I left teaching after 9 years due to being called a "marxist" and "communist" because I taught Fredrick Douglas in a history class in MARYLAND!!! if you don't know, Douglas was from.......MARYLAND!!!!! absolutely broke my heart to leave the profession I worked so hard to enter. After serving two combat deployments in the Marines I just don't connect with America anymore. Sad. Now I work in the mental health field.
It's amazing, because I studied to teach Social Studies and finding a History Teaching job became so difficult that I gave up and stuck with a different career path. Now, it appears people want to learn less and less about actual history, when it was rather muddy to begin with. People don't want to learn the reality of our past because some of it makes them uncomfortable. But being ignorant to the facts and truth is the complete opposite of how to fix that. When I hear someone on TV or in a movie say something completely historically inaccurate, even minor, I get really annoyed, but when it's serious and extremely ridiculous I get really angry. I also spent most of my life growing up in Maryland after moving up from upstate New York and remember learning all about Slavery and how it really effect our national and state's history. Thanks for spending so much time teaching the truth and facts, and serving in the Marine Corps!
😂the mental health field?? THATS PERFECT!!😮 PERHAPS YOU CAN COUNCIL THIS HYPOCRITE-CLOWN RIGHT HERE!!😂😂 JON "I PRETEND I CARE, BUT IM ACTUALLY HERE TO PUMP THE RATINGS SO MY BANK ACCOUNT GROWS AND GROWS" STEWART!!!😑👍
The worst thing to happen to the news media is the 24 hour news channels. they've got 24 hours to fill and they cater to their viewers. inciting the masses takes priority over informing the masses.
It's just like 24-hour sports channels. They have to talk about something, and for everywhere but fox, it's how much Trump sucks, and on Fox it's how much Biden sucks.
A 24 hour news cycle and what's their go-to line whenever an interview shows signs of becoming informative? '....well, that's all the time we have.......' No shit? You have NOTHING BUT TIME!!!!!! They're SO full of shit these klowns, it would take weeks and a decent crowd to kick it out of them.
@@DaleGribble1 because every show needs sponsors and writers, while this kind of show is also a lot likely to need lawyers. Having all that in place in a contract and not being personally responsible for everyones paychecks and legal defenses also helps them perform better. They can always move somewhere else if and when it gets complicated, but some shielding will always be appreciated
@@loremaster8475 Precisely. The subconscious part of the human brain cannot distinguish between negatives and positives. If you constantly taking about „Trump is bad“, „Don‘t vote Trump“, the subconsciousness only hears „Trump“. That‘s why psychology recommends to have your goal be „Have a normal and healthy body“ instead of „Not being fat anymore“. Both are meaning the same, but in the second case, your brain only hears FAT. In regards to politics it means STOP TALKING ABOUT THE FASCISTS, FOR FUCKS SAKE. But they won‘t. Because it brings views and clicks and engagement. Jon is guilty too.
Well, when raygun got elected. I SAID THE SAME THING. I'VE NEVER TRUSTED ALL OF OUR GOVERNMENTS AGENCIES SINCE norman OKRAhoma acknowledged IT WAS A SUNDOWNER TOWN!! WAKE THE FACT UP IDIOTS!!! WAKE UP TO THE PEOPLES REAL HISTORY!!!!!🙄
Related to previous comments it should be pointed out that as a general rule in most of the networks and I would say local stations TV stations radio stations tickly TV stations the news is handled by the entertainment division clear informative news isn't always alone quote entertaining
@Apollo's Crow no it's not. A corporation exists to acquire money. If you have ethics you get the talk or shown the door. It's that simple. The instant Jon says anything that hurts Apple share price he is gone. There are no ethics under capitalism. In fact the very notion is a form of propaganda.
I'm from the UK. And I can't tell you enough how much I wish we had someone like Jon and how much I admire him. One of the greatest Americans in my mind. He's someone that lights the way.
What's kinda galling is that John Oliver is English, and we lost him to the US. Over here he was a failing comic, over there he's an Emmy award winning journalist whose program runs incredibly well researched segments. We have Ian Heslop, and Jonathan Pie. They're good, but John and Jon are great, true G.O.A.T's of their trade.
Jon, please, and I beg you, never ever leave us again. I know you didn't 'leave us', as you have done so much while you were away from hosting a show --- but, to those whose access to your light is limited, it was a dark decade without you.
Jon is very good but you also have to remember Trevor had better not gone where Jon goes. How dare him make those comments. Some but not all people are fools.
I think it was Jon himself who pointed out how the media landscape changed post-9/11, in that every news story became a critical, breaking news headline. The drama of presenting events, particularly events involving war, natural disasters, mechanical mishaps, and political intrigue have distorted our ability to differentiate between what's important, what's not, and what's being underserved. Once the corporate boards of major news networks saw the spike in viewership after the attacks on the WTC and the Pentagon, they knew that their round-the-clock coverage would be able to keep them on the ratings charts, all while crowing about how critical their coverage is to the public. I'm of the mind that 24/7 news in the age of digital transmission has made for a reactionary news base. I'm of the age that remembers "the evening news" when a familiar anchor would come out and read the day's events in a tone that could put Mr. Rogers to sleep. No embellishment, just the stated facts, and if it was really important, you'd maybe follow up with morning radio or the newspaper the next day, or wait for any updates coming the next evening. But now it's instantaneous. Now you have to be the first to report so that you don't lose viewers or appear to be falling behind. And every story is carried with equal measure and weight, every headline displayed in the same font, all given in the same delivery. It could be a hurricane landing on the Atlantic coast, or a plane that went down over Iowa, or a statue being removed from it's plinth, or an organized protest taking place in Brazil - all these stories are brought to the public as being critical to note. Look at what's happening now with the war in Ukraine - hardly anything domestic gets spoken about with the same intensity or prevalency. It IS important, but this hourly update routine is exhausting, because they're turning a travesty of geopolitical warfare into a spectator sport. In the same way that I listen to sports analysts going over the details of trade rumors, or game predictions, or player injuries, news anchors and the pundits they hire to come give "expert insight" are essentially doing the same thing - trying to second guess what's about to happen, or even more egregiously, declaring a victory before one has yet to surface. It's not the way people need to get informed. It's watered down entertainment for political junkies and partisans.
I agree, let’s further this conversation. When the news merged into entertainment. News shouldn’t be confused with entertainment media. 24 hrs news cycle are overwhelming and desensitize the viewer to the urgency of the topic being spoken about.
Actually, that happened with the advent of CNN, not 911. That was going on LONG before. The fact is that the news was ALWAYS biased and was never 'news', it was what three or four corporations wanted you to think. That hasn't changed. Just now in 'the economist' their headline is how 'humanitys fate is hanging on ukraine'. Thats odd that they didn't think that when Iraqis or Afghans were dying. Compare the news from Ukraine with how Iraq was reported. Hell, in Iraq they wouldn't even show soldiers coffins returning from Iraq. THAT hasn't changed from, well, EVER. Analysis of reporting from the seventies on Vietnam and Indonesia, where the US was providing arms showed just how biased the media is. And it shouldn't be a suprise, news from an empire will of course favour the empire. Romans didn't hear news critical of the Roman empire but about all the horrible things the savages did. THat of course should not be taken as any kind of comment that lets Russia off the hook for the invasion, I think the attention it gets is how it SHOULD be handled. But Iraq and Afghanistan and places where the US illegally invaded should be discussed in much the same way. To be fair, like Russia, at the time there were the largest protests ever recorded AGAINST the war. It didn't stop the war, but when governments are clearly going against the wishes of their own people should be something the media focuses on, but of course isn't going to.
Man you hit the nail on the head. On the flipside I'm 30. I grew up in the wake of 9/11 so this is all I've ever really known. I'm so appreciative of Jon Stewart for telling me that this isn't normal or healthy as I was growing up. And I think with my age group just generally speaking avoid CNN, Fox, etc. That's not inherently a good thing either, as getting your info from random posters on Twitter or 4chan isn't exactly better. It's just so frustrating and I've such a hatred for the media corporations. They created this nightmare environment where I feel like I've to take everything with boulders of salt in relentless pursuit of profit. And with photoshop technology and now deep fakes becoming more advanced and cheaper by the second, I already know I can't trust my own eyes unless I'm seeing something firsthand. It's completely maddening.
The Democrat Party Inconvenient Truth: The 2020 US Presidential election was stolen. The 2016 US Presidential election was almost stolen. In 2016 Bill " Slick Willie" Clinton was the con man. Donald Trump was a Republican "plant" recruited by Bill Clinton to help Hillary Clinton win the 2016 US Presidential election. The Clinton election theft plan backfired because Donald Trump couldn't stay ahead of Hillary Clinton's continuous damaging Wikileaks. Part One: Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and Donnna Brazile all publicly claimed that the Clintons rigged the 2016 Democrat Party nomination. Wikileaks proved this. Part Two: New York Times reporter Amy Chozick wrote in her book "Chasing Hilary" that in 2014 Bill "Slick Willie" Clinton "casually encouraged" Donald Trump to run for President in 2016. Why would Bill "Slick Willie" Clinton do that? Part Three: May of 2015, one month after Hillary Clinton declared her candidacy for President in 2016 as a Democrat, Bill "Slick Willie" Clinton called Donald Trump and they talked about Presidential politics. Three weeks later Donald Trump announced his candidacy for President in 2016 as a Republican. The Washington Post covered this story. Now you know the truth! The Democrats tried to steal the 2016 US Presidential election but failed. They succeeded in 2020, however. But at a future cost.
@@johnbartlett9568 1. Wikileaks. 2. The New York Times. 3. The Washington Post. All valid sources prove the Clinton Democrats tried to steal the 2016 US Presidential election by first rigging the 2016 DNC Presidential nomination and then recruiting Donald Trump to run as a Republican "plant". The Clintons first rigged the 2016 Democrat Primary. Democrats Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and Donna Brazile all claim this based on Wikileaks. Bill "Slick Willie" Clinton then contacted Donald Trump TWICE about running for President in 2016 as a Republican. The Clinton Democrats 2016 US Presidential election theft attempt backfired because Donald Trump couldn't stay ahead of Hillary Clinton's damaging Wikileaks.
@@pm.meowth4850 WRONG! Please explain 2016. Democrats Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and Donna Brazile all publicly claim that the Clintons stole the 2016 Democrat Primary nomination. They made their accusations based on Wikileaks releases. Please also explain why in 2014 Bill "Slick Willie" Clinton "casually suggested" to Donald Trump that Trump should run for President in 2016. New York Times reporter Amy Chozik wrote this in her book "Chasing Hillary". In May 2015 - one month after Hillary Clinton announced her 2016 Presidential candidacy as a Democrat - the Washington Post reported that Bill "Slick Willie" Clinton called Donald Trump and talked Presidential politics. Bill "Slick Willie" Clinton told Donald Trump that Donald Trump should "play a larger role in the Republican Party" and to "focus on GOP base voters." Less than three weeks later Donald Trump announced his 2016 Presidential candidacy as a Republican. Bill Clinton TWICE suggested to Donald Trump that Trump should run for President. Why dould Bill Clinton do that? The Clinton Democrats tried to steal the 2016 US Presidential election but failed. Donald Trump couldn't stay ahead of Hillary Clinton's continuous Wikileaks. Extrapolate 2016 to 2020!
The truth is that Trump and his inner circle had many connections to shady rich Russians and pro-russian Ukrainians. It's a fact no matter if the media blew it.
And I say it would occur within a 24 hour period. But at the same time, lies and invented fantasy led to the criminal nonsense in January of last year. We do not need "truth" as much as the nation needs to obtain a minimum basic education. Educated minds can handle truth. It is and always has been intentional ignorance which is the problem.
Jon's at his best when he's skewering cable news media. This was vintage Daily Show. I'm a huge, huge fan of Jon's, this is just the best content I've seen out of him since he retired from TDS
I love that he is free of many leashes cable tv had him tied to. He can now say cum to his heart's content. lol Although, his colorful ways of describing "bad" words on Comedy Central were themselves rather funny.
