I believe most people only pay attention to FPS, but it's interesting to note that the 5700x generally has about 20% more usage than the 5800x3d, yet with a lower temperature. Cyberpunk is an excellent example of this. It demonstrates that not only does the 5700x deliver similar frame rates in similar scenarios, but it also stays cooler, requiring a more affordable thermal solution.
Exactly why I went for the 5700x. I was concerned about my nve HDD overheating and I can just drop this thing in and it should be around the same spec. No performance gain when your whole system starts throttling.
Before the usual bitter people start complaining, FOR ME the comparison makes sense because it represents the case of many ordinary people, who have doubts if buying an AMD processor with 3D Cache will see increased performance in their games. favorites regarding an R5 5600/5600X/R7 5700X/5800X and having things or plan to buy like the RX 6700XT, RTX 3060ti, RTX 3070, etc. as GPUs. It is clear that IN THAT CASE/IN THAT CONTEXT it is not necessary to jump to a Ryzen 5000+Cache 3D, unless you get a much more powerful GPU and it is urgent to have many more fps on the screen.
it makes far more to sense to lower setting and see its possible max performance and then research what card you want to buy to see if there would be a potential bottle neck, knowing the limit of a cpu is far more useful and is what a cpu bechmark should be, you should never have a gpu bottle neck in a cpu benchmark it just doesn't make sense.
@@igudeng2595 ....I have already said it, just as the comparison has done, it does make sense because it is aimed at the common people, the comparison is not oriented for that small group of people obsessed with Bottlenecks, with performance down to the last drop that the CPUs, the comparison is not directed towards the "Widows of the Benchmark at 720p". Furthermore, all those people obsessed with that type of Comparisons, are apparently the ones who change Hardware faster than the average user, they claim to be the users who buy "long term" and in reality they are the "Eraly Adopters and Beta-Testers" as always, just to stay in the Main Wave of Consumption. Remember that Steam users and similar users DO NOT represent the ENTIRE Gamer Universe on PC (much less those who consider themselves "Master Race"), in the end they are still a tiny, noisy group wanting to have "visibility", but a very small group at the end of the day. Therefore, this comparison is very useful for the type of user it is aimed at, which are those with this type of CPU or similar and who have graphics like the RTX 3070, but who are also not considering changing GPUs; and decide whether or not it is necessary to change the CPU, as easy and simple as that.
@@juanmassiosare9850 I ain’t reading allat it’s not a matter of being obsessed with bottlenecks it’s about make sure you’re getting the performance for the money you’re spending, it’s the reason why this account doesn’t have many subs lol it’s a objectively worse test
@@igudeng2595 ....I don't care if this channel has many or few subscribers, it has been good enough for someone like you to stop by here to leave your comments, one would assume that you are a person who is too busy in your daily life and playing with your high-end hardware or making comparisons for yourself instead of criticizing others, right? HAHAHA * Better invest your time in looking for comparisons at 720p, so that you have peace of mind for a few minutes in your fucking life. lol What you don't quite understand because of how stubborn you are, is that people with an RTX 3070 and similar and with a processor like the 5700X/5800X, even the 5600/5600X/i5 12400 etc., do not find it necessary to change to a 5800X3D, neither the 5700X3D, nor the 5500X3D, not for this type of use and reality.
@juanmassiosare9850 most people on steam use a 1060 or 1660 though, so your just being dumb acting like they constantly change parts on there pc, steam users are a majority of people who play games on there pc anyway, only a smaller amount use gog. This is a pretty bad cpu test and all it would show anyone thinking about buying a pc is that a 3d runs slightly cooler, which might be the only actual difference since most pc parts are a scam, but games don't use your cpu as much as gpu, so anyone who needs something for processor intensive tasks wouldn't have an actual benchmark to base they're decision on.
Hey, it's not fake! Stupid? Absolutely. But not fake! Most runs the GPU was too close to 100% usage, so it's unlikely the CPU was the bottleneck. Therefore stupid, but not fake.
