Half of it's true, but for their case the pilot doesn't need to do anything to control it, so technically the driver did not used it.. and that was the grey area what also closed now, so even if the driver not use it, it's still banned (alias not just the on use cases but even the the passivly working cases are banned now)
Maybe brake failure in Australia was because of that tee splitter and teams or FIA was curios about reason. If that failure didn't happen then RB could use this system even longer.
you still remember the moment when Red Bull just out of nowhere accused McLaren of cheating with installing some sensor or something in the brake drums ? it might be a stretch but for me personally i think red bull was trying to get the heat of themselves
And also why he was complaining about the turning in Hungary 😂 "Im minus 5 brake bias and this thing wont turn on me!" "Max they took away the left to right brake bias"
3 words come to mind... clickbait, rumors and sensational. There is NO proof that they had this system and if they did it was not illegal. And FIA have stated that no team was using this... but yet some YT'ers know better 😕
One thing i have to correct. Its not fascinating that cars are not the same speed when someone invented something in a grey area. Its racing and we want to see which driver is the best, and not which car
I love how f1 is a game of exploiting the rules. But I also hate the fact a team only dominated because of funding and cheating. Hardly ever is a team just BETTER. It’s always dominated by a team until they get caught cheating or having a massive advantage. When it comes to this shit again I love it, but also want it to be a spec class so it’s driver/team based not cheating the rules and other teams
I was subscribed to your previous channel and learnt a lot about riding bikes on track , yesterday I had a track day and for the first time I kind of crashed , I had a rider in front of me who slowed down a lot in a corner and I had no way out than into the gravel , i could not held the bike up straight in the gravel so I fell , no harm just a few scratches on the bike but can you tell me wat to do wen you have to leave track into the gravel ? Thnx
@@user-ep3xb8js7o steering wheel had 1 button for radio, no traction, no abs, no steering power… It was like a big Gokart with high hp…:) Not only F1… When TOO much technology comes in… its ain’t the same… its not puro like they say:)
@@Laurent312 Steering wheel with many buttons has been used since 1990s. Traction control 1990-1994, 2001-2008. ABS 1970s-1994. Steering power since 1990s. I'm confused about what period you are talking. Gokart with high hp maybe was before 1970s (no aerodynamics, no big downforce). Modern f1 car doesn't use any technology to help driver except anti-stall system and steering power (F3, indycar don't have it for example). And F1 is first of all competition among cars and teams. You have F2 and F3 for drivers.
I think there is pendulum like arm in the tee that slides a sleeve left or right opening a hole to bleed off pressure to a reservoir similar to one on a shock. Just 2mm travel either way would work.😊
In a strictly engineering sense I think it’s a gray area whether that tee is a passive component. It’s a thin argument, but one could argue that it is harvesting energy from the chassis and is thus only semi-passive.
Lets be honest, that's one of those mechanically simple things that are so genius in their application that you can't help but nod your head and go... "Yeah, well done"
What is bad about innovation? Say that the FIA had banned carbon fiber and ground effect, because only one team was using them. One-design formulas are fundamentally boring. The design can't evolve because there is no competition. Yes Alberto we know that you drive in two different one-design formulas intended to make racing accessible not only to the super-rich but also to the average rich. The development war makes Formula 1 more exciting.
14 дней назад+1
This concept pioneered by McLaren 4/12 in 1997 and banned Newey created a trick to violate a current rule. I believe RB started using this device on the RB16B that was driven by Max in 2021. This is why Max was so dominant over the past two seasons and explains why Perez can't keep up with Max because it wasn't on his car.
Basically there's no incentive to not cheat...all teams should cheat until found out...results will stand...FIA doesn't have the intelligence to monitor every function on the cars....
is now 1000 days since the 8th championship was stolen away from Sir Lewis Hamilton and was given to red bull. golden boy and the weapon of FIA against sis Lewis Hamilton, who can't drive formula 1 car without asymmetric braking system. BBC And Skysports as Red Bull , max Verstappen promoters
RB's innovation, a g-sensor brake axel bias adjuster is simple and practical and has benefits for road cars. Should these innovations be embraced in F1 or do they take away from the driver? I does give an advantage without question.
