How do 'intellectuals' fool themselves into thinking an ideology with no real means of measurement from person to person, acting on assumptions of who is and isn't disadvantaged and assumptions of what causes it, with no hard system of categorising who gets what, why they deserve it over another, and what 'disadvantage' trumps another...it's tiring even putting it into words, it goes on forever in a circular logic without any solid foundation, it's mindboggling how they can be touted as the torch bearers of reason and believe one of the most unreasonable outlooks on life, especially equality/equity of outcome, an inherently discriminatory and abhorrent in practice goal to have, heirarchy is inherent, all animals have it and it's unavoidable, the very moment two people do a task and one is better at it, poof, hierarchy, we will never be equal, there's a million ways we can each be better than eachother at various things in life, they're acting on the assumption any and all discrepancy is based on race and gender discrimination first and foremost, then income of family, sexuality and nationality. Remember "i think therefore i am", well for intersectionalists it's "i'm not white male therefore i suffer" they can be middle class or wealthy, beautiful and treated well by all they encounter and still believe this.
Comon IISocratesll!...You have to know that the best college produced resume is awarded by the college to the uneducated, illiterate, leftist so-called student whose parents pay the most for their child's stay.
I spent 16 months working on a database project that required race info for funding. It was insanely complex because there are so many multi-racial humans. Every day was a struggle with bureaucrats who really believe "Hispanic" is a race.
The answer to your question.., paraphrased, how do intellectualls justify this nonsense? Simple answer Post Modernism, a derivative of Neo Marxism, specifically the Frankfurt School. They don't believe in facts and transplanted Marxist theory (economic) directly to Culture. Since Marxism profoundly failed, you'd think they would be careful, but No.
Marxism, was supposed to be a modernist, scientific, materialistic explanation of the world. When the soviet union inevitably failed, and surmounting evidence was clearly brought before the intellectuals that Marxism was wrong, they had a crisis of faith. They had to choose to accept reason, logic and empirical evidence, and reject Marxism (Like Hayek), or to reject reason, logic and empirical evidence. The ones who rejected reason, is what Stephen Hicks calls the "Kierkegaardian" Postmodernists. Kierkegaard and Kant took similar approaches with Christianity when, chrisitianity's natural explanations of the world were proved to be the opposite (IE. Heliocentrism). Kant said "I had to reject reason, to make room for faith". Kierkegaard said "Faith requires the crucifixion of reason". So these postmodernists took this leap of faith. There were others, who believed it was culture that made socialism fail, they believe that Marxism is still scientific, and are yet comfortable enough with the contradicting evidence. These ones outwardly use relativism to disarm you, and when you are in doubt of the validity of western civilization, they will start spouting their beliefs as if they are objectively true. Stephens Hicks calls these the Machiavellian Postmodernists. Then there are the Nihilistic Postmodernists. They know Marxism was wrong, communism is impossible, and socialism always fails, but capitalism should be destroyed anyway.
Agreed. I disagree with all these kids in college. Everyone doesn't belong in college regardless of who tells you so. If you didn't get a B+ to an A average in high school chances are don't belong going to college.
I am from India and did my college education in the US. Before leaving for America, I had a high opinion of the education system (many of the facets of the US higher education system is indeed wonderful and should be celebrated), but after getting there I realized I wanted to go to college in 90's America not then (2006-20111), it was still pretty chill and relaxed though. The first shoots of this craziness started probably in 2009, right after obama. I took a journalism class and the teacher randomly got us to take a are you gay quiz, ostensibly to empathize with those who are. One of the questions on the test was how do you know you are not gay, and it continued to build on this point. Trying to hammer you into submission saying that yes you are gay. When the teacher asked me to read my answer aloud due to me being a foreigner, thus might bring in a different perspective, I started with that specific question - How do I know I am not gay, I told them simply because no one taught me to be straight. I just realized sometime in my early teens that the girls I saw previously looked very different now and they had something which I wanted. Now it has gone to extreme levels, I can see.
I know, well I was a young and more malleable person back then. Why do you think they start in school. Going by what I read and see online, you guys have gone off the deep end. I still remember my college memories there, drinking beer on monday nights because it was no class tuesday, you could crack jokes in class. The professors were (mostly) chilled out, some ex-hippies, who would invite us over for bbq on the weekend with free beer and their wives would pack us massive lunchboxes of leftovers. Edgy beer pong sessions, you would actually want to invite a girl over to your room on the weekend instead of now where you will be in jail if you do so. Actually, non western countries are much more fun now, we have problems but we still have a soild main stream culture, something which you guys have almost lost.
Arjun, It started much earlier, but was 'hidden' from view because it wasnt accepted. However in 90's there was a collective move of people from the Al Gore Administration into the Primary School system. and they have worked since then to train the future adults and professors we have today. TBH its why things are the way they are in our society.
I once (long ago, before it was fashionable) used the word "problematic" in a sentence, without quotation marks. I have been saying Hail Marys ever since, but I feel the stain is permanent.
This has probably been said many times but, I appreciate something more when I earn it, rather than have it given to me. I worked my butt off to get my degree at 40, it was worth all the lost sleep, stress and trying to get through finals with the flu, than to have someone hold my hand along the way. There were so many times I wanted to quit, but I held on to the end. I also think some high school students aren't ready for college right out of high school, they need to get out into the world, experience failure and other travails of life first before heading into the shark-infested waters of college. Just saying.
" they need to get out into the world, experience failure and other travails of life first before heading into the shark-infested waters of college." I'm a fan of the concept of a "Voluntary Year of Social Service" and I don't talk about Social Justice Activism here. I'm talking about cleaning the asses of old people for one year. This will ground you forever.
I agree. I did my degree in my 30s whilst working full time with a family. At 18 I certainly wasn't ready for it. Equally, the fact I could do it while working full time. Makes me think that if students and lecturers actually did a *full* day and years work, they could have those degrees in 18 month to 2 years - after all I was doing it at night after work and in my lunchtimes and still did it in 4 years.
What just about all first tier universities like UW, UC Berkeley, Stanford, etc. select for now in their students who are not “Legacy” offspring or other sort of nepotistic relation of wealthy donors or alumni are High functioning autistic Study robots- except for the odd token lesbian or transsexual person of color- just to keep their Title XI stats looking good-
Especially for us with mood disorders. My college dorm room tirned into a prison cell with my introversion and irritability surrounding depression. No college music school was worth the torment.
"Valuing diversity, equity, and inclusion..." If I were reading though the propaganda documents, this is where I'd stop and scratch Evergreen off of my list.
