@@ekt2656 Nowhere NEAR as pretty and aesthetically pleasing. Humans take in far more data through our eyes than people realize. We are visual learners. It's faster and easier to be shown than to read it ourselves.
There's something like that, in a Spanish channel called Quantum Fracture, he has like a virtual poster with (Idk if qr but) codes to his videos and stuff
Ive been so interested in quantum physics, so i got a phd in it. Such am amazing statement not that many people can say, especially as casual as he did.
I almost got it... I was so interested in how the world works, so I got 2 masters. One in physics and the other one in theoretical physics and I also completed the course work for the physics phd program. Unfortunately I wasn't interested enough/motivated enough to complete the dissertation... I kinda got stuck with the research. I was not interested in the things I could have done to get the phd. It is way to hard for me to do the research for money. So I am working as a software developer now, that's effing EASY after physics and pays much better. Once I have enough money and buy everything I need I might return into physics and research the things not someone else, but I AM interested about.
@@linuxgaminginfullhd60fps10 :D nice! It's really inspiring to see people pursue what they desire in order to fuel their interests, instead of pursuing what other people desire for them to have an interest in.
I have a phd in math and I don't know much about quantum physics, but I recognized and 'understood' most of the tokens in the map. Surely, each expert will have their criticism about the map (maybe because it's too cursory about their own subdiscipline), but I found it very well done! Especially the fact that it's topology kind of actually makes sense, in terms of how the various "regions" touch each other.
The Learning never ends, so call it silly, but i do have the hobby of asking people if i an recommend them Science-chanenl or just Education-channel in general to them! Mind if i do?
Gravitational waves in linearized gravity can be described as manifestly observable Riemann curvature tensors from Einstein's field equations. The Ricci tensor will vanish while the Riemann tensor can be nonzero as well. The components of the affine connection (Christoffel coefficients) can be given by partial differentiation. The usual notion of 'gravitational force' disappears in general relativity, replaced instead by the idea that freely falling bodies follow geodesics in spacetime. Given a spacetime metric gab and a set of spacetime coordinates xa, geodesic trajectories are given by the equation as where τ is a proper time as measured by an observer travelling along the geodesic. Dirac equation is relativistic and proves the existence of antimatter. The Klein-Gordon equation with mass parameter is... Solutions of the equation are complex-valued functions; the Laplacian acts on the space variables only. The equation is often abbreviated as where μ = mc/ħ, and □ is the d'Alembert operator. The Dirac equation relativistic spectrum is, however, easily recovered if the orbital-momentum quantum number l is replaced by total angular-momentum quantum number j. In January 1926, Schrödinger submitted for publication instead his equation, a non-relativistic approximation that predicts the Bohr energy levels of hydrogen without fine structure. .. where gαβ is the inverse of the metric tensor that is the gravitational potential field, g is the determinant of the metric tensor, ∇μ is the covariant derivative, and Γσμν is the Christoffel symbol that is the gravitational force field.
@@shilohrose2056 :D and minds as well! I feel like exposing young children to concepts such as quantum mechanics, physics, chemistry, philosophy, and so on would broaden their perspective on the subject so much more! Talent is simply pursued interests, and giving kids a larger pool to be fascinated by and look into for themselves would be so much more instead of throwing it all at them when they're older and the time has come to make large decisions. And this is coming from a kid.
*Quantum computing will turn men into gods, when it's fully achieved. I have no idea how complex it is, but they say at 1000Qubits, you have processing power that a conventional computer could not run in the lifetime of the Universe. And knowing how brute force is such a tremendous power, there are many theoretical problems that could be solved just by testing out all of the possible combinations. Lol*
Edit: The poster sales one DFTBA are working again. There was something wrong but it is all fixed now. Thanks for your patience and thanks so much for all the amazing feedback, you are all so nice! I'm having a week off right now, but will be back into video making after that, got lots of exciting ideas I can't wait to get my teeth into!😄
Please!!!! Can you answer me this? You know when a measurement happens on an entangled particle a collapse of the entire system occurs, instantly, even if the other entangled particle is on the other side of the universe. Supposedly violating relativity and the concept that nothing moves faster than light, not even information. But that is not what bothers me. The key word here is "Instantly". What does it mean? Because in relativity there is a concept of simultaneity, which literally states that the same exact thing will not happen at the same exact time depending on the speed of the observers. So if i had an entangled particle and my partner had the other one and i stayed still on earth and he went to space and moved at a speed and in a direction such that my future becomes now his present, (meanwhile my present is still his present) then i make a measurement. What is that happens at that moment? Did my particle in his past just affected his particle in his present? From his reference frame that could have not been instant, because my measurement happened in his past. What is that is happenning "instantly"at that moment when i made that measurement then? What is that happens at that moment in both our reference frames? If we cant agree that an event happened at the same time due to relativistic effects (the event being me doing the measurment) how can we agree that a collapse of the entangled system happened instantly? In what reference frame? The ether's reference frame? If we did the experiment the other way around, could the future particle affect the present one? Instantly? How could that be "instantly" thou? Maybe i dont understand these concepts of "instantly" and "simultaneity". Please i want to understand.
Gravitational waves in linearized gravity can be described as manifestly observable Riemann curvature tensors from Einstein's field equations. The Ricci tensor will vanish while the Riemann tensor can be nonzero as well. The components of the affine connection (Christoffel coefficients) can be given by partial differentiation. The usual notion of 'gravitational force' disappears in general relativity, replaced instead by the idea that freely falling bodies follow geodesics in spacetime. Given a spacetime metric gab and a set of spacetime coordinates xa, geodesic trajectories are given by the equation as where τ is a proper time as measured by an observer travelling along the geodesic. Dirac equation is relativistic and proves the existence of antimatter. The Klein-Gordon equation with mass parameter {\displaystyle m}m is Solutions of the equation are complex-valued functions; the Laplacian acts on the space variables only. The equation is often abbreviated as where μ = mc/ħ, and □ is the d'Alembert operator. The Dirac equation relativistic spectrum is, however, easily recovered if the orbital-momentum quantum number l is replaced by total angular-momentum quantum number j. In January 1926, Schrödinger submitted for publication instead his equation, a non-relativistic approximation that predicts the Bohr energy levels of hydrogen without fine structure.
