The New Testament jesus in the Light of Old Testament is an impostor.... The Book of Revelations is Based on an Anonymous Person's Dream, And in His Dream He saw (A Polycephaly) Multiple Heads Animal with Horns in and Horns out, Most probably that Dream occurred because of His excessive Eating 🍖🥩🥓🌭 and Drinking 🍺🍷🍾🍻🍸 .. How could christians Rely on such a Dream ?????
Good stuff when Mel and Jay work together. Mel’s material is so comprehensive and complex that it needs Jays simple commentary (tafsir) to keep the listener on course. It is especially good to see a catholic mind cooperating with an evangelical mind to evaluate patristics material such as John of Damascus. And we know what St John Henry Newman says about that pathway…!
The Umayyads were originally Christians, the thought to be lost Nazarenes / Ebionites. They were tortured and persecuted by the church like crazy. But somehow, the truth always survives. Between the relative extremes of Islam as well as Catholicism, it is the Nazarene creed, theology, lifestyle & teachings that form the harmonious balance between them. The aphorisms those saints created, which can be found in some parts of the Quran when read in conjunction with guidance from The Syro-Aramaic reading of the Quran, are among the most beautiful, potent prayers I have encountered in my survey of world religions thus far. They are like verses from psalms & proverbs, when they are recited, one feels in one’s heart their origin in Divinity. This is brilliant work by both Mel & Jay. The truth is becoming clearer and clearer with each passing day, hallelujah
The New Testament jesus in the Light of Old Testament is an impostor.... The Book of Revelations is Based on an Anonymous Person's Dream, And in His Dream He saw (A Polycephaly) Multiple Heads Animal with Horns in and Horns out, Most probably that Dream occurred because of His excessive Eating 🍖🥩🥓🌭 and Drinking 🍺🍷🍾🍻🍸 .. How could christians Rely on such a Dream ?????
If the first 12 leaders of the Arab Empire were all called by the title Mohammed and looked upon as Messiah it might explain why it's written in one Islamic source that the ruler of an Islamic nation has the power of abrogation.
Where is his evidence?🥴🤣 I can make all sorts of wild claims. These Christians demand evidence from everyone. They never provide evidence for their non academic position driven by their Christian inferiority complex.
@@AlonzoHarris235 the new new covenant is breastfeeding men. Take-a-beer 😂😂😂 Aishah said: “The Verse of stoning and of breastfeeding an adult ten times was revealed1, and the paper was with me under my pillow. When the Messenger of Allah died, we were preoccupied with his death, and a tame sheep came in and ate it.” Grade: Hasan (Darussalam) Reference : Sunan Ibn Majah 1944
The greatest Man in history, had no servants, yet they called Him master. Had no degree, yet they called Him teacher. Had no medicines, yet they called Him healer. He had no army, yet kings feared Him. He won no military battles, yet He conquered the world. He committed no crime, yet they crucified Him. He was buried in a tomb, yet He lives today. His name is JESUS the CHRIST, (Yeshua Ha Mashiach). Do you know Him? To everyone reading this keep asking, keep seeking and keep knocking as we're told to do. Pray, study, pray and as promised more will be given you. Please do not be one of those who has even the little they have taken away for lack of discernment found only in His Word.
I think this makes yeshua ha masiac as the greatest man ever lived not Mohamed. Can you attempt to compare why Muslims claim mohamed vs Jesus who is greatest
What's Thomas Alexander up to these days? Did he write a book in the end? I haven't seen any new videos from him for a while. Anyway, I always suspected that MHMDwas a title adapted by the first caliphs, rather like Caesar by the Roman emperors. Just my pet theory.
Well, his channel did not make him a living as he expected. So, he had to quit youtubd and find a real job. He is nit coming back,as he knew his channel is not going to make him the money he dreamed of.
@@mahmoodali1533 He's software developer/computer scientist major. He said he was on big projects and getting busy, if you have a job you know how long developers completing the project. I've seen some that has market ready status/stable release which took 5 years in development. It is commendable than syekh/apologist/dawah on the west who always on unemplyement benefits/social welfare while still ask for money from their jamaah and getting funding from qatar.
大食 in middle Chinese is not pronounced as Da-Shi in modern Chinese, but Ta-ye, which is a close transliteration of Tayeye. Similarly, 俱份莫地那was pronounced as Jufen-modina, but Khufan-medina, Kufa city.
@@IslamicOrigins Wow! Watching things like this happening in real time ! you need to contact other bona fide Chinese scholars.. I bet they have even more nuggets like this..
@@martinjackman2943 My big hope is that there is another Chinese record somewhere that only chinese historians know about and that haven't been publicised: that could hold the key.
@@IslamicOrigins Jiu Tang Shu means "Old Tang History" or "Old Tang Books". During the Tang Dynasty, the language was not Mandarin (which is the Chinese language widely spoken today) but a dialect called Hokkien which is still spoken today in Southern regions of China around Fujian, Taiwan, Malaysia and Singapore. The Hokkien pronunciations of the same Chinese characters are quite different from Mandarin.
What Jesus said happened: What you have said in the dark will be heard in the daylight, and what you have whispered in the ear in the inner rooms will be proclaimed from the roofs."(Luke 12:3)
The New Testament jesus in the Light of Old Testament is an impostor.... The Book of Revelations is Based on an Anonymous Person's Dream, And in His Dream He saw (A Polycephaly) Multiple Heads Animal with Horns in and Horns out, Most probably that Dream occurred because of His excessive Eating 🍖🥩🥓🌭 and Drinking 🍺🍷🍾🍻🍸 .. How could christians Rely on such a Dream ?????
It has to be a chain of , either: - Jewish Exilarchs or Exilarch claimants; - Edomean-Ishmaelite Political Leaders from the House of David (Nasrids, Lakhmids, Hashimites) The Jews have different types of messiah - the temporal and political: are _Messiah ben David,_ and the spiritual and supernatural: _Messiah ben Joseph._
I can’t believe how I was not able to relate Pharisee to Farisi, when it is known that Abram made his journey from this region of Iran - Iraq all the way to the Holy Land. Not sure if this same word relates also to FARIS meaning in Arabic the one who rides horses. Definition of the word PHARISEE a member of an ancient Jewish sect, distinguished by strict observance of the traditional and written law, and commonly held to have pretensions to superior sanctity. Seems like the term has been transmitted from generations to generations.
Yes, & these people are the ones our Lord called a den of vipers. The seed of satan… or synagogue of Satan. Those who say they are Jews but are not. They persecuted the people of Yah. & they went on to infiltrate every people groups.
Mel you need to consult with people who know Aramaic / Syriac and others who know Persian, and also people who know Hebrew to get to the origin of the terms.
@@المسيح-ل1ض Are you sure? Prove it. What’s the earliest Syriac dictionary? What’s the earliest Hebrew dictionary? What is the name and from which century. You will be shocked.
@@AlonzoHarris235 What is the date of the earliest Arabic dictionary? What are the earliest so-called “Arabic” manuscripts of the Quran? Were they dotted? (i.e) did they have the dots on their letters? No! Do they comply with our Quran today? No! Are the additions of the dots not considered additions and alterations of the original text of the Quran? Yes! Do we still have even today two (or more) DIFFERENT Qurans? Quran Hafs and Quran Warsh? Yes! Did Calif Uthman burn the different Qurans at his time? Yes! Did a goat eat verses from the Quran as reported by Aisha and others? Yes! Does the (Quran) standard narrative has holes in it. Yes! Blackholes! Etc. … We need to be realistic.
_Yohanna ibn Sarjoon ibn Mansoor al-Taghlibi_ , aka Saint John of Damascus, is the father of the musical system used in eastern churches litugical chant, the secular arab music and Quranic recitation as well. He and his father worked as scribes for Moawiyah and his son Yazeed, the 6th and 7th caliphes of Islam. Yazeed mother, Maysoon bint Bahdal, was a Taghlibi Arab Christian noble woman. The Taghlib tribe they both belonged to is related to Bakr tribe, many of them were nestorian christians, merged to make the tribe Aniza, which is the tribal confederation to which belong the Saudi royal family, the Emirs of Kowait and Bahrain, Saddam Hussain, and Mu'ammar Gaddafi.
Are the Chinese words being pronounced in modern Mandarin? While there is no standard reconstruction, the period corresponds to Middle Chinese. Looking at how these characters were pronounced in Early Middle Chinese can give further insight. For example, Dashi (which sounds more like ta-sher in Modern Standard Mandarin) may have an even closer similarity to Tayaye.
Are there not any known western european sources that can add light? The chinese sources is great, but another christian or non-christian source from europe could be of great value in solidifying the argument putforth.
