Studio One - Using Reverb Effectively
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 окт 2024
- In this lesson, we look at some practical uses for reverb and go over essential tips. Please leave any questions or feedback below in the comments section.
This lesson is part of a massive Studio One Music Production Course, available for FREE here on RUclips. You can find the rest of the course at the link below.
• Studio One Music Produ...
"Why do I see/hear the word 'Lydian' in these videos?"
This Studio One course was originally created to be a standalone course outside of RUclips, and the name of that course/project was Lydian Learning. The name has now changed but everything else is the same.
---------
If you are interested in supporting me directly, you can visit my website for details:
www.maxkonyi.com/
Thank you!
---------
Do you want to chat music with me? I’ve got a Discord for that! YT_LINE_BREAK
Visit my website to learn more about me and the content I create:
www.maxkonyi.com/
---------
Join my Discord server! A supportive community of musicians and producers. Ask questions, get feedback, and participate in weekly production challenges:
/ discord
Thanks for your excellent explanation and the good practical relevance!
Very good presentation. Understood well. Thank you.
✨🌞✨
Hi max great video.I got two questions. First isn't it better to put the reverb on the out of the channel? Or maybe Isn't it better to create an effect channel and send there the tracks? Thanks
Yes! I have other videos covering the use of sends for things like reverb, which I much prefer. At this point in the course, that had not been introduced yet I don't think. My memory is blurry...
not everyone talked about this huge topic, i used to add alot of washy reverb , whihc i loved to do ,but now im doing it in a controlled way
Yes me too! Glad to hear it was helpful. Controlled use usually ends up with a better result. It also allows you to use reverb in extreme ways more effectively because it can contrast other elements.
Great video
Thanks Ed!
Nicely explain...and great sounding song.
🙏🏻⚡️🙏🏻
Loved this video man. You really explain in a clear and concise fashion and I like how intuitive are your thoughts and opinions. Made a lot of sense to me as I'm learning to mix and master. Followed you on instagram and youtube. Will be looking forward to more content from you.
Happy to hear that! 🙏🏼
Thanks for your tips. :)
No problem!
Hi Max, great video as usual. One question: is there difference between copying the effect from one track to another instead of dragging the same effect twice from the browser? Do we get two independent instances of the effect in both cases, do we have the same cpu consume in both cases?
Good question! Both ways will create separate instances, there is no way to save on CPU here unless you send multiple instruments to an FX Channel or Bus and use a single reverb.
Dragging from one track to another will copy the settings of the first reverb to the second one, where dragging from the browser will use default settings.
Great lesson! Why does almost everyone choose for the Room Reverb plug-in? I don’t see a lot of video’s on the MixVerb and OpenAIR? Is there a reason?
Room Reverb and MixVerb are both algorithmic reverbs. Room Reverb is more flexible and sounds better, so the choice is easy.
OpenAIR is a convolution reverb which means it works with 'recordings' (impulse responses) of real spaces. This makes it very realistic but not very flexible. Sometimes realism is important, other times not. This can be the factor for deciding between Room Reverb and OpenAIR.
Max! This is macs. lol thanks for the awesome videos. You just gained a (twin) subscriber :)
✨🌞✨
Glad you're digging it!
Learned more about reverb in 15 minutes than after years of using them...incorrectly. BTW - When can we expect the Lydian Loops Beatbox Collection?
Haha glad to hear it ✨
Good idea on the Beatbox Collection...
And thank you for all the kind comments 🙏
Let me ask you one complicated question: do you think it is possible for Studio One room reverb to imitate the reverb *inside of* a piano? Inside of the upright there is a lot of reverb going on which still can be perceived from the outside. I'd love to simulate that. But when I typed in "1 m" for size... I still ended up with some sort of room that had real room dimensions and the piano sounded like being pushed back into the background. I'd love to have a real room reverb but within some 10 ms everything should be over already, so that the sound stays concise. Do you have an idea?... or is recording from a real piano the only way of obtaining these results?
Very interesting question! First of all, are you talking about the internal resonance of a piano within itself? If so, high-quality piano sample libraries will usually emulate this quite well. If you're just talking about a very small room reverb, also often called an "ambience", you could look in the convolution reverb that comes with S1 called Open AIR. In there, you should be able to find some very short tails. Convolution reverbs are based on impulse responses (IR) which are actually recordings of real spaces. When going for realism, this often a good approach. What do you think?
@@maxkonyi great answer Max. Yeah, the internal resonance. Actually, I want to have it both ways in the same song: during passages for accompaniment I want the sound to be 100% dry, so it gets as concise as possible. But for solo, I'd like to have a bit of reverb, so I'll try the other reverb! Great idea. Or maybe I'll try that "Mixverb", I've just looked that up.... on studio one and try a really short tail.
@@thomastreppenhauerphotosho3972 Sounds perfect. I haven't great results with Mixverb in the past, but perhaps you will get lucky :)
Is it possible to remove room reverb that exists in your recording?
Yes and no. What is the recording of?
I have a problem with Studio One 4 room reverb being really noisy and affecting the whole mix even if it's on one track or say, vocal bus. Any ideas why?
Not sure what you mean exactly. In what way is it being noisy?
no action talk talk ???
???