This is a backhanded compliment. You're almost calling him a one-trick pony (which he is not). Wait, so the one bit he does on so called "liberal" (really NEOliberal) corporate news is his best work? Dude, this is merely a regurgitation of all the stuff he did on TDS - and his peak TDS work was better than this. His work on Collateralizd Debt Obligations was his AMAZING. It was so good, my economics professor used it to explain CDOs and Credit Default Swaps in college. This is just recycling his old "corporate media cares about profits not truth" thesis on TDS (and he's 100% correct). It's great, dont get me wrong, but this isn't really a compliment the way you meant it. He's done far better material than this imo, both since his return and TDS. This was a repetition of so many of his stellar media critiques on TDS with more current material. His work on the stock market and on climate change was better. This is shit we already knew from his incredible work on TDS. He's the one that got Crossfire cancelled, remember?
@@seanphurley I'll repeat what I told the original poster. This is a backhanded compliment. You're almost calling him a one-trick pony (which he is not). Wait, so the one bit he does on so called "liberal" (really NEOliberal) corporate news is his best work? Dude, this is merely a regurgitation of all the stuff he did on TDS - and his peak TDS work was better than this. His work on Collateralizd Debt Obligations was his AMAZING. It was so good, my economics professor used it to explain CDOs and Credit Default Swaps in college. This is just recycling his old "corporate media cares about profits not truth" thesis on TDS (and he's 100% correct). It's great, dont get me wrong, but this isn't really a compliment the way you meant it. He's done far better material than this imo, both since his return and TDS. This was a repetition of so many of his stellar media critiques on TDS with more current material. His work on the stock market and on climate change was better. This is shit we already knew from his incredible work on TDS. He's the one that got Crossfire cancelled, remember?
@@feynmanschwingere_mc2270 what are you even fighting about my man. read the post--"jon has many talents" is not "one trick pony". you are right this is a regurgination of TDS, which is why aprove of it. He has better material than this, but it is of him doing commentary on media. His work on stock market and climate change was nowhere near as good imo.
@jessebadry, please educate yourself about CRT. It has not ever been a part of public school curriculum. The Republicans made up their own definition and manufactured an issue out of the letters and used it to scare and manipulate their base...and it worked!
I had no clue he was doing this again. Thank you so much Jon and others like you for doing what needs to be done and bringing the truth to light for us. Selfish as hell, but I needed this in my life right now. Thank you again.
I am 100% grateful for Jon Stewart. He IS still trusted FAR MORE than ANY news channel or anchor.. it OUGHT to be embarrassing for Journalists that a comedian does their job better than they do… REGARDLESS of the channel or anchor.. ALL OF THEM pale by comparison. None hold a candle to his trustworthiness as one who fully delivers the news in a way that INFORMS his audience as well as providing solid humor as well. We are given FACTUAL, RESOURCED NEWS from Stewart. Who else actually does that without worrying about their ratings as well as knowledge of stories?
Jon Stewart is woke. No this isn’t the return of Stewart. Cherry picking clips and editing them was always what Jon Stewart did but to pretend he’s some kind of moral high ground. It’s Orange Man Bad Stewart
I like when the news starts a story then they say they have an expert. They show the expert, who coincidentally just wrote a book about this. They plug the book and are asked a simple question that goes on for too long. Then then the shot pulls out and there is a panel of like 10 people talking over each other for the next 5 minutes.
At the end, one is left trying to figure out the answers, the way I see it, the coming generations are gonna want short vids like on Tiktok, I make fun of my daughter because she'll spend hours watching 30 sec vids, I wouldn't be surprised if news media moves to Tiktok and the such if they haven't already.
Tbh, I like Trevor Noah, he's equally hilarious and brings his own unique insights to these issues... That being said, Jon Stewart is a freaking LEGEND! SOOOOOO glad to see him back doing what he does best, skewering the MSM and cracking us all up in the process! 😅😂🤣 Trevor Noah had to start back from Square 1 to get anywhere close to this good, Jon Stewart is a freaking PRO...🥰♥️😍😅😂🤣
@@jesserogalski1402 Nope, trevor is just as good as jon. both are amazing, but given the fact i started watching the show when it was trevor, i am biased towards trevor.
Since CNN traded in its reporters and support staff for news personalities it is only capable of handling about 3 news stories a day. If it finds one its audience is drawn to it will ride that horse mercilessly as long as it can walk and will continue to beat it after it stumbles and dies.
I honestly believe that if the media companies hired LESS people at ridiculously high wages for personalities, and focused on simple shoe-leather reporting, they would actually make more money because people would begin to trust them and actually watch.
Thought this would be a Stewart Fox News bash when it started, but thankfully, he held the best for the second half - the evisoration of the left leaning media and the Ruasian Hoax. The Original Big Lie. Brought to you by the Clinton Campaign and James Comey. NewsCum - perfect!
I’m a visual artist (painter) and my works are mostly satirical and Jon is one of the individuals that’s influenced that the most. Up there with Voltaire. He’s a satirical savant
Part of the problem is the 24Hr news cycle. It leaves you having to spin events into news. Sort of like a high school essay with a word count threshold. At some point you start attaching an adjective next to every noun you can find to meet the prescribed word count.😂
They never cover some of the things they should, though. They could cover labor issues. They don't cover a lot of the mass shootings. They don't cover environmental issues (like dumping) very often. They almost never cover corruption. They don't like to cover science-related topics in general. Jon was calling out all of the fluff pieces they do instead.
@@ryanburchett8455 True. But substantive reporting of that sort requires time and money. Weeks worth of investigating vs. tracking Florida man fleeing from the cops on the highway
I once saw a channel that just showed random events all day. Sadly forgot what it was called. Just footage of bridges collapsing, strikes, demonstrations, war footage. There is more than enough stuff happening in the world for a 24h news cycle. But modern media always wants a 'narrative'. If their anchors cannot get some kind of 'story' from an event - no mater how big it may be - then you're most likely not going to see it. Just compare the Ukrainian war coverage with the Yemen war coverage. the first can be beautifully spun as a story of heroes. My local paper as it's own segment "What happened this night in the war' EVERY SINGLE morning. I think I have not read more than 10 articles about Yemen in the last 5 years.
@@AUG_XZABER John Oliver's delivery is rancid, though. Even if he may have interesting things to talk about, whenever he tries to make things funny, he acts like a completely pompous, over-the-top clown. I guess I'm spoiled rotten by Jon's calm, unaccented (I'm sorry, but a British accent does give someone an air of better-than-thou) demeanor and delivery, but...part of being an informative comedian is being able to address the absurdity of it all without looking like you're trying too hard. And John Oliver *definitely* comes off as trying *far* too hard.
Jon Stewart for President. Write him in for 2024. Forget those other 2. We can do this. Let's take it viral!!! Jon Stewart is the hero this country needs.
Stewart , been watching you since early daily show. Love the ability to make us laugh at our own destruction, while simultaneously motivating us to do something about it, even if it’s just to take accountability for the media we watch and the way we inform ourselves.
Great segment. The news coverage in the USA needs a MAJOR overhaul. I live in Germany now and the news over here is so refreshing. The problem with these networks in the USA is they need to pump every small thing up to 10 to keep viewers locked in so they over sensationalize EVERYTHING. there is not enough actual engaging news to keep a network on 24/7 with interesting topics. I really appreciate that you didn't just go after Fox news for 20 minutes. You were even handed and gave a slap in the face to nearly every network.
@@alucard1116 no argument there. There is a little bit of "both sides" here to go around as far as the media in general, but the right is far far worse literally spreading false information to stoke the fires of hatred. Totally agree.
@@jacobseal It’s why I get frustrated with just blanket statements. We can deal with the kind of limp wristed journalism in the US after we solve the larger problem of literal propagandists succeeding at turning millions of Americans against democracy. That is my big concern today.
@@alexandrelavergne7961 What specific lie are you referring to? And let’s be clear everyone lies. The issue is what certain people and organization lie about that is the issue. But you knew that already right? It’s not like you would pretend jaywalking and murder were equivalent crimes right?
I remember when journalists reported the news rather than speculating on what the news might be. It feels like maybe 10% of the news is actually reporting, the rest is just ridiculous speculation.
They don't have many reporters left to do actual investigations themselves. They pull off the wire the work of other people and the stories hand fed to them by their "news source" (governmentaly sterilized rendition of the events) Then they chop it up and mold it to their narrative. They can then sensationalize it and manipulate the viewers into the fear driven ratings system that gets them corporate profits. All the while creating a massive divide in the country that will one day lead to conflicts between neighbors, if not an all out civil war of ideology. Welcome to the Rush Limbaugh model of modern journalism. (I give him credit since he is the one I remember from my earliest inquiries into politics back in the 90's. Maybe he didn't start it but to me he is the culprit in this model. There were other right wing radio talk show hosts doing this, but he was by far the most popular at the time)
Nowadays they speculate and sensationalise to chase ratings. On both sides, they also appeal to bias, so they are not really journalists anymore. There are a few good investigative journalists out there but they write books and intellectual columns based on evidence. Most people don’t read anything of value any more.
Jon is THE ONLY journalist calling out politicians and “journalists” on their BS. He explains why they’re wrong in simple, understandable ways so that even a child can understand. We need more Jon Stewart’s and journalists who refuse to play the “access” game. In other words, journalists must make politicians (both Democrats as well as Republicans) afraid of their election(s).
@@kittyonmydesk5532 I held a meeting with two and they confirmed that a restaurant is being constructed so that they’ll eat the rich! I’ll give you my review next Tuesday 😋😍
@@HarloffGoes2GalaxysEdge Close enough and a fair better entertainer to actually make something so serious humorous. God bless this guy... he needs all the power he can get. i means Jesus bless this guy. Not a common saying for some reason... he says knowingly.
I'm not even on the Left and I like Jon Stewart. There's a huge market for people who tell you what they really think. I don't care if you disagree with me, just be honest.
@David WilliamsonI loved their interview. You could tell Jon isn't used to being challenged from the left or a populist standpoint. I'm not bashing him for it, it helps sharpen his thoughts and ideas. You can tell he's used to destroying liberal and conservative hacks, and that's great. The important part is he isn't afraid to be challenged. He's an honest actor willing to discuss things instead throwing punches immediately like a contradictory view is a call to arms.
@Mickey_ValentineIt doesn't really... it was just a platform for leaks like the name implies. In that sense it's crowdsourced without quantitative benefit but they wouldn't publish an investigation about claims by other media.
One of the problems is that there is never enough real "news" to fill 24 hours. There isn't enough local news to even fill 30 minutes, usually. This is even true with internet - shows (whether its RUclips or TikTok or Facebook or whatever) have to fill time with something. But that doesn't mean a person has to watch all that crap. It really is up to the viewer to be discerning and not fill their minds with trash, just like you shouldn't load up at Burger King every day for every meal, or even eat steak or expensive desserts for every single meal.
There definitely is, that’s why you can have international/weather/sports sections. To fill in the gaps with information that may be seemingly unnecessary to disseminate on a grand scale, but a few members of the audience will appreciate.
Imagine if the news media actually took it upon themselves to report on issues in depth and actually discuss the nuances and complexity that controversies can have. Then again, the public doesn’t want to pay or watch that sort of thing, so I guess we are screwed
For better or for worse, a _lot_ of people are slowly moving away from watching TV-style news towards other sources. It's definitely a mixed bag because while some people will spend more time actually looking into the data on a given issues and put more time and thought into their positions, it's very easy for people who don't know any better to get swept up into the alt-right very quickly, and once you're in it can be very difficult to escape.
@@ChicagoRic360 gen z literaly just started consuming the news we have now, if anything this is the fault of the boomers for making 24/7 news cycle normalized.
