Coffee Campaign: DAY 7 HUGE Air, Sea & Land Battle | DCS WORLD
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 25 сен 2024
- PATREON(monthly donations): / grimreapers
PAYPAL(one-off donations): www.paypal.me/...
WEBSITE: grimreapers.net/
TWITCH(stream): / grimreaperscap
FACEBOOK: / grimreapersgroup
TWITTER: / grimreapers_
Want to join GR, and have DCS? Join here: / discord (16+ age limit)(You must own minimum 3 DCS WORLD modules/planes if you want to fly)
Music:
Brian Kevin Calmes / user-205266259
Barry Fitzgerald fitzync.wixsite...
Danheim • Danheim - Mannavegr (F...
#GRCampaign #DCSCampaign #CoffeeCampaign #GR #DCSWorld #GRMission #DCSMission
![How To Get BETTER At War Thunder [Air RB] | Altitude And Why It's Important](/img/1.gif)
a f-10 map for a bout 30 sec once in a while, with some explanation would greatly enhance the viewers understanding of the tactical situation. Otherwise - great video AS USUAL. I LOVE THIS CAMPAIGN !!!
I was thinking some subtitles every once in a while. Just something simple like, "bad guy tanks rolling in"
Still, great videos. I appreciate your work Cap! Lots of fun!
lol, that AAV comes flying down that bridge! @9:23
Lots of good killing and rendering ineffective! Way to go! Don't get cocky. The cruise missile strikes were impressive. So were the Mavericks. A ton of good lessons in this mission, both what and what not to do. Good job.
Also, if DCS is following, there are a lot of good takeaways about what works and what needs improvement.
Michael Flagg for instance mixed group weapon deployment by Ai 🤔
Exactly.
Great jobs guys. Looking forward to the next mission. I feel bad for the Harriers, but I guess that is the side effect of good team work.
I'll drill the harriers next mission until they beg to go home 😋
NICE!!! One of the best DCS Videos I have ever seen!!
Welcome Sir
You sir know how to build excitement for your campaign videos. Really felt movie like
Nice job by the Tomahawks and especially the A-10's!
in the into there is a bombing run by 2 Viggens, the bombing was on a village that Im sure you cleared with intel it was only enemy occupied but my question is do you actively avoid bombing mosques. Ive been watching you guys for years, you helped me get sober and kept my morale up and helped me forget laugh and entertained me all round. I was a Royal Marine cdo, Im asking because we dont and cant legally damage mosques. Thanks lads X
Nice video. I am really loving this campaign. It's the video I look forward to the most a few times a week. Thanks.
0.30 You know when you do those 3rd person cut-aways are you switching the camera during flight or after as the mission is recorded?
Nice bit of Macross whimsy on the F-15s
nice Robotech reference with the f-15s lol
I really dig the RDF/UN Spacey paint scheme on those Eagles/Valkyries.
is this command and conquer and ace combat music im hearing?
It's Ace Combat
Nice nostalgic music of ace combat
Really liked this one. Everything I saw (except for the end, but we know what happened there) was awesome. I think the improvements made were awesome, the filming was really good and Blood's plan was great. It's one thing to have a AWACs, it's another to have a Air Battle Manager. The availability of the harriers without orders is something that could have been fixed using a ABM with a over all OPORD to follow. Also, secondary and tertiary targets could be assigned pre-H hour. If air assets need to be moved around the battle space you need someone to do that. AWACs is normally focusing on the enemy activity and vectoring fighters for intercepts and to cover stuff. But the over all battle picture, and the total assets in the fight are too big a picture for one asset to handle (thus the existence of JSTARs). Something to think about. Very good work. Keep it up.
52:10 that's F1 driver reaction times!
Macross F-15's you can have a like for those alone. Like the series but a couple of questionable tactics in previous vids. The Mig team seems to have a lot less trouble on take-off's. Your guys always seem to have one guy going squirrel on take off and that A-10 crashing was...interesting in the last vid.
24:31 that poor manpad
Cap at 36:46 when you were starting your Viggen and flipping between the shots of the Tomahawks a song came to mind that you might have wanted to use.... It's the theme to the 80's TV series Street Hawk by Tangerine Dream.... That could have been pretty cool to have playing while you were getting the bird fired up and flipping video shots.... just a observation :)
You know Cap would have to rock the fingerless gloves and the "Members Only" jacket too...