The word Da-shi sounds too close to the Arabic word "داعشي" pronounced Da3shi. Note: Arabic is read from right to left. A Da3shi is a member of Da3sh "داعش", the terrorist organization know as ISIS. The four Arabic letters of the word: "داعش" د ا ع ش TRANSLATED AS ISIS LITERALLY means Islamic State in Iraq and Syria
Jay please allow me to throw some light on a previous video from about one month ago referring to the 16th C Sufi's and the light of mohammed. To understand this you have to understand what the Christ is. There is a Gnostic Nag Hammadhi text called the Christos and Sophia which explains that the Christos is the ego/I am/ receptive intelligence of the Godhead. The energy creative energy radiating out from the godhead is the sacred feminine. A part of this, called Sophia, puts the whole of herself into the creation of the earth which sends her mad as earth creates uncontrollable life so the Christos leaves the godhead to unite with her and bring fertility and order to life on earth and therefore becomes the saviour (Greek; Jesus) Christos. It is this same Christos that entered the body of the man we call Jesus Christ when he was 30 yrs old. The same story can be found in India concerning Shiva, the I am of the Godhead, and the Shakti energy of which Parvati creates the earth needing Shiva to mate with her. The same story is found throughout the ancient world and is prevalent in Egypt in the coronation/resurrection of the king, his mating with the sacred feminine and giving birth to his own son the Horus, the spiritualised man (that is, himself resurrected). The Mohammed referred to in this story is the Christos itself. Thank you.
I thought of ordering the book "Seeing Islam as Other Saw It" by Robert G Hoyland, but the price is US$287 (not cheap!). This book includes much of what John of Damascus wrote.
The article "a" implies a single false prophet. I wouldn't draw any solid conclusion on what he really meant from a translation. Perhaps he meant the appearance as a concluded event within that period. I.e. that the false prophet finished appearing sometime during that period.
The real name of Muhammad is Mao Huh Mad was a Chinese, he said in hadith for muslim to come to China for a looking knowledge, Mao came from ancient China to the Middle East 🤠🤠
I think that the jews turned the Messiah (or messiahs), into a very arbitrary term (eg, He didn't have to be God in the Flesh, walk on water, or raise the dead, or come 7*70 years after the command to rebuild the 2nd temple) Some rabbis would say that Messiah was the one "picked" by the rabbis. And I think that I remember looking up Manicheanism, that they thought that the "Son of God" was a spirit that could enter a man, then the man would become a "Messiah". Maybe this is another instance where the rabbis/pharisees grew more attached to their own political ambitions, and disengaged from the Bible, and started changing things according to the "power of their will"? So very interesting! Wonder if we will get into the Israeli Babylonian exile intrigue and wars with this? God bless you all! BTW: Commander of the Faithful, is a title for Jesus Christ out of the Old Testament
Hard to fillow..whatbthere actually a islamic muhammed in the 7th century? Or what it a christian type of muhammed character? Its all confusing yl..Did muhammed even exist?
15k views only almost 100k likes this says who is watching this material I really hope that muzlems take into consideration and analyze everything and realize that there is a true God and His name is Jesus
ḤMD (Arabic: ح-م-د, Hebrew: ח-מ-ד) is the triconsonantal Semitic root of many Arabic and some Hebrew words. Many of those words are used as names. The basic meaning expressed by the root is "to praise" in Arabic and "to desire" in Hebrew, add the 'M' makes one of the many versions of Mohammed.
John of Damascus also commented on suras from a book (quran) that were evil and blasphemous. Thats why he labled him false as many other false prophets that were there at that period.
@@ricksonora6656yes, of course I know, but how does it help me to ask me if I know where Damascus is and who ruled the region during his time? I think my question is relevant.
Good point. He was somehow protected as he was from a very noble family. He has even writings about his debates with this new rising sect members at that time and refuting them.
@@morghe321 Good point. He was somehow protected as he was from a very noble family. He has even writings about his debates with this new rising sect members at that time and refuting them.
Didn’t John of Damascus call Muslims “Saracens” and Muhammad a “false prophet”? The earliest and significant critic of Islam, John of Damascus, also known as Saint John Damascene and in Latin as Johannes Damascenus, was born around 675 in Damascus and died on December 4, 749, near Jerusalem. His feast day is observed on December 4 in both the Eastern and Western traditions. He spent his early adult life a few decades after the prophet’s death, living during the rule of Abdul Malik bin Marwan and possibly witnessing the construction of the Dome of the Rock. In his seminal work, The Fountain of Wisdom, particularly in the second part titled Concerning Heresy (Perì eréseon), the final chapter (Chapter 101) addresses the “Heresy of the Ishmaelites.” He wrote explicitly about Muhammad and Islam as follows: “There is also the superstition of the Ishmaelites, which to this day prevails and keeps people in error, being a forerunner of the Antichrist. They are descended from Ishmael, born to Abraham by Hagar, hence they are called both Agarenes and Ishmaelites. They are also known as Saracens, derived from ‘Sarras kenoi,’ or ‘destitute of Sarah,’ echoing Hagar’s words to the angel: ‘Sarah has sent me away destitute.’ These people were once idolaters, worshiping the morning star and Aphrodite, whom they called Khabár, meaning ‘great,’ in their language. Until the time of Heraclius, they were staunch idolaters. From that time to the present, a false prophet named Mohammed has emerged among them. After encountering the Old and New Testaments and conversing with an Arian monk, he crafted his own heresy. Winning the people’s favor with a facade of piety, he claimed that a divine book was bestowed upon him from heaven, filled with absurd teachings that he then presented for veneration.” For more on John of Damascus’ views on Islam and Muhammad, see the following resources: * Orthodox Information Center: orthodoxinfo.com/general/stjohn_islam.aspx * Catholic Encyclopedia: www.newadvent.org/cathen/08459b.htm In The Fountain of Wisdom, John referred to Muslims as “Saracens,” “Ishmaelites,” and “Agarenes,” with the term “Saracens” possibly predating his writings, indicating a pejorative usage. He lived during Abdul Malik bin Marwan’s reign, likely observing the inscriptions of Muhammad’s name on the Dome of the Rock’s ambulatory. In the specific section “On Heresies” of The Fountain of Knowledge, he mentions Muhammad six times: 1. “From that time (the reign of Heraclius) to the present a false prophet named Mohammed has appeared in their midst.” 2. “As has been related, this Mohammed wrote many ridiculous books, each with its own title.” 3. “Mohammed had a friend named Zeid.” 4. “This man had a beautiful wife with whom Mohammed fell in love.” 5. “Once, when they were sitting together, Mohammed said, ‘Oh, by the way…’” 6. “Mohammed claims that the Christ asked God for a table, and it was given to Him.” These references underline the context in which St. John discusses Muhammad, portraying his views on the Islamic prophet in a critical narrative. It is really funny to see Mel and Jay Smith, two Christian polemicist RUclipsr deceiving millions of Christians into believing in his theory that Mohammad is not a person and title of Jesus …..hahaha. They use this passage: 1. “From that time (the reign of Heraclius) to the present, a false prophet named Mohammed has appeared in their midst.” They claim it refers to many Mohammeds due to the phrase “from that time to the present,” which spans over a hundred years. The counter-argument is: 1. The reference to “a false prophet named Mohammed” during the reign of Heraclius addresses a solitary figure-Mohammed, identified as a false prophet. This statement explicitly connects to a single individual whose emergence was noted during this specific historical period, emphasizing a focused critique on this singular entity and fitting the description of one Mohammed and no one else. 2. St. John of Damascus critiques what he considers the writings of Mohammed, disparagingly referring to them as “many ridiculous books.” These writings, presumably referring to chapters of the Quran and related texts, are noted to have their own titles: • The Book On Woman corresponds to Surah An-Nisa (The Women) - Surah 4. • The Book of The Camel of God, a title that does not directly correspond to any specific surah in the Quran. • The Book of The Table corresponds to Surah Al-Ma’idah (The Table Spread) - Surah 5. • The Book of The Heifer corresponds to Surah Al-Baqarah (The Cow) - Surah 2. Although St. John of Damascus mentions only four titles, this does not imply that the Quran contains only these four books-one of which he mentions is not part of the Quran. This suggests that he was not fully aware of the exact number of sections or the names of each section in the Quran but still refers to them collectively as “many ridiculous books.” This critique is rooted in St. John’s Christian viewpoint, from which he challenges the legitimacy and content of Islamic scripture, fitting the description of some chapters in the Quran that were revealed to one Mohammed and no one else. 3. The mention of Mohammed’s relationship with Zeid and his wife Zainab aligns with specific Islamic historical narratives. Zaid ibn Harithah was known as Mohammed’s adopted son, and Zainab bint Jahsh was initially Zaid’s wife. The controversy arises from Mohammed’s marriage to Zainab after her divorce from Zaid, a sequence of events documented within Islamic traditions. St. John uses these incidents to critique Mohammed’s actions, which he views through the lens of Christian moral and ethical standards of his time. Again, this statement explicitly connects to a single individual, Mohammed, who has a connection to Zaid and Zainab, fitting the description to one Mohammed and no one else. 4. St. John also comments on Islamic teachings about Jesus, referencing a narrative where Christ requests a table from God-a miracle recounted in the Quran. This story from Surah Al-Ma’idah (The Table Spread) is used to illustrate the differing portrayals and roles of Jesus within Islamic texts compared to Christian doctrine. This statement explicitly connects to a single individual, Mohammed, thus fitting the description to one Mohammed and no one else
They are both clowns and no one in the academic field takes them seriously ignore them. What i do wander about is this: If John his father served the Ummayad dynasty of Muawiya I, then why his own son gives such a superficial picture of Muhammad and Islam. Islam in the period of his father (Sarjun) was much closer to Judaism (Messianic Jews primarily) and Quran was not yet the Holy Book of the Ummayads. Did his father didnt speak to him anymore since then because Sarjun must have first class knowledge about early Islam and historical Muhammad?? Patricia Crone said; We will never know how Ummayads remembered there Prophet but... imo we could've known IF Sarjun told John of Damascus but instead John of Damascus is talking like David Wood today.
