What are magnetic monopoles?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 авг 2016
- MoEDAL experiment spokesperson, Jim Pinfold explains magnetic monopoles and the work of the MoEDAL experiment.
Find out more about recent discovery from MoEDAL experiment: home.cern/fr/news/news/physic...
Producer
CERN Video Productions
Director
Noemi Caraban
Content
Paola Catapano
Camera
Jules Jordan
Editing
Noemi Caraban
Graphics
Daniel Dominguez
Andy Kale
Infography
Daniel Dominguez
Noemi Caraban 
Наука
![Eminem - The Death of Slim Shady [Album Trailer]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/X0HIrS6kUYI/mqdefault.jpg)
I need to find a giant monopole magnet so I can put it in my spaceship and let the cosmic magnatism propell my ufo
That was fascinating! I will learn more. Thank you!
What a nice quality of video thank you!
I've learned something. Cool.
I'd like to hear more about this subject.
Is magnetic charge conserved? So would magnetic monopoles still only be created in pairs, even though they could then be separated?
Like nuclear fission u mean, becuse that would be 😎, but back to the serius, yes, that is probably a say to Do it
Quantum magnetic entanglement
No, magnetic field strength depends on relative motion.
Extropic Function of Universe can be Obfuscated , yes, but not removed from function of universe... Webster's Unabridged is another matter...
Yes, magnetic charge would be conserved just like electric charge is. So magnetic monopoles would be created (from particles with no magnetic charge) in pairs of opposite charge, or other combinations such that the total charge is zero. Likewise, a magnetic monopole cannot decay except into other particles with magnetic charge.
You can positively or negatively charge any round metal object if moved near the outer top/bottom positive/negative edge doughnut magnets, their atoms all start showing the opposite charge, so you can charge them to be positive or negatively charged, different metals retain their charge for longer periods of time or less depending on their density, for example you could get a ball bearing about 1cm from the magnet and spin it around without touching the magnet but close enough that its within its magnetic pull, after a few rotations it will be positively charged and if you move it towards the opposite pole without touching it you will get push back briefly until they change direction again. this means you can create a series of permanant magnets on each side of a track with S facing in, positively charge a ball bearing then shoot it at high speed. as long as the magnetic charge is greater on the doughnut magnet compared to the track itself it will push it along the track, as soon as equal out the ball bearing will stop. while monopoles don't exist as magnets themselves you can charge other objects to act like them.
Hey Jim, is it true that the field produced by a monopole reaches out farther than a standard magnet?
Yes,because the former is more ionising
I make monopole magnets
Electric field of an electric charge decreases with the square of a distance; so would magnetic field of a hypothetical magnetic charge. Conversely, magnetic field of a dipole magnet decreases with cube of a distance (so would electric field of an electric dipole). And just like there are no known particles with a magnetic charge, so there are no known particles with an electric dipole moment. Theory suggest that particles like electrons should have a small electric dipole moment; but this is too small to measure. Likewise, some theories predict that there can be magnetic monopoles (particles with a magnetic charge), but there's no positive evidence of their existence.
*So, CERN does exist. I must confront The Organization.*
@Dmitri Kozlowsky J meant it as a joke. If you would watch Stein;s Gate you would get it.
@Dmitri Kozlowsky Wow you're fun
@Dmitri Kozlowsky what?
@Dmitri Kozlowsky Who is afraid of the Collider?
As far as I can tell the only reason it exists is for theoretical physicists trying to keep their funding for coming up with a new magic particle every week.
What actual technology, or tangible discovery has come from CERN? Maybe it's just laundering money, since they don't produce anything.
@@anarchoaristocracy8368 The discovery of the Higgs Boson?
Could planets be the result of matter accumulating on the vector field of monopoles?
Sure: on gravitational monopoles. (Any object with mass is a gravitational monopole, just like any electric charge is an electric monopole.)
utilità a livello pratico dell'esperimento?
This could be the key to the gate of finding new ways to harness previously unknown manifestations of the forces of nature to create a new level of technology...
nice explanation
My father developed a theory, that sayes, that relict monopoles are possibly the only monopoles rest in our Universe, or maybe the monopoles don't exist in our age of the Universe's history.