Thanks! You have the right idea, but the wrong scale. "quantum physics" has 15 Million entry points today (Google search, 31 Jul 2022) The map of that cannot be stored or visualized in a linear video. Fifteen million is not a large Internet topic, but it is not simple either. Just reproducing Google (they will not just give you 15 Million results in a database) is daunting. There is massive duplication, false or incomplete leads, broken sites, spam sites, and many other thing - just on the Internet. Many of the books and papers are on paper still, locked or no longer accessible. And the data and experiments - most all are locked, badly stored, mostly lost, and in horrible mess of formats and situations. You can try to parse and understand PDFs of papers. But those have already been flattened to print format. The equations are not in symbolic math format so you can merge, compare, search, calculate, simulate, verify, test them. (That is a big problem on Wikipedia too, in case you feel inclined to help). The Vanity group for Arxiv is not really looking at the content yet. Just testing whether they can convert PDF to HTML (or HTML with some stuff). Actually treating the whole, not many doing that. If you have a real project, like CERN, just teasing out what they are doing related to quantum physics is difficult. "quantum chemistry", "quantum mechanics", "quantum solids", "quantum devices", "quantum" is a good buzz word and everyone uses it. Movies, songs, books, courses, websites. "quantum" has 444 Million entry points. There is a corpus at Brigham Young University with much of the web and many other sources. That lets you at least find all the collocates (nearby words or tokens) of a term. But having the names of things, does not really help, if you only have eyeballs and human memories to process and store things. If you are serious about mapping subjects, you need to get serious about tools for handling millions, if not billions of documents and datasets and objects. and their related apps and algorithms and systems and groups. Not for the faint hearted. If you are serious about tackling any part of "quantum" technologies, careers, industries - you have to stop memorizing facts and start gathering and organizing data, models, equations, processes, behaviors, algorithms, groups, and quantitative information on human groups and individuals. Like I say, not for the faint-hearted. Richard Collins, The Internet Foundation
Excellent presentation! I am a neurologist with only Grade 12 level formal education in Physics. All the "popular science" videos that I had watched prior to yours tend to describe Quantum Mechanics in a sensational way and ultimately talk about how General Relativity fails at the quantum level. This was a great presentation because it covered so many practical applications of the various subfields of Quantum Mechanics and the stress appears to be on explaining the topics in an easy way rather than sensationalizing. Kudos to you!
According to this video, that activity is impossible to perform, as you either know where you beer bottle is, but not its momentum. Or you know your beer bottle momentum towards your mouth, but cant anyhow know where your mouth is! :P And that phenomenon have actually happened to me even before watching this video, as alcohol particles on a beer created space-time vortex around my head creating distorted local universe so it was really hard to figure out where my drinking organs were! :/
@@BlakeTedKord I suppose around a century or two, given the pace of the advancements. However, NASA said we would reach Mars by 2000s and people said we would have flying cars by now and the whole world would go airborne so... I mean I am writing this while sitting on the sofa in a NOT flying apartment...
And I’m just a Mom of 4 I work in Customer Relations !!I have no PhD But a degree in social sciences !But I have a love for learning and understanding and This is a overall somewhat intimidating subject!But I have a EXCITING basis For building on and I’m literally typing as fast as I can so I can start researching and learning more Thank you I’m excited
Brilliant! Teachers keep teaching from lessons to lessons but never explain how they are related together. This is exactly what every student needs. Do you have a map like this for other fields of physics??
@@domainofscience hallo to you. I have the M-theory: The comprehension is the only wish about this powerfull reality. And this omnipotent reality use the free will to soddisfy the only desire he gets. Maybe the big bang is still happening in the Planck's length. Perhaps the big bang is really the greatest explosion there is but this only in the world of ideas. In the real world it is the smallest of the explosions
@@domainofscience narrative genius of Domain of Science 🧬🧫 🧪 your great learning for my fringy 🧠 brain 🧠 from my cabin fever I am very very much grateful to be a video viewer of Domain of Science
You're a legend, Dominic! Thank you so much for all these 'maps', they have been amazingly helpful in getting to know all these academic disciplines. And QM doubly so, it's really complicated.
This makes me miss our physics teacher Dr Udy.....he always went off curriculum & talked to us bout things like black holes & quarks......most interesting fun teacher ever.....RIP
20 minutes ago I was sure that my master's and career would be dedicated to geophysics (paleomagnetism, specifically), now I feel I'm back to where I began: Particle Physics. Oh boy, I feel like I'm cheating and want to get back to a toxic relationship.
@@Drachensslay Because of time. I've read that when it comes to research and real progress in a field, you should specialised in one branch. And both of them, are fields in which even the place of work are set in different type of areas or spaces. Luckily I've still have time to decide, but I've thought that up until this video I had already made up my mind. Has this ever happened to you? Any advice? Thank you for commenting!🎁 Kind regards Cameron!⚛
@@prateekgupta2408 The same thing I was told by my parents! Wisest advice ever! Thank you Prateek and for your nice, encouraging comment!🎉 Hope you have a lovely weekend🌻
Tremendous video. I'm trying to self-study the realm of quantum theory(ies) as a hobby and couldn't see the forest for the trees. This map cleared up how the various topics are connected, giving me a mental organizer. Thank you!
I have not seen a video like this anywhere. Very unique approach; very condense. It must have taken you a lot of time and many versions of this video to come up with such information dense version. What an effort.
Actually, @3:00, the reason why every particle exhibits wave-like behavior is because as you said much later in the video (almost at the end), there aren't any particles in our description of reality, only fields, described by quantum field theory. Particles aren't actually particles, with particle properties like position or momentum, but quantas, with quantum properties like countablility or spin. In fact, the wave-function is a terrible name for the state of a quantum system as it suggests it is some kind of wave, or disturbance in some field. But the wave function is not a genuine wave nor is it a field! Indeed, in non relativistic quantum particle mechanics, this wave function would depend on N*D position-like parameters (in the position basis), N being the number of particles one is describing and D being the spatial dimension (usually 3) of the system of interest. However, a true field (and wave) would only depend on D position-like parameters. Also @4:18, the Dirac equation, although introduced historically as the relativistic version of the Schrödinger equation, is actually not the relativistic equivalent of the Schrödinger equation. In fact, from a pure conceptual point of view, the two equations have nothing to do with one an other. The Schrödinger equation is all about quantum mechanics and is actually still valid in special relativistic quantum mechanics. It's just that the hamiltionian H is not p^2/(2*m)+V but rather some functional of relativistic fields such as {integral over all space of e0*E^2/2+B^2/(2*m0)} for the free electromagnetic field. On the other end, the Dirac equation is actually the simplest equation that a relativistic spin 1/2 genuine field could be described by, making the Dirac field, an actual classical field as any other classical fields. It just so happens that taking the non relativistic limit of the genuine field equation that is the Dirac equation, one gets an equation that very much ressembles the Schrödinger equation. It is only by quantizing this Dirac field (which is not actually a second quantization but the only, hence first and last, quantization) that one gets quantum properties for this Dirac field in the end.
Athena Jennings I understand most of it and the general idea of most concepts. Truth is is that we still know almost nothing about the really small. It truly is “spooky action at a distance.”- Einstein
"The Schrödinger equation is all about quantum mechanics and is actually still valid in special relativistic quantum mechanics. " This is false. If you act the Lorentz transform on the both sides, you will find it's not Lorentz invariant, hence clearly not relativistic.
Thank you for sharing! I'm looking for all I can to wrap my mind around this! So many PhD College professors can't share what they know because they don't know how to share knowledge. You are doing a great job! I'm a retired Mechanical Engineer and am just trying to use all this time I have now to exercise my mind. Thank You!
Nice breakdown of the subjects. I'm finishing up a PhD in magnetic resonance and early on it was challenging to keep all of these ideas straight. Looking forward to checking out more of your videos.
A-MA-ZING Congratulations, this is the most intuitive and comprehensive lesson I've seen on QF. It helped so much to get an idea of many different things and theories I read about QF and didnt understand their meaning or the connection between them
I've read a few books about quantum theory, and I've watched several documentaries about it over the past 25 years. This is an excellent summary of the topic. Thanks.
THANK YOU FROM 2022! Very comprehensive and made me happy to recognize a lot more than I expected before watching lol I choose Quantum studies as a lifetime hobby, and this did NOT disappoint my fascination with the entire realm of studies!
