How Intuitive Machines Nova C Landed on the Moon
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 фев 2024
- What makes this Nova-C Lunar Lander so special?
The Nova-C is the first spacecraft of its kind powered by cryogenic propellants consisting of liquid methane and liquid oxygen.
Once the Lunar lander completes its journey and softly lands on the Moon, it will mark the first privately-led mission to do so.
Lastly, this presents an opportunity for the United States to softly touch down on the Moon's surface since the last Apollo mission in the year 1972.
The Intuitive Machines lunar lander boasts dimensions of four meters in length, 1.57 meters in width, and a lift-off mass of 4,200-pound, Measuring it's six standing legs.
Instagram
/ aitelly3d
Twitter
/ aitelly3d
We make it on Blender
Download it is free and Safe
www.blender.org/download/
Peace Out
As a Small Channel We encourage you sharing our Videos ,
But Kindly be advised that any unofficial translations or editing of our work in any medium will be considered a breach of our intellectual property rights.
Apologies for the Legal Language, This happens because we had faced a lot of Duplicates Contents through Experiences ;)
This has been a result of Big Channels Duplicating our Contents Ripping our original hard work which we have created from Scratch from Modeling to Rigging to Animation to Rendering.So we had to involved Lawyers. 
Наука
How US Navy Destroyer Ship Works?
ruclips.net/video/gXyEmltrPZM/видео.htmlsi=TUWy_rKRQWumDPkS
Props to the cameraman coming all the way down to the moon so we can see this 🫡
🤔
Cost of Chandrayaan-3 is USD 75 million
I'll stop holding my breath when full communications are established, and we get the first photos
2nd mission to the moon since Apollo 11? Huh? Apollo 12? 14? 15? 16? 17?
That’s the first thing that jumped out at me in this video, too! Whoever/whatever posted this video online, just know that making such a boneheaded statement right out of the chute renders the info in the remainder of your video completely suspect.
@@randyjeske5784 Right, if they get that basic fact wrong then what else is wrong that's presented.
Bruh he’s referring to Apollo 17 in 1972. Don’t come yapping without basic knowledge
@@whirlwindeddie2124 Well, "bruh", he actually referred to Apollo 11 when he said that. Listen to it again. It's at the beginning of the video.
Glad someone said it....
1:58 Luna 1 was a flyby, Luna 9 was the first spacecraft to soft land. We forgot how America also came in with the Surveyor Landers. But great video
Chang'e 2 is a Chinese moon probe and NOT a lander! Even so, it weighs 2480 kg which is considerably bigger than Nova-C mass of 675 kg, and yet the graphics show Chang'e 2 to be considerably smaller than Nova-C and the even smaller Indian Lander. The Chang'e 5 (Lander + Returner) which is more appropriate to be used in the graphics weighs 4000 kg .
wow I also wanted to clarify this..
Thank you so much for posting this for us novices that are just excited about space travel.
Our pleasure!Thanks for the visit
Whys are there stars shown in space?
@@Brad_Fallon
It might surprise you, but, that's where stars exist. I know, crazy, huh?
@@Brad_Fallon Because there are stars in space and this is an animations so there´s no camera sensor that needs the right exposure.
Who was covering the space craft landing on the moon? The cameraman did great.
hehehe
I like how he didn't mention😅😅 the Chandrayaan-iii mission($74mn) when he was comparing missions on basis of cost effectiveness.
This mission costs about $118mn though it uses reusable rockets.
Btw, India is working on reusable rockets.
😂😂
It's not something to be proud of dimwit, it means we're not spending enough ₹ for science
That's a cool bit of Moon history....Congrats on the Intuitive crew. !!
Yes it was!
Congratulations Space X and Intuitive Machines
I'm Waiting for the Pictures :) there's is a Press Conference today Hope we see the Lunar Surface
Awesome explanation! Respect from India
Glad you liked it!
Glad to welcome India to the Lunar Club!
Feeling proud of Chandranyan 3 landing on the moon as expected not head side down 🇮🇳 and also congratulations to intuitive machine 👏
Right . Also at cost USD 75 Million.
Why are you proud? Did you have a part in building it?
Get off our internet lol.
@@ernst91 Is Internet your father's property?
@@ernst91 is indian off your company going down
0:01 There were 6 more Apollo missions to the moon since Apollo11.
