Non c’è che dire. La musica di’ Haydn, nelle mani dei grandi direttori acquista un sapore straordinario e meraviglioso. Si ritorno al gusto delle incisioni datate.
The composer’s name is *Joseph Haydn.* Not sure who you think ‘Franz’ is, but I presume you mean the great friend of Johannes Chrisostomus Wolfgangus Theophilus Mozart. In the case of both composers, the extra names are Catholic baptismal names and were never used by either composer in their entire lifetimes - ever. Referring to Haydn as ‘Franz’ is as odd as referring to Mozart as listed above, nobody ever did then, and neither should we today.
@@elaineblackhurst1509 It's me talking like I'm buddy with ole Franz... I call him occasionally "daddy" H (you know him being "papa" and all... I'm just being as buddy with him there as well - even if he would have like it or not - it's lovingly done yet the same).
@@ExtrackterYT That’s cool, except that Haydn was never called ‘Franz’ in his entire lifetime by anyone, so it’s a mystery why you should choose so to do; do you refer to Mozart as Jo ?
I thought prior that I hated this symphony for its simplicity, but upon re-listening with an open mind, I actually really like this. Hate towards any music is really just ignorance or lack of willingness to understand.
This symphony is so far from being simple. 2 examples. The main theme from mvt 1 uses a brahmsian technique where the motif is incorporated into both the front and the back of the melody. The iterations of the main theme themselves follow a rondo form, where the main motif is incorporated into a different orchestral tutti melody everytime it is played. Its as detailed as it is subtle
@@sgwinenoob2115 Yeah, it's unfortunate though because most people think like how I have thought a year back. That's why people are so harsh to obscure music, and say classical era music is boring. It's all ignorance that can only be removed by looking a little closer openly. Funny enough, that same time I saw this as simple, I thought Rite of Spring was horrible. Now I find Gubaidulina - De Profundis beautiful.
Where Haydn is seemingly simplistic, one needs to watch out! He is a joker par excellence, and loves to make fun even of his audiences! - By the way, Haydn (so underrated in comparison to his fellow genius Mozart) has an extremely discreet gift even Mozart did not have to that degree: His music is totally comforting, ever witty, ever inducing a smile and sense of relief. This is wisdom! But then, Mozart already died at not even 36 years of age...
wait, have you done it and implying that a girl has spat thoust coffee out or are you implying that you would do it and a girl would spat thoust coffee out?
@@eren7350 girl spit out her Hazelnut Macchiato non-fat foam all over the place!!! Everyone was in shock but I started to giggle the shake laugh and everyone joined in. She was mortified but later saw the humor. She even referred to it during a concert report.
Some of the dynamics in a modern interpretation (like this one) are WAY different from the original score (which is seen on video here). For example, the loud sudden drum roll in the 4th movement is actually written as a slow cresc. from ppp, not a sudden attack. Then in the measure AFTER what is played as a loud roll, is written a single forte beat. That (later) beat is the only thing that is actually written as forte.
М.С.Казинник,Вы сумели заинтересовать меня и теперь слушаю с удовольствием и благодарностью всё подряд,это такой необъятный и непостижимый источник БЛАГОДАТИ.
Haydn’s biographer Griesinger who knew the composer well asked Haydn about this during the visits he made to him in the ten years before his death whilst gathering material; it’s an urban myth. The newspaper reports, along with Haydn’s own words are clear that there was huge applause after the first movement, and Haydn mentions ‘…countless Bravos’; in other words, the chances of anyone being asleep are next to zero. In fact, Griesinger asks Haydn specifically whether or not he had composed the Andante to waken the sleeping English audience: Haydn replied: ‘No, but I was interested in surprising the public with something new, and in making a brilliant debut…’* The less reliable Dies in his contemporary biography does peddle the sleeping audience story in his usual chatty style, but it is Griesinger who tells us the truth. * Many of the ‘London’ symphonies have these novel special effects, so the ‘Surprise’ symphony is not alone in having one (or more); the keyboard solo written for himself in the finale of Symphony 98, the percussion in Symphony 100, or the opening drum roll in Symphony 103 - and it’s unexpected return later in the first movement - are some of the more obvious examples.
You’re just like me, currently I’m a sophomore but start off by digging through baroque. You’ll then progress through classical with more knowledge and soon romantic and late romantic. You’ll soon discover more composers and have an appreciation for classical music 🤝🤝🤝
@@miarozvadska3962 The trick is to stop listening to low quality music if possible (e.g. commercial music played in supermarkets), trying to ignore it, and wash your brain, which is used to low quality sounds: train your ear to appreciate first the beauty of the sound of a vibrating string and other instruments, expecially trying to appreciate when they are played well, then the beauty of a good harmonization, and finally you will naturally appreciate a more complex structure, like a string quartet or a classical symphony.
