Add the videos to the interrogation- Her insistence she wasn’t drunk yet seems her former husband’s testimony about her drinking and behavior will show her claim on that to be a potential lie. I felt like some of the previous attorneys disagreement with her might have been claim of battered spouse with the interrogation & videos
That's the job of the defense. The state has to follow the rules and not violate the defendant's rights. Everyone in law enforcement know this, some don't care (Trooper Proctor). But its important.
@@PurlingQueen Simple response: She didn't know BWS was a defense. She didn't know that if she said "I was afraid to let him out because he would beat me like he did before" that was a valid defense. So naturally, she tried other ways to minimize her culpability (saying she went to sleep, denying she was drunk). That's why you need a lawyer before you talk to the police. A lawyer in Florida would have known that "I fell asleep" was not a defense to depraved heart (because she left him in mortal peril) but would have known that BWS was a possible defense.
@@PurlingQueen the video of the incident she took of herself is pretty damning too, she's literally laughing as he's stuck inside pleading to be let out, saying oh he shouldn't of cheated on her then now he knows how she feels
To make herself attractive and likeable to a jury, Sarah does not need a hairstylist and makeup artist. She needs Jesus, because what she wants is a miracle.
Went back and watched the interrogation Owens was speaking about and the only thing the detective didnt say was the very last sentence you commonly hear"with these rights in mind do you still want to talk with us" but she did ask everything else including"did anyone threaten you etc to talk" and most importantly "do you understand everything i've read to you" and the answer from Sarah was "yes" and she confirmed it wasn't the 1st time she was read her Miranda Rights...not gonna lie Owen's motions were kinda ridiculous but if Sarah is running the ship im not surprised he's making these kinds of arguments🤷🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️Great vid as always❤ & I hope everyone has a wonderful day 🥰
In the car interview, SB wasn't detained or called to the station and willingly got into the cop car to speak with them. They mirandized her even though they were not required to. When they spoke to SB at the LE station, The detective's had Sarah Boone sign a Waiver of her rights, instead of asking her out loud. I guarantee you that she signed that she understood them and choose to waive her rights and to speak with them anyway. They could have gone one step further and asked if there was any reason she wished to talk to a lawyer prior to speaking to them, but they were not required to do that. SB thought she could convince them she wasn't at fault so she wanted to talk to them.
Queenofhearts, thanks for explaining. I’m no lawyer but at this point it makes no sense to be arguing about a card! Hadn’t she had Miranda rights read to her more than one time. In 4 years surely she knows what they are.
Her interviews, sworn under oath, directly contradict their defense that she felt that she had to kill him. That's why he's trying to get them thrown out.
The judge filed his order this afternoon denying the states motion to strike bss. Judge also denied stated motion to prevent defense from mentioning BSS in opening statements.
Exactly. They've got nothing, and her insistence when the cops arrived at the scene that it was not deliberate - how many times did she tell the officer that? Many. Over and over and over......
Owens isnt SB lawyer--he is her voice. All her other lawyers shot her down like "No Sarah I wont ask the judge for you to have a makeup and hair stylist."
Sarah Boone stated on Video," For all the things you have ever done to me." "Sarah, Sarah," Jorge calls. "That's my name don't wear it out," Says Sarah. Jorge says, "Sarah, I can't breath." "That's the way I felt when you cheated on me." Sarah says. Sarah shows she is punishing him for what he's done. Sarah forgot she even took a video of the event, how could she remember in detail everything else when she most likely was pass out drunk?
What someone says during their trial, has no bearing on other victims, in this big world. Whether you think these others are the “real” victims or fake victims, it’s not their trial. It’s inconsequential. What are you even talking about!
ago @ cherylj7460 ALL cases serve to set precedents for all later cases, that’s why cases are constantly referenced during motions, etc., because they serve to structure all possible later arguments in all cases to come. Every case/trial absolutely and fundamentally serves as the basis for all later cases…
@@cherylj7460 It does, though. Actual victims are already blamed and accused of not being sincere. If she is ultimately seen as a faker (which I think she is) that puts even more scrutiny on actual victims. Because oh, really? She was "abused" huh, just like that Sarah Boone chick who murdered her boyfriend was "abused" right?
@@Kim-g8j5s That's pretty common behavior for people who are victims of DV. I suspect based on her level of entitlement and other factors (control of money, etc) that Sarah is more likely abuser than victim. But I don't think her bailing him out is a good indicator either way.
I appreciate your brilliant breakdown of this hearing. As far as their defense: Sarah constantly provoked and attacked the victim then recorded him when he fought back in order to manipulate the situation to make it look like he was abusive. There's absolutely no way she stopped recording if he started threatening her from within the suitcase, and I sure hope the jury recognizes a lie when they hear it.
She wants make up and hair done and some nice clothes because she seriously believes she is going to be standing on the Court House Steps giving interviews when she is found not guilty and is set free Man is she in for a shock.
She DOES! 😮 She’s so intent on a skirt also. She’ll be sitting behind a table, there’s no point! Hair n makeup? She didn’t wear makeup out of jail! She thinks she pulling a Jodi Arias stunt 😂 Uh No Boozey Boone. Prob wants a box of wine for trial too
@@AmyLou402a skirt so she can have you Sharon stone moment flashing the jury. Won't her legs be shackled now that a troupe of interesting bedfellows answered her ad?
The problem with Owens' position is that he wants to know exactly what the state's argument is going to be regarding Mr. Torres' death so that he can fashion a set of facts that runs contrary to it; in other words, he wants to refute everything the prosecution is going to say at trial -- BEFORE the trial. He SHOULD BE formulating a set of facts as they see them, REGARDLESS of what the prosecution is going to allege, and THAT'S why the state's objecting.
Idk if the child was even with her ... Might have been in school during that time. May have been with her ex. Idc though. Makes no matter to me. she recorded her actions.
The problem with the self defense, battered spouse defense is 1. Her record of abuse against her ex and Jorge and 2. Jorge sounds so desperate to get out of the suitcase, he is begging her on the video to let him out, begging for his life and it's HEART BREAKING to hear. She got a video of that but didn't get a video of him threatening her life?? Its because he didn't and she is a liar and an abuser. Sarah has been doing her own hair her entire life...she can do it now too. How rediculous 🙄🙄🙄
Well we do, unless shes now saying she did lie because she says over and over we had a great night, we playes games and did crafts and i dont know what to tell you guys I simply fell asleep, it was an accident. She says the word accident dozens and dozens of times @dianap5504
@@dianap5504 except Sarah stated multiple times they were having a good time doing a puzzle and drinking wine, she never stated the first day that their was any violence. The defense is truly grasping at straws, I hope Jorge and family get justice!
@@dianap5504if she had “put him in there” because he was being dangerous wouldn’t she at least have listed that as one of the reasons why she wouldn’t let him out? While he begged she whined about him cheating. She did not suggest that she couldn’t let him out because of her fear. You know why I think that is? Because she wasn’t afraid. She was not afraid.