Really WTF? Did I not see Apollo 16 launch when I was 12 yo?
Pretty sure most people watching this knew that! But the LM did not change much in mass, and not at all in dimensions, on subsequent missions.
@@richardmalcolm1457Well if you ignore the lunar rover, the larger fuel tanks, bigger batteries, more life support, and a bigger engine on the later Apollo missions
It's comical watching people bicker over details of stage props. It's like watching Star Trek/Wars fans go at it. 😂
@@PotatoSalad614 I'm aware of the J class upgrades; but I think the point was, for the purposes of the comparison aimed at by the video, just referencing Apollo 11's LM was basically sufficient.
Great video. Thanks for breaking that all down. Fascinating stuff!
My pleasure!
Chandryaan 3 🇮🇳 : 75M USD
NOVA C : 118M USD 🙄
That's when you point out how long it will take and don't mention the cost lol.
How it "landed," in a video posted... before it landed 🤔
We might be the SIMSONS.
Joke aside Have a Nice day
CGI keeps getting better and better
😉 made this in 2 days
That is awsome 👍
Your video was much more fascinating and informative than the live event itself 👌
Glad you enjoyed it!
It also had better CGI.😉
1:28 the first utilization of a Methane-Based Engine in space is not Nova C but a Chinese Orbital Rocket "Zhuque-2"
Did you say second or seventh mission to the moon since Apollo 11 in 1969? Because you realize we landed on the moon five more times with people and once orbit did with Apollo 13
It's hard to maintain a lie.
I remain sceptical untill i see video of the touchdown.
I'm also Waiting for the Pictures :) there's is a Press Conference today
There is nothing to be sceptical about, I guarantee you that lander landed on the moon. The real question that has yet to be determined is how many pieces is it in?
There's plenty of reasons to be skeptical unless you lack critical thinking skills. @@wally7856
comparing the price of nova c to change 2 is very unrealistic , first the Change 2 doesn't cost 200m but only around 120m including the launch, 2nd nova c was only expected to serve for only 15days as you said max but some sources says less, meanwhile change 2 carried its mission for almost 2years and it is the first mission that produces high resolution images of the entire moon including its maps on 2012 which was publicly released on 2018
_"2nd mission to the moon since Apollo 11."_
I guess 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17 don't count?
Noted
@@Aitellyjust basic fact checking before publishing, sheesh🤦
@@PotatoSalad614 Hack fraud channel.
Sir actually chandrayaan 3 was usnig Angular Momentum and gravitational pull and thrusting concept that's why it took 40 days in affordable manner
Yes we already made a video about it
A unique brilliant work, to explain the whole Sir. You act in first line. Thank you !
excellent video so informative and well put together x
We tried our best in 2 days.
Solid channel! So much potential, keep pushing
Pushing the agenda, the fake heliocentric agenda😂
@Aitelly make an animation video on India's SMART Torpedo.
It's a very interesting one.
Thanks for making me understand it better
Happy to help We tried our best in 2 days
Note that this video uses "pounds" as the unit for both force (1:25) and mass (1:47). Was this done to cater to the US audience, or are the engineers stuck using archaic units? The latter would be scary.
Our Biggest Audience are from the US.
It's not in my control. Our American Audience gets angry if we use other Units.
Tough to Cater to everyone.
FINALLY A SHIP VIDEO. I have been waiting for one since last year
If you guys remember, I requested it in the very early days of the channel when you said that you had like...1 or 2 animators. IT WAS quite early. Thanks!!!
Thanks Coming Sooner than you think
"When it come to space and space travel, science and science fiction are essentially the same"- William Shatner
The one obvious comparison left out of this overview (which is pretty good as far as it goes) would have been NASA's Surveyor landers (1966-68).
4:33 2nd us moon landing after more than 50 years?
Are you considering the Eaglecam 1st landing?
you might be right
We can see the launches on clear nights The Space Center is about 80 miles from where I live. I worked on fishing boats in the 80's down there and a heck of a thing waking you up when they shot off! First time it scared the shit out of me LMAO
I very much enjoyed your video and I gave it a Thumbs Up
Thanks! we love you guys.
@@Aitelly Really enjoy the videos you put out!!
@@oneshotme Thanks we tried our best
Now to make a counterintuitive craft next.
Stanley Kubrick would appreciate your cartoons))
:) Staley Says Hi.