24:31 I just saw a man get a Tomahawk squarer in the face than anyone ever has and just go up in a cloud of red mist O_o
lol sweet
Realistic simulator is realistic
Those robotech skins on the F15's are bad ass
I sympathise with the harriers having had a planned role but not in practice actually getting to do anything.
Cap, really magical, +60mins of pure tactical entertainment ! You are on your way to score the DCS oscar !
😎
Although from a tactical side, hey GR’s, get the sh*t together and start better coordinating. Miscommunication cost you 3 very usefull Harriers ... shame. Maybe you need a battlefield commander running the ATC and checking priorities/actions ?
Keep up and good hunting !
It would be extremely helpful on these videos if you're able to put a small map in the corner with the relative area each plane is during the cuts from plane to plane so we can follow along. Right now it looks like the same Mig-29 shot down nearly everyone
Good thinking
@@grimreapers I have my moments...not very many...but I have them
Is the AH-64 Longbow not available for ground pounding in DCS?
at 20:28... I love how that Tomahawk is using lifting body technology lol... yeah I know it's most likely a glitch in the game but it's still cool looking :)
It is using lift. The jet engine doesn't have much to push and it moves rather fast after initial rocket boost. No bugs there.
You guys stayed focussed on the aim today and achieved more. You displayed Good concentration of force with tomahawk, ground and air strikes. Sure, bit of a shame that the Harriers had a litle nightmare because, for once, an effective CAP screen had kept the A10s alive to really mashup the primary target. How many times do the Hogs get wiped out with no survivors? not today! Despite that Harrier individual disappointment, (and the angry Harrier driver did have a point about what was briefed,) I would say you all performed at a higher level as a team today, and whatever gets briefed can get changed once the mission goes live. The GCI worked hard and probably was just maxed out with people all doing their best to keep situational awareness up...maybe he simply did not hear the Harrier request for trade...maybe a lesson, but on balance, a really good result for the blues!
Kevin Woolsey Thanks for that honest review of my GCI performance, you're right about being very busy. I did hear their call for action but still felt that the harriers were too vulnerable with the carrier group that close to their SAMs. Then after some more incursions from Red aircraft (which I felt were better dealt with by the F-5 and F-15 CAP flights instead of putting a harrier with a mixed loadout against migs with pure AA loadout). Once there was a lull in the action I spent most of my mental capacity on making sure the CAP flights were reloaded and back in position. Meanwhile the other CAS group didn't suffer losses or heavy resistance so it didn't cross my mind to give Sabre the green light to wreck more havoc. When the Migs did come over the hill near the end of the mission I would think that having both the A-10 and Harriers over the Alpha region would have created utter chaos and we would've lost more airframes than we did. I do feel sorry about not using the harriers and will make more effort to follow the briefing timeline.
Red15 With the extra detail in your reply I would now suggest you made the right call as the Commander on scene. Your rationale seems sound, and it would seem to have been to keep the Harriers on the deck and out of harms way. Yeah, the plan did initially include Harrier tasking, but things changed and you made a decent assessment of the best course to take..which did not include Harriers. It is, of course, a game, and it must have been a bit boring for the puff-jets ...so I can also understand that if they made time to go online they want to get involved and that is why they got frustrated, and at least one was killed if I recall. Depends on how seriously we all want to view things...Hardcore mil sim guys would perhaps argue that the Harriers needed to stay on deck, preserve their airframes, and not wander about unilaterally without proper CAP and get killed. Less serious view is, we all want to go flying at some point and not waste an hour doing nothing. Either way, it should still be fun, don’t fall out over it, and learn to take the wider view.the GRs kicked ass today and all should enjoy the contribution...if if,for some, it was sitting on deck not being killed. and you still did a decent job at GCI....I could probably offer some tips on your RT phraseology but, hey, at least you are there giving it a go. On another day the Harriers will get all the action and the Hogs will get smashed again.
+Red15
That fair, but I don't really understand why you'd allow the A-10s to go in to do CAS while holding back the Harriers because you felt it was too dangerous. Both the A-10 & AV-8 are primarily used for CAS. And both the A-10 & AV-8 are sub-sonic aircraft. And the AV-8 has anti-radiation missiles. They work well together and compliment one another's capabilities. And your Harrier pilots have actually shown to be pretty decent.
