"1:30" : " As his opponent moves forward, the parry must be provoked" How can we do this with referee who think that's go forward is already having "right of way" ? But i'm agree, it's the best timing to attack ! (And to take the "right of way" = parry should be provoked !) Now you have to convince the referees and your opponent.
Looks like the fencer on the right is parry after the disengage. Also that feint is quite far away. Even for a demonstration surely it should be closer to the target.
"1:30" : "
As his opponent moves forward, the parry must be provoked"
How can we do this with referee who think that's go forward is already having "right of way" ?
But i'm agree, it's the best timing to attack ! (And to take the "right of way" = parry should be provoked !)
Now you have to convince the referees and your opponent.
we call it a disengage in english (note for the subtitles) - cool video
Looks like the fencer on the right is parry after the disengage.
Also that feint is quite far away. Even for a demonstration surely it should be closer to the target.
6th after one year ...... wow
Hi
This isn't a compound attack. It's a second intention. Compound attacks typically include 3rd or 4th intentions
Its not second intention, it's a simple indirect attack
Not so. Any action that has an attack than can be true if no action, but intended as false to generate a response can be considered a compound attack.
3rd comment
First comment again 3rd time in a row
Is this german or not?
It's French,
Si.