Midazolam! Why John Campbell is a DISGRACE to the nursing profession.
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 май 2024
- Medical professionals in the UK and around the world did their absolute best for their patients during the pandemic, but Covid can be a deadly disease, particularly in those who are unvaccinated.
Providing palliative care and ensuring that people can pass peacefully and not in pain and distress is something that all compassionate medical professionals support. Trying to twist this vital care into something else just to get views from antivaxxers is simply disgraceful. And yet that is what Dr John Campbell has done in his Midazolam video. Dr Susan Oliver and Cindy the dog go back to the science to show that his claims are absurd and abhorrent.
Buy me a coffee (or Cindy a treat)
www.buymeacoffee.com/SusanAnd...
We really appreciate your support
Video interview with Dr Jonathan Howard
• Contrarian doctors put...
We want them infected (from Amazon)
www.amazon.com/Want-Them-Infe...
We want them infected (from publisher)
redhawkpublications.com/We-Wa...
Links to sources:
Impact of registration delays on mortality statistics in England and Wales: 2020
www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati...
Place and Underlying Cause of Death During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Cohort Study of 3.5 Million Deaths in England and Wales, 2014 to 2020
www.mayoclinicproceedings.org...
Midazolam: an essential palliative care drug
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
Four Essential Drugs Needed for Quality Care of the Dying: A Delphi-Study Based International Expert Consensus Opinion
www.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10...
Assessing the impact of Australia’s mass vaccination campaigns over the Delta and Omicron outbreaks
journals.plos.org/plosone/art...
Anticipatory prescribing for end-of-life care
www.bma.org.uk/advice-and-sup...
Open prescribing
openprescribing.net/ 
Наука
I hope you enjoyed the video. A few people have mentioned in the comments that they'd prefer to listen to Cindy than me, so I let her present a couple of slides.
For those who don't know, Dr. OLIVER IS NOT PART OF THE CONSPIRACY. She makes these videos under duress. CINDY OLIVER, however, is deep in the rabbit hole. (It's in the breed, it's just their instinct.) CINDY is part of a large underground network of housepets who concocted covid-19 as a way to enforce lockdowns and prevent their owners from leaving them behind each day while they go to work. This may be my last post after exposing Agent CINDY. Please, send coffees and treats, it may be the only thing keeping Dr. OLIVER safe.
Cindy is more educated & rational than nurse John :P :D
@@whitewings2363
"This may be my last post "
I have a friend called Max. He has a silver hammer. He'll be along soon. |:
But what he’s losing in honesty, integrity, and ethics he makes up in terms of RUclips Traffic and $$$$.
Thanks Dr Susan, and Cindy. Campbell has become a monster for clicks and entertainment.
Dear Dr. Oliver and Cindy the Dog, thank you for your vigilance and clarity.
Great stuff again Dr Oliver
Love how you use his own old videos to debunk his new videos
Because the past is always correct. Just like how the WHO claimed that covid wasn't transmissible.
@@steinarnielsen8954 The WHO never said that.
@@nigelpigott 14.01.2020
@@steinarnielsen8954 Yes, I have read what they said on that day. They did not say that COVID wasn't transmissible.
so now you gonna make theories about how they combined different kinds of injections or body transmitting operation with a sample of covid since fall of 2019 all over the world and covered that up then spread it and no one noticed? I mean heya keep being paranoid, i guess something might come up, i dont trust the anything either the world is full of liars and honesty 😂😂
Oh no. This is truly disgusting. Bedside RN here.
I looked at the paper and noted the single author. I believe there were distinct anti-vax views presented later in the paper if I recall correctly. John's title was "mida". I wonder why he abbreviated it? John is fully in the rabbit-hole.
Most likely he did not want to to draw the attention of doctors and scientists to it when he first uploaded it, and report it as misinformation, and risk RUclips removing it and giving him a strike for misinformation. When it stayed up, he became emboldened and changed the title, to draw in more clicks.
@@calluna5030👏
If you ever feel worthless in your job, just remember - Some programmer out there was once asked to write the software for RUclips’s reporting system
Thank you Dr Susan Oliver. 👍
Incredible! Does this show that nurses don't need to major in research to any extent as part of their training/education? How can a nurse actually believe this stuff if they remotely understood any of the data...never mind how he would actually believe colleagues to be capable of this!
Nurses, like medical doctors, are practitioners not researchers. They get pretty minimal research methods training - less than, say, a first-year psychology undergraduate. Campbell _should_ have substantially improved his research knowledge and skills when working towards his doctorate, but apparently he didn't.
In the US, a doctorate in Education is obtainable with seriously low standards. I was told by my department head, "just find an old study and rerun it. Either agree or disagree with its conclusions"
@@BigBoaby-sg1yo Not if their training is primarily in practice. An MD is not a PhD.
