So, one can't separate out bhakti from any of the Hindu scriptures, because the ultimate goal of every Hindu is Moksha which can attained only through proper bhakti and self surrender to Supreme Lord.
I have been following you since your first video. 😊 though I don't know why but RUclips stopped showing me your videos
Example Achha Hone Ka 😂
1) Daanvir
2) Vijaydhanush Ka Ek Baar Use
3) Raaj ka Laalchh Nhi
4) Kabhi Apne Mittar Ko Ni Choda
5) Dharam Nhi Choda
6) Jeewan Mein Kabhi Kisi Se Kuch Maaga Ni
You are right bro according to Bhagwan krishna :
कुण्डलाभ्यां निमायाथ दिव्येन कवचेन च । तां प्राप्यामन्यत वृषा सततं त्वां हतं रणे ॥२२॥
एवं गतेऽपि शक्योऽयं हन्तुं नान्येन केनचित् ।
ऋते त्वा पुरुषव्याघ्र शपे सत्येन चानघ ॥२३॥ ब्रह्मण्यः सत्यवादी च तपस्वी नियतव्रतः । रिपुष्वपि दयावांश्च तस्मात्कर्णो वृषा स्मृतः ॥२४॥
Meaning:
I swear to you truthfully that he is incapable of being killed by anyone other than you. He is devoted to brahmanas. He is truthful. He has engaged in austerities. He is devoted to his vows. He is compassionate towards his enemies. It is for these reasons that Karna is known as Vrisha.
LOL😂😂😂😂
Kunti को आग मे जलाने की योजना शकुनी दुर्योधन के साथ
श्री कृष्न को बंदी बनाने की कोशिश शकुनी दुर्योधन के साथ
द्रौपदी के वस्त्र haran करने का आदेश सभी लोगों के सामने
इंद्र से vashvi शक्ति मांगने के लिए गिड़गिड़ाना और नहीं देने पर कवच ना देने के लिए कहना
दुर्योधन को बार बार अकेला छोड़कर भाग जाना
अर्जुन से हमेशा जलते रहना
According to वेद व्यास महाभारत 😂😂😂😂
1.Siksha ki bikh kisne mangi
2. Adharm ma sath diya duryodhan ka sath dekar
3. Raaj ka lalach tha isliye duryodhan ke sath yudhh lada.
4. Daanvir to tha hi aur budhhihi. Bhi tha 😂😂😂
5. Kabhi apne mitra ko nhi chhoda adharmi ka sath dene me ??😂😂😂
Achha siksha ke adhikar mangna bhikh ho gaya 😂😂😂
Han bhai tum jese murkh or kya hi logic de sakte ho @@shubh_chandrakar9334
1. Danveer: But traded the Kavach Kundal with Vasawi Shakti since he knew he couldn't kill Arjun without it.
2. Vijay dhanush: Nothing special, still lost to Bhima while having Vijay Dhanush.
3. Raaj ka laalach nhi: Still accepted a free gift -- Kingdom of Anga
4. Kabhi Apne Mitra ko nhi chhoda: he fled away from Gandharva, leaving Duryodhana alone.
5. Dharam nhi chhoda: wanted to show off wealth to someone who is spending live in Forest as a punishment.
6. Jeewan mein kabhi kisi se kuchh maanga nhi: Asked Brahmastra from Guru Drona
Very good describe bahutt bahut accha aapne story nahi balki ek bahut accha masg diya last me bhi thanks a lot.
She has some strong conviction in whatever she says...hands down
very informative, loved the podcast
Please dedicate one episode on BHAVISHYA PURAAN!
amazing!!! thanks mam for debunking the myths
Bilkul shi bataya karn ke bare me.
Even ki pichle Janam me rakshas tha, Sahastra Bahu
Mere jhoot k Jale jhad diye mam ne 😅. Apki jitni prashansa kru km hai mam ❤
Fantastic 🙏🙏
Love it❤❤
Excellent information on karan. And his clan. How Mahabharata was told.
I like Karan now i am starting to think what is Karan 🤣
She’s just spewed a bunch of nonsense on Karan without any basis or evidence .. it’s just her own personal interpretation
but expert people know this normal peoples don't know when they realise what the expert is saying true then they feel embarrassed they have humble themselves before that happens otherwise embarrassment is something we have to face when we mess with experts
@@Cloudxchangenope.. She has read Vedvyas original Mahabharat book. Have you read that?
In the BORI Critical Edition (CE) of the Mahabharata, there is no mention that Karna received any formal training from Dronacharya, even in his early years. This particular narrative of Karna receiving initial training from Drona and later advanced training from Parashurama is found in later versions or regional retellings of the Mahabharata, but it is not present in the BORI CE, which aims to provide the most authentic and earliest version of the text by removing later interpolations.