Especially the way they snuck in "equity" where "equality" used to be. Because they don't want equality of opportunity, they want equity of outcome. They're not POC, they're POS.
yeah but if you have a kid who's a real loser, doesn't fit in, doesn't have friends (or at least not normal friends), you'll probably be super interested in a school like this...a school where the faculty and student body will be _forced_ to like your kid...a school where the odds of him returning home (and living in the basement indefinitely) are greatly reduced.
@@utubeismuhkrakaneliterally1807 the moment he figures out that he was pandered to and that nobody truly liked him, what do you think would be the outcome at that point?
By George (Bridges), I think you've almost got it! Just remember to at the same time make an equal place in your heart for "now that I am viewing the world exclusively through the lenses of race and sex, seeing any differences between racial groups or sexes - ANY difference - is also racist and sexist" and you'll be all set. Simple!
In short, it could well be. They are essentially trained to be neurotic and to obsess over smaller and smaller things, to they extent that they basically can't cope with anything of real value. When the world doesn't conform they rage.
Ughhh "equity".I genuinely get annoyed by the word. Whenever you hear it you know they are giving preferential treatment based on a immutable characteristic to some on the basis they think you can pre-judge people solely on those immutable characteristics. The idea you can look at someones skin color and say "well i can tell everything about you from your skin color and since you are X you are privileged or you are x therefore disadvantaged" is actually prejudice,wrapped up in a rainbow to be aesthetically pleasing. Its the same ethic Harvard is currently being sued for on account of being racist to Asians. I detest this need for educational institutions to indoctrinate.Their role is to educate and impart knowledge,not brain wash.
I keep watching these Evergreen videos in hopes that one day the story will be that evergreen has completely crashed and burned and is shutting down. I think that the brainwashing and Marxist teaching that Evergreen does is harmful for the students who attend, and the nation at large. The fact that they receive taxpayer money to do this makes it even more apparent. I'm sure there are some students that make it through ok, but the ones featured in the protest videos are a mess. It's as if you pay the university to make you LESS able to perform well in the workforce and less equipped to get a job. Their motto should be "Come to Evergreen. We will make you stupider"
"I just keep watching them because I like train crash videos. You just can't look away..." In this case, you dont't WANT to look away. I'm ordinarily for that people who do dumb shit learn from theri experiences to improve themselves as human biengs and preferably so without much abuse from their peers, but these people should be constantly hassled with reminders of their dumb shit for as long as they hold these toxic opinions and behaviors.
"Why the State of Washington isn’t pulling all funding from this Communist training camp is beyond me." Most communists over time have been more sensible than the "commies" of this day and age. Call them for what they are: True Degenerates.
My favorite professor at evergreen when I was there was my Russian Teacher, Elena Smith. Most real teacher I’ve ever met. She used to tell us how shitty communism was, and I swear I saw some students confused by what she was saying. Like “What? Isn’t communism the ideal society?”
The picture in the degree planning guide looks like some kind of religious revival. Can't be the actual students though, their faces resonate hatred and bitterness.
It is another American religious Revival. It call an "Great awakening". There was one in the XVIII Century and another in the XIX. This is the third one and the root is the same: non conformist calvinism. Whatch the patterns
Ironically, what I noticed about the first photo shown was all the white faces behind a light brown face. Not a single dark face. Don't get me wrong, I'm so white my face would probably glow in the dark.
Yeah, sure, I bet they'll really take their "inclusion and equity" doctrine seriously when black students start yammering on about white people. Their speech will be protected. So inclusive. So tolerant.
Teachers at public universities are public figures, their contact information during work hours is not private information. I lecture law. I expect no privacy. I _want_ to be held accountable if I am wrong. I get drowned in 'you're a nazi' claims because I think free speech trumps feelings. Hell, in the past I've had my home and cars shot up and one joint home invaded while I was overseas. I've been pulled off stage by the federal police here because someone allegedly came to shoot me (no idea if it was true - guns are banned in my country). Do I blame the journalists who published my home address? Yes. Would I care if they gave my work address? No.
This is not what parents want. Most parents have no idea what is going on in these schools. And if we're looking at patterns, this document is pretty run of the mill for universities these days.
A good majority of jobs these days, outside of specialized fields, don't even require a degree. The most important thing you can get from college is connections and the ability to discuss topics, including ones someone might disagree with. Giving into the "If you think differently, you don't belong" mentality defeats the purpose of such institutions.
That "not about creating an intellectual space, it's about creating a home" clip always kind of startles me. I have such a hard time getting my head into that place. It does remind me how universities have, for a long time, used lines in their marketing about being a home or home-like, and I wonder how much that's responsible for the mindset. Never thought people would take it that seriously as opposed to a fluffy way of expressing "We put a lot of money into the dorms and utilities."
When ever I hear the words inclusive, diversity, equable in relation to a college or university I immediately go a higher state of alert, waiting for the Merde frappe le fan yet again. I am glad that my nieces and nephew will not be going ESC
"You will be weighed, you will be measured, and you will be put in the box we want you put in. Thank you for flying the church of Intersectionality!"-Evergreen University.
Blurs out ok sigh. LOL. WP! When they were listing whether your aspirations are blah blah blah, they left out far left wing activist, Antifa, or BAMN member.
Perhaps the students shown on the manual's cover are looking up at President Bridges, who is standing on the roof of a 12 story building. The students are chanting "Jump, jump, jump, jump...."
Was struck by an observation that the younger generations are not having time alone to work out issues with each other, that they always rely on the helicopter parents to work things out. the longer we draw this period out in someone's life the more dangerous it gets
its our goal to take individuals, tell you to be individuals, then immediately jump to collectivisation and demand groups of people need extra bonuses based on arbitrary characteristics and dismiss the whole "individual" notion as now we have found a way to group you all
The problem with keeping the winners down is when do you stop hobbling the winners? When does a winner become not a winner but like everyone else? Do we keep beating on the former winners until they become losers? When do we end Affirmative Action for example? Or what happens when the losers become winners? Do we scale them back or keep propping them up at the expense of others? Men and women for example...according to a number of studies men have serious issues when you make comparisons between the genders...yet we still pound on men, especially white men. We are now at a place where you can point your finger at a man and he will lose his livelihood and reputation. Finally, who do we put in charge of deciding who gets beat on? Isn't this what revolutions and civil wars are made of?
