Are you he is not an idiot? The real test is, how much will be wasted or not eaten. Being a good neoliberal libertarian, he is providing a false economics on the school lunch programme so he can look good to his adoring supporters.
Hoskins nailed it….so much wastage…feeding overweight teachers…why bring your lunch when you get a free lunch on the taxpayer…eh. Long holidays,short hours,free lunches….big pay….and yet the children can’t read and write or add up very well. Teachers waddling back to the staff room with a couple of spare taxpayer lunches for themselves and some to take home as well. Lol….thank goodness for Seymour.
But Mike is not telling you the bad news. The last 11 months of this all talk non transparent government as about austerity, inflation, businesses failing, poor exports, high rents, food prices increasing, increased unemployment, more people leaving, etc. If the last 11 months were bad, the next 12 months wont be any better.
Well done, btw I can afford to feed myself lunch for $3.50 a day, less my labour. But I’m sure if I could scale it to governmental level it would be a piece of cake.
if it's not the cost being complained about its the contents in the meals , oh ' there's not enough fruit or , why wasn't there a option for sushi ' really , idk any kid who is overly joyful for sushi ......
It’s crazy, they seem to have forgotten that it’s free. The parents are welcome to supplement the meals with extras if they’re concerned it’s lacking something
@@caravanstuff2827 if we’re feeding genuinely hungry children Im pretty sure content of the meals isn’t going to be a massive point of contention. They’re getting calories on the tax payers and individual businesses dime, I thought a little gratitude would be a more appropriate response than the whining we instead are getting
Maybe David could save even more money by replacing taxpayer funded catering for MPs with the same food the kids are getting. But then a certain PM would say "no way, we're entitled." At least the money saved with providing the kids with lesser quality food can go to funding the six figure salaries for bureaucrats working at David's new Ministry for Regulations.
This guy is beyond normal. Spent couple of hours of his time, in 6 months saved tax payers $140 Million. In the Wellington POST, children were asked about a taste test, would thy eat this again. Given around 7.5 /10. Well, he can always open a restaurant when he's sick of being an MP! The great results he touched with his fingers. Taste test for Principles Bill argument? Might also get 7.5/10!!
If you can't afford to feed your children don't have them. Extreme circumstances can be helped by family and community. But there are NO free lunches in life.
Good that Mike doesn’t address any potential nutritional gaps, the company that theyve contracted have a history of poor food quality, racking business away from locals etc. Classic
@@tarrasacid1612and what's that's got to do with it . Parents cant afford to feed there children don't have them . Some parents breed like rabbits then complain they can't afford to support them 😂
Seymour should eat those lunches for a month - he’ll provide those in the Beehive - did you see the food? Not a vegetable in sight. Mike would not even feed this to his dog.
These lunches are to feed hungry kids who otherwise could not concentrate in class. The lunch programme is not a "warm fuzzies" addition to the generous welfare grants available.
They might have done a good job. Yet to be seen. I'm left wondering if it's really $3 a pop, then is someone getting screwed in the chain? I'm sure efficiencies could be had, but i'm not convinced it could be done this fast or easily.
Compass Catering will be making a good profits on his school lunches, as Compass is known for paying low wages and providing average some what bland meals. The real test is, how much will be wasted or not eaten.
@@rogermail7060 - Compass Catering will be making a good profits on his school lunches, as Compass is known for paying low wages and providing average some what bland meals. The real test is, how much will be wasted or not eaten.
My God, this guy Hoskings looks like he has the biggest hangover and just fell out of bed and grabbed the nearest tee-shirt and threw a "unthoughtful" jacket. Please, treat us with a bit of respect, or just stay on the radio, where we don't have to look at you!
Wow nasty leftist. He puts that lying communist on his show from the US in the morning to satisfy you lefty lunatics. Is that not enough to curb you anger!
@@helenlizzystewart4908 the truth is he is actually very vain and his clothes cost a small mortgage....the new elite simply get paid so much they dont care what you peasants think
Awesome. David is no idiot. i like that guy more and more.
