The Map of Quantum Physics

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 сен 2024
  • This is the Map of Quantum Physics and quantum mechanics covering everything you need to know about this field in one image. Check out this video's sponsor brilliant.org/dos
    And grab this poster here: store.dftba.co...
    I’ve been fascinated with quantum physics and quantum mechanics for a very long time and I wanted to share the subject with you so I made this map of quantum physics to lay out the ideas within the subject, to set some bounds on it so you know its not endless and to introduce you to lots of concepts that if you are interested in them you can dig deeper. When you are approaching a subject like this that’s so complicated it can be quite challenging because you don’t know where to start and you don’t know how all the concepts relate to each other so hopefully this will put everything in context.
    This playlist expands on this video with lots of other more specific videos that dive deeper: • The Map of Quantum Phy...
    #quantum #physics #DomainOfScience
    If you’d like to support my free educational content: / domainofscience
    Big shoutout to everyone who gave me feedback on twitter about the poster and a special thank you to Sarah Johnson and Chris Ferrie for their excellent fact checking.
    / sjdj
    / csferrie
    -- Posters ---
    DFTBA Store: store.dftba.co...
    RedBubble Store: www.redbubble....
    I have also made posters available for educational use which you can find here: www.flickr.com...
    - Some Awesome People --
    And many thanks to my $10 supporters on Patreon, you are awesome!
    Theodore Chu
    Sebastian
    Duong Nguyen
    Eric Epstein
    Join the gang and help support me produce free and high quality science content:
    / domainofscience
    -- My Science Books ---
    I also write science books for kids called Professor Astro Cat. You can see them all here:
    profastrocat.com
    -- Follow me around the internet --
    dominicwalliman...
    / dominicwalliman
    / dominicwalliman
    -- Credits --
    Sound effects obtained from www.zapsplat.com
    Music by Dominic Walliman
    Additional music: Verified Picasso by Scary Island, Song of Sadhana by Jesse Gallagher.
    Sherlock Holmes image by Sidney Paget

Комментарии • 1,2 тыс.

  • @flymypg
    @flymypg 4 года назад +2441

    I'd love to see a clickable version of this image with links to the relevant videos.

    • @ekt2656
      @ekt2656 4 года назад +163

      Kinda sounds like hyperphysics

    • @kevin_delaney
      @kevin_delaney 4 года назад +109

      @@ekt2656 Nowhere NEAR as pretty and aesthetically pleasing. Humans take in far more data through our eyes than people realize. We are visual learners. It's faster and easier to be shown than to read it ourselves.

    • @0042090
      @0042090 4 года назад +18

      Great idea

    • @Osalo
      @Osalo 4 года назад +26

      There's something like that, in a Spanish channel called Quantum Fracture, he has like a virtual poster with (Idk if qr but) codes to his videos and stuff

    • @MrofficialC
      @MrofficialC 4 года назад +3

      ThaT would be awesome

  • @benkazimer8746
    @benkazimer8746 4 года назад +383

    Ive been so interested in quantum physics, so i got a phd in it. Such am amazing statement not that many people can say, especially as casual as he did.

    • @3am585
      @3am585 3 года назад +3

      lets chat

    • @linuxgaminginfullhd60fps10
      @linuxgaminginfullhd60fps10 3 года назад +49

      I almost got it... I was so interested in how the world works, so I got 2 masters. One in physics and the other one in theoretical physics and I also completed the course work for the physics phd program. Unfortunately I wasn't interested enough/motivated enough to complete the dissertation... I kinda got stuck with the research. I was not interested in the things I could have done to get the phd. It is way to hard for me to do the research for money. So I am working as a software developer now, that's effing EASY after physics and pays much better. Once I have enough money and buy everything I need I might return into physics and research the things not someone else, but I AM interested about.

    • @halicusnguyen8864
      @halicusnguyen8864 3 года назад +4

      @@linuxgaminginfullhd60fps10 :D nice! It's really inspiring to see people pursue what they desire in order to fuel their interests, instead of pursuing what other people desire for them to have an interest in.

    • @prakharchaurasia8359
      @prakharchaurasia8359 3 года назад +1

      bro how to get phd in multiple fields please answer

    • @gaiusbiju6067
      @gaiusbiju6067 3 года назад

      @@prakharchaurasia8359 it's possible

  • @rv706
    @rv706 3 года назад +178

    I have a phd in math and I don't know much about quantum physics, but I recognized and 'understood' most of the tokens in the map. Surely, each expert will have their criticism about the map (maybe because it's too cursory about their own subdiscipline), but I found it very well done! Especially the fact that it's topology kind of actually makes sense, in terms of how the various "regions" touch each other.

    • @nenmaster5218
      @nenmaster5218 2 года назад +3

      The Learning never ends,
      so call it silly, but i do have the hobby of asking people if i an recommend them Science-chanenl or just Education-channel in general
      to them! Mind if i do?

    • @uzumakisasuke5026
      @uzumakisasuke5026 2 года назад

      @@nenmaster5218 there are many channels like crash course ,sci show ,its okay to be smart and veratsium explains some

    • @anonymooseuser2150
      @anonymooseuser2150 Год назад

      What job opportunities have you undertaken with your PHD?

    • @redoyanarifin4661
      @redoyanarifin4661 Год назад

      Can a mathematician become astrophysicist?

  • @gama3181
    @gama3181 4 года назад +185

    As biologist, i love It

    • @shilohrose2056
      @shilohrose2056 4 года назад +14

      Ahhh that’s so exciting! We need more funding for stuff like this.

    • @halicusnguyen8864
      @halicusnguyen8864 3 года назад +4

      @@shilohrose2056 :D and minds as well! I feel like exposing young children to concepts such as quantum mechanics, physics, chemistry, philosophy, and so on would broaden their perspective on the subject so much more! Talent is simply pursued interests, and giving kids a larger pool to be fascinated by and look into for themselves would be so much more instead of throwing it all at them when they're older and the time has come to make large decisions. And this is coming from a kid.