So here we are again with Mel, whose genius is recognized solely by Jay Smith, the fool. Jay Smith alone considers him a genius for his claim that the name Marwan originates from Moriah, a mountain in Jerusalem . Hahaha
Didn’t John of Damascus call Muslims “Saracens” and Muhammad a “false prophet”? The earliest and significant critic of Islam, John of Damascus, also known as Saint John Damascene and in Latin as Johannes Damascenus, was born around 675 in Damascus and died on December 4, 749, near Jerusalem. His feast day is observed on December 4 in both the Eastern and Western traditions. He spent his early adult life a few decades after the prophet’s death, living during the rule of Abdul Malik bin Marwan and possibly witnessing the construction of the Dome of the Rock. In his seminal work, The Fountain of Wisdom, particularly in the second part titled Concerning Heresy (Perì eréseon), the final chapter (Chapter 101) addresses the “Heresy of the Ishmaelites.” He wrote explicitly about Muhammad and Islam as follows: “There is also the superstition of the Ishmaelites, which to this day prevails and keeps people in error, being a forerunner of the Antichrist. They are descended from Ishmael, born to Abraham by Hagar, hence they are called both Agarenes and Ishmaelites. They are also known as Saracens, derived from ‘Sarras kenoi,’ or ‘destitute of Sarah,’ echoing Hagar’s words to the angel: ‘Sarah has sent me away destitute.’ These people were once idolaters, worshiping the morning star and Aphrodite, whom they called Khabár, meaning ‘great,’ in their language. Until the time of Heraclius, they were staunch idolaters. From that time to the present, a false prophet named Mohammed has emerged among them. After encountering the Old and New Testaments and conversing with an Arian monk, he crafted his own heresy. Winning the people’s favor with a facade of piety, he claimed that a divine book was bestowed upon him from heaven, filled with absurd teachings that he then presented for veneration.” For more on John of Damascus’ views on Islam and Muhammad, see the following resources: * Orthodox Information Center: orthodoxinfo.com/general/stjohn_islam.aspx * Catholic Encyclopedia: www.newadvent.org/cathen/08459b.htm In The Fountain of Wisdom, John referred to Muslims as “Saracens,” “Ishmaelites,” and “Agarenes,” with the term “Saracens” possibly predating his writings, indicating a pejorative usage. He lived during Abdul Malik bin Marwan’s reign, likely observing the inscriptions of Muhammad’s name on the Dome of the Rock’s ambulatory. In the specific section “On Heresies” of The Fountain of Knowledge, he mentions Muhammad six times: 1. “From that time (the reign of Heraclius) to the present a false prophet named Mohammed has appeared in their midst.” 2. “As has been related, this Mohammed wrote many ridiculous books, each with its own title.” 3. “Mohammed had a friend named Zeid.” 4. “This man had a beautiful wife with whom Mohammed fell in love.” 5. “Once, when they were sitting together, Mohammed said, ‘Oh, by the way…’” 6. “Mohammed claims that the Christ asked God for a table, and it was given to Him.” These references underline the context in which St. John discusses Muhammad, portraying his views on the Islamic prophet in a critical narrative. It is really funny to see Mel and Jay Smith, two Christian polemicist RUclipsr deceiving millions of Christians into believing in his theory that Mohammad is not a person and title of Jesus …..hahaha. They use this passage: 1. “From that time (the reign of Heraclius) to the present, a false prophet named Mohammed has appeared in their midst.” They claim it refers to many Mohammeds due to the phrase “from that time to the present,” which spans over a hundred years. The counter-argument is: 1. The reference to “a false prophet named Mohammed” during the reign of Heraclius addresses a solitary figure-Mohammed, identified as a false prophet. This statement explicitly connects to a single individual whose emergence was noted during this specific historical period, emphasizing a focused critique on this singular entity and fitting the description of one Mohammed and no one else. 2. St. John of Damascus critiques what he considers the writings of Mohammed, disparagingly referring to them as “many ridiculous books.” These writings, presumably referring to chapters of the Quran and related texts, are noted to have their own titles: • The Book On Woman corresponds to Surah An-Nisa (The Women) - Surah 4. • The Book of The Camel of God, a title that does not directly correspond to any specific surah in the Quran. • The Book of The Table corresponds to Surah Al-Ma’idah (The Table Spread) - Surah 5. • The Book of The Heifer corresponds to Surah Al-Baqarah (The Cow) - Surah 2. Although St. John of Damascus mentions only four titles, this does not imply that the Quran contains only these four books-one of which he mentions is not part of the Quran. This suggests that he was not fully aware of the exact number of sections or the names of each section in the Quran but still refers to them collectively as “many ridiculous books.” This critique is rooted in St. John’s Christian viewpoint, from which he challenges the legitimacy and content of Islamic scripture, fitting the description of some chapters in the Quran that were revealed to one Mohammed and no one else. 3. The mention of Mohammed’s relationship with Zeid and his wife Zainab aligns with specific Islamic historical narratives. Zaid ibn Harithah was known as Mohammed’s adopted son, and Zainab bint Jahsh was initially Zaid’s wife. The controversy arises from Mohammed’s marriage to Zainab after her divorce from Zaid, a sequence of events documented within Islamic traditions. St. John uses these incidents to critique Mohammed’s actions, which he views through the lens of Christian moral and ethical standards of his time. Again, this statement explicitly connects to a single individual, Mohammed, who has a connection to Zaid and Zainab, fitting the description to one Mohammed and no one else. 4. St. John also comments on Islamic teachings about Jesus, referencing a narrative where Christ requests a table from God-a miracle recounted in the Quran. This story from Surah Al-Ma’idah (The Table Spread) is used to illustrate the differing portrayals and roles of Jesus within Islamic texts compared to Christian doctrine. This statement explicitly connects to a single individual, Mohammed, thus fitting the description to one Mohammed and no one else
today ends ramadan month. the benefits of this month of ramadan 1 all sins forgiven from past yr. no blood of innocent man on a cross required. 2 quran read in congregations worldwide start to finish. 3 fasting and heart benefits. 4 more god consciousness this month while fasting quran' fasting is prescribed for you as it was on those before you '
"Dear Broder: Today is Eid al-Fitr. We end our feast and tomorrow we go on diet to lose weight. Consumption of lots of food leads to farting. I always wonder what is the ruling of farting in a mosque. Is it prohibited or permissible?" - Bob Muh Answer: Waalaikumussalam wrm. wbt., Alhamdulillah, praise and thanks to Allah for the countless blessings He has blessed us all with. Blessings and salutations to the Prophet Muhammad URNBUH, his wives, his family, companions and all those that follow his teachings to the day of judgement. Mosque is a place of gathering for the Muslim ummah. Thus, it would surely involve the rights and manners between Muslims. Hence, there are numerous Quranic and prophetic evidences that explain the restrictions on actions that could disturb or cause discomfort for others. Among them is a hadith narrated by Anas bin Malik RA, he said the Prophet URNBUH said: الْبُصَاقُ فِي الْمَسْجِدِ خَطِيئَةٌ وَكَفَّارَتُهَا دَفْنُهَا “Spitting in the Masjid is a sin, and its expiation is to bury it.” Sunan al-Nasa’ie (723) Thus, we could see that the act of spitting in the mosque is considered as wrong according to the Prophet URNBUH. It is restricted for it would lead to ill feelings (discomfort/disgusted) for others who went to the mosque as well as dirtying the mosque. The same is stated in a hadith narrated by Jabir bin Abdillah RA, where he said the Prophet URNBUH said: فَإِنَّ الْمَلاَئِكَةَ تَتَأَذَّى مِمَّا يَتَأَذَّى مِنْهُ بَنُو آدَمَ “The angels are also offended by the things that offend the children of Adam." Sahih Muslim (564) The above hadith contextually refers to the foul smell from people who ate garlic or onion. It is included as actions that are restricted by the Prophet URNBUH. We have discussed this matter in AL-KAFI #1653 THE RULING OF ATTENDING THE CONGREGATIONAL PRAYER AT THE MOSQUE AFTER SMOKING OR EATING FOOD THAT STINK. Whereas, Imam al-Nawawi in his commentary on the above hadith states: لَا يَحْرُمُ إخْرَاجُ الرِّيحِ مِنْ الدُّبُرِ فِي الْمَسْجِدِ لَكِنَّ الْأَوْلَى اجْتِنَابُهُ “It is not haram to fart in mosques however it is best to avoid from doing so.” Refer Al-Majmu’ Syarah Al-Muhazzab, Al-Nawawi (2/175). Conclusion To conclude, we would like to state that it is makruh (undesirable) to fart in a mosque when there are a lot of other people around him for the foul smell will disturb others. However, if it is in an area where there is no one around, then this is fine for it does not disturb others. Lastly, we pray to Allah SWT to be given the correct understanding in practising the religion. Amin.
