The Works of T.S. Eliot 17: The Hollow Men

A discussion of T.S. Eliot's "The Hollow Men" from the online course Classics of American Literature: T.S. Eliot, taught by Duke University English Professor Victor Strandberg.

[@carolnelson934]

I am studying on my own at home in subjects I have not been able to before. I greatly appreciate your posts which have expanded my understanding immeasurably!

[@tsgoogle9583]

Excellent lecture. A poem I've read many times, its imagery never fails to move me, but much of the allusions, the symbolism in the wording were beyond me until I saw this video. It really adds to the appreciation of this incredible piece of literature.

[@esejsnake1503]

I thank you for the solemnity of this analysis.
After having seen a few other men approach this poem (one of the most heartbreakingly sad poems in existence) with loud conviction and, if I may say so, somehow ignorant shouting, this video is a pleasant suprise.

[@vikvedgaming5036]

good on ya mate doing gods work

[@liz8129]

This is helping me so much than it did in my actual class.

[@TacticsTechniquesandProcedures]

Thank you for the perspective.

[@graceneff9311]

This has been infinitely more helpful than any other analysis I have come across.

[@alexylorenaruizbernardos8132]

Thank you so much for your analysis. It’s been really helpful and eye opening

[@nicholastamayo6029]

29:43 But in the case of Guy Fawkes, would it not be more apt to say that he reflects the anticipation of a bang that ultimately ends in a failure? He tried to go out with a bang, to blow up the parliament of England, but instead ended with a whimper, falling off the scaffold he was supposed to be hung upon and breaking his neck. The same with Kurtz: he also anticipated a "bang" and ended with a whimper if you think about it. He most likely went to Africa wanting to bring glory to England and himself, but instead had to die in a humiliating, anti-climactic way and have his legacy saved by Marlowe, who had to lie to his wife about his true nature.

[@mortemoccasus2412]

Good onr

[@purpledanny1958]

Extraordinarily clear and convincing illustration. My only doubt is the meaning of the many 'kingdoms" in the poem(around 10:00). I think "death's other kingdom“ refers to Paradise, not the realm of Death.

[@samiaitani118]

Thank you so much for the clear analysis

[@CaliforniaDreamer-z5z]

Thank you sir. Well done.

[@saqo629]

shot for the analysis mate!

[@stewartconacher6552]

A very impressive lecture on a very interesting poem.

[@zacharysorrentino3245]

Great analysis.

[@horkosofdonso7624]

[...] “the dead land the stone images are raised” [...]
I totally jumped the gun on that one. Thought he meant grave stones whe he said the ‘stone images are raised.’
It made a lot more sense before.

[@richardjones7984]

Thank you for this well read and very clear explanation of the poem. It is often quoted and because of that I sent it to a friend to highlight the lack of loud voices speaking out against the very obvious negative effect of certain medical procedures that are resulting in unnecessary deaths. I now realize that my selection of the poem was much more astute than an impulsive gesture.

[@jameskelson8060]

NERD

[@Samboyant]

You're truly the stuffed filling us the hollow, with thy knowledge.

[@K_F_fox]

Reading Eliot along side the Trial and Death of Socrates and Sartre's "Nausea," it seems that Eliot's use of body parts disconnected from bodies, and especially "essences" in this poem ("Shape without form shade without colour,"), is reductio ad absurdum of Platonism. Am I seeing something Eliot is trying to communicate, or just reading between the lines because of how many concurrent lines I'm reading?

[@metalinl-a1128]

A Naturalistic Intellect.
Perhaps... a bit more inflection, if I may be so bold, sir...
Subscribed

[@valerieyung6546]

so what exactly are the 2 voices? kinda bmbiguous or maybe im bad at listneing

[@2deadly748]

Well, he said that it's about the opposition between a naturalistic intellect and a desire for a spiritual/religious dimension to life. Presumably, the two voices should reflect that opposition but I agree that it is not specifically stated.

[@recluse-guy.1547]

human or Robart?????

[@stevenyourke7901]

What’s with the headphones?

[@carolinafine8050]

I notice this tendency for reviewers to write in their own religious interpretation of Eliot but rarely taking him at face his own beliefs… beliefs that he was very much steadfast with

[@carolinafine8050]

“If we follow the Hindu commandments”…. Sorry, but Eliot was a professed Christian. Write your own poem if you feel that strongly about it. Don’t shoehorn your beliefs into Eliot