Omega and Glashütte Original Under Swatch

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 сен 2024
  • In many ways, Omega and Glashütte Original represent mid-level watches, and while there are similarities, some brought about by Swatch, other features speaks to the uniqueness of each.

Комментарии • 69

  • @AbdulRWatches
    @AbdulRWatches Месяц назад +3

    Both make excellent watches, but my heart leans towards Glashütte Original :D Thanks Bill for the great video.

    • @watchartsci
      @watchartsci  28 дней назад +1

      The heart wants what the heart wants Abdul! Take care, Bill

  • @masterdad-zf9po
    @masterdad-zf9po Месяц назад +2

    I thought about the omega seamaster but went for the GO seaQ panorama date a few years ago. The craftsmanship is gorgeous and I’ve got no regrets. And I love the fact that when I walk into a room it’s almost guaranteed no one else will be wearing a GO, and for the most part will never have heard of it. But I’ve got a speedy on my “to buy” list, and omega does make some cool watches

    • @watchartsci
      @watchartsci  28 дней назад

      Omega makes some cool watches ok, as long as Swatch doesn't ruin them, Dad. Take care, Bill

  • @h111551
    @h111551 Месяц назад +5

    Both GO and Omega watches reflect well on Swatch. GO is the smaller artisanal Glashutte brand while Omega is many times larger than GO. GO doesn’t have a large network of ADs in the U.S. and this is probably by design given the production capacity of GO. GO is a premier dial maker both for itself and undisclosed B2B customers with its dial manufactory in Pforzheim, Germany’s traditional jewelry center, an hour or so from Glashutte. Overall, Omega has some very well conceived and long established references which attract long term collectors because of the depth of the Omega catalogue and the historicity of the brand. As for the silicon hairsprings, Omega is a very forward brand technologically speaking as witnessed by its embrace of George Daniel’s co-axial escapement after both Patek and Rolex rejected it. There is a case for silicon hairsprings even though there are some negative attributes. All things considered, I think that Omega is genuinely motivated by what it believes is in the best interests of its customers and their long term ownership of Omega timepieces.

    • @watchartsci
      @watchartsci  Месяц назад

      Howard, both may reflect well on Swatch; but I don't think Swatch reflects well on GO and Omega. Take care, Bill

    • @aye_tee
      @aye_tee Месяц назад +1

      GO moved their dial production to Glashütte during Covid.

    • @h111551
      @h111551 Месяц назад

      @@watchartsci I think that we are sometimes too hard on the parent companies even though they admittedly make mistakes. It is easier to sit in the stands at McKale Memorial Center and criticize the Wildcat’s basketball coach than it is to be the Wildcat’s basketball coach. Nicholas Hayek did many constructive things to help the revival of the Swiss watch industry after the Quartz Crisis including rescuing a number of brands and suppliers earmarked for extinction.

  • @cedshred1676
    @cedshred1676 Месяц назад +2

    Very few people realize that through 2021, every part of an Omega watch was made in Switzerland. That changed in 2022, when Omega shifted to allowing up to 40% by value made in China components, or made in Thailand, or Mauritius (yes, a “Swiss” watch component industry operates there), or wherever.

    • @watchartsci
      @watchartsci  28 дней назад +1

      Oh no! I didn't realize that Ced! Take care, Bill

  • @snowashesfilm
    @snowashesfilm Месяц назад +2

    That GO Vintage Seventies is stunning. I have a soft spot for TV dial watches. I have the Patek 5164, which is kind of square... and I must admit, I LOVE my Brew Metric... I have been truly eyeing that GO Seventies. It's beautiful. A bit thick though.

    • @watchartsci
      @watchartsci  28 дней назад

      Hey Charles, as I write this note I have on my big Henry Double Hairspring by H. Moser et Cie-big rectangle. Take care, Bill

  • @booijdesign
    @booijdesign Месяц назад +3

    the best thing about the senator Chronometer is that the minutes go in steps of one minute and just land exactly on the minute every time. Very very cool sneaky complication

    • @localheroEd
      @localheroEd Месяц назад

      Is this true for all Senator chronometers? Wasn’t sure if only on a few models but agree it’s very cool. Would be great to know the movement reference.