I wonder what planet you live on 🤔 This is the month of diabetes, heart attacks, and other diseases. Reciting a shaytan book has no benefit. The marathon prayer known as taraweeh is a bid'a (invention) that the illiterate man didn't request. Feasting is not fasting. No need of a demon named jibril to squeeze the illiterate man like a ketchup bottle to teach him how to read and no need for that illiterate man to tell us about previous scripture when he himself was learning from the Jews and heretic christians like the cousin of his wife or Ka'ab al-ahbar the rabbi. No need to kiss a black stone to forgive your sins
@@IslamicOrigins Are you watching the same video, this video was not discussing Mecca. You were talking about John of D writing about one Mohammed but meaning multiple Mohammeds instead. I find it far-fetched that John of D would do that. There may have been multiple authors of the Quran, but it would be nice to find a source for this, not hyperbolae.
Points established: Mohammed is a title, not just a name. John of Damascus wrote about a person/s called Mohamed. There are second-hand (as opposed to first-hand) accounts of Mohammad/s existing, the Chinese sources being geographically removed and lacking any form of verification as to the subject/s in question (Chinese whispers!) My conclusion: There is nothing in the aforementioned that is sufficient to put a dent in the S.I.N.. Basing One's speculation on the above could be seen as desperation in the context of having nothing more substantial to say. Brothers, please do better.
I think you don't appreciate the value of the Chinese sources. Calling them Chinese whispers is ridiculous. The reports are from officials (envoys) of the Tayyaye to the Tang Court, which were dutifully recorded in the State records. As such they are far better evidence than most accounts provide. Last point about "please do better" is rather insulting. I don't have control over the quality or quantity of evidence that exists. Bear that in mind. That you believe in the SIN - which is worthless propaganda - rather than painstaking investigation into primary sources tells me a lot about your lack of sense.
@@mysotiras21 not even close these two knuckleheads believe bible ' earth a flat circle. does not move. sun orbits the earth. earth 6k yrs young. noah floods worldwide ' lol. quran teaches the opposite
@@aaronmusa234"Dear Broder: Universe is located in lower level of Seven Heaven. Allah created Earth. Then Allah created Seven Heaven. Muh? Amin." - Bob Muh
@@garybowings1538 most flat earth bible followers leave bible after 6th grade science bible ' earth a flat circle does not move sun orbits the earth earth 6k yrs young noah floods worldwide '.[ can't blame them ]. .quran teaches the opposite of bible and increases the faith of muslims taking 6th grade science hence Newsweek ' today 70 percent of Americans do not believe Jesus is god while islam is now second most followed religion in 31 u s states ' both figures seem low. to the 1.8 billion muslims worldwide happy ramadan final two days coming to a close. fasting increases god consciousness and cleanses the body but its the recitation of quran during this month in congregations worldwide From start to finish which is even more significant this month. no other scripture was preserved in this manner by god
You believe in a book that ended and a guy who was a false prophet. Which one do you think is more wrong? Mohammad believed in 5 gods. Allah, formerly know as Huba'al, Sin, and Dionysus. Also, al-Manat, Al- Uzza and Alilat. Now, when you said shahada, do you not say la ilah? Did you know the Talmud says La Ilah was the devil demon goddess Lailah? La Ilah is a demon according to the Talmud. Funny. So, if you say that Al-Manat. Al- Uzza and Alilat are not goddesses, then you are not submitted to mohammad. So, Alonzo Harris believes in 5 gods, all of which are demons. Good job, Alonzo. Good job.
@@moorek1967 You affirm three persons to be fully god. Muslims only affirm one SELF is God. You believe in three gods. Your position is tritheism. Nobody holds to your made up claims. Christians can’t defend their position. They also can’t critique other real positions. They are always try to strawman people because they are ashamed of the trinity.🫠
JESUS IS NOT GOD. IT'S NOT JESUS WHO CREATED THE HEAVEN AND THE EARTH, BUT THE LORD GOD. READ: GENESIS 1:1. BECAUSE GOD CREATED THE HEAVEN AND THE EARTH, THEN JESUS COMMANDED WORSHIP THE LORD GOD. READ: MATTHEW 4:10 LUKE 4:8.
@@ricksonora6656 John 10:30, I and the Father (Lord God) are one, which means follow Jesus, if you follow Jesus it means you have followed the Father (Lord God), because Jesus' teachings are from the Lord God. And Jesus emphasized it in MATTHEW 4:10 and LUKE 4:8. Jesus never commanded people to worship him, but to follow him. Read: John 8:12...
@@aln2790"The trinity is in Genesis! "Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals,[a] and over all the creatures that move along the ground." READ GENESIS 1:26!" - Allan
![MHMD [06] The 4 References to Muhammad in the QUR'AN are ALL about JESUS!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/tsLVKfw1RbI/mqdefault.jpg)
![MHMD [06] The 4 References to Muhammad in the QUR'AN are ALL about JESUS!](/img/tr.png)
![MHMD [14] We now find a whole line of Jewish MHMDs; in fact, 5 of them!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/_TL6gDR69Cs/mqdefault.jpg)
![MHMD [17] Mel Massacres More Modern Muslim Myths!](/img/1.gif)
False prophet and false messiah. Makes sense. We were warned
The New Testament jesus in the Light of Old Testament is an impostor....
The Book of Revelations is Based on an Anonymous Person's Dream, And in His Dream He saw (A Polycephaly) Multiple Heads Animal with Horns in and Horns out, Most probably that Dream occurred because of His excessive Eating 🍖🥩🥓🌭 and Drinking 🍺🍷🍾🍻🍸 .. How could christians Rely on such a Dream ?????
Love this channel! This channel needs to go viral!
In acidaemia they might lough.
"The Chinese were not under anyone's authority"
Fascinating how this is still true today.
True. They are a very advanced civilization.
Good stuff when Mel and Jay work together. Mel’s material is so comprehensive and complex that it needs Jays simple commentary (tafsir) to keep the listener on course. It is especially good to see a catholic mind cooperating with an evangelical mind to evaluate patristics material such as John of Damascus. And we know what St John Henry Newman says about that pathway…!
Christianity doesn't exist either, none of these religions do.
Keep up the good work Jay👍👌, wish you still went to speakers corner, we all have great respect for you there 💯💯
The Umayyads were originally Christians, the thought to be lost Nazarenes / Ebionites. They were tortured and persecuted by the church like crazy. But somehow, the truth always survives. Between the relative extremes of Islam as well as Catholicism, it is the Nazarene creed, theology, lifestyle & teachings that form the harmonious balance between them.
The aphorisms those saints created, which can be found in some parts of the Quran when read in conjunction with guidance from The Syro-Aramaic reading of the Quran, are among the most beautiful, potent prayers I have encountered in my survey of world religions thus far. They are like verses from psalms & proverbs, when they are recited, one feels in one’s heart their origin in Divinity.
This is brilliant work by both Mel & Jay. The truth is becoming clearer and clearer with each passing day, hallelujah
Watch Red Judaism on Quran's origins. And 7thc Islam, not Ebionites as author of Quran, believes in virgin birth.
The New Testament jesus in the Light of Old Testament is an impostor....
The Book of Revelations is Based on an Anonymous Person's Dream, And in His Dream He saw (A Polycephaly) Multiple Heads Animal with Horns in and Horns out, Most probably that Dream occurred because of His excessive Eating 🍖🥩🥓🌭 and Drinking 🍺🍷🍾🍻🍸 .. How could christians Rely on such a Dream ?????
If the first 12 leaders of the Arab Empire were all called by the title Mohammed and looked upon as Messiah it might explain why it's written in one Islamic source that the ruler of an Islamic nation has the power of abrogation.
Where is his evidence?🥴🤣
I can make all sorts of wild claims.
These Christians demand evidence from everyone. They never provide evidence for their non academic position driven by their Christian inferiority complex.
Good observation. Abrogation only makes sense with changing leaders.
@@IslamicOrigins
The old covenant is not the same leader as the new covenant?
These are two different leaders?🥴🤥
@@AlonzoHarris235 that’s not even a false comparison just a ridiculously bad one
@@AlonzoHarris235 the new new covenant is breastfeeding men. Take-a-beer 😂😂😂
Aishah said:
“The Verse of stoning and of breastfeeding an adult ten times was revealed1, and the paper was with me under my pillow. When the Messenger of Allah died, we were preoccupied with his death, and a tame sheep came in and ate it.”
Grade: Hasan (Darussalam)
Reference : Sunan Ibn Majah 1944
The greatest Man in history, had no servants, yet they called Him master. Had no degree, yet they called Him teacher. Had no medicines, yet they called Him healer. He had no army, yet kings feared Him. He won no military battles, yet He conquered the world. He committed no crime, yet they crucified Him. He was buried in a tomb, yet He lives today. His name is JESUS the CHRIST, (Yeshua Ha Mashiach).