    • @floatytrouty
      @floatytrouty 3 года назад

      Me:Why did we study this
      School:Idk but here is your 5 pages of Homwork

    • @ThomasJr
      @ThomasJr 3 года назад +3

      *Quantum computing will turn men into gods, when it's fully achieved. I have no idea how complex it is, but they say at 1000Qubits, you have processing power that a conventional computer could not run in the lifetime of the Universe. And knowing how brute force is such a tremendous power, there are many theoretical problems that could be solved just by testing out all of the possible combinations. Lol*

    • @debadityasaha1684
      @debadityasaha1684 2 года назад +1

      @@ThomasJr i have to agree with you, quantum computing is so advanced it lierally seems like the next step for the evolution of civilization.

  • @domainofscience
    @domainofscience  4 года назад +94

    Edit: The poster sales one DFTBA are working again. There was something wrong but it is all fixed now. Thanks for your patience and thanks so much for all the amazing feedback, you are all so nice! I'm having a week off right now, but will be back into video making after that, got lots of exciting ideas I can't wait to get my teeth into!😄

    • @smitapandey5562
      @smitapandey5562 4 года назад +1

      Hello sir
      Sir it's a humble request
      Could you make videos on trigonometry and also trigonometric parallax

    • @luisgeniole369
      @luisgeniole369 4 года назад

      Mate, I think you forgot the flickr upload: www.flickr.com/photos/95869671@N08/
      Love your videos btw

    • @victorvalencia6466
      @victorvalencia6466 4 года назад

      Please!!!! Can you answer me this?
      You know when a measurement happens on an entangled particle a collapse of the entire system occurs, instantly, even if the other entangled particle is on the other side of the universe. Supposedly violating relativity and the concept that nothing moves faster than light, not even information. But that is not what bothers me. The key word here is "Instantly". What does it mean? Because in relativity there is a concept of simultaneity, which literally states that the same exact thing will not happen at the same exact time depending on the speed of the observers. So if i had an entangled particle and my partner had the other one and i stayed still on earth and he went to space and moved at a speed and in a direction such that my future becomes now his present, (meanwhile my present is still his present) then i make a measurement. What is that happens at that moment? Did my particle in his past just affected his particle in his present? From his reference frame that could have not been instant, because my measurement happened in his past. What is that is happenning "instantly"at that moment when i made that measurement then? What is that happens at that moment in both our reference frames? If we cant agree that an event happened at the same time due to relativistic effects (the event being me doing the measurment) how can we agree that a collapse of the entangled system happened instantly? In what reference frame? The ether's reference frame?
      If we did the experiment the other way around, could the future particle affect the present one? Instantly? How could that be "instantly" thou?
      Maybe i dont understand these concepts of "instantly" and "simultaneity".
      Please i want to understand.

    • @josephlau13d77
      @josephlau13d77 4 года назад +1

      Gravitational waves in linearized gravity can be described as manifestly observable Riemann curvature tensors from Einstein's field equations. The Ricci tensor will vanish while the Riemann tensor can be nonzero as well. The components of the affine connection (Christoffel coefficients) can be given by partial differentiation. The usual notion of 'gravitational force' disappears in general relativity, replaced instead by the idea that freely falling bodies follow geodesics in spacetime. Given a spacetime metric gab and a set of spacetime coordinates xa, geodesic trajectories are given by the equation as where τ is a proper time as measured by an observer travelling along the geodesic. Dirac equation is relativistic and proves the existence of antimatter.
      The Klein-Gordon equation with mass parameter {\displaystyle m}m is
      Solutions of the equation are complex-valued functions; the Laplacian acts on the space variables only.
      The equation is often abbreviated as
      where μ = mc/ħ, and □ is the d'Alembert operator. The Dirac equation relativistic spectrum is, however, easily recovered if the orbital-momentum quantum number l is replaced by total angular-momentum quantum number j. In January 1926, Schrödinger submitted for publication instead his equation, a non-relativistic approximation that predicts the Bohr energy levels of hydrogen without fine structure.

    • @Zehn2222
      @Zehn2222 4 года назад

      @@josephlau13d77 +1

  • @Akknights
    @Akknights 4 года назад +70

    Thats the subject for which i was waiting forever..
    Now its hereee!

    • @josephlau13d77
      @josephlau13d77 4 года назад

      Gravitational waves in linearized gravity can be described as manifestly observable Riemann curvature tensors from Einstein's field equations. The Ricci tensor will vanish while the Riemann tensor can be nonzero as well. The components of the affine connection (Christoffel coefficients) can be given by partial differentiation. The usual notion of 'gravitational force' disappears in general relativity, replaced instead by the idea that freely falling bodies follow geodesics in spacetime. Given a spacetime metric gab and a set of spacetime coordinates xa, geodesic trajectories are given by the equation as where τ is a proper time as measured by an observer travelling along the geodesic. Dirac equation is relativistic and proves the existence of antimatter.
      The Klein-Gordon equation with mass parameter is...
      Solutions of the equation are complex-valued functions; the Laplacian acts on the space variables only.
      The equation is often abbreviated as
      where μ = mc/ħ, and □ is the d'Alembert operator. The Dirac equation relativistic spectrum is, however, easily recovered if the orbital-momentum quantum number l is replaced by total angular-momentum quantum number j. In January 1926, Schrödinger submitted for publication instead his equation, a non-relativistic approximation that predicts the Bohr energy levels of hydrogen without fine structure.
      ..
      where gαβ is the inverse of the metric tensor that is the gravitational potential field, g is the determinant of the metric tensor, ∇μ is the covariant derivative, and Γσμν is the Christoffel symbol that is the gravitational force field.

  • @avinandan7898
    @avinandan7898 4 года назад +131

    Fabulous
    Edit :- next map - astronomy and astrophysics

  • @ΧρήστοςΑποστόλου-ψ1φ
    @ΧρήστοςΑποστόλου-ψ1φ 4 года назад +707

    If only schools embraced Domain of Science, Kurzgesagt and Brilliant...
    (and others such as minute earth, tier zoo, ted ed, et.c.)

  • @bparlan
    @bparlan 4 года назад +94

    I just love this man and his channel, the way he is teaching. I need him to talk about GEB.

    • @augustuscaeser1358
      @augustuscaeser1358 4 года назад

      Now that can get one crazy... Even the good ones

    • @bparlan
      @bparlan 4 года назад +1

      @@augustuscaeser1358 Isn't it? That would be his true step from science into philosophy, with one of the best resource of all times.

    • @CmdrShepard1001
      @CmdrShepard1001 4 года назад +2

      Godel, Escher, Bach?