Gravitational waves in linearized gravity can be described as manifestly observable Riemann curvature tensors from Einstein's field equations. The Ricci tensor will vanish while the Riemann tensor can be nonzero as well. The components of the affine connection (Christoffel coefficients) can be given by partial differentiation. The usual notion of 'gravitational force' disappears in general relativity, replaced instead by the idea that freely falling bodies follow geodesics in spacetime. Given a spacetime metric gab and a set of spacetime coordinates xa, geodesic trajectories are given by the equation as where τ is a proper time as measured by an observer travelling along the geodesic. Dirac equation is relativistic and proves the existence of antimatter. The Klein-Gordon equation with mass parameter is.. Solutions of the equation are complex-valued functions; the Laplacian acts on the space variables only. . The equation is often abbreviated as where μ = mc/ħ, and □ is the d'Alembert operator. The Dirac equation relativistic spectrum is, however, easily recovered if the orbital-momentum quantum number l is replaced by total angular-momentum quantum number j. In January 1926, Schrödinger submitted for publication instead his equation, a non-relativistic approximation that predicts the Bohr energy levels of hydrogen without fine structure.
Great video! You touched on a lot of concepts rarely talked about on RUclips. The lack of knowledge around high Tc superconductors and the mention of topological phase transition were awesome to see included. Only one I was hoping to see but didn't was topological superconductivity and our ideas in applying it quantum computing. I personally think it's our best shot at getting around that pesky decoherence, but hey I might be a little biased. You're 100% correct though around condensed matter being freaking endless. Awesome video I look forward to the next!
Great new map! I had the impression you completely forgot magnetism. Especially so since magnets are better known by non-physicists/chemists than some of the other applied technologies you mentioned.
The Learning never ends, so call it silly, but i do have the hobby of asking people if i an recommend them Science-chanenl or just Education-channel in general to them! Mind if i do?
Quantum physics has fascinated me for years, I have been learning about it casually for a couple years and am seriously considering dedicating the better part of my life (I'm 27 now) just immersing myself completely and really tunneling in on something very specific, the driving motivation for watching this video beyond just general curiosity of quantum physics. I am a tech geek so my focus in quantum physics has largely been on most of your quantum technology examples other than squids and atomic clocks, such as new computer storage devices, understanding read and write errors in computer memory which could be crippling data loss due to the corruption of vital data, solid state electronics and lasers, even briefly investigating quantum computing (however, it's very clear that area is quite very young), et cetera, et cetera. There is a potential scientific advancement that I'm seriously considering dedicating my life and all my available current and future resources (or at least most of them) towards solving and perfecting and democratizing to advance the human species in a way only few (in my personal experience) can imagine, let alone willing to put legitimate time and effort into further investigation, God forbid the thought of investing money is mentioned. 😂 I am sure you get this all the time, do you have a discord channel or a way to just talk? I'd love to get your opinion on a couple things that potentially work harmoniously inside a larger system, which, if true, would just be a game changer. I've struggled finding an intellectual to discuss this with, that can allow themselves to turn off the part of the brain that says "No, that's impossible. Don't waste your time." And I know from past conversations how open-minded quantum physics really kind of requires one to think. So I'm curious to see what you'd have to say, privately, on the subject. I'm not particularly interested in commercializing it, I'm more interested in the applied technology which would be akin to a step change in human evolution. Just curious to pick your brain a bit if you'd be willing to. Ima buy this poster, I wonder if I could have it printed on metal like Displate 🤔
People talk about how weird the double slit experiment is or Bell's theorem, but for my money the weirdest aspect is the discrete form energy quantization takes. Emergent discreteness, as it appears in reality is way weirder than people give credit. 'discrete energy states results from their wave functions only vibrating in specific ways' is abstracting a whole lot of complexity in reality that goes well beyond the simple mathematics we use to describe and model the result we refer to as energy quantization.
@@nrrgrdn Right, my point is - that explanation encapsulates and abstracts away an enormous amount of 'weirdness' and complexity that must exist embedded within reality for that emergent discreteness to be observed. Instead of using that high-level explanation start peeling back the layers of abstraction and you'll quickly find our well tested mathematical and scientifically based models give way to nothing more than unscientific and unfalsifiable 'interpretations'. It's similar to how people take for granted, or at least express a level of comfort, with the idea that anti-matter and matter annihilate when they come in contact. That word, annihilate, or 'cancels out' encapsulates incredible complexity that requires doodles in the way of Feynman diagrams just so we can begin to describe it mathematically, let alone describe with scientific certainty any deeper understanding.
@@georganatoly6646 periodic boundary conditions can actually be explained and visualized without math. See for example ruclips.net/video/oLd-6UytkIU/видео.html from 3:30
Very informative for knowledgeable viewers in advanced electromagnetics. Amazing how Schrodinger equation lead to a complex solution which could only be solved by Bohn's theorem. Even more amazing is how time and distance do not apply to photons, time and distance do not exist.
I thought the same thing! This one visually made more sense to me than most I've seen. It does a really good job of taking the asymmetry in the current known model and configuring it in a visually symmetric pattern.
When watching your video, I noticed that some of the background music is a bit too loud, so it becomes hard to distinguish your speak from the background music. The synth music works ok with playback at 2x. Otherwise awesome.
THAT WAS SOMETHING I'VE BEEN WAITING FOR ALL MY LIFE! really, I found your channel because of quantum physics, and THIS video is just what I need in my life now.
I just happened upon this video. While I've seen and read about just about everything presented, I'd never seen it all put together in as accessible a way as has been done here. Thanks. I look forward to viewing your other videos.
Hello sir. I am 12 years old and I am learning quantum physics and thermodynamics. This video is very very very grateful and when you spoke about electromagnetic spectrum, and you are great , and I wish to solve quantum gravity problem in future
Gravitational waves in linearized gravity can be described as manifestly observable Riemann curvature tensors from Einstein's field equations. The Ricci tensor will vanish while the Riemann tensor can be nonzero as well. The components of the affine connection (Christoffel coefficients) can be given by partial differentiation. The usual notion of 'gravitational force' disappears in general relativity, replaced instead by the idea that freely falling bodies follow geodesics in spacetime. Given a spacetime metric gab and a set of spacetime coordinates xa, geodesic trajectories are given by the equation as where τ is a proper time as measured by an observer travelling along the geodesic. Dirac equation is relativistic and proves the existence of antimatter. The Klein-Gordon equation with mass parameter is... Perturbation theories and quantum fluctuations. Solutions of the equation are complex-valued functions; the Laplacian acts on the space variables only. The equation is often abbreviated as where μ = mc/ħ, and □ is the d'Alembert operator. The Dirac equation relativistic spectrum is, however, easily recovered if the orbital-momentum quantum number l is replaced by total angular-momentum quantum number j. In January 1926, Schrödinger submitted for publication instead his equation, a non-relativistic approximation that predicts the Bohr energy levels of hydrogen without fine structure. .. where gαβ is the inverse of the metric tensor that is the gravitational potential field, g is the determinant of the metric tensor, ∇μ is the covariant derivative, and Γσμν is the Christoffel symbol that is the gravitational force field.
@@zeapic8500 I suggest purchasing certain textbooks on general relativity and linear algebra with touches on matrix mechanics. A PhD level book would suffice, or even graduate-level ones. A rigorous course on QM and GR is important to be proficient in theoretical physics. EFEs are especially important as they provide lots of insight into physics. And, sure, talk Chinese, I know the language as well proficiently. Fire away.