If I was a juror on this case as soon as I hear she purposely went upstairs to bed. That's it for me You accidently fall asleep by sitting down and falling asleep climbing stairs getting into bed is a deliberate action
ESP after this man was just begging her to let him out!! I mean obviously under any circumstances, that’s when you unzip the suitcase. You don’t just walk away (which by itself is diabolical) and proceed to walk upstairs and climb in bed and drift off to sleep as if no one is zipped inside of a suitcase on your living room floor. The entire thing is just wild to me and there’s not one single thing you can claim as a defense that will make it make sense 🤦🏻♀️
@@supergirl2204 Drunkeness is being possessed by "spirits". Liquor stores used to have signs liquor, wine, spirits. It is mind altering to a point, where you are not your normal self. Our laws do not support being drunk as an excuse in DUI cases.
@@kneel1when I heard that she was changing her story again, all I could think of was "oh, so we're pulling a page out of the Jodi Arias handbook are we?" I mean, it worked so well for her 😂
Lol, it reminded if the Nancy Brophy trial when she became so flustered on the stand she said "and I don't even know how to defend myself against the truth." 🤣
Yes I'd say SB is in the drivers seat and she is telling the lawyer what defense he will use in her defense, not him telling her what will and will not be helpful to her. SB is the one asking him to make these ridiculous motions.
It was a flucker Cuck. I think they wanted to get her sentenced and forget about all the happy horse plopping surrounding the situation. Unfortunately she's shown herself to be an unreliable narrator, but Idt this outcome is what she was told it would be. She might start talking. Pissed off kid doesn't just decide to pew pew
She had a list of questions, including getting her phone back, the kids device , oh and ……the ring off the cold dead hand of the man she murdered. Remember how she was so disappointed she wasn’t getting that ring back. That sounds just like a woman who was terrified of the man she had to kill in self defense. I’m no one but I think she would have faired better to go with accident. Give her a damn fair trial but this woman is guilty of second degree murder.
I don't believe she had any idea that he would die. These 2 have history of doing bad things to each other. When she said " Now you know how it feels when you choke me" that she knew how violent he could be esp when drinking.
@@andsuddenly4252 It doesn't sound like they're suggesting she's not guilty. Just that it's not typical premeditated 1st degree. Manslaughter vs 2nd degree is a harder call for me, partially just because as a non-expert it's not fully clear where the lines are drawn between the types in Florida... I'm very eager to hear the state explain the elements of the charge, and why they believe the evidence supports that.
@@GraceVibration i think she used the word cheat, not choke. its been a while since i've seen that video but i'm fairly certain cheat is the word she used.
I legitimately believe that she's been trying to get her 8 previews representatives to argue self defense all along. I think that'd why they kept saying things like "irreconcilable differences" when they were released or flat out quit her case.
@@rebekahsutton7128 That has been my thought the whole time as well. I know Bankowitz was at least considering it at one point and it was brought up in court, but I think all the other lawyers knew that it would be an outright lie to say this was battered spouse or self defense.
Thank you Peter for spending over an hour updating us on the SB hearing from yesterday! 💗 I do think that she will have to testify if she is claiming self-defense.
If she claims battered woman syndrome, and if she was so afraid of him, why then did she feel comfortable going up to bed, she wasn’t worried that he would get out and come upstairs? No, I believe she never went upstairs, I believe she tormented him until she was so drunk, passed out and when she woke he was dead! If she was afraid of him, she could have called the cops and then let him out when the cops came…
The female detective left out: Understanding these rights is it your wish to speak to us now? Sarah confirmed she understood her rights, and she couldn’t wait to start blabbing her fat mouth about how great she is and how much she helped the man she just killed.
She was mirandized in front of her apt by 2 cops; mirandized at the police station on paper, line by line she initialed each right as they were read, and reminded of them several times during office interrogations. Idiot lawyer had access to all the video tapes. That's what he gets for grabbing a no win case to build up his waining reputation.
25 years ago, my cousin shot her husband to death because she was sick of getting the sh*t outta her. She's still in prison. It pisses me off, really pisses me off, that Boone is trying to use this defense
The Defense atty. said self-defense so low, I'm sure the Judge didn't hear it and why didn't he state self-defense at previous hearings? This atty. and Sarah deserve each other.
Ok so bottom line - if she was terrified of his actions when he got out because she was a BS - then she would never have just went up to bed. Never. Who goes to bed knowing or even thinking they may wake up to a beating any moment. She also hammered home so hars that he could get out. So it doesnt fly that she would take that risk.
When cops ask you to come in and answer some questions, you don't have to you can always stay at home. When she came in to talk , the police were free to ask what they want and use it against her
Here’s your particulars: Jorge died alone stuffed in a hot dark suitcase that Sarah says she told him to get in and then she zipped it up. He begged for air and to get out of that suitcase while Sarah filmed him and laughed and mocked him, and then skipped off to bed as he drew his last painful breathes. She’s an alcoholic, lying, narcissist. Never said I’m sorry to his family or anybody. It’s all about Sarah and her plight. I’m glad she has a lawyer. But he won’t do her any good. Even if she produces photos of bruises etc, battered wife does not track. Even if we didn’t have the video. They had a good day. There was no tension. They’ve been good lately. The classes were helping. They played puzzles. She was just going to give him 5 minutes. It was the boy crying wolf. She was meant to let him out. She was going to let her abuser out.
Watched replay, thank you for making everything easy to understand and why each side makes certain arguments and love hearing your views. I can’t wrap my head around her videoing him zipped up & her taunting him, but yet she so eagerly gave them her phone and encouraged them to view the videos.
One of the times when he said "I can't breathe" she responded "then you should probably shut the #*@% up." She basically told him the air in his lungs is the last he's going to have, and he's wasting it by begging for his life. To me that shows premeditation. She knew he was dying and gave him some advice for how to eke out a few extra minutes.
She was so scared she mocked him while he died an he wasn't even yelling at her he was saying let me out, I can't breathe and was still calling her babe. 😢
SB really thought if said unintentional that was enough not to be charged with crime. When that was not the case she switched to battered spouse/self defense. It’s so obvious and it’s disgusting.
I’m ready to check out of this cluster f - if there ever is a jury. Trial , verdict- I’m sure I will hear what it is. But I love Peter so I’ll be on other cases. Just can’t do SB anymore.
I imagine that while on the stand, Sara Boone will start out calm but may get rather defensive along the way. But she may surprise us!! As for her wanting makeup, that's not so unusual a request, but Judge Kraynick was not the person to ask. If I heard right, it's Miss Click who handles those matters. LOL! When Owens asked about the makeup, Judge Kraynick paused a couple of seconds before answering. I had to laugh! In either case, this is going to be one very intriguing trial! I think the judge is often very astute, and he is only human but missed the fact that Owens said he's claiming self defence.
Haha yes the judge was frustrated because he already set up clothes for her and it then looked as if sara told her attorney she still needed clothes and he’s like Ms click already met with her! Contact her again.
Blunt force trauma to the head is how she got him in the suitcase and is not unrelated at all. It was proven that he did not have those injuries until that night when he went inside with Sarah. She did that to him. That night. Therefore it is 100% related and is tied to the murder.
