Seagull 1963 Bronze 38mm LUME EDITION

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 10 дек 2024

Комментарии • 60

  • @meenoz
    @meenoz 8 месяцев назад +3

    Gosh, this brings back memories. I remember my grandfather owned a Seagull. It was the pride and joy of my hometown, Tianjin.

  • @אלכסס-ח5ג
    @אלכסס-ח5ג Год назад +6

    Its nice and kinda impresive that they listen to the feedbacks and can make a watch that fast. Personaly i already have the "regular" 1963 and im not gonna spend that kind of money on basically the same watch just for the lume and a bronze case.

  • @ArmandBisho
    @ArmandBisho Год назад +1

    In my opinion this watch is one of the best values in watch industry great job Seagull
    Peter thanks for good review.

  • @HaonProductions
    @HaonProductions Год назад +1

    If I didn't already have a Seagull 1963, I'd definitely consider this! It's a little bulbous because the lugs are shorter and the case is thick, but I think it works well. These Seagulls are always gorgeous and this one just makes it better!

  • @WATCHingJames
    @WATCHingJames Год назад +2

    I like this in bronze. Probably more than the original

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад

      I think it will look great when it patinas 👍

  • @wdou451
    @wdou451 Год назад +1

    Thank you for another great video. I was hoping to buy one, but I've been holding back for some reason. Thanks to your close-up shots, your thoughts, and the pros and cons of this watch. I decided to pass on this purchase. I'm a spontaneous spender, and sometimes I end up with lots of regret buys. Your video helped me scratch that itch and shine a light on the minor imperfections that stopped me from wasting away my watch fund. Every time I watch your watch reviews it feels like I'm actually holding the watch. I'm your biggest fan!! Cheers

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад +1

      Thats one thing I hope to show people is the positives and negatives of a potential purchase...
      I think at the end of the day we all end up with way too many watches and just as many regrets.
      Very hard to avoid those pitfalls...glad I could help 🙏

  • @nikkolomakaveli8295
    @nikkolomakaveli8295 Год назад +1

    Gorgeous watch

  • @eggsII
    @eggsII Год назад +2

    At first glance, this one looks like a stunner under your lens. I’ve tried to maintain some specific standards for watches that I buy (minimum water resistance, screw down crown) and I prefer watches that are 12mm thick or less. Chronos tend to be thicker, I know. I want to. I really do… but…

  • @PaulewingStHelens
    @PaulewingStHelens Год назад +1

    I bought the limited edition version. I think this kinda discredits “limited edition” That said I love the watch. It’s one of the few if not only watch that people comment on when I wear it. I do think the strap on this one is nicer looking though. Excellent vid.

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад

      Thanks for sharing Paul..👍

  • @Z-S-H
    @Z-S-H Год назад +2

    That is a gorgeous watch at a decent price in my honest opinion GREAT COVER and happy thanksgiving :D

  • @jonahhekmatyar
    @jonahhekmatyar Год назад +1

    I've been holding off on getting a seagull mostly because I'm not a fan of how polished stainless cases look on my wrist. So I'm probably going to get one of these.😅

  • @anamisidro8453
    @anamisidro8453 Год назад +1

    Thank you for the video.

  • @CornelisWH4303
    @CornelisWH4303 Год назад +2

    Good presentation video of this bronze chronograph. However, one of the most important properties of the mechanical movement is not mentioned. It is a column wheel chronograph and that is absolutely unique in this price range! For other brands, think of 10K and up.

  • @LymanPhillips
    @LymanPhillips Год назад +1

    Im normally not into bronze cases, but i really like rhis one. The vintage style and the bronze suits it. I'm not going to purchase one b3cause thats a lot of money for an St19 that's known to be a crapshoot for reliability, but this is a nice release.

  • @Justme0495
    @Justme0495 Год назад

    I have the 60th anniversary model and love it. I'm usually not a bronze watch type guy.. but it works here. However I think the lume sections on the hands do look a bit odd, although I like the idea of having lume in general. But not enough for me, to buy it 'again'. Great review, als always though!

  • @Anirossa
    @Anirossa Год назад +1

    Applied markers look oddly identical to the ones found on the seiko alpinist

  • @threethrushes
    @threethrushes Год назад +1

    The Seagull 63 got be back into watches after a 20 year gap.
    Since that purchase I've become a polyaddict - my drug of choice is Sinn.

  • @typebflieger
    @typebflieger Год назад +3

    Great review, Pete. I think releasing this model in bronze is a great idea. One thing that I can’t get past is that extra tall bezel on the sapphire model. It makes the case wear much taller. Unfortunately they haven’t released a bronze version in an acrylic crystal, which has a taller domed crystal and a much lower-profile bezel. That would’ve been a killer combo, aesthetically, but people want their sapphire, even on watches they wear once a month, so what can you do?

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад +3

      That would be nice, acrylic with a bronze case...especially when it ages..wow 👍

    • @MattSeesGray
      @MattSeesGray Год назад

      I don’t understand what you mean by “having a taller crystal with a smaller profile”. Maybe I’m just misunderstanding, but I don’t understand you mean that the profile would be smaller with an taller crystal.

