I like how you're to the point without a bunch of fluff. I also like how you use the same example for both deduction and induction so I could compare. There's a lot of long-winded videos out there that don't help you understand the difference.
Thank you alot, precise clear and understandable. believe me so far I have watched two videos of yours I have never understood from any teacher at anything the way I have understood from you. Thank you again.
I have watched a lot of videos to fully understand the differences between deductive and inductive arguments, but this one is the most helpful. Thank you very much!
heck of a lot better than trying to read all this again. Reading about this stuff gets Pedro sleepy. Pedro is sleepy. Pedro just finish reading. D or I? Thank you Sir, for the great content.
1. Deductive argument begins with general principle and ends with specific provision. In inductive argument we begin with specific provisions or observations and we end with general principles. 2. In deductive argument the conclusion is necessarily certain given that the premises are true, while in inductive argument the general statement is probably true even if the premises are true.
Thanks, sir, but I still have a question. Suppose that I want to understand the process of expert judgement in clinical medicine and through a critical literature review, I consider that this process can be explained from the perspective of knowledge. However, this is my understanding rather than an existing theory. Can I based on it to do deductive research in clinical medicine?
It is like relationships between a scientist and an engineer A scientist finds the laws of nature by inductive reasoning Then by this natural laws which are discovered by scientists,engineers utilities them via deductive reasoning by expectations of validity of this laws in case if results was false it means that inductive reasoning failed and it needs to be corrected again by scientists
Example at world war 2 When German were building v2 rockets to hit London they use Newtonian laws of physic But the results was failure problem was they didn't consider aerodynamic laws which affect on speed and range of the rockets
Hi doctor, I have these questions, this statement is inductive or deductive (abortion is wrong, because all human life is sacred). And the other one (jon will proably be promoted soon, since he is working here for longer time than the others). I will be appreciated if you answered
Saying that deductive arguments' conclusions are necessarily true if premises are true is, in itself, an inductive argument that is probably true but not certainly true. Therefore, you can't say deductive arguments necessarily lead to true conclusions.
THANK YOU. You have no idea how much I appreciated this.
Short, to the point and good examples - this is great for all ages not just A level! Thank you!
Very helpful! Would highly recommend. Clear and crisp for beginners without too much confusing theory.
I like this explanation - so clear, brief and treat the viewers proportionally. Great Thanks
Thank you for helping a 71 year old.
Pretty clear and adds on to what i got from my lecture this week. Thank you.
I like how you're to the point without a bunch of fluff. I also like how you use the same example for both deduction and induction so I could compare. There's a lot of long-winded videos out there that don't help you understand the difference.
This is the best example that I have found and I have searched and searched, thanks a lot!
Thank you alot, precise clear and understandable. believe me so far I have watched two videos of yours I have never understood from any teacher at anything the way I have understood from you. Thank you again.
deductive argument can only be valid or invalid. Inductive argument can be strong or weak.
What the fuck are you saying 😂
😊😊😊😊thank you !!!
structure and the strength of conclusion...thank you lecturer for the kind help
You have amazing teaching skills, Thank you🎉🎉
Hats off for u sir..
You helped me a lot
Glad it was useful
Something very complicated explained in very easy way. Thanks.
My wig needed this and you did a great job of explaining it.
Great Work Highly Appreciate
Thank you so much for the video!!! You made this simple and easy to understand. Thumbs up for you!!!!!
This was very good. Better than my math book. Thank you.
Thank you for your clear explanation, great voice!
THANK YOU THAT WAS THE BEST VIDEO ON THAT TOPIC!!
Great video! They differ in structure and the strength of conclusions.
just what i needed for my revision. thank you so much
Thank you! This explanation makes so much sense.
thanks sir, its very effective and usefull..very clear concepts thanks u
Very helpful and straight to the point
I ntiyiso MuHlave. Na mina ndzi n'wi kumea hlamusela Swi twala.
You are the best , you made it very clear. Thank you
I have watched a lot of videos to fully understand the differences between deductive and inductive arguments, but this one is the most helpful. Thank you very much!
Glad it helped! Thanks for the feedback
This is good I have been fumbling about these arguments
very nice.. u are master in teaching.....
thank you for this video, Mr. Moffat
Thank you! It has helped me with my assignment! :D
Very informative description..... 👍
I loved it...thank you so much sir.
Great way to explain , well done , Thank you
thanks you are an amazing instructor
very understandable, thank you so much
Love you sir well explained ❤️😘
Great video. thanks much!
heck of a lot better than trying to read all this again. Reading about this stuff gets Pedro sleepy. Pedro is sleepy. Pedro just finish reading. D or I? Thank you Sir, for the great content.