A Classical period Symphony by Haydn. Movement 3 is a Minuet and Trio. Movement 4 is a Rondo. Minuet form is: A (Minuet) |: a :||: b a’:| B (Trio) |: c :||: d c’:| A (Minuet) a b a' Minuets have Triple Meter (emphasis every third beat) and a moderate tempo. Rondo form is: A B A C A or A B A C A B A or A B A C A D A
@@seahorse0009, well Nikolaus I was dead before Josef wrote this. Prince Anton *needed* waking up since he dismissed most of Haydn's musicians from Esterhazy Palace and saw less significance in having the composer there, hence Haydn's successful tenure in England (Anton's loss, England's gain!). After Anton died, Nikolaus II essentially asked Haydn if he wanted his old job back. So yes, at least one of them eventually woke up :D
Some symphonic works, like Mahler's 3rd, last 100 minutes or so. Many Haydn's symphonies last around 20 minutes. What's more, Mahler's symphonies are written for many more instruments, Haydn's scores are much simpler, even if you won't consider the length.
Haydn is from the classical era, where symphonies were written as compositional studies/practice instead of personal expression (like in the romantic era). That's why these symphonies are much shorter, much simpler, and much smaller in scale. Symphonic composers of the classical era wrote way more symphonies than composers from the romantic era, like Mahler and Tchaikovsky because they were much easier to write. They thought of them like writing an essay, instead of pouring your heart out into a piece of art, like what Mahler and Tchaikovsky did later. I'm not dissing on the quality of Haydn's symphonies at all though. I love these, but as far as style and form goes, they are virtually incomparable to the symphonies of the romantic era.
The reason for this surprise movement is that Haydn hated to see his listeners falling asleep during slow movements. Haydn's music is humorous and Beethoven's it's dramatic.
Haydn's wit and high spirited nature could be at odds with the Romantics. So too his finals. The Romantics often favored weighty and expansive finals Haydn favored the light, brilliant and usually concise.. Instead of weight, there is quicksilver intensity. A lesson Mozart learned and one Beethoven never forgot, even with the Ninth. Verdi, an admirer of Haydn,, mastered it, especially with Falstaff.
Symphony no. 94 is considered one of the best from Haydn's symphonic works. It topped the standings in BBC poll. In Talk Classical's poll, no. 94 took 2nd place ahead of no.103 and behind no.104, the last and the best.
Polls might tell you something about popularity, or about how well-known a particular work might be; polls such as those you mention have absolutely nothing to do with a qualitative judgement and are NOT a yardstick by which to judge ‘best’.
@@elaineblackhurst1509 Obviously this is arts that we're commenting on, but I don't find much value in the statement that one cannot measure the quality of different works. I think it's worth pointing out what is generally considered better. It doesn't mean that something is objectively better, but what is widely considered as more appealing. For arts, you may argue that any judgment is somewhat flawed, but if you discard any popular polls, you basically say that there's no good way to compare different artistic works.
@@theodentherenewed4785 Your reply here seems to bear little relation to my comment; a popular poll may well rank MacDonalds above something from a Michelin starred restaurant, but that does not mean that a Big Mac is ‘best’.
@@elaineblackhurst1509 To put is simply, in your example, it is ultimately you who says that this doesn't make McDonalds better than the Michelin-decorated restaurant. If the respondents are asked which one they consider the best, the poll says specifically what the statistical population considers as the best. It's a valuable information, if you think that you know better than the people polled, you can hold such a view, but I say that there's more information of interest in what a group says. No matter what a distinguished expert that person may be. In mean this specifically in the fields, in which the personal tastes have a unavoidable bearing on the result. In music or in a food industry, there's no one objective way of measuring the quality, therefore the mean of subjective opinions is the way, in which different creations are compared against each other.
@@theodentherenewed4785 I agree with vey little of your interesting comment - but that’s my problem; thanks for sharing your thoughts. Qualitative judgements that are objective, in both cooking and music - and most other things - *are* possible; food created by professional chefs is the product of mastering a wide range of skills, something that can only be done after long training and practice along with a creative, and artistic imagination. This puts a Michelin starred chef’s food some way above a basic wage earning, student part-time employee, with minimal training, heating up burgers, or putting fries in the fryer.* Similarly with music, Mozart - rather heavy-handedly - makes my point: the ‘Jupiter’ symphony (K551) is clearly, measurably, and objectively superior to Ein musikalischer Spass (K522). Subjectivity only comes into it if someone prefers a string quartet by Gyrowetz to one by Haydn, or a symphony by Eberl to one by Beethoven, and if people prefer the Gyrowetz and Eberl to Haydn or Beethoven - that’s cool. However, the Haydn quartet, or Beethoven symphony, are indubitably superior by any and every qualitative measurement and judgement. Whilst in all these cases, ‘best’ can easily be demonstrated; ‘favourite’ is a different matter, and in the case of both music and food, is no business of myself or anyone else. * I realise that this sounds very snobby, and is not intended to be; the burger chains are fantastically successful world-wide, and I enjoy it as much as anyone.