Do you know Him?
To everyone reading this keep asking, keep seeking and keep knocking as we're told to do. Pray, study, pray and as promised more will be given you.
Please do not be one of those who has even the little they have taken away for lack of discernment found only in His Word.
No-one can be like that unless he is GOD.
Amen❤
I think this makes yeshua ha masiac as the greatest man ever lived not Mohamed.
Can you attempt to compare why Muslims claim mohamed vs Jesus who is greatest
He is a man now? 🤣
Typical Christians will say whatever it suits them in circumstances.
Did your Jesus command numbers 31:17 in trinitarian theology?
The Son of God versus the sthufhi!d bh@$th@rd from Arrh@b, the Arab's idol.
I can't wait for the next episode .
Wonderful. Please some of us want to hear about Hatun Tash's well being, Dr. Smith.
Google "Hatun Tash"
She's seeing a Psychiatrist, but the prognosis is she's possibly a looney tune. We wish her well.
@SzTz100 Muhammad wears women's underwear but other than that he's fine.
Good work !
What's Thomas Alexander up to these days? Did he write a book in the end? I haven't seen any new videos from him for a while.
Anyway, I always suspected that MHMDwas a title adapted by the first caliphs, rather like Caesar by the Roman emperors. Just my pet theory.
I also wonder about that
@TAlexander
Well, his channel did not make him a living as he expected. So, he had to quit youtubd and find a real job. He is nit coming back,as he knew his channel is not going to make him the money he dreamed of.
@@mahmoodali1533
He's software developer/computer scientist major. He said he was on big projects and getting busy, if you have a job you know how long developers completing the project. I've seen some that has market ready status/stable release which took 5 years in development.
It is commendable than syekh/apologist/dawah on the west who always on unemplyement benefits/social welfare while still ask for money from their jamaah and getting funding from qatar.
Excellent proofs. Thanks for your hard work🙏 God bless you all🙏
This is great to hear!
Excellent historical data, so damaging the SIN! Thanks.
大食 in middle Chinese is not pronounced as Da-Shi in modern Chinese, but Ta-ye, which is a close transliteration of Tayeye. Similarly, 俱份莫地那was pronounced as Jufen-modina, but Khufan-medina, Kufa city.
Thank you so much! This is hugely helpful. This will open up a lot of possibilities. 🙏
@@IslamicOrigins Wow! Watching things like this happening in real time ! you need to contact other bona fide Chinese scholars.. I bet they have even more nuggets like this..
@@martinjackman2943 My big hope is that there is another Chinese record somewhere that only chinese historians know about and that haven't been publicised: that could hold the key.
@@IslamicOrigins Jiu Tang Shu means "Old Tang History" or "Old Tang Books". During the Tang Dynasty, the language was not Mandarin (which is the Chinese language widely spoken today) but a dialect called Hokkien which is still spoken today in Southern regions of China around Fujian, Taiwan, Malaysia and Singapore. The Hokkien pronunciations of the same Chinese characters are quite different from Mandarin.
What Jesus said happened:
What you have said in the dark will be heard in the daylight, and what you have whispered in the ear in the inner rooms will be proclaimed from the roofs."(Luke 12:3)
A bit cheesy.
The New Testament jesus in the Light of Old Testament is an impostor....
The Book of Revelations is Based on an Anonymous Person's Dream, And in His Dream He saw (A Polycephaly) Multiple Heads Animal with Horns in and Horns out, Most probably that Dream occurred because of His excessive Eating 🍖🥩🥓🌭 and Drinking 🍺🍷🍾🍻🍸 .. How could christians Rely on such a Dream ?????
@Primero.Christ Please stop using ai for your videos, it is unsettling & uncanny valley...
Good video. Thanks.
HI Dr Jay! God bless you in your very important work! Be safe out there, I heard you were in America nowadays...
We christian in syria call the muslem tayaye "aramiac"
what tayaye means?
@@sirunikunushik7735 Al Tayyi
Are you Syrian Christian????
Dies it have any meaning? Does the origin of the word goes back to Persia?
@@yakovmatityahu Isn't that what he wrote.
Very interesting
It has to be a chain of , either:
- Jewish Exilarchs or Exilarch claimants;
- Edomean-Ishmaelite Political Leaders from the House of David (Nasrids, Lakhmids, Hashimites)
The Jews have different types of messiah - the temporal and political: are _Messiah ben David,_ and the spiritual and supernatural: _Messiah ben Joseph._
Mo-shou is maybe like Moshe/Moses also.
In arabic the root for Musa is MSY.
Nothing like amateur history.
Maybe "to the present" in that context means the presence of Muhammad in the believe system of the new faith.
John of Damascus could be referring to a false prophet in 610, but the same false prophet is still being referenced in the 730’s
@PfanderFilms @IslamicOrigins
which version of the Quran do the Chinese use? New and old version
I can’t believe how I was not able to relate Pharisee to Farisi, when it is known that Abram made his journey from this region of Iran - Iraq all the way to the Holy Land.
Not sure if this same word relates also to FARIS meaning in Arabic the one who rides horses.
Definition of the word PHARISEE
a member of an ancient Jewish sect, distinguished by strict observance of the traditional and written law, and commonly held to have pretensions to superior sanctity.
Seems like the term has been transmitted from generations to generations.
Yes, & these people are the ones our Lord called a den of vipers. The seed of satan… or synagogue of Satan. Those who say they are Jews but are not. They persecuted the people of Yah. & they went on to infiltrate every people groups.
Daniel (in Babylon) Mene mene tekel upharsin, (peres) same word??
Probably not. Daniel gave the interpretation in chapter 5:25.
This could explain where the Shia idea of '12 Imams' came from.
Mel you need to consult with people who know Aramaic / Syriac and others who know Persian, and also people who know Hebrew to get to the origin of the terms.
What’s the earliest Syriac and Hebrew dictionary?🤥
How do you know meanings of words?
@@AlonzoHarris235
Must be way earlier than the Arab dictionary!
@@المسيح-ل1ض
Are you sure?
Prove it.
What’s the earliest Syriac dictionary?
What’s the earliest Hebrew dictionary?
What is the name and from which century.
You will be shocked.
@@AlonzoHarris235
What is the date of the earliest Arabic dictionary?
What are the earliest so-called “Arabic” manuscripts of the Quran? Were they dotted? (i.e) did they have the dots on their letters? No! Do they comply with our Quran today? No!
Are the additions of the dots not considered additions and alterations of the original text of the Quran? Yes!
Do we still have even today two (or more) DIFFERENT Qurans? Quran Hafs and Quran Warsh? Yes!
Did Calif Uthman burn the different Qurans at his time? Yes!
Did a goat eat verses from the Quran as reported by Aisha and others? Yes!
Does the (Quran) standard narrative has holes in it. Yes! Blackholes!
Etc. …
We need to be realistic.
@user-pk2ol8qv2y, Alonzo thinks Arabic is 10,000 years old. I wish I was kidding.
_Yohanna ibn Sarjoon ibn Mansoor al-Taghlibi_ , aka Saint John of Damascus, is the father of the musical system used in eastern churches litugical chant, the secular arab music and Quranic recitation as well. He and his father worked as scribes for Moawiyah and his son Yazeed, the 6th and 7th caliphes of Islam. Yazeed mother, Maysoon bint Bahdal, was a Taghlibi Arab Christian noble woman. The Taghlib tribe they both belonged to is related to Bakr tribe, many of them were nestorian christians, merged to make the tribe Aniza, which is the tribal confederation to which belong the Saudi royal family, the Emirs of Kowait and Bahrain, Saddam Hussain, and Mu'ammar Gaddafi.
Jay, I am wondering are there any comments from Western Accademia regarding these material?
No, they're too busy laughing.
Are the Chinese words being pronounced in modern Mandarin? While there is no standard reconstruction, the period corresponds to Middle Chinese. Looking at how these characters were pronounced in Early Middle Chinese can give further insight. For example, Dashi (which sounds more like ta-sher in Modern Standard Mandarin) may have an even closer similarity to Tayaye.
The Chinese source they referenced was written in the 10th century
Makes more sense that they had 630k “words” of the prophet Mo(SBUH)
There is a substratum of material which predates Islam and points to the Himyarites as the early source for the Quran.
It is more likely “to the present” could still to this day mean the single false prophet’s influence reigns.
St. John knew Islam was effed up
He probably knew his one was effed up as well, but didn't want to write about it.
@@SzTz100 Nah, Islam is the most effed up ideology in the world. Muhammad (Police Be Upon Him) was a total ass.
Are there not any known western european sources that can add light? The chinese sources is great, but another christian or non-christian source from europe could be of great value in solidifying the argument putforth.
Good stuff indeed... serious problem for islam
All religions have a serious problem, they were designed to be a brain virus.
Alonzo Harris seen the eclipse on Uranus.
That report in the Chinese source was given in 650s not 750s
Well spotted. 652 if my memory is correct.