Thank you so much bro. I've been wanting to understand a little bit about Quantum Physics for a while now, but never knew where to start! So seriously, this video is so helpful.
I recently found your channel and liked the way you present the maps of these subjects the with such clarity and information.please continue. I love your animation they are awesome. Just one suggestion you can also discuss thr timeline of any specific area in chronological order.
I hypothesize that wavefunctions are the building blocks of space(time). The expectation value tells you the likelihood of where a particle might be in a quantum system; how is this different from assigning probabilities that a resident might be in the kitchen>, bedroom>, bathroom>, livingroom>. In other words, you don't go into another universe (like the many worlds interpretation of QM suggests) if you walk from the kitchen to the livingroom. Particles in a quantum system are the same way. But if space(time) is made of wavefunctions, then how would we prove it? Answer: by capturing a quanta of spacetime. How do we do this? We already have! A quantum entanglement can be (theoretically could be) described by a wave function. Therefore, a wavefunction is a quanta of spacetime. We can test this hypothesis by showing that a quantum entanglement can behave like spacetime by exhibiting a gravity field if the photons in the entangled pair of redshifted/blueshifted.
*holy Moly, man you are a genius. If you recited all of those of the top of your head and not reading a script, wow, you blow my mind. Lol. I was able to follow most of it because I have been studying Physics as a hobby for years now*
Watching this video and thought I would ask a few questions: 1. How do you shoot a single electron? 2. How is it possible to take a “picture” of a particle? 3. How do we know that the uncertainty of a particle’s position is not just the inadequacy of the instruments we use to take pictures of particles. 4. How fast are these particles moving and in what space are they moving? 5. Water molecules are made of hydrogen and oxygen atoms and all of their sub atomic particles. Yet water can also be expressed as a wave. How is this different from light waves and particles? No need to answer. It’s just that as helpful as this video is, I am always wondering if much of the difficulty understanding and explaining quantum physics comes down to a lack of descriptive detail in explaining how physicists observe and measure the quantum world. It’s hard for mortals like me to grasp how it is even possible to do things like shoot electrons and take pictures of particles when our most advanced microscopes have only produced blurry images of atoms. Yet particles are much, much smaller.
Hi! I won't try to answer all of your questions, but I'll try to give you an idea of some things to look at that might help. 1-2) You might want to take a look at particle accelerators, how they work, and their history. Also particle detectors. There is probably some public information on the Large Hadron Collider and its detectors (ATLAS, CMS, ALICE and LHCB) that might interest you. Also, if you're specifically interested in electrons, you might want to look at stuff about the accelerator LEP (which was at CERN before the LHC). 3) This was a huge topic of debate back in the days when quantum mechanics was being formulated. You might want to look at the Einstein-Bohr debates for some of the discussion from that time. I hope that helps.
Think Like a Physicist Thanks for replying! I actually did a search on “electron gun” and a found a couple decent videos explaining how they work, how they are used and different types of guns. I am really fascinated by quantum physics, but there are times when my fascination gets overwhelmed by the teeny tinyness of the quantum world and my mind starts a tiny rebellion.
Being a high school student I have absoutely no idea where to start and it gets really confusing in RUclips. Thanks for the video. I was able to keep up with first 10 mins because we were taught about real basics of those this year in school
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
I'd love to see a clickable version of this image with links to the relevant videos.
Kinda sounds like hyperphysics
@@ekt2656 Nowhere NEAR as pretty and aesthetically pleasing. Humans take in far more data through our eyes than people realize. We are visual learners. It's faster and easier to be shown than to read it ourselves.
Great idea
There's something like that, in a Spanish channel called Quantum Fracture, he has like a virtual poster with (Idk if qr but) codes to his videos and stuff
ThaT would be awesome
Ive been so interested in quantum physics, so i got a phd in it. Such am amazing statement not that many people can say, especially as casual as he did.
I almost got it... I was so interested in how the world works, so I got 2 masters. One in physics and the other one in theoretical physics and I also completed the course work for the physics phd program. Unfortunately I wasn't interested enough/motivated enough to complete the dissertation... I kinda got stuck with the research. I was not interested in the things I could have done to get the phd. It is way to hard for me to do the research for money. So I am working as a software developer now, that's effing EASY after physics and pays much better. Once I have enough money and buy everything I need I might return into physics and research the things not someone else, but I AM interested about.
@@linuxgaminginfullhd60fps10 :D nice! It's really inspiring to see people pursue what they desire in order to fuel their interests, instead of pursuing what other people desire for them to have an interest in.
bro how to get phd in multiple fields please answer
@@prakharchaurasia8359 it's possible
I've been so interested in quantum physics that I'm hooked on watching videos that explain it. 😂😂😂
I have a phd in math and I don't know much about quantum physics, but I recognized and 'understood' most of the tokens in the map. Surely, each expert will have their criticism about the map (maybe because it's too cursory about their own subdiscipline), but I found it very well done! Especially the fact that it's topology kind of actually makes sense, in terms of how the various "regions" touch each other.
The Learning never ends,
so call it silly, but i do have the hobby of asking people if i an recommend them Science-chanenl or just Education-channel in general
to them! Mind if i do?
@@nenmaster5218 there are many channels like crash course ,sci show ,its okay to be smart and veratsium explains some
What job opportunities have you undertaken with your PHD?
Can a mathematician become astrophysicist?
Thats the subject for which i was waiting forever..
Now its hereee!
Gravitational waves in linearized gravity can be described as manifestly observable Riemann curvature tensors from Einstein's field equations. The Ricci tensor will vanish while the Riemann tensor can be nonzero as well. The components of the affine connection (Christoffel coefficients) can be given by partial differentiation. The usual notion of 'gravitational force' disappears in general relativity, replaced instead by the idea that freely falling bodies follow geodesics in spacetime. Given a spacetime metric gab and a set of spacetime coordinates xa, geodesic trajectories are given by the equation as where τ is a proper time as measured by an observer travelling along the geodesic. Dirac equation is relativistic and proves the existence of antimatter.
The Klein-Gordon equation with mass parameter is...
Solutions of the equation are complex-valued functions; the Laplacian acts on the space variables only.
The equation is often abbreviated as
where μ = mc/ħ, and □ is the d'Alembert operator. The Dirac equation relativistic spectrum is, however, easily recovered if the orbital-momentum quantum number l is replaced by total angular-momentum quantum number j. In January 1926, Schrödinger submitted for publication instead his equation, a non-relativistic approximation that predicts the Bohr energy levels of hydrogen without fine structure.
..
where gαβ is the inverse of the metric tensor that is the gravitational potential field, g is the determinant of the metric tensor, ∇μ is the covariant derivative, and Γσμν is the Christoffel symbol that is the gravitational force field.
As biologist, i love It
Ahhh that’s so exciting! We need more funding for stuff like this.
@@shilohrose2056 :D and minds as well! I feel like exposing young children to concepts such as quantum mechanics, physics, chemistry, philosophy, and so on would broaden their perspective on the subject so much more! Talent is simply pursued interests, and giving kids a larger pool to be fascinated by and look into for themselves would be so much more instead of throwing it all at them when they're older and the time has come to make large decisions. And this is coming from a kid.
