Worked Example | Where Will Two Cars Traveling at Different Velocities Meet? | Kinematic Equations

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 сен 2023
  • At t=0 car traveling at a constant velocity of 25m/s is 100m behind a car traveling in the same direction at a velocity of 20m/s. Calculate the time and position at which the faster car will overtake the slower car.
    This problem can be viewed as a relative motion problem where the difference in the velocities between the two vehicles can used to find how long it will take the faster car to make up the difference in the two cars positions... However, while that may work in this case, it is better to learn the fundamentals of setting two equations of motion, more specifically position, equal to each other now in a relatively simple problem. That way later on in more complicated problems you have the skillset to find where two objects undergoing more complicated motion will meet.
    This kinematics problem shows up in a variety of STEM courses including high school physics. It serves as the foundation of problems that will appear on the AP Physics 1, AP Physics C, A Level Physics and JEE exams.

Комментарии • 28

  • @erinbentson6682
    @erinbentson6682 9 месяцев назад +6

    Love that this is all color coded!

    • @INTEGRALPHYSICS
      @INTEGRALPHYSICS  9 месяцев назад

      I hear that's important for some people. =)

  • @skouterr
    @skouterr 9 месяцев назад +5

    Useful video!! My teacher always tell me to learn the hard way, so in exam that wouldn’t be easy as that.

    • @INTEGRALPHYSICS
      @INTEGRALPHYSICS  9 месяцев назад +3

      Thanks! This method is very useful in more complicated scenarios, the problem being that typically people shortcut this problem using relative velocity thus never learning the 'formal' way to solve the problem they will need later on down the line.

  • @user-xq6gj6es7g
    @user-xq6gj6es7g 3 месяца назад +1

    Thank you so much ......from Iran

  • @meghashyam_nagiri_07
    @meghashyam_nagiri_07 Месяц назад +1

    Great Way of Explation and Moreover That Presentation is just Awesome !

  • @nicolabombace2004
    @nicolabombace2004 9 месяцев назад +2

    You just hinted at it, but you could have solved the time used to catch up using a reference frame moving with the blue car, and solve for the red car to move 100 mt

    • @INTEGRALPHYSICS
      @INTEGRALPHYSICS  9 месяцев назад +2

      thats how many people solve this problem in their head (including me). the issue arises when the objects start accelerating, at that point you need to go back to the full position equations. i find it is best to teach the full version from the beginning so people dont get confused later on with more complicated problems.

    • @nicolabombace2004
      @nicolabombace2004 9 месяцев назад +1

      @@INTEGRALPHYSICS We could argue that even the "full form" is not general enough since it assumes constant acceleration, but I see your point.

    • @INTEGRALPHYSICS
      @INTEGRALPHYSICS  9 месяцев назад

      Very true!

  • @marshalljamieson231
    @marshalljamieson231 8 месяцев назад +3

    How would you modify the equation if the time is staggered?

    • @INTEGRALPHYSICS
      @INTEGRALPHYSICS  8 месяцев назад

      use t for the object that starts last, and use time is t+1 (or whatever the stagger is) for the first vehicle.

  • @shinieabrasado3920
    @shinieabrasado3920 3 месяца назад +1

    Why is it 5t=100? I didn't understand that part. (I try using
    the formula since i have another problem that involves acceleration and deceleration). Hope you can explain it to me.

  • @andreanludvig
    @andreanludvig 7 месяцев назад +2

    I have a physics test on Friday let's Hope this helps otherwise I'm getting kicked from school 😭😭😭😭

  • @partiquebecois7801
    @partiquebecois7801 6 месяцев назад +2

    The Question is way too simple, will never get this question on an exam

  • @cyphex9809
    @cyphex9809 9 месяцев назад +6

    helpful video but if you're someone who's fairly comfortable with physics, using relative velocity makes this much simpler.
    Relative velocity of car 1 wrt car 2 = 25-20=5 m/s.
    Distance to cover = 100m
    time taken = 100/5 = 20secs
    Distance travelled by car 1 = 25x20 = 500m.

    • @INTEGRALPHYSICS
      @INTEGRALPHYSICS  9 месяцев назад

      true, however if one of the objects is accellerating, that method leaves most people stranded.

    • @cyphex9809
      @cyphex9809 9 месяцев назад +3

      @@INTEGRALPHYSICS completely agree. but question solving is always trying to find the simplest approach to the solution. The complexity can always increase. Say for example, the acceleration is time dependent and not constant, then even the equations of motion at constant acceleration don't hold and you'll have to integrate. Although I definitely do believe that the method you used here is better for beginners because it gives more conceptual clarity, thus why I said "if you're someone comfortable with physics".

  • @HondaCivic-lm2tn
    @HondaCivic-lm2tn 8 месяцев назад +3

    I have a test in 4 hours am I failing

    • @alianettehernandez5671
      @alianettehernandez5671 8 месяцев назад +2

      Try one hour 😭😭

    • @INTEGRALPHYSICS
      @INTEGRALPHYSICS  8 месяцев назад

      Reading this and it says the comment was 5 hours ago... Hope it went well.

    • @HondaCivic-lm2tn
      @HondaCivic-lm2tn 8 месяцев назад +1

      @@INTEGRALPHYSICS I got a 30/35 points, but that was only 1 question wrong so I take that as a win

  • @Studyacoount-bh3hc
    @Studyacoount-bh3hc 9 месяцев назад +13

    U can solve it within 5 seconds in your brain. Relative velocity is 25-29=5 m/s and distance between them is 100. So time taken is relative velocity/ time = 100/5 = 20 secs

    • @anonymous1726
      @anonymous1726 21 день назад +1

      He just explained the position equation, if you solve this question having both car some acceleration it will be difficult so solve by relative instead it's easy by using the formula