Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Part 14 " with Pr. Jean Ross | Granite Bay Hilltop SDA Church
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 авг 2024
- Understanding Daniel Chapter 8 with Pr. Jean Ross | Granite Bay Hilltop SDA Church
For more information contact:
/ granitebaychurch
www.granitebays...
office@granitebaysda.org
Amen pastor love your teaching
Incredible power to discern the Word.
I would like to know where’s Chapter 7 verse by verse study lesson?
at 25:00 the question about the time being a time like never before, if you read, i believe it was Josephus, recorded how when Titus returned siege walls were built around Jerusalem, desiring to starve the Jews to surrender, there were 2 factions within the city, the zealots and those who followed the more traditional leaders. which one did it is not fully known, but is believed to be the zealots, set fire to the food supplies of the others causing starvation to the point that those inside began to kill and eat the pets inside first and then some turned to cannibalism of the young. i can't recall exactly where it is in scripture, but there is a prophecy of turning to eating their young. some inside of the zealots did escape Jerusalem and went to Herod's other site at Masada, where in, i believe was 73AD, where surrounded by the Romans again, instead of being killed by the Romans or taken captive committed suicide. i would say that constitutes a time of trouble not known before.
a time of trouble not "known" before
Doesn't this guy know the word "sacrifice" in Dan 8:11-13 is a supplied word, not found in the original text? Same as in Dan 11:31 - the word "sacrifice" is not there in the original. It is the daily "desolation" vs the abomination of "desolation" is obviously meant in 11:31. The phrase "that maketh desolate" (KJV - also translated as "desolation" in Matt 24, Mark 13 from the Greek) in the original Hebrew is "šāmēm" - "to be appalled, be awestruck", "amazed", "astounded" as well as "to be made desolate". BTW "erēmōsis" (Matt 24:15) is pretty much an accurate translation.
In which case the "daily" does NOT refer to the Jewish sacrificial system at all. The references would apply to a transition from the daily, appalling desolation of the Pagan religion of Ancient Rome to the abomination of the appalling desolation of Papal Rome.
what i have found is that those who claim Antiochus Epiphanes as the little horn in Daniel 8 split the 2300 days in two making it 1150 days. they do this because at the end of the explanation it says, "the vison of the evenings and the mornings is true." they pull this out to be a reference to the daily evening and morning sacrifices in the sanctuary. yet i see no mention to this being in reference to sacrifices but to the day, what constitutes a day, the evening and the morning. when Jesus told the disciples regarding the temple and not one stone being left on top of another, to the "abomination of desolation," (which is rightly translated "abomination that makes desolate) He was pointing to a future time, 70AD. i have looked for any information online to find where Antiochus caused any desolation, destruction to the temple and so far have found none. yes he did some abominable things by erecting a statue of Zeus and sacrificing a pig on the burnt altar, but no destruction of any kind to the temple.
Can't be Antiochus. The ram in Dan 8:4 "became great". The he-goat in 8:8 "waxed (grew) VERY great". But the little horn (verse 9) became "exceeding great". Antiochus' empire was NEVER greater than the Medo-Persian or Grecian Empires.
Also the little horn was to stand against "the Prince of the host" (verse 11) interpreted by Gabriel as "the Prince of princes" (verse 25). It was during the reign of Tiberius Caesar that Jesus was crucified and also the temple in Jerusalem was destroyed - "the place of his sanctuary was cast down." (verse 11)
The little horn in chapter 8 is Ancient/Pagan Rome. But there is a hint of a transition into Papal Rome in verse 12.
Gabriel was called to explain the prophecy to Daniel (verse 16) but only got as far as this. He could not finish the interpretation at this time because Daniel had fainted and was sick for several days afterwards (verse 27). The 2,300 day prophecy was simply said to be "true" (verse 26) but actually explained later in chapter 9. The word "days" in verse 26 is "yom" which means "a day, as defined by by evening and morning in Genesis 1", but can also mean "time period" and "year". So 2,300 time periods or years is also meant. The bible uses the words "days" and "years" synonymously with each other in many places.
(Edited for spelling)
Where's your verse by verse study of chapter 7?
Yeah I thought that was missing too. Maybe it wasn't recorded?
Where is chapter 7 ?
He intended not to include Chapter 7, since their is a teaching of the sda that Daniel 7"24-25 refers to the Papacy. To scape from the lies that is why he did not include it. hahaha
@@bumblebee1681 That's not just SDA teaching. Mid 1500s many Protestant students of prophecy came to the same conclusion. This was a good 300 years before the SDA church even existed.