A natural athlete whose movement around the court was so balletic. Miss him dreadfully and he will always be my GOAT!
9 месяцев назад+9
I still can't believe I was sitting in the crowd that day. This level of play, the match ending a few minutes before sunset interruption... everything was magical.
A lot of Federer fans live in regret. But I refuse to. Despite him losing a few very close matches, he also won many matches as well. He has 20 slams and over 100 career titles. I choose to be happy with what he achieved than be sad with what he lost.
@@MobbieKeyswell, Novak started winning more and more only when the oppositions were weak from 2011 onwards, no more prime Federer, no more prime Nadal. Murray peak was only good for 1 year. Who else gonna challenge Novak? The generation that came after the big 3 are very weak mentally!
I like to watch Jokovic vs Nadal. I admit this brings me imense pleasure. But, I like every match of Roger, doesn't matter the opponent. It is masterpiece every time. Roger is the peak of tennis, and the clash Jokovic vs Nadal, as well.
The Raquet Was His Paint Brush and The Court Was His Canvas...That FO Match Against Djokovic on a 40+ Match Win Streak Was IMMENSE Natural Talent on Full Display by Roger...The Shots Fed Was Making All Match Long Was JAW DROPPING!
As a fan, I find no reason to regret about Roger’s career. Just look at this masterpiece here. These are highlights from just one match and Federer captivates us by hitting all the most difficult and beautiful shots one could imagine. For me, that’s what I remember him the most for. He was a joy to watch. Thanks to the Internet and creators like WivoRN, I still find happiness in watching these highlights ❤🙂
LOL at the 8:18 mark. .This is the RG match in 2011 where afterwards Tipsarevic said he had never seen a guy serve so accurately for so long. He couldn't believe how many serves were smack dab on the line or just barely got a piece of the line.
it is very simple for me , the way this man plays the game is so elegant and effortlessly that it does not matter if others achieve better stats. Fed is the absolute best in my book.
Roger plays the game how most would like to be able to play. And from the spectator's point of view, it's a joy to watch. I wish he still held the records though because it would have inspired more to play like he did.
Luv this man ❤ sad I missed so many of his matches 😢 😭 Wimbledon was my only chance! Till I got subscription to cable 🥳 Currently on a mission to see more ❤❤
I'd easily take Federer's career over anyone else's. Some main reasons: He played the way I would like to play. He had a stellar rise to the top in his early twenties and stayed there almost uninterrupted during his physical peak years. The rest was just a bonus. Seems peRFect to me
I loved watching Federer back when he was playing Michael Chang and was number 6. I could see the ease and smoothness. At that time there were two players like that, Nalbandian and Federer. Real fans of tennis don't care too much about GOAT, only about the way each player plays the game. Each top player brings something you can enjoy and try to emulate.
Tennis can be an interesting and beautiful game---like Fedrerer's game---or an boring baseline slugfest complete with caveman-like grunting: There are different audiences for each.
@user-yd6ef1yo9d Maybe, but usually if you play the game, you tend to be audience for every way the game is played. Obviously, nearly everyone loves to watch a player like Federer except the very biased ones. But as an amateur player, I learned a lot from players like Murray, Wilander, Djokivic, etc... simply because I can never emulate anything from Federer. I play with one handed BH, but I can't learn anything from Federer's BH either. It's too hard to take the ball early, or flick like he did. It's better to watch how Wawrinka, Edberg do it.
@@tomsd8656 Prime Andy Murray Was Such a GREAT Player...His Defense Was a Pleasure to Watch...Wish He Stayed More Aggressive on Offense Like He Did When Younger...LOVED Watching Him Play
You are 100 % right and I think Nadal summed it up perfectly ." Anyone who thinks I am a better tennis player than Roger Federer knows nothing about Tennis ".