    • @bparlan
      @bparlan 4 года назад +1

      @@CmdrShepard1001 Yes!

    • @CmdrShepard1001
      @CmdrShepard1001 4 года назад +1

      ​@@bparlan Just finished it a few weeks ago. Damn that book is thick but great!

  • @tanujsaaraswat7810
    @tanujsaaraswat7810 4 года назад +8

    Excellent presentation! I am a neurologist with only Grade 12 level formal education in Physics. All the "popular science" videos that I had watched prior to yours tend to describe Quantum Mechanics in a sensational way and ultimately talk about how General Relativity fails at the quantum level. This was a great presentation because it covered so many practical applications of the various subfields of Quantum Mechanics and the stress appears to be on explaining the topics in an easy way rather than sensationalizing. Kudos to you!

  • @ScopeofScience
    @ScopeofScience 4 года назад +225

    Nice! The green-screen bit looks great! :)

    • @domainofscience
      @domainofscience  4 года назад +34

      All thanks to you dude! Yeah it worked great 😄

    • @nahulseyon54
      @nahulseyon54 4 года назад +1

      @@domainofscience plz upload more videos about nanites and nanotechnology.
      By,
      Your top fan 😄😊😁😃☺🙂🤗😇😶🙄😏😀......

    • @b4byf4c3455451n
      @b4byf4c3455451n 4 года назад

      @@domainofscience hallo to you. I have the M-theory:
      The comprehension is the only wish about this powerfull reality.
      And this omnipotent reality use the free will to soddisfy the only desire he gets.
      Maybe the big bang is still happening in the Planck's length.
      Perhaps the big bang is really the greatest explosion there is but this only in the world of ideas. In the real world it is the smallest of the explosions

    • @jessevollmar2689
      @jessevollmar2689 3 года назад

      @@domainofscience narrative genius of Domain of Science 🧬🧫 🧪 your great learning for my fringy 🧠 brain 🧠 from my cabin fever I am very very much grateful to be a video viewer of Domain of Science

    • @muneebrajaraja1030
      @muneebrajaraja1030 3 года назад

      @@nahulseyon54 000
      ,

  • @alanfoss3744
    @alanfoss3744 4 года назад +47

    Tremendous video. I'm trying to self-study the realm of quantum theory(ies) as a hobby and couldn't see the forest for the trees. This map cleared up how the various topics are connected, giving me a mental organizer. Thank you!

  • @3dgar7eandro
    @3dgar7eandro 2 года назад +7

    Not many people realize how instructive and useful this video actually is 👏👏👌👌

  • @remitoinfinity
    @remitoinfinity 4 года назад +20

    Brilliant! Teachers keep teaching from lessons to lessons but never explain how they are related together. This is exactly what every student needs. Do you have a map like this for other fields of physics??

  • @enriquellerena4779
    @enriquellerena4779 4 года назад +218

    Drinking game: take a shot for every time he says "quantum".

    • @domainofscience
      @domainofscience  4 года назад +85

      Even just a shot of milk would be a challenge.

    • @timppaUT
      @timppaUT 3 года назад +16

      According to this video, that activity is impossible to perform, as you either know where you beer bottle is, but not its momentum. Or you know your beer bottle momentum towards your mouth, but cant anyhow know where your mouth is! :P
      And that phenomenon have actually happened to me even before watching this video, as alcohol particles on a beer created space-time vortex around my head creating distorted local universe so it was really hard to figure out where my drinking organs were! :/

    • @BlakeTedKord
      @BlakeTedKord 3 года назад +1

      @@domainofscience how far are we from teleportation tech? Or conscious transference before death, or cloning?

    • @hippiesmokes
      @hippiesmokes 3 года назад

      Take a drink every time he’s irrational. Careful, I tried it and I’m really drunk!

    • @fundamentalsofknowledge6902
      @fundamentalsofknowledge6902 3 года назад +1

      @@BlakeTedKord I suppose around a century or two, given the pace of the advancements. However, NASA said we would reach Mars by 2000s and people said we would have flying cars by now and the whole world would go airborne so... I mean I am writing this while sitting on the sofa in a NOT flying apartment...

  • @deetw6470
    @deetw6470 4 года назад +2

    This makes me miss our physics teacher Dr Udy.....he always went off curriculum & talked to us bout things like black holes & quarks......most interesting fun teacher ever.....RIP

  • @lesleynoblemaiden
    @lesleynoblemaiden 4 года назад +321

    20 minutes ago I was sure that my master's and career would be dedicated to geophysics (paleomagnetism, specifically), now I feel I'm back to where I began: Particle Physics. Oh boy, I feel like I'm cheating and want to get back to a toxic relationship.

    • @prateekgupta2408
      @prateekgupta2408 4 года назад +11

      Do whatever you love

    • @Drachensslay
      @Drachensslay 4 года назад +7

      Why not both?

    • @prateekgupta2408
      @prateekgupta2408 4 года назад +1

      @@Drachensslay yeah he can

    • @lesleynoblemaiden
      @lesleynoblemaiden 4 года назад +24

      @@Drachensslay Because of time. I've read that when it comes to research and real progress in a field, you should specialised in one branch. And both of them, are fields in which even the place of work are set in different type of areas or spaces. Luckily I've still have time to decide, but I've thought that up until this video I had already made up my mind. Has this ever happened to you? Any advice? Thank you for commenting!🎁 Kind regards Cameron!⚛

    • @lesleynoblemaiden
      @lesleynoblemaiden 4 года назад +2

      @@prateekgupta2408 The same thing I was told by my parents! Wisest advice ever! Thank you Prateek and for your nice, encouraging comment!🎉 Hope you have a lovely weekend🌻

  • @Star-system
    @Star-system 4 года назад +2

    Everything about Quantum Physics fascinates me because it answers or it may answer all the question I have(in future) about working of everything.

  • @shatandv
    @shatandv 4 года назад +7

    You're a legend, Dominic!
    Thank you so much for all these 'maps', they have been amazingly helpful in getting to know all these academic disciplines.
    And QM doubly so, it's really complicated.

  • @hgtrad7655
    @hgtrad7655 2 месяца назад

    Very informative for knowledgeable viewers in advanced electromagnetics. Amazing how Schrodinger equation lead to a complex solution which could only be solved by Bohn's theorem. Even more amazing is how time and distance do not apply to photons, time and distance do not exist.