I stumbled across this song during the second movement when I first heard of it in elementary school during music class with the cymbals crash on loud parts. The second movement is a catchy one.
@@pengu1nmusic The humorous part in this symphony is the "Surprise" second movement, which derives its nickname. Haydn hated his listeners falling asleep during slow movements, so he wrote a "Surprise" to awake them. It was done for comic effect, unlike Beethoven, who uses fortissimo shock chords for dramatic effect.
@@rodrigosamuelguinis717 You’ve completely mis-read the situation here; it is categorically *not* intended to be comical or humorous, and the story about lulling people to sleep is apocryphal nonsense which when asked about it, Haydn *denied* unequivocally. (Griesinger biography, Gotwals English translation: page 33).
Gasp! Heavy breathing...... recovering............ I......... I was so surprised at the beginning of the second movement.... I dont think this music should be legal. I mean what of the older listeners? Still recovering............ my goodness............ sits down.....
Check out the biographies of Haydn by Griesinger and Dies, both of whom visited Haydn often during the last years of his life gathering material for their forthcoming lives of the composer, both of which were published in 1810 - the year after Haydn’s death. Both biographers asked specifically about this symphony, so if interested, you can find out.
@@kevindevine6780 Unless you speak German, the book you need is the excellent English translation of the two biographies by Georg August Griesinger, and Albert Christoph Dies by Vernon Gotwals entitled: *Joseph Haydn: Eighteenth-century Gentleman and Genius.* Published in 1963, Gotwals translations are essential reading as both authors visited Haydn frequently during the last ten years or so of his life; Griesinger is probably more reliable,* knew Haydn longer, and is about half the length of Dies who is more chatty, more fanciful, though his arrangement of chapters into 1st visit, 2nd visit and so on I think works well. * Just one example: Griesinger nails the Surprise symphony nonsense very well by asking Haydn outright about the ‘surprise’ and getting a straight coherent answer; Dies peddles a load of apocryphal urban myth-making.
Why - when Haydn was specifically asked about this sleeping audience being woken up story - and he categorically DENIED that that was the intention, is this ridiculous and entirely spurious story constantly being re-cycled ? Fact: at none of Haydn’s concert series in London 1791 and 1792, then again in 1794 and 1795 was there any chance whatsoever of anyone going to sleep; they were the hottest tickets in town and there would have been as much chance of someone going to sleep as there would at a …… (fill in your own) concert today. Utterly ridiculous.
@@elaineblackhurst1509 You really think I believe people slept in Haydn's concerts?You really went out of your way to bring in historical evidence to a joke.
@@herpyderpy2869 Good point; I think my problem is that more than most composers, Haydn is stuck with a baggage of apocryphal and spurious nonsense to a degree that afflicts no other great composer, and it detracts from - in this case - a very fine symphony, and more generally, trivialises and undermines the reputation of a very great composer. Nobody would ever dream of suggesting that the opening of Beethoven 5 was conceived by the composer to wake up a dozing audience and let them know that the work was beginning, simply because it is too stupid for words, yet we merrily mis-apply these silly stories to Haydn. In almost all his later symphonies - from the ‘Paris’ set onwards - Haydn strove to build in novel effects into each of his symphonies, such as the French folk song into the slow movement of 85, the false ending in 90, the keyboard solo into the finale of 98, the military percussion in the slow and the final movements of 100, the timpani opening into 103, and so forth. The loud chord here in 94 comes from the same source - it is a special effect, conceived to be memorable, and ensure that in the competitive market of London concert life at the time, that the audiences and newspapers talked about Haydn, not rivals like Pleyel who had been appointed to direct the Professional Concerts series in London for the 1791/92 season in direct competition with the Salomon/Haydn concerts. You’re quite right though, I do sometimes miss jokes, even when written in my own language!
Superb piece. Score error though, at 9:45 . At the 6th measure Violins and flutes have written G C E, when the final note should be D instead of E. Wouldnt have figured this oout if I wasn`t trying to play along with my keyboard lol.
Detective Home I have seen worse with their parts for Beethoven’s Fifth Symphony, those parts have too many or too few rests for all the instruments to end where they are supposed to in the exposition of the first movement.
Hi David ! Thanks 2 show me what real Music is !!! I know a Very Talented Guitar in Scotland & I need him ! 2 give Melodys ! Lol I Can hum them but need Musitions 2 Interpret !!lol Again ! Much Love Everlasting 🎻🎶🎼💝☺
What a treat! On Haydn's birthday today, too! Great finesse among players and, IMHO, correct tempi throughout. I think I had an LP of this decades ago! Thanks for uploading.