I went to see federer live a few times, (as well as Djokovic). Both hit the ball so sweet, but the way federer hit it was so sweet that you couldn’t even process it, absolutely the definition of tennis in my humble opinion 😜 - not because of race, ethnicity or anything like that. And the days I watched him he would literally finish the match in under an hour and a half when he was in the mood. He’s literally bageled every one of the big 3 😂
Watching Federer is like poetry and thankfully doesn’t have to look at his coach after every shot and fist pump like he’s won the match - never be a more gifted player although Djokovic is dam close & taken fitness to new levels with brutal mental strength as well.
yeah i never really complain about anything since its a waste of time and people should be able to do what they want, but holy fuck is it annoying watching alcaraz fist pump and stare at jcf after every single point
@@bsrussian it's the same way with kids. My son played fairly high level tennis until he was 14, and the other kids were always looking at their parents.
@marshaloga3047 Federer lost the final and then said some really stupid shit about Nadal though lool. He said something like "he only wins when I don't take the offensive and play bad". That's not word for word. But he said this about the king of clay 😂
@@kakashihatake1029 Yes Roger said the truth definitely. If I had been federer I would have said even worse about Nadal who won coz of cheap tricks. Taking a medical time out just when he is down 5-2 in the first set claiming he had injury and then breaking fed's rhythm winning first set and then for the whole match played like an animal. Roger might have won that day coz he was on fire since start. Nadal got scared coz Novak defeated him on all clay courts that year and Fed def Novak so he had to do something like this to lower fed's game. Nadal deserved every single word Roger said.
Right, just asking to list it in the description - one more line. It's a big help when sifting through dozens of such videos (and some don't mention it at all even in the video itself). Thanks for listening. @@WivoRN
Live by the sword, die by the sword. Closing out is often much harder than coming back, especially when you play against return and counterpunch specialists like Djoker. Federer is the greatest tennis tennis player of all time
At his prime, Federer in action was pure art. He's probably the best player to ever grace the courts. But in terms of Greatest of All Time, it's time to give that title to Djokovic even though I highly dislike him. What he's achieved in his career is unbelievable. Even now when he's supposedly in decline, he's beating the best players in the world.
Federer also played and beat the best players in the world by the time he allegedly had to be "retiring" or "in decline" and most importantly, Federer lost many opportunities due to injuries, just like Nadal. Djokovic should've won since he first arrived but couldn't. I like Djoko but numbers are mathematics, they're not art. A sport is a collection of many things, none of which are mathematical principles or logic. So by saying "well, said player has more titles therefore is better" is putting all other players on even ground and negate context. If we were all machines, then sure, by all means, the machine who achieves the most is the best one. However, we're not machines are we? Human beings are not on even grounds, therefore context is needed. As much as I like Djokovic or even Nadal, between them 3, Federer is by far the best I've seen. Pure art. And Federer is not the best I've seen either. In his 2-3 year prime, Kuerten was unbelievable. And I wish I had watched Connors and Borg. I'm sure I'd also be amazed by them. People not considering Connors or McEnroe just because they didn't watch them is absolutely crazy to me. It's like saying that WW2 wasn't as bad as your regular neighborhood crime because you weren't born yet. I mean... history exists for a reason and that reason is not to be automatically discarded from day one.
Djokovic getting bonus titles from playing weaker players these days. Fed played in an era against two other younger guys in peak form contending for GOAT status already. The players on tour now going against Djokovic aren't that kind of challenge. And Nadal is constantly plagued with injuries that limit his ability. But it's okay, narrow minded people only want to look at numbers and not context. If you look at each player in their peak objectively, Fed comes out on top - other than on clay, which I hand to Nadal.
Djokovic won his 2nd GS when he was 24 though, due to his breathing issues and diet/health issues at the beginning of his career. But I guess you chose to forget he was "plagued" with some problems as well.@@taipoxin
being the greatest is not only about wins, it's about all that is off the court as well. so to me only two come into the picture. Federer and Nadal. nobody comes close.
Yes I agree, it is about being a scripted media bot who is never gonna say anything outside of the script because of their sponsors and money, real class. One more example of off-the-court staff is them trying to get lower-ranked players paid more, oh wait that was novak the "bad guy". Stay a sheep, believe what western media serves you.