@@ChicagoRic360 A lot earlier that that. I'm 70 and I remember. ABC / NBC / CBS wanted to ELIMINATE news coverage in the '60s. The FCC licensed the public airways to them and told them they had a responsibility to report news to the public. OK. But they cut nightly news from a full hour to half an hour, and sought ratings by adding fluff. That still didn't make a profit but it reduced their loss. Oh, and talked Walter Conkrite into early retirement.
Main stream media is controlled by the *rich*. I highly recommend watching the RUclips videos: _"Can You Trust the Media? | Manufacturing Consent Explained"_ _"Capitalism And Monopolies: How Five Companies Control All US Media"_
Nice to see Jon doing his greatest hits, no one can deconstruct the media like he can, the bit with the Muller report was outstanding, my sides hurt now ouch !
@@RickJasonObrero11 Please don’t tell me you’re one of those who fell for Colbert’s character 😂 Dw bcs I also miss the days before he left for CBS. His character was legendary
Mr Stewart- Bless you and thank you for serving satiating nurishment in a cafeteria of empty calories. 🍽 Thank you for sharing your show on YT. You and your team are doing God’s work, sir. ✊ No one does it like you. 🐐🙏🏼
So glad you're back. I just realized you have a show again. You kept me sane during the Bush years and your current events inspired comedy is oddly comforting despite the topics you cover.
Didn't help you much during the Obama years, in which Obama went on to bomb Pakistan, Libya, Syria, Somalia, and Yemen. Obama was as much of a liar as George W. Bush was, and Bush was a tremendous liar. If you think the US bombed Syria because "Assad is gassing his own people" or that he bombed Libya "to prevent a humanitarian crisis" - it's because people like Jon Stewart are really partisan hacks, and they will only tell you the truth when the Republican leadership is lying, not when the Democratic leadership is lying.
It’s comforting when you know you’re not being deceived like the mainstream media always is attempting to do. It’s comforting because Jon is someone we can trust. Unlike the talking heads on MSM!
@@anderseckstrand7033 You think you can trust Jon Stewart? Obama started bombing 5 new nations, and lied to start two wars. Do you know what the lies were? Can you name those 5 nations? I respected Stewart when he CORRECTLY called out the Bush administration for lying us into the Iraq War. Stewart didn't bother to do that with Obama when his administration lied us into the Syrian and Libyan war. He didn't say anything when our propaganda said "Ukraine had a revolution" - they didn't, it was a CIA coup. We know this with ABSOLUTE certainty because Victoria Nuland was recorded choosing the next "leader" of Ukraine - 3 weeks before the "Maidan revolution". Stewart is just a partisan hack. All his fake sincerity about having open discussion and talking truth to power is a facade. He's a nothing more than a shill for the democratic party no matter what crime they do. He'll criticize the republicans when they commit crimes (and he should), but never the democrats, ever. This man isn't respectable. He's a sellout just like Colbert is.
Such an important message to the media which I fear will be ignored by the people that need to absorb it most - I'm so sick and tired of the media beating everything up, it's so draining, disheartening, and numbing - no wonder it's difficult to keep electorates engaged on important issues. Endless cycles of nauseatingly recycled conjecture, "expert" opinion, lies, propaganda, fear, outrage and anticipation-peddling often just built on bs or nothing new or of substance.
Jon sums up why people don’t trust the media and how certain media outlets push their own political narratives, even if unfounded in facts. Well done, Jon.
@@web-angel Jon Stewart criticized CNN and MSNBC all the time, especially in 2011, when Nancy Pelosi stated that she would not answer any questions about Anthony Weiner and then the news media left that press conference.
Jon, i lost track of you over the years after daily show. But after the recent Guardian article about leaving apple tv i thought id look you up here hoping you were broadcasting here. It is such a treat to see you are and i hope your subscribers go through the roof. Great to see you again. Looking forward to listening to sanity again..
Jon Stewart, you are the greatest thing that came to 21st century America. Can this approach to commentary succeed? I don't think nuance is something we can hope for from Tucker Carlson. But it should work to get reasonable people to see the truth. I'm too cheap to buy Apple TV+. I really appreciate being able to watch it here. Thank you so much.
Doesn't that kind of make Jon also a part of the problem. Our need to make everything that should be informative into entertainment is what he's talking about and here we are.
I'm so glad Jon Stewart is giving this issue a platform. Most people will call you a conspiracy theorist talking about stuff like this, but now this might actually go mainstream
Just like MSM, it depends on how you present it. If you present it like Mike Pillow, then you'll be dismissed as a loon, but if it is objective without filling it up with noise, then you sound a bit more credible. Qanon had a bad reputation when everything they said was strictly partisan and niche to Democratic Hollywood Elites, but after finding out and defending Trump's image with Epstein, they sort of dissolved. The amount of energy they put in to uncovering Democrats, if that was applied universally and cogently, then a lot more people would've taken it seriously and not dismiss it like they do with MTG space lasers or existence. A person who is worse than MTG is Tulsi Gabbard who is smart and was liked by independents, Democrats, and Republicans. How she carries and tones things makes people listen; even if it is dangerous or misleading.
Everything that was true since Trump decided to run according to msm has been false and everything that was considered conspiracy has been truth. Biden is in the White House because real journalism was banned before the election…..see Hunter Biden’s laptop. If all the msm reported on that as the truth it is, does anyone really think Joe would have had a chance? Thinking our country would be in a much better situation than it is now if it weren’t for our lying state media….
On the one hand, lol. On the other, locate a single source of insight or information worth a goddamn that isn't hosted on a massive corporate platform. Please, go ahead.
Yeah! How dare he exist in this flawed world! lol I get where you're coming from but at a certain point it's physically impossible not to be a bit of a hypocrite and still function. Own a cellphone = Hypocrite. Buy suspiciously cheap clothing= hypocrite. Buy anything from Nestle= hypocrite. Buy anything made in Russia now and probably soon China= hypocrite. Etc. ad infinitum. Thinking about it for too long makes me want to go live in the woods and grow my own food... Which would end badly lol. 🤣
@@mayaenglish5424 you know he could have started a RUclips channel, while he would still be on a massive corporate platform, he would still be more or less independent, but he didn't do that because apple TV paid him
@@quatreraberbawinner2628 That's just not realistic, First of all, the dude has bills to pay too. The daily show didn't make THAT much money lol. Also, Do you want an actual tv show with a staff of writers and camera operators and lighting and interviews with important people? Because you don't get any of that with Jon Stewart sitting in his room by himself with a crappy camera/audio set up that he doesn't know how to use because he's old (Sorry Jon, but I've watched you use zoom during the pandemic) and only booking people that he personally can get a hold of (Which might be a lot based off of who he is but certainly not as much as he can get with a professional set up.)
I'll always remember "Summer of the Shark" where you couldn't turn on the news without hearing about shark attacks. It started with one dramatic incident that captured people's attention, but then the media glommed onto it. They reported every time someone just saw a shark, and over-hyped everything. Really played into people's fears and made it seem like shark attacks were on the rise, when in reality there were fewer shark attacks that year than average. Stuff like that is why I didn't take COVID seriously at first, until I actually read what doctors were saying. Over-hyped banalities from the news media is so dangerous, but at the same time I feel like it's so difficult to discuss it with nuance because you'll always get the damned conspiracy theorists and the far right folk saying, "see we told you libtard new media lies". Sigh.
Jeff Daniel's character in "The Newsroom" put it perfectly when he said that, when the CRTC mandated that all networks must provide one hour of news per day, they should have said it has to be commercial free.
Good one. When watching the news, watch out for the words "could, should, might". When you hear those words, you are no longer watching news. You are being lead down a rabbit hole.
Part of the problem is the abundance of 24/7 "news" channels that are in constant need for new information and content all the freaking time. When was the last time something wasn't "breaking news?" Each agency has their own demographic, which they need to reinforce their audience (thought bubble) - which is why Fox is right-wing and the others lean left (or far-left). You know what might be neat - a source of unbiased, un-editorialized news - it would last perhaps 30 minutes each day (reporting just the facts doesn't take that long) - then we could opt-in to editorialized content if we desire or have absolutely nothing better to do. Watching a lot of those clips when they got to the "if true" part - I noticed many of them had an undeniable smile and excitement that Trump could be going to jail - if true.
I'm a journalist full-time. You're 99% right, but I'd be very hesitant to say there's any far-left cable news network in the U.S. Even MSNBC was largely skeptical of Bernie Sanders, with Chris Matthews comparing his primary victories to the Nazis conquering France and going on a rant about how "if the reds had won the cold war I would have been executed in Time Square" when people criticized him for it. There is no mainstream news network in the United States with a communist or even socialist orientation. Unfortunately our political spectrum is completely imbalanced and that's why you see Fox News expounding openly white supremacist rhetoric whereas even our "far left" networks are spooked by a social democrat from Vermont.
We got that in germany. Unbiased Media without bullsh*t. Costs tax money, cause - surprise - someone has to pay. Many germans want to abolish that to save the ~30$/Month. "We get our information on social media". *sigh*
"others lean left (or far-left)" What do you mean lol. There isn't any large scale Left media in the US. Being "pro-Democrat" isn't automatically left. These channels regularly employ ex-GOP people, and still tend to reflect the views of big business, even if to a slightly lesser (and less insane) extent as Fox News.
@@harmreductionman4474 I think we might have a different idea of where the "center" is. Fox is certainly right to far right, but I don't recall any white supremacists talk - some are pretty pro-Trump, but that's about it. I don't watch much of any of them these days since it is mostly OpEd junk. Just get a few tid bits off RUclips and carry on with life.
I love you John Stewart!!! You and John Oliver are the best people in the world along at getting deep into a serious story, creating a narrative, and continuing to provide comedy with it. Thank you
Mueller's investigation was a big nothing burger that Bob himself knew would fail from the start, but he strung it out for the full term of Trump's Presidency to allow the media to cast a negative light on Trump through leaked lies. In the end, the media was left to throw a tantrum for how unfair it is for Trump wanting "to protect his Presidency". So the media is now upset Trump didn't roll over and accept all the lies they made up for years. This is a true narrative, and anyone will be furious if personally subjected to this kind of treatment for years.
Thank you so much...you have in the most enjoyable and smart way possible have so eloquently expressed the frustrations of so many of us...love you Jon...so thankful you are back speaking on issues like only you can...
Thank you for being a great voice of reason amongst the cluster f*** of news reporting in circulation nowadays. You and Russell Brand are tremendously appreciated.
Russel Brand is a guy who wants to be the one to unravel the conspiracy but is just pointing out obvious shit like "maybe the military industrial complex controls shit"
Brand is and always has been an attention seeking moron with little to no wit at all. He, like many others right now, just realized RUclips is where it's at. I was interested when I learned about the stuff he talks on his channel, so I listened into one of his bits, sounded reasonable for a minute or so, so I turned it off and thought nothing of it. Much later I was bored out of my mind and somehow stumbled across one of his other bits. Listening in more than just a few minutes almost made me feel sick. The guy uses the arsenal of people like Stewart, Chappelle and so on, but only to present himself. Nothing he speaks of he provides depth or his own opinion for, because he has none of that. Done no research, has no opinion. The reaction he shows to the things he presents are a dead giveaway, it's Tucker Carlson-level disingenous. No disrespect for that, many more people rely on this sort of clownery to make ends meet these days (and you and at least 80 other people enjoy that sort of thing, so there's a market), but styling himself like a prophet for truth is mildly off-putting, to say the least.
I've always watched a variety of outlets for news knowing that no one place has it all. However, after watching Viva Frei's Live Stream during the Canadian Trucker Rally I will NEVER watch again. What was reported LIVE and what was reported on the NEWS were not the same. This only made the Spin more obvious. Jon Stewart is a shining STAR of wisdom and honesty. So glad you are back!
That's not true. Was the mainstream news lying when they reported that pat king was an organizer and racist who thought white people had the strongest bloodline? Viva only gave on the ground video. He never dug deep into the organizers and people putting the event together.
Jon has inspired a new term which I will use as long as I live: “newsplooge”, the messy, unbecoming and arguably dissatisfying result of an overwrought, histrionic media on any given issue.
