I never get tired of that sound, and even just admiring how flat the chassis stays when turning is awe-inspiring. It sux being 6'4"; I imagine even if I had the money, I couldn't fit into an F1 car in this lifetime.
SuperN0va Justin Wilson was 6'3" back in '03 or so. Hell, he even had an investment program to help fund his ride. At least it paid for the special seat... He did OK.
The aerodynamic on a bike is horrible. The low weight gives a short advantage, but then the downforce in F1 kills it. With a better ground clearance, the F1 would have zoom away faster
So True... this Hybrid Bullshit is a Joke.... Next will be FULL electric. Why I haven't watch last season (not to mention the cheating that's been going on for atleast 20 yrs, with team orders), It as bad as USA POLITICs.;-(
400 meters in 9.0 s is not exactly fast for an F1 car... Schumacher did a 600 meter run on wets in 9,4 s back in 2003 with the F2003-GA F1. I also want to point out that the age of the car does not matter as even the 1994 F1 Benetton would actually accelerate faster than today's 2021 F1 car. It's all about wheel-spin and initial grip.
RA30st08 I looked at the video again and those are grooved standard slicks as raced in every F1 race since the full slicks were changed from the old F1 era. I don't know what you are on about?
Graham Wilson Mate, what drugs are on you? Slicks by definition are slick....it's onomatopoeic for christs sake....what more do you need!? They do NOT have grooves. If they had grooves, they would no longer be slick!!!! What about this concept are you finding difficult? I think you need some education boy, slicks were reintroduced by god damn 2009....I know F1 can be boring but 6 years is a long time not to notice...
You just told me that grooved tyres were replaced in 2009 so you know what I'm talking about. How else do you describe a grooved tyre for dry surfaces? I am not on drugs and Christ has nothing to do with this, I'm not you're boy either. Learn some manners sir, you're use of language leaves a lot to be desired, God Bless.
brinu ton The problem for bikes is not a lack of power. not even close. but the real problem is putting all that power on the road. you can give it even 350 bhp. but a bike will never ever be able to generate the downforce required to put it all on the road off the line. F1 car is the king. and dont even start with what happens when they get to the end of a straight into (what is alien to bikers or they just pretend it never exists) a turn. The F1 car will absolutely spank a MotoGP and run away. even F3 and V8 supercars will be able to put numbers close to the MotoGP bikes round a track.
Don't fuck with a V10 F1 car, 8sec 0-300kph, 375kph top speed without DRS, best transmission known to exist, bike fanatics can moan about this not being a Moto GP bike but a Moto GP bike is actually slightly slower than a V8 F1 car car nevermind V10 beasts like a R25 or the F2004.
+TheChamp 101 A MotoGP bike would have had chance in a drag race (280 hp @ 160kg and very advanced electronics). Also, the Honda seamless gearbox of their MotoGP bike is faster than F1 transmissions.
Vin Look there's no technology on a Moto GP bike that's more advanced than a F1 car, all these seamless shifts or pneumatic valve and other stuff all came from F1 7-8 years earlier, and yeah your power to weight is flawed, that's a dry weight for the bike, add fuel and other fluids, add the rider and his gear the bike weighs 250kgs... That gives the bike barely 1000hp per ton, no better than let's say a One:1 road car, where as a F1 car like the F2004 or R25 was 605kg with fuel and driver included and also they produced 970hp so as you can see a V10 F1 car of the mid 2000s would eat any Moto GP bike in a straight line, oh yeah if they're setup for top speed Honda got over 412kph on a airstrip so even top speed is out of reach for a Moto GP bike which can only reach 350kph, also just to note modern F1 cars from Mercedes and Ferrari are set to reach 1000hp again next year with bucket load of torque and the most advanced electronics known to man apart from maybe the most latest military gear so yeah there you go.
+Mike You clearly know nothing about boats. You'd shit youself in that on the open sea with any waves. Crap compared to an F1 car? Of course it is on speed. Stupid test.
Agreed, and they need to start actually enforcing even regulations and penalties across the grid. Its obvious the political powers want Mercedes and Hamilton to win. Events of the hybrid era made that painfully obvious. Before Hamilton even entered the sport both Eccelstone and Dennis talked about Hamilton as if he was made of gold. The fix was in. But the sport wont take away the hybrids or the regulations Mercedes needs to win, Mercedes and the F1 owners are making way too much money off of things the way they are now. The sport is a political sham now.
Pal, in fact for FIA, F1 had reached its pinnacle during its V10 time...yes they could make even faster cars than the V10 but limited for safety reasons...no point making cars that too quick but hard to be controlled...so for that reason, they decided to reduced the power from time to time plus with a more "earth-friendly" engines.
xlegomatteox Better?Im sorry they may produce more power but no driver enjoys driving a bad sounding engine,and worse still this is added with the issue of extra torque.This change also gave one team a huge advantage,both in engine and aero.The new power units dont even last longer than the v8s.Im not totally against the new engines,but its made f1 loose its identity,imo
xlegomatteox Ive been a to a race myself this year..For the record i never said they were SOFT,I said the QUALITY of the sound is not what it used to be.I agree tho that f1lost its identity since 200i
My world again makes sense after that first race. That F1 car makes even the CART Indy cars of the early to mid 1990's sound low revving. Good God, what a beautiful sound.