@@otaviotisikawa2594 Dude, you really need to study a little about how a pc works Gpu around 95-99% is at limit mostly times, than the test is only about RTX 3070, not the cpus. And I will tell one more thing: this channel is pure fake, I bet he doens't even have 5700x or 58003d to test, he is just changing the sensor name at afterbunner then increasing/decreasing his GPU TDP to make some fps diference. Its a fake channel
Great video. Made me happy I chose 5700X because my assumptions were true.. the 5700X runs 4-5C cooler than the 5800X3D and for me the differences is not that great besides maybe the 1% lows stability. I have just had to undervolt my 5700X because it was constantly hitting max temps at 95-96C with stock cooler so now it is running about 22% slower in performance but have been able to maintain around 80-82C which is much better than before using Ryzen Master 3600MHz and 1.01875V. Well worth to prevent CPU Overheating crashing especially in the hot Australian Summer weather. Yeah I was contemplating a 5700X to 5700X3D upgrade but honestly I think I am in the sweetspot and I game at 4k.
how is that even possible??? You should buy a decent cooler my friend..... decent coolers dont cost much you can find coolers in the 35$ range that are awesome.... I use upscaling from 2k to 4k and my 5700x runs at 58 degrees celsius.... My cpu runs at +200mhz so it boosts to 4.8ghz with an undervolt of -28 all cores. I have not seen it once go over 68 degrees at max.... But i also have a golden sample... I dont have a water cooler just a simple Thermalright U120EX REV. 4... just invest a couple of bucks thermalright peerless assassin or something inexpensive....
My guy. You can't compare 2 different cpus when your gpu is the bottleneck for both of them. On top of that, the games are supposed to be on lower detail so it's more cpu dependent.
I've got the same GPU but with a 5800X3D and I'll guarantee that 5700x is a bottleneck if you play something like Cyberpunk with RT on. Sure for a lot of games there won't be much difference but newer titles and those with intensive RT certainly benefit from the extra cache
3 месяца назад+1
@@carllavery4442 nah getting 90+ fps on cyber no issues the game got dlls3.5 man
1080p? I'm playing at 1440p and went from a 5700G (which in turn has less cache than the 5700X) to the 5800X3D and at the same settings the gap in performance was huge
Thanks for this test i just upgraded my r5 3600 to the 5700x and this removes my buyers remorse. The x3d is very case specific and am glad to see some real world case scenario's
@@infiniteops820 Think I got 5-10% in palworld @ 4k and cyberpunk was negligible. I upgraded the ram also recently so not much else to compare to.The chip runs cooler though so I was able to reduce case temps and noise. If I had the money to buy into am5 then I would consider the x3d more closely
Thx for the test. I rather will buy 5700x+2tb nvme ssd then 5800x3d only. I have same GPU and as i see there is no even 15-20% fps increase but price difference is x2
@@W_Woland_W Я до сих пор не понимаю стоит ли менять 3600 на 5700х или разницы особо не будет? Щас у меня одна вебкамера в обс отнимает 10% процессора. Будет ли разница 1 и 0.1%. Рассматривал 5800x3d, но стоит он 28к, вместо 13-14к за 5700х + вмести с ним можно будет взять ссд на 2тб.
@@SIKSOF для стримов конечно 5800х3д. смысл менять 3600 и 4600 есть:) 5000 линейка намного имбовее. 5700х вполне подойдет 5700х оптимальный вариант. 5800х3д топ
@@SIKSOF ну еще надо оперативку чтоб 3800 или 4000 тянула. если проц потянет. у меня 5800х3д только 3800 могет тянуть изза инфинитифабрик. но я разогнал его по шине. сам проц
@@W_Woland_W 4600? Как я тебе его в компьютер вставлю? Да и смысла больше 3600-3800мгц для райзенов 3 и 5 поколения нет, там уже тайминги важнее, а 5800X3D ему вообще пофиг на разгон оперативы из-за большого кеша. Что за дизинфу ты пишешь?
@@Crashed131963 "You think someone can spot more smoothness with the human eye after 60fps?" I think so. "RDR2 looked smooth on my Ps4 at 1080p/30fps" I feel sorry for you.
@@zsoltritzl6978 Gets worst, every ps4 game I ever played did not look choppy to me . Now with my Ps5 at 60fps I sure can't say 60 looks 2X smoother than 30 .
