I am also 63 and just this week got detected with Gleason 6 (3+3) Group 1 Stage T1c prostate cancer, my PSA was 4.45 no nodule felt on examination, I am going to opt for active surveillance. but doing a genetic marker test before I take a decision. My biopsy was done anally not via the urethra and that is what I believe is the standard, Paul has (4+3) Group 3, (3+4) is group 2, strangely PSA was in the 1s! so probably caught very early then.With his surgery statistically very very low chance of Paul dying of this disease. But I understand his anxiety.
My PSA was 9. Free PSA % was .9% (way, way too low). MRI showed Pi-rad 4 lesions. Biopsy confirmed cancer, labeled as "extensive" due to 55% volume in one of the cores. PSMA PET/ CT scan showed no spread. Supposedly Gleason 6, but high volume is worrying. Doc recommends surgery. I'm 54.
@@jennnyandjeffs I was given to believe pure Gleason 6(3+3) does not metastasize. I too had a MRI Pi-rad 4, 1 lesion, . my 4K test free PSA ratio was 11%, . but that is all moot as the Gleason score trumps all of that but pathology can be subjective. I had just 1 core that came malignant positive 3+3, with 27% volume, Normally with PSA under 10 and Gleason 3+3 they say active surveillance is the way forward. If you had multiple cores positive, there maybe some chance that there could be undetected 3+4 (just my opinion) and your urologist is suggesting radical prostatectomy and is being cautious since your PET is clear. Difficult decision since removal of Prostate can come with some baggage, Either way your prognosis I believe is excellent, I hope all goes well good luck!.
The more men who share, the better. So many men don't get help when they have symptoms--even debilitating ones--and this man showed us that you don't have to have symptoms to have cancer. I hope others will take this as a sign and talk to their doctors if *anything* feels "off."
My experience was very similar. My doctor called me, which right away, told me ...this is not good. He said, "we have a problem." He then told me I probably had prostate cancer. It was like getting hit by a truck. I was in a daze for a couple of hours.
Yes sounds familiar, friend got his biopsy reviewed at Jons Hopkins and they moved the numbers ( Lower ) So that should be course of action. Hope you are doing well.
I’m kind of surprised there is not decision of focal therapy because he was looking for any alternative. However, I can see how some major institutions will push you in that direction. Though they do focal therapy at most, if not all institutions in the last 2-5 years.
Paul - my grandfather lived until age 93 over 20 years after diagnoses. Hang in there, Sir.✌🏼️
If you don't mind me asking, what procedure if any did your grandfather have?
You have given many men much hope by shaing your experience.
You can do surgery also after radiotion. It is more difficult, but can be done.
I am also 63 and just this week got detected with Gleason 6 (3+3) Group 1 Stage T1c prostate cancer, my PSA was 4.45 no nodule felt on examination, I am going to opt for active surveillance. but doing a genetic marker test before I take a decision. My biopsy was done anally not via the urethra and that is what I believe is the standard, Paul has (4+3) Group 3, (3+4) is group 2, strangely PSA was in the 1s! so probably caught very early then.With his surgery statistically very very low chance of Paul dying of this disease. But I understand his anxiety.
My PSA was 9. Free PSA % was .9% (way, way too low). MRI showed Pi-rad 4 lesions. Biopsy confirmed cancer, labeled as "extensive" due to 55% volume in one of the cores. PSMA PET/ CT scan showed no spread. Supposedly Gleason 6, but high volume is worrying. Doc recommends surgery. I'm 54.
@@jennnyandjeffs I was given to believe pure Gleason 6(3+3) does not metastasize. I too had a MRI Pi-rad 4, 1 lesion, . my 4K test free PSA ratio was 11%, . but that is all moot as the Gleason score trumps all of that but pathology can be subjective. I had just 1 core that came malignant positive 3+3, with 27% volume, Normally with PSA under 10 and Gleason 3+3 they say active surveillance is the way forward. If you had multiple cores positive, there maybe some chance that there could be undetected 3+4 (just my opinion) and your urologist is suggesting radical prostatectomy and is being cautious since your PET is clear. Difficult decision since removal of Prostate can come with some baggage, Either way your prognosis I believe is excellent, I hope all goes well good luck!.
Thanks for sharing
The more men who share, the better. So many men don't get help when they have symptoms--even debilitating ones--and this man showed us that you don't have to have symptoms to have cancer. I hope others will take this as a sign and talk to their doctors if *anything* feels "off."
My experience was very similar. My doctor called me, which right away, told me ...this is not good. He said, "we have a problem." He then told me I probably had prostate cancer. It was like getting hit by a truck. I was in a daze for a couple of hours.
Yes sounds familiar, friend got his biopsy reviewed at Jons Hopkins and they moved the numbers ( Lower ) So that should be course of action. Hope you are doing well.
I’m kind of surprised there is not decision of focal therapy because he was looking for any alternative. However, I can see how some major institutions will push you in that direction. Though they do focal therapy at most, if not all institutions in the last 2-5 years.
my PSA is through the roof but no cancer........can be caused simply by enlarged prostate
No biopsies through the urethra.
I would have thought your PSA would have been higher than 1 or 2 if you had a growth on your prostrate
Psa is a poor indicator of cancer and was never designed for that purpose to start with.
@mrofnocnon my psa was 9. They found cancer, 55% in one of the cores. I'm 54. 🤔
@@jennnyandjeffs In many cases high PSA is also caused by BPH or prostatitis. Cancer in only one core gives you lots of options.
@@mrofnocnon I had cancer in 4 cores, the highest was 55%.
@@jennnyandjeffs My own opinion is that Pca is usually slow growing giving you time to decide on your best options. God bless and best wishes.
Fenbendazole and invermectin
Does nothing.
@@schmingusss you forget the placebo effect, don't rain on someone's parade.
@@mrofnocnon Good point.
stay away from the healer nonsense and on line supplements fraud
🤍