Of course the F1 wins, but check out how the Bike keeps right up in the first few seconds, thats astonishing for something you can actually buy, specially considering the F1 is the most advanced and specialized race car in the world.
Even though Jenson never won a Grand Prix driver's championship (to my knowledge), he remains one of my favorite drivers....besides he seems like such a normal down to earth bloke. Hearing that glorious beautiful V10, I feel so glad I lived in the great v10 era of f1 & the unrestricted 80s & 90s of F1.
That dude is one of those guys that when speaking to you just have to enter your personal space. Stand uncomfortably close and look at you like your the love of his life.Yeah...can't stand those.
Could they have found a SLOWER boat??? 1,100 kG? What a PIG! Here in the US, nearly every fishing boat built in the last decade will run 75mph+ with only a 150HP motor.. Hell, my 31 year old antique runs in the mid-90's, and I've driven friends boats well over 110 mph. If you're going to use a competition car and bike, go get a modern 8,000 HP top fuel hydro and you'll have a much different result. ;-)
***** it would matter a lot actually i was just hoping they would pick a good bike like the kawasaki h2 but then i realised that back then it was still being designed but now i think that it would be a closer match with top speed of around 260 mph on the bike.
When the narrator said the valves springs wont open and close quick enough, surly he means close quick enough as the opening is done by a cam and would open at whatever speed the the cam hits the valve at, or am I wrong?
I remember a painful video a few years ago; I believe it was a Grand Prix car vs a Toyota Corolla on a short inside drag race, probably no more than 200 yards, and the stupid Corolla won! It may have been Mythbusters or Top Gear. I bet it's on RUclips somewhere. I don't even know if I could stand to watch it again. Pure heresy.
+gsymdzd1 because i assume that the boat is at the top of its category. And i looks like its a prototype made for racing.. The f1 car is definitely as good as it gets in car racing. And its also a prototype made for racing. A superbike is neither. Its a production motorcycle, heavily modified for road racing
+BrappWithMe motovlogs in this is a comparativo between car bike and boat from honda, all of them maybe have the powerfull spec in that moment. for sure is another faster bike and boats
My grandpa was the founder of the powerboat racing strategy that you have to keep at least 48% of the boat off the water, and he did it with pure design and shaping, there was no electronic levers back then
The cameras and sounds are so annoying in this. The drag race is about 10 seconds long but they drag it out for like 30 seconds using repeated clips. So annoying.
Lol, bike fanboys pulling out the lamest and most ignorant excuses ever. Gotta understand the poor lads, being so paranoid all the time of being hit by bigger vehicles on the streets and getting cooked under the sun and frozen to death in winter can't be good for their brains. Out of the barely intelligent arguments they make: Get over it, kids: a "real moto gp" bike would not be much faster than this bike, it would be roasted by the car too. -You talking that bikes back in "da sixties" had crazier designs and features that would help this bike win? Lol, ever bothered to research the craziest designs F1 engineers were able to pull out? Jet powered cars are in the list...without mentioning that if you talk about giving the bike the "proper configuration for drag racing, the same can be done with the F1. Things like removing some ailerons and taking out the power limits of the engine...and you'll end up with a 2000 hp monster that would smoke any bike at 500 kph. Truth hurts.
Ive heard about those jet cars.....which is exactly what they are, jets on wheels...ovbiously your gonna win.....you must like bragging about how you can beat your sister in a fight as well huh lol You can only go so fast on a bike....two wheels
Nope. F1 cars are the annoying sounding corner turning car with a lousy top speed lousy acceleration and lousy BHP. Now days you can BUY cars for only $300,000 that go faster than an F1 car and sound 10000000000x better.
SomeDudeOnline the future, engineers figured out how to make cars faster for cheap and F1 simply didn't and in their attempt to they made a loud piece of crap that sounds like a vacuum. So basically, engineering fail.
lousy top speed ? yeah 372kmph . really lousy. lousy bhp. yeah 1000hp in quali trim while using less fuel than the v10s really lousy. 300,000 car faster than f1 looooolll . not to mention the v6s were faster than the v10s at Australia and Bahrain
Max Power No, that is incorrect. An F1 car is faster around a track, yes, but it can't match say, an RC213V for pure acceleration. You got your name from The Simpsons, yes? :-)
Niall Ferris i'd give the acceleration advantage to the Motorcycle as its lighter but top speed it's a tough one. An F1 car can reach speeds exceeding 190MPH while generating around 4 tonnes of Downforce. If Engineers could tinker with the vehicles like they normally would in a competition environment the Top speed would go to the F1 car as it's raw power is undeniable, i would say that if engineers wanted too they could make an F1 car exceed 240Mph but it would be less stable in the corners making it slower around a track. However if you took the vehicles straight out of competition and slapped them into a drag race i'd say the Bike would win due to the F1 car being setup for incredibly fast speeds around corners not Straight line speed. Either way, both are incredible machines.
