I took criminal law without any background knowledge and found this video very helpful in guiding my revision and preparation of the exam! Thanks a lot
Hi, at the end could I argue that on the part of qualifying trigger, under 55(6)(c) that sexual infidelity would not be a qualifying trigger, hence Kate could try to plead diminish responsibility. And intoxication is not a recognise medical condition, but if there is a combination of Kate's medical condition(depression) and intoxication, defence of disminish responsibility could be allow(R v Dietschmann). Thanks sir for the useful video. Kindly correct me if the principle that I used to argue was wrong.🙏
Hey Hilda, you are correct on your point of sexual infidelity being disqualified as a trigger. The law requires that there must be something more beside the affair to ground the defence. The case is Clinton 2012. It has left me to wonder if it could be argued that the fact that he has been sleeping with her sister would count as that something more. I would reason that it's one thing to have an affair but to do so with such a close family member....
Please clarify that if a person appeared in personal interview after passing a competitiveexam under the reserve General category post. He did not select at the first list but his name appeared in waiting list. After a span of 10 months, he get the offer to join due to non- joining of some one of reserve category, but the illegibility of qouta of the said candidate has been expired due to getting Govt job of his one family member through reserved Quota in this span of 10 months and the name of his family has been ejected from the reserved catagory as per law. Please clarify that the candidates get the benefit of the qouta for the post or not, because at the time to get the offer he is not in reserve quota
The same way we arw using to ace criminal law, problematic questions in our class am studying international law in Girne American University of North Cyprus. Thank you so much sir to make this easy for me
I think you missed some points. Whether her depression plays any part regarding diminished responsibility. And the fact that sexual jealously is not a defense. She had a trigger later down the road when something was said to her which caused her to snap. But if she had reacted from sexual jealously, she would have failed to rely on the special defense of loss of self control. But anyways..your videos are very good. Keep up the good work.
Hi Anik. That's a good observation and a definitive argument. Thanks for establishing that viewpoint on the comments so that others may benefit for different modes of argument.
+Ferhati Simay These are mainly targeting the Undergraduate degree but a majority of the principles are applicable for the London A-Level syllabus as well.
+Ferhati Simay If you're interested in learning more, I've recently started a Tutoring Masterclass. Drop a message on the official Facebook page to discuss :) - facebook.com/TheLawSimplified
+Chigo Voller Hi Chigo. It's over Google Hangouts or Skype. If you're interested in finding out more, please drop a message on The Law Simplified Facebook page to discuss: facebook.com/TheLawSimplified
Are all UK offences in statute, because in NZ all offences are in statute making it really easy to find the method for assessing somones culpability in respect to crimes
So, i have a question. If for example, Nicki and India were arguing. India threatens Nicki with a knife and India immediately draws a revolver from her pocket and fires it at Nicki but the shot misses Nicki and hits Mary and kills her. At fhe trial for murder, India pleads self defense and accident. How would I discuss that. Is transferred malice involved? Would harrassment come our of this?
I took criminal law without any background knowledge and found this video very helpful in guiding my revision and preparation of the exam! Thanks a lot
Indeed it's simplified... Thanks a lot
Hi, at the end could I argue that on the part of qualifying trigger, under 55(6)(c) that sexual infidelity would not be a qualifying trigger, hence Kate could try to plead diminish responsibility. And intoxication is not a recognise medical condition, but if there is a combination of Kate's medical condition(depression) and intoxication, defence of disminish responsibility could be allow(R v Dietschmann).
Thanks sir for the useful video. Kindly correct me if the principle that I used to argue was wrong.🙏
Hilda希尔达 you are correct
Hey Hilda, you are correct on your point of sexual infidelity being disqualified as a trigger. The law requires that there must be something more beside the affair to ground the defence. The case is Clinton 2012. It has left me to wonder if it could be argued that the fact that he has been sleeping with her sister would count as that something more. I would reason that it's one thing to have an affair but to do so with such a close family member....
These videos are so helpful! Thank you so much! You are amazing keep up the good work!!🎉
really helpful, thank you! :)
Please clarify that if a person appeared in personal interview after passing a competitiveexam under the reserve General category post. He did not select at the first list but his name appeared in waiting list. After a span of 10 months, he get the offer to join due to non- joining of some one of reserve category, but the illegibility of qouta of the said candidate has been expired due to getting Govt job of his one family member through reserved Quota in this span of 10 months and the name of his family has been ejected from the reserved catagory as per law. Please clarify that the candidates get the benefit of the qouta for the post or not, because at the time to get the offer he is not in reserve quota
Wonderfully explained
Really help !! Thank you very much.👍
The same way we arw using to ace criminal law, problematic questions in our class
am studying international law in Girne American University of North Cyprus.
Thank you so much sir to make this easy for me
This is so useful
Could you please do another more like this
Solid vid my g.
great job sir...
I think you missed some points.
Whether her depression plays any part regarding diminished responsibility. And the fact that sexual jealously is not a defense. She had a trigger later down the road when something was said to her which caused her to snap. But if she had reacted from sexual jealously, she would have failed to rely on the special defense of loss of self control.
But anyways..your videos are very good.
Keep up the good work.
Hi Anik. That's a good observation and a definitive argument. Thanks for establishing that viewpoint on the comments so that others may benefit for different modes of argument.
Can you please summarise the case of Rex vs Blom appellant AD 1939.
Hi
How do we book a private lesson with you please.
Hi. Drop me an email to setup a one-on-one session: shaveen@outlook.com
Can you pls use the IRAC method
i need how to case work with in articles
Are these videos for A-levels or an undergraduate degree?
+Ferhati Simay These are mainly targeting the Undergraduate degree but a majority of the principles are applicable for the London A-Level syllabus as well.
The Law Simplified
Okay, thanks for your reply :)
+Ferhati Simay If you're interested in learning more, I've recently started a Tutoring Masterclass. Drop a message on the official Facebook page to discuss :) - facebook.com/TheLawSimplified
The Law Simplified
Okay, I'll check it out :)
I was hoping for a written answer. Thank you anyway!
Have a look: go.thelawsimplified.com/QACriminal
hello how does the private tutorials work?
+Chigo Voller Hi Chigo. It's over Google Hangouts or Skype. If you're interested in finding out more, please drop a message on The Law Simplified Facebook page to discuss: facebook.com/TheLawSimplified
HEY bro plz i would like to request you to make lecture notes from Alevels THE English Legal System 8th edition book
May we get the written coppy of answer?
go.thelawsimplified.com/QACriminal
Are all UK offences in statute, because in NZ all offences are in statute making it really easy to find the method for assessing somones culpability in respect to crimes
No, Uk offences ain't in the statutes.
So, i have a question. If for example, Nicki and India were arguing. India threatens Nicki with a knife and India immediately draws a revolver from her pocket and fires it at Nicki but the shot misses Nicki and hits Mary and kills her. At fhe trial for murder, India pleads self defense and accident. How would I discuss that. Is transferred malice involved? Would harrassment come our of this?
Can you please explain me a proposition about murder
Test for tests sake 😄
good ole kate had plenty of time to cool off
2nd degree murder.
That would apply in the US not in the UK.