Read Reuters...nothing else compares. There isn't zero bias. That's an impossibility. But it's as good as it gets. Most news organizations get their stories from Reuters facts, and build a Dan Brown novel out of it.
Thank you Jon for my biggest laugh of the month. With Bill Barr's ingenious rewriting of the Mueller Report for the mainstream media now revealed, with daily recurrences of anchors and commentators reaching for the Thesaurus to cover a routine arraignment, this is funnier than ever.
Jon... you are like the only newscaster that I'll take the time out of my day to listen to. We need you dude. I'll go gonzo and start kicking people's ass but you sir... are doing a great job.
As much as I feel we alllllll could have used a little bit of John Stewart during the entire five years of the Trump era, I'm beyond thrilled that he's made a return to our lives. Not gonna lie, I was kinda hurt that he left us all to our own devices there for a while. But he's BACK! And that's what really matters!
I agree 100%. The media keeps milking every single situation showing a monumental desperation. They are always priotizing scandals, laziness, superficial perspectives, irrelevance... They suck
It’s like when you wrote a paper in high school and you just rewrote parts of the textbook or something in your own words, without even understanding the meaning of your own words.
Jon you really found your calling. Your leadership gives us a path to the facts and calling out the fake news. Don’t let (want a be journalist for ratings) get away with this stupidity we witness on all media.
Welcome back Jon! Great to see you, hilarious you highlighted the ridiculousness of our media, but also pointed out their 4am talking points being so consistent 😂
😮HE WOULDNT EVER DO THAT!! HE MAKES MORE RIGHT WHERE HES AT!! PRETENDING TO GIVE A SHIT ABOUT ANYTHING OR ANYONE EVER, ASIDE FROM HIS RATINGS AND OVER-INFLATED BANK ACCOUNT!!! YOU ACTUALLY THINK THIS LITERAL COMEDIAN IS A POLITICIAN??😮 THEN YOUR JUST AS DELUSIONAL AS JON IS...IF NOT MORE!!🤔😑 HES NO DIFFERENT THAN ANY OTHER JOURNALIST!! HE TWISTS AND REFRAMES THE ACTUAL NEWS SO TO MAKE IT LEAN IN HIS POLITICAL FAVOR!!! THERES ALWAYS 3-SIDES TO EVERY NEWS STORY!!! AND IF YOU THINK FOR ONE SECOND THAT HE IS ON THE "TRUTH SIDE" THEN YEAH....YOURE A FOOL!!😂
Obama was already president when they attacked him for the tan suit. 🤦🏽♀️ They have too much ammunition against Jon. I would love him to be President 🎉but I'd hate to see what they did to him and his family. 😢
Jon thank you so much for doing this again. I can tell it takes its toll on you. Just look at that face. You make me laugh every time and you can still run circles around very intelligent people who are in positions of power during your interviews. Keep it up man, the world needs this more than ever. Thanks for standing up to hypocrisy
The real Daily Show's still called the Daily Show. Then again, you included a far right con artist like Jordon Peterson on your channel playlist, so I shouldn't be surprised....
@@juststatedtheobvious9633 Wow. You enjoy being a dingus? Agree with Jordan Peterson, or disagree with him... He's smarter than me. And 💯 smarter than you. Thanks for your opinion though.
Part of the problem is how to fund journalism without advertising, corporate donation and profit motives. How to fund journalism without sensationalism and confirmation bias to drive paying viewership. How to fund journalism out of government revenues without bias toward the current party on power. The answer may be the second one, but we need to be education ourselves on the role and value of journalism, what is pure journalism, and be willing to pay $$$ for subscription to it enough to get decent quality without advertising and government aid. So nearly impossible.
How does Google manage to make money? I honestly don't know because everytime I use the service(and it is free) I do not have to pay for it! They are very clever.
@@charleswomack2166 1. They sell your data. What you search for and what sites you visit is marketing data they sell to almost anyone buying. 2. They sell top billing in your searches. When you search for something the first few websites that pop up in your list often paid to get there. 3. They own RUclips, when their link sends you to a RUclips video and you end up watching an ad they get paid for it.
Honest journalists would not pretend that the USA had "The Rule of Law". The problem is pretending that the USA is a country with laws. The media should stop pretending that the USA is better than North Korea. Stop being silly Media!!
This is so brave and right on. I know there is a respect and like between these news casters at MSNBC and John. Yet he states the truth bc he is not tied to corporate media. He knows many of them wish they could resort without worrying about ratings or if ppl like you.
I left teaching after 9 years due to being called a "marxist" and "communist" because I taught Fredrick Douglas in a history class in MARYLAND!!! if you don't know, Douglas was from.......MARYLAND!!!!! absolutely broke my heart to leave the profession I worked so hard to enter. After serving two combat deployments in the Marines I just don't connect with America anymore. Sad.
Now I work in the mental health field.
Thank you for teaching actual history
You worked in a mental health field before, too, pal.
It's amazing, because I studied to teach Social Studies and finding a History Teaching job became so difficult that I gave up and stuck with a different career path. Now, it appears people want to learn less and less about actual history, when it was rather muddy to begin with. People don't want to learn the reality of our past because some of it makes them uncomfortable. But being ignorant to the facts and truth is the complete opposite of how to fix that. When I hear someone on TV or in a movie say something completely historically inaccurate, even minor, I get really annoyed, but when it's serious and extremely ridiculous I get really angry. I also spent most of my life growing up in Maryland after moving up from upstate New York and remember learning all about Slavery and how it really effect our national and state's history. Thanks for spending so much time teaching the truth and facts, and serving in the Marine Corps!
Oh, my. What a sad testament. So sorry!
😂the mental health field?? THATS PERFECT!!😮 PERHAPS YOU CAN COUNCIL THIS HYPOCRITE-CLOWN RIGHT HERE!!😂😂 JON "I PRETEND I CARE, BUT IM ACTUALLY HERE TO PUMP THE RATINGS SO MY BANK ACCOUNT GROWS AND GROWS" STEWART!!!😑👍
The worst thing to happen to the news media is the 24 hour news channels. they've got 24 hours to fill and they cater to their viewers. inciting the masses takes priority over informing the masses.
This is one of the best comments in the history of RUclips. One side of the other you are 100% correct.
Their need to sell advertising compromises the quality of the content
But the free market 😫
It's just like 24-hour sports channels. They have to talk about something, and for everywhere but fox, it's how much Trump sucks, and on Fox it's how much Biden sucks.
A 24 hour news cycle and what's their go-to line whenever an interview shows signs of becoming informative? '....well, that's all the time we have.......' No shit? You have NOTHING BUT TIME!!!!!! They're SO full of shit these klowns, it would take weeks and a decent crowd to kick it out of them.
Props to Jon and his team for putting this up on RUclips so those who don't have Apple TV+ can watch it too.
Indeed, I second that notion very gratefully.
Jon is big enough to be independent
Why sellout to Apple?
@@DaleGribble1 Because Apple paid him a cubic shitload of money, to have it as an exclusive
@@MayfWasHere that makes it sad
@@DaleGribble1 because every show needs sponsors and writers, while this kind of show is also a lot likely to need lawyers.
Having all that in place in a contract and not being personally responsible for everyones paychecks and legal defenses also helps them perform better.
They can always move somewhere else if and when it gets complicated, but some shielding will always be appreciated
This video is now a year old and not only has nothing gotten better, but things are actually getting worse. Thanks Jon!
I'm responding to you 7 months after your response and it's worse NOW, too.
how do you stop racism, stop talking about it - Morgan Freeman
@@loremaster8475 I guess the problem with John Stewart is that he talks about it and nothing stops. Sure, it's funny, but nothing stops.
@@loremaster8475
Precisely. The subconscious part of the human brain cannot distinguish between negatives and positives. If you constantly taking about „Trump is bad“, „Don‘t vote Trump“, the subconsciousness only hears „Trump“.
That‘s why psychology recommends to have your goal be „Have a normal and healthy body“ instead of „Not being fat anymore“. Both are meaning the same, but in the second case, your brain only hears FAT.
In regards to politics it means STOP TALKING ABOUT THE FASCISTS, FOR FUCKS SAKE.
But they won‘t. Because it brings views and clicks and engagement. Jon is guilty too.
Well, when raygun got elected. I SAID THE SAME THING.
I'VE NEVER TRUSTED ALL OF OUR GOVERNMENTS AGENCIES SINCE norman OKRAhoma acknowledged IT WAS A SUNDOWNER TOWN!!
WAKE THE FACT UP IDIOTS!!! WAKE UP TO THE PEOPLES REAL HISTORY!!!!!🙄
The problem with corporate media is that the motivation is to make money, not to properly inform their viewers.
For the record this show is 100% corporate media
@Apollo's Crow free assange, therefor
Related to previous comments it should be pointed out that as a general rule in most of the networks and I would say local stations TV stations radio stations tickly TV stations the news is handled by the entertainment division clear informative news isn't always alone quote entertaining
@@chrismacdonald8049 haha. Yeah. The simulacra trying to convince you they're not simulacra by critiquing simulacra.
@Apollo's Crow no it's not. A corporation exists to acquire money. If you have ethics you get the talk or shown the door. It's that simple. The instant Jon says anything that hurts Apple share price he is gone. There are no ethics under capitalism. In fact the very notion is a form of propaganda.
I'm from the UK. And I can't tell you enough how much I wish we had someone like Jon and how much I admire him. One of the greatest Americans in my mind. He's someone that lights the way.
Im from NJ. and I cant tell you how much we [censored]
I mean the UK somehow has a worse media environment than the US
We do, he's called Ian Hislop and Private Eye magazine.
@@EAfirstlast print media yes, but not television. Even the fox news clones over here are failing.
What's kinda galling is that John Oliver is English, and we lost him to the US. Over here he was a failing comic, over there he's an Emmy award winning journalist whose program runs incredibly well researched segments.
We have Ian Heslop, and Jonathan Pie. They're good, but John and Jon are great, true G.O.A.T's of their trade.
I feel really dumb that I didn’t know Jon had a show that was basically a reboot of his time on The Daily Show. I love it.
Don't feel too bad, I literally just found out 😅
@@Jester2All and he's going right back to the daily show...
John you are spot on I could listen to u for hours. Keep up the fight and the truth. So glad your back
@silencedogood2268 is he really???
@@kittimfhNo, but coincidentally they seem to have hired somebody with the same name who happens to look almost exactly the same. What are the odds?
Jon, please, and I beg you, never ever leave us again. I know you didn't 'leave us', as you have done so much while you were away from hosting a show --- but, to those whose access to your light is limited, it was a dark decade without you.
Jon is very good but you also have to remember Trevor had better not gone where Jon goes. How dare him make those comments. Some but not all people are fools.
I think it was Jon himself who pointed out how the media landscape changed post-9/11, in that every news story became a critical, breaking news headline. The drama of presenting events, particularly events involving war, natural disasters, mechanical mishaps, and political intrigue have distorted our ability to differentiate between what's important, what's not, and what's being underserved. Once the corporate boards of major news networks saw the spike in viewership after the attacks on the WTC and the Pentagon, they knew that their round-the-clock coverage would be able to keep them on the ratings charts, all while crowing about how critical their coverage is to the public.
I'm of the mind that 24/7 news in the age of digital transmission has made for a reactionary news base. I'm of the age that remembers "the evening news" when a familiar anchor would come out and read the day's events in a tone that could put Mr. Rogers to sleep. No embellishment, just the stated facts, and if it was really important, you'd maybe follow up with morning radio or the newspaper the next day, or wait for any updates coming the next evening. But now it's instantaneous. Now you have to be the first to report so that you don't lose viewers or appear to be falling behind. And every story is carried with equal measure and weight, every headline displayed in the same font, all given in the same delivery. It could be a hurricane landing on the Atlantic coast, or a plane that went down over Iowa, or a statue being removed from it's plinth, or an organized protest taking place in Brazil - all these stories are brought to the public as being critical to note.