Are you he is not an idiot? The real test is, how much will be wasted or not eaten. Being a good neoliberal libertarian, he is providing a false economics on the school lunch programme so he can look good to his adoring supporters.
Let's face it, Labour were shite.
They were great at spending printed money
Still are☝
Labour would have to improve 1000% before they could reach the lofty goals of shit.
That's putting it politely.
Thank you Mr Seymour , good job , kids get fed and we save millions, what’s to moan about , nothing , that’s what
Seymour and his Helpers are wot This country needs.
Yeah i,d like to see you eat that shit
Nailed it Mike 💡
David Seymour for Prime Minister.
Well done Seymour. In saying that, if you can't afford to feed your children don't have them. No excuses, that's just common sense.
Correct, does this mean kids starve during the holidays when they’re not in school?
What a woke comment.
@@suziederkins3310 good call! Worth thinking about.
Exactly right.
@@Astrodoberman - Yeah right.
Hoskins nailed it….so much wastage…feeding overweight teachers…why bring your lunch when you get a free lunch on the taxpayer…eh.
Long holidays,short hours,free lunches….big pay….and yet the children can’t read and write or add up very well.
Teachers waddling back to the staff room with a couple of spare taxpayer lunches for themselves and some to take home as well.
Lol….thank goodness for Seymour.
When I was at school my parents provided it , trouble with Aotearoa too many useless parents on the gravy train
Let’s see comrade Maiki cover this in the news, yeah right
Still $300 million too much. It’s not my job to feed other people’s children: it’s their job.
you do realise that you subsidise politicians food...?
@@steveharris5008 you do realise the trade off.....?
@@Astrodoberman which is..? and just pointing out that you are feeding other peoples grown children...
Selfish and ignorant - get an education.
With Seymour in the Prime Minister's seat there would be no stopping him. It would be fair and just for all NZers, which is how it should be.
Imagine being this guy, a life full of regrets but never takes the time to stop and think why that might be.
Where was the media calling out Labour over this?
Finally Mike turned the corner as well and finally tells the truth about the horrendous Labour/Green government.
What are you on about? He's been calling out their corruption and incompetence from day one
@@TheScottstar101 Then I lived on another planet.
@@BjornFlower-qx9ur probably
@@helenlizzystewart4908 Or you?
But Mike is not telling you the bad news. The last 11 months of this all talk non transparent government as about austerity, inflation, businesses failing, poor exports, high rents, food prices increasing, increased unemployment, more people leaving, etc. If the last 11 months were bad, the next 12 months wont be any better.
Well done, btw I can afford to feed myself lunch for $3.50 a day, less my labour. But I’m sure if I could scale it to governmental level it would be a piece of cake.
Aw God I always Love listening to your take on things NZ...Onya Mike! ...Keep it up
if it's not the cost being complained about its the contents in the meals , oh ' there's not enough fruit or , why wasn't there a option for sushi ' really , idk any kid who is overly joyful for sushi ......
It’s crazy, they seem to have forgotten that it’s free. The parents are welcome to supplement the meals with extras if they’re concerned it’s lacking something
Agreed.. it's one meal a day.. it's just a hole filler!!!.
@@caravanstuff2827 if we’re feeding genuinely hungry children Im pretty sure content of the meals isn’t going to be a massive point of contention.
They’re getting calories on the tax payers and individual businesses dime, I thought a little gratitude would be a more appropriate response than the whining we instead are getting
Totally unnecessary for free school lunches but even as a kid sushi was hands down my favourite meal for any occasion.
, hungry people eat bread, thirsty people drink water.
Well said
And the food wasn’t what kids would even eat
Spot on
I do not understand the fiscal
Cliff argument. Things get funded for a certain amount of time and then it’s budget time again sooo what’s the problem
Maybe David could save even more money by replacing taxpayer funded catering for MPs with the same food the kids are getting. But then a certain PM would say "no way, we're entitled." At least the money saved with providing the kids with lesser quality food can go to funding the six figure salaries for bureaucrats working at David's new Ministry for Regulations.