Owens claim the detective didn't ask Sarah a question in the end. I figured he meant the female detective didn't ask her if she understood the rights that had been read to her. I went back an listened to the interrogation with Sarah and that question was clearly asked and Sarah answered yes that she indeed did understand.
If she volunteers to go in and talk to them, then they don't have to read her the Miranda card.She wasn't under arrest at that point.Once they told her she was under arrest, they mirandized her.This atty isn't helping her.
It's not battered spouse, because she said over and over again that it was accidental. Never once did she say she killed him on purpose because he beat her and she was scared of him. Now at the last minute all of a sudden she wants to play victim? I'm not buying it.
Sarah Boone is ready for her close-up, Mr. DeMille! Granting of battered spouse syndrome defense is going to bite her in the behind. This will limit the usefulness of all her claims to the cops immediately after the events it was unintentional/accident. That statementment by her lawyer is a bad play.
I don't want to hear a single complaint from Owens about what he has and hasn't had time for. He knew the history of this case and the trial date before taking the case, and he decided to take it anyway for the attention it would bring him. I don't want to hear his whining.
I watched this hearing yesterday and had so many of these same thoughts! The hair makeup and clothes made me laugh too… judge is like “we already set up clothes for her” typical SB saying stuff didn’t happen and this judge ain’t having it!
Please Sarah hair and makeup won’t make a difference. Peter, I didn’t appreciate the State referencing Sarah as if she’s still in her pro se position. The female Detective did do something incorrectly, b/c the male detective put his hand up to stop the female detective before she cuffed her. The female detective didn’t read off a card, but started to read her charges and cuff her before confirming that everything she said was truthful and accurate.
Some of the arguments Owens makes sound like some of the handwritten letters/motions Sarah wrote. Leads me to believe Sarah is leading the charge in her defense (like she always wanted) & Owens is committed now so he has just going along with it. She literally has to change the "not intentional" to "it was intentional". They have to try to get the police interview thrown out because that would screw up her defense.
She’s so hellbent on not having the media involved, to the extent that she wasted all of that time including maps into her letters, but at the same time feels she’s entitled to hair and makeup like this isn’t a MURDER trial?!?
Now that Sarah has legal counsel (again) and she is no longer pro se, does she still get access to the laptop with all the additional usage hours she was granted a few hearings ago?
I'm so impressed by the new attorney here. It's so great that she has awesome representation. That's what it's all about. Let her have the best defense she can. The, if she's guilty, she's unquestionably guilty.
@@mallninja9805 she's got a case of amnesia more like. Forgot he was in there and forgot she was meant to be scared of him...maybe her next 'syndrome' is early onset dementia
I'm sorry, I can't fault the state for taking the position that "nobody told us about battered wife." How many times was Boone blatantly told something and then she claimed she didn't know because of [insert meaningless reason here]. She and her team can get a taste of her own medicine.
He's trying to say up for a continuance and an appeal. At one point he whined that the state was prepared for the BSS crap, and they didn't have to ask for a continuance.
They can suppress the entire interrogation. She was alone with him and zipped him into a suitcase and left him there to die. He didn’t zip himself into that suitcase. She’s guilty. How can she use battered spouse when she said it was an accident about 50 times in the interrogation?
This Lawyer says that he is claiming self defence and says who’s claiming accident? Mate Sarah is. It was NOT INTENTIONAL! She said that over and over and over again.
Listened to the whole hearing yesterday and it was sooooo good! Owens is obviously trying to push for battered spouse defense, but why didn’t Sarah B mention that for 4 years? Lol! Judge brought up some great points and stood his ground. Owens is in over his head. Doesn’t even know when documents were filed.
Peter, I sent you my book about my Dad, Dr. C Henry Kempe, who in 1962 coined the phrase The Battered Child Syndrome in a speech to the American Academy of Pediatrics and was a pioneer in CA. The definitions of Battered Spouse or Battered Woman were taken from that legal definition of child abuse, and adapted from that definition. Of course any kind of abuse to others affects all of those in the circle around a victim. As in CA, it has become overused and randomly applied in defenses. It is strange for me every time I hear "battered" as my Dad used that term to draw attention to a once under-reported or recognized syndrome. Thanks, Annie K
Women were supposed to grin & bear it. I was born during the 50's & recall this era well. Unfortunately it is still a huge problem worldwide. US politics presently have stirred up this problem again, at the conservative level.
I knew as soon as tweedle Dee and tweedle dumb joined her case that they’d do things all 7 or 8 previous lawyers refused to do based on ethical and just common sense reasons Not good faith arguments
Replay crew. I agree he does not need the card to file the Motion To Suppress because there is caselaw that addresses wording needed for Miranda. Poor Mr Owens also needs a better legal secretary or assistant to check the pleadings for simple cut and paste errors. I used to have problems typing trail for trial so I wrote a computer program that would check for that error...
How difficult is it for police officers to read the maranda rights properly? The card is there - JUST READ IT! Its ridiculous to allow a case to even have a hint of descrepancy and this is infuriating.
The judge hammered the defence because the court was under the impression that he’s going to use both defences. The defence did not state they abandoning or dropping the accident part but they keep saying self defence only without dropping the accident part
Not really, when your miranda rights are read to you, you are not free to leave. They knew they were going to arrest her that day before she set foot in that interrogation room because of the video they found on her phone.
The issue for viewers here was that Peter couldn't balance his microphone volume to the court audio by lowering the level/moving mic/speaking more quietly, that's entirely his issue. Broadcasters with considerably less subscribers produced streams with balanced audio.
The defense is going to have to explain to the jury why she lied about it for more than four years. And why their expert witnesses didn't think she was a battered spouse for for years, but changed her mind right before trial. I wish I could be in the room when Owens figures out that the cell phone image that they've had the whole time includes all the information on the cell phone. This hearing is the first time that Owens mentioned that he had requested the card. He did not include that in his motion. It's not the state's fault that he waited until the eleventh hour to mention the wait time for his request.
Owens is trying to model this case after the Marcia Thompson trial. He seems to think both cases are similar with regards to the DV defense. He tried to get the expert michael brannon (sic) but he was unavailable. Judge K is going to have his hands full with Sarah Boone and her stooges.😊
I've been saying this for weeks. Sarah boone is to claim she was afraid of what Jorge would do, so she left him in the suitcase and went upstairs to secure herself. She called Brian to get Jorge out of the suitcase/out of the house. She fell asleep waiting for him (knowing he had a key to her place) . That's why she wasn't worried in the morning. She thought Brian dealt with Jorge, so all was well. It's all bull spit, but I'm so afraid the jury's gonna buy into her crap.
I disagree. O do not see thy jury believing her. She will trip herself up. She is too mean girl and self absorbed and entitled. She will have to tone down the entitlement WAAYYY back. She is in not any the poor shy demure "victim"
Should the jury see to letting her off, that would be an indication they have information that you do not have. You don’t know what may come out in court. I’m just astounded by you and many others who think they know everything! BEFORE the trial!