6:07 Think there may be a mistake in the score... The second last measure, it sounds like the string are playing that B in 8th notes like they did in the 3rd last measure. According to the score, they just sustain the B?
It is a combination of rondo and sonata form. There is a distinct second theme first in the dominant and in the reprise in the tonic. Haydn frequently experimented with free forms and combinations of forms.
0:00 I. Adagio - Vivace assai
8:25 II. Andante
14:12 III. Menuetto: Allegro molto
19:44 IV. Finale: Allegro molto
C'est quoi la datation de la musique
Thanks
1. 00:00 adagio- vivace assai X, adagio cantavile
This was one of those works I studied when I was 12 or so to understand sonats form. Deceptively simple is old papa Haydn!
@@vibe971star 1785? Approx
Non c’è che dire. La musica di’ Haydn, nelle mani dei grandi direttori acquista un sapore straordinario e meraviglioso. Si ritorno al gusto delle incisioni datate.
The second movement has a REALLY catchy theme. I had it stuck in my head for years trying to find the source until I randomly stumbled across it
Finally! A video of the WHOLE symphony! I'm SURPRISED this hasn't been done earlier. (Thanks, you just earned a new sub!)
The flow, energy, elegance, wit, humour, joviality and intelligence in Franz' music is something healthy to be exposed to.
The composer’s name is *Joseph Haydn.*
Not sure who you think ‘Franz’ is, but I presume you mean the great friend of Johannes Chrisostomus Wolfgangus Theophilus Mozart.
In the case of both composers, the extra names are Catholic baptismal names and were never used by either composer in their entire lifetimes - ever.
Referring to Haydn as ‘Franz’ is as odd as referring to Mozart as listed above, nobody ever did then, and neither should we today.
@@elaineblackhurst1509 It's me talking like I'm buddy with ole Franz... I call him occasionally "daddy" H (you know him being "papa" and all... I'm just being as buddy with him there as well - even if he would have like it or not - it's lovingly done yet the same).
@@ExtrackterYT
That’s cool, except that Haydn was never called ‘Franz’ in his entire lifetime by anyone, so it’s a mystery why you should choose so to do; do you refer to Mozart as Jo ?
I thought prior that I hated this symphony for its simplicity, but upon re-listening with an open mind, I actually really like this. Hate towards any music is really just ignorance or lack of willingness to understand.
This symphony is so far from being simple. 2 examples. The main theme from mvt 1 uses a brahmsian technique where the motif is incorporated into both the front and the back of the melody. The iterations of the main theme themselves follow a rondo form, where the main motif is incorporated into a different orchestral tutti melody everytime it is played. Its as detailed as it is subtle
@@sgwinenoob2115 Yeah, it's unfortunate though because most people think like how I have thought a year back. That's why people are so harsh to obscure music, and say classical era music is boring. It's all ignorance that can only be removed by looking a little closer openly. Funny enough, that same time I saw this as simple, I thought Rite of Spring was horrible. Now I find Gubaidulina - De Profundis beautiful.
Hate towards any music is ignorance? Dude have you listened to Sonic Spinball Main Theme? Please do, you will surely change your mind.
@@eren7350 I was focusing on genres, so the only way your argument would work is if you said game music sucks, which wouldn't change my mind
Where Haydn is seemingly simplistic, one needs to watch out! He is a joker par excellence, and loves to make fun even of his audiences! - By the way, Haydn (so underrated in comparison to his fellow genius Mozart) has an extremely discreet gift even Mozart did not have to that degree: His music is totally comforting, ever witty, ever inducing a smile and sense of relief. This is wisdom! But then, Mozart already died at not even 36 years of age...
I would play the second movement for my 800 Music Appreciation classes. One girl spit her coffee out.
wait, have you done it and implying that a girl has spat thoust coffee out or are you implying that you would do it and a girl would spat thoust coffee out?
@@eren7350 girl spit out her Hazelnut Macchiato non-fat foam all over the place!!! Everyone was in shock but I started to giggle the shake laugh and everyone joined in. She was mortified but later saw the humor. She even referred to it during a concert report.
@@RTCMAHL oof that was insane.
8:25 I got surprised, even though I saw the fortissimo coming.
i expect that to be very loud, but not THAT LOUD
Idk what would it sound if it was fortississimo
wtf SAMMEEEe it was so LOUD >>
Some of the dynamics in a modern interpretation (like this one) are WAY different from the original score (which is seen on video here). For example, the loud sudden drum roll in the 4th movement is actually written as a slow cresc. from ppp, not a sudden attack. Then in the measure AFTER what is played as a loud roll, is written a single forte beat. That (later) beat is the only thing that is actually written as forte.