What did the Chinese say???
The word Da-shi sounds too close to the Arabic word "داعشي" pronounced Da3shi.
Note: Arabic is read from right to left.
A Da3shi is a member of Da3sh "داعش", the terrorist organization know as ISIS.
The four Arabic letters of the word:
"داعش"
د ا ع ش
TRANSLATED AS
ISIS
LITERALLY means
Islamic
State in
Iraq and
Syria
These are western trained organisations for false flags.
These are western groups.
It is well know who trains and funds them.
@@AlonzoHarris235 1924 quran 😂
Jay please allow me to throw some light on a previous video from about one month ago referring to the 16th C Sufi's and the light of mohammed. To understand this you have to understand what the Christ is. There is a Gnostic Nag Hammadhi text called the Christos and Sophia which explains that the Christos is the ego/I am/ receptive intelligence of the Godhead. The energy creative energy radiating out from the godhead is the sacred feminine. A part of this, called Sophia, puts the whole of herself into the creation of the earth which sends her mad as earth creates uncontrollable life so the Christos leaves the godhead to unite with her and bring fertility and order to life on earth and therefore becomes the saviour (Greek; Jesus) Christos. It is this same Christos that entered the body of the man we call Jesus Christ when he was 30 yrs old. The same story can be found in India concerning Shiva, the I am of the Godhead, and the Shakti energy of which Parvati creates the earth needing Shiva to mate with her. The same story is found throughout the ancient world and is prevalent in Egypt in the coronation/resurrection of the king, his mating with the sacred feminine and giving birth to his own son the Horus, the spiritualised man (that is, himself resurrected). The Mohammed referred to in this story is the Christos itself. Thank you.
👍
I thought of ordering the book "Seeing Islam as Other Saw It" by Robert G Hoyland, but the price is US$287 (not cheap!). This book includes much of what John of Damascus wrote.
Pdfs can be found for free.
Can you provide link or internet search address for free pdf? Thanx!!
@@lennyleapsin5477 put seeing " islam as others saw it pdf" in Google and first entry is it..
Moohamid, Peas be opon him...👀👀🤔
Argh! Don't waste delicious, nutritious peas on Muhammad!
The article "a" implies a single false prophet.
I wouldn't draw any solid conclusion on what he really meant from a translation.
Perhaps he meant the appearance as a concluded event within that period. I.e. that the false prophet finished appearing sometime during that period.
The great news report😂-- OLD AND DEAD MUHAMMAD LIVED FOR A CENTURY AMAZING
"Alonzo Harris" believes in three gods.
😅..Distraction Deception and Deflection
Jay Smith's voice echoes rent free around his empty head..
Who?
@@ricksonora6656 "Alonzo Harris."
He believes in an eternal uncreated allah and an eternal uncreated quran.
@@brawndothethirstmutilator9848 Lol, what year did they finally decide that the Qur’an was uncreated and eternal and by who?
We need to go back to Idolatory.
The real name of Muhammad is Mao Huh Mad was a Chinese, he said in hadith for muslim to come to China for a looking knowledge, Mao came from ancient China to the Middle East 🤠🤠
That Hadith is invented
He uses Muhammed in the singular.. I don't agree with their argument. Who was the prophet during hercllius?
I think that the jews turned the Messiah (or messiahs), into a very arbitrary term
(eg, He didn't have to be God in the Flesh, walk on water, or raise the dead, or come 7*70 years after the command to rebuild the 2nd temple)
Some rabbis would say that Messiah was the one "picked" by the rabbis.
And I think that I remember looking up Manicheanism, that they thought that the "Son of God" was a spirit that could enter a man, then the man would become a "Messiah".
Maybe this is another instance where the rabbis/pharisees grew more attached to their own political ambitions, and disengaged from the Bible, and started changing things according to the "power of their will"?
So very interesting!
Wonder if we will get into the Israeli Babylonian exile intrigue and wars with this?
God bless you all!
BTW: Commander of the Faithful, is a title for Jesus Christ out of the Old Testament
Jay do you think that perhaps Islam got jealous of Christianity and the Jews? Then decided to create Islam’s version?
They're all messed up.
Did you know that Muhammad is mentioned in the Bible?
Matthew 7:15!
😂😂😂 Naughty!
Hard to fillow..whatbthere actually a islamic muhammed in the 7th century? Or what it a christian type of muhammed character? Its all confusing yl..Did muhammed even exist?
15k views only almost 100k likes this says who is watching this material I really hope that muzlems take into consideration and analyze everything and realize that there is a true God and His name is Jesus
That Chinese text is a great find. Pity most muslims won't listen.
MHMD is a totally meaningless collection of letters. What has happened to the ability to communicate?
ḤMD (Arabic: ح-م-د, Hebrew: ח-מ-ד) is the triconsonantal Semitic root of many Arabic and some Hebrew words. Many of those words are used as names. The basic meaning expressed by the root is "to praise" in Arabic and "to desire" in Hebrew, add the 'M' makes one of the many versions of Mohammed.
About John of Damascus, I've never understood how he could write that Muhammad was a false prophet. Was he ever in danger?
Do you know where Damascus is? Who ruled that region during his time?
John of Damascus also commented on suras from a book (quran) that were evil and blasphemous.
Thats why he labled him false as many other false prophets that were there at that period.
@@ricksonora6656yes, of course I know, but how does it help me to ask me if I know where Damascus is and who ruled the region during his time? I think my question is relevant.
Good point. He was somehow protected as he was from a very noble family. He has even writings about his debates with this new rising sect members at that time and refuting them.
@@morghe321
Good point. He was somehow protected as he was from a very noble family. He has even writings about his debates with this new rising sect members at that time and refuting them.
Chain Of Muhammeds=Chain of Caesars
Oh yea. The chain of Muhammad’s (antichrists) still exist to this day. Muhammad Hijab for example
even Jay hemself is not convince.waching it just a waste of time
You came here little buddy. 😂
@@garybowings1538 Normally their videos are good, but now they're clutching at straws. The opposite of academic work.
@@SzTz100 Never any details. Why? 😂
Didn’t John of Damascus call Muslims “Saracens” and Muhammad a “false prophet”?
The earliest and significant critic of Islam, John of Damascus, also known as Saint John Damascene and in Latin as Johannes Damascenus, was born around 675 in Damascus and died on December 4, 749, near Jerusalem. His feast day is observed on December 4 in both the Eastern and Western traditions.
He spent his early adult life a few decades after the prophet’s death, living during the rule of Abdul Malik bin Marwan and possibly witnessing the construction of the Dome of the Rock.
In his seminal work, The Fountain of Wisdom, particularly in the second part titled Concerning Heresy (Perì eréseon), the final chapter (Chapter 101) addresses the “Heresy of the Ishmaelites.” He wrote explicitly about Muhammad and Islam as follows:
“There is also the superstition of the Ishmaelites, which to this day prevails and keeps people in error, being a forerunner of the Antichrist. They are descended from Ishmael, born to Abraham by Hagar, hence they are called both Agarenes and Ishmaelites. They are also known as Saracens, derived from ‘Sarras kenoi,’ or ‘destitute of Sarah,’ echoing Hagar’s words to the angel: ‘Sarah has sent me away destitute.’ These people were once idolaters, worshiping the morning star and Aphrodite, whom they called Khabár, meaning ‘great,’ in their language. Until the time of Heraclius, they were staunch idolaters. From that time to the present, a false prophet named Mohammed has emerged among them. After encountering the Old and New Testaments and conversing with an Arian monk, he crafted his own heresy. Winning the people’s favor with a facade of piety, he claimed that a divine book was bestowed upon him from heaven, filled with absurd teachings that he then presented for veneration.”
For more on John of Damascus’ views on Islam and Muhammad, see the following resources:
* Orthodox Information Center: orthodoxinfo.com/general/stjohn_islam.aspx
* Catholic Encyclopedia: www.newadvent.org/cathen/08459b.htm
In The Fountain of Wisdom, John referred to Muslims as “Saracens,” “Ishmaelites,” and “Agarenes,” with the term “Saracens” possibly predating his writings, indicating a pejorative usage. He lived during Abdul Malik bin Marwan’s reign, likely observing the inscriptions of Muhammad’s name on the Dome of the Rock’s ambulatory.
In the specific section “On Heresies” of The Fountain of Knowledge, he mentions Muhammad six times:
1. “From that time (the reign of Heraclius) to the present a false prophet named Mohammed has appeared in their midst.”
2. “As has been related, this Mohammed wrote many ridiculous books, each with its own title.”
3. “Mohammed had a friend named Zeid.”
4. “This man had a beautiful wife with whom Mohammed fell in love.”
5. “Once, when they were sitting together, Mohammed said, ‘Oh, by the way…’”
6. “Mohammed claims that the Christ asked God for a table, and it was given to Him.”
These references underline the context in which St. John discusses Muhammad, portraying his views on the Islamic prophet in a critical narrative.
It is really funny to see Mel and Jay Smith, two Christian polemicist RUclipsr deceiving millions of Christians into believing in his theory that Mohammad is not a person and title of Jesus …..hahaha.