To me, it's very clear that she got completely wasted, which turned a possible fun night for once bring out all the animosity from the past. I can't see people on the jury not having seen a drunk person who changes once having too many drinks. I do believe that she blacked out and passed out. It is very common for alcoholics to be in denial regarding their drinking. If she had remembered what happened, I would think she would have tried deleting that video. She clearly didnt remember even taking it..sorry, unpopular opinion but it makes more sense altogether
Sarah was like the cat who hangs onto the mouse, not killing it, but holding it hostage. She enjoyed having him confined & under her control. This was up to the point he was begging for his life, getting weaker, telling her he can't breath. She continued to mock him, after he told her he was suffocating. I view her as enjoying the power she had over Jorge. She used the damsel in distress card, to have him arrested repeatedly. Sarah is a predator, she treated Brian the same way. I hope her ex husband testifies truthfully, to the full extent of Sarah's violent nature.
Check out the background of the defense’s reconstruction specialist, Borland. He has quite the criminal past and his medical license has been pulled. Can the prosecution question this in front of jury?
Sarah Boone was definitely intoxicated when she was videotaping the game. Her problem is in her interview, she didn’t , want to admit it. She said they just “shared” a bottle of wine. That was bs. After both getting drunk, decided to play stupid games. Once he got in the suitcase, and both drunk, she was like, aha, I’ll just let you sit for awhile while you beg me to let you out after everything you do to me. Then she winds up passing out. I do not think she did this intentionally. She bailed his ass out just for him to come back home I believe more than once.
No one other than Sarah asked him to take this case. He KNEW the timeline and took the case anyway. However, I believe it can't be an * accident * and that she was in imminent danger .
Sarah Boon was also charged with felony battery by way of strangulation. They both dropped charges on each other. So Boon has as nasty record as George and this. This case can only go one way. By a mile.
Does anybody else think her lawyer is doing all this stuff because it's what she's either pressuring him to do or he thinks he needs to do it to show being aggressive, and he doesn't want to be the millionth lawyer that she's gotten recused or who's quit?
I think he's placating her and this is what she wants to put forth as motions etx and she's not happy getting denied, thinking Owens would get her what she wants. It's ultimately going to be her downfall.
He can't quit. The judge won't allow it this close to trial. At the same time, he's taken on a virtually impossible case, and his best bet seems to try to set up an appeal.
The judge in Carly Gregg was my favorite part of the trial. I haven't watched any trials from Mississippi, maybe they are different there. He said if anyone reacted to verdict he would put them in jail for 30 days😮
Did you see him get mad with the defence yesterday! The trial was a tough one and I think the jury got it right but the judge was great to watch. Definitely no nonsense!
not letting him out when he asked to be let out, is NOT a non action...it IS an action
Exactly. She chose not to let him out. She knew what could happen. She chose NOT to let him out.
@@frelncHe begged !😢
Exactly. Her lack of action is an action in and of itself.
I agree 💯...It was an intentional action of non-action to make him suffer...
@@kittykat3540 Sarah was a mean alcoholic and they were toxic, obviously.
That’s why want her interrogation thrown out. Make sure jury doesn’t know how often she lied.
It's hard to claim battered spouse when Sarah insisted on an accident in the interrogation.
Add the videos to the interrogation-
Her insistence she wasn’t drunk yet seems her former husband’s testimony about her drinking and behavior will show her claim on that to be a potential lie.
I felt like some of the previous attorneys disagreement with her might have been claim of battered spouse with the interrogation & videos
That's the job of the defense. The state has to follow the rules and not violate the defendant's rights. Everyone in law enforcement know this, some don't care (Trooper Proctor). But its important.
@@PurlingQueen Simple response: She didn't know BWS was a defense. She didn't know that if she said "I was afraid to let him out because he would beat me like he did before" that was a valid defense. So naturally, she tried other ways to minimize her culpability (saying she went to sleep, denying she was drunk). That's why you need a lawyer before you talk to the police. A lawyer in Florida would have known that "I fell asleep" was not a defense to depraved heart (because she left him in mortal peril) but would have known that BWS was a possible defense.
@@PurlingQueen the video of the incident she took of herself is pretty damning too, she's literally laughing as he's stuck inside pleading to be let out, saying oh he shouldn't of cheated on her then now he knows how she feels
To make herself attractive and likeable to a jury, Sarah does not need a hairstylist and makeup artist. She needs Jesus, because what she wants is a miracle.
❤❤ this comment. YES!
😂😂😂😂
More like a truckload of sage
zing!
😂😂😂😂
Went back and watched the interrogation Owens was speaking about and the only thing the detective didnt say was the very last sentence you commonly hear"with these rights in mind do you still want to talk with us" but she did ask everything else including"did anyone threaten you etc to talk" and most importantly "do you understand everything i've read to you" and the answer from Sarah was "yes" and she confirmed it wasn't the 1st time she was read her Miranda Rights...not gonna lie Owen's motions were kinda ridiculous but if Sarah is running the ship im not surprised he's making these kinds of arguments🤷🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️Great vid as always❤ & I hope everyone has a wonderful day 🥰
In the car interview, SB wasn't detained or called to the station and willingly got into the cop car to speak with them. They mirandized her even though they were not required to.
When they spoke to SB at the LE station, The detective's had Sarah Boone sign a Waiver of her rights, instead of asking her out loud. I guarantee you that she signed that she understood them and choose to waive her rights and to speak with them anyway.
They could have gone one step further and asked if there was any reason she wished to talk to a lawyer prior to speaking to them, but they were not required to do that. SB thought she could convince them she wasn't at fault so she wanted to talk to them.
Queenofhearts, thanks for explaining. I’m no lawyer but at this point it makes no sense to be arguing about a card! Hadn’t she had Miranda rights read to her more than one time. In 4 years surely she knows what they are.
Her interviews, sworn under oath, directly contradict their defense that she felt that she had to kill him. That's why he's trying to get them thrown out.
@@doom4067that’s a great answer.
Agreed! 👍
This judge and the prosecution are DONE with Boone and her entire Suitcase Syndicate!
The judge filed his order this afternoon denying the states motion to strike bss. Judge also denied stated motion to prevent defense from mentioning BSS in opening statements.
That’s a good thing. Let her present this horrible defense then catch her in a lie.
@@BleuetsBleuets I see a lot of side bars coming up.
@@mandystrong8196Well damn. Although i don’t think it will matter, Boone will be smirking about the “win”
@AmyLou402
Well at least she can’t have a drink to celebrate 🥂 🫤
whenever defense starts picking apart tiny things it is because they have no defense
💯💯💯
Exactly. They've got nothing, and her insistence when the cops arrived at the scene that it was not deliberate - how many times did she tell the officer that? Many. Over and over and over......
Owens isnt SB lawyer--he is her voice. All her other lawyers shot her down like "No Sarah I wont ask the judge for you to have a makeup and hair stylist."
Sarah Boone stated on Video," For all the things you have ever done to me." "Sarah, Sarah," Jorge calls. "That's my name don't wear it out," Says Sarah. Jorge says, "Sarah, I can't breath." "That's the way I felt when you cheated on me." Sarah says. Sarah shows she is punishing him for what he's done.
Sarah forgot she even took a video of the event, how could she remember in detail everything else when she most likely was pass out drunk?