Looking at the comments, it appears that institutionalized conformity is still alive and well. These people traded intelligence for education. How in the heck is anybody still believing such preposterous claims that people have ever been to the moon?
Very interesting.
Thanks for the segment. AI Telly's animations and explanations are easily understandable and answer questions not normally asked on segments of this type.
Thanks! we love you Guys
LOVED THE VIDEO, your production quality has always been good, but has gotten ridiculously good in the past year, I love your comment about Russia’s failing Lander being a sad occasion and you were absolutely right science is science and politics or petty nationalism shouldn’t get in the way. Keep it up!
Yea, but why does he shows stars in space in the animation? Both Armstrong and Aldrin have stated repeatedly that one cannot see stars in space with either the human eye or cameras? "Black Velvet" is what they called it?
@@Brad_Fallon I would say that the reason is because of the images that we get from our space telescopes and from our ground based telescopes. It is in the public zeitgeist that in space you see stars, because most of us only see pictures from telescopes. Now in Reality, it you are on the bright side of the moon you will be experiencing a significant amount of light from the sun reflecting off the lunar surface into your eye thusly blinding you to the very insignificant amount of light from even our closest stars . However, that is nuance. so I am guessing that they showed stars because that is what people expect to see and they did not want to have thousands of angry people in the comments pointing out how stupid their video was because there were no stars.
What do you think the reason is ?
@@jacksondodd8835I would say it's all fakery and any more than that is not allowed to be discussed on youtube... We are a highly censured nation.
Apollo 11, 1969. Apollo 17, 1972, last landing 52 years ago. Apollo flights were manned.
“This marks the second US mission to the moon”
Only one second into the video and he has already made a huge error. There were 5 more Apollo landings after Apollo 11, the last in 1972
Noted
Thanks
Welcome
You could have more accurately shown the orbital trajectories of each craft. For example, the India one I think that took a long time to reach the Moon, you could have shown to some degree the many Earth and Moon orbits it did to manage its the polar landing with minimal initial delta-v.
Proud ❤
Why not add the Surveyors and Rangers?
its 7:30 am on the 23rd and there is still no contact
Why did IM-1 team had to wait for confirmed landing? I think they waited for over 1minute to get confirmation from the lander. What causes this delay in getting the information? Do our simulation time data vary with the actual real events happening with the lander trying to land on moon or something else. As far as i know, Time lag is only 2.56seconds to get data from moon.
After looking at their RF equipment they essentially utilized old apollo methodologies with modern digital equipment and SDRs. their high gain antenna, i dont think is steerable which is why they had a weak signal. if it landed on an incline the footprint moves away and it's much more difficult to acquire their signal. they did a decent job but their communications could use some improvement.
Do a video on Biafran tech
Lots of inaccuracies, but good animation.
Change 2 is only an orbital observer, Change 3 weight 1200kg and 1m height landed on moon in 2013. 10 years earlier than India, Japan and US.
Your width of one and a half meters is shown to include the landing legs. That isn't true. It is the diameter of the body only
That's wonderful job my bro thank you so much for that and really i have a wish and little request
My bro i wish that you do some videos about air-launch rockets and satellites like NASA Pegasus and the atmospheric satellites or atmosat' s like NASA pathfinder
When will the US go metric ? Imperial for weight but metric for height and width
Will do in the next Video✌
We have to be different. The USA only measures in Freedom Miles 🇺🇸
I heard the test launch over shot right into Uranus. Anybody know about that?
And to think we watched Apollo 11 live as it happened in 1969. We watched Neil land it live on surface LIVE. Technology is going backwards these days. Had to wait minutes to know if this damn thing landed.
I'm also Waiting for the Pictures :) there's is a Press Conference today.
Video, not stills, of the entire expedition from start to finish. It's 2024. If they cannot afford a Gopro they may happily borrow mine. Years ago I bought a used Gopro Hero Silver for $50 off Ebay. @@Aitelly
first 5 seconds and im done with the video- "2nd mission to the moon in over 50 years" lmfao cant even get the number of landings right
Great have a nice day to you too
So as per the briefing today it crashed and flipped over...
Great spin on "landing"...