    • @jrbrown1989
      @jrbrown1989 Месяц назад +2

      That's only true while you're setting the time. During normal operation, the minute hand sweeps like normal.

    • @ollik8192
      @ollik8192 Месяц назад

      Both the Senator Chronometer and Chronometer Regulator have a system that zeroes the seconds and moves the minute hand in one minute intervals while setting the time.
      They also don't have silicon hairsprings which Bill so detests. =) It makes sense, since these models harken back to marine chronometers.

    • @watchartsci
      @watchartsci  Месяц назад +1

      Thanks for the info Boobe... looks like there are some considerations in Senator. BTW, the Senator is one of my favorite GOs! Take care, Bill

  • @EdoardoDeLarge
    @EdoardoDeLarge Месяц назад +1

    Finally have some time to watch a video from you. Glad to spend my time to.
    Thanks a lot!

    • @watchartsci
      @watchartsci  28 дней назад

      Glad to hear you liked it Edardo! Take care, Bill

  • @TheBlindSkwerl
    @TheBlindSkwerl Месяц назад +1

    I have a Glashutte Original Seaq Panorama Date. Lovely beast of a watch. The "Spezialist" collection is their designation for tool and rugged use watches.

    • @watchartsci
      @watchartsci  Месяц назад

      Thanks Blind Skwerl! Take care, Bill

  • @andresfg6788
    @andresfg6788 Месяц назад +2

    The GO's have swan neck regulators and silicon hairsprings. Just for decoration purposes

    • @watchartsci
      @watchartsci  28 дней назад

      Oh no Andres! Say it ain't so! Take care, Bill

  • @weezkidtube
    @weezkidtube Месяц назад +1

    Many thank for the quick comparisons, Bill. Must admit that a GO is still in my "in-tray" but it's tough to let it slide ahead of an ALS.

    • @watchartsci
      @watchartsci  28 дней назад

      A lot of the GO models have dodged the silicon bullet, Weez! Take care, Bill

  • @gilbertombp
    @gilbertombp Месяц назад +1

    Hi Bill, you can compare Longines and Union Glashutte too, while at it. Both Swatch, and both lower price tier than these two. 😊

    • @watchartsci
      @watchartsci  28 дней назад

      Hi Gilberto! I like things about both brands. UG is very economic. Take care, Bill

  • @Andre-yu3qs
    @Andre-yu3qs Месяц назад +1

    Fantastic, thanks for sharing Bill.

    • @watchartsci
      @watchartsci  28 дней назад

      Hey Andre, thanks man! Take care, Bill

  • @dominickcolasanto6582
    @dominickcolasanto6582 Месяц назад +1

    Very interesting selection and comparison. I do like the moon watch it just works as far as looks, form, and function. I also wouldn't own one with a silicon hairspring it ruins the traditionally and transforms the watch into a cousin of an Apple watch! Excellent video Bill thanks.

    • @watchartsci
      @watchartsci  28 дней назад

      Same here Dom! If I want silicon in my timepiece I'll get an Apple Watch. Take care, Bill

  • @mercuriall2810
    @mercuriall2810 Месяц назад +1

    Hi Bill, whilst I understand the technical benefits that silicon hairsprings and escapements offer, like you I have a strong preference for hairsprings and escapements made from more traditional materials.
    You mentioned the presence of a swan neck regulator (and therefore regulator pins) as a feature that necessarily implies a metallic hairspring.
    I believed that this was the case too, until I learned of an exception last week.
    It turns out that Horage use traditional regulators, with adjustable mobile regulator pins to shorten or lengthen the active length of the hairspring in some watches that have silicon hairsprings and escapements.
    I believe that Horage are the only manufacturer that has done this, all other movements with silicon hairsprings that I know of are freesprung.

    • @watchartsci
      @watchartsci  28 дней назад

      Mercurial, has you seen the "exception?" A 'blade' is added to the end of the silicon spring that has some give. That's their capacity to regulate. Of course they're free spring; they cannot make curb regulators with silicon. Take care, Bill

    • @mercuriall2810
      @mercuriall2810 28 дней назад

      @@watchartsci Hi Bill, I haven’t seen the system you describe. Do you know which calibres or watches Horage use it in?
      I was referring to their new Microreg technology, which has adjustable regulator pins that move along the terminal curve of the hairspring to adjust its effective length and therefore the rate of the watch.
      I don’t know what the regulator pins themselves are made of, but the hairspring and escapement are silicon. The balance wheel has adjustable weights for timing and poising, but it is not freesprung.