Yes. It was absolutely deliberate. She was punishing him, which I see as a deliberate act. That video is going to sink her.
She remembered, or deleted when she came to and realized she had filmed it.
"By cheating I mean on the phone"
That video is probably going to nail her to the cross….I can’t wait to see how her defense handles that😞🤗🤗🤗
This is a kick in the head to real victims of domestic violence to allow this liar to claim self defense.
What someone says during their trial, has no bearing on other victims, in this big world. Whether you think these others are the “real” victims or fake victims, it’s not their trial. It’s inconsequential. What are you even talking about!
ago
@ cherylj7460 ALL cases serve to set precedents for all later cases, that’s why cases are constantly referenced during motions, etc., because they serve to structure all possible later arguments in all cases to come. Every case/trial absolutely and fundamentally serves as the basis for all later cases…
Agree totally. She got him out of jail over and over she was soo scared of him
@@cherylj7460 It does, though. Actual victims are already blamed and accused of not being sincere. If she is ultimately seen as a faker (which I think she is) that puts even more scrutiny on actual victims. Because oh, really? She was "abused" huh, just like that Sarah Boone chick who murdered her boyfriend was "abused" right?
@@Kim-g8j5s That's pretty common behavior for people who are victims of DV. I suspect based on her level of entitlement and other factors (control of money, etc) that Sarah is more likely abuser than victim. But I don't think her bailing him out is a good indicator either way.
I appreciate your brilliant breakdown of this hearing. As far as their defense: Sarah constantly provoked and attacked the victim then recorded him when he fought back in order to manipulate the situation to make it look like he was abusive. There's absolutely no way she stopped recording if he started threatening her from within the suitcase, and I sure hope the jury recognizes a lie when they hear it.
This defense atty volunteered to take this on & brought all this upon himself❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️
She wants make up and hair done and some nice clothes because she seriously believes she is going to be standing on the Court House Steps giving interviews when she is found not guilty and is set free
Man is she in for a shock.
She DOES! 😮 She’s so intent on a skirt also. She’ll be sitting behind a table, there’s no point! Hair n makeup? She didn’t wear makeup out of jail! She thinks she pulling a Jodi Arias stunt 😂 Uh No Boozey Boone. Prob wants a box of wine for trial too
@@AmyLou402a skirt so she can have you Sharon stone moment flashing the jury. Won't her legs be shackled now that a troupe of interesting bedfellows answered her ad?
The problem with Owens' position is that he wants to know exactly what the state's argument is going to be regarding Mr. Torres' death so that he can fashion a set of facts that runs contrary to it; in other words, he wants to refute everything the prosecution is going to say at trial -- BEFORE the trial.
He SHOULD BE formulating a set of facts as they see them, REGARDLESS of what the prosecution is going to allege, and THAT'S why the state's objecting.
Bc he’s shady!
The two Detectives got Boone to come into the Police Station rather than go out to her place to save her from being arrested in front of her child.
That’s a lie because Lucas was with his dad
She was at The house of her ex husband and son!!!
Idk if the child was even with her ... Might have been in school during that time. May have been with her ex. Idc though. Makes no matter to me. she recorded her actions.
When working as a patrol officer I carried a Miranda card in my shirt pocket and always read it to prevent the motion to suppress.
The problem with the self defense, battered spouse defense is 1. Her record of abuse against her ex and Jorge and 2. Jorge sounds so desperate to get out of the suitcase, he is begging her on the video to let him out, begging for his life and it's HEART BREAKING to hear. She got a video of that but didn't get a video of him threatening her life?? Its because he didn't and she is a liar and an abuser.
Sarah has been doing her own hair her entire life...she can do it now too. How rediculous 🙄🙄🙄
There was no threat
(he wasn't upset) until she refused to let him out !
We don't know what happened leading up to him getting in the suitcase, as the videos didn't begin until he was already inside.
Well we do, unless shes now saying she did lie because she says over and over we had a great night, we playes games and did crafts and i dont know what to tell you guys I simply fell asleep, it was an accident. She says the word accident dozens and dozens of times @dianap5504
@@dianap5504 except Sarah stated multiple times they were having a good time doing a puzzle and drinking wine, she never stated the first day that their was any violence. The defense is truly grasping at straws, I hope Jorge and family get justice!
@@dianap5504Listen to the 911 call. Sarah says SHE put him in the suitcase.
@@dianap5504if she had “put him in there” because he was being dangerous wouldn’t she at least have listed that as one of the reasons why she wouldn’t let him out? While he begged she whined about him cheating. She did not suggest that she couldn’t let him out because of her fear. You know why I think that is? Because she wasn’t afraid. She was not afraid.
Cannot wait for this triallllll
💯
Me too!!! Will be quite interesting 😊
If I was a juror on this case as soon as I hear she purposely went upstairs to bed. That's it for me
You accidently fall asleep by sitting down and falling asleep climbing stairs getting into bed is a deliberate action
ESP after this man was just begging her to let him out!! I mean obviously under any circumstances, that’s when you unzip the suitcase. You don’t just walk away (which by itself is diabolical) and proceed to walk upstairs and climb in bed and drift off to sleep as if no one is zipped inside of a suitcase on your living room floor. The entire thing is just wild to me and there’s not one single thing you can claim as a defense that will make it make sense 🤦🏻♀️
Black out drunk so no intentions. She should plead possesion.
@@supergirl2204 Drunkeness is being possessed by "spirits". Liquor stores used to have signs liquor, wine, spirits. It is mind altering to a point, where you are not your normal self. Our laws do not support being drunk as an excuse in DUI cases.
She wants a hairstylist & make-up artist. The audacity of her. You're going down Looney Booney.😂😂
maybe thats why everone now comparing her to Jodi Arias (that and SB keeps changing her story)
😂😂
That’s just nuts, she’s nuts
@@kneel1when I heard that she was changing her story again, all I could think of was "oh, so we're pulling a page out of the Jodi Arias handbook are we?" I mean, it worked so well for her 😂
She can use Toilet paper rolls and crushed Cheeto’s like every other “alleged” murderer!!
My favorite was when you said to the chat…”why you bringing in all these facts”. 😂 Pesky facts. Always get in the way.
Lol, it reminded if the Nancy Brophy trial when she became so flustered on the stand she said "and I don't even know how to defend myself against the truth." 🤣
@@akane9959 I didn’t see that one. 🙀😂
In the words of Keith Morrison “oh those pesky facts..” 😆
On FOX news they're "Alternative Facts"...........Lies.
Will be crazy to see SB on the stand. She will not do well. Even if comes up with new lies no way she can explain her actions
She'll have to explain why she's been lying for so long about it being unintentional.
She does love to talk, so it'll be interesting for sure!!
Yes I'd say SB is in the drivers seat and she is telling the lawyer what defense he will use in her defense, not him telling her what will and will not be helpful to her. SB is the one asking him to make these ridiculous motions.
Plus shes unaware of how unlikeable she is
Did she say she will testify?
Most definitely want to go through the Carley Gregg trial!!