М.С.Казинник,Вы сумели заинтересовать меня и теперь слушаю с удовольствием и благодарностью всё подряд,это такой необъятный и непостижимый источник БЛАГОДАТИ.
Others: Listen to classical music while sleeping
Person: *listens to this while sleeping*
Fortissimo: hello wake tf up
Huh? What was that? Thunder? Something woke me up.
rachmaninoff symphony no 1 will also scare u
@@fredericchopin6445 I like your music
The audience: (sleeping in Andante movement)
Haydn: Take it you all !!
Haydn’s biographer Griesinger who knew the composer well asked Haydn about this during the visits he made to him in the ten years before his death whilst gathering material; it’s an urban myth.
The newspaper reports, along with Haydn’s own words are clear that there was huge applause after the first movement, and Haydn mentions ‘…countless Bravos’; in other words, the chances of anyone being asleep are next to zero.
In fact, Griesinger asks Haydn specifically whether or not he had composed the Andante to waken the sleeping English audience:
Haydn replied:
‘No, but I was interested in surprising the public with something new, and in making a brilliant debut…’*
The less reliable Dies in his contemporary biography does peddle the sleeping audience story in his usual chatty style, but it is Griesinger who tells us the truth.
* Many of the ‘London’ symphonies have these novel special effects, so the ‘Surprise’ symphony is not alone in having one (or more); the keyboard solo written for himself in the finale of Symphony 98, the percussion in Symphony 100, or the opening drum roll in Symphony 103 - and it’s unexpected return later in the first movement - are some of the more obvious examples.
I'm a 7th grader with almost no clue about how music works on a structural level, but this nearly gave me a heart attack serveral times.
This is great
I am 6th grader, who is playing piano 5th year, but still not listening with interest.
I'm Mister Me Seeks! Look at me-e!
You’re just like me, currently I’m a sophomore but start off by digging through baroque. You’ll then progress through classical with more knowledge and soon romantic and late romantic. You’ll soon discover more composers and have an appreciation for classical music 🤝🤝🤝
@@miarozvadska3962 same. I could fall asleep listening to this xd
@@miarozvadska3962 The trick is to stop listening to low quality music if possible (e.g. commercial music played in supermarkets), trying to ignore it, and wash your brain, which is used to low quality sounds: train your ear to appreciate first the beauty of the sound of a vibrating string and other instruments, expecially trying to appreciate when they are played well, then the beauty of a good harmonization, and finally you will naturally appreciate a more complex structure, like a string quartet or a classical symphony.
I love how you synced the end cards and the last two chords together
A Classical period Symphony by Haydn. Movement 3 is a Minuet and Trio. Movement 4 is a Rondo.
Minuet form is:
A (Minuet)
|: a :||: b a’:|
B (Trio)
|: c :||: d c’:|
A (Minuet)
a b a'
Minuets have Triple Meter (emphasis every third beat) and a moderate tempo.
Rondo form is:
A B A C A
or
A B A C A B A
or
A B A C A D A
Georg Solti is the MAN. I love this piece. The slow movement and its hilarity still gets me.
I hope that Haydn succesfully woke up the prince :)
@@seahorse0009, well Nikolaus I was dead before Josef wrote this. Prince Anton *needed* waking up since he dismissed most of Haydn's musicians from Esterhazy Palace and saw less significance in having the composer there, hence Haydn's successful tenure in England (Anton's loss, England's gain!). After Anton died, Nikolaus II essentially asked Haydn if he wanted his old job back. So yes, at least one of them eventually woke up :D
Why does this guy have so much symphonies? How does this guy have composed so much symphonies? Like, bruh.
Like, bruh.
The curse of the ninth didn't exist yet.
AJ Pascual Also because classical symphonies were much more short and concise in length and instrumentation
Some symphonic works, like Mahler's 3rd, last 100 minutes or so. Many Haydn's symphonies last around 20 minutes. What's more, Mahler's symphonies are written for many more instruments, Haydn's scores are much simpler, even if you won't consider the length.
Haydn is from the classical era, where symphonies were written as compositional studies/practice instead of personal expression (like in the romantic era). That's why these symphonies are much shorter, much simpler, and much smaller in scale. Symphonic composers of the classical era wrote way more symphonies than composers from the romantic era, like Mahler and Tchaikovsky because they were much easier to write. They thought of them like writing an essay, instead of pouring your heart out into a piece of art, like what Mahler and Tchaikovsky did later.
I'm not dissing on the quality of Haydn's symphonies at all though. I love these, but as far as style and form goes, they are virtually incomparable to the symphonies of the romantic era.