Wtf, why u testing the processor with all games in high settings on a rtx 3070 ? All games using 99% of gpu on this settings. You need to test in low settings or in a better gpu!
Oh my God, when you want to render numbers between 2 processors you want the graphics details as low as possible so that the processor is forced to run at the highest draw calls it can,the test is wrong, basically what you are doing is having " crippled" the 0.1/1% fps of the 5800x3d with the result that the avgs are lower.
Dang. chill, your attitude isn't gonna motivate the person to redo the test. And it's not a useless test, it's just not optimal for you. Many people don't game on the lowest possible settings so the test is good for most people.. this test represents a more realistic use case.
the test was very helpful. especially since many people are using mid-range GPUs. a 5800x3d only makes a difference in most games with an rtx4070 / rx6800xt or higher, or in games that are extremely cpu-heavy. I have a rx6800 which is between a rtx3060ti and rtx3070 and in my case a cpu upgrade makes no sense especially in 1440p.
LOL, according to this "benchmark" the 5800x3d with a price tag of $350 is only at best around 5% better than the $165 5700x? Something ain't making sense here.....🤣🤣🤣
As far as I know, the Streaming would be done by your RTX 3070, so the R5 5600X can take care of its work for video games and other tasks that are in the background (including your communication with other players and your audience). It is advisable to have a good processor with more Cores/more Threads for these matters of Streaming/Video Editing/Rendering etc., but already having the R5 5600X I would not see the need to change anything. If you have not yet bought that R5 5600/5600X and your budget can fit the R7 5700X, buy the latter if you consider it appropriate.
@@juanmassiosare9850 Right, well, I'm currently deciding between the 5600x, 5700x and 5800x, even if I'm less likely to buy the latter because of its price. So if I've understood correctly, the RTX 3070 will be able to handle streaming and gaming at the same time, while my processor takes care of the rest?
@@Lucaasaas ...In fact, the RTX 3070, similar or higher GPU could not only give you a good service when playing and streaming at the same time, but it would allow you to record your gameplay with Nvidia Shadowplay, that is, you can stream taking advantage of the NVEC of the Nvidia graphics, instead of using your Processor. Nvidia Shadowplay. ruclips.net/video/XQT-h4wITXw/видео.html * Some prefer to "play defensively" and transmit at 720p and others "play offensively" because they do it at 1080p. It would be a matter of trying with each game, to see what is more comfortable for you in the end. - Nvidia NVENC. ruclips.net/video/bpoDanWJ4Cw/видео.html If you were a simple player who is not interested in recording gameplay or streaming, I would tell you that the Ryzen 5 5600 is enough (usually cheaper than the R5 5600X), the same with an Intel i5 12400/12400F, but economically You can afford it, whether or not you do Streaming/Recording/Video Editing, without a doubt the ideal CPU would be the Ryzen 7 5700X. The Ryzen 7 5700X has practically the same performance as the Ryzen 7 5800X, but usually costing less, consuming less power and generating less heat than the 5800X, and in recent months the R7 5700X has been seen at a price closer to the R5 5600 /5600X, so it sounds more interesting, especially because of your user profile. In the same way, I will tell you that 16GB RAM/2x8GB (DDR4 in this case) is enough for most normal players, but for those who want something more (on a whim) or for those who really have more advanced uses (apart from playing) It would be advisable to have 32GB/2x16GB or 4x8GB, so you should take advantage of the fact that DDR4 ram is still cheap. * For the Ryzen 5000, DDR4 ram at 3600Mhz and CL16 is good, there are models at 3600Mhz/CL18 that are not bad, but the ideal would be CL16 (DDR4 3600Mhz/CL18 has a performance close to DDR4 3200Mhz/CL16). If your budget allows it, if you want the best performance now at the best possible price and if you are interested in configuring a Platform with more Future than the Intel-1200 socket, AMD-AM4 and even the Intel-1700 socket, you will I would recommend looking towards Socket AM5 for the Ryzen 7000 and DDR5 ram. In this case, at least I would think of a Ryzen 5 7600/7600X (6 cores/12 threads but with Zen3 microarchitecture), which costs much less than a Ryzen 7 5800X3D and barely more than a Ryzen 7 5800X and not much more than a Ryzen 7 5700X; The Ryzen 5 7600/7600X have similar performance to an Intel i5 13600K and their performance is more consistent than that of the Ryzen 7 5800X3D (COSTING LESS). The problem with the Ryzen 7000 is the cost of the MoBo socket AM5 and the DDR5 ram; As for the MoBo, I would be interested in one with a B650 chipset and as for the ram, it would be good to reach 2x16GB DDR5-6000MHz EXPO version (more efficient for AMD), if not at least 5600Mhz or thereabouts. As a CPU-Cooler I would recommend the Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 SE, as it has very good performance and is usually cheaper than other options. It will serve you well for the Ryzen 5000 and 7000 (and Intel CPUs). www.amazon.com/Thermalright-Peerless-Assassin-120-Cooler/dp/B09LGY38L4?th=1 ruclips.net/video/Mm4hyIHe1PM/видео.html .