In a larger sense the far left wants to shut down all the campuses in this country. So, all the people that are in cheerleader mode. Because of the idea of far left politics being defeated by capitalistic trends, that could certainly lead to the shut down Evergreen Collage. You are feeding in to the agenda of the far left. Their long term goal is to shut down every campus in this country. Why? You ask, would someone want to destroy the American education system? To make way for communism. For instance, every country in the world, that has ever been taken over by communism. The first thing that they do is to round up the educated people. In an effort to silence their voices. Why would communists have to worry about educated people? If their are no educated people. So watch what you ask for. Because, one day your children may not undr stan wy iz uh red flag whith a hamer n sikal on it, flyng ovr the wyt howz?
@5:14 "...you will have strong written and oral communication skills..." I actually made an involuntary snorting noise at that bit. Yeah, sure, George. I'm sure we all remember the writing from student activists featured on this channel over the past year.
Yikes! I know someone (cis white male with high gpa) who applled to TESC over a month ago & they haven't yet accepted him-he has since become aware of the state of things there & isn't keen on the drama. Speaking of drama-what a cliffhanger! How did it turn out between cat & chipmunk??
"When you leave Evergreen you will be prepared to be specially collaborative" ... chanting "Hey Hey Ho Ho" in the office when things get tough at work.
'Especially collaborative' = fully indoctrinated into a identity group philosophy, viewing yourself as part of a collective and thus in collaboration with all your fellow identity kamaraden. As for the argument about breadth of perspective.... *cue maniacal laughter* sure, except for having ANY familiarity at all with the viewpoints that might actually challenge your orthodoxy i.e. the only perspectives worth a damn to ensure your opinions are well founded in the first place.
The official tally for incoming freshman was supposed to be made 10 days into the first semester. That must have come and gone by now, right? What is it?
Cults always create new terms. Control the language with which their thoughts are constructed and you control the architecture of ideas that are created. Thetans are double-plus good!
Hi Benjamin. Great video... I appreciate your comment on my vid too! This really helped me understand the indoctrination in detail - the "Inclusion Policy" how absurd. This school is really insane
And I have to agree with you on the religiosity of the language in the D.I.E. framework. Very culty and manipulative for young people who are not steeled by life and experience.
"Especially collaborative" at Evergreen means you get to be part of a SJW Junta that on occasion performs coup d etats on university departments or administrations. BTW that "catastrophe" clip was hilarious :)
I'm glad I found someone who wants Evergreen to do better. I'm waiting to go there next year and when the riots happened and I noticed how crazy they all are, it really pissed me off. It kicked off my hatred of the SJW ideology while still identifying as left leaning independent.
You got some funny ass editing going on in this video! 7:03 Benjamin Boyce - Making cat videos _relevant_ on RUclips in 2018. Edit: Did that rodent eventually become a "gift" in front of your door? I had a cat that used to leave dead mice at my front door all of the time.
Paused at the 13:15 mark to shake my head at the word salad and have that action rearrange the meaning into something relateable......and what instantly came to mind was that these educators, and by extension the state are redefing what is and how community mindedness is expressed according to a deconstructionist world view. The cultural marxists have successfully dismantled the traditional meaning of The Family and by undermining and diminishing the significance of a married mother and father complementing each other and committed to raising their offspring are now usurping the role. Before all this, communities (for the most part) evolved around the church which was the glue that allowed its members and supporters to express their humanity and humanitarian goodwill to the needy with focus primarily on the immediate community (in theory). The ideal was Jesus and those most earnest/devout and well meaning strived both individually and collectively) to make the mark (with the belief that goodness and change would evolve through the ripple effect -- fundamentalist extremists aside) but now that this peculiar western cultural norm has been ridiculed, maligned and legislated to the fringe, the statists/communitarians are busy filling the void with creatures of their own design adulating new heroes (eg Marx and popstars) and spreading a replacement doctrine which appears to be the antithesis of the Gospel. I swear I feel like punching the next teacher in my direct hearing who parrots the mantra that "It takes a village to raise a child" . Another lefty euphemism ... Village = The State. The line ... "teachers leave them kids alone"... takes on a totally new meaning in the post modern world.
Myself, wife, and a couple friends attended the Portland State discussion about the James Demore memo last winter. Bret made a cameo appearance, with the panel made up Heather Heying, Helen Pluckrose, Peter Boghossian, and of course James Damore. As we were standing in line, we got into a conversation with a woman that graduated from Evergreen. Her favorite teach was Heather. She was both dismayed and saddened by the loss of two great minds from Evergreen. I can confirm, after listening to the debate, Heather is a very interesting person to listen to. I hope Evergreen can figure things out for the sake of those that are attending and the graduated. I think a good start would be to fire the president.
I prefer looking at the methodology rather than the intent as indicators of outcomes. The handbook promises multiple (diverse) methodologies (courses) that lead to the same (equitable) good grades (excellence) requiring only selection (planning) by any (inclusive) inept (disadvantaged) student with faculty (team). The handbook advises the student who can't meet the course requirements, to switch courses to something suggested by the faculty they can get good grades in. That seems like a bait and switch, bait them with the promise of good grades in disciplines of their choice, then tell them to switch subjects to get those grades. It would be interesting to know how many students switch subjects and to what subjects and if those subjects have standardized grading or lead anywhere.
There was a piece on CBC radio today discussing grade escalation ( normalizing) in high school and concomitant de-escalation (correction) in 1st and 2nd yr university, also rustication, in Ontario, and Canada in general- OISE is to thank.
My daughter is moving here from Tennessee in January. She mentioned this college and we quickly caught her up on this college. Had to go over it twice because she was shocked at what was going on. Needless to say she will not be going there.
I am hesitant to believe someone from your fan-base was harassing someone. I suppose it is possible, but I consider it very unlikely. Maybe I overestimate my peers.
Nah, man. I recognize some screennames/ avatars from other skeptic/antiSJW/call-to-reason channels and some people are just tribalistic, toxic and appear to just want to stir shit in the comments section without any regard to the message of the actual video they're commenting on. This is the internet after all, crazy asshes have as much a voice as you and me and are probably more likely to use it.
Good call on the "share a mosaïc" rather than "contribute" or sth. Note also the use of "backgrounds and perspectives" rather than e.g. "origins and worldviews". The idea of "background and perspective" is that you have a different *literal* point of view, i.e. you see things from a certain vantage point, which may be, for example, privileged or oppressed, and this supports the idea that you can't understand other points of view. However, "origin and worldview" would mean that you have indeed a place you *started*, but from which you have the possibility to emancipate, and a worldview is something you create yourself, whereas a perspective is just something that happens to result from where you're positioned. Come to think about it, the whole intersectionality thing seems but a long and sophisticated metaphor about perspective. Which, interestingly enough, is also one of the big explanatory principles of flat-earthers. Just sayin'.
my my how Washington has changed. grew up 30 miles from Evergreen. practically every boy had a gun in the truck gun rack, and we all carried pocketknives 24/7. most of the boys and half the girls could have survived had you dropped them off in the woods. kids have become soft. had this gone down while I was in high school we would have been there terrorizing them on a daily basis. I don't think we could have helped ourselves.