  • @chrisitangonzaga4401
    @chrisitangonzaga4401 4 года назад +21

    It's such as a beautiful map. Thank you for your contribution to science

  • @niceposter4119
    @niceposter4119 3 года назад +1

    I'm 13 and I think this explain it perfectly and thankfully it makes it so easy to understand. thank you.

  • @mirijason
    @mirijason 4 года назад +37

    Actually, @3:00, the reason why every particle exhibits wave-like behavior is because as you said much later in the video (almost at the end), there aren't any particles in our description of reality, only fields, described by quantum field theory. Particles aren't actually particles, with particle properties like position or momentum, but quantas, with quantum properties like countablility or spin. In fact, the wave-function is a terrible name for the state of a quantum system as it suggests it is some kind of wave, or disturbance in some field. But the wave function is not a genuine wave nor is it a field! Indeed, in non relativistic quantum particle mechanics, this wave function would depend on N*D position-like parameters (in the position basis), N being the number of particles one is describing and D being the spatial dimension (usually 3) of the system of interest. However, a true field (and wave) would only depend on D position-like parameters.
    Also @4:18, the Dirac equation, although introduced historically as the relativistic version of the Schrödinger equation, is actually not the relativistic equivalent of the Schrödinger equation. In fact, from a pure conceptual point of view, the two equations have nothing to do with one an other. The Schrödinger equation is all about quantum mechanics and is actually still valid in special relativistic quantum mechanics. It's just that the hamiltionian H is not p^2/(2*m)+V but rather some functional of relativistic fields such as {integral over all space of e0*E^2/2+B^2/(2*m0)} for the free electromagnetic field. On the other end, the Dirac equation is actually the simplest equation that a relativistic spin 1/2 genuine field could be described by, making the Dirac field, an actual classical field as any other classical fields. It just so happens that taking the non relativistic limit of the genuine field equation that is the Dirac equation, one gets an equation that very much ressembles the Schrödinger equation. It is only by quantizing this Dirac field (which is not actually a second quantization but the only, hence first and last, quantization) that one gets quantum properties for this Dirac field in the end.

    • @anncf6405
      @anncf6405 4 года назад +3

      Wow!!!! You sure know a lot about Quantum Mechanics

    • @ankitminz5872
      @ankitminz5872 4 года назад +5

      @@anncf6405 Me trying to understand: Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa...

    • @anncf6405
      @anncf6405 4 года назад

      Ankit Minz saaaammmee

    • @anncf6405
      @anncf6405 4 года назад

      Athena Jennings I understand most of it and the general idea of most concepts. Truth is is that we still know almost nothing about the really small. It truly is “spooky action at a distance.”- Einstein

    • @MultiCoolman125
      @MultiCoolman125 4 года назад

      "The Schrödinger equation is all about quantum mechanics and is actually still valid in special relativistic quantum mechanics. " This is false. If you act the Lorentz transform on the both sides, you will find it's not Lorentz invariant, hence clearly not relativistic.

  • @kathrinawebb4927
    @kathrinawebb4927 2 года назад +1

    And I’m just a Mom of 4 I work in Customer Relations !!I have no PhD But a degree in social sciences !But I have a love for learning and understanding and This is a overall somewhat intimidating subject!But I have a EXCITING basis For building on and I’m literally typing as fast as I can so I can start researching and learning more Thank you I’m excited

  • @Cethavi
    @Cethavi 4 года назад +316

    This map doesn't include Quantum Physics used to fix game stories

    • @lightbringrr1232
      @lightbringrr1232 4 года назад +42

      Also the quantum physics in movies

    • @kugelblitzingularity304
      @kugelblitzingularity304 4 года назад +24

      Ah yes, and a moebius strip

    • @handhdhd6522
      @handhdhd6522 4 года назад +11

      Kugelblitzingularity and eigenvector and eigenvalues

    • @bayleev7494
      @bayleev7494 4 года назад +7

      eh just draw a pencil in a piece of paper, that should cover it

    • @Ben-fy3dl
      @Ben-fy3dl 4 года назад +2

      Also movies like Endgame

  • @JackEarl-zl4sv
    @JackEarl-zl4sv 4 месяца назад

    Thank you for sharing! I'm looking for all I can to wrap my mind around this! So many PhD College professors can't share what they know because they don't know how to share knowledge. You are doing a great job! I'm a retired Mechanical Engineer and am just trying to use all this time I have now to exercise my mind. Thank You!

  • @simran4222
    @simran4222 4 года назад +7

    the music starting at 15:11 is crazy cool !!!

  • @wulphstein
    @wulphstein 4 года назад

    I hypothesize that wavefunctions are the building blocks of space(time). The expectation value tells you the likelihood of where a particle might be in a quantum system; how is this different from assigning probabilities that a resident might be in the kitchen>, bedroom>, bathroom>, livingroom>. In other words, you don't go into another universe (like the many worlds interpretation of QM suggests) if you walk from the kitchen to the livingroom. Particles in a quantum system are the same way. But if space(time) is made of wavefunctions, then how would we prove it? Answer: by capturing a quanta of spacetime. How do we do this? We already have! A quantum entanglement can be (theoretically could be) described by a wave function. Therefore, a wavefunction is a quanta of spacetime. We can test this hypothesis by showing that a quantum entanglement can behave like spacetime by exhibiting a gravity field if the photons in the entangled pair of redshifted/blueshifted.

