Love Among the Roses (dir. D.W. Griffith, 1910)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 31 янв 2025

Комментарии • 18

  • @recreepy
    @recreepy 7 месяцев назад

    Bravo! You've really impressed me.

  • @PaperbackJourneys
    @PaperbackJourneys 2 года назад +2

    This is a lovely combination of action and music.

  • @NicoleMae
    @NicoleMae 3 года назад +1

    this is so lovely wow

  • @theresaholguin699
    @theresaholguin699 5 лет назад +1

    Beautiful short film. Mary was pure genius. Love her always 🎥❤

  • @uncletrick1
    @uncletrick1 3 года назад +3

    DW shot this in one day, primarily in the garden of artist Paul de Longpre, who has a street named after him in the Hollywood district.

  • @jeremysteck439
    @jeremysteck439 7 лет назад +2

    beautiful soundtrack

  • @lillinablue
    @lillinablue 4 года назад

    Nice

  • @HtopSkills
    @HtopSkills 5 лет назад

    🎥🎬

  • @volcaniadread
    @volcaniadread 5 лет назад

    we came a long way from back when

  • @davidson3053
    @davidson3053 5 лет назад

    Oi

  • @straypigs
    @straypigs 3 года назад +1

    This movie is HILARIOUS. The soundtrack is all wrong. It's a very subtle movie that you really have to see in a pristine print, and on a big screen to fully appreciate. it was shown in NYC a few years ago and the audience was howling with laughter, it was beautiful. It needs piano accompaniment, not new age music,sorry. On a Melies movie, perhaps! Not a Biograph and definitely not THIS Biograph which is a comedy of manners. The acting is so great in this one, they must have had a lot of fun filming it!!!

    • @lenas9858
      @lenas9858 3 года назад +1

      Odd...the contemporary reviews mention nothing about "howling comedy". Biograph certainly didn't describe it that way. I would say the modern audience didn't get it.

    • @TTM9691
      @TTM9691 3 года назад

      ​@@lenas9858 That's because "romantic comedy" wasn't a term back then, you imbecile. The audience was howling because it was a hip audience that caught the subtle humor; it's not broad comedy. Back then it would be described as something romantic (which it is); today we would call it a romantic comedy. And, having seen it live with a piano player, in a pristine print, I can tell you definitively that this soundtrack is completely wrong. And you, my dear, are an imbecile.

    • @lenas9858
      @lenas9858 3 года назад +1

      @@TTM9691 Sorry, but the contemporaries described it as a drama.

    • @lenas9858
      @lenas9858 3 года назад +1

      @@TTM9691 It's not unusual for a modern audience to misinterpret a bygone sentiment. That makes them more obtuse than "hip", which your comment proves.

    • @TTM9691
      @TTM9691 3 года назад

      @@lenas9858 Sorry I'm supposed to use turn-of-the-last-century nomenclature to discuss "Love Among The Roses", twit, but it was at Lincoln Center, with Ben Model playing piano (as opposed to this ridiculous soundtrack that's playing on this fuzzy print above). It was part of a summer of Mary Pickford screenings which was filled with silent film aficionados, most who had white hair so......so much for your "modern audiences" drivel. If you want to register that reviews of the time didn't refer to it as a comedy, and inquire about why the audience was laughing, that's one thing. You leave an ignorant, passive-aggressive comment, you get the reply you deserve. Now sit down and shut up.