Don't worry about letting Harrier pilots run loose, especially with other aircraft helping them. The only time Harriers shouldn't be allowed to operate is when dedicated fighters and interceptors are known to be there at that exact time or they can't run away fast enough to escape (which is more likely than the former). Basically, treat the Harriers like a more versatile but less survivable A-10. It can kill tanks, bomb installations and perform SEAD and even occasionally kill threats in the air, but it can't really do anything as well as the dedicated aircraft for those missions.
Cumulative attrition tracking in campaigns is clearly the achellies heel of GR just like in real life. No wonder GR is always up for money making gigs.
I'd love to see a "Tactical Debrief" from you on this mission. There's quite a bit to learn if you focus on the CAP positioning and timing. Less focus on missile ranges and combat after the merge than the older Tac Debrief videos. I root for red, but the blue CAP flights got some flak in the comments here that is likely not warranted considering the Mig's location, red SAM ranges, and the AWACS calls blue CAP had.
sadly no debriefs at the moment :(
Sterling work. Very entertaining!
Robotech!!!! The F-15s were in Veritech skins! Awesome!
Good stuff guys, but I cant help thinking that Cap may better served to fly a loser formation in order to go over the systems a few times and visualizing the approach to target.. may help in avoiding the issue today.
Aren’t there supposed to be wings on the cruise missiles???
Noticed glacial skies from ac zero in the beginning
Auntystatic has a good point. Looks like the fighter boys were off making movies (as usual), while the bomber boys do the real work (as usual) and take losses (as usual).
I'd say that your cap were being drawn away from the bomber package, probably deliberately.
nope the cap did all that it needed and were generally in the right places
I refer you to 7:46 of the video.
Yes which we were and then the gci vectored us to a close danger as we had cleared the harrier area for the time
I'm sure all the shot-down Harriers and A-10s will thank you.
yes the harriers were because at the end of the mission they were going for the wrong objective and so they were in the wrong place ie hostile cap area, and the a10s were nothing to do with dagger. Thank You.
i do love all of your videos and appreciate all the hard work that goes into not only filming but editing all of these videos.
I do have a constructive request that i think will make the vids better for the audience. It's very hard at times to hear the radio traffic because of the background music being of equal volume or louder than the radio traffic . I think it would be good to lower the volume level of the background music so that the audience can better hear all of the pilots radio traffic.
Being able to hear what the pilots are saying to each other and GCI etc. really makes a difference for the person watching being able to understand what the pilots are doing and why. Unfortunately with the background music at the level it is in all the vids it can make it hard to make out what the pilots are saying especially since Simple Radio adds static and interference to the radio comms for the sake of realism. I do like the background music since it adds to the tension level of the video. So definitely keep the music in just make it a little quieter please.
Thanks again to all the Grim Reapers Pilots for all your hard work on these wonderful videos and thanks to Cap for putting all of the vids together. You guys are definitely my favorite DCS channel on youtube. Fly straight but not safe, since you get shot down that way ;)
Roger Charles tough comrpomises
loved this vid :) like watching a film, please keep it up guys, the action is great! big fan!
Much, much better! If you plan this way, even if you take significant casualties the momentum of your forces doesn't grind to a halt. Two suggestions I can add. While everybody is jockeying into positions on the ground, you should label who is Red and who is Blue. They have different equipment but the differences are hard to see with the camouflage. Second, there was a lot of radio silence with the F-15's in the beginning. The AWACS longer ranging radar so I suggest that the "request bogey dope" call should be used rather than waiting for spikes to appear on the plane radar. The Russian planes have that Infrared seeker. I don't know it's range, but you certainly should get track of them ASAP.
Karmakshanti Vyapini
I don't understand. Do you have trouble identifying REDFOR/BLUFOR?
Fastest Gun NJ
The first few minutes of tanks and guns and trucks running around show no such differentiation, at least on my screen. And Cap normally cross cuts the shots between the two forces. The equipment portrayed has slight variations, but they wear the same camo and are not nearly as distinct as the difference between a Flanker and an Eagle. I'm just a viewer not a gamer, so I don't get enough experience with DSC to always sort out the fine details.
Sound track for 55:03? I recognize it but my brain is too tired to make the connection
Are all the external shots, target(tanks) etc all done at the time of the mission, or does DCS have some form of replay system, whereby you go back, edit, and select footage prior to upload to YT?