It was a flucker Cuck. I think they wanted to get her sentenced and forget about all the happy horse plopping surrounding the situation. Unfortunately she's shown herself to be an unreliable narrator, but Idt this outcome is what she was told it would be. She might start talking.
Pissed off kid doesn't just decide to pew pew
This attorney is grasping at straws. If it’s obvious to us, it will be obvious to a jury!
juries are smart. The videos will discredit Sarah
She had a list of questions, including getting her phone back, the kids device , oh and ……the ring off the cold dead hand of the man she murdered. Remember how she was so disappointed she wasn’t getting that ring back. That sounds just like a woman who was terrified of the man she had to kill in self defense.
I’m no one but I think she would have faired better to go with accident. Give her a damn fair trial but this woman is guilty of second degree murder.
I don't believe she had any idea that he would die. These 2 have history of doing bad things to each other. When she said " Now you know how it feels when you choke me" that she knew how violent he could be esp when drinking.
@@GraceVibration interesting. So are you suggesting after this is over that she should be found not guilty? Or lesser like manslaughter?
i agree
@@andsuddenly4252 It doesn't sound like they're suggesting she's not guilty. Just that it's not typical premeditated 1st degree. Manslaughter vs 2nd degree is a harder call for me, partially just because as a non-expert it's not fully clear where the lines are drawn between the types in Florida... I'm very eager to hear the state explain the elements of the charge, and why they believe the evidence supports that.
@@GraceVibration i think she used the word cheat, not choke. its been a while since i've seen that video but i'm fairly certain cheat is the word she used.
Sarah said it was an accident now all of a sudden it was self defense
I legitimately believe that she's been trying to get her 8 previews representatives to argue self defense all along. I think that'd why they kept saying things like "irreconcilable differences" when they were released or flat out quit her case.
“unintentional”
@@rebekahsutton7128 That has been my thought the whole time as well. I know Bankowitz was at least considering it at one point and it was brought up in court, but I think all the other lawyers knew that it would be an outright lie to say this was battered spouse or self defense.
One LE video she said “I put him in the suitcase!” “I zipped him up! Then I fell asleep!” Boom
Thank you Peter for spending over an hour updating us on the SB hearing from yesterday! 💗 I do think that she will have to testify if she is claiming self-defense.
If she claims battered woman syndrome, and if she was so afraid of him, why then did she feel comfortable going up to bed, she wasn’t worried that he would get out and come upstairs? No, I believe she never went upstairs, I believe she tormented him until she was so drunk, passed out and when she woke he was dead! If she was afraid of him, she could have called the cops and then let him out when the cops came…
You are right, she sat on that couch, enjoying his suffering. She is a malicious long term drunk and alcohol is no excuse.
But but SB is not known to ever call 911... ever. Not ever, except for those 27 times "prior".
The female detective left out: Understanding these rights is it your wish to speak to us now?
Sarah confirmed she understood her rights, and she couldn’t wait to start blabbing her fat mouth about how great she is and how much she helped the man she just killed.
She was mirandized in front of her apt by 2 cops; mirandized at the police station on paper, line by line she initialed
each right as they were read, and reminded of them several times during office interrogations. Idiot lawyer had access to all the video tapes. That's what he gets for grabbing a no win case to build up his waining reputation.
He's trying to make more work for the prosecution it seems
25 years ago, my cousin shot her husband to death because she was sick of getting the sh*t outta her. She's still in prison. It pisses me off, really pisses me off, that Boone is trying to use this defense
25 years ago they didn’t have battered spouse defense. I’m so sorry about your cousin. She does not belong in prison!
@mandystrong8196 elements from BWS was used in 1977 in the Francine Hughes case. Aka....Burning Bed.
Only your cousin is a victim? Nobody else.
The Defense atty. said self-defense so low, I'm sure the Judge didn't hear it and why didn't he state self-defense at previous hearings? This atty. and Sarah deserve each other.
Yeah. Hes sarah with a set o' man bits. Kinda funny to see a pro argue as obnoxiously as she does, and as a third grader does.
Ok so bottom line - if she was terrified of his actions when he got out because she was a BS - then she would never have just went up to bed. Never. Who goes to bed knowing or even thinking they may wake up to a beating any moment.
She also hammered home so hars that he could get out. So it doesnt fly that she would take that risk.
When cops ask you to come in and answer some questions, you don't have to you can always stay at home. When she came in to talk , the police were free to ask what they want and use it against her
Here’s your particulars: Jorge died alone stuffed in a hot dark suitcase that Sarah says she told him to get in and then she zipped it up. He begged for air and to get out of that suitcase while Sarah filmed him and laughed and mocked him, and then skipped off to bed as he drew his last painful breathes.
She’s an alcoholic, lying, narcissist. Never said I’m sorry to his family or anybody. It’s all about Sarah and her plight. I’m glad she has a lawyer. But he won’t do her any good. Even if she produces photos of bruises etc, battered wife does not track. Even if we didn’t have the video. They had a good day. There was no tension. They’ve been good lately. The classes were helping. They played puzzles. She was just going to give him 5 minutes. It was the boy crying wolf. She was meant to let him out. She was going to let her abuser out.
Couldn’t have said it better myself👍👍
Watched replay, thank you for making everything easy to understand and why each side makes certain arguments and love hearing your views. I can’t wrap my head around her videoing him zipped up & her taunting him, but yet she so eagerly gave them her phone and encouraged them to view the videos.
Hungover Sarah forgot that Drunk Sarah took the videos.
He didn't sound mad at all in the suitcase, he sounded desperate to breathe. She purposely left him there knowing he would die.
One of the times when he said "I can't breathe" she responded "then you should probably shut the #*@% up." She basically told him the air in his lungs is the last he's going to have, and he's wasting it by begging for his life. To me that shows premeditation. She knew he was dying and gave him some advice for how to eke out a few extra minutes.
@@Nettysgirl_mididn't hear that one... that's vicious. That's the only part the jury would need to hear.
She was so scared she mocked him while he died an he wasn't even yelling at her he was saying let me out, I can't breathe and was still calling her babe. 😢
Yeah!
Here for the algorithm, stayed for the hair stylist. 😊
Sarah needs a defence but Jorge deserves Justice.
SB really thought if said unintentional that was enough not to be charged with crime. When that was not the case she switched to battered spouse/self defense. It’s so obvious and it’s disgusting.
Grasping at straws at this point.
I’m ready to check out of this cluster f - if there ever is a jury. Trial , verdict- I’m sure I will hear what it is. But I love Peter so I’ll be on other cases. Just can’t do SB anymore.
I imagine that while on the stand, Sara Boone will start out calm but may get rather defensive along the way. But she may surprise us!! As for her wanting makeup, that's not so unusual a request, but Judge Kraynick was not the person to ask. If I heard right, it's Miss Click who handles those matters. LOL! When Owens asked about the makeup, Judge Kraynick paused a couple of seconds before answering. I had to laugh! In either case, this is going to be one very intriguing trial! I think the judge is often very astute, and he is only human but missed the fact that Owens said he's claiming self defence.