Look at what's happening now with the war in Ukraine - hardly anything domestic gets spoken about with the same intensity or prevalency. It IS important, but this hourly update routine is exhausting, because they're turning a travesty of geopolitical warfare into a spectator sport. In the same way that I listen to sports analysts going over the details of trade rumors, or game predictions, or player injuries, news anchors and the pundits they hire to come give "expert insight" are essentially doing the same thing - trying to second guess what's about to happen, or even more egregiously, declaring a victory before one has yet to surface. It's not the way people need to get informed. It's watered down entertainment for political junkies and partisans.
I agree, let’s further this conversation.
When the news merged into entertainment.
News shouldn’t be confused with entertainment media.
24 hrs news cycle are overwhelming and desensitize the viewer to the urgency of the topic being spoken about.
If fast food doesn’t kill us, media overload just might!
Actually, that happened with the advent of CNN, not 911. That was going on LONG before. The fact is that the news was ALWAYS biased and was never 'news', it was what three or four corporations wanted you to think. That hasn't changed.
Just now in 'the economist' their headline is how 'humanitys fate is hanging on ukraine'. Thats odd that they didn't think that when Iraqis or Afghans were dying. Compare the news from Ukraine with how Iraq was reported. Hell, in Iraq they wouldn't even show soldiers coffins returning from Iraq.
THAT hasn't changed from, well, EVER. Analysis of reporting from the seventies on Vietnam and Indonesia, where the US was providing arms showed just how biased the media is. And it shouldn't be a suprise, news from an empire will of course favour the empire. Romans didn't hear news critical of the Roman empire but about all the horrible things the savages did.
THat of course should not be taken as any kind of comment that lets Russia off the hook for the invasion, I think the attention it gets is how it SHOULD be handled. But Iraq and Afghanistan and places where the US illegally invaded should be discussed in much the same way. To be fair, like Russia, at the time there were the largest protests ever recorded AGAINST the war. It didn't stop the war, but when governments are clearly going against the wishes of their own people should be something the media focuses on, but of course isn't going to.
Oh this goes back to fucking OJ and the Clarance Thomas hearings.
Man you hit the nail on the head.
On the flipside I'm 30. I grew up in the wake of 9/11 so this is all I've ever really known. I'm so appreciative of Jon Stewart for telling me that this isn't normal or healthy as I was growing up.
And I think with my age group just generally speaking avoid CNN, Fox, etc. That's not inherently a good thing either, as getting your info from random posters on Twitter or 4chan isn't exactly better.
It's just so frustrating and I've such a hatred for the media corporations. They created this nightmare environment where I feel like I've to take everything with boulders of salt in relentless pursuit of profit.
And with photoshop technology and now deep fakes becoming more advanced and cheaper by the second, I already know I can't trust my own eyes unless I'm seeing something firsthand.
It's completely maddening.
I am so happy you are back with a show, Jon Stewart. We missed you so much.
The Democrat Party Inconvenient Truth: The 2020 US Presidential election was stolen. The 2016 US Presidential election was almost stolen. In 2016 Bill " Slick Willie" Clinton was the con man. Donald Trump was a Republican "plant" recruited by Bill Clinton to help Hillary Clinton win the 2016 US Presidential election. The Clinton election theft plan backfired because Donald Trump couldn't stay ahead of Hillary Clinton's continuous damaging Wikileaks. Part One: Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and Donnna Brazile all publicly claimed that the Clintons rigged the 2016 Democrat Party nomination. Wikileaks proved this. Part Two: New York Times reporter Amy Chozick wrote in her book "Chasing Hilary" that in 2014 Bill "Slick Willie" Clinton "casually encouraged" Donald Trump to run for President in 2016. Why would Bill "Slick Willie" Clinton do that? Part Three: May of 2015, one month after Hillary Clinton declared her candidacy for President in 2016 as a Democrat, Bill "Slick Willie" Clinton called Donald Trump and they talked about Presidential politics. Three weeks later Donald Trump announced his candidacy for President in 2016 as a Republican. The Washington Post covered this story. Now you know the truth!
The Democrats tried to steal the 2016 US Presidential election but failed. They succeeded in 2020, however. But at a future cost.
@@rockyzrockyx917 Trump!!!!
@@johnbartlett9568 1. Wikileaks. 2. The New York Times. 3. The Washington Post. All valid sources prove the Clinton Democrats tried to steal the 2016 US Presidential election by first rigging the 2016 DNC Presidential nomination and then recruiting Donald Trump to run as a Republican "plant". The Clintons first rigged the 2016 Democrat Primary. Democrats Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and Donna Brazile all claim this based on Wikileaks. Bill "Slick Willie" Clinton then contacted Donald Trump TWICE about running for President in 2016 as a Republican. The Clinton Democrats 2016 US Presidential election theft attempt backfired because Donald Trump couldn't stay ahead of Hillary Clinton's damaging Wikileaks.
@@rockyzrockyx917 nope… everything you sourced was wrong too… are you sure you didnt get this from some dark far right corner of the internet
@@pm.meowth4850 WRONG! Please explain 2016. Democrats Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and Donna Brazile all publicly claim that the Clintons stole the 2016 Democrat Primary nomination. They made their accusations based on Wikileaks releases. Please also explain why in 2014 Bill "Slick Willie" Clinton "casually suggested" to Donald Trump that Trump should run for President in 2016. New York Times reporter Amy Chozik wrote this in her book "Chasing Hillary". In May 2015 - one month after Hillary Clinton announced her 2016 Presidential candidacy as a Democrat - the Washington Post reported that Bill "Slick Willie" Clinton called Donald Trump and talked Presidential politics. Bill "Slick Willie" Clinton told Donald Trump that Donald Trump should "play a larger role in the Republican Party" and to "focus on GOP base voters." Less than three weeks later Donald Trump announced his 2016 Presidential candidacy as a Republican. Bill Clinton TWICE suggested to Donald Trump that Trump should run for President. Why dould Bill Clinton do that? The Clinton Democrats tried to steal the 2016 US Presidential election but failed. Donald Trump couldn't stay ahead of Hillary Clinton's continuous Wikileaks. Extrapolate 2016 to 2020!
"If Truth were introduced into American society, the whole system would collapse" - George Carlin.
The truth is that Trump and his inner circle had many connections to shady rich Russians and pro-russian Ukrainians. It's a fact no matter if the media blew it.
And I say it would occur within a 24 hour period. But at the same time, lies and invented fantasy led to the criminal nonsense in January of last year. We do not need "truth" as much as the nation needs to obtain a minimum basic education.
Educated minds can handle truth. It is and always has been intentional ignorance which is the problem.
I miss Carlin RIP! Could you imagine Jon and George on the same screen at the same time ?
One system collapses, another rises.
@@DanT10 - there is a video of Jon interviewing Carlin on RUclips
I would go insane without you John Stewart, I am so glad you are and care and do and …,,
More to come
Jon's at his best when he's skewering cable news media. This was vintage Daily Show. I'm a huge, huge fan of Jon's, this is just the best content I've seen out of him since he retired from TDS
I love that he is free of many leashes cable tv had him tied to. He can now say cum to his heart's content. lol
Although, his colorful ways of describing "bad" words on Comedy Central were themselves rather funny.
agreed on all fronts, jon has many talents and this is his best
This is a backhanded compliment. You're almost calling him a one-trick pony (which he is not).
Wait, so the one bit he does on so called "liberal" (really NEOliberal) corporate news is his best work?
Dude, this is merely a regurgitation of all the stuff he did on TDS - and his peak TDS work was better than this.
His work on Collateralizd Debt Obligations was his AMAZING. It was so good, my economics professor used it to explain CDOs and Credit Default Swaps in college.
This is just recycling his old "corporate media cares about profits not truth" thesis on TDS (and he's 100% correct). It's great, dont get me wrong, but this isn't really a compliment the way you meant it.
He's done far better material than this imo, both since his return and TDS. This was a repetition of so many of his stellar media critiques on TDS with more current material.
His work on the stock market and on climate change was better. This is shit we already knew from his incredible work on TDS.
He's the one that got Crossfire cancelled, remember?
@@seanphurley I'll repeat what I told the original poster. This is a backhanded compliment. You're almost calling him a one-trick pony (which he is not).
Wait, so the one bit he does on so called "liberal" (really NEOliberal) corporate news is his best work?
Dude, this is merely a regurgitation of all the stuff he did on TDS - and his peak TDS work was better than this.
His work on Collateralizd Debt Obligations was his AMAZING. It was so good, my economics professor used it to explain CDOs and Credit Default Swaps in college.
This is just recycling his old "corporate media cares about profits not truth" thesis on TDS (and he's 100% correct). It's great, dont get me wrong, but this isn't really a compliment the way you meant it.
He's done far better material than this imo, both since his return and TDS. This was a repetition of so many of his stellar media critiques on TDS with more current material.
His work on the stock market and on climate change was better. This is shit we already knew from his incredible work on TDS.
He's the one that got Crossfire cancelled, remember?
@@feynmanschwingere_mc2270 what are you even fighting about my man.
read the post--"jon has many talents" is not "one trick pony". you are right this is a regurgination of TDS, which is why aprove of it. He has better material than this, but it is of him doing commentary on media.
His work on stock market and climate change was nowhere near as good imo.
Jon literally parodied my anger with media to perfection. Thanks, Jon! I'm glad you're back.
Ditto...I'm wondering if that Fox piece with "Democracy dies in darkness"
was a double entendre??
@jessebadry, please educate yourself about CRT. It has not ever been a part of public school curriculum. The Republicans made up their own definition and manufactured an issue out of the letters and used it to scare and manipulate their base...and it worked!
@@corriecarney6101 Truth!
. ong - etc
@@NullParadigm You know (maybe you don't) that every school that teaches CRT still teaches it, it's a college course.
Yes Jon, they do believe we are stupid. And unfortunately that does seem to be the case for a lot of people.
I had no clue he was doing this again. Thank you so much Jon and others like you for doing what needs to be done and bringing the truth to light for us. Selfish as hell, but I needed this in my life right now. Thank you again.
You are not selfish. This is a precious oxygen we need right now in the midst of clowns running our country right now and the media that fuels it.
Sadly, Apple TV didn’t renew the show after the last season. 😢
@@janechora1905well now he’s back on TDS once a week lfggg
I am 100% grateful for Jon Stewart. He IS still trusted FAR MORE than ANY news channel or anchor.. it OUGHT to be embarrassing for Journalists that a comedian does their job better than they do… REGARDLESS of the channel or anchor.. ALL OF THEM pale by comparison. None hold a candle to his trustworthiness as one who fully delivers the news in a way that INFORMS his audience as well as providing solid humor as well. We are given FACTUAL, RESOURCED NEWS from Stewart. Who else actually does that without worrying about their ratings as well as knowledge of stories?
Counterpoint: he's jewish
Jon doesn't give you the news. He feeds you your cognitive bias with a spoon.
@@holdenmcgroin3995 your counterpoint is irrelevant and pointless.
@@holdenmcgroin3995 Go listen to your Reverend Alex Jones and watch out for that Jewish Space laser coming down on you lololol. Troll.
Preach Friend 😊😊😊
"If you don't read the newspapers, you are uninformed. If you read the newspapers, you are misinformed." Mark Twain
That was also Denzel
@@bighock2886 😂
@@ichijofestival2576 "Anyone can just make up a quote on the internet."
- George Washington
@@ichijofestival2576 "That Ichijo Festival, they really know what's up" - Albert Einstein
@@SomeRUclipsTraveler "Quoting people from history increases your intelligence by 50%.." ~Einstein
Jon is a national treasure, I am so glad he is back, especially in this uncensored, longer format. Bless you Mr Stewart.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^5555555555555
I love Jon Stewart! Maybe he should run for president in 2024…
he should be kept in fort knox and fed bananas
It's very comforting to see Jon at his desk, scribbling on blue paper 😊
Not so much for the state of the media... but I'll take what I can get.