Brussells there is a replay system. I don’t know if he is using it or not for the shot. It kinda looks like he’s using external shots wheel playing the mission. Idk
The game saves a track file for every mission that can be loaded after in a replay. It often desyncs in multiplayer as a client so Cap gets the track file from the server host.
Looks like Cap is using both. There is a replay, but I suspect he is using the replay in some areas where he can't get the video from live external shots.
From the looks of it, sometimes he is grounded with his engines off watching the battle unfold. And sometimes he watches the replay.
Its port starboard in avaition. not left and right
That poor village. There's like a mosque, a church, a local radio station lol
What happens to your navigation system ? BER mode ?
Great video as always Cap. But since its not easy being a video producer and fighter pilot at the same time, it could be good to do a pre bombing check half way through the target. So you don't miss any basic settings.
agree Ghiost
Felt for the harriers on that one, people need to remember if guys log onto a game for 3 hours, they'll want to do something.
The lack of precision standoff weapons for harriers really seems to limit their usefulness when the opposition have modern air defenses. The only thing ive really seen them do in this series is be a stand-in SEAD platform with sidearms.
That's why we need the F/A-18C, HARMs!
+Joel Hume
Don't forget that, effectively, the Harrier - at least the AV-8 for the USMC - is their dedicated CAS bird. Harrier pilots in the USMC get very focused and detailed training on how to conduct CAS. If you are a guy on the ground and luck is not on your side and an A-10 is not available, a Marine Harrier pilot is your next best alternative as a savior.
Dear GRIM REAPERS
Can you guys please do a gulf war like campaign when the Persian and the F/A-18 Hornet come out.
They could do something similar, but don't expect Iraqi or Syria to be in the game at this time. The new map is concentrated on the "Straights of Hormuz."
Wpns Loader, oh yeah when I made the request I took that into consideration but it’s the best candidate. Because the map contains the most similar geography and environment to Iraq, and Kuwait’s own.
I could see a campaign where Iran decided to occupy both sides of the straight in a surprise attack and the Reapers are brought into to help retake the southern side and then do damage to the norther side. I could see Carrier-born ops from the U.S.S. Boaty-McBoat-Face (I think that it's name, might need to get a new one) to work on securing the Arab side and then more aggressive ops from land bases to recapture the islands then eventually attack the Iranian coast line.
So much cool potential in this!
Wpns Loader, yeah just like a simple spin off of the gulf war.
in the pipeline
Viggens really do seem bugged at bomb-release.
Its all about getting the processes complete in the right order, it is very easy to have user error spoil everything
Thanks. Makes hitting a target-of-opportunity tricky, then.....
I just don't like them to look at.
yep - its not what the Viggen is designed for ideally, it should be well planned and prepped out DAS strikes not ToT or CAS
viggen is very picky about the target altitude. If the altitude is wrong, the plane might think it's too high or too low for bomb drop. As long as QFE is correct, trigger guard is up, mode is either in NAV or ANF and weapon selector roll is set for either PLAN or DYK depending on the type of attack, the bombs should come off. Any of those things being wrong and the plane wont drop bombs.
Brilliant as always
I have a question if you came in to a straight package. Low level and then went into a vertical climb. Would you be able to release your bombs as you were going up. Once released pull away from the kill point and fly off and allow your bombs to return to the earth and hit the target. I have never seen the Grim Reaper’s do this before. Wondering if it would be a tactic to get away from Brown fire.
Toss bombing with dumb bombs is pretty inaccurate, its far better doing it using LGBs and buddy-lazing but that’s a difficult skill to master, and very dangerous for the lazing aircraft.
Repeat after me : GOO DA OO TA. Don't know why the fuck is so hard to read a map.
I have a question that bothers me for years. What happens to jettisoned external fuel tanks? Do they get salvaged or are they just left there?
As far as I know they're left there. Some russians who lived near a training area used to collect dropped tanks from miG-21s and used them to store water.
They are not likely to be useable after the plummet to the earth. I have seen some flight line damaged ones come back to life, but takes some doing and they only fell 3 feet. Did see a harrier one get blown off it's stand and roll across the flight line. That one I don't think was coming back anytime soon.
They vapourise.
They get turned into canoes
Nice video cap I enjoyed it.