@@pR0ManiacS I know, I know amd's prices and what they're worth, but in terms of streaming you can't say that AMD equals Nvidia, I'd really like to, but that's not the case, the encoding of Nvidia's graphics cards is much better than AMD's.
alguien por favor me recomienden por favor miren esto estos 3 precesadores puedo comprarme osea cual me puedo dicen ustedes--- el ryzen 7 8700F ryzen 7 5700X ryzen 7 5600X3d A ESTO AGREGO QUE LA GRAFICA ES UNA 4070 SUPER, que ya la tengo... alguien me aconseja cual procesador me combiene con esa grafica... gracias por leerme
It's strange that the difference between the two processors is so small, even in the competitive game Apex Legends. The accuracy of the test does not appear to be reliable.
You think someone can spot more smoothness with the human eye after 40 fps? RDR2 and Witchers 3 looked smooth on my Ps4 at 1080p/30fps when I played them . Movies and TV are shown at 24 fps .
@@NimbleFPS you're totally wrong. Go talking to a specialist. You're a not a robot... 120hz+ screen are pure marketing. It's smoother yes but just that. It's an adequation between screen and GPU. Just that. One eye is 60-70hz max. It's just...NATURE. Sorry.
I believe most people only pay attention to FPS, but it's interesting to note that the 5700x generally has about 20% more usage than the 5800x3d, yet with a lower temperature. Cyberpunk is an excellent example of this. It demonstrates that not only does the 5700x deliver similar frame rates in similar scenarios, but it also stays cooler, requiring a more affordable thermal solution.
That might be due to some games preferring higher clocks and since the 5800x3d is clocked lower it might resort to using more cores
@@igudeng2595that makes 0 sense
Cyberpunk is gpu bound game dipthong
Exactly why I went for the 5700x. I was concerned about my nve HDD overheating and I can just drop this thing in and it should be around the same spec.
No performance gain when your whole system starts throttling.
Im glad that i bought 5700x for 165$. I could buy 5800x3d for 300$!!!
Before the usual bitter people start complaining, FOR ME the comparison makes sense because it represents the case of many ordinary people, who have doubts if buying an AMD processor with 3D Cache will see increased performance in their games. favorites regarding an R5 5600/5600X/R7 5700X/5800X and having things or plan to buy like the RX 6700XT, RTX 3060ti, RTX 3070, etc. as GPUs.
It is clear that IN THAT CASE/IN THAT CONTEXT it is not necessary to jump to a Ryzen 5000+Cache 3D, unless you get a much more powerful GPU and it is urgent to have many more fps on the screen.
it makes far more to sense to lower setting and see its possible max performance and then research what card you want to buy to see if there would be a potential bottle neck, knowing the limit of a cpu is far more useful and is what a cpu bechmark should be, you should never have a gpu bottle neck in a cpu benchmark it just doesn't make sense.
@@igudeng2595 ....I have already said it, just as the comparison has done, it does make sense because it is aimed at the common people, the comparison is not oriented for that small group of people obsessed with Bottlenecks, with performance down to the last drop that the CPUs, the comparison is not directed towards the "Widows of the Benchmark at 720p".
Furthermore, all those people obsessed with that type of Comparisons, are apparently the ones who change Hardware faster than the average user, they claim to be the users who buy "long term" and in reality they are the "Eraly Adopters and Beta-Testers" as always, just to stay in the Main Wave of Consumption.