  • @kevin_delaney
    @kevin_delaney 4 года назад +4

    Quantum physics has fascinated me for years, I have been learning about it casually for a couple years and am seriously considering dedicating the better part of my life (I'm 27 now) just immersing myself completely and really tunneling in on something very specific, the driving motivation for watching this video beyond just general curiosity of quantum physics. I am a tech geek so my focus in quantum physics has largely been on most of your quantum technology examples other than squids and atomic clocks, such as new computer storage devices, understanding read and write errors in computer memory which could be crippling data loss due to the corruption of vital data, solid state electronics and lasers, even briefly investigating quantum computing (however, it's very clear that area is quite very young), et cetera, et cetera.
    There is a potential scientific advancement that I'm seriously considering dedicating my life and all my available current and future resources (or at least most of them) towards solving and perfecting and democratizing to advance the human species in a way only few (in my personal experience) can imagine, let alone willing to put legitimate time and effort into further investigation, God forbid the thought of investing money is mentioned. 😂
    I am sure you get this all the time, do you have a discord channel or a way to just talk? I'd love to get your opinion on a couple things that potentially work harmoniously inside a larger system, which, if true, would just be a game changer. I've struggled finding an intellectual to discuss this with, that can allow themselves to turn off the part of the brain that says "No, that's impossible. Don't waste your time." And I know from past conversations how open-minded quantum physics really kind of requires one to think. So I'm curious to see what you'd have to say, privately, on the subject. I'm not particularly interested in commercializing it, I'm more interested in the applied technology which would be akin to a step change in human evolution. Just curious to pick your brain a bit if you'd be willing to. Ima buy this poster, I wonder if I could have it printed on metal like Displate 🤔

  • @Name_Lessness
    @Name_Lessness Год назад

    Practicing spirituality terminology and quantum physics were able to bridge the two together. It's understanding the exact same subject and experiments but with different definitions.

  • @donaldmannikko5646
    @donaldmannikko5646 4 года назад +4

    Nice breakdown of the subjects. I'm finishing up a PhD in magnetic resonance and early on it was challenging to keep all of these ideas straight. Looking forward to checking out more of your videos.

  • @akshatnerella5995
    @akshatnerella5995 4 года назад +1

    I love Quantum physics and didn't know what all it contains. With this map, I can go through everything clearly! Thank you.

  • @jegrphy7610
    @jegrphy7610 4 года назад +9

    Thumps up professor fantastic.
    I'm going to try to add Kurdish caption for it.
    👏👏👏👏

  • @tatjanagobold2810
    @tatjanagobold2810 4 года назад +2

    Can we appreciate how oddly amazing it is, that you can simulate the behaviour of a quantum system with a quantum system?

  • @Mtmtmtmtmtmtmtmtmtmtmt
    @Mtmtmtmtmtmtmtmtmtmtmt 4 года назад +23

    This is an absolutely fantastic video. Thanks for doing what you do! :)

  • @mindz3717
    @mindz3717 3 года назад +1

    This my 7month learning about vortex math 🔸 it's so complex with universe's law math is always infitiny it easy and difficult at times but the more I study the more I learn how to read math it's part of the ecosystem also

  • @diogenesoliveira6473
    @diogenesoliveira6473 4 года назад +18

    Videos like this make me want to go back for a PhD 3 years after I've finished my Master's...

    • @vishnurahul3378
      @vishnurahul3378 4 года назад +6

      Why dont you go for your PhD then

    • @Zen_Power
      @Zen_Power 4 года назад +1

      What subject did you study your masters?

    • @o1-preview
      @o1-preview 3 года назад

      Be sure to go into it with a emotionally strong as it a PhD is much harder than a Masters, but you can do it! Go for it!

  • @Ragesomethingidk
    @Ragesomethingidk 8 месяцев назад +1

    I don't know why, but I am kinda hyped to just dive into quantum Phisics.

  • @andrew3939
    @andrew3939 4 года назад +7

    Finally a new one! I love these types of videos!

  • @inquiringhuman2582
    @inquiringhuman2582 3 года назад +1

    I was wasting my time and today I found a right place to invest my time. Thanks for being here.

  • @georganatoly6646
    @georganatoly6646 4 года назад +6

    People talk about how weird the double slit experiment is or Bell's theorem, but for my money the weirdest aspect is the discrete form energy quantization takes. Emergent discreteness, as it appears in reality is way weirder than people give credit. 'discrete energy states results from their wave functions only vibrating in specific ways' is abstracting a whole lot of complexity in reality that goes well beyond the simple mathematics we use to describe and model the result we refer to as energy quantization.

    • @nrrgrdn
      @nrrgrdn 4 года назад +1

      Discrete energy levels just come from periodic boundary conditions for atomic orbitals.

    • @georganatoly6646
      @georganatoly6646 4 года назад

      @@nrrgrdn Right, my point is - that explanation encapsulates and abstracts away an enormous amount of 'weirdness' and complexity that must exist embedded within reality for that emergent discreteness to be observed. Instead of using that high-level explanation start peeling back the layers of abstraction and you'll quickly find our well tested mathematical and scientifically based models give way to nothing more than unscientific and unfalsifiable 'interpretations'. It's similar to how people take for granted, or at least express a level of comfort, with the idea that anti-matter and matter annihilate when they come in contact. That word, annihilate, or 'cancels out' encapsulates incredible complexity that requires doodles in the way of Feynman diagrams just so we can begin to describe it mathematically, let alone describe with scientific certainty any deeper understanding.

    • @nrrgrdn
      @nrrgrdn 4 года назад

      @@georganatoly6646 periodic boundary conditions can actually be explained and visualized without math. See for example ruclips.net/video/oLd-6UytkIU/видео.html from 3:30

  • @asmitakumari4158
    @asmitakumari4158 2 года назад +1

    I watch your videos just for maps and for knowing how are things related

  • @melaniesandoval5801
    @melaniesandoval5801 4 года назад +4

    YESSSS I LOVE THIS CHANNEL SO MUCH THANK YOUUU, love from México 💓💓

  • @HeathenHammer80
    @HeathenHammer80 6 дней назад

    I was watching something from Arvin Ash where he stated that the particle is always there as a particle. He made it seem as if calculating wave functions was superfluous because there is no collapse.

  • @rahulgoswami2648
    @rahulgoswami2648 4 года назад +6

    SWEET! Was waiting for this!!
    Personal request: Please make a video on the history of Medicine and Surgery

  • @ARSENIC018
    @ARSENIC018 4 года назад +2

    It was a bit too oversimplified, but for those who don't really know much about quantum physics, it was superb.