Felt a bit sorry for the Harriers but I feel you're on a learning curve and certainly higher up than you were. Carry on the way you're going and I'm sure things will get even better. Special mention to the GCI, it's a thankless task but a very important one, keep at it. :-)
The balance will come but these things take time and it seemed better here than in earlier missions. it looks like the right direction.
Are the Mavericks still not working on the Harrier? I'm sure I've seen a video of you firing them from Harriers since the recent updates?
nice video cap, really fun! love a2a :')
Auto like for UN Spacey..
Also Max’s color scheme.
GOOD SHOW!
That Harrier debrief really reminded me why I no longer wanna play inside any groups. The amount of salt and blaming of others... jeez. If you can't use your comms to get through at least improvise to make best of it instead of blaming others for your mistakes. It sounded to me a lot like they failed to turn on their radios on right frequenzy and then flew straight into enemy SAMS killing themselves (which in itself is pretty rediculous as the Harrier has a fairly good RWR.) Whining like this ruins the mood for everyone.... not just the ones playing but also the people watching on youtube.
oh and before I get too gloomy: great video. I really loved those beautiful shots of missile hits and tanks emerging from trees and stuff :)
The harriers were waiting for a call from the a10s after they took out the sams. The call never came.
Yes, but in such case they should try raise someone else. Say AWACS for example, as they most likely have best comms over the entire area, and ask to relay a message to the A-10 squad. If they can't raise anyone, the fault is in their own comms. If the A-10 screwed up their comms, they could coordinate with AWACS to get themselves upto speed.
none the less, whining in debriefing for their own incompetence is just plain annoying.
Pay attention then. They made lots of calls and said as much. If you're going to criticise then take the time out to listen to exactly what they say before you criticise them. If they don't whine who's going to do the whining for them; or, if they don't stick up for themselves who's going to stick up for them?
The real point is it's a balancing act and here the balance was out and the Harriers suffered for it. But. You also have a very busy GCI controller (a pretty thankless task) Who heard their call and made a decision. The problem is if you've set time aside to play a game and you're sat around doing nothing you're going to get frustrated especially if someone else - who should have called you in - is blowing your targets away.
I've said this before about mono missioning. If the A10s had been armed for the mission they were required to do, then when they'd done it the Harriers would have to have been called in. The A10s could then have RTB-ed re-armed and returned if necessary. The first thing I said when I saw it was, why are those A10s carrying Mavericks and GBUs? Arm for the mission you are required to do, get in and get out. If anything this continued insistence of arming for targets of opportunity is what's causing the problem. If they have the loiter time and your CAP is stretched call the A10s back over the fleet and SAM coverage, send in the Harriers then send the A10s back if necessary.
There was a way around it and the Harriers have a right to fight their corner.
Yep nobody likes to watch others complain but to be fair those guys ended up twiddling there thumbs for an hour. I hate to say something that would add even more complexity to these missions but you maybe need either alternate targets or the ability for Squadron leaders to make a decision to do something else without repercussions. In the end this is not realistic war - it’s a game and people need to get up in the air and have a crack if they are going to turn up. Harrier drivers know what they can do and perhaps should be allowed to develop their own target tree based on current intel and switch to an alternate if required
Pretty fucking cool
what happened to the tomahawk wings?
Awesome video. Like it. Hell of good pictures. Nice use of the fleet. The Mig-29 is smoking like the old f-4 when not on burner. Remebers me ot the old rhino flying here in Germany. But maybe you need a little GCI training. E. g. Bullseye control, bogey dope, picture calls for CAS. Why do you use callsingns like Hammer and so on when everybody use the nicknames?
The A-10s did a good job. hasnk and keep on fighting.
The debriefs just seem to be people talking about their limited success and then other people pinning blame for things on more people. Also, why didn't the harriers go for the sam net and the A10's go for the tanks. They don't have that 30 mil for nothing...
hay cap who wins in a sustained sprint? a 15 or a 29
hartzaden 15
29 according to our tests
25:46 what does the S-3 do in DCS?
refueller I think
Really love this mission! Right on a-10c
Amazing campaign!! Were there any actual players flying the REDFOR migs?
All the REDFOR airframes you see are flown by actual GR Aggressor members
Yeah the MIG drivers fly too smartly to be AI, keeping down in the valleys and trying to bait the CAP away. Out of interest to the Aggressor pilot always stick to that side of things or do you mix the roster up?