Magnets could be anti-matter fountains. Black holes are just giant magnets, absorbing matter (or at least trying to), expelling invisible anti-matter.
Lol when I was a toddler playing with magnets I used try to cut north and south in half. Then questioned and searched about it only to be more confused on why and how.
I have derived the equation by combining Schrodinger's wave equation with the electromagnetic's equation, and find the monopole magnet field is the gravitation's field. The gravitation's potential energy that comes from the monopole magnet is = ((uo*q/(4*pi*c))^2)*((2*pi*c^3)/h)*(m/r). The ((uo*q/(4*(pi^2)*c))^2) is Planck length squared, so : ((uo*q/(4*(pi^2)*c))^2)*((2*pi*c^3)/h) is G.
uo=4*pi*10^-7
c=speed of light
q=electron's charge
h=planck constant
r=the distance from the particle to a point
m=mass
...NOICE!
you guys make a philosopher's stone yet?
I studied this in the derivation of Maxwell's second equation
Hi....is it possible to use only magnetic fields to ensure a persons healthy "body".........
if you want to have a healthy body, then I recommend you not to be in the presence of magnetic fields that much.
cern obviously has know about monopoles for a while to have bulit a way to capture monopoles in there experiments
Well they've known about them theoretically, but no one has ever found one in an experiment.
Big BANG THEORY BROUGHT ME HERE
Me too
ofc monopoles could have briefly existed at the big bang before it became stable with electromagnetism, but if that's so why can't we recreate them in particle accelerators?
I poli magnetici elementari appartengono al magnetone molecolare e sono indivisibili perchė esprimono il senso della direzione di una forza magnetica.
you are going to blow us to bits !!
lol
lol
@@Simp_Zone To be fair there would be no possibility of a nuclear winter if we were still using pointy sticks...
can you make an explanation video on your hair?
What about the torsional properties of a magnetic 'poles' magnetic field flux? You know, how the N and S 'poles' have a torsional property to its magnetic force which is in a counter rotational orientation to the opposite pole. (This can be EASILY demonstrated BTW) How would a particle exhibit the same torsional rotational properties at every point of its spherical boundary?
Riddle me that will ya?
And if you want a hint to what the answer is, i'll give U a small one... IT DOES NOT, AND CAN NOT EXIST.
The only manner in which a magnetic force field can become manifest is if it inherently has a dipole configuration. The only way in which a particle, or anything, can have a magnetic 'monopole' is if the magnetic force is manifest from a dipole configuration existing but the specific attributes and properties it inherits, results in a magnetic force field where one 'pole' reigns supreme/dominant over the other one. And our technology and tooling is only able to detect/discern the existence of the dominant pole. Think of subatomic compositions that present themselves in a Halbach array, where the dominant pole/force largely encapsulates the weaker pole/force, becoming virtually undetectable/indiscernible to our technology/tooling.
what is the difference between a magnetic monople the as big as a planet and earth gravity. we know that gravity only pulls. what about a magnet that only pulls and we know that all matter is magnetic given the magnet that act on them is strong enough. the question is would a magnetic monopole push matter and a inverted magnetic monopole pull matter.
noice.
How to get a magnetic monopole: just cut a magnet in half.
😂😂😂😂 wrong!!!
Why are you not showing us those pictures from pixel cameras you talked about?
do you have 60 terabytes free on your hard drives?
#magnetic monopoles
very helpful
Who says that one can't encompass the other?
Understood everything! 😂
Wouldn't they be fun to bounce.
Noice
Take a lot of conically shaped bar magnets, put them together (glue or solder) to a hollow sphere. Then you have a north pole on the outside, i.e. a monopole, from which the field lines radiate like an electrical charge. Hahahahahah.
Apparently you guys opened a door to hell XD
mono
pole
All our presently known scientific models and theories are slightly off.
There's been too much love/time/money/pride invested however, so they will never change.x
0:14 "no particles has been seen with magnetic charge."
So what are the particles of a magnet doing if they don't have "magnetic charge."
I thought electrons had a North and South pole.