Sarah Boone probably pressured him to ask the question so that she doesn’t have to lol
Haha yes the judge was frustrated because he already set up clothes for her and it then looked as if sara told her attorney she still needed clothes and he’s like Ms click already met with her! Contact her again.
Blunt force trauma to the head is how she got him in the suitcase and is not unrelated at all. It was proven that he did not have those injuries until that night when he went inside with Sarah. She did that to him. That night. Therefore it is 100% related and is tied to the murder.
I think she knocked him out upstairs. He only weighed 100 -120 lbs when she squeezed him into the suitcase.
Owens claim the detective didn't ask Sarah a question in the end. I figured he meant the female detective didn't ask her if she understood the rights that had been read to her. I went back an listened to the interrogation with Sarah and that question was clearly asked and Sarah answered yes that she indeed did understand.
So he’s full of shit per usual. He’s just going by her word. He probably never even watched the interrogation videos!!!!
It’s the question after that. Even after hearing this do you still want to talk to me. She didn’t ask it but like Peter said it may not matter.
@@lindsayo9702 Okay, I missed that. Thanks.
If she volunteers to go in and talk to them, then they don't have to read her the Miranda card.She wasn't under arrest at that point.Once they told her she was under arrest, they mirandized her.This atty isn't helping her.
It's not battered spouse, because she said over and over again that it was accidental. Never once did she say she killed him on purpose because he beat her and she was scared of him. Now at the last minute all of a sudden she wants to play victim? I'm not buying it.
Sarah Boone is ready for her close-up, Mr. DeMille!
Granting of battered spouse syndrome defense is going to bite her in the behind. This will limit the usefulness of all her claims to the cops immediately after the events it was unintentional/accident. That statementment by her lawyer is a bad play.
She wasnt freaking out. She was punishing him. Said so on the video.
She had the cops on speed dial, she should’ve called this time. I believe she was black out drunk.
Make up on a murderer is still a murderer 😂
Yep!! Like putting lipstick 💄 on a 🐖!
@@kathleenp9643😂
@@kathleenp9643That was exactly what I was gonna say! Beat me to it!
I don't want to hear a single complaint from Owens about what he has and hasn't had time for. He knew the history of this case and the trial date before taking the case, and he decided to take it anyway for the attention it would bring him.
I don't want to hear his whining.
It cracks me up... kinda like the fool who's such a jerk you have to laugh.
I watched this hearing yesterday and had so many of these same thoughts! The hair makeup and clothes made me laugh too… judge is like “we already set up clothes for her” typical SB saying stuff didn’t happen and this judge ain’t having it!
Please Sarah hair and makeup won’t make a difference. Peter, I didn’t appreciate the State referencing Sarah as if she’s still in her pro se position. The female Detective did do something incorrectly, b/c the male detective put his hand up to stop the female detective before she cuffed her. The female detective didn’t read off a card, but started to read her charges and cuff her before confirming that everything she said was truthful and accurate.
Some of the arguments Owens makes sound like some of the handwritten letters/motions Sarah wrote. Leads me to believe Sarah is leading the charge in her defense (like she always wanted) & Owens is committed now so he has just going along with it. She literally has to change the "not intentional" to "it was intentional". They have to try to get the police interview thrown out because that would screw up her defense.
Im surprised she didn't ask for a vase of flowers for the defense table .
😂😂😂 there’s still time yet
Hahaha!!!
I’m so happy that she got these attorneys!!!xoxoxo
She flipped him over is why he died. She said it out of her own mouth she flipped him over.
She’s so hellbent on not having the media involved, to the extent that she wasted all of that time including maps into her letters, but at the same time feels she’s entitled to hair and makeup like this isn’t a MURDER trial?!?
No, she’s entitled to hair and make up because it is a capital case.
SB fired or acted in way to push them away any lawyer who wasn’t willing to do exactly what she says to do, whether true or not. Now has one.
Thank you so much for breaking all of this down
Amazing! She hasn't fired her lawyers yet!
Probably because he is doing exactly what she wants him to do
plus, she likes the attention!!!
He's going with what she wants. Self defence. Obviously everyone else refused this.
Oh yeah 😂😂😂😂😂
He was definitely the battered spouse.
Now that Sarah has legal counsel (again) and she is no longer pro se, does she still get access to the laptop with all the additional usage hours she was granted a few hearings ago?
No, they just recently took it from her. She wasnt happy lol
@@melissasnyder8084HAHAHA! Good! Glad she isn’t happy! 😂
She doesn’t need it now.
She threw a FIT about it and threatened action all that jazz. She's absolutely ridiculous. 😂
@@1PrayerWarrior4Is there a video of that hearing?
I'm so impressed by the new attorney here. It's so great that she has awesome representation. That's what it's all about. Let her have the best defense she can. The, if she's guilty, she's unquestionably guilty.
If Sarah was freaking out, she couldn’t have fallen asleep.
Thats a good one you should be a lawyer
Unless she blames it on that whole 2-3 glasses of wine that got a habitual alcoholic drunk 😂
Maybe she got a case of the vapors & fainted 🤣
Or could have fled and called the police
@@mallninja9805 she's got a case of amnesia more like. Forgot he was in there and forgot she was meant to be scared of him...maybe her next 'syndrome' is early onset dementia
I'm sorry, I can't fault the state for taking the position that "nobody told us about battered wife." How many times was Boone blatantly told something and then she claimed she didn't know because of [insert meaningless reason here]. She and her team can get a taste of her own medicine.
He is wining the hole hearing about the short time. He knew that before he started
He's trying to say up for a continuance and an appeal. At one point he whined that the state was prepared for the BSS crap, and they didn't have to ask for a continuance.
This attorney knew exactly what he was walking into. So no props to him.
They can suppress the entire interrogation. She was alone with him and zipped him into a suitcase and left him there to die. He didn’t zip himself into that suitcase. She’s guilty. How can she use battered spouse when she said it was an accident about 50 times in the interrogation?
@Debthouse. If I remember correctly she is no longer entitled to any of that stuff as she is now represented by an Attorney.
Thanks, Peter!
She wasn’t a battered spouse. She may have been abused but battered spouse is a lot more than that.
This Lawyer says that he is claiming self defence and says who’s claiming accident? Mate Sarah is. It was NOT INTENTIONAL! She said that over and over and over again.
Listened to the whole hearing yesterday and it was sooooo good! Owens is obviously trying to push for battered spouse defense, but why didn’t Sarah B mention that for 4 years? Lol! Judge brought up some great points and stood his ground. Owens is in over his head. Doesn’t even know when documents were filed.
Peter, I sent you my book about my Dad, Dr. C Henry Kempe, who in 1962 coined the phrase The Battered Child Syndrome in a speech to the American Academy of Pediatrics and was a pioneer in CA. The definitions of Battered Spouse or Battered Woman were taken from that legal definition of child abuse, and adapted from that definition. Of course any kind of abuse to others affects all of those in the circle around a victim. As in CA, it has become overused and randomly applied in defenses. It is strange for me every time I hear "battered" as my Dad used that term to draw attention to a once under-reported or recognized syndrome. Thanks, Annie K
What is the title of your book? I'm interested in it!