Why Macross?
Because that's what the Patreons wanted, same reason why Girls und Panzer Harriers.
Question: You guys play like your professionals. I wanna get this game... Is there other servers for noobs and green horns? Yinnow, so we can play arcade until we figure out what all them buttons and switchiz are... Yinnow, like arcade like BF3....
We are a fairly hardcore group, there are free servers for the public to join, lots of them.
wheres the chaff from the migs in the dogfight?
The reason your bombs didn't drop was because your way point got switched from M1 to L1. I've had the same problem in the Viggen. Try one of the drop modes in ANF so the way point doesn't switch. It is possibly bugged in NAV and switches anyway.
the waypoint doesnt change if the trigger guard is up. NAV/PLAN mode is used for level bombing with drag bombs so switching to ANF would just make things worse as ANF/PLAN mode is for slick bombs
Safety wasn't up till after the waypoint switched. Re-watch it
That's why the waypoint switched. If the trigger guard had been up it would have not switched.
I thought ANF alseo but Blood says use NAV??
NAV/PLAN is for drag bombs which you had under your wings. ANF/PLAN is for slick bombs which have different ballistic values from drag bombs. Using ANF would have made your bombs fall way short.
I need the UN Spacy skin
U.N. Spacey??? lol
How do you guys make your radios sound like that?
Dixon Yant it's an option in SRS (the radio mod for dcs)
Sweet Thanks
I a not 100% certain but I think you must have been in master mode BER when you tried to drop the bombs. I have sen you switch to NAV before takeoff, but while inbound to the target your waypoint marker on the HSI was pointing at 180° all the time, that is the position when you are in BER mode. This would explain the Riggen not releasing the bombs
I think it was on NAV. He was set on M1 then at the target it switched to L1 which I believe prevented the drop.
it was in Nav at all time, that is ok?
Sorry I meant I put it in nave at take off. Otherwise it was in the default mode
Grim Reapers yea I have seen you put it in nav before takeoff. But I can’t explain why your hearing indicator on the hsi was pointing at 180 the entire time of it was in nav. Do you have the mode selector mapped to your hotas? I have, and I have changed the mode on accident before
Defninately in NAV. in BER the HUD stays cold. The marker stuck to 180° is a bug at the moment, same as the HUD image not being aligned to the horizon anymore. Might get fixed tomorrow when the Gulf map udpate arrives though, it's fixed already on the dev's side AFAIK :)
Of all your shows i like air and ships battles the only thing I don't like is wen therea combat ships don't stand still they always go side too side slow down or speed up too avoid the bombs or torpidos
Are the MiG-29s now working?
Yes, they work just like always, but they're still only the AFM and not PFM. ED has said they plan to eventually update it. That might mean months or years for all we know.
they've always worked, their Flight model though is.... questionable?
It's cancerous. There's a jarring transition from the ground to airbourne which can cause crashes in formation takeoffs. The ground also sucks you in when you're landing. Inflight the thing is too stable and behaves like a game, more or less
Which flight model? :D
(it's the SFM btw)
Luckily the Fulcrum is the last one of the FC planes to get a FM finally. And I hope they'll do that before coming up with FC4 which I'd nevertheless would appreciate anytime though. Also the Flankers need some serious work to be done on their FFB code.
My computer is so bad that the game crashes when i fire multiple С-8 КОМ missiles
Why don't u use some realistic F-15 skin? =( they look so gamey... -_- 14:05... graphics are nice but still but DCS is behind even Tornado, Falcon 3.0 etc. .. all that mixed up weapons platform chaos, gamey skins but even worse: that sterile sandbox design of DCS, no atmosphere (conflicts?), no campaign, no real content except of maybe when flying in an online squad...
eeee, america win... again... :(
First :p
360p? Dudes....
Its encoding on youtubes end - that is out of our control - Give it a while and the HD will be there
Was this a Muslim city? LoL
Supposed to be an Armor Regimental Training Facility, but what do I know, I just press the button to launch the missiles
boom goes the hospital lol :D
Is this offensive racism I see?
Yousra Ashmawy as apposed to inoffensive racism??
Great videos! Can you guys put some effort into putting some identifying badges on the planes? It’s hard to tel who is who. Keep it up!
That's a good point.
no HD??
it takes a few min for it to encode on youtubes end, untill then its SD