Remember that Steam users and similar users DO NOT represent the ENTIRE Gamer Universe on PC (much less those who consider themselves "Master Race"), in the end they are still a tiny, noisy group wanting to have "visibility", but a very small group at the end of the day.
Therefore, this comparison is very useful for the type of user it is aimed at, which are those with this type of CPU or similar and who have graphics like the RTX 3070, but who are also not considering changing GPUs; and decide whether or not it is necessary to change the CPU, as easy and simple as that.
@@juanmassiosare9850 I ain’t reading allat it’s not a matter of being obsessed with bottlenecks it’s about make sure you’re getting the performance for the money you’re spending, it’s the reason why this account doesn’t have many subs lol it’s a objectively worse test
@@igudeng2595 ....I don't care if this channel has many or few subscribers, it has been good enough for someone like you to stop by here to leave your comments, one would assume that you are a person who is too busy in your daily life and playing with your high-end hardware or making comparisons for yourself instead of criticizing others, right? HAHAHA
* Better invest your time in looking for comparisons at 720p, so that you have peace of mind for a few minutes in your fucking life. lol
What you don't quite understand because of how stubborn you are, is that people with an RTX 3070 and similar and with a processor like the 5700X/5800X, even the 5600/5600X/i5 12400 etc., do not find it necessary to change to a 5800X3D, neither the 5700X3D, nor the 5500X3D, not for this type of use and reality.
@juanmassiosare9850 most people on steam use a 1060 or 1660 though, so your just being dumb acting like they constantly change parts on there pc, steam users are a majority of people who play games on there pc anyway, only a smaller amount use gog. This is a pretty bad cpu test and all it would show anyone thinking about buying a pc is that a 3d runs slightly cooler, which might be the only actual difference since most pc parts are a scam, but games don't use your cpu as much as gpu, so anyone who needs something for processor intensive tasks wouldn't have an actual benchmark to base they're decision on.
Typical fake testing channel.
Hey, it's not fake! Stupid? Absolutely. But not fake! Most runs the GPU was too close to 100% usage, so it's unlikely the CPU was the bottleneck. Therefore stupid, but not fake.
@@otaviotisikawa2594 Dude, you really need to study a little about how a pc works
Gpu around 95-99% is at limit mostly times, than the test is only about RTX 3070, not the cpus.
And I will tell one more thing: this channel is pure fake, I bet he doens't even have 5700x or 58003d to test, he is just changing the sensor name at afterbunner then increasing/decreasing his GPU TDP to make some fps diference.
Its a fake channel
@@otaviotisikawa2594I want the game to consistently look good. If I want the game to look good then I don't need to upgrade the CPU. Good test
Great video. Made me happy I chose 5700X because my assumptions were true.. the 5700X runs 4-5C cooler than the 5800X3D and for me the differences is not that great besides maybe the 1% lows stability.
I have just had to undervolt my 5700X because it was constantly hitting max temps at 95-96C with stock cooler so now it is running about 22% slower in performance but have been able to maintain around 80-82C which is much better than before using Ryzen Master 3600MHz and 1.01875V.
Well worth to prevent CPU Overheating crashing especially in the hot Australian Summer weather.
Yeah I was contemplating a 5700X to 5700X3D upgrade but honestly I think I am in the sweetspot and I game at 4k.
how is that even possible??? You should buy a decent cooler my friend..... decent coolers dont cost much you can find coolers in the 35$ range that are awesome.... I use upscaling from 2k to 4k and my 5700x runs at 58 degrees celsius.... My cpu runs at +200mhz so it boosts to 4.8ghz with an undervolt of -28 all cores. I have not seen it once go over 68 degrees at max.... But i also have a golden sample... I dont have a water cooler just a simple Thermalright U120EX REV. 4... just invest a couple of bucks thermalright peerless assassin or something inexpensive....
TDP of 5700x is 65W, NOT 105W
turn pbo on and see ahahah
This guys obviouslly fake the entire test: just go in options of afterbunner and change cpu name
Its exactly what he did
The worst channel ever!