Me:Why did we study this
School:Idk but here is your 5 pages of Homwork
*Quantum computing will turn men into gods, when it's fully achieved. I have no idea how complex it is, but they say at 1000Qubits, you have processing power that a conventional computer could not run in the lifetime of the Universe. And knowing how brute force is such a tremendous power, there are many theoretical problems that could be solved just by testing out all of the possible combinations. Lol*
@@ThomasJr i have to agree with you, quantum computing is so advanced it lierally seems like the next step for the evolution of civilization.
Edit: The poster sales one DFTBA are working again. There was something wrong but it is all fixed now. Thanks for your patience and thanks so much for all the amazing feedback, you are all so nice! I'm having a week off right now, but will be back into video making after that, got lots of exciting ideas I can't wait to get my teeth into!😄
Hello sir
Sir it's a humble request
Could you make videos on trigonometry and also trigonometric parallax
Mate, I think you forgot the flickr upload: www.flickr.com/photos/95869671@N08/
Love your videos btw
Please!!!! Can you answer me this?
You know when a measurement happens on an entangled particle a collapse of the entire system occurs, instantly, even if the other entangled particle is on the other side of the universe. Supposedly violating relativity and the concept that nothing moves faster than light, not even information. But that is not what bothers me. The key word here is "Instantly". What does it mean? Because in relativity there is a concept of simultaneity, which literally states that the same exact thing will not happen at the same exact time depending on the speed of the observers. So if i had an entangled particle and my partner had the other one and i stayed still on earth and he went to space and moved at a speed and in a direction such that my future becomes now his present, (meanwhile my present is still his present) then i make a measurement. What is that happens at that moment? Did my particle in his past just affected his particle in his present? From his reference frame that could have not been instant, because my measurement happened in his past. What is that is happenning "instantly"at that moment when i made that measurement then? What is that happens at that moment in both our reference frames? If we cant agree that an event happened at the same time due to relativistic effects (the event being me doing the measurment) how can we agree that a collapse of the entangled system happened instantly? In what reference frame? The ether's reference frame?
If we did the experiment the other way around, could the future particle affect the present one? Instantly? How could that be "instantly" thou?
Maybe i dont understand these concepts of "instantly" and "simultaneity".
Please i want to understand.
Gravitational waves in linearized gravity can be described as manifestly observable Riemann curvature tensors from Einstein's field equations. The Ricci tensor will vanish while the Riemann tensor can be nonzero as well. The components of the affine connection (Christoffel coefficients) can be given by partial differentiation. The usual notion of 'gravitational force' disappears in general relativity, replaced instead by the idea that freely falling bodies follow geodesics in spacetime. Given a spacetime metric gab and a set of spacetime coordinates xa, geodesic trajectories are given by the equation as where τ is a proper time as measured by an observer travelling along the geodesic. Dirac equation is relativistic and proves the existence of antimatter.
The Klein-Gordon equation with mass parameter {\displaystyle m}m is
Solutions of the equation are complex-valued functions; the Laplacian acts on the space variables only.
The equation is often abbreviated as
where μ = mc/ħ, and □ is the d'Alembert operator. The Dirac equation relativistic spectrum is, however, easily recovered if the orbital-momentum quantum number l is replaced by total angular-momentum quantum number j. In January 1926, Schrödinger submitted for publication instead his equation, a non-relativistic approximation that predicts the Bohr energy levels of hydrogen without fine structure.
@@josephlau13d77 +1
Fabulous
Edit :- next map - astronomy and astrophysics
Astrology ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Muchi Doopalot NO
YES
Yes
@@-w-. *N* *O*
If only schools embraced Domain of Science, Kurzgesagt and Brilliant...
(and others such as minute earth, tier zoo, ted ed, et.c.)
Vsauce and Veritasium too
@@Frosty-tr3ow actually🙂
And Arwin Ash channel also
And the most important one: Science Asylum.
Er vi fucking enige?!
I just love this man and his channel, the way he is teaching. I need him to talk about GEB.
Now that can get one crazy... Even the good ones
@@augustuscaeser1358 Isn't it? That would be his true step from science into philosophy, with one of the best resource of all times.
Godel, Escher, Bach?
@@CmdrShepard1001 Yes!
@@bparlan Just finished it a few weeks ago. Damn that book is thick but great!
Thanks!
You have the right idea, but the wrong scale. "quantum physics" has 15 Million entry points today (Google search, 31 Jul 2022)
The map of that cannot be stored or visualized in a linear video. Fifteen million is not a large Internet topic, but it is not simple either. Just reproducing Google (they will not just give you 15 Million results in a database) is daunting. There is massive duplication, false or incomplete leads, broken sites, spam sites, and many other thing - just on the Internet. Many of the books and papers are on paper still, locked or no longer accessible. And the data and experiments - most all are locked, badly stored, mostly lost, and in horrible mess of formats and situations.
You can try to parse and understand PDFs of papers. But those have already been flattened to print format. The equations are not in symbolic math format so you can merge, compare, search, calculate, simulate, verify, test them. (That is a big problem on Wikipedia too, in case you feel inclined to help). The Vanity group for Arxiv is not really looking at the content yet. Just testing whether they can convert PDF to HTML (or HTML with some stuff). Actually treating the whole, not many doing that.
If you have a real project, like CERN, just teasing out what they are doing related to quantum physics is difficult.
"quantum chemistry", "quantum mechanics", "quantum solids", "quantum devices", "quantum" is a good buzz word and everyone uses it. Movies, songs, books, courses, websites.
"quantum" has 444 Million entry points. There is a corpus at Brigham Young University with much of the web and many other sources. That lets you at least find all the collocates (nearby words or tokens) of a term. But having the names of things, does not really help, if you only have eyeballs and human memories to process and store things.
If you are serious about mapping subjects, you need to get serious about tools for handling millions, if not billions of documents and datasets and objects. and their related apps and algorithms and systems and groups. Not for the faint hearted.
If you are serious about tackling any part of "quantum" technologies, careers, industries - you have to stop memorizing facts and start gathering and organizing data, models, equations, processes, behaviors, algorithms, groups, and quantitative information on human groups and individuals. Like I say, not for the faint-hearted.
Richard Collins, The Internet Foundation
Excellent presentation! I am a neurologist with only Grade 12 level formal education in Physics. All the "popular science" videos that I had watched prior to yours tend to describe Quantum Mechanics in a sensational way and ultimately talk about how General Relativity fails at the quantum level. This was a great presentation because it covered so many practical applications of the various subfields of Quantum Mechanics and the stress appears to be on explaining the topics in an easy way rather than sensationalizing. Kudos to you!
Drinking game: take a shot for every time he says "quantum".
Even just a shot of milk would be a challenge.
According to this video, that activity is impossible to perform, as you either know where you beer bottle is, but not its momentum. Or you know your beer bottle momentum towards your mouth, but cant anyhow know where your mouth is! :P
And that phenomenon have actually happened to me even before watching this video, as alcohol particles on a beer created space-time vortex around my head creating distorted local universe so it was really hard to figure out where my drinking organs were! :/
@@domainofscience how far are we from teleportation tech? Or conscious transference before death, or cloning?
Take a drink every time he’s irrational. Careful, I tried it and I’m really drunk!
@@BlakeTedKord I suppose around a century or two, given the pace of the advancements. However, NASA said we would reach Mars by 2000s and people said we would have flying cars by now and the whole world would go airborne so... I mean I am writing this while sitting on the sofa in a NOT flying apartment...
