I am surprised it doesn't say that SV600 has a fantastic OCR software. Also it is 'slower' because it scans the entire document and therefore giving another strong feature which is - excellent image quality for even the corners
Hi, thanks for watching our video. We understand your disappointment as the other brand won this battle. Rest assured that we will take another comprehensive research regarding this. We appreciate you leaving a comment here. It helps to improve our research. To keep you updated, we recommend you subscribe to our channel and get the latest tech reviews. Have a great day!
I own the Fujitsu Scansnapsv600. I love my Fujitsu and have for years. BUT I just encountered a real problem. The Fujitsu Scansnap will not always produce quality images of small booklets, that is if you zoom in. I cannot identify what the dpi is that the scanner produces, but I recently scanned a small booklet from the 1850s. The booklet was tightly bound and very fragile. Not having to flip the booklet onto a flatbed scanner was a major plus. The quality of the image when not zoomed in on was just fine and very useable. However, the fine detain in the printing of the booklet was very blurry under even modernly high resolution. This prevented me from using the results. This is the first time that I was not able to rely upon my very much used Fujitsu scanner. I will continue to use the scanner for general archival work, but have to go back to my flatbed scanner for very detained documents. Sorry about that Fujitsu. Happily few people need to scan rare fragile documents produced by metal line engravings. For everyday use, this scanner is great, and it does not require damaging the book by forcing it onto a flatbed scanner. The software that corrects page curl can be a bit persnickety. Fortunately, a button allows users to move back to the uncorrected image so that readers can rework the settings to produce a better image. Best of all, if not working with very tightly bound books, this whole feature is rarely needed.
i do a few hundred pages of scanning daily. the czur has not broken down once, particularly since it has no moving parts. does the fujitsu have the capacity to do heavy scanning, particularly considering the moving lamp component?
I gave up half way through. Genuinely wondering if this was an auto-generated video. The voice is very artificial and say things like 'eleven point five inches' that's pretty rare 90%+ of people would say 'eleven and a half inches'. At any rate it was very poor.
One wery rare scanner, because it great but has 0 information about it almost everywhere - this is Sceyex (Kodak if i not mistaken). It look good, it portable. Interesting to look at it in comparison.
You mention that the SV600 removes finger. However I read that people have problems with this "automatic" process, and have to manually remove every finger making it unusable. Also ET18 has "Finger clots" you use, that get automatically removed and actually works. Please confirm
Hi, thanks for watching our video. As per Fujitsu manual, ScanSnap SV600 features Auto image correction that crops fingers out of the image. To know more here we provide its manual : www.scansnapit.com/_assets/pdfs/sv600-eng-brochure.pdf See you at the next one!
CZUR Link : geni.us/BVyAHN
FUJITSU Link : geni.us/81sTi
I am surprised it doesn't say that SV600 has a fantastic OCR software. Also it is 'slower' because it scans the entire document and therefore giving another strong feature which is - excellent image quality for even the corners
Hi, thanks for watching our video. We understand your disappointment as the other brand won this battle. Rest assured that we will take another comprehensive research regarding this. We appreciate you leaving a comment here. It helps to improve our research. To keep you updated, we recommend you subscribe to our channel and get the latest tech reviews. Have a great day!
I own the Fujitsu Scansnapsv600. I love my Fujitsu and have for years. BUT I just encountered a real problem. The Fujitsu Scansnap will not always produce quality images of small booklets, that is if you zoom in. I cannot identify what the dpi is that the scanner produces, but I recently scanned a small booklet from the 1850s. The booklet was tightly bound and very fragile. Not having to flip the booklet onto a flatbed scanner was a major plus. The quality of the image when not zoomed in on was just fine and very useable. However, the fine detain in the printing of the booklet was very blurry under even modernly high resolution. This prevented me from using the results. This is the first time that I was not able to rely upon my very much used Fujitsu scanner. I will continue to use the scanner for general archival work, but have to go back to my flatbed scanner for very detained documents. Sorry about that Fujitsu. Happily few people need to scan rare fragile documents produced by metal line engravings. For everyday use, this scanner is great, and it does not require damaging the book by forcing it onto a flatbed scanner. The software that corrects page curl can be a bit persnickety. Fortunately, a button allows users to move back to the uncorrected image so that readers can rework the settings to produce a better image. Best of all, if not working with very tightly bound books, this whole feature is rarely needed.
i do a few hundred pages of scanning daily. the czur has not broken down once, particularly since it has no moving parts. does the fujitsu have the capacity to do heavy scanning, particularly considering the moving lamp component?
thank you for this great comparison. they both are worthy opponents.
Hi thanks for watching 😊
And scanning resolution of SV 600 is much higher
I gave up half way through. Genuinely wondering if this was an auto-generated video. The voice is very artificial and say things like 'eleven point five inches' that's pretty rare 90%+ of people would say 'eleven and a half inches'. At any rate it was very poor.
One wery rare scanner, because it great but has 0 information about it almost everywhere - this is Sceyex (Kodak if i not mistaken). It look good, it portable. Interesting to look at it in comparison.
Sure thing, I completely agree! Rest assured that your suggestion will be included on our list for our upcoming video. Stay tuned for updates!
****01:16**** - Design and form factor
****02:38**** - Speed and performance
****04:02**** - Image correction
****05:21**** - Image quality and post-processing
****06:44**** - Unique features
****08:52**** - Overall Winner
You mention that the SV600 removes finger. However I read that people have problems with this "automatic" process, and have to manually remove every finger making it unusable. Also ET18 has "Finger clots" you use, that get automatically removed and actually works. Please confirm
Hi, thanks for watching our video. As per Fujitsu manual, ScanSnap SV600 features Auto image correction that crops fingers out of the image. To know more here we provide its manual : www.scansnapit.com/_assets/pdfs/sv600-eng-brochure.pdf
See you at the next one!
@@InTheTechRoomDid you ever actually test the real product for this video? Or are you just content farming?
The source is a specification sheet...@@elig9401
@@elig9401clearly AI generated content farming
Is this even a human being narrating?
This video is why RUclips needs downvotes.
This is probably the worst demo I have ever watched.
what a waste of time....just stock images and video...