Say it to my 120w 5700x with pbo and 4.7ghz all core at full load
TDP isn’t real anymore especially on CPUs
My guy. You can't compare 2 different cpus when your gpu is the bottleneck for both of them. On top of that, the games are supposed to be on lower detail so it's more cpu dependent.
Спасибо за адекватные тесты, показывающие реальную разницу у среднего пользователя, который явно на низких в 720р играть не будет
Good work. I would be interested in a test with a 4070ti super in this setup.
using 4070ti and r7 5700x for a year and it is perfect
I've got the same GPU but with a 5800X3D and I'll guarantee that 5700x is a bottleneck if you play something like Cyberpunk with RT on. Sure for a lot of games there won't be much difference but newer titles and those with intensive RT certainly benefit from the extra cache
@@carllavery4442 nah getting 90+ fps on cyber no issues the game got dlls3.5 man
@@carllavery4442 playing 2K btw
1080p? I'm playing at 1440p and went from a 5700G (which in turn has less cache than the 5700X) to the 5800X3D and at the same settings the gap in performance was huge
Thanks for this test i just upgraded my r5 3600 to the 5700x and this removes my buyers remorse. The x3d is very case specific and am glad to see some real world case scenario's
Can i ask if you saw any performance increase?
@@infiniteops820 Think I got 5-10% in palworld @ 4k and cyberpunk was negligible. I upgraded the ram also recently so not much else to compare to.The chip runs cooler though so I was able to reduce case temps and noise.
If I had the money to buy into am5 then I would consider the x3d more closely
Interesting! thanks for the video.
I'm really happy that I decided on an R7 5800X3D, it's simply faster in the future than what I had before. I think this is a great CPU.
Will the results be similar with a more powerful GPU?
Thx for the test. I rather will buy 5700x+2tb nvme ssd then 5800x3d only. I have same GPU and as i see there is no even 15-20% fps increase but price difference is x2
видеокарта не дает увидеть разницу. тут скорее тест видеокарты чем процессора :)
@@W_Woland_W Я до сих пор не понимаю стоит ли менять 3600 на 5700х или разницы особо не будет? Щас у меня одна вебкамера в обс отнимает 10% процессора. Будет ли разница 1 и 0.1%. Рассматривал 5800x3d, но стоит он 28к, вместо 13-14к за 5700х + вмести с ним можно будет взять ссд на 2тб.
@@SIKSOF для стримов конечно 5800х3д. смысл менять 3600 и 4600 есть:) 5000 линейка намного имбовее. 5700х вполне подойдет 5700х оптимальный вариант. 5800х3д топ
@@SIKSOF ну еще надо оперативку чтоб 3800 или 4000 тянула. если проц потянет. у меня 5800х3д только 3800 могет тянуть изза инфинитифабрик. но я разогнал его по шине. сам проц
@@W_Woland_W 4600? Как я тебе его в компьютер вставлю? Да и смысла больше 3600-3800мгц для райзенов 3 и 5 поколения нет, там уже тайминги важнее, а 5800X3D ему вообще пофиг на разгон оперативы из-за большого кеша. Что за дизинфу ты пишешь?
Don't test with 3070.
Use 4080 or 4090, you will see a significant difference there.
😄
agreed
You think someone can spot more smoothness with the human eye after 60fps?
RDR2 looked smooth on my Ps4 at 1080p/30fps .
@@Crashed131963 "You think someone can spot more smoothness with the human eye after 60fps?" I think so.
"RDR2 looked smooth on my Ps4 at 1080p/30fps" I feel sorry for you.
@@zsoltritzl6978 Gets worst, every ps4 game I ever played did not look choppy to me .
Now with my Ps5 at 60fps I sure can't say 60 looks 2X smoother than 30 .
Wtf, why u testing the processor with all games in high settings on a rtx 3070 ? All games using 99% of gpu on this settings. You need to test in low settings or in a better gpu!
People won't play in low settings his test it's a real life test scenario
@@capetamenino except in all competitive games, like cs, halo, cod, battlefield, rainbow 6, apex etc etc etc
@@HiiaSkeR Yeah that's why two kinds of tests are needed
Oh my God, when you want to render numbers between 2 processors you want the graphics details as low as possible so that the processor is forced to run at the highest draw calls it can,the test is wrong, basically what you are doing is having " crippled" the 0.1/1% fps of the 5800x3d with the result that the avgs are lower.