@@BigBoaby-sg1yo Research is a polysemous word. Here we are talking about scientific research, as in primary empirical data collection and analysis. We are not talking about literature research (i.e. reading - obviously medics read things) or taking a patient history (which is not research). Learn to understand context.
@@BigBoaby-sg1yo The flu was where it always is: circulating among the general population. What point do you think you're making?
Some context for the medications described, all of which are used as required (not automatically) for symptom control in good quality palliative care:
Midazolam is used for agitation.
Antimuscarinics are used for respiratory secretions (common in people succombing to respiratory infections)
Haloperidol is an antipsychotic but for palliative care is used in low doses for anti sickness effect. Higher doses help with delerium but it isn't clear from the video what the prescribing indications were.
My best friend and wife are both GPs. Covid tore through care homes with devestating effect. One dementia care home locally lost 27/30 residents, most of whom could not be certified as covid due to a lack of covid testing, contrary to conspiracy theorist claims. It isn't surprising that GP prescribing of end of life care drugs increased. JC could ask some pallitive care doctors or GPs for their perspectives, but he won't. Clearly his wish for investigation for this correlation doesn't extend to asking anyone who provided care to patients.
Campbell doesn't need to "ask". He knows the facts. He's deliberately telling lies
In fact, he says he did speak to them.
I've always thought that hearing from Campbell's previous colleagues would be very illuminating about what kind of person and professional he is. Maybe this latest ridiculousness will encourage some to come forward.
He must have been an "interesting" work colleague.
"Let's see what prompted this latest outburst".
Cuts to John reading an article about "Excess Deaths".
Sigh...
Get out the umbrellas.
So glad you had Dr. Howard on. Think we need to remember how bad Covid was in 2020. Especially remember the over 3500 health care workers in the U.S. who died from Covid taking care of others.
Amazing how quickly we forget!
True. Not to be forgotten are the health care workers who suffer and struggle with long covid, even now. Sick leave among patient facing staff within the NHS is at record highs mostly because of long covid. They have been terribly let down by their employers that continue to deny their employees PPE and clean air at work.
This means that of every 42 healthcare workers that died that year 1 died of covid.
Sad how the CDC new of the adverse reactions to Moderna. Good to see that AstraZeneca last week acknowledged in court that its Covid vaccine can cause a rare blood clotting condition.
😂😂😂😂
Thanks for another very informative debunking, Dr Oliver and Cindy. The people and claims that Campbell is attaching himself to grow ever more shocking.
that recap of Campbell's early covid video is so mind blowing. He even puts into reference how the early data is limited (just to New York City) etc... so like he CAN be reasonable... its insane and psychologically fascinating how the increase in his youtube revenue stream has easily corrupted him within such short time. well, at least that is the only explanation I can think of... and of course having a flock of followers that adore and appeal to his ego, I guess. Wild.
He is also not very knowledgeable or bright. That definitely did not help.
Campbell started out doing mostly-correct but simplistic overviews, having slightly more knowledge than the average person. By the time Ivermectin became a talking point, he was at best absolutely out of his depth and commenting on papers that he clearly didn't have the research knowledge and skills to understand. He bought into Ivermectin, despite the evidence _even in the papers he was citing_ showing clearly that it does nothing to help prevent or treat Covid, and spiraled downwards from there into complete anti-science crankery.
Although he said this data only applies to NYC, as you say, he immediately extrapolated the data to everywhere. He was always a little bit shit even when he had good intent.
Greed plus ego, a bad combination.
Which is exactly what you're doing here.
My mum had a midazolam injection before she died , but she was very stressed and in pain and this was given by a hospice to make her last hours better. She was told she was going to die of heart failure 6 months before she passed and she was 94 . The last couple of days she was crying out and didn’t recognise my brother and I , the hospice administered midazolam and morphine and she went of into a deep sleep and passed away . She did not have Covid but had been vaccinated against it . Midazolam is used at and end of life sedation it helps the dying and helps the families seeing thier loved one in less distress.
If its a "let them die in peace" medicine, why was it used against covid?
Yes it is as you say and the issue is that it is used to prematurely end life too and/or to cover up plausibly-deniable medical malpractice.
You are all making rationalizations for what was once called "euthanasia" and is now "end of life care". Think about what you ae all doing.
@@marisamartin3664 lol . Before posting check and learn at least a few things about the topic so you don’t look so completely silly . It’s obvious you do t even have the first clue about the issue . No wonder you make an easy target for the con man Campbell
The minds of certain ppl as to what happened during the COVID-19 pandemic were deleted. No way can anyone, especially a(n) (ex) nurse, just not realize how bad it was... Plus, if needed any more evidence of his quackery, just compare him now to his old videos, when he didn´t spew BS (Thank you Dr. Susan, for reminding us of a golden era John)...
Susan, you missed something.
On the title page of the paper (time 4:30), it's stated that the article was submitted on Jan 20 and accepted on Jan 25. Obviously peer review was not done. Many other papers in this journal are similar, with 5 to 10 days between submission and acceptance.