The Pareto distribution rules all, equality of outcomes is impossible due to inequality of the relevant people. Statistically Speaking, there are 1 in 200-1000 people who could do what I am capable of as easily as I do it. Equality of outcomes is the moronic and wishful thinking of lesser people.
Specially collaborative education. That must be the new and improved, upgraded special ed. I always wanted to collabor with other specialists. Makes me feel inclusive.
Technically they are in favor of equality of opportunity, not equality of outcome. They just assume all (group) differences in outcome are the result of inequality in opportunity.
love the way they see themselves as a successful institution, I do wonder how they are judging their success? Maybe it's judged by how good they "feel" about themselves? It's probably not judged on their academic reputation, the demand for admission spots, their financial success or the success of their fundraising efforts. It would be interesting to find out what criteria, if any they use or whether it's just seen as a marketing ploy which sounds better than trying to be successful.
The thing about equity (equality of outcome) is really simple: It will not bring everyone _up_ to the same level, but it will necessarily drag everyone _down_ to the level of the least capable. Not everyone can attain the same outcome at everything. Think back to when you were at school. Think of the people who were in the bottom sets for everything, the ones who left school barely able to read or write. Your outcome will be the same as theirs. They can't be heart surgeons, or physicists, or electrical engineers, so neither can you.
I would advise you to read Carl Jung's typology descriptions. Yes the MBTI was based on it but reading Jung's original is very interesting. He described the character traits of Extroverted feeling. And that extroverted feeling types try to create group harmony, and have other traits like vanity, conformity etc. he also believed most extroverted feeling types were women. I think there are many causes for the Evergreen disaster. BUT you might add this to the list. Extroverted feeling types often find positions in administration. They are talented at public persona. But the inferior function of an extroverted feeling type would be introverted thinking. Which would be the rational thinking introspective type. Or the introverted feeling types which would usually be rational qualitative function of a talented artist or writer. I think administrations expand and become more expensive because extroverted feeling types in administrative jobs hire more unnecessary extroverted feeling types. Then they are in charge of hiring teachers as well. They are not going to hire teachers of great intelligence or skills they will hire teachers who conform to their sense of group belonging. This does not mean the extroverted feeling type is all bad. The trait probably evolved to create dominant mothers who could harmonize small groups meaning children.
Last note, if you're really interested in what they mean by "cultural competency" you should check out a book by Zaretta Hammond called "culturally responsive teaching and the brain", it explains everything.
It would be great if you could get Haidt or Lukianoff on the show indeed! Haidt would likely attract more viewers, however I would prefer Lukianoff, since Haidt is everywhere on the internet anyway. ; )
Why would equity necessarily need to weigh down people at the top? Isn't it giving more tutoring to people who need , and less to those who need less, rather than an equal amount irrespective of need?
maybe i should wear a shirt with "It's Okay To Be White" spelled out in AMSLAN (american Sign language hands) tht should be "Diverse" wnough for them, riiiight?
How do 'intellectuals' fool themselves into thinking an ideology with no real means of measurement from person to person, acting on assumptions of who is and isn't disadvantaged and assumptions of what causes it, with no hard system of categorising who gets what, why they deserve it over another, and what 'disadvantage' trumps another...it's tiring even putting it into words, it goes on forever in a circular logic without any solid foundation, it's mindboggling how they can be touted as the torch bearers of reason and believe one of the most unreasonable outlooks on life, especially equality/equity of outcome, an inherently discriminatory and abhorrent in practice goal to have, heirarchy is inherent, all animals have it and it's unavoidable, the very moment two people do a task and one is better at it, poof, hierarchy, we will never be equal, there's a million ways we can each be better than eachother at various things in life, they're acting on the assumption any and all discrepancy is based on race and gender discrimination first and foremost, then income of family, sexuality and nationality.
Remember "i think therefore i am", well for intersectionalists it's "i'm not white male therefore i suffer" they can be middle class or wealthy, beautiful and treated well by all they encounter and still believe this.
Comon IISocratesll!...You have to know that the best college produced resume is awarded by the college to the uneducated, illiterate, leftist so-called student whose parents pay the most for their child's stay.
I spent 16 months working on a database project that required race info for funding. It was insanely complex because there are so many multi-racial humans. Every day was a struggle with bureaucrats who really believe "Hispanic" is a race.
The answer to your question.., paraphrased, how do intellectualls justify this nonsense?
Simple answer
Post Modernism, a derivative of Neo Marxism, specifically the Frankfurt School.
They don't believe in facts and transplanted Marxist theory (economic) directly to Culture.
Since Marxism profoundly failed, you'd think they would be careful, but No.
Marxism, was supposed to be a modernist, scientific, materialistic explanation of the world.
When the soviet union inevitably failed, and surmounting evidence was clearly brought before the intellectuals that Marxism was wrong, they had a crisis of faith. They had to choose to accept reason, logic and empirical evidence, and reject Marxism (Like Hayek), or to reject reason, logic and empirical evidence. The ones who rejected reason, is what Stephen Hicks calls the "Kierkegaardian" Postmodernists. Kierkegaard and Kant took similar approaches with Christianity when, chrisitianity's natural explanations of the world were proved to be the opposite (IE. Heliocentrism). Kant said "I had to reject reason, to make room for faith". Kierkegaard said "Faith requires the crucifixion of reason". So these postmodernists took this leap of faith. There were others, who believed it was culture that made socialism fail, they believe that Marxism is still scientific, and are yet comfortable enough with the contradicting evidence. These ones outwardly use relativism to disarm you, and when you are in doubt of the validity of western civilization, they will start spouting their beliefs as if they are objectively true. Stephens Hicks calls these the Machiavellian Postmodernists. Then there are the Nihilistic Postmodernists. They know Marxism was wrong, communism is impossible, and socialism always fails, but capitalism should be destroyed anyway.
Agreed. I disagree with all these kids in college. Everyone doesn't belong in college regardless of who tells you so. If you didn't get a B+ to an A average in high school chances are don't belong going to college.
There is already a word for “inclusive excellence” in the English language. It’s called “mediocrity”. Excellence is exclusive by definition.