And I’m just a Mom of 4 I work in Customer Relations !!I have no PhD But a degree in social sciences !But I have a love for learning and understanding and This is a overall somewhat intimidating subject!But I have a EXCITING basis For building on and I’m literally typing as fast as I can so I can start researching and learning more Thank you I’m excited
Brilliant! Teachers keep teaching from lessons to lessons but never explain how they are related together. This is exactly what every student needs. Do you have a map like this for other fields of physics??
He made one of Particle Physics.
Nice! The green-screen bit looks great! :)
All thanks to you dude! Yeah it worked great 😄
@@domainofscience plz upload more videos about nanites and nanotechnology.
By,
Your top fan 😄😊😁😃☺🙂🤗😇😶🙄😏😀......
@@domainofscience hallo to you. I have the M-theory:
The comprehension is the only wish about this powerfull reality.
And this omnipotent reality use the free will to soddisfy the only desire he gets.
Maybe the big bang is still happening in the Planck's length.
Perhaps the big bang is really the greatest explosion there is but this only in the world of ideas. In the real world it is the smallest of the explosions
@@domainofscience narrative genius of Domain of Science 🧬🧫 🧪 your great learning for my fringy 🧠 brain 🧠 from my cabin fever I am very very much grateful to be a video viewer of Domain of Science
@@nahulseyon54 000
,
This map doesn't include Quantum Physics used to fix game stories
Also the quantum physics in movies
Ah yes, and a moebius strip
Kugelblitzingularity and eigenvector and eigenvalues
eh just draw a pencil in a piece of paper, that should cover it
Also movies like Endgame
You're a legend, Dominic!
Thank you so much for all these 'maps', they have been amazingly helpful in getting to know all these academic disciplines.
And QM doubly so, it's really complicated.
This makes me miss our physics teacher Dr Udy.....he always went off curriculum & talked to us bout things like black holes & quarks......most interesting fun teacher ever.....RIP
20 minutes ago I was sure that my master's and career would be dedicated to geophysics (paleomagnetism, specifically), now I feel I'm back to where I began: Particle Physics. Oh boy, I feel like I'm cheating and want to get back to a toxic relationship.
Do whatever you love
Why not both?
@@Drachensslay yeah he can
@@Drachensslay Because of time. I've read that when it comes to research and real progress in a field, you should specialised in one branch. And both of them, are fields in which even the place of work are set in different type of areas or spaces. Luckily I've still have time to decide, but I've thought that up until this video I had already made up my mind. Has this ever happened to you? Any advice? Thank you for commenting!🎁 Kind regards Cameron!⚛
@@prateekgupta2408 The same thing I was told by my parents! Wisest advice ever! Thank you Prateek and for your nice, encouraging comment!🎉 Hope you have a lovely weekend🌻
Everything about Quantum Physics fascinates me because it answers or it may answer all the question I have(in future) about working of everything.
the music starting at 15:11 is crazy cool !!!
Tremendous video. I'm trying to self-study the realm of quantum theory(ies) as a hobby and couldn't see the forest for the trees. This map cleared up how the various topics are connected, giving me a mental organizer. Thank you!
Not many people realize how instructive and useful this video actually is 👏👏👌👌
I have not seen a video like this anywhere. Very unique approach; very condense. It must have taken you a lot of time and many versions of this video to come up with such information dense version. What an effort.
It's such as a beautiful map. Thank you for your contribution to science
I'm 13 and I think this explain it perfectly and thankfully it makes it so easy to understand. thank you.
Actually, @3:00, the reason why every particle exhibits wave-like behavior is because as you said much later in the video (almost at the end), there aren't any particles in our description of reality, only fields, described by quantum field theory. Particles aren't actually particles, with particle properties like position or momentum, but quantas, with quantum properties like countablility or spin. In fact, the wave-function is a terrible name for the state of a quantum system as it suggests it is some kind of wave, or disturbance in some field. But the wave function is not a genuine wave nor is it a field! Indeed, in non relativistic quantum particle mechanics, this wave function would depend on N*D position-like parameters (in the position basis), N being the number of particles one is describing and D being the spatial dimension (usually 3) of the system of interest. However, a true field (and wave) would only depend on D position-like parameters.
Also @4:18, the Dirac equation, although introduced historically as the relativistic version of the Schrödinger equation, is actually not the relativistic equivalent of the Schrödinger equation. In fact, from a pure conceptual point of view, the two equations have nothing to do with one an other. The Schrödinger equation is all about quantum mechanics and is actually still valid in special relativistic quantum mechanics. It's just that the hamiltionian H is not p^2/(2*m)+V but rather some functional of relativistic fields such as {integral over all space of e0*E^2/2+B^2/(2*m0)} for the free electromagnetic field. On the other end, the Dirac equation is actually the simplest equation that a relativistic spin 1/2 genuine field could be described by, making the Dirac field, an actual classical field as any other classical fields. It just so happens that taking the non relativistic limit of the genuine field equation that is the Dirac equation, one gets an equation that very much ressembles the Schrödinger equation. It is only by quantizing this Dirac field (which is not actually a second quantization but the only, hence first and last, quantization) that one gets quantum properties for this Dirac field in the end.
Wow!!!! You sure know a lot about Quantum Mechanics
@@anncf6405 Me trying to understand: Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa...
Ankit Minz saaaammmee
Athena Jennings I understand most of it and the general idea of most concepts. Truth is is that we still know almost nothing about the really small. It truly is “spooky action at a distance.”- Einstein
"The Schrödinger equation is all about quantum mechanics and is actually still valid in special relativistic quantum mechanics. " This is false. If you act the Lorentz transform on the both sides, you will find it's not Lorentz invariant, hence clearly not relativistic.
Thank you for sharing! I'm looking for all I can to wrap my mind around this! So many PhD College professors can't share what they know because they don't know how to share knowledge. You are doing a great job! I'm a retired Mechanical Engineer and am just trying to use all this time I have now to exercise my mind. Thank You!
Finally a new one! I love these types of videos!
I love Quantum physics and didn't know what all it contains. With this map, I can go through everything clearly! Thank you.
Nice breakdown of the subjects. I'm finishing up a PhD in magnetic resonance and early on it was challenging to keep all of these ideas straight. Looking forward to checking out more of your videos.
Thank you
It's very useful.
This is an absolutely fantastic video. Thanks for doing what you do! :)
A-MA-ZING
Congratulations, this is the most intuitive and comprehensive lesson I've seen on QF. It helped so much to get an idea of many different things and theories I read about QF and didnt understand their meaning or the connection between them
The lad's done it once again.
I've read a few books about quantum theory, and I've watched several documentaries about it over the past 25 years. This is an excellent summary of the topic. Thanks.
Thumps up professor fantastic.
I'm going to try to add Kurdish caption for it.
👏👏👏👏
THANK YOU FROM 2022! Very comprehensive and made me happy to recognize a lot more than I expected before watching lol I choose Quantum studies as a lifetime hobby, and this did NOT disappoint my fascination with the entire realm of studies!
Love the music in the background
great job! this kind of overview is fundamental for understanding some specif concepts trough the logical conections betwen them! thanks for that!