No point in comparing the boat, basic physics dictates that because of the traction from road vs water you will naturally get better acceleration from land vehicles. Unless you can find a better way to propel the boat (like a jet) and find a way of anchoring it to the surface of the water (like a hydrofoil) to ensure that 100% of force is being applied to propel the boat forwards, it will always lose in a 10 second race.
If you time the F1 car's final run from helicopter at roughly late 8:47 to early 8:56 where you get the full run uncut its roughly 8.7sec which is close to carwow's MotoGP best time of 8.6sec which is much quicker than the Redbull RB8 V8, however this is the 2003 BAR Honda at 900hp which isnt quite as powerful as the Ferrari F2004's 960hp or the fastest launching V10 F1 car of the Renault R25 which had roughly 950hp and its fair to say either the F2004 or R25 could achieve a low 8s with a decent launch and Monza wing levels, hard to imagine cars from nearly 20 years ago are still the fastest F1 cars in a straight line, imagine if they used slicks from that last of the V10 eras, also imagine if the regulation hasnt changed for nearly 20 years and they kept on developing the V10s, we'd have 23,000rpm and 1300+hp now, it'd be scary in these cars especially with slicks that weighed 605kg with driver, gear and fluids, the car itself dry would weigh 520kg max with over 1300hp it would be too fast, even with 960hp its still close to 2000hp per ton and smashes modern MotoGP bike's power to weight if they stuck a rider on, we all wish the V10s and these lighter narrower chassis stayed in F1 BUT 2026 rules will narrow the cars again and make them lighter with 1000+hp, lets see how these new beasts go.
Dude you still crying? 😂 H2R would smash this F1 car This F1 had 950 HP 550 kg (2005) This F1 did a 9.7 seconds quarter mile in 2nd race listen to commentator MotoGP bike ran 8.2 seconds quarter mile @190 mph on Carwow Rimac 8.4 @174 mph ruclips.net/video/xsrBL6nqLXI/видео.htmlsi=L1Yddt_IUTNbKBSP Rimac Nevera 0-100 kph 1.9 sec 0-200 kph 4.2 sec 1/4 mile 8.4 sec on same Runway kid BMW S1000RR spanked this V10 F1 car off the line and 100 meters Then this F1 car beat a street legal bike H2R would be different outcome H2R smoked Redbull RB8 F1 car RB8 F1 ran 9.1 seconds quarter mile H2R is running 9.0 flat @171 mph 😂 H2R did 300 km/h on Speedometer before 1/4 mile This F1 car got no chance against H2R Redbull RB8 F1 lost early acceleration mid range acceleration H2R was Faster everywhere and pulling away Harder on top end
Your 8.7 got exposed bro it ran a 9.2 seconds quarter mile 😂 ruclips.net/video/CgtFJUdasHY/видео.htmlsi=g1WnP1dGoH9obkpl "950 HP , 550 kg" V10 2005 BAR honda F1 car It had 930 HP during races and weight with 600 kg with fuel and the driver inside the car So this car with low fuel will become as low as 525 KG Still can't do a 8.9 seconds quarter mile
He talks about how it's weird to use a clutch with your hand but it's also in your hand on a bike... Plus it's actually a better idea than a foot actuated clutch.
This type of "power boat" is fast of course, it's for racing, but is totally outclassed with the other 2 vehicles. They should have done the comparison using a drag boat. At least for a quarter mile it would have been competitive.
The bike was probably owned by some guy from bristol who rode it there, and will ride it home and cost £10k new. The F1 car came from japan and had a full team of engineers take hours to assemble and take millions and millions of pounds. To win by 4/10ths of a second..
to win in a drag race which the f1 car is not made for as its main purpose is for turning and being the fastest on track using downforce and power to weight ratio...
Not really. That boat was way too underpowered. There are jet skis which are more powerful than that. A drag boat would be more fitting. Also, they could've used a MotoGP motorcycle (which is pretty much superior to an SBK motorcycle) and then it would be a fair race.
The fans blowing through the radiator while starting the engine of the F1 racecar don't cool the engine. They heat the engine up because the pistons are actually compression fit and in order for the engine to be running it needs to be heated to operating temperature so the block can expand and let the pistons loose.
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
that high reving sound of that F1 engine.... damn
The only thing that keeps me fron watching F1 is the sound, it sounds awful
+edisonsun21c still not as good as the old v12 engines
+Markus Wiedner yeah. 20+ cars at upwards of 10,000 rpm on v10s are horrible, and way too loud and high to be good for anyone, honestly.
+cakeless coder Just fucking stay away then.
azynkron I do. or just watch it with the cars muted. man they go fast, and watching them race because they are incredible.
race starts at 6:55
you're welcome
Haha thanks... That's literally all I wanted
Thanks, was starting to lose my erection
No thank you
Sock
Tq
To be fair, I think the boat would be faster if they were all in the water 8-)
You're a smart dude. Never think about that at all..lol
Why dont bring all 3 of them into the air?
I think the boat would be slower on asphalt also….