    • @pokie6087
      @pokie6087 Год назад

      These are great watches but not without reliability issues. The problems arise with a lot of chronograph use. Although it doesn't feel it, when you reset the chrono hands you're putting a big shock through the movement which takes its toll on other components over time.
      Of course this is the case with all mechanical chronographs, but the ST19's are quite fragile and particularly susceptible. If you use it purely as a time keeper with VERY occasional stop watch use, you'll be absolutely fine.

    • @typebflieger
      @typebflieger Год назад

      @@MattSeesGrayIf you look at profile shots of the steel versions with acrylic and sapphire crystals, you can see the difference. The height of both is about the same, but because the acrylic has a more pronounced dome, the bezel isn’t as high and bulky. On the sapphire version, the crystal is much less domed, so the bezel is a lot higher to meet the edge of the crystal. Adding such a large bezel to the sapphire version makes the side of the watch appear much thicker than the acrylic version. Compare the photos, and it will be obvious.

  • @felo6035
    @felo6035 Год назад

    Great review Pete. Overall this is a very nice version of this watch. I prefer, and own, the steel version with the acrylic crystal. Thank you for sharing my friend. Cheers.

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад +1

      Thanks for watching Rafa, be well mate

    • @felo6035
      @felo6035 Год назад

      ​@@PeterKotsa👍🙌

  • @michaelcollins2473
    @michaelcollins2473 Год назад +1

    I kind of like it. I don't love it, but I'd definitely like to see it/try it out in real life....

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад +1

      It’s built well and looks the part

  • @yvesleroy5740
    @yvesleroy5740 Год назад +1

    Will wait for version 2 ... Bit too thick and expensive I agree

  • @tonyxxx9463
    @tonyxxx9463 Год назад

    I've always liked the liked the look of these, well in the stainless steel version, but this bronze one does stand out and I like it better than the normal version. Definitely one to think about as I still need a good mechanical chrono. Cheers Peter, another great review and another watch to to add to an ever growing list😂😂😂

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад +1

      That list must be pages long now brother..😂

    • @tonyxxx9463
      @tonyxxx9463 Год назад

      @@PeterKotsa As long as you’re arm bro

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад +1

      @@tonyxxx9463 Hahahahahahaha

  • @GalorOffroad
    @GalorOffroad Год назад +2

    Not bad, but I prefer the classic model and with a vintage acrylic crystal 🙂 It is a shame that the pin buckle is not bronze... This new strap is nice tho.

  • @timetowatch_francois
    @timetowatch_francois Год назад +1

    Thanks for sharing this beautiful movement ... for the price? ... A mechanical chrono? ... Great deal! 🙂
    I don't know if you plan on keeping this one but it would be nice to see the change in patina after a few months.
    Maybe a suggestion for a future review (?) - Appreciate your insight my friend. Hope all is well in your neck of the woods.

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад +1

      Thanks Francois, hope your well too bro

  • @juniorjohnson5961
    @juniorjohnson5961 Год назад +2

    I have the steel version with acrylic crystals Paid $178 . I wouldn't buy this at that price . Thanks Peter 👍

  • @AndrewsWizardlyReads
    @AndrewsWizardlyReads Год назад +1

    I really wanted the limited run and was sad when I couldn’t get it.

  • @seyidhantoprak7301
    @seyidhantoprak7301 Год назад

    Aliexpresste satılan seagul 1963 ler sahtemi acaba bilen var mı?

  • @ozzy1154
    @ozzy1154 Год назад +1

    I want to buy a seagull 1963 in 38mm, it’s the perfect size for me. But I simply cannot get over the fact that these red star or sugess models that come in 38mm are basically homages. The actual seagull company sells the real deal, only in a larger size, no sapphire, no display caseback, for a ridiculous price, and it just simply does not appeal to me. But I can’t in good faith buy a homage.

  • @Ruby_Sterling
    @Ruby_Sterling Год назад +1

    I wish it was gold. Bronze + oxidation = nope

  • @tenshin2002
    @tenshin2002 Год назад

    I think the hour hand is too long.

  • @leonm2407
    @leonm2407 Год назад +1

    Too expensive in my view, but to all that own one, enjoy.

  • @artieshell9205
    @artieshell9205 Год назад

    The hour hand is far too long. Needs to be a lot shorter to differentiate from minute hand at a glance.

  • @iTheShirt
    @iTheShirt 9 месяцев назад

    The niggles.

  • @chronospeedster1916
    @chronospeedster1916 Год назад +2

    439€ AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH is this a joke? LMAO

  • @benthompson2959
    @benthompson2959 10 месяцев назад

    DO NOT BUY! These watches are dodgy as. I have had 2 now which don’t keep time and just stop when timing. Each time seagull refuse to accept anything is wrong and will not give a refund. It’s not worth your money!

  • @9426sunny
    @9426sunny Год назад +2

    Everything is good except the dial...Too much Chinese Communist smell..

  • @johnrb9397
    @johnrb9397 Год назад +7

    I feel for those that went for a limited watch in the initial run 🫣

  • @MercilessGuitar151
    @MercilessGuitar151 Год назад +2

    I didn't think they could make watches that ugly.

  • @jonahhekmatyar
    @jonahhekmatyar Год назад

    Ahhhhhhhh Sold Out! 🥲
    (Nevermind, it's been re-released)