Bruh! I was scared that I was gonna lose my shits in the second movement where the surprise hits you, I didn't even bloody notice it!
Bruh!
The reason for this surprise movement is that Haydn hated to see his listeners falling asleep during slow movements. Haydn's music is humorous and Beethoven's it's dramatic.
Haydn's wit and high spirited nature could be at odds with the Romantics. So too his finals. The Romantics often favored weighty and expansive finals Haydn favored the light, brilliant and usually concise.. Instead of weight, there is quicksilver intensity. A lesson Mozart learned and one Beethoven never forgot, even with the Ninth. Verdi, an admirer of Haydn,, mastered it, especially with Falstaff.
Sir Georg Solti leading an orchestra is always a hit!!
8:56 never fails to not surprise me even when I know it’s coming
It's because it is so carefully arranged. 😀
Best Lullaby Ever!!
Yeah, "lullaby"... 8:56
Symphony no. 94 is considered one of the best from Haydn's symphonic works. It topped the standings in BBC poll. In Talk Classical's poll, no. 94 took 2nd place ahead of no.103 and behind no.104, the last and the best.
Polls might tell you something about popularity, or about how well-known a particular work might be; polls such as those you mention have absolutely nothing to do with a qualitative judgement and are NOT a yardstick by which to judge ‘best’.
@@elaineblackhurst1509 Obviously this is arts that we're commenting on, but I don't find much value in the statement that one cannot measure the quality of different works. I think it's worth pointing out what is generally considered better. It doesn't mean that something is objectively better, but what is widely considered as more appealing. For arts, you may argue that any judgment is somewhat flawed, but if you discard any popular polls, you basically say that there's no good way to compare different artistic works.
@@theodentherenewed4785
Your reply here seems to bear little relation to my comment; a popular poll may well rank MacDonalds above something from a Michelin starred restaurant, but that does not mean that a Big Mac is ‘best’.
@@elaineblackhurst1509 To put is simply, in your example, it is ultimately you who says that this doesn't make McDonalds better than the Michelin-decorated restaurant. If the respondents are asked which one they consider the best, the poll says specifically what the statistical population considers as the best. It's a valuable information, if you think that you know better than the people polled, you can hold such a view, but I say that there's more information of interest in what a group says. No matter what a distinguished expert that person may be. In mean this specifically in the fields, in which the personal tastes have a unavoidable bearing on the result. In music or in a food industry, there's no one objective way of measuring the quality, therefore the mean of subjective opinions is the way, in which different creations are compared against each other.
@@theodentherenewed4785
I agree with vey little of your interesting comment - but that’s my problem; thanks for sharing your thoughts.
Qualitative judgements that are objective, in both cooking and music - and most other things - *are* possible; food created by professional chefs is the product of mastering a wide range of skills, something that can only be done after long training and practice along with a creative, and artistic imagination.
This puts a Michelin starred chef’s food some way above a basic wage earning, student part-time employee, with minimal training, heating up burgers, or putting fries in the fryer.*
Similarly with music, Mozart - rather heavy-handedly - makes my point: the ‘Jupiter’ symphony (K551) is clearly, measurably, and objectively superior to Ein musikalischer Spass (K522).
Subjectivity only comes into it if someone prefers a string quartet by Gyrowetz to one by Haydn, or a symphony by Eberl to one by Beethoven, and if people prefer the Gyrowetz and Eberl to Haydn or Beethoven - that’s cool.
However, the Haydn quartet, or Beethoven symphony, are indubitably superior by any and every qualitative measurement and judgement.
Whilst in all these cases, ‘best’ can easily be demonstrated; ‘favourite’ is a different matter, and in the case of both music and food, is no business of myself or anyone else.
* I realise that this sounds very snobby, and is not intended to be; the burger chains are fantastically successful world-wide, and I enjoy it as much as anyone.
Well the RUclips ad is much more “surprising” as it comes out right before the surprising moment in the 2nd movement…
00:00 1. Adagio - Vivace assai (G major)
08:25 2. Andante (C major) 변주곡 형식
14:12 3. Menuetto: Allegro molto (G major)
19:44 4. Finale: Allegro molto (G major)
0:00
Tp 1:36
Ts 2:36
C 2:53
Слава ТВОРЦУ. Михаил Семёнович Казиннк,Вы просто ВОЛШЕБНИК.Уважаю и благодарю за труд по нашему пробуждению.
I stumbled across this song during the second movement when I first heard of it in elementary school during music class with the cymbals crash on loud parts. The second movement is a catchy one.
8:57 is it still a surprise if we can see the fortissimo for every instrument? lmao
I really enjoyed this piece Haydn Symphony No 94, and I am looking forward to hearing it performed in Armagh on the 24th of June .
That was both beautiful and hilarious!