I have contacted the journal, asking them how they can claim to be peer reviewed when many -- and perhaps all -- of the papers are not peer reviewed. So far, no response.
"Obviously peer review was not done"
Well, theoretically it can be done in such a short time frame - there are some journals that can do this with some papers, especially if they know the paper is coming (peer reviewers in place), it is considered enormously important, and the authors are very competent. See the first paper on PCR of SARS-CoV2 by Corman et al.
"So far, no response."
How surprising! /sarc
@@Marco-it2mr
A typical round of peer review usually includes the following steps:
1. Editor reads manuscript to see if it's suitable to proceed.
2. Editor finds peer reviewers.
3. Peer reviewers perform and return their evaluations.
4. Editor reads reviews and makes recommendation of what to do with the paper.
5: A decision of what to do next is made, often by a more senior editor.
6. If revision is needed, authors edit and return revised manuscript plus point-by-point responses to reviews.
Typically two or three rounds of review are needed.
This means the whole process typically takes a few months. Five days is nearly impossible. That most of the papers (from the few monthly issues I examined) were accepted within 10 days of submission tells me that peer review wasn't being done, as no journal can review that many papers that fast. Not possible.
@@stewarttrickett3033 As someone with plenty of papers, I know it usually takes months. A short turn-over for one paper is, however, not a red flag as such. The short tunr-over for ALL the papers in this journal is, of course, a red flag.
@@stewarttrickett3033 The journal is published by a company run by 6 employees and is owned by a Chiropractor.
@@Marco-it2mr
A quick perusal of their articles show that at least half of the papers were accepted within 10 days of submission. That's not a red flag, that's an air raid siren.
Always appreciated
The only question remaining for me is why isn’t this man called before the medical council and brought to task for his regular misinterpretation of data and dangerous influence over the anti vax gullible. Such influence may well cost lives in future but he has the audacity to accuse serving nurses of illegal euthanasia too.
How far over the line does he need to venture before he is stripped of his doctorate, his confirmation of credibility.
In my own profession such rogue misrepresentations would not be tolerated without official sanction.
Brilliantly and so clearly dissected Susan. So interesting as a lead anti vaxer he presents graphs which destroy his own arguments and instead show just how effective multi vaccinations have been in saving lives, something which logical sensible people have realised for a long time now.
But not apparently if you make money by representing a minority rogue view contrary to the vast majority of true medical doctors and practitioners who had to live through the awfulness of it at its worst.
"the medical council "- unfortunaely, they have nothing to say about a nurse. And the nursing council doesn't seem to be too interested to do anything, because he's not an active nurse.
"How far over the line does he need to venture before he is stripped of his doctorate, his confirmation of credibility."
This discussion is actually quite old: there are no clear professional rules regarding revoking PhD degrees, because a PhD degree is not a profession. You can have a MD degree, but not be allowed to practice medicine, because you do not have a license. If you cannot get a license due to various forms of misconduct or malpractice, you still retain your MD.
Because it's not misinterpretation. If you're wondering about the efficacy of vaccines just look to Israel. They didn't emerge from the pandemic any sooner than the rest of the world.
@@steinarnielsen8954 Israel is a poor example, at the national level. There are some groups where almost 100% of those eligible are vaccinated and other groups where almost none are vaccinated; mainly because of ethnic and religious reasons. Those vaccinated fared much better than the unvaccinated, but the latter kept the virus circulating, until the immunity acquired from infection accumulated sufficiently to reduce the time relative R number to below 1.
@@Marco-it2mr He “pretends” to be an authority, implies he is a medical doctor though, surly he must be bound by some medical authority control. It’s not my area, so what is it? Surely a body confirming a doctorate should have the ability to strip it too if that individual is operating contrary to their standards, retired or not. Because it’s that qualification he obviously relies on heavily to validate his constantly discredited opinions.
There must be some control from his professional body in the public interest and failing that control of the media he exploits to spread his misinformation.
No one can be above the law, this isn’t simply about freedom of speech he is alleging NHS staff murdered people now. He is dangerously out of control with his wrongful influence.
If he cannot be stopped from doing this our laws need to be revised. Why aren’t the medical profession outing him officially. It should not be left to the good offices of the likes Susan here to do the graft of unravelling his falsehoods and debunking the lies and behalf of sensible public awareness. The system clearly lacks adequate control.
@@steinarnielsen8954 Oh look, dumbarse didn't bring any evidence.
Thanks!
Another good video! Can't thank you enough for the honest work you are doing. You're a good person! So is Cindy... well good dog...
Cindy thought Midazolem was a Harry Potter reference for a moment there...
John has completely lost it! Thank you Susan, and Cindy, for your videos.
And Cindy ? You have lost the Plot somewhat !
He's obviously losing ballast in the form of integrity, ethics, and honesty.
Losing.....?? What he lost in morals he made up for it in monetary terms.
Thanks for the videos!