David's actually awesome ngl
Yeah right
@@chrismckellar9350 knows nothing of politics do you
@@user-jg2jo4sh5f - It seems that don't either. It you did, you wouldn't be making woke comments.
@@user-jg2jo4sh5fneither do you.
See it’s easy, I can say that too. Get off your high horse mate
This guy is beyond normal. Spent couple of hours of his time, in 6 months saved tax payers $140 Million. In the Wellington POST, children were asked about a taste test, would thy eat this again. Given around 7.5 /10. Well, he can always open a restaurant when he's sick of being an MP!
The great results he touched with his fingers. Taste test for Principles Bill argument? Might also get 7.5/10!!
Does't change the fact that the general tax payer should'nt have to be fleeced (yet again) for other peoples children.........
If you can't afford to feed your children don't have them. Extreme circumstances can be helped by family and community. But there are NO free lunches in life.
Good that Mike doesn’t address any potential nutritional gaps, the company that theyve contracted have a history of poor food quality, racking business away from locals etc.
Classic
So well stated, please keep it up!
No vegetables as fats as you could see - David and Mike wouldn’t even feed this rubbish to their dogs.
You are probably jumping the gun Mike. There have been zero meals provided yet.
And that’s exactly the number which should be provided. Feeding their children should be the number one priority for parents.
@@jasperhorace7147 curious how old you are?
@@tarrasacid1612 What’s that got to do with parents shuffling their responsibilities off onto tax payers?
@@jasperhorace7147 well there was an older generation who got state sponsored milk in schools. I would put money on you receiving it.
@@tarrasacid1612and what's that's got to do with it . Parents cant afford to feed there children don't have them . Some parents breed like rabbits then complain they can't afford to support them 😂
stop press, professional whinger says stop whingeing...
Don’t you mean truth teller? Is he Labour / Greens / TPM? Now there’s a pack of whingers!!
You tell ‘em mike
Seymour should eat those lunches for a month - he’ll provide those in the Beehive - did you see the food? Not a vegetable in sight.
Mike would not even feed this to his dog.
Kids don't eat vegetables
@@kimkay2196 that’s only because you don’t know how to cook them properly.
All my children ate vegetables.
These lunches are to feed hungry kids who otherwise could not concentrate in class. The lunch programme is not a "warm fuzzies" addition to the generous welfare grants available.
My child brings his own lunch to school then brings back the free lunches just to get thrown in the rubbish
The amount of free lunches getting thrown away 😡 if children are really hungry they would eat them not be picky.
Guess he won't be eating that every day. Reminecent of OLIVER TWIST eating well, while kids eat porridge.
Don’t forget they do have parents who should at the very least feed their kids
Exactly...didnt need lunches until Jacinda came along....now people act as if it's a right they have had for decades
A genuinely hungry person would be grateful for porridge.
They might have done a good job. Yet to be seen. I'm left wondering if it's really $3 a pop, then is someone getting screwed in the chain? I'm sure efficiencies could be had, but i'm not convinced it could be done this fast or easily.
What do we say about cheap goods from TEMU eah forced labour 😮😮😮
Compass Catering will be making a good profits on his school lunches, as Compass is known for paying low wages and providing average some what bland meals. The real test is, how much will be wasted or not eaten.
@@rogermail7060 - Compass Catering will be making a good profits on his school lunches, as Compass is known for paying low wages and providing average some what bland meals. The real test is, how much will be wasted or not eaten.
i hope they"re paying attention to the deficits. I hear that money printing machine starting up again.
Americans have the orange one
We got the red man
My God, this guy Hoskings looks like he has the biggest hangover and just fell out of bed and grabbed the nearest tee-shirt and threw a "unthoughtful" jacket. Please, treat us with a bit of respect, or just stay on the radio, where we don't have to look at you!
no I call it his dressing gown
Wow nasty leftist. He puts that lying communist on his show from the US in the morning to satisfy you lefty lunatics. Is that not enough to curb you anger!
@@helenlizzystewart4908 the truth is he is actually very vain and his clothes cost a small mortgage....the new elite simply get paid so much they dont care what you peasants think
🤡🧌