Out standing 🔥🔥🔥
Thank you! Very clear without jargon that I cannot understand.
thanks for this video really helped me understand
Thank you for this...now I know.
Great lesson, thank you!
Thank you sir
You are awesome.
Thnx sir i understood 100 percent thnx alot
Using both methods simultaneously leads to madness. Welcome to the world of focused A.D.D.
Wow thx so so much for this info
Really nice sir.
Easy to understand. Thanks a lot
Thank you for your nice video.
u are so fantastic please teach us informal fallacy
precisely described.Thanks
Thanks sir, how easily u explained us this topic
This helped me a lot.
Thank you so much sir! ✨
Good job bro
Nice , Dear sir, please make videos on this topic"Effects of inductive method in learning process at secondary level"
Awesome thank you soo much
this is very good.
Thank you very much sir 😊
thank you sir you help me a lot
Good dude, thanks you
I LOVE YOU SO MUCH(no homo). YOU'VE SAVED MY LIFEEE MAN.
Nigga had to throw the no homo in there 🤣🤣
I think your first example is inductive because it follows patterns and leads to an inference.
Perfect !
Thanks so much 🙏
explanation is good
Any relation to Steven Moffat? Great Video!
I watched this entire video.
nice speech
Thanks for this. I have an exam tomorrow.
armyyy
Can you explain why the God exist example is not Inductive please?
Thank you!
Thanks very much
Thanks for uploading/producing this. Am I right in saying that, at 5:30 in your vid, Mr Moffat might not have gone to work at all on Friday?
Yes. Or worn different colour shoes
thank you!
1. Deductive argument begins with general principle and ends with specific provision. In inductive argument we begin with specific provisions or observations and we end with general principles.
2. In deductive argument the conclusion is necessarily certain given that the premises are true, while in inductive argument the general statement is probably true even if the premises are true.
I think the probabilistic outcomes of inductive reasoning are evidence of the existence of everything.
Thank you so much!!!!
You're welcome!
wow!!
Deductive argument can be either valid or invalid while inductive argument can be either cogent or uncogent
what about the premises and conclusion??
Thank you
Wonderful! But there is/are deductive arguments that go from particular to general and inductive arguments that proceed from general to particular.
thanks sir
1. DNA is the same for identical twins.
2. Identical twins are not always the same sexual orientation.
C. DNA does not determine sexual orientation.
Thanks, sir, but I still have a question.
Suppose that I want to understand the process of expert judgement in clinical medicine and through a critical literature review, I consider that this process can be explained from the perspective of knowledge. However, this is my understanding rather than an existing theory. Can I based on it to do deductive research in clinical medicine?
All scientific knowledge is inductive. You accumulate more and more evidence in order to make the truth of conclusions more and more probable.
It is like relationships between a scientist and an engineer
A scientist finds the laws of nature by inductive reasoning
Then by this natural laws which are discovered by scientists,engineers utilities them via deductive reasoning by expectations of validity of this laws in case if results was false it means that inductive reasoning failed and it needs to be corrected again by scientists
Example at world war 2
When German were building v2 rockets to hit London they use Newtonian laws of physic
But the results was failure
problem was they didn't consider aerodynamic laws which affect on speed and range of the rockets
The first deductive argument can be shown to not be necessarily true in real life. It doesn’t guarantee a future occurrence.
Hi doctor,
I have these questions, this statement is inductive or deductive (abortion is wrong, because all human life is sacred). And the other one (jon will proably be promoted soon, since he is working here for longer time than the others). I will be appreciated if you answered
Both are deductive as premises are general statements and results are specific.
👍👏👏
How can we explain Deduction and Induction in Metaphysics?? Like with the example of God you've given
4:06 it won't "equally could be false",it is more likely to be true then not.But yes,it is not certain.
A tad pernickety, but yes it is not 50/50 so point taken. Thanks for watching
He might work on Saturday or Sunday.
Can some one summer use in there own words how the differ ? TIA
6:32 If you had seen your friend's swan, wouldn't that make it a deductive argument?
I have some mistakes, gotta relearn. Thank you!
Saying that deductive arguments' conclusions are necessarily true if premises are true is, in itself, an inductive argument that is probably true but not certainly true. Therefore, you can't say deductive arguments necessarily lead to true conclusions.
superbly explained!! but in this video Speaker pronunciation for word "often" wasn't correct. :)
Be A'man: look up ethnocentrism
A.B Guruji oh my goodness, really. Reaching
6.28