This feels like the real return of Jon Stewart 👍🏼
You poke the bear long enough, he comes out of hibernation.
I'm 14 all over again. Stealing pot from my mom and watching the daily show.
I do miss his perspective.
Looks like a White Paul Mooney to me 😂😂😂
Jon Stewart is woke. No this isn’t the return of Stewart. Cherry picking clips and editing them was always what Jon Stewart did but to pretend he’s some kind of moral high ground. It’s Orange Man Bad Stewart
I like when the news starts a story then they say they have an expert. They show the expert, who coincidentally just wrote a book about this. They plug the book and are asked a simple question that goes on for too long. Then then the shot pulls out and there is a panel of like 10 people talking over each other for the next 5 minutes.
At the end, one is left trying to figure out the answers, the way I see it, the coming generations are gonna want short vids like on Tiktok, I make fun of my daughter because she'll spend hours watching 30 sec vids, I wouldn't be surprised if news media moves to Tiktok and the such if they haven't already.
@@RoninMike-DR It appears that they have already.
He’s back! There are 30 clones out there who try to fill his shoes, and not one can hold a candle to him! Thank god he’s back. Much much needed.
Trevor Noah was such a weak replacement by comparison.
Tbh, I like Trevor Noah, he's equally hilarious and brings his own unique insights to these issues...
That being said, Jon Stewart is a freaking LEGEND! SOOOOOO glad to see him back doing what he does best, skewering the MSM and cracking us all up in the process! 😅😂🤣 Trevor Noah had to start back from Square 1 to get anywhere close to this good, Jon Stewart is a freaking PRO...🥰♥️😍😅😂🤣
@@jesserogalski1402 Nope, trevor is just as good as jon. both are amazing, but given the fact i started watching the show when it was trevor, i am biased towards trevor.
each of those whom you call 'clone' are great and amazing and are trying to put a spin on it themselves
Since CNN traded in its reporters and support staff for news personalities it is only capable of handling about 3 news stories a day. If it finds one its audience is drawn to it will ride that horse mercilessly as long as it can walk and will continue to beat it after it stumbles and dies.
I honestly believe that if the media companies hired LESS people at ridiculously high wages for personalities, and focused on simple shoe-leather reporting, they would actually make more money because people would begin to trust them and actually watch.
If a scorpion didn't sting, it wouldn't be a scorpion.
Do you really belive most people want to be informed more than entertained?
Those people are harder to sell random crap to tho
@@infernalstan886 Do you really believe the first objective of media is to make money from the media itself?
Thought this would be a Stewart Fox News bash when it started, but thankfully, he held the best for the second half - the evisoration of the left leaning media and the Ruasian Hoax. The Original Big Lie. Brought to you by the Clinton Campaign and James Comey. NewsCum - perfect!
I’m a visual artist (painter) and my works are mostly satirical and Jon is one of the individuals that’s influenced that the most. Up there with Voltaire. He’s a satirical savant
I'd say he's a typical jew
@@PoqanicsThen if that’s what a “typical jew” is, then hell yea. I don’t need a hitler like you to tell me what to think
@@PoqanicsNo issue with that. Doesn’t make him any less great
Part of the problem is the 24Hr news cycle. It leaves you having to spin events into news. Sort of like a high school essay with a word count threshold. At some point you start attaching an adjective next to every noun you can find to meet the prescribed word count.😂
They never cover some of the things they should, though. They could cover labor issues. They don't cover a lot of the mass shootings. They don't cover environmental issues (like dumping) very often. They almost never cover corruption. They don't like to cover science-related topics in general. Jon was calling out all of the fluff pieces they do instead.
@@ryanburchett8455 True. But substantive reporting of that sort requires time and money. Weeks worth of investigating vs. tracking Florida man fleeing from the cops on the highway
Rain in the Midwest is now, "A Killer Storm!" Ammirite?
@@Redmenace96 If true
I once saw a channel that just showed random events all day. Sadly forgot what it was called. Just footage of bridges collapsing, strikes, demonstrations, war footage.
There is more than enough stuff happening in the world for a 24h news cycle. But modern media always wants a 'narrative'.
If their anchors cannot get some kind of 'story' from an event - no mater how big it may be - then you're most likely not going to see it.
Just compare the Ukrainian war coverage with the Yemen war coverage. the first can be beautifully spun as a story of heroes. My local paper as it's own segment "What happened this night in the war' EVERY SINGLE morning. I think I have not read more than 10 articles about Yemen in the last 5 years.
Thank you for returning Jon. You guided me as a tween and you’re still making the most sense now that I’m in my thirties
How dumb you have to be if Jon Stewart a comedian with no substance or humour can guide you ..
If you really like John Stewart, I suggest watching Last Week Tonight and Some More News. They're also great at looking into serious issues.
@@AUG_XZABER John Oliver's delivery is rancid, though. Even if he may have interesting things to talk about, whenever he tries to make things funny, he acts like a completely pompous, over-the-top clown.
I guess I'm spoiled rotten by Jon's calm, unaccented (I'm sorry, but a British accent does give someone an air of better-than-thou) demeanor and delivery, but...part of being an informative comedian is being able to address the absurdity of it all without looking like you're trying too hard.
And John Oliver *definitely* comes off as trying *far* too hard.
@@Ilyak1986 I disagree. I think Oliver just has a different form of comedy. It's different but not bad.
I salute you Mr.Crabtree
Jon Stewart for President. Write him in for 2024. Forget those other 2. We can do this. Let's take it viral!!!
Jon Stewart is the hero this country needs.
Stewart , been watching you since early daily show. Love the ability to make us laugh at our own destruction, while simultaneously motivating us to do something about it, even if it’s just to take accountability for the media we watch and the way we inform ourselves.
12:50 So what am I suppose to do? Should I just use violence?
Great segment. The news coverage in the USA needs a MAJOR overhaul. I live in Germany now and the news over here is so refreshing. The problem with these networks in the USA is they need to pump every small thing up to 10 to keep viewers locked in so they over sensationalize EVERYTHING. there is not enough actual engaging news to keep a network on 24/7 with interesting topics. I really appreciate that you didn't just go after Fox news for 20 minutes. You were even handed and gave a slap in the face to nearly every network.
But it’s right wing media that is spreading lies, hate and propaganda for political gain
@@alucard1116 no argument there. There is a little bit of "both sides" here to go around as far as the media in general, but the right is far far worse literally spreading false information to stoke the fires of hatred. Totally agree.
@@jacobseal It’s why I get frustrated with just blanket statements. We can deal with the kind of limp wristed journalism in the US after we solve the larger problem of literal propagandists succeeding at turning millions of Americans against democracy. That is my big concern today.
@@alucard1116 see Kyle Rittenhouse for proof both sides can lie through their teeth.
@@alexandrelavergne7961 What specific lie are you referring to?
And let’s be clear everyone lies. The issue is what certain people and organization lie about that is the issue. But you knew that already right? It’s not like you would pretend jaywalking and murder were equivalent crimes right?
I remember when journalists reported the news rather than speculating on what the news might be. It feels like maybe 10% of the news is actually reporting, the rest is just ridiculous speculation.
The press has always pushed narratives dating back to the papers printed in the original 13 colonies.
They don't have many reporters left to do actual investigations themselves. They pull off the wire the work of other people and the stories hand fed to them by their "news source" (governmentaly sterilized rendition of the events) Then they chop it up and mold it to their narrative. They can then sensationalize it and manipulate the viewers into the fear driven ratings system that gets them corporate profits. All the while creating a massive divide in the country that will one day lead to conflicts between neighbors, if not an all out civil war of ideology. Welcome to the Rush Limbaugh model of modern journalism. (I give him credit since he is the one I remember from my earliest inquiries into politics back in the 90's. Maybe he didn't start it but to me he is the culprit in this model. There were other right wing radio talk show hosts doing this, but he was by far the most popular at the time)
Nowadays they speculate and sensationalise to chase ratings. On both sides, they also appeal to bias, so they are not really journalists anymore. There are a few good investigative journalists out there but they write books and intellectual columns based on evidence. Most people don’t read anything of value any more.
No. It's 5% news, and 95% talking heads telling you how you should feel about the news.
In other words, US news is propaganda, and nothing but.
Or another news segment: "we read a company's press release and don't evaluate it or critique in any way." Literal free advertising
Jon is THE ONLY journalist calling out politicians and “journalists” on their BS. He explains why they’re wrong in simple, understandable ways so that even a child can understand.
We need more Jon Stewart’s and journalists who refuse to play the “access” game. In other words, journalists must make politicians (both Democrats as well as Republicans) afraid of their election(s).
Good! Now all we need is the orcas to walk on land!
@@kittyonmydesk5532 I held a meeting with two and they confirmed that a restaurant is being constructed so that they’ll eat the rich! I’ll give you my review next Tuesday 😋😍
Never mentioned the reason being ratings, not once. Guess that is a given. Yet MAGA just knows it all so they have no need to learn anymore.
Jon isn't a journalist, bro. He's a comedian and a talk show host......
@@HarloffGoes2GalaxysEdge Close enough and a fair better entertainer to actually make something so serious humorous. God bless this guy... he needs all the power he can get. i means Jesus bless this guy. Not a common saying for some reason... he says knowingly.
I am SO glad that Jon is back. We missed you!
Yes give Jon a live audience and a news monologue for a part of his new internet show. It is great to have his voice back
I'm not even on the Left and I like Jon Stewart. There's a huge market for people who tell you what they really think. I don't care if you disagree with me, just be honest.
@@paulweeldreyer7457 Exactly!
I've watched this so. many. times. So damn funny, so sad, so pathetic, so brilliant, Jon. A beautiful summation of our failing nation.
Chuckling into the trauma filled tsunami of news .
I don't totally understand it. Is he saying that our media overly covers things to the point that you can't take anything seriously?
8OO813S
@@asrexproductions exactly
@@PravinDahal wrote a Bible, started with Jon Stewart and ended with China?? Bro stop being so stupid
You are THE BEST. As a Canadian…. I know that there is at least ONE sane person in the American News Industry. Thank you.
It's just so amazing having Jon Stewart back
I just logged back in to leave a comment and I was literally going to write the same thing.
Thanks be for goodness sake Stu Beef is back!
I never saw his back during the whole episode. It's his front I was watching.
It's also nice to see he still rules, I was really scared of another Colbert situation
I can't handle the canned laugh tracks. It's really cringeworthy.
Like an 80's sitcom.
He does not need the Pavlov bells.
He's been back. Been doing this show for several months. Where were you then?
So glad he went on breaking points for an interview, even reached out to them.
@David WilliamsonI loved their interview. You could tell Jon isn't used to being challenged from the left or a populist standpoint. I'm not bashing him for it, it helps sharpen his thoughts and ideas. You can tell he's used to destroying liberal and conservative hacks, and that's great. The important part is he isn't afraid to be challenged. He's an honest actor willing to discuss things instead throwing punches immediately like a contradictory view is a call to arms.
What is Breaking Points?
@David Williamson Thanks!
Imagine if the media actually worked to investigate and debunk the claims made by other media rather than just being lazy and ignoring it?
That would require a company to spend money on something with no quantitative benefit to them, so of course they would never ever do that
@Mickey_ValentineIt doesn't really... it was just a platform for leaks like the name implies. In that sense it's crowdsourced without quantitative benefit but they wouldn't publish an investigation about claims by other media.
One of the problems is that there is never enough real "news" to fill 24 hours. There isn't enough local news to even fill 30 minutes, usually. This is even true with internet - shows (whether its RUclips or TikTok or Facebook or whatever) have to fill time with something. But that doesn't mean a person has to watch all that crap. It really is up to the viewer to be discerning and not fill their minds with trash, just like you shouldn't load up at Burger King every day for every meal, or even eat steak or expensive desserts for every single meal.
There definitely is, that’s why you can have international/weather/sports sections. To fill in the gaps with information that may be seemingly unnecessary to disseminate on a grand scale, but a few members of the audience will appreciate.