YESSSS I LOVE THIS CHANNEL SO MUCH THANK YOUUU, love from México 💓💓
Thank you so much for this initiative of yours, I hope all your videos get used more widely to show students the map of everything!
Videos like this make me want to go back for a PhD 3 years after I've finished my Master's...
Why dont you go for your PhD then
What subject did you study your masters?
Be sure to go into it with a emotionally strong as it a PhD is much harder than a Masters, but you can do it! Go for it!
the visualization with the motion blure gives good intuitive understanding
Me: Oh boy, let's watch this!
Also me when he says Northwest: Wait, where's that?
Gravitational waves in linearized gravity can be described as manifestly observable Riemann curvature tensors from Einstein's field equations. The Ricci tensor will vanish while the Riemann tensor can be nonzero as well. The components of the affine connection (Christoffel coefficients) can be given by partial differentiation. The usual notion of 'gravitational force' disappears in general relativity, replaced instead by the idea that freely falling bodies follow geodesics in spacetime. Given a spacetime metric gab and a set of spacetime coordinates xa, geodesic trajectories are given by the equation as where τ is a proper time as measured by an observer travelling along the geodesic. Dirac equation is relativistic and proves the existence of antimatter.
The Klein-Gordon equation with mass parameter is..
Solutions of the equation are complex-valued functions; the Laplacian acts on the space variables only.
.
The equation is often abbreviated as
where μ = mc/ħ, and □ is the d'Alembert operator. The Dirac equation relativistic spectrum is, however, easily recovered if the orbital-momentum quantum number l is replaced by total angular-momentum quantum number j. In January 1926, Schrödinger submitted for publication instead his equation, a non-relativistic approximation that predicts the Bohr energy levels of hydrogen without fine structure.
I barely survived 2 semesters during undergrad and he gets a Phd on it. Thanks! Lol
Great video! You touched on a lot of concepts rarely talked about on RUclips. The lack of knowledge around high Tc superconductors and the mention of topological phase transition were awesome to see included. Only one I was hoping to see but didn't was topological superconductivity and our ideas in applying it quantum computing. I personally think it's our best shot at getting around that pesky decoherence, but hey I might be a little biased. You're 100% correct though around condensed matter being freaking endless. Awesome video I look forward to the next!
Great new map!
I had the impression you completely forgot magnetism. Especially so since magnets are better known by non-physicists/chemists than some of the other applied technologies you mentioned.
The Learning never ends,
so call it silly, but i do have the hobby of asking people if i an recommend them Science-chanenl or just Education-channel in general
to them! Mind if i do?
This video is so useful for a recap even to people who already know all this! Helps to remember where everything fits in the grand scheme of things.
I would love to meet with a wise person like you who knows and tells physics that well! I want to be
quantum physicist one day
Your explanations are definitely among the best, clearest and most concise. Thanks for creating this content :)
Quantum physics has fascinated me for years, I have been learning about it casually for a couple years and am seriously considering dedicating the better part of my life (I'm 27 now) just immersing myself completely and really tunneling in on something very specific, the driving motivation for watching this video beyond just general curiosity of quantum physics. I am a tech geek so my focus in quantum physics has largely been on most of your quantum technology examples other than squids and atomic clocks, such as new computer storage devices, understanding read and write errors in computer memory which could be crippling data loss due to the corruption of vital data, solid state electronics and lasers, even briefly investigating quantum computing (however, it's very clear that area is quite very young), et cetera, et cetera.
There is a potential scientific advancement that I'm seriously considering dedicating my life and all my available current and future resources (or at least most of them) towards solving and perfecting and democratizing to advance the human species in a way only few (in my personal experience) can imagine, let alone willing to put legitimate time and effort into further investigation, God forbid the thought of investing money is mentioned. 😂
I am sure you get this all the time, do you have a discord channel or a way to just talk? I'd love to get your opinion on a couple things that potentially work harmoniously inside a larger system, which, if true, would just be a game changer. I've struggled finding an intellectual to discuss this with, that can allow themselves to turn off the part of the brain that says "No, that's impossible. Don't waste your time." And I know from past conversations how open-minded quantum physics really kind of requires one to think. So I'm curious to see what you'd have to say, privately, on the subject. I'm not particularly interested in commercializing it, I'm more interested in the applied technology which would be akin to a step change in human evolution. Just curious to pick your brain a bit if you'd be willing to. Ima buy this poster, I wonder if I could have it printed on metal like Displate 🤔
Sir from India salute you for this informative knowledge.
SWEET! Was waiting for this!!
Personal request: Please make a video on the history of Medicine and Surgery
Thanks!
People talk about how weird the double slit experiment is or Bell's theorem, but for my money the weirdest aspect is the discrete form energy quantization takes. Emergent discreteness, as it appears in reality is way weirder than people give credit. 'discrete energy states results from their wave functions only vibrating in specific ways' is abstracting a whole lot of complexity in reality that goes well beyond the simple mathematics we use to describe and model the result we refer to as energy quantization.
Discrete energy levels just come from periodic boundary conditions for atomic orbitals.
@@nrrgrdn Right, my point is - that explanation encapsulates and abstracts away an enormous amount of 'weirdness' and complexity that must exist embedded within reality for that emergent discreteness to be observed. Instead of using that high-level explanation start peeling back the layers of abstraction and you'll quickly find our well tested mathematical and scientifically based models give way to nothing more than unscientific and unfalsifiable 'interpretations'. It's similar to how people take for granted, or at least express a level of comfort, with the idea that anti-matter and matter annihilate when they come in contact. That word, annihilate, or 'cancels out' encapsulates incredible complexity that requires doodles in the way of Feynman diagrams just so we can begin to describe it mathematically, let alone describe with scientific certainty any deeper understanding.
@@georganatoly6646 periodic boundary conditions can actually be explained and visualized without math. See for example ruclips.net/video/oLd-6UytkIU/видео.html from 3:30
Very informative for knowledgeable viewers in advanced electromagnetics. Amazing how Schrodinger equation lead to a complex solution which could only be solved by Bohn's theorem. Even more amazing is how time and distance do not apply to photons, time and distance do not exist.
This was an amazing video!
I was wasting my time and today I found a right place to invest my time. Thanks for being here.
Next map:
The Map of Geometry
*I would suggest Geography or Economics actually*
@@theguythatmakesyoumad3834 a map of geography is just earth
@@theguythatmakesyoumad3834 Economics would be interesting!
@@fgvcosmic6752 map of cartology
i like the representation of the standard model
I thought the same thing! This one visually made more sense to me than most I've seen. It does a really good job of taking the asymmetry in the current known model and configuring it in a visually symmetric pattern.
@@wirsindhelden0 yes that makes it nice to look at and remember too
One of the best channel on RUclips for me
When watching your video, I noticed that some of the background music is a bit too loud, so it becomes hard to distinguish your speak from the background music. The synth music works ok with playback at 2x.
Otherwise awesome.
Hey thanks for the feedback, I'll tone it down a bit in the future. I find audio mixing quite challenging to be honest. Cheers!
@@domainofscience plz upload more videos about nanites and nanotechnology.
By,
Your top fan 😁😄😀😃😊☺🙂🤗😇😶😏🙄......
Can we appreciate how oddly amazing it is, that you can simulate the behaviour of a quantum system with a quantum system?
lol
13:28 - Wasn't the quantum thing about photosynthesis controversial? (Or maybe it's not anymore in 2020? IDK...)