Well said, gentlemen!
I am from India and did my college education in the US. Before leaving for America, I had a high opinion of the education system (many of the facets of the US higher education system is indeed wonderful and should be celebrated), but after getting there I realized I wanted to go to college in 90's America not then (2006-20111), it was still pretty chill and relaxed though. The first shoots of this craziness started probably in 2009, right after obama. I took a journalism class and the teacher randomly got us to take a are you gay quiz, ostensibly to empathize with those who are. One of the questions on the test was how do you know you are not gay, and it continued to build on this point. Trying to hammer you into submission saying that yes you are gay. When the teacher asked me to read my answer aloud due to me being a foreigner, thus might bring in a different perspective, I started with that specific question - How do I know I am not gay, I told them simply because no one taught me to be straight. I just realized sometime in my early teens that the girls I saw previously looked very different now and they had something which I wanted. Now it has gone to extreme levels, I can see.
WEIRD!! I wish you had instead told that teacher that it's non of his or her business!
I know, well I was a young and more malleable person back then. Why do you think they start in school. Going by what I read and see online, you guys have gone off the deep end. I still remember my college memories there, drinking beer on monday nights because it was no class tuesday, you could crack jokes in class. The professors were (mostly) chilled out, some ex-hippies, who would invite us over for bbq on the weekend with free beer and their wives would pack us massive lunchboxes of leftovers. Edgy beer pong sessions, you would actually want to invite a girl over to your room on the weekend instead of now where you will be in jail if you do so. Actually, non western countries are much more fun now, we have problems but we still have a soild main stream culture, something which you guys have almost lost.
Arjun, It started much earlier, but was 'hidden' from view because it wasnt accepted. However in 90's there was a collective move of people from the Al Gore Administration into the Primary School system. and they have worked since then to train the future adults and professors we have today. TBH its why things are the way they are in our society.
FYI. I have lived and worked, gone to college and raised a family without ever hearing the word "intersectionality".
While I understand and applaud the sentiment, your statement is a bit paradoxical, in a Gödelian kinda way.
I once (long ago, before it was fashionable) used the word "problematic" in a sentence, without quotation marks. I have been saying Hail Marys ever since, but I feel the stain is permanent.
M Snyder
Intersectionophobicist!
yea. Ok. 😂😂😂
Sandra Ward You must be a Nazi.
This has probably been said many times but, I appreciate something more when I earn it, rather than have it given to me. I worked my butt off to get my degree at 40, it was worth all the lost sleep, stress and trying to get through finals with the flu, than to have someone hold my hand along the way. There were so many times I wanted to quit, but I held on to the end. I also think some high school students aren't ready for college right out of high school, they need to get out into the world, experience failure and other travails of life first before heading into the shark-infested waters of college. Just saying.
Well said 👍🏽
" they need to get out into the world, experience failure and other travails of life first before heading into the shark-infested waters of college."
I'm a fan of the concept of a "Voluntary Year of Social Service" and I don't talk about Social Justice Activism here. I'm talking about cleaning the asses of old people for one year. This will ground you forever.
I agree. I did my degree in my 30s whilst working full time with a family. At 18 I certainly wasn't ready for it. Equally, the fact I could do it while working full time. Makes me think that if students and lecturers actually did a *full* day and years work, they could have those degrees in 18 month to 2 years - after all I was doing it at night after work and in my lunchtimes and still did it in 4 years.
What just about all first tier universities like UW, UC Berkeley, Stanford, etc. select for now in their students who are not “Legacy” offspring or other sort of nepotistic relation of wealthy donors or alumni are High functioning autistic Study robots- except for the odd token lesbian or transsexual person of color- just to keep their Title XI stats looking good-
Especially for us with mood disorders. My college dorm room tirned into a prison cell with my introversion and irritability surrounding depression. No college music school was worth the torment.
"Valuing diversity, equity, and inclusion..."
If I were reading though the propaganda documents, this is where I'd stop and scratch Evergreen off of my list.
Especially the way they snuck in "equity" where "equality" used to be.
Because they don't want equality of opportunity, they want equity of outcome.
They're not POC, they're POS.
YESSSS.
yeah but if you have a kid who's a real loser, doesn't fit in, doesn't have friends (or at least not normal friends), you'll probably be super interested in a school like this...a school where the faculty and student body will be _forced_ to like your kid...a school where the odds of him returning home (and living in the basement indefinitely) are greatly reduced.
Not necessarily.
@@utubeismuhkrakaneliterally1807 the moment he figures out that he was pandered to and that nobody truly liked him, what do you think would be the outcome at that point?
Not seeing race is the new racism. Not seeing sex is the new sexism. Not having bias is the new biased.
By George (Bridges), I think you've almost got it! Just remember to at the same time make an equal place in your heart for "now that I am viewing the world exclusively through the lenses of race and sex, seeing any differences between racial groups or sexes - ANY difference - is also racist and sexist" and you'll be all set. Simple!
Sounds like a Maoist retraining camp to me.
strontiumXnitrate
Will there be Snacks? :-)
LOL!!!
Marxist Indoctrination Camps !
"Fetishize the Marginalised" what an accurate way to put it.
Using them to fill one's own needy emotional holes.
Is this where all the anger comes from? The constant focusing on differences, followed by the inevitable failure to achieve this “equity” ?
In short, it could well be. They are essentially trained to be neurotic and to obsess over smaller and smaller things, to they extent that they basically can't cope with anything of real value. When the world doesn't conform they rage.
Ughhh "equity".I genuinely get annoyed by the word.
Whenever you hear it you know they are giving preferential treatment based on a immutable characteristic to some on the basis they think you can pre-judge people solely on those immutable characteristics.
The idea you can look at someones skin color and say "well i can tell everything about you from your skin color and since you are X you are privileged or you are x therefore disadvantaged" is actually prejudice,wrapped up in a rainbow to be aesthetically pleasing.
Its the same ethic Harvard is currently being sued for on account of being racist to Asians.
I detest this need for educational institutions to indoctrinate.Their role is to educate and impart knowledge,not brain wash.
I keep watching these Evergreen videos in hopes that one day the story will be that evergreen has completely crashed and burned and is shutting down. I think that the brainwashing and Marxist teaching that Evergreen does is harmful for the students who attend, and the nation at large. The fact that they receive taxpayer money to do this makes it even more apparent. I'm sure there are some students that make it through ok, but the ones featured in the protest videos are a mess. It's as if you pay the university to make you LESS able to perform well in the workforce and less equipped to get a job. Their motto should be "Come to Evergreen. We will make you stupider"
I just keep watching them because I like train crash videos. You just can't look away... and Benjamin is such a good commentator!