@@caoldavies1740 There definitely isn't.
Try listening to the BBC weather reports early in the morning . Fascinating & educational.
Imagine if the news media actually took it upon themselves to report on issues in depth and actually discuss the nuances and complexity that controversies can have. Then again, the public doesn’t want to pay or watch that sort of thing, so I guess we are screwed
For better or for worse, a _lot_ of people are slowly moving away from watching TV-style news towards other sources. It's definitely a mixed bag because while some people will spend more time actually looking into the data on a given issues and put more time and thought into their positions, it's very easy for people who don't know any better to get swept up into the alt-right very quickly, and once you're in it can be very difficult to escape.
You get the "news media" you pay for. Thanks, millennials and Gen Zers!
@@ChicagoRic360 gen z literaly just started consuming the news we have now, if anything this is the fault of the boomers for making 24/7 news cycle normalized.
@@ChicagoRic360 A lot earlier that that. I'm 70 and I remember. ABC / NBC / CBS wanted to ELIMINATE news coverage in the '60s. The FCC licensed the public airways to them and told them they had a responsibility to report news to the public.
OK.
But they cut nightly news from a full hour to half an hour, and sought ratings by adding fluff. That still didn't make a profit but it reduced their loss. Oh, and talked Walter Conkrite into early retirement.
Main stream media is controlled by the *rich*.
I highly recommend watching the RUclips videos:
_"Can You Trust the Media? | Manufacturing Consent Explained"_
_"Capitalism And Monopolies: How Five Companies Control All US Media"_
Nice to see Jon doing his greatest hits, no one can deconstruct the media like he can, the bit with the Muller report was outstanding, my sides hurt now ouch !
You're never going to contribute to anything meaningful. This is just another show to you. Your country is falling apart.
You probably got bomb shell fragments on your side and need medical help
He sure played his part in helping the same MSM try to take out Trump.
@@rotorheadv8 Trump needed to be taken out. Luckily, the voters did it
Yes . ! . ! . .
Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert reported the news more accurately and fairly for years as comedians and it still reigns true for Stewart
All of them including John Oliver, Seth Meyers, Trevor Noah did so!
Colbert before mainstream, I guess...
@@RickJasonObrero11 Please don’t tell me you’re one of those who fell for Colbert’s character 😂
Dw bcs I also miss the days before he left for CBS. His character was legendary
No, he means before Colbert sold out to Blue MAGA and Genocide Joe
Oh John... Why did you leave us? I'm so glad you're back 😌
Mr Stewart- Bless you and thank you for serving satiating nurishment in a cafeteria of empty calories. 🍽 Thank you for sharing your show on YT. You and your team are doing God’s work, sir. ✊ No one does it like you. 🐐🙏🏼
So glad you're back. I just realized you have a show again. You kept me sane during the Bush years and your current events inspired comedy is oddly comforting despite the topics you cover.
Didn't help you much during the Obama years, in which Obama went on to bomb Pakistan, Libya, Syria, Somalia, and Yemen. Obama was as much of a liar as George W. Bush was, and Bush was a tremendous liar. If you think the US bombed Syria because "Assad is gassing his own people" or that he bombed Libya "to prevent a humanitarian crisis" - it's because people like Jon Stewart are really partisan hacks, and they will only tell you the truth when the Republican leadership is lying, not when the Democratic leadership is lying.
It’s comforting when you know you’re not being deceived like the mainstream media always is attempting to do.
It’s comforting because Jon is someone we can trust. Unlike the talking heads on MSM!
@@anderseckstrand7033 You think you can trust Jon Stewart?
Obama started bombing 5 new nations, and lied to start two wars.
Do you know what the lies were? Can you name those 5 nations?
I respected Stewart when he CORRECTLY called out the Bush administration for lying us into the Iraq War. Stewart didn't bother to do that with Obama when his administration lied us into the Syrian and Libyan war.
He didn't say anything when our propaganda said "Ukraine had a revolution" - they didn't, it was a CIA coup. We know this with ABSOLUTE certainty because Victoria Nuland was recorded choosing the next "leader" of Ukraine - 3 weeks before the "Maidan revolution".
Stewart is just a partisan hack. All his fake sincerity about having open discussion and talking truth to power is a facade. He's a nothing more than a shill for the democratic party no matter what crime they do. He'll criticize the republicans when they commit crimes (and he should), but never the democrats, ever.
This man isn't respectable. He's a sellout just like Colbert is.
@@anderseckstrand7033 Except for the fact that he mainly parrots the EXACT same talking points as the Corporate Media, much of the time.
@@anderseckstrand7033 Can't tell if sarcasm..
As someone who grew up watching John on The Daily Show, I am SO happy he's back. He's my happy place.
Uh ... Joe Rogan has more viewers per show than ALL of main stream media combined!!! How do you explain that Jon?
@Pot Kettle ... dealing with the hard facts helps with sadness. (true sadness issues come from avoiding reality ... exhibit A = laughing Pot Kettle)
@Pot Kettle ... thanks to you ..........
could clarify what your happy place means? thx
Such an important message to the media which I fear will be ignored by the people that need to absorb it most - I'm so sick and tired of the media beating everything up, it's so draining, disheartening, and numbing - no wonder it's difficult to keep electorates engaged on important issues. Endless cycles of nauseatingly recycled conjecture, "expert" opinion, lies, propaganda, fear, outrage and anticipation-peddling often just built on bs or nothing new or of substance.
Jon sums up why people don’t trust the media and how certain media outlets push their own political narratives, even if unfounded in facts. Well done, Jon.
Except he doesn't do it for the liberal media just FOX.🙄
@@web-angel
How can the media be liberal if Fox News is part of the mainstream media?
@@web-angel
Jon Stewart criticized CNN and MSNBC all the time, especially in 2011, when Nancy Pelosi stated that she would not answer any questions about Anthony Weiner and then the news media left that press conference.
did he make the connection to those that sponsor those news programs though?
@@giantsr1eva "All the time! Especially 12 YEARS AGO" LMAO he does NOT do it anymore or not nearly enough. We can see this plain as day.
And THIS is why I love Jon Stewart. I've so missed his voice and so happy he is back! 😊
Oh Jon, how I've missed you!!! We have needed you back for a while and I couldn't be happier to watch your show.
you got something on your nose.
Jon, i lost track of you over the years after daily show. But after the recent Guardian article about leaving apple tv i thought id look you up here hoping you were broadcasting here. It is such a treat to see you are and i hope your subscribers go through the roof. Great to see you again. Looking forward to listening to sanity again..
Jon Stewart, you are the greatest thing that came to 21st century America. Can this approach to commentary succeed? I don't think nuance is something we can hope for from Tucker Carlson. But it should work to get reasonable people to see the truth. I'm too cheap to buy Apple TV+. I really appreciate being able to watch it here. Thank you so much.
stop the self restraint, dont hold back
So good to see John Stewart back to shuffling papers and making funny faces. If that's not world class entertainment then I don't know what is.
It's, "Jon". Also, are you trying to take a shot? If so, fail.
His papers are nothing but scribbles.
13:56
I'm smoking pot and having flashbacks of smoking pot when I was 14 watching the daily show.
Sort of like FOX but he's intentionally trying to funny lol.
Doesn't that kind of make Jon also a part of the problem. Our need to make everything that should be informative into entertainment is what he's talking about and here we are.
I'm a right of centre conservative and I love Jon Stewart, he keeps it real and exposes the tools on both sides. He also makes me laugh a lot.
It’s not about right and left anymore there’s only up and down lol
Nice Calico Jack.
wow you’re such a rebel!
So you're wrong, just not a complete psychopath yet. Gotcha.
Ditto
John Stewart is the best of We The People.
I'm so glad Jon Stewart is giving this issue a platform. Most people will call you a conspiracy theorist talking about stuff like this, but now this might actually go mainstream
Just like MSM, it depends on how you present it. If you present it like Mike Pillow, then you'll be dismissed as a loon, but if it is objective without filling it up with noise, then you sound a bit more credible. Qanon had a bad reputation when everything they said was strictly partisan and niche to Democratic Hollywood Elites, but after finding out and defending Trump's image with Epstein, they sort of dissolved. The amount of energy they put in to uncovering Democrats, if that was applied universally and cogently, then a lot more people would've taken it seriously and not dismiss it like they do with MTG space lasers or existence. A person who is worse than MTG is Tulsi Gabbard who is smart and was liked by independents, Democrats, and Republicans. How she carries and tones things makes people listen; even if it is dangerous or misleading.
Yeah most of those people are in his audience lol
@@ballzfortwo Most conspiracy theories end up being true
@BAWSE STATUS ... really? Most of them do?
Everything that was true since Trump decided to run according to msm has been false and everything that was considered conspiracy has been truth. Biden is in the White House because real journalism was banned before the election…..see Hunter Biden’s laptop. If all the msm reported on that as the truth it is, does anyone really think Joe would have had a chance? Thinking our country would be in a much better situation than it is now if it weren’t for our lying state media….
This is why I hate mainstream media, I couldn't put it myself into words, but Jon just did. Thank you very much.
"The walls are closing in on Trump" is a sentence I don't ever want to hear again! Jon hits it out of the park again.
Jon is the MSM. He's just trying to catch up to the populist wave that passed by 5 years ago.
My opinion is media is responsible for half of the polarization in the country.
Nice to see the problem with Jon Stewart on apple tv+ finally calling out the corporate media
Bingo
On the one hand, lol.
On the other, locate a single source of insight or information worth a goddamn that isn't hosted on a massive corporate platform.
Please, go ahead.
Yeah! How dare he exist in this flawed world! lol I get where you're coming from but at a certain point it's physically impossible not to be a bit of a hypocrite and still function. Own a cellphone = Hypocrite. Buy suspiciously cheap clothing= hypocrite. Buy anything from Nestle= hypocrite. Buy anything made in Russia now and probably soon China= hypocrite. Etc. ad infinitum.
Thinking about it for too long makes me want to go live in the woods and grow my own food... Which would end badly lol. 🤣
@@mayaenglish5424 you know he could have started a RUclips channel, while he would still be on a massive corporate platform, he would still be more or less independent, but he didn't do that because apple TV paid him
@@quatreraberbawinner2628 That's just not realistic, First of all, the dude has bills to pay too. The daily show didn't make THAT much money lol. Also, Do you want an actual tv show with a staff of writers and camera operators and lighting and interviews with important people? Because you don't get any of that with Jon Stewart sitting in his room by himself with a crappy camera/audio set up that he doesn't know how to use because he's old (Sorry Jon, but I've watched you use zoom during the pandemic) and only booking people that he personally can get a hold of (Which might be a lot based off of who he is but certainly not as much as he can get with a professional set up.)
I'll always remember "Summer of the Shark" where you couldn't turn on the news without hearing about shark attacks. It started with one dramatic incident that captured people's attention, but then the media glommed onto it. They reported every time someone just saw a shark, and over-hyped everything. Really played into people's fears and made it seem like shark attacks were on the rise, when in reality there were fewer shark attacks that year than average. Stuff like that is why I didn't take COVID seriously at first, until I actually read what doctors were saying. Over-hyped banalities from the news media is so dangerous, but at the same time I feel like it's so difficult to discuss it with nuance because you'll always get the damned conspiracy theorists and the far right folk saying, "see we told you libtard new media lies". Sigh.
So don't lie. Report the facts.
Nobody can do it the way Jon Stewart does. Obsessed with him.
you are making his wife get red ears
Jeff Daniel's character in "The Newsroom" put it perfectly when he said that, when the CRTC mandated that all networks must provide one hour of news per day, they should have said it has to be commercial free.
How we have missed this man! And how badly he is needed ! THANK YOU! You answered the call!
Love you John! You provide the smile on my face! So nice to have you back!😁
I love Jon Stewart so much. This is amazing to see him back at what he does best. He is the hero we need right now.
Mr. Stewart, I've been a big fan for years. The work you've done for Vets with respiratory problems.. Thank you. Thank you so much.