  • @apars78
    @apars78 Месяц назад

    Hi Bill, Thanks for this the GO Caliber 58-08 has a quick reset function which they have used in lower end watches too. Oh and the GO Cal-100 too

    • @watchartsci
      @watchartsci  28 дней назад

      Thanks for the info Apars! Take care, Bill

  • @TimG--
    @TimG-- Месяц назад +3

    Anything w Swatch is s Hard Pass !!! Even Brequet……. Nice content Bill 🥃

    • @watchartsci
      @watchartsci  28 дней назад

      Unfortunately, Tim. Have to dig out a Daniel Roth from an 80's Breguet. Take care, Bill

  • @obesetuna3164
    @obesetuna3164 Месяц назад +1

    Hi Bill. For now at least, Glashutte seems to be keeping itself aloof from the grand machinations of that evil Swatch monster. The Omega Speciality looks excellent. But the more basic de-Viiles, and also the Sixties from Glashutte, are the kind of quality, everyday, obtainable watches that appeal more to my taste.

    • @watchartsci
      @watchartsci  28 дней назад +1

      Maybe some brainiac at Swatch realizes that silicon hairsprings and the elegant swan neck regulators don't work together, Tuna. Take care, Bill

  • @juniorjohnson5961
    @juniorjohnson5961 Месяц назад

    Love the SeaQ ... Thanks Bill !

    • @juniorjohnson5961
      @juniorjohnson5961 Месяц назад +1

      My Sea- Gull 1963 has a Swan neck regulator

    • @watchartsci
      @watchartsci  28 дней назад

      Yes, some GOs do! Nice going Junior! Take care, Bill

  • @rcharm1378
    @rcharm1378 Месяц назад

    Thx Bill for sharing. I was surprised you started off with chronograph😂 It is becoming more difficult to spot which models GO uses silicon hairspring.

    • @watchartsci
      @watchartsci  Месяц назад

      It gets to the point where a brand has been so 'Swatchized' Raymond, that I just don't look anymore. GO has lots of great watches with swan-neck regulators... that means no silicon. Take care, Bill

  • @donculp9094
    @donculp9094 Месяц назад

    I had a new moon watch back in 1973 and want to replace it but don't know if there was more than one movement in that watch then.

  • @clivebroadhead4857
    @clivebroadhead4857 28 дней назад +1

    Perhaps you are missing the point. Swatch design enabled robotics to produce functional watches at an affordable price = market domination = demise of what is considered valuable..Also 600m is not a serious depth unless you are at 600m. That they still produce these anachronisms shows a dedication to craft and a mastery of marketing (something Swatch has in abundance).

    • @watchartsci
      @watchartsci  27 дней назад

      Clive, I didn't get into watch collection to marvel at how robotics and smart machines increased profitability and lowered prices for cheap watches. (Before I retired I did everything from creating interfaces for robots to programming iPhones.) With watch collection, we have many avenues, and the one that I have chosen involves traditional, even archaic mechanisms for keeping time. To invoke names like 'Breguet' is to imply the craftsmanship, materials and traditions going back to before the French Revolution. Adding silicon hairsprings is equivalent to giving up on those traditions-why not just stick in a quartz or digital mechanism? So, no, I did not miss the point. I got it, and I don't like it. Take care, Bill

    • @clivebroadhead4857
      @clivebroadhead4857 26 дней назад +1

      The point though no doubt clumsily made was one of the irony that the high tech production of utilitarian watches has led to the preservation of traditional watchmaking methods as a means of further developing and maintaining a luxury market for the excess product of highly specced timepieces.
      Irony is a concept lost or not understood by some in your part of the world. 'He may look like an idiot and talk like an idiot but don't let that fool you. He really is an idiot.' as spoken by Groucho Marx in relation to Chiccolini in Duck Soup is an example of non irony.
      When I think of the history of mechanical horology longitude is the word foremost in mind rather than the manufacture of baubles be they exquisite time pieces or the various luxury good denoting prestige on their possessors in the French aristocracy. The development of automata at that time could be considered far more fascinating to some and served a similar purpose. @@watchartsci

  • @nizarmurar
    @nizarmurar Месяц назад +1

    Many thanks Bill . Very interesting issue.
    Talking about Lemania 1873 ,pls see what the Italian micro brand Venezianico executed, with 70 restored pcs of Lemania 1873.
    With love and deep appreciation
    Nizar

    • @HRM.H
      @HRM.H Месяц назад

      Venezianico is renown for scamming and misstreating its customers...