@@amandamacabre A Good Knight For Children: C. Henry Kempe's Quest to Protect The Abused Child. ( a long title, thanks for asking, Amanda)
Women were supposed to grin & bear it. I was born during the 50's & recall this era well. Unfortunately it is still a huge problem worldwide. US politics presently have stirred up this problem again, at the conservative level.
I knew as soon as tweedle Dee and tweedle dumb joined her case that they’d do things all 7 or 8 previous lawyers refused to do based on ethical and just common sense reasons
Not good faith arguments
Replay crew. I agree he does not need the card to file the Motion To Suppress because there is caselaw that addresses wording needed for Miranda. Poor Mr Owens also needs a better legal secretary or assistant to check the pleadings for simple cut and paste errors. I used to have problems typing trail for trial so I wrote a computer program that would check for that error...
How difficult is it for police officers to read the maranda rights properly? The card is there - JUST READ IT! Its ridiculous to allow a case to even have a hint of descrepancy and this is infuriating.
The judge hammered the defence because the court was under the impression that he’s going to use both defences. The defence did not state they abandoning or dropping the accident part but they keep saying self defence only without dropping the accident part
How does a battered spouse get the victim to comply by allowing a suitcase to be zipped up?
Very interesting day in Court- appreciate you explaining it Peter. Great channel
She was free too walk out at any time. She chose to sit there and answer questions.
Not really, when your miranda rights are read to you, you are not free to leave. They knew they were going to arrest her that day before she set foot in that interrogation room because of the video they found on her phone.
I watched this when it happened, it was the court volume itself, not Peters, not ours
The issue for viewers here was that Peter couldn't balance his microphone volume to the court audio by lowering the level/moving mic/speaking more quietly, that's entirely his issue. Broadcasters with considerably less subscribers produced streams with balanced audio.
The defense is going to have to explain to the jury why she lied about it for more than four years. And why their expert witnesses didn't think she was a battered spouse for for years, but changed her mind right before trial.
I wish I could be in the room when Owens figures out that the cell phone image that they've had the whole time includes all the information on the cell phone.
This hearing is the first time that Owens mentioned that he had requested the card. He did not include that in his motion. It's not the state's fault that he waited until the eleventh hour to mention the wait time for his request.
It turns my stomach trying anything to get her off.
But how satisfying will it be when she doesnt?
Owens is trying to model this case after the Marcia Thompson trial. He seems to think both cases are similar with regards to the DV defense. He tried to get the expert michael brannon (sic) but he was unavailable. Judge K is going to have his hands full with Sarah Boone and her stooges.😊
All defense attorneys act like that. It doesn't mean their client is innocent.
Makeup? Does she think she’s in a beauty salon instead of jail? She really is crazy?😜
It didn't seem unreasonable for trial. For the same reason that defendants don't appear in prison jump suits.
I've been saying this for weeks. Sarah boone is to claim she was afraid of what Jorge would do, so she left him in the suitcase and went upstairs to secure herself. She called Brian to get Jorge out of the suitcase/out of the house. She fell asleep waiting for him (knowing he had a key to her place) . That's why she wasn't worried in the morning. She thought Brian dealt with Jorge, so all was well. It's all bull spit, but I'm so afraid the jury's gonna buy into her crap.
I disagree. O do not see thy jury believing her. She will trip herself up. She is too mean girl and self absorbed and entitled. She will have to tone down the entitlement WAAYYY back. She is in not any the poor shy demure "victim"
Should the jury see to letting her off, that would be an indication they have information that you do not have. You don’t know what may come out in court. I’m just astounded by you and many others who think they know everything! BEFORE the trial!
To me, it's very clear that she got completely wasted, which turned a possible fun night for once bring out all the animosity from the past. I can't see people on the jury not having seen a drunk person who changes once having too many drinks. I do believe that she blacked out and passed out. It is very common for alcoholics to be in denial regarding their drinking. If she had remembered what happened, I would think she would have tried deleting that video. She clearly didnt remember even taking it..sorry, unpopular opinion but it makes more sense altogether
Sarah was like the cat who hangs onto the mouse, not killing it, but holding it hostage. She enjoyed having him confined & under her control. This was up to the point he was begging for his life, getting weaker, telling her he can't breath. She continued to mock him, after he told her he was suffocating. I view her as enjoying the power she had over Jorge. She used the damsel in distress card, to have him arrested repeatedly. Sarah is a predator, she treated Brian the same way. I hope her ex husband testifies truthfully, to the full extent of Sarah's violent nature.
Check out the background of the defense’s reconstruction specialist, Borland. He has quite the criminal past and his medical license has been pulled. Can the prosecution question this in front of jury?
His background is wild! How can he even be allowed to testify?
@@lindsayo9702Right!?? Makes no sense.
Thanks for doing the Gregg case was well.
Sarah Boone was definitely intoxicated when she was videotaping the game. Her problem is in her interview, she didn’t , want to admit it. She said they just “shared” a bottle of wine. That was bs. After both getting drunk, decided to play stupid games. Once he got in the suitcase, and both drunk, she was like, aha, I’ll just let you sit for awhile while you beg me to let you out after everything you do to me. Then she winds up passing out. I do not think she did this intentionally.
She bailed his ass out just for him to come back home I believe more than once.
I have no doubt that she will testify on her own case . It's her 15 min of fame. She won't miss her spot to let us all know it wasn't intentional....
No one other than Sarah asked him to take this case. He KNEW the timeline and took the case anyway. However, I believe it can't be an * accident * and that she was in imminent danger .
I love how he said no one give spoiler on the order and yet people are ruining it...
Sarah Boon was also charged with felony battery by way of strangulation. They both dropped charges on each other. So Boon has as nasty record as George and this. This case can only go one way. By a mile.
This trial is gonna be bonkers!
Peter you're a fair minded guy, balanced audio is as important to the viewer, as a balanced perspective is when listening to the evidence.
It is not the states job to do your job. You have three lawyers and two assistance get your job done you accepted the job you got the job.
Exactly!
Does anybody else think her lawyer is doing all this stuff because it's what she's either pressuring him to do or he thinks he needs to do it to show being aggressive, and he doesn't want to be the millionth lawyer that she's gotten recused or who's quit?
I think he's placating her and this is what she wants to put forth as motions etx and she's not happy getting denied, thinking Owens would get her what she wants. It's ultimately going to be her downfall.
@@1PrayerWarrior4 Yes, exactly. He's placating her by acting like he's some junkyard dawg.
He can't quit. The judge won't allow it this close to trial.
At the same time, he's taken on a virtually impossible case, and his best bet seems to try to set up an appeal.
No SB isn’t directing this
The judge in Carly Gregg was my favorite part of the trial. I haven't watched any trials from Mississippi, maybe they are different there. He said if anyone reacted to verdict he would put them in jail for 30 days😮
Did you see him get mad with the defence yesterday! The trial was a tough one and I think the jury got it right but the judge was great to watch. Definitely no nonsense!
I loved Judge Dewey!
@@dianewillson4535has that trial ended ? What was the verdict ?
@@ellabella6099guilty. Life sentence
@@feliciacooper6263thank you ❤