Trouble is at least rhey are all in one place. Once it crashes these people will be spreading their poison across more campuses.
David R I hope I never have to work with or for one of those students see in the videos, they’ll be smug, victim-seeking nightmares
"I just keep watching them because I like train crash videos. You just can't look away..."
In this case, you dont't WANT to look away. I'm ordinarily for that people who do dumb shit learn from theri experiences to improve themselves as human biengs and preferably so without much abuse from their peers, but these people should be constantly hassled with reminders of their dumb shit for as long as they hold these toxic opinions and behaviors.
"Why the State of Washington isn’t pulling all funding from this Communist training camp is beyond me."
Most communists over time have been more sensible than the "commies" of this day and age. Call them for what they are: True Degenerates.
My favorite professor at evergreen when I was there was my Russian Teacher, Elena Smith. Most real teacher I’ve ever met. She used to tell us how shitty communism was, and I swear I saw some students confused by what she was saying. Like “What? Isn’t communism the ideal society?”
Notice the words "gainful employment' aren't mentioned. LOL
Please let us subscribers know if you'll ever be in Los Angeles. "Inclusive excellence" is just too funny.
The picture in the degree planning guide looks like some kind of religious revival. Can't be the actual students though, their faces resonate hatred and bitterness.
It is another American religious Revival. It call an "Great awakening". There was one in the XVIII Century and another in the XIX. This is the third one and the root is the same: non conformist calvinism. Whatch the patterns
Ironically, what I noticed about the first photo shown was all the white faces behind a light brown face. Not a single dark face. Don't get me wrong, I'm so white my face would probably glow in the dark.
So they are going to take a diverse group of people and make them the same. Got it. 👌. Dolor.
Yeah, sure, I bet they'll really take their "inclusion and equity" doctrine seriously when black students start yammering on about white people. Their speech will be protected. So inclusive. So tolerant.
Since the seventies, all words like “inclusiveness”, “diversity”, “equal opportunity” mean “white males need not apply”.
If you're a white male, how can I even trust what you say?
don't assume his gender! LOL
Teachers at public universities are public figures, their contact information during work hours is not private information. I lecture law. I expect no privacy. I _want_ to be held accountable if I am wrong. I get drowned in 'you're a nazi' claims because I think free speech trumps feelings. Hell, in the past I've had my home and cars shot up and one joint home invaded while I was overseas. I've been pulled off stage by the federal police here because someone allegedly came to shoot me (no idea if it was true - guns are banned in my country). Do I blame the journalists who published my home address? Yes. Would I care if they gave my work address? No.
Quite the eventful life you lead.
"Students who complete a liberal eduction are well prepared to make an impact on society."
"Do you want extra cream with your frappuccino?"
They'll be lucky to even be qualified to work at Starbucks.
This is not what parents want. Most parents have no idea what is going on in these schools. And if we're looking at patterns, this document is pretty run of the mill for universities these days.
@Mike Schnobrich Their parents are the ones paying for this and Ben mentioned parents wants so I was responding to his comment.
Puff Ball's comment reminds me in some twisted way of the Groove Tube Clown Scene from Chicken Fried Movie. The Koko Show.
How is public money allowed to run a place like this?
Hi Benjamin. Thanks all that you do.
Thank you HipsterBanana. May you ripen smoothly, and without gishing bruises.
A good majority of jobs these days, outside of specialized fields, don't even require a degree. The most important thing you can get from college is connections and the ability to discuss topics, including ones someone might disagree with. Giving into the "If you think differently, you don't belong" mentality defeats the purpose of such institutions.
They should teach a class called “Implementing Double-Speak”
It's probably called post colonial english....
Say, did they ever find those 'racist teachers'? And if so, did they got to go?
That "not about creating an intellectual space, it's about creating a home" clip always kind of startles me. I have such a hard time getting my head into that place.
It does remind me how universities have, for a long time, used lines in their marketing about being a home or home-like, and I wonder how much that's responsible for the mindset. Never thought people would take it that seriously as opposed to a fluffy way of expressing "We put a lot of money into the dorms and utilities."
When ever I hear the words inclusive, diversity, equable in relation to a college or university I immediately go a higher state of alert, waiting for the Merde frappe le fan yet again.
I am glad that my nieces and nephew will not be going ESC
..."the intention does not matter. The effect matters." Chilling.
"You will be weighed, you will be measured, and you will be put in the box we want you put in. Thank you for flying the church of Intersectionality!"-Evergreen University.
Blurs out ok sigh. LOL. WP! When they were listing whether your aspirations are blah blah blah, they left out far left wing activist, Antifa, or BAMN member.
Perhaps the students shown on the manual's cover are looking up at President Bridges, who is standing on the roof of a 12 story building. The students are chanting "Jump, jump, jump, jump...."
Was struck by an observation that the younger generations are not having time alone to work out issues with each other, that they always rely on the helicopter parents to work things out. the longer we draw this period out in someone's life the more dangerous it gets
its our goal to take individuals, tell you to be individuals, then immediately jump to collectivisation and demand groups of people need extra bonuses based on arbitrary characteristics and dismiss the whole "individual" notion as now we have found a way to group you all
The problem with keeping the winners down is when do you stop hobbling the winners? When does a winner become not a winner but like everyone else? Do we keep beating on the former winners until they become losers? When do we end Affirmative Action for example? Or what happens when the losers become winners? Do we scale them back or keep propping them up at the expense of others? Men and women for example...according to a number of studies men have serious issues when you make comparisons between the genders...yet we still pound on men, especially white men. We are now at a place where you can point your finger at a man and he will lose his livelihood and reputation. Finally, who do we put in charge of deciding who gets beat on? Isn't this what revolutions and civil wars are made of?
how the hell does this "school" get governmental funding?
In a larger sense the far left wants to shut down all the campuses in this country. So, all the people that are in cheerleader mode. Because of the idea of far left politics being defeated by capitalistic trends, that could certainly lead to the shut down Evergreen Collage. You are feeding in to the agenda of the far left. Their long term goal is to shut down every campus in this country.
Why? You ask, would someone want to destroy the American education system? To make way for communism. For instance, every country in the world, that has ever been taken over by communism. The first thing that they do is to round up the educated people. In an effort to silence their voices.
Why would communists have to worry about educated people? If their are no educated people. So watch what you ask for. Because, one day your children may not undr stan wy iz uh red flag whith a hamer n sikal on it, flyng ovr the wyt howz?