    • @watchartsci
      @watchartsci  28 дней назад +1

      Hi Nizar, yes, V. has done some interesting watches with Lemania 1873. Take care, Bill

  • @donculp9094
    @donculp9094 Месяц назад

    Hi Bill , Do you happen to know when Omega stopped using the 320 movement in the moon watch ? Thanks man.

    • @rcharm1378
      @rcharm1378 Месяц назад +1

      I guess you meant the 321 movement. I think it was either 67 or 68 the 321 was replaced by 861 and shortly after that it landed on the Moon. But it was the 321 which was the version approved by NASA though.

    • @HRM.H
      @HRM.H Месяц назад

      They still use a updated version of the 321 today... only in the "Ed White" version tho.

    • @watchartsci
      @watchartsci  Месяц назад

      Hi Don, I sort of gave up on Omega ever since Swatch started stuffing silicon hairsprings in them. I thought you could still get a 321 version of the Moon Watch. No? Take care, Bill

  • @9804216
    @9804216 Месяц назад

    I have a GO Panograph. It is my first proper timepiece that I got for myself to commemorate being a freelancer and managing to survive at that. That was 14 years ago.
    Fast forward to end of 2023 and I have to say I'm extremely disappointed in GO and Swatch in general. I sent in my watch for servicing and they shipped it to HK. Three months later it came back and the counter function wasn't working as it should. Had to send it back to HK again and wait another three months.
    How the watch left the service centre without the counter function being checked is to me a huge failure on their end. All that was offered to me was a pretty generic apology, still charged me full price for service and to add insult to injury told me they'd give me a 10% discount on a new factory leather strap.
    And thanks to that really bad experience, I have now lost quite bit of sentimental value for the watch. Lost respect for the brand as well as Swatch.

    • @watchartsci
      @watchartsci  27 дней назад +1

      Wow Ong! What a mess! Sorry that you had such a bad experience with your Pano. Take care, man, Bill

  • @ScottyCan-t
    @ScottyCan-t Месяц назад

    Speedy, SeaQ, Senator. But I like them all!😁

    • @watchartsci
      @watchartsci  Месяц назад +1

      Scotty, my picks too, but I've also always had a liking of the Seamaster. Take care, Bill

  • @cesarrocha3138
    @cesarrocha3138 Месяц назад +1

    Bill how are you?

    • @watchartsci
      @watchartsci  Месяц назад

      I'm fine,Cesar, why? Take care, Bill

  • @cesarrocha3138
    @cesarrocha3138 Месяц назад +1

    Count down?

    • @watchartsci
      @watchartsci  Месяц назад

      Cesar, you're getting strange... count down to what? Take care, Bill

  • @obud3777
    @obud3777 Месяц назад +1

    Swatch group has 7 million watches in stock, Swatch has destroyed Omega by selling plastic MoonSwatch branded as Omega! They just won’t learn how to do marketing right! And now they also destroyed Blancpain, with Swatch plastic Fifty Fathoms 🤮

    • @watchartsci
      @watchartsci  28 дней назад +1

      Omega isn't the only Swatch casualty, O'bud...Breguet, Blancpain and any other watch with a history before Swatch took over. Take care, Bill

    • @obud3777
      @obud3777 28 дней назад

      @@watchartsci So true Bill, so true!

  • @HRM.H
    @HRM.H Месяц назад +1

    Omega has lost the plot, they are asking almost 50.000 USD for a simple time-only sportswatch... The movement's bridges are made off titanium, but that still doesnt warrent the price in my opinion. Thats about double the price of a solid gold Chopard L.U.C. Alpine Eagle... 😂

    • @watchartsci
      @watchartsci  28 дней назад

      The easiest way to get the price of those Omegas lower is not to pay that price. Take care, Bill