On dry land?
lol that comment cheered me up
GLORIOUS V10 noise, massive goosebumps.
I never get tired of that sound, and even just admiring how flat the chassis stays when turning is awe-inspiring. It sux being 6'4"; I imagine even if I had the money, I couldn't fit into an F1 car in this lifetime.
Yeah I'm 6'3". The seat is custom made for the driver though so you should be able to fit.
SuperN0va Justin Wilson was 6'3" back in '03 or so. Hell, he even had an investment program to help fund his ride. At least it paid for the special seat... He did OK.
Nicktrance1 Nothing compared to the fans and combo charger when you stand up close. If the car is idling you can hear a jet engine-like whine.
I just got chills down my spine hearing that V10 scream. Unbelievable how that car just rocketed away from the bike
The aerodynamic on a bike is horrible. The low weight gives a short advantage, but then the downforce in F1 kills it. With a better ground clearance, the F1 would have zoom away faster
@@Joest75 bring a motogp bike it'll smack the F1 in a straight line
@@Joest75 or H2R
An f1 car will destroy a motogp bike forget h2r...
@@Joest75 the bike has excellent aerodynamics for what it is, it’s a super sport bike, I guess you need to get your facts checked
The F1 cars of this period were probably the most aesthetically build peace of machine.
Visually and acoustically.
The acceleration of the F1 car is just outrageous.
I like how the f1 says "Don't walk" on the spoiler lol
Hey those f1 cars used to sound pretty cool
They should add a civic
true it would be cool to see how it compares
Jann Chavez that vtec yo
That would be unfair to the F1 car.
for scale :D
Ek9
V10 f1 engines....
We need to go back to that time..
+Geardos Yes.
I think I have found a 1 sec 0-100 car. If his was possible, super grippy AWD V12 F1 car
So True... this Hybrid Bullshit is a Joke.... Next will be FULL electric. Why I haven't watch last season (not to mention the cheating that's been going on for atleast 20 yrs, with team orders), It as bad as USA POLITICs.;-(
@@JerseyMikeP Just because Formula One is runed by an American Company
@@gabeitch7009 ??? American Company??? The FIA runs Formula One. FIA is based in France.
400 meters in 9.0 s is not exactly fast for an F1 car...
Schumacher did a 600 meter run on wets in 9,4 s back in 2003 with the F2003-GA F1. I also want to point out that the age of the car does not matter as even the 1994 F1 Benetton would actually accelerate faster than today's 2021 F1 car. It's all about wheel-spin and initial grip.
U see the wet tyres on that Honda? Imagine up to heat slicks....
RA30st08 Those are grooved slicks...
RA30st08 I looked at the video again and those are grooved standard slicks as raced in every F1 race since the full slicks were changed from the old F1 era. I don't know what you are on about?
Graham Wilson Mate, what drugs are on you? Slicks by definition are slick....it's onomatopoeic for christs sake....what more do you need!?
They do NOT have grooves. If they had grooves, they would no longer be slick!!!! What about this concept are you finding difficult?
I think you need some education boy, slicks were reintroduced by god damn 2009....I know F1 can be boring but 6 years is a long time not to notice...
You just told me that grooved tyres were replaced in 2009 so you know what I'm talking about. How else do you describe a grooved tyre for dry surfaces? I am not on drugs and Christ has nothing to do with this, I'm not you're boy either. Learn some manners sir, you're use of language leaves a lot to be desired, God Bless.
Should have used a MotoGP bike
I agree
MotoGP35 you should check MotoGP and F1 record lap times ..
Ajay Kumar this is about straight line speed not lap time round a track..a moto gp bike would have done better with over 250bhp
brinu ton The problem for bikes is not a lack of power. not even close. but the real problem is putting all that power on the road. you can give it even 350 bhp. but a bike will never ever be able to generate the downforce required to put it all on the road off the line. F1 car is the king. and dont even start with what happens when they get to the end of a straight into (what is alien to bikers or they just pretend it never exists) a turn. The F1 car will absolutely spank a MotoGP and run away. even F3 and V8 supercars will be able to put numbers close to the MotoGP bikes round a track.
Ajay Kumar No shit Sherlock
Don't fuck with a V10 F1 car, 8sec 0-300kph, 375kph top speed without DRS, best transmission known to exist, bike fanatics can moan about this not being a Moto GP bike but a Moto GP bike is actually slightly slower than a V8 F1 car car nevermind V10 beasts like a R25 or the F2004.
The Ducatis are really powerful. So I am not sure
+TheChamp 101 A MotoGP bike would have had chance in a drag race (280 hp @ 160kg and very advanced electronics).
Also, the Honda seamless gearbox of their MotoGP bike is faster than F1 transmissions.