I think the BBC will have to do another podcast...and maybe this time actually send a reporter to Campbell's home and start asking questions.
That sounds a bit too much like actual reporting for the current news gathering processes in the BBC.
They have more interest in maintaining their virtual newsroom than journalism these days. Look at their website.
I wonder if the BBC or Susan will give us honest coverage of the
' Maddie De Garay ' true story..?
Guaranteed they will not..!
Still pushing that misinformation, eh?
What podcast is this on Jon Campbell, sounds interesting!
@@Grim_Beard
Please elaborate to why it is misinformation.?
I suspect and hope that most Health Professionals will simply ignore the misinformation put out by the likes of Campbell.
However, might some resist the use of helpful drugs in end of life care to avoid suspicion of malfeasance? Might some well meaning but wrong headed individuals prevent the appropriate drugs being given to relatives?
The possible effects of Campbell's videos are horrific.
.
But thanks to Dr Oliver for a well produced and clear video. 👌
Thanks for another great video exposing Campbell for the liar he is.
It would be interesting to hear what John's former work colleagues think of his RUclips videos now.
He does get some pretty impressive speakers if one listens !
Also they don't seem to be co-opted as most are genuinely concerned at the data that keeps coming out now
@@benhudson4014 can you name some of these "impressive speakers" that are respected among their peers?
In Carlisle there has been a sudden increase in the sale of, pitchforks, tar and feathers.
@benhudson4014 Oh really? Like Mr O Looney the clot conman who believes non human entities ate in charge? Or Mr Dalgleish who is selling his own vaccine?
We are not impressed.
Thanks Dr. Oliver, you’re the best.🌺
Always a good day when I see a new upload! Thanks again for your endeavours.
03:15 (top right) Waitaminute.... a Medical journal with a... gmail contact address for the editor?
Dammit Dr. Oliver, you beat me to it a few seconds later :D
Goodness this caused a large an uproar even in the antivax community. There are now antivaxxers on twitter that are angry and calling Campbell out, almost like a Antivax civil war.
You did a great job explaining the science and data, even pointing out where John is wrong or lying.
Wow, thanks for that surprising news that the CarLiar is being called out by some of his target audience.
@@lindaward truthers are a fickle bunch, they probably think he is poaching on other people’s territory. Grifting off it even🤔
He's the Titus Oates of the 21rst century. Thank you as always for your great work
The journal impact. When I was an undergraduate my 3rd year research project was published in a 2.5 impact journal.
When I visited the website up popped a chat bot asking for paper submissions.
The gmail address, and the 'level' of the website, not a good signs. I wonder where all the 'publication fees' are going, doesn't seem that the website or a server.
Also out of interest I clicked on one of the recent publications 10.33140/MCR.09.03.02 a 'power point article'! Well the number of PowerPoints for lectures etc I have made I'm pretty sure with enough 'investment' I could get my 'publication record' into the 1000s and a Professorship (in the UK we call them Chairs) is then an absolute certainty, well until someone actually checks out the journal!
Brownstone set up?
@@DC-wt2vi for this paper? Perhaps so. For the paper I submitted as an undergrad, the journal was(is) 'Parasitology'. Impact factor at the time 2.5. Just reviewed and its 10-year metric has gone up, to 2.8! :)
To put my contribution to the paper in full perspective, I generated most of the data, performed a lot of the analysis. The final review of course was by my supervisor who had far more expertise in setting the research into appropriate context and fuller analysis of its impact in the research field.
The 'Parasitology' journal is very respected journal. The impact factor likely reflects the 'interest' in the field of parasitology :(
Every day John just sinks lower and lower.
He is growing fat of money. His weight class is super heavyweight now.
No wonder he is sinking in.
If John sinks any lower he will tunnel through the earth and pop up in Australia.
They have quite enough deadly snakes there already.
Actually, he would end up in Otago, New Zealand.
He would have to sink down from the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean to pop up in Australia. Of course, he would succumb to pressure effects long before reaching the bottom of the ocean, so I think we're safe.
@@williamverhoef4349 He might meet his boss on the way.
He was actually in Australia a couple of weeks ago. That explains how he got there.
Who says we want him Down Under?
lol! The sheep in his background! Pmsl 😂
Campbell's relatives, Baaasil and Baaarbara .
Thanks for pointing that out 🐑🐑
They didn't need drugs to kill patients, they just took them off ventilators(like my 75 year old brother in law in May 2020, who took 18 hours of suffering to die)
I'm glad he's not a nurse any more.
Unfortunately he is still on U.K. register as a nurse
And Oliver isn't a medical doctor.
@@kend3404good thing Oliver never claims to be an MD then.
@@alastairleith8612 He does claim to be accurate, which is bollocks, as Australians and Brits put it.
@@alastairleith8612 I saw him introduced on DW German TV as a "physician".
He had the opportunity to correct the error but didn't.
