Leica 50mm Noctilux f1.0 vs f0.95 vs f1.2. Also Nikon Z 50mm f1.2 & Nikkor 58mm Noct f1.2 - BIG $$

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 10

  • @RobertFalconer1967
    @RobertFalconer1967 Год назад +5

    So the chief takeaway from this video is that Nikkor lenses are no joke.

    • @Adventure8
      @Adventure8  Год назад +1

      Yes, old glass is still good glass.

  • @brianhohmann4275
    @brianhohmann4275 Год назад +1

    Great comparison, very helpful!!! I actually went for the Nikon 58mm after watching your videos. Sharp in the middle, beautiful falloff. I own a bunch of different platforms in both film and digital. When shooting digital, so far my favorite lenses for portraiture have been the 55mm 1.4 Zeiss Otus shot on the Nikon Z9 and 50mm 1.4 Summilux M (2023) shot on the Leica M11M. Lets see what the 58mm looks like adapted to the Leica.

    • @Adventure8
      @Adventure8  Год назад

      Wow, congratulations on your purchase of the 58mm. No doubt a great investment. Well done.

    • @johnkasianowicz6536
      @johnkasianowicz6536 Год назад

      I’d love to know how that works out.

  • @johnkasianowicz6536
    @johnkasianowicz6536 Год назад +1

    I have several Leica cameras and a good number of their lenses, but I still have most of my old Nikon glass. I regret selling my Nikkor AIS 85 mm f/1.4.

    • @Adventure8
      @Adventure8  Год назад

      Only one solution. Better go and buy one. Can never have too much gear. Thanks for watching.

  • @GillesQuennevilleGQ
    @GillesQuennevilleGQ 6 месяцев назад +1

    I own an 0.95 and a 1,4 Summilux. I prefer the Summilux. Just a question of personal feeling. Both are outstaning.

    • @Adventure8
      @Adventure8  6 месяцев назад +1

      Yes the Summilux is more versatile and lighter than the 0.95. I find the same.