Dang. chill, your attitude isn't gonna motivate the person to redo the test. And it's not a useless test, it's just not optimal for you. Many people don't game on the lowest possible settings so the test is good for most people.. this test represents a more realistic use case.
the test was very helpful. especially since many people are using mid-range GPUs. a 5800x3d only makes a difference in most games with an rtx4070 / rx6800xt or higher, or in games that are extremely cpu-heavy.
I have a rx6800 which is between a rtx3060ti and rtx3070 and in my case a cpu upgrade makes no sense especially in 1440p.
Lol... all games in max settings and gpu 90%++. Is a gpu test, no cpu.
And that makes this bad how? This is how benchmarks work, it shows the difference in average usecases.
@@ludvigholst4767 Yes, that makes a total difference. Cpu vs cpu must be with underutilized gpu. That's the basics!
@@ludvigholst4767 on 4k ultra, with a 3070, the ryzen 1600 = 7800x3d in this games... zzzz
100% usage gpu = gpu test, not cpu!
Basic, basic and basic.
wanted to write the same comment
for people with mid range gpus it make sense.
this test shows that the 5700x does not bottleneck those cards and there is almost no difference.
hmm.. not much difference.. I think ill stick with my 5700x and RTX3080 for awhile until I upgrade out of the AM4 socket.
How did you get all these statistic???
Why use the old battlefield???
even gtx 1080 8gb, has more fps with 5800x3d, LoL! what is this benchmark?
Gpu is limiting the performance in most of the games, try lowering the resolution if you really want to test the cpu
try to make the cpu the limiting factor, now you are showcasing the rtx 3070
LOL, according to this "benchmark" the 5800x3d with a price tag of $350 is only at best around 5% better than the $165 5700x? Something ain't making sense here.....🤣🤣🤣
Its because of the 3070....
Fake i have a ryzen 7 5700 non x and a rtx 4060 and run on high settings and get more frames then him ..
how come in battlefield im seeing 80% utilisation on my 5700x paired with a 6650xt where you was only seeing 50%
Maybe ram or HDD is different? Not criticizing
Do you have fluid frames enabled? I'm experimenting with my settings
Do you think I can stream in 1080 with a Ryzen 5 5600x and an RTX 3070?
As far as I know, the Streaming would be done by your RTX 3070, so the R5 5600X can take care of its work for video games and other tasks that are in the background (including your communication with other players and your audience).
It is advisable to have a good processor with more Cores/more Threads for these matters of Streaming/Video Editing/Rendering etc., but already having the R5 5600X I would not see the need to change anything.
If you have not yet bought that R5 5600/5600X and your budget can fit the R7 5700X, buy the latter if you consider it appropriate.
@@juanmassiosare9850 Right, well, I'm currently deciding between the 5600x, 5700x and 5800x, even if I'm less likely to buy the latter because of its price. So if I've understood correctly, the RTX 3070 will be able to handle streaming and gaming at the same time, while my processor takes care of the rest?
@@Lucaasaas ...In fact, the RTX 3070, similar or higher GPU could not only give you a good service when playing and streaming at the same time, but it would allow you to record your gameplay with Nvidia Shadowplay, that is, you can stream taking advantage of the NVEC of the Nvidia graphics, instead of using your Processor.
Nvidia Shadowplay.
ruclips.net/video/XQT-h4wITXw/видео.html
* Some prefer to "play defensively" and transmit at 720p and others "play offensively" because they do it at 1080p. It would be a matter of trying with each game, to see what is more comfortable for you in the end.
- Nvidia NVENC.
ruclips.net/video/bpoDanWJ4Cw/видео.html
If you were a simple player who is not interested in recording gameplay or streaming, I would tell you that the Ryzen 5 5600 is enough (usually cheaper than the R5 5600X), the same with an Intel i5 12400/12400F, but economically You can afford it, whether or not you do Streaming/Recording/Video Editing, without a doubt the ideal CPU would be the Ryzen 7 5700X.
The Ryzen 7 5700X has practically the same performance as the Ryzen 7 5800X, but usually costing less, consuming less power and generating less heat than the 5800X, and in recent months the R7 5700X has been seen at a price closer to the R5 5600 /5600X, so it sounds more interesting, especially because of your user profile.