He meant having one pole and not the other.
Dude...
Magnetic monopoles can't exist because the charge field is everywhere (Miles Mathis).
Unimatrix Zero one trollcontrol Ouch.
Wouldn’t a monopole exist as a by product of fission until it calms and balances?
We live on a large magnetic monopole orbited by another slightly more polar monopolar magnet.
Ummm.... wat
Is there any evidence for a magic particles that are responsible for magnetism?
That's two questions: 1) What particles are responsible for magnetism? Ultimately, it's the fairly ordinary particles, like electrons and protons; because these particles have a magnetic dipole moment, and so act as tiny magnets. But these particles have electric charge, not magnetic charge. 2) So do there exist particles with magnetic charge (magnetic monopoles)? Some theories predict that they should exist, but we haven't found positive evidence of their existence.
Thanks for articulate expression of a technical complex concept of physics that connects electromagnetism forced fields interactions relationships Spheres Influencing Special Relativity, Strings Theory, Quantum Observations Mechanics, Fluid dynamics simulations research engineered earth surface charged dark energy density absorbed Potency Activated Circuitry Running along Vertically Aligned Cogwheel Centers at work during both Rest / Movement States Chained Simultaneously phases locked transitions Zones Floating Dead Bodies of Living Stones in the seas sinking ships and on open airspace plane traced prime resonant planetary timelines differential frequency dynamics ranges, to responses stimulated via shadowing Biosphere Nuclear Landscape Configured toxic chemicals trapped hazy dense cloud covered climate change policy paralysis paradigm shifting focused mindset Mirroring true Self Image derived out of facts falsified senses Scaled Scattered and Silenced forever Otherwise Voices Over lived experiences, witnessed encounters and wicked episodes Undercurrents revealed eternal evils triumphant cosmic Microwave Background Radiations Convergent Axis directed condensed pulse Sequenced laser scanned thermal optics acoustics and Geospatial Engineering Weather Weaponized Citizen Caged Cats in the Cradle of Civilization Clashes, Armed Conflicts, Permanent Crisis Cascading Cobwebs Catastrophic Forest Fires wiping out Emotional Integrity Extinction gameplay because empty words are used to hide white lies in black holes falling weightlessly without gravity when truths functions collapses by default stance neither accept, nor reject and never deny just take a pause put a smiling sly face to empathic issues of concern regarding shell shock situated awareness about invisible hostile forces dominant corrupt conduct controlled internal / external / relational circling crawling and consuming viral contagious molecular machinery bonds broken yet buried alive building environment by design rapid decay doubling exposures like dying in slow motion conscious ultimate Quantum vision quest out of the depths Emergent Perception Matched Elegant Action in the total darkness transforms aloneness into oneness of jet black origins forms beginning divine birthing of the great Galactic universe.
Gravity has been discovered?
Suggest you read a biography of Sir Isaac Newton :)
Gravity is magnetic monopolarity AKA electrostatic field, radial dielectric acceleration, dielectric surface charge
huh
huh
@@cjames2925 And what is electrostatic field, radial dielectric acceleration, or dielectric surface charge?
The LHC needs to surround the Earth for any meaningful discoveries/Observations. It's too small.
Not necessary. The purpose for making these particle accelerators round is so that one may allow as many rounds as required to the accelerating particle till it achieves the desired velocity.
That's simply not true at all.
«What if we used more power?»
Answer: Another hypothetical phenomena which is impossible in reality created by physicists because they have no basic understanding of magnetism specifically and the universe generally works.
Protons being a +ve charged partical is a monipole?
The -ve electron being another monipole partical?
Together they become a dipole? (Hydrogen atom).
Then there is a dipole moment?