Vin Look there's no technology on a Moto GP bike that's more advanced than a F1 car, all these seamless shifts or pneumatic valve and other stuff all came from F1 7-8 years earlier, and yeah your power to weight is flawed, that's a dry weight for the bike, add fuel and other fluids, add the rider and his gear the bike weighs 250kgs... That gives the bike barely 1000hp per ton, no better than let's say a One:1 road car, where as a F1 car like the F2004 or R25 was 605kg with fuel and driver included and also they produced 970hp so as you can see a V10 F1 car of the mid 2000s would eat any Moto GP bike in a straight line, oh yeah if they're setup for top speed Honda got over 412kph on a airstrip so even top speed is out of reach for a Moto GP bike which can only reach 350kph, also just to note modern F1 cars from Mercedes and Ferrari are set to reach 1000hp again next year with bucket load of torque and the most advanced electronics known to man apart from maybe the most latest military gear so yeah there you go.
Yeah a old school v10 2003 car was when the cars peaked performance. BAR Honda was not even the best car either. imagine the ferrari or the Mclaren.
+TheChamp 101 MotoGP is way faster than V8 F1 on straight.
that boat is crap lol
you can buy a 300 HP jet ski
+ Mike es mucho mas dificil en el agua que en la tierra
+Ciclista FMC Yeah because he can read that shit...
+Mike You clearly know nothing about boats. You'd shit youself in that on the open sea with any waves. Crap compared to an F1 car? Of course it is on speed. Stupid test.
+Tim Coe - myUSP they don't race these boat class anymore, probably the nicest boat design made. Now they are fucking ugly and just turn over
I know. Ten years ago probably yes? You're referring to the P1 Superstocks today are you?
A power boat? They shoulda raced a hydroplane, then let's see who wins.
Thank you - was gonna write the exact same comment!
for real tho how was that fair
Hydroplane? Take it against the top fuel dragsters.
@@JEN-sg3fo unlimited hydro is powered by a 3000 hp turbine engine
@@jorgendahl5024 And Top Fuel Dragster Boats are powered with 10.000hp V8 engines
Wow! I think I counted 25 gear changes from the F1 car on their last go xD
Fast and furious transmission confirmed
It only has 8 gears...
@@reefrekter9710 that car had 7
@@reefrekter9710 8 is from 2014
FIA need to bring back 3 litre V10s with no rev limit, then I might start watching again.
Agreed, and they need to start actually enforcing even regulations and penalties across the grid. Its obvious the political powers want Mercedes and Hamilton to win. Events of the hybrid era made that painfully obvious. Before Hamilton even entered the sport both Eccelstone and Dennis talked about Hamilton as if he was made of gold. The fix was in. But the sport wont take away the hybrids or the regulations Mercedes needs to win, Mercedes and the F1 owners are making way too much money off of things the way they are now. The sport is a political sham now.
It's satisfying watching that F1 car accelerate pass the bike and boat at such speed
It is a superbike not a motogp bike. Superbike 200hp
Motogp 280hp at least. And less weight
@@patrickschoon3226 this V10 F1 and GP bikes will be side by side till 200 km/h after 200 kph no chance Moto GP bike will pull away so hard
wow the f1 car sounds SO much better that the 2014 version c`mon Bernie can we stop saving the planet and have some monster v10`s back ?
Pal, in fact for FIA, F1 had reached its pinnacle during its V10 time...yes they could make even faster cars than the V10 but limited for safety reasons...no point making cars that too quick but hard to be controlled...so for that reason, they decided to reduced the power from time to time plus with a more "earth-friendly" engines.
xlegomatteox Better?Im sorry they may produce more power but no driver enjoys driving a bad sounding engine,and worse still this is added with the issue of extra torque.This change also gave one team a huge advantage,both in engine and aero.The new power units dont even last longer than the v8s.Im not totally against the new engines,but its made f1 loose its identity,imo
xlegomatteox Ive been a to a race myself this year..For the record i never said they were SOFT,I said the QUALITY of the sound is not what it used to be.I agree tho that f1lost its identity since 200i
2009*
i think its about safety reason not for save the fuckin earth planet
225 hp for a powerboat? that doesn't sound right lol
Lucas ㅤ ㅤㅤ if i get a power boat I'd go for 450 p.s.
they should had used one of these for the comparison.... ruclips.net/video/jzm6Gr3LYhE/видео.html
Agreed, they need a mercury racing 1550 SCI or maybe settle for a measly 1350
There's no way that F1 is idling at less than 1,000 RPM. It must be a x10 gauge.
+Tim Ramich exactly what it is
they actually idle around 3,500 rpm. i knew a guy that built them for a while.
+eric homewood Maybe for the older ones, but if I remember correctly, they sit at 6000rpm now.
+eric homewood they idle arround 7-8k rpm
it has been 3 months now so I'm gonna add another 1000rpm to the idle rpm. It's now 8-9k rpm.
Jenson indeed became a world champion...🥰🥰🥰
I remember watching this when it came out. Thinking he could do it, the set back after set back. Then came Brawn GP….
jenson button 'a future world champion' turned out to be correct
F1 in one word : insane
My world again makes sense after that first race. That F1 car makes even the CART Indy cars of the early to mid 1990's sound low revving. Good God, what a beautiful sound.
Do F1 vs Indycar vs Nascar next!
Bob4Lakers3 F1 Would still win...
Displaced Jonesable what did you say punk. My 1,248 HP Toyota would smoke all of these cute toy story toys!!! Period
Max x No.
