Excellent! Thank you. Would love a full filter video. Coming from an audio engineering background, I know what the filters are doing, but some of the controls in BF are structured differently. Would be great if you could highlight a suitable starting point from which to perform further tuning.
Iβve been flying for almost 6 years and never really bothered with βblack boxβ. I recently built a 7β AOS I couldnβt tune myself. Someone online had been gracious enough to help tune via black box recordings. Can you do a video on what settings should be set up on black box. Iβm using Inav black box for this build but all my other quads are BF, Iβd like to delve more into black box. Shame on me for not doing this sooner! π’
Amazing the quad did not freak out on the first test. How does the wobble script keep that quad on one spot? I would not trust anything in house like that besides my own control. It sure looks nice!
So maybe if you are prone to bashing props you could tune 250q with 50 weight so rpm filter would have wider target area to be able to handle the noise of chewed up props?
i think it's the opposite. if you bang up your props you need rpm filters more. If your quad is clean enough and doesn't need as much filtering, you can ease up on the filtering as described here.
@TimeFadesMemoryLasts yes but you can widen the q to hit the areas thst might not have been there with clean props. And have some delay by lowering the % attenuation. Idk?
@@JLfpv unbalance in the prop always sits right at the RPM number (and its harmonics). If you cut off a blade, the noise will still be at the same values of a pristine prop, it's just that the noise peak will be a lot higher but it should not be broader. But on second thought: In practice, because of the changed aerodynamics, maybe you have additional vibrations in the bent/broken prop that's coming from the additional turbulences which is causing broader RPM peaks...
Amazing,thank you so much for helping out
Thx man. The data in the blackbox is great while the tool and methodology of getting insights from the data is equally or even more great.
Now that's detail , great video π
Excellent! Thank you. Would love a full filter video. Coming from an audio engineering background, I know what the filters are doing, but some of the controls in BF are structured differently. Would be great if you could highlight a suitable starting point from which to perform further tuning.
Awesome, thank you very much for the detailed explanation!
Amazing video, very interesting
Great work, like always! Now I know what to do on Sundays with bad weather.
As always very informative and well presented. Thank you.
WOW very deep. You seem to enjoy it. How about a bunch of presets. Love the info. Thanks
Iβve been flying for almost 6 years and never really bothered with βblack boxβ. I recently built a 7β AOS I couldnβt tune myself. Someone online had been gracious enough to help tune via black box recordings. Can you do a video on what settings should be set up on black box. Iβm using Inav black box for this build but all my other quads are BF, Iβd like to delve more into black box. Shame on me for not doing this sooner! π’
Very helpful! Many thanks Brian
Great show and tell. π
Thats great I think I need to look at the wobble method to take data for filter setup, because it looks very clean and interpretable...
Itβs pretty cool. Works well on radiomaster zorro with convenient momentary switches
Great expiation Brian π
very good video Brian as usual
Great video, thanks
great info, thanks for sharing. You the man
Great, thank you.
Excellence
its great , thanks man.
Thanks.
Nice !
Hi, I'm having trouble activating the PID on my plane... I can't get the other options to work."
Can someone help me out?"
Holly cown. That Nice
qua tuyet voi thanks
4:23 @PIDtoolbox Is that an Openracer build ?
Indeed
Amazing the quad did not freak out on the first test. How does the wobble script keep that quad on one spot? I would not trust anything in house like that besides my own control. It sure looks nice!
Level mode with a sine input
@@PIDtoolbox works wonders! I assume you give small stick inputs yourself to keep the quad steady.
@@helidude71 yes you still have full control over position
Do you use the wobble log for adjusting the filter weights?
You can to some degree but still best to double confirm with a subsequent throttle ramp in the field. But certainly a good starting point
So maybe if you are prone to bashing props you could tune 250q with 50 weight so rpm filter would have wider target area to be able to handle the noise of chewed up props?
i think it's the opposite. if you bang up your props you need rpm filters more.
If your quad is clean enough and doesn't need as much filtering, you can ease up on the filtering as described here.
I think DNs are always ideal for that
@TimeFadesMemoryLasts yes but you can widen the q to hit the areas thst might not have been there with clean props. And have some delay by lowering the % attenuation. Idk?
@@PIDtoolbox thanks.
@@JLfpv unbalance in the prop always sits right at the RPM number (and its harmonics). If you cut off a blade, the noise will still be at the same values of a pristine prop, it's just that the noise peak will be a lot higher but it should not be broader.
But on second thought: In practice, because of the changed aerodynamics, maybe you have additional vibrations in the bent/broken prop that's coming from the additional turbulences which is causing broader RPM peaks...
Is yaw filtered by RPM? Or should it be 2 axes?
Yes it is
So freaking hard to understand all this stuff) My brain is melting