History will show that Federer is not the player who won the most - just the player who played the best. Sadly, that style of play did not come with the consistency of his peers. No matter...
Generally I don’t watch tennis matches when Roger not playing and now totally stopped watching after his retirement! ‘’Roger Federer means Tennis and Tennis means Roger Federer’’ as simple as that.
There are always limitations. As far as tennis goes, Djokivic came really closed to having no limitation, but when faced with Nadal in his fit fighting form at RG, I think he would lose too, as he did on several occasions.
Y’all end to respect that Federer will always be worse then Rafa and Novak it’s just the publicity Federer got that made him great. His prime could barely win against Novak and Rafa but. Federer grass Rafa clay and Djokovic is hard court champs and Rafa is the real overall best player
Fedsqaush is over rated and was over sold to the armchair tennis players who gobbled up the marketing to sell more running shoes and watches... Mr Sqaush fed was weak mentally, weak backhand, weak return game on backhand..He only won 33% of the GS matches when he palyed novak/nadal that is total failure..same ratio in GS finals when he played novak/nadal only winning 33% of the time!! He couldn't even beat nadal once at French ..Novak beat nadal 2 times at french and total of 8 times on clay... Feds best surface was grass and lossed 3 tines inarow to Djoki wimbledon finals!!! Has a losing h2h record agaisnt both nadal/djoki too...50% of fed's titles were on the B circuit 250/500..He couldn't even win all the master tiltes either...In the end he was ok but got the goldilocks easiest ewra of tennis 2003-2009 where he won 15 slams and once nadal/djoki got going his sqaush game wilted...
There will never be another Federer, he was pure magic. Miss him❤❤❤❤
Totally agree, but Nole is even better.
A natural athlete whose movement around the court was so balletic. Miss him dreadfully and he will always be my GOAT!
I still can't believe I was sitting in the crowd that day. This level of play, the match ending a few minutes before sunset interruption... everything was magical.
This is incredible! Glad you had that experience, sir.
The greatest, and I don’t care about the titles.
Second or third greatest. Nole has the first position.
Poesia in movimento 🥇🏆
I still miss him so much ❤
That forehand at 6:00 ...oohhh...Silky smooth
Watching Federer’s videos takes me back to my life 10 years ago, before Covid, kids or mortgage.
🙂Have a good health kind stranger.
😂😂 I hear yah
The same for me...
Federer the king of tennis forever!
That time has passed. 😉
@@mlrd2687 For me it's eternity! Roger in heart!
Sorry for your loss
Good to see FedEx in action, I sure miss it... Beauty of old RUclips video
Glad you enjoyed it ❤️
Wow, he just precisely hit the ball to ball boys! 😮
Thank you! Your videos are so great! Cheers, Susan from St. Thomas, VI 💖
My pleasure, Susan! Glad you enjoy them ❤️
Best tennis of all time. Peak Federer is on its own level.
A lot of Federer fans live in regret. But I refuse to. Despite him losing a few very close matches, he also won many matches as well. He has 20 slams and over 100 career titles. I choose to be happy with what he achieved than be sad with what he lost.
Don’t cry his 38 ATP250 titles remains unbroken
@@fg92626 federer’s best will forever be better than Djokovic’s best. Good offense trounces good defense always.
Nole has won 24 GS in 3 different eras unlike this weak era player
@@MobbieKeyswell, Novak started winning more and more only when the oppositions were weak from 2011 onwards, no more prime Federer, no more prime Nadal. Murray peak was only good for 1 year. Who else gonna challenge Novak? The generation that came after the big 3 are very weak mentally!
@@MobbieKeys looks like your intelect is weak so it produces this liquid commenting
I think at his peak, Federer was the GOAT. Amazing talent. And that backhand is just a thing of beauty
that backhand that he struggled with almost his whole career and is the major reason he has a losing record against djokovic and nadal?
@@miskodj17 The back hand that I always thought was a wonderful shot.