@@TonyUnderscore Asymmetric braking is not an innovation, it is a very old technology that can greatly improve performance. But it is a fact, it is cheating. And the regulations do not allow such cheating. Red Bull cannot pass any form of technical review. Every race their car participated in was won by cheating. Normally, they should be disqualified from the season and even disqualified from previous races. But because Red Bull has been protected by the FIA for a long time. The FIA will not do this. The FIA will only add a regulation saying that you can't do this in the future. There is a kind of interest connection here. Just like, if the FIA loses Red Bull, it will lose its biggest sponsor, so they can't do that. Ironically, the FIA's knife is stabbing Mercedes, just like Mercedes didn't give the FIA enough money.
Just like DAS, but FIA let Mercedes to use till end of the season, if you think red bull is only one using legal / illegal part , they also talking about more teams using this trick
Sorry but they were cheating. Before this recent "clarification ", it was still illegal to use any type or kind of asymmetrical braking systems.
Half of it's true, but for their case the pilot doesn't need to do anything to control it, so technically the driver did not used it.. and that was the grey area what also closed now, so even if the driver not use it, it's still banned (alias not just the on use cases but even the the passivly working cases are banned now)
Maybe brake failure in Australia was because of that tee splitter and teams or FIA was curios about reason. If that failure didn't happen then RB could use this system even longer.
you still remember the moment when Red Bull just out of nowhere accused McLaren of cheating with installing some sensor or something in the brake drums ? it might be a stretch but for me personally i think red bull was trying to get the heat of themselves
Thats why Mad Max was always out qualifying the others or 20 sec lead. He was leaving all behind him already from the first turn.
And also why he was complaining about the turning in Hungary 😂 "Im minus 5 brake bias and this thing wont turn on me!" "Max they took away the left to right brake bias"
This videos deserve more support they are way too good, formula 4 videos are my favourite ones.
3 words come to mind... clickbait, rumors and sensational. There is NO proof that they had this system and if they did it was not illegal. And FIA have stated that no team was using this... but yet some YT'ers know better 😕
One thing i have to correct. Its not fascinating that cars are not the same speed when someone invented something in a grey area. Its racing and we want to see which driver is the best, and not which car
Not true click bait.
Why would RB stop using this alleged passive asymmetric barking system before Miami if the FIA updated reg came into effect beginning with Zandvoort?
And now RB accusing other team of cheating..RB were cheating since Max's first title.
There really is no debating of Red Bull was cheating or not… they clearly were!
So basically the "Trick" that red bull use is now banned. Am I correct?
Yeah
No, we don't know that they were using it. They *might* have been, the FIA explicitly said they were not, make of that what you want
It shows how much talent max really has
To many changes in F1, for this the teams are not close😢😢.
F1 must be the top of motorsports with minimum of restrictions but with a butget
This guy needs 100k subs
in his italian channel he has over 1 million subs
Ha un canale italiano da 1 millione di iscritti
His Italian channel has over 1 million subs
Cos he posts SLANDER?? Lies? No! He should get sued!!
i dont want to say much but its prob fake cuz where is perez ???
I love how f1 is a game of exploiting the rules. But I also hate the fact a team only dominated because of funding and cheating. Hardly ever is a team just BETTER. It’s always dominated by a team until they get caught cheating or having a massive advantage.
When it comes to this shit again I love it, but also want it to be a spec class so it’s driver/team based not cheating the rules and other teams
I was subscribed to your previous channel and learnt a lot about riding bikes on track , yesterday I had a track day and for the first time I kind of crashed , I had a rider in front of me who slowed down a lot in a corner and I had no way out than into the gravel , i could not held the bike up straight in the gravel so I fell , no harm just a few scratches on the bike but can you tell me wat to do wen you have to leave track into the gravel ? Thnx
Bring back simple race cars man…. They were all gokarters before:)
That's already a thing, but it's not F1.
no
When it was? F1 never had simple race cars.
@@user-ep3xb8js7o steering wheel had 1 button for radio, no traction, no abs, no steering power…
It was like a big Gokart with high hp…:)
Not only F1…
When TOO much technology comes in… its ain’t the same… its not puro like they say:)
@@Laurent312 Steering wheel with many buttons has been used since 1990s. Traction control 1990-1994, 2001-2008. ABS 1970s-1994. Steering power since 1990s. I'm confused about what period you are talking. Gokart with high hp maybe was before 1970s (no aerodynamics, no big downforce). Modern f1 car doesn't use any technology to help driver except anti-stall system and steering power (F3, indycar don't have it for example). And F1 is first of all competition among cars and teams. You have F2 and F3 for drivers.