THAT WAS SOMETHING I'VE BEEN WAITING FOR ALL MY LIFE! really, I found your channel because of quantum physics, and THIS video is just what I need in my life now.
did it take long to make?
cause quantum physics is pretty complex
I just happened upon this video. While I've seen and read about just about everything presented, I'd never seen it all put together in as accessible a way as has been done here. Thanks. I look forward to viewing your other videos.
why the f this guy doesn't have subs in millions
How many did he have?
Hello sir. I am 12 years old and I am learning quantum physics and thermodynamics. This video is very very very grateful and when you spoke about electromagnetic spectrum, and you are great , and I wish to solve quantum gravity problem in future
After listening to all this ...
"Why still I am a normal human?"
Gravitational waves in linearized gravity can be described as manifestly observable Riemann curvature tensors from Einstein's field equations. The Ricci tensor will vanish while the Riemann tensor can be nonzero as well. The components of the affine connection (Christoffel coefficients) can be given by partial differentiation. The usual notion of 'gravitational force' disappears in general relativity, replaced instead by the idea that freely falling bodies follow geodesics in spacetime. Given a spacetime metric gab and a set of spacetime coordinates xa, geodesic trajectories are given by the equation as where τ is a proper time as measured by an observer travelling along the geodesic. Dirac equation is relativistic and proves the existence of antimatter.
The Klein-Gordon equation with mass parameter is... Perturbation theories and quantum fluctuations.
Solutions of the equation are complex-valued functions; the Laplacian acts on the space variables only.
The equation is often abbreviated as
where μ = mc/ħ, and □ is the d'Alembert operator. The Dirac equation relativistic spectrum is, however, easily recovered if the orbital-momentum quantum number l is replaced by total angular-momentum quantum number j. In January 1926, Schrödinger submitted for publication instead his equation, a non-relativistic approximation that predicts the Bohr energy levels of hydrogen without fine structure.
..
where gαβ is the inverse of the metric tensor that is the gravitational potential field, g is the determinant of the metric tensor, ∇μ is the covariant derivative, and Γσμν is the Christoffel symbol that is the gravitational force field.
@@josephlau13d77 ??..
That is alright
@@zeapic8500 I suggest purchasing certain textbooks on general relativity and linear algebra with touches on matrix mechanics. A PhD level book would suffice, or even graduate-level ones. A rigorous course on QM and GR is important to be proficient in theoretical physics. EFEs are especially important as they provide lots of insight into physics. And, sure, talk Chinese, I know the language as well proficiently. Fire away.
One of the best channels I’ve ever come across!
"Quantum physics research": quantum biology and quantum chemistry...
Yup, looks like a superposition to me.
I watch your videos just for maps and for knowing how are things related
Man, I havent been this confused since my sophomore algebra 2 class
Thank you so much bro. I've been wanting to understand a little bit about Quantum Physics for a while now, but never knew where to start! So seriously, this video is so helpful.
Can you make classical physics map please please 🙏🙏🙏🙏
there is one
I recently found your channel and liked the way you present the maps of these subjects the with such clarity and information.please continue. I love your animation they are awesome. Just one suggestion you can also discuss thr timeline of any specific area in chronological order.
He is so good looking and I love his accent. 😍
I don't know why, but I am kinda hyped to just dive into quantum Phisics.
Cool map, would be even better without the quantum biology bit 😂😂
The more people can visualize this the better we all are, thanks for making this
Am I the only 14 year old who is learning quantum physics?
No you are not
14 yr olds together. Strong
@@shivangkashyapbaruah1735 yes
Me too
Nah
I just really want to thank you for making these videos. Your work I believe is brilliant.
Wow! Great job! Students of Quantum Physics should start with this video and go from there.
Thank you! I've been looking for this kind of informational video for so long!
I hypothesize that wavefunctions are the building blocks of space(time). The expectation value tells you the likelihood of where a particle might be in a quantum system; how is this different from assigning probabilities that a resident might be in the kitchen>, bedroom>, bathroom>, livingroom>. In other words, you don't go into another universe (like the many worlds interpretation of QM suggests) if you walk from the kitchen to the livingroom. Particles in a quantum system are the same way. But if space(time) is made of wavefunctions, then how would we prove it? Answer: by capturing a quanta of spacetime. How do we do this? We already have! A quantum entanglement can be (theoretically could be) described by a wave function. Therefore, a wavefunction is a quanta of spacetime. We can test this hypothesis by showing that a quantum entanglement can behave like spacetime by exhibiting a gravity field if the photons in the entangled pair of redshifted/blueshifted.
I always NEED this kind of overview map for a subject, before diving in.
School curriculums often neglect this, in my experience
*holy Moly, man you are a genius. If you recited all of those of the top of your head and not reading a script, wow, you blow my mind. Lol. I was able to follow most of it because I have been studying Physics as a hobby for years now*
This guy is one of the many brilliant people with science channels in YT.
Well done! I ordered the Map of Quantum Physics
I hope you make videos on each of the points on the map. Couple of years worth of content right there.
You are great, man🙌🏼 thanks for this
Very cool explanation, I love all your maps. Thank you dude!!
Man got so interested in quantum physics, literally did a phd in it! I appreciate your hard work, its just ingenius!
Going down the rabbit hole of quantum physics is tough but it has brought me a level of peace.
WOOOW Thank you so much for compiling this, very helpful keep it up!
Watching this video and thought I would ask a few questions:
1. How do you shoot a single electron?
2. How is it possible to take a “picture” of a particle?
3. How do we know that the uncertainty of a particle’s position is not just the inadequacy of the instruments we use to take pictures of particles.
4. How fast are these particles moving and in what space are they moving?
5. Water molecules are made of hydrogen and oxygen atoms and all of their sub atomic particles. Yet water can also be expressed as a wave. How is this different from light waves and particles?
No need to answer. It’s just that as helpful as this video is, I am always wondering if much of the difficulty understanding and explaining quantum physics comes down to a lack of descriptive detail in explaining how physicists observe and measure the quantum world. It’s hard for mortals like me to grasp how it is even possible to do things like shoot electrons and take pictures of particles when our most advanced microscopes have only produced blurry images of atoms. Yet particles are much, much smaller.
Hi!
I won't try to answer all of your questions, but I'll try to give you an idea of some things to look at that might help.
1-2) You might want to take a look at particle accelerators, how they work, and their history. Also particle detectors. There is probably some public information on the Large Hadron Collider and its detectors (ATLAS, CMS, ALICE and LHCB) that might interest you. Also, if you're specifically interested in electrons, you might want to look at stuff about the accelerator LEP (which was at CERN before the LHC).
3) This was a huge topic of debate back in the days when quantum mechanics was being formulated. You might want to look at the Einstein-Bohr debates for some of the discussion from that time.
I hope that helps.
Think Like a Physicist Thanks for replying! I actually did a search on “electron gun” and a found a couple decent videos explaining how they work, how they are used and different types of guns. I am really fascinated by quantum physics, but there are times when my fascination gets overwhelmed by the teeny tinyness of the quantum world and my mind starts a tiny rebellion.
Awesome video , this helps bring so much context to everything thrown at us in a classroom, love it
Being a high school student I have absoutely no idea where to start and it gets really confusing in RUclips. Thanks for the video. I was able to keep up with first 10 mins because we were taught about real basics of those this year in school