@@annewalden3795 gasquet had the most beautiful backhand ever, how many slams does he have?
@@miskodj17 Gasquet was a good player but he can't be compared to R F . As far as I know Gasquet has not won any Grand Slam events.
@@annewalden3795 that is the whole point, beautiful shot=/=good shot, federer backhand sucks and that is it
Roger, to me, was pretty consistently classy and respectful. Loved watching him play and his relationships form over the years.
Artistry in motion!
I miss the excitement knowing that Roger will play in a game.
Miss you Roger.
I like to watch Jokovic vs Nadal. I admit this brings me imense pleasure. But, I like every match of Roger, doesn't matter the opponent. It is masterpiece every time. Roger is the peak of tennis, and the clash Jokovic vs Nadal, as well.
The Raquet Was His Paint Brush and The Court Was His Canvas...That FO Match Against Djokovic on a 40+ Match Win Streak Was IMMENSE Natural Talent on Full Display by Roger...The Shots Fed Was Making All Match Long Was JAW DROPPING!
Roger will always be the magician and GOAT in my eyes. Stats don’t matter when you see his magic…❤
Agree 100%. He's the Michael Jordan of tennis❤
But stats do matter..🤣🤣🤣Being a GOAT is not about personality, it's about results.
@@HMKHABIB1😅
@conartist I believe you are 100 % correct and I have seen magical shots from Roger for many years.
@@timothylee2772 It is about the whole package and Roger has everything required to be the G O A T in my opinion.
The greatest ever.
You forgot Nole....
As a fan, I find no reason to regret about Roger’s career. Just look at this masterpiece here. These are highlights from just one match and Federer captivates us by hitting all the most difficult and beautiful shots one could imagine. For me, that’s what I remember him the most for. He was a joy to watch. Thanks to the Internet and creators like WivoRN, I still find happiness in watching these highlights ❤🙂
Couldn't agree more! And thanks for the kind words ❤️
Man ...what a treat it was watching him. I miss his talent on the tour. I'm happy I got to see him play so many times. Thanks Roger!!
LOL at the 8:18 mark. .This is the RG match in 2011 where afterwards Tipsarevic said he had never seen a guy serve so accurately for so long. He couldn't believe how many serves were smack dab on the line or just barely got a piece of the line.
May not be the goat anymore but he’s the biggest idol for me
He is the GOAT.
Still for tennis what means jordan for basketball and Pelé for football
it is very simple for me , the way this man plays the game is so elegant and effortlessly that it does not matter if others achieve better stats. Fed is the absolute best in my book.
Roger plays the game how most would like to be able to play. And from the spectator's point of view, it's a joy to watch. I wish he still held the records though because it would have inspired more to play like he did.
Luv this man ❤ sad I missed so many of his matches 😢 😭 Wimbledon was my only chance! Till I got subscription to cable 🥳 Currently on a mission to see more ❤❤
Hope you have fun on the channel ❤️
I was always amazed that he used that one handed backhand so well.
I remember I cried for this victory. It was special. And in the final, almost won Nadal
Love your channel, never change mate.
Thanks Luis, no worries my man!
He should have won the title here!
I'd easily take Federer's career over anyone else's. Some main reasons: He played the way I would like to play. He had a stellar rise to the top in his early twenties and stayed there almost uninterrupted during his physical peak years. The rest was just a bonus. Seems peRFect to me
I'm sad that we won't see Fed playing tennis again.
I loved watching Federer back when he was playing Michael Chang and was number 6. I could see the ease and smoothness. At that time there were two players like that, Nalbandian and Federer. Real fans of tennis don't care too much about GOAT, only about the way each player plays the game. Each top player brings something you can enjoy and try to emulate.
Roger Became Spoiled Later in His Career in My Opinion...He Became Too Big of a Celebrity
Tennis can be an interesting and beautiful game---like Fedrerer's game---or an boring baseline slugfest complete with caveman-like grunting: There are different audiences for each.