In the same way, I will tell you that 16GB RAM/2x8GB (DDR4 in this case) is enough for most normal players, but for those who want something more (on a whim) or for those who really have more advanced uses (apart from playing) It would be advisable to have 32GB/2x16GB or 4x8GB, so you should take advantage of the fact that DDR4 ram is still cheap.
* For the Ryzen 5000, DDR4 ram at 3600Mhz and CL16 is good, there are models at 3600Mhz/CL18 that are not bad, but the ideal would be CL16 (DDR4 3600Mhz/CL18 has a performance close to DDR4 3200Mhz/CL16).
If your budget allows it, if you want the best performance now at the best possible price and if you are interested in configuring a Platform with more Future than the Intel-1200 socket, AMD-AM4 and even the Intel-1700 socket, you will I would recommend looking towards Socket AM5 for the Ryzen 7000 and DDR5 ram.
In this case, at least I would think of a Ryzen 5 7600/7600X (6 cores/12 threads but with Zen3 microarchitecture), which costs much less than a Ryzen 7 5800X3D and barely more than a Ryzen 7 5800X and not much more than a Ryzen 7 5700X; The Ryzen 5 7600/7600X have similar performance to an Intel i5 13600K and their performance is more consistent than that of the Ryzen 7 5800X3D (COSTING LESS).
The problem with the Ryzen 7000 is the cost of the MoBo socket AM5 and the DDR5 ram; As for the MoBo, I would be interested in one with a B650 chipset and as for the ram, it would be good to reach 2x16GB DDR5-6000MHz EXPO version (more efficient for AMD), if not at least 5600Mhz or thereabouts.
As a CPU-Cooler I would recommend the Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 SE, as it has very good performance and is usually cheaper than other options. It will serve you well for the Ryzen 5000 and 7000 (and Intel CPUs).
www.amazon.com/Thermalright-Peerless-Assassin-120-Cooler/dp/B09LGY38L4?th=1
ruclips.net/video/Mm4hyIHe1PM/видео.html
.
@@Lucaasaaswhy would you go for 3070 when u have 6700xt/6650xt/6800 non xt. (U can stream on AMD don't be silly and throw money on 3070.
@@pR0ManiacS I know, I know amd's prices and what they're worth, but in terms of streaming you can't say that AMD equals Nvidia, I'd really like to, but that's not the case, the encoding of Nvidia's graphics cards is much better than AMD's.
alguien por favor me recomienden por favor miren esto estos 3 precesadores puedo comprarme osea cual me puedo dicen ustedes---
el ryzen 7 8700F
ryzen 7 5700X
ryzen 7 5600X3d
A ESTO AGREGO QUE LA GRAFICA ES UNA 4070 SUPER, que ya la tengo... alguien me aconseja cual procesador me combiene con esa grafica... gracias por leerme
Personalmente diría por relación calidad precio la
5700x
En este video se ve q es mejor q la 5800x3d
Cual le pusiste ?
Big difference with price of 3d's. Really Not necesaary 😅
It's strange that the difference between the two processors is so small, even in the competitive game Apex Legends.
The accuracy of the test does not appear to be reliable.
look @RainbowSix and GTA, there you can see the big difference..because less GPU bound !
Always turn on msaa on gta
aham
You think someone can spot more smoothness with the human eye after 40 fps?
RDR2 and Witchers 3 looked smooth on my Ps4 at 1080p/30fps when I played them .
Movies and TV are shown at 24 fps .
Human eye is 60fps. Two eyes...let say ...120...
Much more is marketing and...smoother in game movements.
@@julienredfox7489 thats not how our eyes work at all LMAO and our eyes can see a lot more than 60 FPS or even 120FPS...
@@NimbleFPS you're totally wrong. Go talking to a specialist. You're a not a robot...
120hz+ screen are pure marketing.
It's smoother yes but just that. It's an adequation between screen and GPU. Just that. One eye is 60-70hz max. It's just...NATURE. Sorry.
@@julienredfox7489 being confident doesn't make you less incorrect
@@zokuva ok...doctor 🤷🏻♂️