    • @josephlau13d77
      @josephlau13d77 4 года назад

      Gravitational waves in linearized gravity can be described as manifestly observable Riemann curvature tensors from Einstein's field equations. The Ricci tensor will vanish while the Riemann tensor can be nonzero as well. The components of the affine connection (Christoffel coefficients) can be given by partial differentiation. The usual notion of 'gravitational force' disappears in general relativity, replaced instead by the idea that freely falling bodies follow geodesics in spacetime. Given a spacetime metric gab and a set of spacetime coordinates xa, geodesic trajectories are given by the equation as where τ is a proper time as measured by an observer travelling along the geodesic. Dirac equation is relativistic and proves the existence of antimatter.
      The Klein-Gordon equation with mass parameter {\displaystyle m}m is
      Solutions of the equation are complex-valued functions; the Laplacian acts on the space variables only.
      The equation is often abbreviated as..
      where μ = mc/ħ, and □ is the d'Alembert operator. The Dirac equation relativistic spectrum is, however, easily recovered if the orbital-momentum quantum number l is replaced by total angular-momentum quantum number j. In January 1926, Schrödinger submitted for publication instead his equation, a non-relativistic approximation that predicts the Bohr energy levels of hydrogen without fine structure.
      ..
      where gαβ is the inverse of the metric tensor that is the gravitational potential field, g is the determinant of the metric tensor, ∇μ is the covariant derivative, and Γσμν is the Christoffel symbol that is the gravitational force field.
      Energy for anti de sitter space is negative and also has a negative cosmological constant. An empty universe with corresponding exact solutions of the field equations.

  • @selingumusluoglu4251
    @selingumusluoglu4251 4 года назад +5

    I would love to meet with a wise person like you who knows and tells physics that well! I want to be
    quantum physicist one day

  • @najeebanks
    @najeebanks Год назад +1

    THANK YOU FROM 2022! Very comprehensive and made me happy to recognize a lot more than I expected before watching lol I choose Quantum studies as a lifetime hobby, and this did NOT disappoint my fascination with the entire realm of studies!

  • @axion4523
    @axion4523 4 года назад +15

    Me: Oh boy, let's watch this!
    Also me when he says Northwest: Wait, where's that?

    • @josephlau13d77
      @josephlau13d77 4 года назад

      Gravitational waves in linearized gravity can be described as manifestly observable Riemann curvature tensors from Einstein's field equations. The Ricci tensor will vanish while the Riemann tensor can be nonzero as well. The components of the affine connection (Christoffel coefficients) can be given by partial differentiation. The usual notion of 'gravitational force' disappears in general relativity, replaced instead by the idea that freely falling bodies follow geodesics in spacetime. Given a spacetime metric gab and a set of spacetime coordinates xa, geodesic trajectories are given by the equation as where τ is a proper time as measured by an observer travelling along the geodesic. Dirac equation is relativistic and proves the existence of antimatter.
      The Klein-Gordon equation with mass parameter is..
      Solutions of the equation are complex-valued functions; the Laplacian acts on the space variables only.
      .
      The equation is often abbreviated as
      where μ = mc/ħ, and □ is the d'Alembert operator. The Dirac equation relativistic spectrum is, however, easily recovered if the orbital-momentum quantum number l is replaced by total angular-momentum quantum number j. In January 1926, Schrödinger submitted for publication instead his equation, a non-relativistic approximation that predicts the Bohr energy levels of hydrogen without fine structure.

  • @tanujkumar1576
    @tanujkumar1576 4 года назад +1

    This video is so useful for a recap even to people who already know all this! Helps to remember where everything fits in the grand scheme of things.

  • @Miau3730
    @Miau3730 4 года назад +7

    Great new map!
    I had the impression you completely forgot magnetism. Especially so since magnets are better known by non-physicists/chemists than some of the other applied technologies you mentioned.

    • @nenmaster5218
      @nenmaster5218 2 года назад

      The Learning never ends,
      so call it silly, but i do have the hobby of asking people if i an recommend them Science-chanenl or just Education-channel in general
      to them! Mind if i do?

  • @binaymishra8659
    @binaymishra8659 3 года назад +1

    Sir from India salute you for this informative knowledge.

  • @alishaikh6352
    @alishaikh6352 3 года назад +5

    why the f this guy doesn't have subs in millions

  • @DrKerMinistry
    @DrKerMinistry 3 года назад +1

    Thank you
    It's very useful.

  • @afernandesrp
    @afernandesrp 4 года назад +9

    I barely survived 2 semesters during undergrad and he gets a Phd on it. Thanks! Lol

  • @johngiles132
    @johngiles132 Год назад

    I've read a few books about quantum theory, and I've watched several documentaries about it over the past 25 years. This is an excellent summary of the topic. Thanks.

  • @kjekelle96
    @kjekelle96 4 года назад +3

    Love the music in the background

  • @smartscience5305
    @smartscience5305 3 года назад

    Hello sir. I am 12 years old and I am learning quantum physics and thermodynamics. This video is very very very grateful and when you spoke about electromagnetic spectrum, and you are great , and I wish to solve quantum gravity problem in future

  • @HOPPIRI
    @HOPPIRI 4 года назад +5

    The lad's done it once again.

  • @caralladas76
    @caralladas76 11 месяцев назад

    A-MA-ZING
    Congratulations, this is the most intuitive and comprehensive lesson I've seen on QF. It helped so much to get an idea of many different things and theories I read about QF and didnt understand their meaning or the connection between them

  • @halalpoggers6611
    @halalpoggers6611 Год назад +5

    Cool map, would be even better without the quantum biology bit 😂😂

  • @ayssersoussi6198
    @ayssersoussi6198 2 года назад

    I have 3 questions:
    1-Is it possible to construct, in the mathematically rigorous framework of algebraic QFT, a theory in 4-dimensional spacetime that includes interactions and does not resort to perturbative methods?
    2-Given an arbitrary compact gauge group, does a non-trivial quantum Yang-Mills theory with a finite mass gap exist?
    3-Are there non-local phenomena in quantum physics? If they exist, are non-local phenomena limited to the entanglement revealed in the violations of the Bell inequalities, or can information and conserved quantities also move in a non-local way? Under what circumstances are non-local phenomena observed? What does the existence or absence of non-local phenomena imply about the fundamental structure of spacetime? How does this elucidate the proper interpretation of the fundamental nature of quantum physics?

  • @simonstrandgaard5503
    @simonstrandgaard5503 4 года назад +8

    When watching your video, I noticed that some of the background music is a bit too loud, so it becomes hard to distinguish your speak from the background music. The synth music works ok with playback at 2x.
    Otherwise awesome.