@@RogerFleischer-p3f Agreed
@user-yd6ef1yo9d Maybe, but usually if you play the game, you tend to be audience for every way the game is played. Obviously, nearly everyone loves to watch a player like Federer except the very biased ones. But as an amateur player, I learned a lot from players like Murray, Wilander, Djokivic, etc... simply because I can never emulate anything from Federer. I play with one handed BH, but I can't learn anything from Federer's BH either. It's too hard to take the ball early, or flick like he did. It's better to watch how Wawrinka, Edberg do it.
@@tomsd8656 Prime Andy Murray Was Such a GREAT Player...His Defense Was a Pleasure to Watch...Wish He Stayed More Aggressive on Offense Like He Did When Younger...LOVED Watching Him Play
Always great content.. Thank you so much!
Glad you enjoyed it, my man! ❤️
well done roger!
When it comes to finesse and class , Federer is the goat
You are 100 % right and I think Nadal summed it up perfectly ." Anyone who thinks I am a better tennis player than Roger Federer knows nothing about Tennis ".
I went to see federer live a few times, (as well as Djokovic). Both hit the ball so sweet, but the way federer hit it was so sweet that you couldn’t even process it, absolutely the definition of tennis in my humble opinion 😜 - not because of race, ethnicity or anything like that. And the days I watched him he would literally finish the match in under an hour and a half when he was in the mood. He’s literally bageled every one of the big 3 😂
Race? All big 3 are same race.
Watching Federer is like poetry and thankfully doesn’t have to look at his coach after every shot and fist pump like he’s won the match - never be a more gifted player although Djokovic is dam close & taken fitness to new levels with brutal mental strength as well.
Take toilet breaks to another level😅😂
yeah i never really complain about anything since its a waste of time and people should be able to do what they want, but holy fuck is it annoying watching alcaraz fist pump and stare at jcf after every single point
@@bsrussian it's the same way with kids. My son played fairly high level tennis until he was 14, and the other kids were always looking at their parents.
El tenis más fino y "clásico". Precisión y elegancia. El de Federer.
Ok, Djoko has the best stats, but that RF backhand is an un paralleled work of art
10:22 Commentator already predicted that Fed would defeat seemingly invincible djokovic here
Unbelievable, the man is psychic! He certainly predicted that Nadal and Djokovic would have more Grand Slams than him. 😂
Nice catch! That's why I left it in
@@WivoRNgood job and nice edit. I remember this match but it never made the highlights... some shots federer made in this tournament were insane..
@marshaloga3047 Federer lost the final and then said some really stupid shit about Nadal though lool. He said something like "he only wins when I don't take the offensive and play bad". That's not word for word. But he said this about the king of clay 😂
@@kakashihatake1029 Yes Roger said the truth definitely. If I had been federer I would have said even worse about Nadal who won coz of cheap tricks. Taking a medical time out just when he is down 5-2 in the first set claiming he had injury and then breaking fed's rhythm winning first set and then for the whole match played like an animal. Roger might have won that day coz he was on fire since start. Nadal got scared coz Novak defeated him on all clay courts that year and Fed def Novak so he had to do something like this to lower fed's game. Nadal deserved every single word Roger said.
Best Roger is Australian Open 2017
Most heroic, most technic, most fighting tornament and best oponent beating of his carreer
Novak might be the GOAT but only one person made tennis art and that is Federer
Nadal is the goat, Federer is art, Novak is the machine
@@pencilcheckAnd you are delusional.
Bro Nadal is the goat of clay and not the goat of tennis that's definitely Novak... Nadal is also the weakest of the big 3
And the year was?? Why are the names and dates of the matches rarely listed in the video info??
It's in the video itself buddy, in the very first minute
Right, just asking to list it in the description - one more line. It's a big help when sifting through dozens of such videos (and some don't mention it at all even in the video itself). Thanks for listening. @@WivoRN
The most beautiful and efficient man on court ever
However, he is not efficient enough to win 24 Grand Slams.