Well, Haydn WAS a practical joker, so...
How the hell can music be 'hilarious'?
@@pengu1nmusic who said it can't?
@@pengu1nmusic The humorous part in this symphony is the "Surprise" second movement, which derives its nickname. Haydn hated his listeners falling asleep during slow movements, so he wrote a "Surprise" to awake them. It was done for comic effect, unlike Beethoven, who uses fortissimo shock chords for dramatic effect.
@@rodrigosamuelguinis717
You’ve completely mis-read the situation here; it is categorically *not* intended to be comical or humorous, and the story about lulling people to sleep is apocryphal nonsense which when asked about it, Haydn *denied* unequivocally.
(Griesinger biography, Gotwals English translation: page 33).
The andante movement is perhaps Hadyn's best composition in his career.
Listening to this while I work on an essay about Haydn :)
Gasp! Heavy breathing...... recovering............ I......... I was so surprised at the beginning of the second movement.... I dont think this music should be legal. I mean what of the older listeners? Still recovering............ my goodness............ sits down.....
It would be interesting to go back in time to talk to Herr Haydn about how he came to write this piece of work!!!
I think it just hit him.
Check out the biographies of Haydn by Griesinger and Dies, both of whom visited Haydn often during the last years of his life gathering material for their forthcoming lives of the composer, both of which were published in 1810 - the year after Haydn’s death.
Both biographers asked specifically about this symphony, so if interested, you can find out.
@@elaineblackhurst1509 Could you give me their first names please, not the techiest person in the world, it would be easier for me. Thank You].
@@kevindevine6780
Unless you speak German, the book you need is the excellent English translation of the two biographies by Georg August Griesinger, and Albert Christoph Dies by Vernon Gotwals entitled:
*Joseph Haydn: Eighteenth-century Gentleman and Genius.*
Published in 1963, Gotwals translations are essential reading as both authors visited Haydn frequently during the last ten years or so of his life; Griesinger is probably more reliable,* knew Haydn longer, and is about half the length of Dies who is more chatty, more fanciful, though his arrangement of chapters into 1st visit, 2nd visit and so on I think works well.
* Just one example: Griesinger nails the Surprise symphony nonsense very well by asking Haydn outright about the ‘surprise’ and getting a straight coherent answer; Dies peddles a load of apocryphal urban myth-making.
Thank You for the information!!@@elaineblackhurst1509
하이든 - 교향곡 [94번] [놀람]
93~104번의 런던 교향곡 카테고리에 포함
1악장 - 느린도입부 [adagio cantabile] → 빠른 부분 [vivace assai]
악보 봐놓기
2악장 악보
Glorious. Just simply amazing.
8:25
9:28
10:27
11:29
12:28
Fantastic, listen to be swept away
Wonderful symphony
8:55 the first ever jumpscare.
At last i find whole symphony no 94!!!!❤️🙂🙏🙏👍👍👍
Hello fellow music students stuck in the cyclic hell that is Classical Compositions
i bid thee well traveler, the road is treacherous ahead
Person in the audience: *asleep*
Haydn: 8:25
Why - when Haydn was specifically asked about this sleeping audience being woken up story - and he categorically DENIED that that was the intention, is this ridiculous and entirely spurious story constantly being re-cycled ?
Fact: at none of Haydn’s concert series in London 1791 and 1792, then again in 1794 and 1795 was there any chance whatsoever of anyone going to sleep; they were the hottest tickets in town and there would have been as much chance of someone going to sleep as there would at a …… (fill in your own) concert today.
Utterly ridiculous.
@@elaineblackhurst1509 You really think I believe people slept in Haydn's concerts?You really went out of your way to bring in historical evidence to a joke.
@@herpyderpy2869
Good point; I think my problem is that more than most composers, Haydn is stuck with a baggage of apocryphal and spurious nonsense to a degree that afflicts no other great composer, and it detracts from - in this case - a very fine symphony, and more generally, trivialises and undermines the reputation of a very great composer.
Nobody would ever dream of suggesting that the opening of Beethoven 5 was conceived by the composer to wake up a dozing audience and let them know that the work was beginning, simply because it is too stupid for words, yet we merrily mis-apply these silly stories to Haydn.
In almost all his later symphonies - from the ‘Paris’ set onwards - Haydn strove to build in novel effects into each of his symphonies, such as the French folk song into the slow movement of 85, the false ending in 90, the keyboard solo into the finale of 98, the military percussion in the slow and the final movements of 100, the timpani opening into 103, and so forth.
The loud chord here in 94 comes from the same source - it is a special effect, conceived to be memorable, and ensure that in the competitive market of London concert life at the time, that the audiences and newspapers talked about Haydn, not rivals like Pleyel who had been appointed to direct the Professional Concerts series in London for the 1791/92 season in direct competition with the Salomon/Haydn concerts.