In my book that's as bad as "claiming to be an MD"
Unbelievable
Thank you for the analysis and clarity of logic. Even Cindy can be seen rolling her eyes as you demonstrated that correlation is not causation, despite Campbell's assertions. Gotta love the toilet paper sales connection to covid mortality. Enjoyed that abbreviated interview with Dr. Howard. I continue to wonder why the misrepresentations of data persists. Thanks again for your energy and willingness to stick to the science and the data.
this guy is so so hungry for more RUclips millions, he can't help himself make up such ridiculous bs. Anyone with any actual science background, could see his error within seconds of his bs assertion
Its one thing to be a grifter, but John is a grifter with an intent to deceive. Completely despicable.
Worse, his deception is undermining trust in vaccines. Countless people might die because of his deception for no good reason.
Step away from the keyboard and give your nerves a rest.
@@kend3404 well then do you think Campbells victims deserve a grifter like him because they are too easy to fool? Do you think there inability to think for themselves is the main reason they are antivaxers? The same reason Campbell can victimize them every time ?
@@kend3404
O will not enter into an argument with anyone but my husband (who was a very healthy man) died from the protocol (Medasolam) & so we're many others. In Africa Medasolam was administered to patients who contracted Ebola but they died from the medication. Fauci knew Medasolam was a killer, Why did he allow it to be given to Covid patients & why was it not removed from market? It is the NIH protocol for patients presenting to hospital with Covid symptoms. Sorry, but John is spot-on! There is much the rule markers have to account for. The drs. who gave this protocol to patients knew people were being killed by it yet continued to administer it, why ... for the money they were paid to commit murder!!!
What would Buzzin' Blowfly know of Plato?
What would Buzzin' Blowfly know of the truth.
When a safe and effective vaccine was developed,
He passed it up for horse-paste with Vermouth.
I really lost my mind when i saw the midazolam video. I am a former nurse and I know that midazolam is NOT used in the way he infers. He would fully know this as well as an ex nurse. He also neglects to mention that the NICE guidelines he quotes in the video are for PALLIATIVE care only. Anyone who has had dental sedation, sedation for an endoscopy, or a general anaesthetic will have had midazolam. We all survived (unless there was a medial reason unrelated to midazolam). This was the video when I knew he'd well and truly lost it (his original video on this was posted quite some time ago). Just anecdotally, I had midazolam with the G.A when I had an operation on my sinuses. I woke up smiling my head off due to the midazolam, and most definitely not dead.
As a nurse, I concur.
Thank you for sharing your professional experience.
Campbell is a disgrace
@@fintonmainz7845 He absolutely IS a disgrace and brings the nursing profession into disrepute. I hope he is no longer on the NMC register, as he absolutely shouldn't be
Midazolam and morphine syringe driver combo is standard NHS Liverpool pathway method, palliative and where the angels of death decide the patient is become a useless eater.
@@twoleftfeet9626and that disrepute is deserved unless and until the whole medical “profession” addresses its own orchard of rotten apples
Thanks Susan for answering this abhorrent misinformation by John Campbell!
1:36 I remember the training well, the most frightening part was the mass hypnosis session that turned us into murderous beasties.
Is that you Dr Shipman?
@@Costa_Conn I forgot the sarc.
I am amazed at how many people believe the entire medical profession is one huge conspiracy to deny people simple cures so they can make more money.
😂😂😂
This was a particularly grim one. You're doing the work John should have done.
Haha, a gmail address is the classic red flag of many email-based scams. Pure coincidence, I'm sure.
he is a sad example of the power of money!!!
An antvaxxer was ignorant Simeon.
He only read what he could see in obsideon.
He had nothing to say
But said it anyway.
His thoughts are bound for sure oblivion.
@@BigBoaby-sg1yo
Did you forget you are on, "Back to the Science"?
The jump between the correlative nature of Midazolam/excess deaths and there being some policy of euthanasia was so large that it won a dunk contest.
It’s vaguely familiar 🤔. Seems an old conspiracy theory is re-circulating. Like a virus!
Thanks
Thank you. I really appreciate your support.
Hi Dr Susan (and Cindy)
Thank you for your videos
How can we prepare a petition or request to enquire about a misinformation fine?
I love it when you make the old John Campbell prove that the new John Campbell is lying and fooling those who love him due to his greed.
Maybe someone (not me!) could make a whole video of old vs new Campbell. Susan already has quite a few examples, but there surely must be more.
@@Marco-it2mr love the idea
Because the past is always correct. Just like how the WHO said covid 19 wasn't transmissible.
@@steinarnielsen8954 the WHO did not say COVID19 was not transmissable - why lie SO ENORMOUSLY OBVIOUSLY, Steinar?
We can all check what they really wrote:
"Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel #coronavirus (2019-nCoV) identified in #Wuhan, #China"
This isn't even subtly different. Moreover, it is also not even subtly different from Campbell lecturing in the past about long-known things, while acting today as if it is all new to him and obviously a problem.