Kunti ji ka jeevan mein dukh maangna satya hai! Ye cheez ka varnan bhagwat mahapuran mein milta hai jab vo bhagwan krishn ki stuti krti hain! I really like ami ganatra ji and love listening to her podcast unko ramayan Mahabharata ki bahaut knowledge hai but abhi unhe purano ke baare mein itna nhi pata!
Thank u for enlightening us about Karan. I just wanted to state that Karan childhood and his fate should also be counted for and his spirit of continuing his life should also be kept accounted for
Vaiya , Please make podcast with Rajarshi Nandy sir.
Karn was demon in past life..and narkasur within him as Karn...as per real Mahabharata by ved vyasji maharaj
Arjun was telented warrior.He is inspiration. Jo Shri krishna ke best friend h, shiv ji ne khud jise blessing di ho, Devraj Indra jise Swarg me invite Kiya ho & Hanuman ji jiske protector ho, wo taarif ke kabil to hoga hi na.
Mujhe to ye vhe short lg rahe h itnna mja aaya.great knowledge
✨🔥BHOT ACCHA LAGA APSE SATYA SUNKE MEM
Kitna dwesh leke baitha ye Duryodhan. Apni poori family barbad kardi.
Ye hi reason hai why this is part of pur culture to educate us and make us understand the consequences of hatered, ego, everything. This is the result if u keep burning in the fire of jealousy and hatered.
Thanks for this episode. M here to listen to Ami ma'am ❤
Very helpful!!!👍
She is 110 percent every point is true if any person who is able to read can verify it ❤
I like this topic.. my favorite mahabharat
Aap ko sat sat pronam .
Khan sir needs to see this podcast.
Why?? What did he said??
🤔👍🏽👌🏽😅
Karna etna achhi to then why he don’t entry in heaven?
@@megharajbinnal8126mahabharat yudh main jitne bhi log mare the wo heaven main gye the or jo jinda rh gye the pandavs wo hell gye the sirf dhratrastrya heaven gye the
Who said he don't enter in heaven I heard who die in battle field they go to heaven 😊
I am sorry Ami ji reels ko sach man k apko galat samjhe log... Mein apni aur sabki aur se, apse kshama mangti hu... Mein bhi kayi baar apki baat se disagree thi par ab sach samjh aya ki asal me hua kya tha aur hume darshaya kya gaya.... Shukriya Ami ji ye facts sabke samne lane k liye....
TV serial walon ne dimag kharab karke Rakha hai 😂
Ami Ganatre "always loved listening to her " ❤❤
Inka unka bahut sun liya ab bas book padh ke khud confirm karna padega
She is the only person...wo actually...says fact....❤
This lady won my respect once more... literally every point she said are absolutely true.... people need to READ Mahabharat, Ramayan and other Granthas properly and never trust the propaganda
The story about kunthi praying Krishna for more troubles is TRUE. It is mentioned in Bhagavatha mahapuranam written by sri.veda Vyasji himself.
It goes like this...
vipadah santhu nah shashwath thatra thatra jagadguro....
It is in first skandha, 8th chapter, 25th shloka.
This shows the pinnacle of Bhakthi kunthi had attained and is a lesson for us to reach that state of surrender.
SO, TO DISCUSS OUR SACRED. GREAT HINDU SCRIPTURES, MAKE SURE TO HAVE
PEOPLE WHO HAVE READ OUR SCRIPTURES EXTENSIVELY AND WITH KNOWLEDGE OF OUR DIVINE GREAT LANGUAGE SAMSKRIT (not sanskrit). They should have read the scriptures themselves instead of reading translations by half baked people. Nowadays it has become a fashion to discuss our holy scriptures with people with nil knowledge. Hope the point is driven home. We hindus don't have 'sar tan se juda' culture.
In purana not in mahabharata. History is mahabharata rest written in praise of gods and may be a history but purana include many local stories as well
@@lokendermathur9566
Puranas are also written by veda vyasa. Science in encrypted in the narration. We people don't understand that. The whole picture can be understood ONLY with extensive study of puranas and not just some parts here and there or hearsay. What is untold in one scripture will be found in another.
So , to discuss our sacred scriptures , it is better to invite people who are well read and understood the concepts.
Shakuni ka character sach me bohot accha play kia tha mahabharat me. Akshit ne bhi kaha "mamaji ki baat krte h"😂 Mamaji ya "bhanje" sunte hi shakuni ki yaad to aa jati h.
Lalu ji Shakuni ke langde hone ki kahani sachi hai ki nhi btao
bohot hi bdiya ami ganatra ji