You’re quite right though, I do sometimes miss jokes, even when written in my own language!
Smile!
Sweet!
Sister!
Sadistic!
08:56
Superb piece. Score error though, at 9:45 . At the 6th measure Violins and flutes have written G C E, when the final note should be D instead of E. Wouldnt have figured this oout if I wasn`t trying to play along with my keyboard lol.
Damn it Breitkopf
Detective Home I have seen worse with their parts for Beethoven’s Fifth Symphony, those parts have too many or too few rests for all the instruments to end where they are supposed to in the exposition of the first movement.
8:57
Get ready for jumpscare
It's not a jump scare "surprise" if you warn them..
i miss my grandmother
same
u wrote that on rachmaninoff rhapsody in a theme of paganini too
Haydn writing this symphony: We do a little trolling.
Where is the website that has Leonard Bernstein conducting the Berlin Symphony? I also thought the last movement was more of a rondo?
5:50 chord progressions
13:44
18:51
8:55 Hehe look at that my heart exploded.
😂 my too
😂 his symphonies
makes me smile so
much!!!!
Hi David ! Thanks 2 show me what real Music is !!! I know a Very Talented Guitar in Scotland & I need him ! 2 give Melodys ! Lol I Can hum them but need Musitions 2 Interpret !!lol Again ! Much Love Everlasting 🎻🎶🎼💝☺
Masterpiece!
Numbers Nursery (5 Puppet Show)
On The Go (On Water 2)
The perfect gift when you wanna give a surprise to your girlfriend.
😂🎉
What a treat! On Haydn's birthday today, too! Great finesse among players and, IMHO, correct tempi throughout. I think I had an LP of this decades ago! Thanks for uploading.
Хороший звук.В других роликах 2часть почти не слышу,Надо было играть piano ,a нe pianissimo!
Kaway² mga grade 9 students HAHAHAHAHHA
hi fellow directioner and grade 9 student, wala akong nagegets dito 😭
@@azaleastylik6448 same HHAHAHAH
Wattsapp mga pilipino.may mga answer na ba kayo? Pa kopya😀
Hellooooo
wo für benötigt man so ein video
Haydn is a menace 💀
Anyone still continuously jumpscared by this piece and the first movement of Tchaikovsky's 6th?
6:07
Think there may be a mistake in the score...
The second last measure, it sounds like the string are playing that B in 8th notes like they did in the 3rd last measure. According to the score, they just sustain the B?
Benjamin Tsimialona the notation is a shorthand: the stem is crossed which indicates the note is supposed to be played as repeated 8th notes
@@oskarvonephesos you can call it as tremolo (repeated notes)
yeah, what they said
My favourite Haydn symphony. Unfortunately I’ve got no sound on my phone!
Wer dieseMusik liebt brauch keinen Nervenarzt
Concerto for first violin section
What form is the last mouvement? Is it rondo? 👍🙏🙂 Maybe somebody could help me 🙏🙏👍👍❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
It is a combination of rondo and sonata form. There is a distinct second theme first in the dominant and in the reprise in the tonic. Haydn frequently experimented with free forms and combinations of forms.
Alguien sabe cuantos compases son del min 8:25 y 14:12 por favor o si no repruebo la materia
Reprobaste?
I’m only listening to this because my music teacher put it in google classroom
Non credo in Solti( eccelso wagneriano, etc.) un interprete di Haydn.
minuto 9:53, quienes escucharon que en lugar de tocar, violines I y flautas sol -do- mi, tocaron sol -do - RE ???
Sí, es un error de la partitura.
Bellissimooooo
That build up from 22:46 to 22:43 .... EPIC!!!
I'm going to study to this, and i dont know this music... pray for me
From pianissimo to fortissimo 😂😂
School brought me here.
8:55
Nice!
minute 8:26 -8:58
Beaucoup de joie de vivre et pourtant, quel ennui Haydn distille à chaque fois...
1:34
Too many ads - bang in the middle of the music. Unwatchable. Removed from playlist.
La mia sinfonia preferita .
why add ads on a music video
Blame RUclips
Wer ist hier auch wegen Schule :I
Same
❤️
10:27
. The 4th also has humour like
The key change (21:38)
Wer schaut sich das auch nur wegem dem Unterricht an?
Ich bro XD
9:27 제1변주
10:26 제2변주
11:29 제3변주
12:27 제4변주
I play the andante part in piano
10:26 twinkle twinkle little star???🙄🤪
I got you 1k likes 👌
#violino
1:35 소나타형식 제시부 시작, 앞에는 느린 도입부.
8:56 *PIKACHU*
grüße gehen raus an den musik gk
B.- 19:57
Oh... was I supposed to be surprised... oh...