@@steinarnielsen8954 it’s a little more than that but when could antivaxer think or pay attention to detail ?
14:33 if someone actually looked at the old Liverpool Care Pathway they would see that this has happened for many years, John Campbell would be aware of this as well. There’s no point in waiting for a doctor, whether in hospital or in the community, to prescribe such medication when it’s actually needed as that would be too late to relieve suffering. It happens in other circumstances as well, for instance a person who has a compromised immune system and is likely to develop pneumonia regularly will have an anticipatory prescription for antibiotics at hand such that they can get the medication before it becomes critical.
You are right this is probably the lowest Campbell has ever stooped to. So there is a correlation between people given end of life palliative care and death. WTF would you expect.
My 103 year old grandmother suffered from pulmonary oedema as a result of heart failure, this means her lungs were filling up with liquid and she struggled desperately for breath. I was the last of her near family still alive and sat with her all day and sometimes all night for 10 days as she panicked when I was leaving Although she was 103 she had all her faculties and had a good idea that she was dying. Imagine the terror of struggling for breath and knowing you were likely to die. Quite similar to covid I imagine.
Towards the end she was given morphine and slipped away peacefully.
I cannot express the disgust I feel for Campbell without risking having this comment deleted by RUclips
Wasn't Sweden also criticized for providing palliative care? Interestingly their excess death rate is lower than in the rest of Scandinavia.
@@steinarnielsen8954 Another lie from Steinhole. Sweden's excess death rate was FAR FAR FAR higher initially, than any other country in the region.
@@steinarnielsen8954 Just to be clear I was in no way criticising the palliative care my grandmother received. I can't comment .on palliative care in Sweden.
Sweden has been lauded as a example of how things should have been done by right wing economists as lock downs and anything which interfere with them making money is abhorrent. Sweden and Norway ended up having around the same level of excess deaths but the death rate was much higher in the early years of the pandemic in Sweden due to . lax social distancing rules." If the relative distribution of excess mortality in Sweden had been the same as in Norway in 2020-2022, approximately 7000 individuals who died in 2020 would instead have died as excess mortality in 2022, saving approximately 14,000 person-years in Sweden."(Lindstrom Scan J Of Public Health, !8 Mar 2024) It is a well known phenomenon called mortality displacement.
@@neilthompson8668 Sweden actually has fewer excess deaths.
@@steinarnielsen8954 Did you read the paper?
What the holy hell? He’s totally lost it. When I saw the title -I said oh man-what now? This is just nuts.
comment for the algorithm
Campbell would be called a quack if he was really an MD.
So what would you call sexy Suzy if she was really a doctor, Ducky?
Mucky Duck Quack Quack
@@janicewatts5888 She has a doctorate and has never claimed to be a medical doctor or allowed comments to be made. But why not address the issue at hand. Campbell is a total imbecile promoting utter shit. Susan is an intelligent scientist explaining reality.
@@janicewatts5888she would be called a medical doctor, or in her case MD, PhD considering she has a PhD in a relevant subject area. Perhaps you’re ignorant of Nurse Campbell’s credentials. He is a nurse, not a medical doctor. He has a PhD in Nursing Education not in a scientific field. So he’s not qualified to interpret scientific or clinical studies as can be seen by all the stupid “mistakes” he makes (unless of course he is deliberately trying to mislead the scientifically illiterate).
No she wouldn't be so wrong
Secondly, i am fully aware of campbells qualifications. So wrong again
"Campbell is the best!" said Whining Prince
Who in ad-speak is clearly well versed,
But there's nothing that Campbell is best at
Except he's best at being the worst.
thanks for another good one
Talking about correlations, there was a correlation between one-star reviews for scented candles on Amazon and covid outbreaks, caused by people loosing their sense of smell, lol.
Thanks again so much Susan for keeping on this guy.
Kathy Cornfield is having another caffeine crisis.
Guzzling coffee, Kathy's on the side of the virus.
hee hee. I like it - short, snappy and funny. I'm out of here before Maria arrives and starts giving me a hard time. Good to see your poems back! See you next time.
He is getting increasingly nutty.
Sad to see.
He's making big money by pandering to the nutty.
😂😂😂😂
Even the journals website looks like it was made in MS Paint and has a gmail email account. Completely amatuer.
We have a huge issue across the world with people, who don't know much but have huge confidence and a lack of people who do have the knowledge, being in the same room at the same time and confident enough to challenge the guy at the front talking BS.
We need more people like you, Dr Oliver. Please keep going!!
Always a reliable source for demonstrable debunking of social media grifters and ignoramuses. Keep 'em coming.
Your hard work to accurately set the story straight and hold disgraceful profiteers like Campbell to account is really appreciated by so many of us. Thanks again Dr Oliver for the interesting and important video!
Publishing this paper destroys any possible credibility that journal might have had. This is how a journal tells you what it really is, which in this case it's a business, focused only on making money. Might as well have published in Cureus or Medical Hypothesis.