Max x you claim to drive a toyota... yet you use a pontiac as your emblem... Well done.
Displaced Jonesable my identity has been broken run!!!
Came here after reading Michael Rutter’s book ;)
I'd love to try F-1. Sounds so sick
you'll burn clutch...
Look at that last run, the BAR clocked 8.7sec, and thats with the bike having slight better launch.
It didn't it was 9.7
Commentetor said 0.3 sec faster than bike and bike ran 10.0 flat
_"...let's include a boat..."_ what ? You may as well have had Sir Bradley on a carbon bicycle with a rolling start.
Man i miss that v10 sound it's so satisfying
Future world champion indeed
this was aired in 2004 and after 10 years still manages to entertain people.. impressive to say the least
Of course the F1 wins, but check out how the Bike keeps right up in the first few seconds, thats astonishing for something you can actually buy, specially considering the F1 is the most advanced and specialized race car in the world.
That motorcycle costs a million pounds a season.
oh man.....I surely miss the sound of the v10
:/ depressing eh?
I don't it's v8s and v10s I prefere
in the bikes defense, he couldnt get in it until 3rd gear, but that car is a beast. lol
+phatrides222000 pretty much the same for F1. F1 was holding back bcause of traction
Kitkat Dominance good point.I would rather spin in a car than flip my bike though.
Even though Jenson never won a Grand Prix driver's championship (to my knowledge), he remains one of my favorite drivers....besides he seems like such a normal down to earth bloke. Hearing that glorious beautiful V10, I feel so glad I lived in the great v10 era of f1 & the unrestricted 80s & 90s of F1.
You will be happy to hear that he won the 2009 Driver's Championship!
And his first win was Hungary 2006
That dude is one of those guys that when speaking to you just have to enter your personal space. Stand uncomfortably close and look at you like your the love of his life.Yeah...can't stand those.
A V10 in F1.... Those were times....
Surprising that the best time the F1 car had in the 1/4 was 9 seconds and change.
im pretty happy with these results.. bike did amazingly considered it was up against a $6m car.. not bad for a mid end bike!
this is 10 years ago!!!
ha ha ha
Guy Fawkes ???wtf is wrong with you?you are a fucking old man.lol
Guy Fawkes u got serious problems gay lord.
nothing to add, you just shit your pants, sorry old fart.
barozanul2 im from Finland but whatever
F1 driver was like: should I? Do I really should? Ok, lemme step on that accelerator
Could they have found a SLOWER boat??? 1,100 kG? What a PIG!
Here in the US, nearly every fishing boat built in the last decade will run 75mph+ with only a 150HP motor..
Hell, my 31 year old antique runs in the mid-90's, and I've driven friends boats well over 110 mph.
If you're going to use a competition car and bike, go get a modern 8,000 HP top fuel hydro and you'll have a much different result. ;-)
CBR600 ?? Not fair! F1 should compete the MotoGP class a.k.a 1000cc superbike. >:(
Yes not fair
Proves that cars are faster than bikes 🤪
I think a modern drag boat would have crushed them both.
ruclips.net/video/jzm6Gr3LYhE/видео.html one of these will easily beat both of those
Wasn't even a challenge for the F1...
F1 Vs Superbike is wrong, F1 vs MotoGP is the real deal
Gaston Gamba Wouldn't matter much, but I wish they had a better boat XD
***** it would matter a lot actually i was just hoping they would pick a good bike like the kawasaki h2 but then i realised that back then it was still being designed but now i think that it would be a closer match with top speed of around 260 mph on the bike.
+Gaston Gamba F1 always wins.Sad but true.
Hedge hog Except for in a straight line. :-)
In a drag race.
The road race was the North West 200 which has a pretty smooth road surface but you go off road it’s a walk or tree that stops you.
Remove the wing off the F1 and lets see what happens then
hairlesheep flying to the moon and back
When the narrator said the valves springs wont open and close quick enough, surly he means close quick enough as the opening is done by a cam and would open at whatever speed the the cam hits the valve at, or am I wrong?
SW6 just go desmo IMO
I never knew F1's were that fast damn!!
you never saw F1 at TV ? its very popular in France
Kevin Grange Yes i know exactly what F1 im british haha, just didnt know they were that fast!
Daniel Swift some F1 cars have more than 1000 hp
Kevin Grange and think about their horsepower per ton, ridiculous.
+Daniel Swift Well, 0-300kph in clearly under 10 seconds..
I really liked the comparison ! Congratulations
miss those old v10 sounds
Why the hell are they using a cbr 600rr instead of a cbr 1000rr?
F1 vs anything F1 will win
I remember a painful video a few years ago; I believe it was a Grand Prix car vs a Toyota Corolla on a short inside drag race, probably no more than 200 yards, and the stupid Corolla won! It may have been Mythbusters or Top Gear. I bet it's on RUclips somewhere. I don't even know if I could stand to watch it again. Pure heresy.
Top Fuel Dragster.
F1 rally I want to see that
MrTURBOJOHN Interesting idea, but where would they be able to race?
SuperN0va gp track with potholes!!!!