Nole has won 24 GS in 3 different eras unlike this weak era player!! Anyone can look good when they are facing weak ass opponents
@@mlrd2687 Who cares?
roger reminded me the big serve in power in roland garros of yannick noah
Federer is an artist of tennis, most of others so called athletic players are lumberjacks in comparison. Power is effient but gets boring.
Artist of having a bad backhand? Imagine having such a bad backhand you have to hit slice more than 50% of the time
Federer Has Brutal Power as Well But The Way He Mixes His Game up Was Simply AMAZING to Watch
The best clay courter bar Nadal.
Agree with me to disagree but Roger Federer best tennis lesson ever was his 2017 Wimbledon title. THAT, sir, was a tennis lesson 👌
With Federer we're talking about art, beauty & elegances of tennis, while with Djokovic we're talking about records....
Djokos is Obviously GREAT But His Game Was a Complete BORE in My Opinion
Lo mejor del Vídeo es escuchar el Inglés-Japonés del que habla
Just another game !
The title is misleading and not fair .😮
unglaulich wieviele gute Trainer hier ihre Meinung schreiben ! aber keiner dieser Besserwisser wäre fähig diese Nati zum Erfolg zu führen !!!!
a ball hit back & forth over a net
It’s pain to be a Federer fan. He’s got all the talent but choked many big matches.
Live by the sword, die by the sword. Closing out is often much harder than coming back, especially when you play against return and counterpunch specialists like Djoker. Federer is the greatest tennis tennis player of all time
Try being a gasquet fan
@@ismailedoomun8006Or Grigor 😂😂😂
Or maybe Rafa and Novak were just to tough sometimes for Fed to close out the match!
Ever thought of that..
@@Kidgloves1984No, because they live in delusional worlds
14:29 a good time was not had by all, but he hit some good shots in the match and played reasonably close in the 2nd and 3rd sets.
Only Roger❤
#421 🐐
Tip sounded like a calf looking for momma
2011 semi final « Nadal should be Happy because djokovic won 42 matches straight »
At his prime, Federer in action was pure art. He's probably the best player to ever grace the courts. But in terms of Greatest of All Time, it's time to give that title to Djokovic even though I highly dislike him. What he's achieved in his career is unbelievable. Even now when he's supposedly in decline, he's beating the best players in the world.
Big respect for this comment and recognition. Fed will remain an icon of this sport.
Federer also played and beat the best players in the world by the time he allegedly had to be "retiring" or "in decline" and most importantly, Federer lost many opportunities due to injuries, just like Nadal. Djokovic should've won since he first arrived but couldn't.
I like Djoko but numbers are mathematics, they're not art. A sport is a collection of many things, none of which are mathematical principles or logic. So by saying "well, said player has more titles therefore is better" is putting all other players on even ground and negate context. If we were all machines, then sure, by all means, the machine who achieves the most is the best one. However, we're not machines are we? Human beings are not on even grounds, therefore context is needed.
As much as I like Djokovic or even Nadal, between them 3, Federer is by far the best I've seen. Pure art.
And Federer is not the best I've seen either. In his 2-3 year prime, Kuerten was unbelievable. And I wish I had watched Connors and Borg. I'm sure I'd also be amazed by them.
People not considering Connors or McEnroe just because they didn't watch them is absolutely crazy to me. It's like saying that WW2 wasn't as bad as your regular neighborhood crime because you weren't born yet. I mean... history exists for a reason and that reason is not to be automatically discarded from day one.
Djokovic getting bonus titles from playing weaker players these days. Fed played in an era against two other younger guys in peak form contending for GOAT status already. The players on tour now going against Djokovic aren't that kind of challenge. And Nadal is constantly plagued with injuries that limit his ability. But it's okay, narrow minded people only want to look at numbers and not context. If you look at each player in their peak objectively, Fed comes out on top - other than on clay, which I hand to Nadal.
Djokovic won his 2nd GS when he was 24 though, due to his breathing issues and diet/health issues at the beginning of his career. But I guess you chose to forget he was "plagued" with some problems as well.@@taipoxin
being the greatest is not only about wins, it's about all that is off the court as well. so to me only two come into the picture. Federer and Nadal. nobody comes close.