The horrible thing about Cureus is that it IS on the Master journal list of Clarivate. Medical Hypothesis is Elsevier.
@@Marco-it2mr Yep, Elsevier has a lot to answer for. Clarivate is a business first, not a scientific organization.
@@jaykanta4326 Clarivate is, however, THE benchmark for getting an impact factor.
@@Marco-it2mr Yeah, I think that's got to change. Impact factors are becoming meaningless when so many known predatory journals have IF's above 2. They're gaming the system
@@jaykanta4326 The IF of this particular journal is just a made-up number that is unrelated to how Clarivate determines impact factors.
When I first heard you say that you’d thought that Campbell could not sink any lower, I thought “Susan might be having cognitive issues; it would be *impossible* to sink any lower”
15 seconds later I ate my words. Holy crap!
I remain impressed by your cognition, and am thankful for your good work. 🙏
Dr Crapbell strikes again, accusing medical colleagues of euthanasia. Would be better if he talked about something else, and stopped trying to maintain his cash flow with lies. Thanks once again Dr Oliver. Perhaps we could have Dr C's views on youthinasia, bet he is an expert on that too.
_"Would be better if he talked about something else"_
Whenever he does this, the number of views drops dramatically. He and his followers simply can't have that. His video about hiking the Darwin Trail from three weeks ago had around 71,000 views.
To make up for this low, he has to talk about even worse anti-vaxxer nonsense.
Dr Campbell has in fact talked about euthanasia. He even did it during the 1st wave of the pandemic.
@@steinarnielsen8954
I hope you know how much you are appreciated for all your hard work.
Very much undervalued she is.
The "Scientific community" should do more on an organized basis to counter pseudoscience.
For sure the comedy value is priceless :)
Here just for Buzznarrownind is a quote from Plato on ignorance
“A man may truly say that ignorance is a third case of crimes. Ignorance, however, may be conveniently divided… into two sorts: There is simple ignorance, which is the source of lighter offenses, and double ignorance, which is accompanied by a conceit of wisdom; and he who is under the influence of the latter fancies that he knows all about matters of which he knows nothing. This second kind of ignorance, when possessed of power and strength, will be… the source of great and monstrous crimes…”
Can I have a ❤ please Susan?
A healthy society should strive to help all its members reach their full potential and contribute meaningfully, not relegate some to a permanent underclass. Providing quality education, mental health support, and economic opportunities benefits everyone by expanding the pool of capable, productive citizens. However, I get this feeling that in some countries, there is a definite imbalance that's then exported via social media on a global scale.
I'm disappointed that nursing bodies are so tardy in criticizing Retired Nurse Campbell.
He brings the whole nursing profession into disrepute.
I'm also disappointed but the nursing profession is well regarded. If anything their standing in the community rose with the pandemic and they deserve our support in the face of antivax attacks and government cuts.
@@peterbrockway5990 I was in hospital recently and was treated with the utmost kindness, humanity and professionalism by all the nursing staff.
I fully agree with your comments regarding nurses "during the pandemic".
Yes, it's high time, the professional organisations took a stand against charlatans like Campbell.
Thank you so much to all the nurses who actually worked through the pandemic. You are heroes.
@@BigBoaby-sg1yo what were you doing during the pandemic? Were you 👍 your own comments back then too?
@@BigBoaby-sg1yo still not capable of rationally discussing any of the specific content here are you. Instead spending your time defending the defenceless. I get why some nurses felt the need to let off steam during the worst of it. Could you cope with what they had to? I very much doubt you could.
@@BigBoaby-sg1yo not old enough to have developed wisdom! But not too old you can’t use the internet obviously.
@@BigBoaby-sg1yo so basically, you were completely unaffected beyond slightly inconvenienced? That makes sense.
@@BigBoaby-sg1yo and, somehow, you still think your opinion on hospital staff carries literally any weight what so ever? Wonder why that is? A real mystery. 🤭
I'm amazed that RUclips still monetizes Dr Campbells channel. Disgraceful
Felix has Moobs !
@@amnoahwielwabbit3837Buzz has a 🐰🧠 !
Hard to swallow that you can't "prove" him wrong?
@@steinarnielsen8954 have you even watched Dr Susans videos? Everything Dr Campbell does is cherry pick data and misinterpret papers to support his antivax agenda
Thought excess death arc was over, but I was wrong
He should be stripped of his PhD as he's using it to act as an authority in medicine and science
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Thanks Dr Oliver. Great work again showing Campbell for the grifter he is. ❤
And I thought he had reached his all-time low a few times already.
We should stop wondering how low are people able to sink. Johnny boy here is taking it as a challenge.
unbelievable the dangerous rubbish he churns out. Thank you so much for another informative video
Three People who I have followed during the pandemic have reached the top 100 influencers in health (Time 100 Health):
- Katelyn Jetelina.
- Peter Hotez.
- Eric Topol.