That boat steers like an old fiesta i had. There was so much give in the steering wheel. Spent the whole time steering from side to side.
Lol that wheeling though. I'll enjoy my sportbike until I can afford an F1. probably never
Yeah, PROBABLY!!! ;-)
7:07 That F1 sounds fucking mental :O
Why not a motogp bike? Would see more fair
Seem*
+Rasmus farkas and why not a f1 boat
+gsymdzd1 because i assume that the boat is at the top of its category. And i looks like its a prototype made for racing.. The f1 car is definitely as good as it gets in car racing. And its also a prototype made for racing.
A superbike is neither. Its a production motorcycle, heavily modified for road racing
+flip inheck ?? ummm yes yes it is...like waaaaaay faster...lol
+BrappWithMe motovlogs in this is a comparativo between car bike and boat from honda, all of them maybe have the powerfull spec in that moment. for sure is another faster bike and boats
My grandpa was the founder of the powerboat racing strategy that you have to keep at least 48% of the boat off the water, and he did it with pure design and shaping, there was no electronic levers back then
The cameras and sounds are so annoying in this. The drag race is about 10 seconds long but they drag it out for like 30 seconds using repeated clips. So annoying.
Take your own advice. So annoying.
what happened to the audio?
Lol, bike fanboys pulling out the lamest and most ignorant excuses ever. Gotta understand the poor lads, being so paranoid all the time of being hit by bigger vehicles on the streets and getting cooked under the sun and frozen to death in winter can't be good for their brains. Out of the barely intelligent arguments they make:
Get over it, kids: a "real moto gp" bike would not be much faster than this bike, it would be roasted by the car too.
-You talking that bikes back in "da sixties" had crazier designs and features that would help this bike win? Lol, ever bothered to research the craziest designs F1 engineers were able to pull out? Jet powered cars are in the list...without mentioning that if you talk about giving the bike the "proper configuration for drag racing, the same can be done with the F1. Things like removing some ailerons and taking out the power limits of the engine...and you'll end up with a 2000 hp monster that would smoke any bike at 500 kph.
Truth hurts.
Ive heard about those jet cars.....which is exactly what they are, jets on wheels...ovbiously your gonna win.....you must like bragging about how you can beat your sister in a fight as well huh lol
You can only go so fast on a bike....two wheels
why use a wsbk bike and not a gp bike like the m1 or the rc213v
I think Jenson Button is one of the worldwide best car drivers!
what size V10 engine did the F1 car have? it can max out the revs at 24,000
3 litres is the displacement and will max out at around 19000RPM, if you’re still interested 7 years later.
when F1 cars were the powerfull racing car on the planet :D
Are they not anymore?
Nope. F1 cars are the annoying sounding corner turning car with a lousy top speed lousy acceleration and lousy BHP. Now days you can BUY cars for only $300,000 that go faster than an F1 car and sound 10000000000x better.
Poseidon7771 Why were they downgraded?
SomeDudeOnline the future, engineers figured out how to make cars faster for cheap and F1 simply didn't and in their attempt to they made a loud piece of crap that sounds like a vacuum. So basically, engineering fail.
lousy top speed ? yeah 372kmph . really lousy. lousy bhp. yeah 1000hp in quali trim while using less fuel than the v10s really lousy. 300,000 car faster than f1 looooolll . not to mention the v6s were faster than the v10s at Australia and Bahrain
Is that a stock 600cc?
its a bit unfair u need to do it again but next try using a moto GP bike
***** dude no one gives a fuck about your torch lmao. Stop spamming everyone's comments,
***** Lmao, What a pleb.
Ye see this is why we shouldn't have test-tube babies...we get results like you...shame.
8:49 of course
Nice! :)
Anybody know what brand the boat is?
+Poul Hansen home made....
Like the editing on this video
Old old video!!!!
I could have read the description to figure that out.
how many gears are in that f1 car ,I counted 18
A MOTOGP motorcycle would make shit of any F1 car in straight line acceleration.
False hahaha an f1 car is faster in almost any circumstance.
Max Power No, that is incorrect. An F1 car is faster around a track, yes, but it can't match say, an RC213V for pure acceleration. You got your name from The Simpsons, yes? :-)
Max Power moto gp is sligthly faster than f1 car
Max Power in straigth line,go search before make any opinion
Niall Ferris i'd give the acceleration advantage to the Motorcycle as its lighter but top speed it's a tough one. An F1 car can reach speeds exceeding 190MPH while generating around 4 tonnes of Downforce. If Engineers could tinker with the vehicles like they normally would in a competition environment the Top speed would go to the F1 car as it's raw power is undeniable, i would say that if engineers wanted too they could make an F1 car exceed 240Mph but it would be less stable in the corners making it slower around a track. However if you took the vehicles straight out of competition and slapped them into a drag race i'd say the Bike would win due to the F1 car being setup for incredibly fast speeds around corners not Straight line speed.
Either way, both are incredible machines.
Basically if the car or bike stales in the race, you have a problem.
2 seconds later they spoke abput the anti-stale system.