I think they're wrong. Their theoretical model suggests that the monopole exhibiting either a North or South charge independently and constantly is incorrect. I've learned this empirically. A monopole magnet seems to be a standard magnet with two poles but one of the poles is disabled. Therefore, the monopole magnet without a pair is in effect just another piece of metal. It exhibits no magnetic force whatsoever. That is, until you bring it's paired partner near with the pair charge flipped. Ergo, if both devices have been created as North charged, then one of the devices would have to be physically reversed to sit next to the first device. As soon as the polls on the monopole devices discover each other, they would immediately exhibit magnetic moments and bond to become a functional standard magnet with two poles. So, the model is incorrect in that a monopole magnet does not exhibit constant charge properties. More like a dancer without a partner, it just Waits if and until a paired partner shows up. I've learned this empirically, and I think you could fundamentally change the face of our technology.o
It is funny that your emprical result is only valid for magnets. They already say that if you split a magnet, you get two smaller dipole magnets. Maybe physicists should not simplify things that much, so that the oridanary trolls over the world can only talk about blue whale or whatnot.
nose?
Knows
The Earth has this magnetic electro, iron do the job
Explain why every physicist in the world seem to think monopoles like electrons, protons, and neutrons, will ever cluster to make a nucleus. They won't, but they wanna hear it anyway!
Neutrons contain electrons, which are what hold the protons together in the nucleus.
Each proton has 3 Up Quarks held together by a central electron. (A Down Quark contains an Up Quark plus an electron.)
@@starseed96 No, that's entirely incorrect. Neutrons don't contain electrons, they can decay into a proton and an electron. (While free protons don't decay into neutrons - this reaction is energetically impossible - in some radioactive atoms this reaction is possible: a proton transforms into a neutron and a positron. That's β+ decay.) And protons and neutrons in a nucleus are held together by strong force (technically, it's nuclear force - the residual strong force between quarks), not by electromagnetic force.
WHEN WILL SATAN APEAR?
Not for some time I'm afraid. He was kind of weak when we woke him, so we're still feeding him babies so he can recover his strength.
About the same time as all the pseudo-religious types like you quit spamming CERN. But if *YOU* trolls do quit spamming CERN, he will appear, not apear (sic).
Do antiparticles show signs of monopoles??? Maybe that’s why after the bing bang we have more matter, than anti-mater....
It well not happened in thes life
Semple we well get free energy
Still doesn't prove the existence of magnetic monopoles.
As if anyone was trying to prove their existence, smh...
@@adamdrewko233 The fact they look for them means they don't even understand it.
@@traininggrounds9450 I don't know how you've arrived to that conclusion, but it's wrong. They are looking for them, because the laws of physics are often symmetrical, so they expect the magnetism to be symmetrical to electricity as well. Also, I don't see your point in saying that at all - nevertheless, it sounds as if you were questioning these scientists' integrity.
@@adamdrewko233 What is a magnetic monopole? It's just a charge. So we've had the model to explain magnetic monopoles the entire time.
This is why it means they don't even understand the basics about their own theories.
How can there be a positive charge and a negative charge? These are just magnetic monopoles. If you collect them all together, they repel each other and split apart. Strucutrally, they are incapable of holding together, so we never can have an actual material that is only one charge, since every single atom in the periodic table is held together by negative and positive charges.
The actual force of attraction between positive and negative charges is magnetism. When you align polarity, you are actually lining up positive charges along an axis and the negative charges that are right next to it, along its own axis.
This alignment amplifies the force of attraction along those lines and creates the magnetic lines you see in the iron filings, when put there. But they have to come back to full circle so they end up making a connection back to the negative charges that are aligned in the other direction.
A magnet is like damascus steel in structure. One layer of positive charges pointing in one direction stacked on a layer of negative charges pointing in the other.
But a magnetic monopole is literally saying we can make a material out of just the nucleus of atoms, which is just not possible. The charges are the monopoles already and they hold together by their opposite charge.
And charge is just the spin states of energy. So their respective spin states create the force of attraction between them that we call magnetism.
So how is it that this is the basics of the electromagnetic model and yet they are searching for magnetic monopoles? Because they do not even understand their own theory.
@@traininggrounds9450 I won't even comment the scribble you've written except saying that you simply do not understand basic physics. Besides - how insolent and arrogant must you be to question CERN's understanding of physics? Who do you think you are? You're just laughable and the tone of your statements is ludicrous.
Bullshit. I want to speak to the CEO of CERN.
cern obviously has know about monopoles for a while to have bulit a way to capture monopoles in there experiments