Probably they really cheated. There are too much of coincidences happening to RB.
I think there is pendulum like arm in the tee that slides a sleeve left or right opening a hole to bleed off pressure to a reservoir similar to one on a shock. Just 2mm travel either way would work.😊
In a strictly engineering sense I think it’s a gray area whether that tee is a passive component. It’s a thin argument, but one could argue that it is harvesting energy from the chassis and is thus only semi-passive.
You have answered the question haven’t you.
If everyone on the grind has that part installed in the car it would be ok but in 1999 mad that rule it’s cheating regardless
Nice topic, thank you for sharing 🙂
They still have rear steering wheels! 😂
Big up ... continue
Confused
As soon as you started with the not cheating I was done. W the heck are you talking about?
Wow it took the FIA more than 2 years to figure it out
Thanks.
Absolutely Cheating
Lets be honest, that's one of those mechanically simple things that are so genius in their application that you can't help but nod your head and go... "Yeah, well done"
It’s cheating very simple
What is bad about innovation? Say that the FIA had banned carbon fiber and ground effect, because only one team was using them. One-design formulas are fundamentally boring. The design can't evolve because there is no competition. Yes Alberto we know that you drive in two different one-design formulas intended to make racing accessible not only to the super-rich but also to the average rich. The development war makes Formula 1 more exciting.
This concept pioneered by McLaren 4/12 in 1997 and banned Newey created a trick to violate a current rule. I believe RB started using this device on the RB16B that was driven by Max in 2021. This is why Max was so dominant over the past two seasons and explains why Perez can't keep up with Max because it wasn't on his car.
TY, although I'm unsure about the Perez bit.
Redbull Cheatable 😂
These types of innovations are one reason why I love F1. There was the Fan car, the F-duct, The Mass damper etc... great stuff.
Basically there's no incentive to not cheat...all teams should cheat until found out...results will stand...FIA doesn't have the intelligence to monitor every function on the cars....
is now 1000 days since the 8th championship was stolen away from Sir Lewis Hamilton and was given to red bull. golden boy and the weapon of FIA against sis Lewis Hamilton, who can't drive formula 1 car without asymmetric braking system. BBC And Skysports as Red Bull , max Verstappen promoters
Well done yet again, Alberto! Love the photos and the simplified explanation.
Max is nothing without assymetrical braking....illegal wins by max...
Great video Naska, really in depth and without bias which can be hard to find in f1 media.
love your content keep it up!
RB's innovation, a g-sensor brake axel bias adjuster is simple and practical and has benefits for road cars. Should these innovations be embraced in F1 or do they take away from the driver? I does give an advantage without question.
Thanks for the video!
Great explanation, Alberto
Ciao naska
Keep it up bro
This is why i love f1
If you have to explain that RB was not cheating... then yeah, they were cheating
God forbid a team innovates within the rules in a sport meant to foster innovation. That team cannot breathe without you guys complaining about it lol
DAS wasn't cheating, but it was banned to peg back Merc. This is one of those instances.
@@TonyUnderscore Asymmetric braking is not an innovation, it is a very old technology that can greatly improve performance. But it is a fact, it is cheating. And the regulations do not allow such cheating. Red Bull cannot pass any form of technical review. Every race their car participated in was won by cheating. Normally, they should be disqualified from the season and even disqualified from previous races. But because Red Bull has been protected by the FIA for a long time. The FIA will not do this. The FIA will only add a regulation saying that you can't do this in the future. There is a kind of interest connection here. Just like, if the FIA loses Red Bull, it will lose its biggest sponsor, so they can't do that. Ironically, the FIA's knife is stabbing Mercedes, just like Mercedes didn't give the FIA enough money.
If you have to change the rules then yeah, they weren't cheating.
If you have to explain that you weren't a girl, then yeah, you were a girl
It’s an illegal part so it’s cheating
It wasn’t illegal until now. They found a loophole. It’s the same way the rich stay rich
Just like DAS, but FIA let Mercedes to use till end of the season, if you think red bull is only one using legal / illegal part , they also talking about more teams using this trick
Great video.