Thanks.
I'm a little jaded by such lists, although they do have value if they introduce Time's readers to people they should take note of.
In particular the political slant of the magazine is reflected in the easy combination of politicians and rich donors with scientists and others who work selflessly. Unless I am missing someone they pick and choose what counts as health, ignoring the ongoing climate emergency, gun violence, homelessness, etc. Pursuing a challenge to the view "that people are wired to focus on when things go wrong and when they don’t work" they omit the thing which stands out as having gone wrong: the spread of medical misinformation. Indeed it is Time's own watchwords of "Trust" and "impact" that have assumed the malignant forms of "Grift" and "Clout".
Anyone still following Campbell has some major issues in their life.
Susan definitely does. That's why she's fixated on him. She never tries to "debunk" anyone else.
@@steinarnielsen8954 she was once a guest on his show when he wasn’t a conspiracy theorist so she has skin in the game my friend.
@@steinarnielsen8954 and she does debunk others as it happens but non provide such ammunition as Scampbell.
@@markhammerschmidt5315 Campbell was a "conspiracy" theorist in January 2020 because he disagreed with the WHO.
@@steinarnielsen8954 still not about to discuss the content given here though eh? Just immediately dismissed yet Scampbell is unquestioningly believed, and you call us Sheep!! Oh the irony!
Nurse Campbell needs the authorities to step in. Great video, thanks again for your fantastic work.
Why? Censorship being a solution? How about refuting his ideas with better ones? Allow adults to draw their own conclusions from the best available information and ideas. Are the authorities to be trusted? Who determines the "acceptable" information? What we are allowed to think?
@@carleddison7479 Disseminating misinformation that cause real-world damage, deserves a real-world intervention.
I just bought the book on Audible.
❤ for the algorithm .
John showing us what a big L looks like
As a nurse involved in caring for end of life care ”Dr” nurse Campbell's accusations are completely egregious. There is very strict criteria and guidelines for prescribing and administring anticipatory medications not to mention legislation and ethics involved.
Nurse Campbell obviously has no personal professional experience of this aspect of care. He is speaking outside of his sphere of competence yet again.
Has the NMC struck him off the register yet??!!
He’s still on the register, I don’t think his Adult Nurse registration lapses until April next year, he’s obviously paid his registration fee for this year. His mental health nurse registration lapsed July last year.
It’s just nasty.
@@patnevison7361 totally agree, goes against everything that he should be standing for. I would go as far as to suggest it may put him in the company of Beverley Allitt, Harold Shipman and Lucy Letby
@@MRCAGR1 Who are you? The Attorney General of Truth?
Thanks again for an informative video. I know Jordan Peterson was banished from his profession in Canada for spreading lies and misinformation. Perhaps John is due the same in his country.
Not actually true. I support this channel and I also disapprove of many of Jordan Peterson's right-wing views. However, the attempt to censor Mr. Peterson was motivated by disapproval of his political views, not because he was "spreading lies and misinformation" related to his profession. Professional regulatory bodies should steer clear of political censorship.
@@jimroth7927 I think the reasoning behind censoring Peterson, was that he was bringing his profession into disrepute.
@@christopherrobinson7541 They are trying to force him to adopt fashionable opinions. I still believe in freedom of thought and freedom of speech, even for people like Mr. Peterson, whom I disagree with. I guess I am out of fashion.
UK viewer here. If doctors and nurses are bumping people off here, they seem really rubbish at it. I'm not seeing people curling up their toes any more frequently than they used to.
You're correct of course but there is widespread (wrong) belief in the general population that there has been a massive increase in deaths.
Big ups to Dr. Howard and all at Science Based Medicine (and of course you and of course Cindy)
This time I think I have it correct LOL, thanks a lot Dr Oliver.
Thank you again. I really appreciate your extra support.
What is a "Covid injection" supposed to be? The whole thing is scientifically illiterate.
"Covid injection" was the term used in the article, obviously the author meant the vaccinations against COVID-19.
@@christopherrobinson7541 My point exactly.
@@blzebub2 I think that the author was trying to avoid using the word "vaccine".
Its what anti-vaxxers call a vaccine. This because they have no idea that covid is not in the vaccine, *at all*
What do you expect from an investment analyst.
Great video Dr. Oliver! Dr. Scambell sure is a disgrace!
I simply don't know how Campbell can be stopped. A while ago, I tried reporting him to the UK's Royal College of Nursing, but despite an acknowledgement, have heard nothing more. I guess that because he's retired, he no longer has to abide by their rules?
RUclips and Facebook make too much money to care. They may say they are doing all they can to combat misinformation but that is complete bollocks.
Thanks for reporting the disgusting liar.
Reporting someone won't lead to anything if they haven't done anything wrong. Good luck on that.
Who are you? The Grand Inquisitor?
@@steinarnielsen8954 so on your planet lying to people who love you and harming them via misinformation just for money is not wrong ? Where were you raised ?