Good one. When watching the news, watch out for the words "could, should, might". When you hear those words, you are no longer watching news. You are being lead down a rabbit hole.
John, there are no words to express our gratitude for speaking the truth.
Preserve this man at all costs.
Part of the problem is the abundance of 24/7 "news" channels that are in constant need for new information and content all the freaking time. When was the last time something wasn't "breaking news?" Each agency has their own demographic, which they need to reinforce their audience (thought bubble) - which is why Fox is right-wing and the others lean left (or far-left). You know what might be neat - a source of unbiased, un-editorialized news - it would last perhaps 30 minutes each day (reporting just the facts doesn't take that long) - then we could opt-in to editorialized content if we desire or have absolutely nothing better to do.
Watching a lot of those clips when they got to the "if true" part - I noticed many of them had an undeniable smile and excitement that Trump could be going to jail - if true.
I'm a journalist full-time. You're 99% right, but I'd be very hesitant to say there's any far-left cable news network in the U.S. Even MSNBC was largely skeptical of Bernie Sanders, with Chris Matthews comparing his primary victories to the Nazis conquering France and going on a rant about how "if the reds had won the cold war I would have been executed in Time Square" when people criticized him for it. There is no mainstream news network in the United States with a communist or even socialist orientation. Unfortunately our political spectrum is completely imbalanced and that's why you see Fox News expounding openly white supremacist rhetoric whereas even our "far left" networks are spooked by a social democrat from Vermont.
We got that in germany. Unbiased Media without bullsh*t. Costs tax money, cause - surprise - someone has to pay. Many germans want to abolish that to save the ~30$/Month. "We get our information on social media". *sigh*
"others lean left (or far-left)" What do you mean lol. There isn't any large scale Left media in the US. Being "pro-Democrat" isn't automatically left. These channels regularly employ ex-GOP people, and still tend to reflect the views of big business, even if to a slightly lesser (and less insane) extent as Fox News.
@@harmreductionman4474 I think we might have a different idea of where the "center" is. Fox is certainly right to far right, but I don't recall any white supremacists talk - some are pretty pro-Trump, but that's about it. I don't watch much of any of them these days since it is mostly OpEd junk. Just get a few tid bits off RUclips and carry on with life.
Isn’t that what’s called the daily news bulletin? World News Tonight, CBS Evening News etc
I love you John Stewart!!! You and John Oliver are the best people in the world along at getting deep into a serious story, creating a narrative, and continuing to provide comedy with it. Thank you
Lmao they’re deff best at creating a narrative
Was Trump gettomg a bjob behind the podium?
Mueller's investigation was a big nothing burger that Bob himself knew would fail from the start, but he strung it out for the full term of Trump's Presidency to allow the media to cast a negative light on Trump through leaked lies. In the end, the media was left to throw a tantrum for how unfair it is for Trump wanting "to protect his Presidency". So the media is now upset Trump didn't roll over and accept all the lies they made up for years. This is a true narrative, and anyone will be furious if personally subjected to this kind of treatment for years.
hes married, so....
John Oliver’s show for 2 years was basically we have to arrest Trump for crimes he didn’t commit.
Re-watching this in March '23 and the media is still manically engaged in an "edging party" over the umpteen indictments that are "about to fall."
Thank you so much...you have in the most enjoyable and smart way possible have so eloquently expressed the frustrations of so many of us...love you Jon...so thankful you are back speaking on issues like only you can...
Thanks for this John...the country has never needed it more.
Damn i missed Jon Stewart... Its so good to see his political comedic commentary... Been years... Thank you.
Jon is a legend, miss him on the daily show❤
Thank you for being a great voice of reason amongst the cluster f*** of news reporting in circulation nowadays. You and Russell Brand are tremendously appreciated.
Russel Brand is a guy who wants to be the one to unravel the conspiracy but is just pointing out obvious shit like "maybe the military industrial complex controls shit"
Brand is and always has been an attention seeking moron with little to no wit at all. He, like many others right now, just realized RUclips is where it's at. I was interested when I learned about the stuff he talks on his channel, so I listened into one of his bits, sounded reasonable for a minute or so, so I turned it off and thought nothing of it. Much later I was bored out of my mind and somehow stumbled across one of his other bits. Listening in more than just a few minutes almost made me feel sick. The guy uses the arsenal of people like Stewart, Chappelle and so on, but only to present himself. Nothing he speaks of he provides depth or his own opinion for, because he has none of that. Done no research, has no opinion. The reaction he shows to the things he presents are a dead giveaway, it's Tucker Carlson-level disingenous. No disrespect for that, many more people rely on this sort of clownery to make ends meet these days (and you and at least 80 other people enjoy that sort of thing, so there's a market), but styling himself like a prophet for truth is mildly off-putting, to say the least.
Jon Stewart is a great truth teller and hilarious. Keep the truth alive for humanity and the planet and all life. 👍 👍 💖
I don't agree with his take on CRT, at least so far.
Funny but full of it.
I've always watched a variety of outlets for news knowing that no one place has it all.
However, after watching Viva Frei's Live Stream during the Canadian Trucker Rally I will NEVER watch again. What was reported LIVE and what was reported on the NEWS were not the same. This only made the Spin more obvious.
Jon Stewart is a shining STAR of wisdom and honesty. So glad you are back!
That's not true. Was the mainstream news lying when they reported that pat king was an organizer and racist who thought white people had the strongest bloodline?
Viva only gave on the ground video. He never dug deep into the organizers and people putting the event together.
Excellent research and presentation as usual. Thank you.
I didn't realize I missed Jon Stewart, but we all need him. Thank you for coming back sir
Thank you Jon for highlighting the egregious sensationalism witch the actors of the news are so guilty of.
Jon has inspired a new term which I will use as long as I live: “newsplooge”, the messy, unbecoming and arguably dissatisfying result of an overwrought, histrionic media on any given issue.
Read Reuters...nothing else compares. There isn't zero bias. That's an impossibility. But it's as good as it gets. Most news organizations get their stories from Reuters facts, and build a Dan Brown novel out of it.
Thank you Jon for my biggest laugh of the month. With Bill Barr's ingenious rewriting of the Mueller Report for the mainstream media now revealed, with daily recurrences of anchors and commentators reaching for the Thesaurus to cover a routine arraignment, this is funnier than ever.
I love Jon Stewart and his sense of humor! And how he calls bullshit out! Love it!
Jon... you are like the only newscaster that I'll take the time out of my day to listen to. We need you dude. I'll go gonzo and start kicking people's ass but you sir... are doing a great job.
As much as I feel we alllllll could have used a little bit of John Stewart during the entire five years of the Trump era, I'm beyond thrilled that he's made a return to our lives. Not gonna lie, I was kinda hurt that he left us all to our own devices there for a while. But he's BACK! And that's what really matters!
Thank Jon for doing real journalism and satire at the same time😅
😂REAL JOURNALISM??😮😂😂 WOW..YOUR EVEN MORE DELUSIONAL THAN HE IS!!!😮
I agree 100%. The media keeps milking every single situation showing a monumental desperation.
They are always priotizing scandals, laziness, superficial perspectives, irrelevance...
They suck
It’s like when you wrote a paper in high school and you just rewrote parts of the textbook or something in your own words, without even understanding the meaning of your own words.
For one, the choice to air really bad ads...over and over...doesn't help with their cred.
Time to end pharma direct marketing.
No way! How will I know what drugs to tell my doctor to prescribe me?
@@ichijofestival2576 'advertisers don't influence the show'. I don't see how you can make that claim, because nothing has fundamentally changed
I missed you Jon Stewart!!! You help me cope with things the way they are these days. Thank you 🙏
Jon you really found your calling. Your leadership gives us a path to the facts and calling out the fake news. Don’t let (want a be journalist for ratings) get away with this stupidity we witness on all media.
I am so happy Jon is back and saying what we are saying and thinking.
You mean telling you what to think. I know it's tough.
Welcome back Jon! Great to see you, hilarious you highlighted the ridiculousness of our media, but also pointed out their 4am talking points being so consistent 😂
Do what you do, Jon. Thank you. Sometimes it's hard to laugh at all the crazy bs. Feels good.
I could genuinely see Stewart running for a high Government office some day. His ability to communicate with people in this country is unmatched.
Problem is that the other candidates would slander him so badly for being "unprofessional"
Jon Stewart is too smart to run for office.
@@Owen_loves_Butters after trump and other prominent repubs thats an utter non sequitur
😮HE WOULDNT EVER DO THAT!! HE MAKES MORE RIGHT WHERE HES AT!! PRETENDING TO GIVE A SHIT ABOUT ANYTHING OR ANYONE EVER, ASIDE FROM HIS RATINGS AND OVER-INFLATED BANK ACCOUNT!!! YOU ACTUALLY THINK THIS LITERAL COMEDIAN IS A POLITICIAN??😮 THEN YOUR JUST AS DELUSIONAL AS JON IS...IF NOT MORE!!🤔😑 HES NO DIFFERENT THAN ANY OTHER JOURNALIST!! HE TWISTS AND REFRAMES THE ACTUAL NEWS SO TO MAKE IT LEAN IN HIS POLITICAL FAVOR!!! THERES ALWAYS 3-SIDES TO EVERY NEWS STORY!!! AND IF YOU THINK FOR ONE SECOND THAT HE IS ON THE "TRUTH SIDE" THEN YEAH....YOURE A FOOL!!😂
Obama was already president when they attacked him for the tan suit. 🤦🏽♀️ They have too much ammunition against Jon. I would love him to be President 🎉but I'd hate to see what they did to him and his family. 😢
Jon thank you so much for doing this again. I can tell it takes its toll on you. Just look at that face.
You make me laugh every time and you can still run circles around very intelligent people who are in positions of power during your interviews. Keep it up man, the world needs this more than ever. Thanks for standing up to hypocrisy
i see that facial expression, too. i call it defeat exhaustion.
So happy hes back. Didnt realise how much i missed the real Daily Show.
they neutered the daily show by putting trevor noah on it. the sabotage was by design.
The real Daily Show's still called the Daily Show.
Then again, you included a far right con artist like Jordon Peterson on your channel playlist, so I shouldn't be surprised....
@@juststatedtheobvious9633 Wow. You enjoy being a dingus? Agree with Jordan Peterson, or disagree with him...
He's smarter than me. And 💯 smarter than you. Thanks for your opinion though.
@@emhu2594 some argued the same when jon replaced craig kilborn. Adapting to change isn’t easy for everyone
@@cavemanlawyer5608 Trevor Noah is nothing like this. He's a culture leftist not an economic leftist.
Part of the problem is how to fund journalism without advertising, corporate donation and profit motives.
How to fund journalism without sensationalism and confirmation bias to drive paying viewership.
How to fund journalism out of government revenues without bias toward the current party on power.
The answer may be the second one, but we need to be education ourselves on the role and value of journalism, what is pure journalism, and be willing to pay $$$ for subscription to it enough to get decent quality without advertising and government aid.
So nearly impossible.
@@daarksideyt In very short order those state-financed channels will merge into a single mouthpiece of the state that just happens to have 2 heads.
How does Google manage to make money? I honestly don't know because everytime I use the service(and it is free) I do not have to pay for it! They are very clever.
@@charleswomack2166 1. They sell your data. What you search for and what sites you visit is marketing data they sell to almost anyone buying.
2. They sell top billing in your searches. When you search for something the first few websites that pop up in your list often paid to get there.
3. They own RUclips, when their link sends you to a RUclips video and you end up watching an ad they get paid for it.
Honest journalists would not pretend that the USA had "The Rule of Law". The problem is pretending that the USA is a country with laws.
The media should stop pretending that the USA is better than North Korea.
Stop being silly Media!!
@@abram730 There are problems, but it's not _that_ bad... yet.
This is so brave and right on. I know there is a respect and like between these news casters at MSNBC and John. Yet he states the truth bc he is not tied to corporate media.
He knows many of them wish they could resort without worrying about ratings or if ppl like you.