I don’t get what happened. In the 60s & 70s we were moving towards true racial equality. Where did it go wrong?
We are Borg. Your cultural and technological distinctiveness will be adapted to service us.
👏hey👏hey👏ho👏ho👏assimilate👏or👏G👏T👏F👏O👏
First time seeing your content. Instant mad respect for you for calling yourself out for a mistake you made. Good on you, bro. 👏👏
@5:14 "...you will have strong written and oral communication skills..." I actually made an involuntary snorting noise at that bit. Yeah, sure, George. I'm sure we all remember the writing from student activists featured on this channel over the past year.
Yikes! I know someone (cis white male with high gpa) who applled to TESC over a month ago & they haven't yet accepted him-he has since become aware of the state of things there & isn't keen on the drama. Speaking of drama-what a cliffhanger! How did it turn out between cat & chipmunk??
I was wondering that too. We were left on a cliff-hanger.
Enquiring minds want to know.
Especially callaboritive means you have no problem existing within the hive mind heirarchy.
Hey hey, ho ho! Trebuchet this school into the sun!
Has a kind of poetry to it...
That's not possible. You didn't take physics, did you?
@@robertmatthews2009 Then lets bring the sun to the school. I won't miss the planet.
I loved how you blotted out the OK hand gesture. LMFAO
"When you leave Evergreen you will be prepared to be specially collaborative" ... chanting "Hey Hey Ho Ho" in the office when things get tough at work.
As long as different races have different average IQs, equity of outcome will be impossible.
I think about that cesspool every time I go by on my way to Shelton.
I watched a whole ad for you...
“All Animals are equal, but some Animals are more equal than others.” - Animal Farm by George Orwell
'Especially collaborative' = fully indoctrinated into a identity group philosophy, viewing yourself as part of a collective and thus in collaboration with all your fellow identity kamaraden.
As for the argument about breadth of perspective.... *cue maniacal laughter* sure, except for having ANY familiarity at all with the viewpoints that might actually challenge your orthodoxy i.e. the only perspectives worth a damn to ensure your opinions are well founded in the first place.
The official tally for incoming freshman was supposed to be made 10 days into the first semester. That must have come and gone by now, right? What is it?
Cults always create new terms. Control the language with which their thoughts are constructed and you control the architecture of ideas that are created. Thetans are double-plus good!
The future is not up, it's forward. Up is is the supernatural.
Not if you’re a string bean though.
Hi Benjamin. Great video...
I appreciate your comment on my vid too! This really helped me understand the indoctrination in detail - the "Inclusion Policy" how absurd. This school is really insane
Always on point! Thanks.
You’re welcome YB, I hope we can chat some time.
Benjamin A Boyce - You bet! Perhaps online, perhaps someday if I can drag my sorry self south to one of your meet n greet gatherings.
Just how Yukon are you?
Benjamin A Boyce , not that far north anymore, but still in western Canada....which covers a huge amount of real estate.....
And I have to agree with you on the religiosity of the language in the D.I.E. framework. Very culty and manipulative for young people who are not steeled by life and experience.
"Especially collaborative" at Evergreen means you get to be part of a SJW Junta that on occasion performs coup d etats on university departments or administrations. BTW that "catastrophe" clip was hilarious :)
I'm glad I found someone who wants Evergreen to do better. I'm waiting to go there next year and when the riots happened and I noticed how crazy they all are, it really pissed me off. It kicked off my hatred of the SJW ideology while still identifying as left leaning independent.
When you graduate from Evergreen you'll be a flippin Muppet.. We'll give you a diverse choice: Kermit, Ms Piggy or even Fozzy Bear.. Yaaay!
Evergreen has a new "Disorientation Manual"? Why am I so surprised?
You got some funny ass editing going on in this video!
7:03 Benjamin Boyce - Making cat videos _relevant_ on RUclips in 2018.
Edit: Did that rodent eventually become a "gift" in front of your door? I had a cat that used to leave dead mice at my front door all of the time.
Paused at the 13:15 mark to shake my head at the word salad and have that action rearrange the meaning into something relateable......and what instantly came to mind was that these educators, and by extension the state are redefing what is and how community mindedness is expressed according to a deconstructionist world view. The cultural marxists have successfully dismantled the traditional meaning of The Family and by undermining and diminishing the significance of a married mother and father complementing each other and committed to raising their offspring are now usurping the role. Before all this, communities (for the most part) evolved around the church which was the glue that allowed its members and supporters to express their humanity and humanitarian goodwill to the needy with focus primarily on the immediate community (in theory). The ideal was Jesus and those most earnest/devout and well meaning strived both individually and collectively) to make the mark (with the belief that goodness and change would evolve through the ripple effect -- fundamentalist extremists aside) but now that this peculiar western cultural norm has been ridiculed, maligned and legislated to the fringe, the statists/communitarians are busy filling the void with creatures of their own design adulating new heroes (eg Marx and popstars) and spreading a replacement doctrine which appears to be the antithesis of the Gospel.
I swear I feel like punching the next teacher in my direct hearing who parrots the mantra that "It takes a village to raise a child" . Another lefty euphemism ... Village = The State.
The line ... "teachers leave them kids alone"... takes on a totally new meaning in the post modern world.
Especially Collaborative: Prone to group think, and critical of any opinions which stand outside of canonical liberal orthodoxy.
Myself, wife, and a couple friends attended the Portland State discussion about the James Demore memo last winter. Bret made a cameo appearance, with the panel made up Heather Heying, Helen Pluckrose, Peter Boghossian, and of course James Damore.
As we were standing in line, we got into a conversation with a woman that graduated from Evergreen. Her favorite teach was Heather. She was both dismayed and saddened by the loss of two great minds from Evergreen. I can confirm, after listening to the debate, Heather is a very interesting person to listen to. I hope Evergreen can figure things out for the sake of those that are attending and the graduated. I think a good start would be to fire the president.
I prefer looking at the methodology rather than the intent as indicators of outcomes. The handbook promises multiple (diverse) methodologies (courses) that lead to the same (equitable) good grades (excellence) requiring only selection (planning) by any (inclusive) inept (disadvantaged) student with faculty (team).
The handbook advises the student who can't meet the course requirements, to switch courses to something suggested by the faculty they can get good grades in.
That seems like a bait and switch, bait them with the promise of good grades in disciplines of their choice, then tell them to switch subjects to get those grades. It would be interesting to know how many students switch subjects and to what subjects and if those subjects have standardized grading or lead anywhere.