No point in comparing the boat, basic physics dictates that because of the traction from road vs water you will naturally get better acceleration from land vehicles.
Unless you can find a better way to propel the boat (like a jet) and find a way of anchoring it to the surface of the water (like a hydrofoil) to ensure that 100% of force is being applied to propel the boat forwards, it will always lose in a 10 second race.
When starting, Is this full power? I want to know that super
If you time the F1 car's final run from helicopter at roughly late 8:47 to early 8:56 where you get the full run uncut its roughly 8.7sec which is close to carwow's MotoGP best time of 8.6sec which is much quicker than the Redbull RB8 V8, however this is the 2003 BAR Honda at 900hp which isnt quite as powerful as the Ferrari F2004's 960hp or the fastest launching V10 F1 car of the Renault R25 which had roughly 950hp and its fair to say either the F2004 or R25 could achieve a low 8s with a decent launch and Monza wing levels, hard to imagine cars from nearly 20 years ago are still the fastest F1 cars in a straight line, imagine if they used slicks from that last of the V10 eras, also imagine if the regulation hasnt changed for nearly 20 years and they kept on developing the V10s, we'd have 23,000rpm and 1300+hp now, it'd be scary in these cars especially with slicks that weighed 605kg with driver, gear and fluids, the car itself dry would weigh 520kg max with over 1300hp it would be too fast, even with 960hp its still close to 2000hp per ton and smashes modern MotoGP bike's power to weight if they stuck a rider on, we all wish the V10s and these lighter narrower chassis stayed in F1 BUT 2026 rules will narrow the cars again and make them lighter with 1000+hp, lets see how these new beasts go.
Dude you still crying? 😂 H2R would smash this F1 car This F1 had 950 HP 550 kg (2005)
This F1 did a 9.7 seconds quarter mile in 2nd race listen to commentator
MotoGP bike ran 8.2 seconds quarter mile @190 mph on Carwow Rimac 8.4 @174 mph
ruclips.net/video/xsrBL6nqLXI/видео.htmlsi=L1Yddt_IUTNbKBSP
Rimac Nevera 0-100 kph 1.9 sec 0-200 kph 4.2 sec
1/4 mile 8.4 sec on same Runway kid
BMW S1000RR spanked this V10 F1 car off the line and 100 meters
Then this F1 car beat a street legal bike
H2R would be different outcome
H2R smoked Redbull RB8 F1 car
RB8 F1 ran 9.1 seconds quarter mile
H2R is running 9.0 flat @171 mph 😂
H2R did 300 km/h on Speedometer before 1/4 mile
This F1 car got no chance against H2R
Redbull RB8 F1 lost early acceleration mid range acceleration
H2R was Faster everywhere and pulling away Harder on top end
Your 8.7 got exposed bro it ran a 9.2 seconds quarter mile 😂
ruclips.net/video/CgtFJUdasHY/видео.htmlsi=g1WnP1dGoH9obkpl
"950 HP , 550 kg" V10 2005 BAR honda F1 car
It had 930 HP during races and weight with 600 kg with fuel and the driver inside the car
So this car with low fuel will become as low as 525 KG
Still can't do a 8.9 seconds quarter mile
He talks about how it's weird to use a clutch with your hand but it's also in your hand on a bike... Plus it's actually a better idea than a foot actuated clutch.
How about turbo liter bike like H2R, could it match f1?
This type of "power boat" is fast of course, it's for racing, but is totally outclassed with the other 2 vehicles.
They should have done the comparison using a drag boat. At least for a quarter mile it would have been competitive.
The bike was probably owned by some guy from bristol who rode it there, and will ride it home and cost £10k new.
The F1 car came from japan and had a full team of engineers take hours to assemble and take millions and millions of pounds.
To win by 4/10ths of a second..
Juzh123 oh course. that F1 car was probably owned by some guy from hertfordshire, Cost £35k brand new and drove it to/from the race
+UniversalGamingUK f1 car is from brackley
to win in a drag race which the f1 car is not made for as its main purpose is for turning and being the fastest on track using downforce and power to weight ratio...
The pull on the F1 car is crazy
Vroom Vroom, ........................................... splish... splash
What an amazing comparison!
Not really. That boat was way too underpowered. There are jet skis which are more powerful than that. A drag boat would be more fitting. Also, they could've used a MotoGP motorcycle (which is pretty much superior to an SBK motorcycle) and then it would be a fair race.
Boat with a flying start ! LMAO
6:58 race start.
Oh my God , just look how young Jenson was .
That fricking pull is crazy!!!
These kind of videos remind me how much I love RUclips
If that bike had a longer swing arm I'd imagine it would put power down much better.
You can’t possibly tell me that boat would be a better choice than a SUPERCHARGED jet ski ?
5:58 Hasegawa san (2016＆2017 the chief of Honda f1 project)
The fans blowing through the radiator while starting the engine of the F1 racecar don't cool the engine. They heat the engine up because the pistons are actually compression fit and in order for the engine to be running it needs to be heated to operating temperature so the block can expand and let the pistons loose.
What they are doing ? was it fair race? Where was the power boat f1 and motogp bike?