Bro you didn't mention the budget of Chandrayan 3, which was 75 million dollars which is less than this mission. You cleverly tried to show that this is the cheapest mission to the Moon. You cleverly said that this is designed to last for 15 days, but in the case of Chandrayan you said that it only last 14 days, like you were trying to say that Chandrayan was designed stay longer but it didn't
Yes intentionally he hided few points, chandrayaan 3 designed for 1 lunar day only and it is cost effective, No moon machine was landed accurately other then isro CH3 moon machine.
IM3 is crashed on moon, it's not successful landed,but they are projecting like it's landed safely, no telemetry data no visual representation, Not released single photo till now. Watch ISRO & JAXA moon landing live telecast, these guys are not ready to accept failures.
I’ll go watch a high school science report for accuracy.
Next
Why Imperial measurements? Anyone interested in space is probably in a STEM field and prefers metric. Plus the test of the world thinks we're nuts and we are.
Noted
1:55 Starts presentantion of the Wacky Moon Landers 👍
I remember when India landed their first vehicle on the south pole of the moon, and people on RUclips complimented the camera crew who had been waiting on the moon to film it.
India does nothing on the technology. They bought modular equipment from 1st world countries and launched on their land.
Yes a 3rd world country landed on the moon, and I'm jesus christ
@@larryvanbarriger6670 stupid ⬆️
Are u stupid?
Those were computer simulations to show us how it will land on moon
@larryvanbarriger6670 India has quite the active space program and launches satellites on rockies it has designed and built. Don't be so arrogant and close-minded.
You seem to leave out that there have been more than one Apollo mission. And we have gone more than once
Best of luck to the Nova C lander 24
Amazing work 👽
Thank you! Cheers!
Why have we not seen any images from the eaglecam?
I'm also Waiting :)
Looking at the complexity and high failure rate of landing on Moon, sometimes i wonder did Apollo missions really landed human on Moon ?
Aitelly bro u should have mentioned the cost of chandrayan 3 if u r comparing every lander but if u r not mentioning then why mentioning how much days it took to reach moon. U should be biased on ur report.
"...second mission to the moon since Apollo 11 nearly 50 years ago" ??? You mean since Apollo 17 more than 50 years ago.
Noted 👍🏻
So actually the cube sat will be the first soft landing?
Luna 1 never landed. It missed the moon and went into orbit around the sun.
It was never intended to soft land, it was planned as an impactor. Those aren’t landing legs as you show in the video, they are antennas.
Yes you are right. Agreed.
How are you able to believe such nonsense?
Could you animate a Höllenhund some day (V1 rocket)? That would be interesting, especially how it was programmed to reach its target.
I always love German Engineering Will take a look
@@Aitelly Great! Thanks a lot 😀 greetings from a German Engineer 😎
@@Aitellymake one on India's SMART Torpedo.
As was with the C-19 jabs, moon landings are also a litmus test. Will you pass or fail?
It crashed it didn't land
I think u forgot about the mission cost of chandrayan 2
You forgot Apollo 12-17 but yeah second after Apollo 11. :DD
space exploration is amazingly interesting thanks for the video.
Thanks to you for your comment 🙏🏻
Any actual photos or videos ?
I heard they are downloading.🤔
Hands down best animated comparisons, and script! I seriously hope for this channel’s success.
Thanks New Video tommorow.
If they had fitted 1/6 of planned solar panel on 6 faces and inter connected them, this charging problem due to not facing sun could have been avoided ! D.O.N India
5:54 Not the Command Module.
How many eagle cams can we drop? Doge?
can i translate it and use for the talian public who doesn't know english?
Absolutely great experience
Sir talk about new iranian warship shahid sayyad shirazi and shahid hassan bagheri please
will look into it I want to research on this Iranian Ship
SpaceX might use the Tesla FSD technology to auto adjust its positions
Too bad it didn't work out this way.
चंद्रयान ❌ चंद्रयेन ☑️ 😅😂
2nd mission since Apollo 11? What about the other 5?
Why would they make it so top heavy? Probably why it tipped over.
Why only simulations? Where is the video of the actual landing?
That's why we made simulation.im also worried 🙁
4:04 .... hopeful
Yup finger 🤞🏻
Still no human payload! 😂
Do a video on how you make your videos.
:) that's more Difficult than Creating
118 million..... thats nothing...the budget for dispicable me 4 is 500 million lol
👽
It made it to the moon, is on the surface, but is it in one piece, did it crash?
50 years after....
🏆🤗🙏💙
Thank you for sharing this
You are so welcome