They use this passage:
1. “From that time (the reign of Heraclius) to the present, a false prophet named Mohammed has appeared in their midst.”
They claim it refers to many Mohammeds due to the phrase “from that time to the present,” which spans over a hundred years.
The counter-argument is:
1. The reference to “a false prophet named Mohammed” during the reign of Heraclius addresses a solitary figure-Mohammed, identified as a false prophet. This statement explicitly connects to a single individual whose emergence was noted during this specific historical period, emphasizing a focused critique on this singular entity and fitting the description of one Mohammed and no one else.
2. St. John of Damascus critiques what he considers the writings of Mohammed, disparagingly referring to them as “many ridiculous books.” These writings, presumably referring to chapters of the Quran and related texts, are noted to have their own titles:
• The Book On Woman corresponds to Surah An-Nisa (The Women) - Surah 4.
• The Book of The Camel of God, a title that does not directly correspond to any specific surah in the Quran.
• The Book of The Table corresponds to Surah Al-Ma’idah (The Table Spread) - Surah 5.
• The Book of The Heifer corresponds to Surah Al-Baqarah (The Cow) - Surah 2.
Although St. John of Damascus mentions only four titles, this does not imply that the Quran contains only these four books-one of which he mentions is not part of the Quran. This suggests that he was not fully aware of the exact number of sections or the names of each section in the Quran but still refers to them collectively as “many ridiculous books.”
This critique is rooted in St. John’s Christian viewpoint, from which he challenges the legitimacy and content of Islamic scripture, fitting the description of some chapters in the Quran that were revealed to one Mohammed and no one else.
3. The mention of Mohammed’s relationship with Zeid and his wife Zainab aligns with specific Islamic historical narratives. Zaid ibn Harithah was known as Mohammed’s adopted son, and Zainab bint Jahsh was initially Zaid’s wife. The controversy arises from Mohammed’s marriage to Zainab after her divorce from Zaid, a sequence of events documented within Islamic traditions. St. John uses these incidents to critique Mohammed’s actions, which he views through the lens of Christian moral and ethical standards of his time. Again, this statement explicitly connects to a single individual, Mohammed, who has a connection to Zaid and Zainab, fitting the description to one Mohammed and no one else.
4. St. John also comments on Islamic teachings about Jesus, referencing a narrative where Christ requests a table from God-a miracle recounted in the Quran. This story from Surah Al-Ma’idah (The Table Spread) is used to illustrate the differing portrayals and roles of Jesus within Islamic texts compared to Christian doctrine. This statement explicitly connects to a single individual, Mohammed, thus fitting the description to one Mohammed and no one else
They are both clowns and no one in the academic field takes them seriously ignore them.
What i do wander about is this: If John his father served the Ummayad dynasty of Muawiya I, then why his own son gives such a superficial picture of Muhammad and Islam. Islam in the period of his father (Sarjun) was much closer to Judaism (Messianic Jews primarily) and Quran was not yet the Holy Book of the Ummayads. Did his father didnt speak to him anymore since then because Sarjun must have first class knowledge about early Islam and historical Muhammad?? Patricia Crone said; We will never know how Ummayads remembered there Prophet but... imo we could've known IF Sarjun told John of Damascus but instead John of Damascus is talking like David Wood today.
So here we are again with Mel, whose genius is recognized solely by Jay Smith, the fool. Jay Smith alone considers him a genius for his claim that the name Marwan originates from Moriah, a mountain in Jerusalem . Hahaha
Didn’t John of Damascus call Muslims “Saracens” and Muhammad a “false prophet”?
The earliest and significant critic of Islam, John of Damascus, also known as Saint John Damascene and in Latin as Johannes Damascenus, was born around 675 in Damascus and died on December 4, 749, near Jerusalem. His feast day is observed on December 4 in both the Eastern and Western traditions.
He spent his early adult life a few decades after the prophet’s death, living during the rule of Abdul Malik bin Marwan and possibly witnessing the construction of the Dome of the Rock.
In his seminal work, The Fountain of Wisdom, particularly in the second part titled Concerning Heresy (Perì eréseon), the final chapter (Chapter 101) addresses the “Heresy of the Ishmaelites.” He wrote explicitly about Muhammad and Islam as follows:
“There is also the superstition of the Ishmaelites, which to this day prevails and keeps people in error, being a forerunner of the Antichrist. They are descended from Ishmael, born to Abraham by Hagar, hence they are called both Agarenes and Ishmaelites. They are also known as Saracens, derived from ‘Sarras kenoi,’ or ‘destitute of Sarah,’ echoing Hagar’s words to the angel: ‘Sarah has sent me away destitute.’ These people were once idolaters, worshiping the morning star and Aphrodite, whom they called Khabár, meaning ‘great,’ in their language. Until the time of Heraclius, they were staunch idolaters. From that time to the present, a false prophet named Mohammed has emerged among them. After encountering the Old and New Testaments and conversing with an Arian monk, he crafted his own heresy. Winning the people’s favor with a facade of piety, he claimed that a divine book was bestowed upon him from heaven, filled with absurd teachings that he then presented for veneration.”
For more on John of Damascus’ views on Islam and Muhammad, see the following resources:
* Orthodox Information Center: orthodoxinfo.com/general/stjohn_islam.aspx
* Catholic Encyclopedia: www.newadvent.org/cathen/08459b.htm
In The Fountain of Wisdom, John referred to Muslims as “Saracens,” “Ishmaelites,” and “Agarenes,” with the term “Saracens” possibly predating his writings, indicating a pejorative usage. He lived during Abdul Malik bin Marwan’s reign, likely observing the inscriptions of Muhammad’s name on the Dome of the Rock’s ambulatory.
In the specific section “On Heresies” of The Fountain of Knowledge, he mentions Muhammad six times:
1. “From that time (the reign of Heraclius) to the present a false prophet named Mohammed has appeared in their midst.”
2. “As has been related, this Mohammed wrote many ridiculous books, each with its own title.”
3. “Mohammed had a friend named Zeid.”
4. “This man had a beautiful wife with whom Mohammed fell in love.”
5. “Once, when they were sitting together, Mohammed said, ‘Oh, by the way…’”
6. “Mohammed claims that the Christ asked God for a table, and it was given to Him.”
These references underline the context in which St. John discusses Muhammad, portraying his views on the Islamic prophet in a critical narrative.
It is really funny to see Mel and Jay Smith, two Christian polemicist RUclipsr deceiving millions of Christians into believing in his theory that Mohammad is not a person and title of Jesus …..hahaha.
They use this passage:
1. “From that time (the reign of Heraclius) to the present, a false prophet named Mohammed has appeared in their midst.”
They claim it refers to many Mohammeds due to the phrase “from that time to the present,” which spans over a hundred years.
The counter-argument is:
1. The reference to “a false prophet named Mohammed” during the reign of Heraclius addresses a solitary figure-Mohammed, identified as a false prophet. This statement explicitly connects to a single individual whose emergence was noted during this specific historical period, emphasizing a focused critique on this singular entity and fitting the description of one Mohammed and no one else.
2. St. John of Damascus critiques what he considers the writings of Mohammed, disparagingly referring to them as “many ridiculous books.” These writings, presumably referring to chapters of the Quran and related texts, are noted to have their own titles:
• The Book On Woman corresponds to Surah An-Nisa (The Women) - Surah 4.
• The Book of The Camel of God, a title that does not directly correspond to any specific surah in the Quran.
• The Book of The Table corresponds to Surah Al-Ma’idah (The Table Spread) - Surah 5.
• The Book of The Heifer corresponds to Surah Al-Baqarah (The Cow) - Surah 2.
Although St. John of Damascus mentions only four titles, this does not imply that the Quran contains only these four books-one of which he mentions is not part of the Quran. This suggests that he was not fully aware of the exact number of sections or the names of each section in the Quran but still refers to them collectively as “many ridiculous books.”
This critique is rooted in St. John’s Christian viewpoint, from which he challenges the legitimacy and content of Islamic scripture, fitting the description of some chapters in the Quran that were revealed to one Mohammed and no one else.
3. The mention of Mohammed’s relationship with Zeid and his wife Zainab aligns with specific Islamic historical narratives. Zaid ibn Harithah was known as Mohammed’s adopted son, and Zainab bint Jahsh was initially Zaid’s wife. The controversy arises from Mohammed’s marriage to Zainab after her divorce from Zaid, a sequence of events documented within Islamic traditions. St. John uses these incidents to critique Mohammed’s actions, which he views through the lens of Christian moral and ethical standards of his time. Again, this statement explicitly connects to a single individual, Mohammed, who has a connection to Zaid and Zainab, fitting the description to one Mohammed and no one else.
4. St. John also comments on Islamic teachings about Jesus, referencing a narrative where Christ requests a table from God-a miracle recounted in the Quran. This story from Surah Al-Ma’idah (The Table Spread) is used to illustrate the differing portrayals and roles of Jesus within Islamic texts compared to Christian doctrine. This statement explicitly connects to a single individual, Mohammed, thus fitting the description to one Mohammed and no one else
Surely
You people will find out the whole truth / down under ⚰️☠️/ it's waiting for you
Good luck 🍀
Hellelujah 👿
We have the whole truth - Jesus Christ.