There was a piece on CBC radio today discussing grade escalation ( normalizing) in high school and concomitant de-escalation (correction) in 1st and 2nd yr university, also rustication, in Ontario, and Canada in general- OISE is to thank.
Kudos to you for the up-front admission.
My daughter is moving here from Tennessee in January. She mentioned this college and we quickly caught her up on this college. Had to go over it twice because she was shocked at what was going on. Needless to say she will not be going there.
I am hesitant to believe someone from your fan-base was harassing someone. I suppose it is possible, but I consider it very unlikely. Maybe I overestimate my peers.
Nah, man. I recognize some screennames/ avatars from other skeptic/antiSJW/call-to-reason channels and some people are just tribalistic, toxic and appear to just want to stir shit in the comments section without any regard to the message of the actual video they're commenting on. This is the internet after all, crazy asshes have as much a voice as you and me and are probably more likely to use it.
It's a little disconcerting having your children raised by radicals.
5:34 "...prepare you to achieve your future goals."
Sounds like a lyric out of the Will Powers' "Adventures in Success", goodness.
Good call on the "share a mosaïc" rather than "contribute" or sth.
Note also the use of "backgrounds and perspectives" rather than e.g. "origins and worldviews". The idea of "background and perspective" is that you have a different *literal* point of view, i.e. you see things from a certain vantage point, which may be, for example, privileged or oppressed, and this supports the idea that you can't understand other points of view.
However, "origin and worldview" would mean that you have indeed a place you *started*, but from which you have the possibility to emancipate, and a worldview is something you create yourself, whereas a perspective is just something that happens to result from where you're positioned.
Come to think about it, the whole intersectionality thing seems but a long and sophisticated metaphor about perspective. Which, interestingly enough, is also one of the big explanatory principles of flat-earthers. Just sayin'.
11:11 It was at this moment that I realized "wider" and "whiter" sound very similar, and can lead to some hilarious results.
... und so whiter, as the Germans say.
*Anytime anyone mentiones Equty: RUN!!!*
It becomes all humans are equal. But some are more equal.
Bridges has to go. To call him an embarrassment is an insult to merely awkward people who are accidentally and innocently embarrassing.
my my how Washington has changed. grew up 30 miles from Evergreen. practically every boy had a gun in the truck gun rack, and we all carried pocketknives 24/7. most of the boys and half the girls could have survived had you dropped them off in the woods. kids have become soft. had this gone down while I was in high school we would have been there terrorizing them on a daily basis. I don't think we could have helped ourselves.
... Cram 'em all into The Blender, lock on the top, and hit the *LIQUIFY* button.
The Pareto distribution rules all, equality of outcomes is impossible due to inequality of the relevant people. Statistically Speaking, there are 1 in 200-1000 people who could do what I am capable of as easily as I do it. Equality of outcomes is the moronic and wishful thinking of lesser people.
did you get those guys who wrote the book on your channel? I'll look but since you have so many videos, i might not find it, thanks!
Specially collaborative education. That must be the new and improved, upgraded special ed. I always wanted to collabor with other specialists. Makes me feel inclusive.
I forecast insolvency in Evergreen's future.
Especially collaborative = works well in group therapy
Technically they are in favor of equality of opportunity, not equality of outcome. They just assume all (group) differences in outcome are the result of inequality in opportunity.
love the way they see themselves as a successful institution, I do wonder how they are judging their success? Maybe it's judged by how good they "feel" about themselves? It's probably not judged on their academic reputation, the demand for admission spots, their financial success or the success of their fundraising efforts. It would be interesting to find out what criteria, if any they use or whether it's just seen as a marketing ploy which sounds better than trying to be successful.
I hope Mt St Helena oozes a big lava flow across Evergreen college
If there's a God, you're doing God's work, Benjamin-hell, even if there isn't, you're still doing it.
The thing about equity (equality of outcome) is really simple: It will not bring everyone _up_ to the same level, but it will necessarily drag everyone _down_ to the level of the least capable. Not everyone can attain the same outcome at everything. Think back to when you were at school. Think of the people who were in the bottom sets for everything, the ones who left school barely able to read or write. Your outcome will be the same as theirs. They can't be heart surgeons, or physicists, or electrical engineers, so neither can you.
Lol, that chipmunk is fucked. Though, where was the inspirational music for that slo-mo escape scene XD
I would advise you to read Carl Jung's typology descriptions. Yes the MBTI was based on it but reading Jung's original is very interesting.
He described the character traits of Extroverted feeling. And that extroverted feeling types try to create group harmony, and have other traits like vanity, conformity etc. he also believed most extroverted feeling types were women.
I think there are many causes for the Evergreen disaster. BUT you might add this to the list.
Extroverted feeling types often find positions in administration. They are talented at public persona.
But the inferior function of an extroverted feeling type would be introverted thinking. Which would be the rational thinking introspective type. Or the introverted feeling types which would usually be rational qualitative function of a talented artist or writer.
I think administrations expand and become more expensive because extroverted feeling types in administrative jobs hire more unnecessary extroverted feeling types. Then they are in charge of hiring teachers as well.
They are not going to hire teachers of great intelligence or skills they will hire teachers who conform to their sense of group belonging.
This does not mean the extroverted feeling type is all bad. The trait probably evolved to create dominant mothers who could harmonize small groups meaning children.
Inclusive Excellence: Excluding good students to include inclusion since 2018...it's going to work this time, guys!
Last note, if you're really interested in what they mean by "cultural competency" you should check out a book by Zaretta Hammond called "culturally responsive teaching and the brain", it explains everything.
Why did I get a notification for this I am not even subscribed????? WTF
'whom' do you think is being 'strung up' to the right of the handbook cover photo ?
It would be great if you could get Haidt or Lukianoff on the show indeed! Haidt would likely attract more viewers, however I would prefer Lukianoff, since Haidt is everywhere on the internet anyway. ; )
Why would equity necessarily need to weigh down people at the top? Isn't it giving more tutoring to people who need , and less to those who need less, rather than an equal amount irrespective of need?
Wow, that sounded like the movie The Sleeper.
maybe i should wear a shirt with "It's Okay To Be White" spelled out in AMSLAN (american Sign language hands) tht should be "Diverse" wnough for them, riiiight?
Pixillated his hand making the OK gesture? What? (at 5:57 for those that missed it.
Lol 😂 pixelated ok sign at about six minutes in. Hahahahahaaa
Cultural competency skills huh????? My mind just locked up... what's the square root of negative 1?
Aw, the kitty brought you a new pet.