    • @domainofscience
      @domainofscience  4 года назад +7

      Hey thanks for the feedback, I'll tone it down a bit in the future. I find audio mixing quite challenging to be honest. Cheers!

    • @nahulseyon54
      @nahulseyon54 4 года назад +1

      @@domainofscience plz upload more videos about nanites and nanotechnology.
      By,
      Your top fan 😁😄😀😃😊☺🙂🤗😇😶😏🙄......

  • @danielcbalmeida
    @danielcbalmeida 4 года назад +1

    great job! this kind of overview is fundamental for understanding some specif concepts trough the logical conections betwen them! thanks for that!

  • @levitheentity4000
    @levitheentity4000 4 года назад +5

    did it take long to make?
    cause quantum physics is pretty complex

  • @tanujkumar1576
    @tanujkumar1576 4 года назад +2

    Thank you so much for this initiative of yours, I hope all your videos get used more widely to show students the map of everything!

  • @fuseteam
    @fuseteam 4 года назад +6

    i like the representation of the standard model

    • @wirsindhelden0
      @wirsindhelden0 4 года назад +1

      I thought the same thing! This one visually made more sense to me than most I've seen. It does a really good job of taking the asymmetry in the current known model and configuring it in a visually symmetric pattern.

    • @fuseteam
      @fuseteam 4 года назад

      @@wirsindhelden0 yes that makes it nice to look at and remember too

  • @SleepyOx2023
    @SleepyOx2023 Год назад

    The more people can visualize this the better we all are, thanks for making this

  • @aaronwalcott513
    @aaronwalcott513 4 года назад +20

    "Quantum physics research": quantum biology and quantum chemistry...
    Yup, looks like a superposition to me.

  • @theone4782
    @theone4782 2 года назад +1

    the visualization with the motion blure gives good intuitive understanding

  • @danielsykesvlogs
    @danielsykesvlogs 4 года назад +3

    This was an amazing video!

  • @mynameisbryanok
    @mynameisbryanok 4 года назад +2

    Great video! You touched on a lot of concepts rarely talked about on RUclips. The lack of knowledge around high Tc superconductors and the mention of topological phase transition were awesome to see included. Only one I was hoping to see but didn't was topological superconductivity and our ideas in applying it quantum computing. I personally think it's our best shot at getting around that pesky decoherence, but hey I might be a little biased. You're 100% correct though around condensed matter being freaking endless. Awesome video I look forward to the next!

  • @kaz7378
    @kaz7378 4 года назад +88

    Next map:
    The Map of Geometry

    • @theguythatmakesyoumad3834
      @theguythatmakesyoumad3834 4 года назад +8

      *I would suggest Geography or Economics actually*

    • @fgvcosmic6752
      @fgvcosmic6752 4 года назад +16

      @@theguythatmakesyoumad3834 a map of geography is just earth

    • @stepback7143
      @stepback7143 4 года назад +1

      @@theguythatmakesyoumad3834 Economics would be interesting!

    • @jorgepeterbarton
      @jorgepeterbarton 3 года назад

      @@fgvcosmic6752 map of cartology

  • @ghlscitel6714
    @ghlscitel6714 3 года назад

    Nice compact description of quantum physics in a nutshell.
    No principle error detected.

  • @rv706
    @rv706 3 года назад +5

    13:28 - Wasn't the quantum thing about photosynthesis controversial? (Or maybe it's not anymore in 2020? IDK...)

  • @ОлександраСтасюк-д2е

    THAT WAS SOMETHING I'VE BEEN WAITING FOR ALL MY LIFE! really, I found your channel because of quantum physics, and THIS video is just what I need in my life now.

  • @divyamshukla
    @divyamshukla 4 года назад +33

    After listening to all this ...
    "Why still I am a normal human?"

    • @josephlau13d77
      @josephlau13d77 4 года назад +2

      Gravitational waves in linearized gravity can be described as manifestly observable Riemann curvature tensors from Einstein's field equations. The Ricci tensor will vanish while the Riemann tensor can be nonzero as well. The components of the affine connection (Christoffel coefficients) can be given by partial differentiation. The usual notion of 'gravitational force' disappears in general relativity, replaced instead by the idea that freely falling bodies follow geodesics in spacetime. Given a spacetime metric gab and a set of spacetime coordinates xa, geodesic trajectories are given by the equation as where τ is a proper time as measured by an observer travelling along the geodesic. Dirac equation is relativistic and proves the existence of antimatter.
      The Klein-Gordon equation with mass parameter is... Perturbation theories and quantum fluctuations.
      Solutions of the equation are complex-valued functions; the Laplacian acts on the space variables only.
      The equation is often abbreviated as
      where μ = mc/ħ, and □ is the d'Alembert operator. The Dirac equation relativistic spectrum is, however, easily recovered if the orbital-momentum quantum number l is replaced by total angular-momentum quantum number j. In January 1926, Schrödinger submitted for publication instead his equation, a non-relativistic approximation that predicts the Bohr energy levels of hydrogen without fine structure.
      ..
      where gαβ is the inverse of the metric tensor that is the gravitational potential field, g is the determinant of the metric tensor, ∇μ is the covariant derivative, and Γσμν is the Christoffel symbol that is the gravitational force field.

    • @divyamshukla
      @divyamshukla 4 года назад +3

      @@josephlau13d77 ??..

    • @_yawol_
      @_yawol_ 4 года назад +1

      That is alright

    • @josephlau13d77
      @josephlau13d77 3 года назад

      @@zeapic8500 I suggest purchasing certain textbooks on general relativity and linear algebra with touches on matrix mechanics. A PhD level book would suffice, or even graduate-level ones. A rigorous course on QM and GR is important to be proficient in theoretical physics. EFEs are especially important as they provide lots of insight into physics. And, sure, talk Chinese, I know the language as well proficiently. Fire away.

  • @dattakakde1697
    @dattakakde1697 4 года назад

    Hello domain of science ,I am from India AND LOT OF LOVE FROM ❤️❤️❤️INDIA❤️❤️❤️ .it is very useful for me

  • @vikoomba7676
    @vikoomba7676 4 года назад +6

    Man, I havent been this confused since my sophomore algebra 2 class

  • @MurDocInc
    @MurDocInc Год назад

    Going down the rabbit hole of quantum physics is tough but it has brought me a level of peace.