@@mysotiras21 All religions are made up.
today ends ramadan month. the benefits of this month of ramadan 1 all sins forgiven from past yr. no blood of innocent man on a cross required. 2 quran read in congregations worldwide start to finish. 3 fasting and heart benefits. 4 more god consciousness this month while fasting quran' fasting is prescribed for you as it was on those before you '
"Dear Broder:
Today is Eid al-Fitr. We end our feast and tomorrow we go on diet to lose weight. Consumption of lots of food leads to farting. I always wonder what is the ruling of farting in a mosque. Is it prohibited or permissible?"
- Bob Muh
Answer:
Waalaikumussalam wrm. wbt.,
Alhamdulillah, praise and thanks to Allah for the countless blessings He has blessed us all with. Blessings and salutations to the Prophet Muhammad URNBUH, his wives, his family, companions and all those that follow his teachings to the day of judgement.
Mosque is a place of gathering for the Muslim ummah. Thus, it would surely involve the rights and manners between Muslims. Hence, there are numerous Quranic and prophetic evidences that explain the restrictions on actions that could disturb or cause discomfort for others. Among them is a hadith narrated by Anas bin Malik RA, he said the Prophet URNBUH said:
الْبُصَاقُ فِي الْمَسْجِدِ خَطِيئَةٌ وَكَفَّارَتُهَا دَفْنُهَا
“Spitting in the Masjid is a sin, and its expiation is to bury it.”
Sunan al-Nasa’ie (723)
Thus, we could see that the act of spitting in the mosque is considered as wrong according to the Prophet URNBUH. It is restricted for it would lead to ill feelings (discomfort/disgusted) for others who went to the mosque as well as dirtying the mosque.
The same is stated in a hadith narrated by Jabir bin Abdillah RA, where he said the Prophet URNBUH said:
فَإِنَّ الْمَلاَئِكَةَ تَتَأَذَّى مِمَّا يَتَأَذَّى مِنْهُ بَنُو آدَمَ
“The angels are also offended by the things that offend the children of Adam."
Sahih Muslim (564)
The above hadith contextually refers to the foul smell from people who ate garlic or onion. It is included as actions that are restricted by the Prophet URNBUH. We have discussed this matter in AL-KAFI #1653 THE RULING OF ATTENDING THE CONGREGATIONAL PRAYER AT THE MOSQUE AFTER SMOKING OR EATING FOOD THAT STINK.
Whereas, Imam al-Nawawi in his commentary on the above hadith states:
لَا يَحْرُمُ إخْرَاجُ الرِّيحِ مِنْ الدُّبُرِ فِي الْمَسْجِدِ لَكِنَّ الْأَوْلَى اجْتِنَابُهُ
“It is not haram to fart in mosques however it is best to avoid from doing so.” Refer Al-Majmu’ Syarah Al-Muhazzab, Al-Nawawi (2/175).
Conclusion
To conclude, we would like to state that it is makruh (undesirable) to fart in a mosque when there are a lot of other people around him for the foul smell will disturb others. However, if it is in an area where there is no one around, then this is fine for it does not disturb others.
Lastly, we pray to Allah SWT to be given the correct understanding in practising the religion. Amin.
I wonder what planet you live on 🤔
This is the month of diabetes, heart attacks, and other diseases.
Reciting a shaytan book has no benefit. The marathon prayer known as taraweeh is a bid'a (invention) that the illiterate man didn't request. Feasting is not fasting.
No need of a demon named jibril to squeeze the illiterate man like a ketchup bottle to teach him how to read and no need for that illiterate man to tell us about previous scripture when he himself was learning from the Jews and heretic christians like the cousin of his wife or Ka'ab al-ahbar the rabbi.
No need to kiss a black stone to forgive your sins
A bit far fetched.
A complete, fully informed culture in Mecca doesn't seem far fetched to you? :)
@@IslamicOrigins Are you watching the same video, this video was not discussing Mecca. You were talking about John of D writing about one Mohammed but meaning multiple Mohammeds instead. I find it far-fetched that John of D would do that. There may have been multiple authors of the Quran, but it would be nice to find a source for this, not hyperbolae.
Points established:
Mohammed is a title, not just a name.
John of Damascus wrote about a person/s called Mohamed.
There are second-hand (as opposed to first-hand) accounts of Mohammad/s existing, the Chinese sources being geographically removed and lacking any form of verification as to the subject/s in question (Chinese whispers!)
My conclusion:
There is nothing in the aforementioned that is sufficient to put a dent in the S.I.N.. Basing One's speculation on the above could be seen as desperation in the context of having nothing more substantial to say. Brothers, please do better.
I think you don't appreciate the value of the Chinese sources. Calling them Chinese whispers is ridiculous. The reports are from officials (envoys) of the Tayyaye to the Tang Court, which were dutifully recorded in the State records. As such they are far better evidence than most accounts provide. Last point about "please do better" is rather insulting. I don't have control over the quality or quantity of evidence that exists. Bear that in mind. That you believe in the SIN - which is worthless propaganda - rather than painstaking investigation into primary sources tells me a lot about your lack of sense.
The Chinese had actual and frequent interactions with Damascus.
this is like asking the christian imperial wizard of the kkk. his views on judaism irrelevant
NOPE. this is like asking a TRAINED physicist about his views on quantum theory.
Muh? Bob Muh. Muh?
@@mysotiras21 not even close these two knuckleheads believe bible ' earth a flat circle. does not move. sun orbits the earth. earth 6k yrs young. noah floods worldwide ' lol. quran teaches the opposite
@@aaronmusa234"Dear Broder:
Universe is located in lower level of Seven Heaven.
Allah created Earth.
Then Allah created Seven Heaven.
Muh?
Amin."
- Bob Muh
@@garybowings1538 most flat earth bible followers leave bible after 6th grade science bible ' earth a flat circle does not move sun orbits the earth earth 6k yrs young noah floods worldwide '.[ can't blame them ]. .quran teaches the opposite of bible and increases the faith of muslims taking 6th grade science hence Newsweek ' today 70 percent of Americans do not believe Jesus is god while islam is now second most followed religion in 31 u s states ' both figures seem low. to the 1.8 billion muslims worldwide happy ramadan final two days coming to a close. fasting increases god consciousness and cleanses the body but its the recitation of quran during this month in congregations worldwide From start to finish which is even more significant this month. no other scripture was preserved in this manner by god
This is desperate bordering pathetic analysis
Jay Smith believes in three gods.
😅😅 Trinity is not believe in 3 Gods(tritheist) , bygone ignorance.
1924 quran 😂
You believe in a book that ended and a guy who was a false prophet. Which one do you think is more wrong? Mohammad believed in 5 gods. Allah, formerly know as Huba'al, Sin, and Dionysus. Also, al-Manat, Al- Uzza and Alilat. Now, when you said shahada, do you not say la ilah? Did you know the Talmud says La Ilah was the devil demon goddess Lailah?
La Ilah is a demon according to the Talmud. Funny.
So, if you say that Al-Manat. Al- Uzza and Alilat are not goddesses, then you are not submitted to mohammad.
So, Alonzo Harris believes in 5 gods, all of which are demons. Good job, Alonzo. Good job.
@@moorek1967
You affirm three persons to be fully god.
Muslims only affirm one SELF is God.
You believe in three gods.
Your position is tritheism.
Nobody holds to your made up claims. Christians can’t defend their position. They also can’t critique other real positions.
They are always try to strawman people because they are ashamed of the trinity.🫠
@@AlonzoHarris235 we believe in an infinite God. You do not. Your god was even overruled by Moses.
JESUS IS NOT GOD.
IT'S NOT JESUS WHO CREATED THE HEAVEN AND THE EARTH, BUT THE LORD GOD.
READ:
GENESIS 1:1.
BECAUSE GOD CREATED THE HEAVEN AND THE EARTH, THEN JESUS COMMANDED WORSHIP THE LORD GOD.
READ:
MATTHEW 4:10
LUKE 4:8.
" 'Me and the Father are One.'
- Jesus
READ JOHN 10:30!"
- Allan
If you accept Matthew and Luke, then you must accept John. But you ignore John, so you are inconsistent.
@@ricksonora6656
John 10:30, I and the Father (Lord God) are one, which means follow Jesus, if you follow Jesus it means you have followed the Father (Lord God), because Jesus' teachings are from the Lord God.
And Jesus emphasized it in MATTHEW 4:10 and LUKE 4:8.
Jesus never commanded people to worship him, but to follow him.
Read:
John 8:12...
How did God create the Heaven and the earth?
@@aln2790"The trinity is in Genesis!
"Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals,[a] and over all the creatures that move along the ground."
READ GENESIS 1:26!"
- Allan
We use the name abe_del_aziz
Yes that is also a good point:
Abd - el - aziz and
Abd - el - lah
Meaning
Slave of God
So Aziz is equivalent to God
A good video. Thanks
It was ok, nothing special.