Yes I agree, it is about being a scripted media bot who is never gonna say anything outside of the script because of their sponsors and money, real class. One more example of off-the-court staff is them trying to get lower-ranked players paid more, oh wait that was novak the "bad guy". Stay a sheep, believe what western media serves you.
Federer: the king of nets
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 24 and Nole go for 25 😂
Not much to say, just-
❤
peRFect.
Have a nice day🙂everyone.
it is interesting how a weak tenis era player and Rafa produce monster like Novak
History will show that Federer is not the player who won the most - just the player who played the best. Sadly, that style of play did not come with the consistency of his peers. No matter...
The only tennis I'm watching now is in RUclips.......sigh these 2-hand backhanders really spoil the game......
Very happy that super pc federer is out
Before you started there was “much further ado”.
Maybe Roger could take up pickleb*** now lmao
GOATerer
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
RF,telling/calling him a chocking,its no no,in match theres loser&winner,no such chocker esp. RF d tennis king.
Djoko!
hello world 0day
Why does the umpire say “fedal” every game?
Why didn't he do that while serving for the match(title) on three 3 occasions?
The Days Roger Federer Turned 3 Tennis Match into 3 Choking Examples.
I love Fed kicking ass of those bad-tempered balkan guys 😂
29-23
27-23@@redlightsky9729
Gay Fedal intro, interesting choice. 😂
I don’t think he choked it just happens
He has to many wins to choke
I will only say: 24
Djoko...more slams
Nadal...more fit
Fed...more class and talent
Federer weak era player, he used to beat Old Sampras, Agassi, Baghdatis and Nalbadin 😅😅😅.
Serbian Face same expression on minute 14:30 remembers me the current arrogant Soberbian
Generally I don’t watch tennis matches when Roger not playing and now totally stopped watching after his retirement!
‘’Roger Federer means Tennis and Tennis means Roger Federer’’ as simple as that.
Tipsarovich was a real jerk, Hollywood with the sunglasses...I think Roger wanted to make him look bad!
Federer vs. Scarface
Federer playing Scarface
why Tipsarevib look forward federer every point? jajajaja
Fed overrated. Forever #3.
I don't know, for me Tipsi just didn't play well. For me, it wasn't a breathtaking match from either of them. So many mistakes
As talented as he was he could just NOT beat Nadal at... RG... no matter how many times he tried and couldn't even take it to a 5th set against him...
There are always limitations. As far as tennis goes, Djokivic came really closed to having no limitation, but when faced with Nadal in his fit fighting form at RG, I think he would lose too, as he did on several occasions.
Roger and Rafa. Will there ever be two nicer guys on the tennis courts again? Doubtful.
Y’all end to respect that Federer will always be worse then Rafa and Novak it’s just the publicity Federer got that made him great. His prime could barely win against Novak and Rafa but. Federer grass Rafa clay and Djokovic is hard court champs and Rafa is the real overall best player
Fedsqaush is over rated and was over sold to the armchair tennis players who gobbled up the marketing to sell more running shoes and watches... Mr Sqaush fed was weak mentally, weak backhand, weak return game on backhand..He only won 33% of the GS matches when he palyed novak/nadal that is total failure..same ratio in GS finals when he played novak/nadal only winning 33% of the time!! He couldn't even beat nadal once at French ..Novak beat nadal 2 times at french and total of 8 times on clay... Feds best surface was grass and lossed 3 tines inarow to Djoki wimbledon finals!!! Has a losing h2h record agaisnt both nadal/djoki too...50% of fed's titles were on the B circuit 250/500..He couldn't even win all the master tiltes either...In the end he was ok but got the goldilocks easiest ewra of tennis 2003-2009 where he won 15 slams and once nadal/djoki got going his sqaush game wilted...
Do you speak English as your post is nor understand and full of errors
2011 was the end of the easy ride for Federer he won nothing
And then, comes MAMBA and kill artist!!!!