  • @genius8077
    @genius8077 4 года назад +7

    Can you make classical physics map please please 🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @migi741
    @migi741 2 года назад

    22/3/2022, Tue, 2:01AM
    Really love listening to this to fall asleep. Educational, can't understand, but soothing to ears.

  • @cerka27
    @cerka27 4 года назад +13

    He is so good looking and I love his accent. 😍

  • @MrTLocked
    @MrTLocked Год назад

    One of the best channels I’ve ever come across!

  • @lordpineapple420
    @lordpineapple420 Год назад +5

    Am I the only 14 year old who is learning quantum physics?

  • @aanyakohli9798
    @aanyakohli9798 3 года назад +1

    I just really want to thank you for making these videos. Your work I believe is brilliant.

  • @cowgamingyt8751
    @cowgamingyt8751 3 года назад +2

    Imagine an app where it just has this pasted and you can zoom in and look at whatever you want. I definitely download

    • @o1-preview
      @o1-preview 3 года назад

      Well, he sells his maps so I guess it would be a paid app. Hey @DoS - Domain of Science, if you want to I can make that app for you!

  • @penumbraman99
    @penumbraman99 2 года назад

    Wow! Great job! Students of Quantum Physics should start with this video and go from there.

  • @MrPhillAsh
    @MrPhillAsh 5 месяцев назад

    Your explanations are definitely among the best, clearest and most concise. Thanks for creating this content :)

  • @roosh2927
    @roosh2927 2 года назад

    High temperature superconductivity works because the individual, otherwise “independent” particles have received enough energy to now be vibrating in a manner that creates a mimicking of one cohesive, uniform “particle”, as a whole.

  • @geephlips
    @geephlips 4 года назад

    Watching this video and thought I would ask a few questions:
    1. How do you shoot a single electron?
    2. How is it possible to take a “picture” of a particle?
    3. How do we know that the uncertainty of a particle’s position is not just the inadequacy of the instruments we use to take pictures of particles.
    4. How fast are these particles moving and in what space are they moving?
    5. Water molecules are made of hydrogen and oxygen atoms and all of their sub atomic particles. Yet water can also be expressed as a wave. How is this different from light waves and particles?
    No need to answer. It’s just that as helpful as this video is, I am always wondering if much of the difficulty understanding and explaining quantum physics comes down to a lack of descriptive detail in explaining how physicists observe and measure the quantum world. It’s hard for mortals like me to grasp how it is even possible to do things like shoot electrons and take pictures of particles when our most advanced microscopes have only produced blurry images of atoms. Yet particles are much, much smaller.

    • @ThinkLikeaPhysicist
      @ThinkLikeaPhysicist 4 года назад

      Hi!
      I won't try to answer all of your questions, but I'll try to give you an idea of some things to look at that might help.
      1-2) You might want to take a look at particle accelerators, how they work, and their history. Also particle detectors. There is probably some public information on the Large Hadron Collider and its detectors (ATLAS, CMS, ALICE and LHCB) that might interest you. Also, if you're specifically interested in electrons, you might want to look at stuff about the accelerator LEP (which was at CERN before the LHC).
      3) This was a huge topic of debate back in the days when quantum mechanics was being formulated. You might want to look at the Einstein-Bohr debates for some of the discussion from that time.
      I hope that helps.

    • @geephlips
      @geephlips 4 года назад

      Think Like a Physicist Thanks for replying! I actually did a search on “electron gun” and a found a couple decent videos explaining how they work, how they are used and different types of guns. I am really fascinated by quantum physics, but there are times when my fascination gets overwhelmed by the teeny tinyness of the quantum world and my mind starts a tiny rebellion.

  • @ThomasJr
    @ThomasJr 3 года назад

    *holy Moly, man you are a genius. If you recited all of those of the top of your head and not reading a script, wow, you blow my mind. Lol. I was able to follow most of it because I have been studying Physics as a hobby for years now*

  • @arunagirik8425
    @arunagirik8425 10 месяцев назад

    Great presentation on quantum physics explained beautifully

  • @thepainefultruth
    @thepainefultruth 3 года назад +1

    I'm throwing this up against the wall everywhere there's a change it might actually be heard.
    My theory is, forget all the interpretations which proposes that the universe is composed of a lot of hidden dimensions. Some would call it simple, but I prefer elegant:
    All quantum weirdness and unfathomable occurrences can be explained by the apparent fact that quantum entities exist simultaneously in local and non-local space--where non-local space is timeless and "distanceless" in an as yet unknown relationship with local space-. But quantum entanglement shows that it must exist. I suspect that the quantum interface between local and non-local spacetime, is defined by the Planck-time and Planck-length limits to the divisibility of local spacetime. I like the Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, with one intuitive modification: ***Quantum entities don't travel backward and forward in time, they just co-exit simultaneously in our 4-D spacetime, and in timeless/distanceless non-local spacetime***. Information can be transmitted instantly in non-local space because there is no distance there, but their distance is still maintained in their parallel local spacetime state.
    That makes the most sense, and so far, it's passed every thought experiment I've been able to throw at it with flying colors, including the EPR paradox. 🙂🎆
    Corollary theory #1: The Big Bang occurred when our 4 dimensions (3x distance and 1x time) were extruded(?) from non-local spacetime. The question is, were they pushed out, or did they force their way out?
    Corollary theory #2: Gravitons being the same class of quantum particle as photons, treating them the same vis a vis a simultaneous local/non-local spacetime parallel existence, could finally lead to the GUT--but I'll leave the easy part to the mathematicians.
    All the experts discussing quantum physics keep dropping the term "non-local space", but then give it short shrift or none at all. If someone had simply proposed the idea of doing the EPR experiment to see if there was evidence for non-local space instead of the other way around, we'd be light years ahead of where we are now.

  • @augustd8492
    @augustd8492 11 месяцев назад +1

    Probably, the best explanation for an average educated person. It's important you get some sequences of the whole thing. Nevertheless it must be taken as some kind of conditional vision.

  • @aepokkvulpex
    @aepokkvulpex 7 месяцев назад

    It would be cool if there was a video card placed at every moment a new topic is made, that way we'd know which ones are covered and can click straight to them! This would also be a good opportunity for video chapters; I think many of your videos would work well with that feature, honestly.

  • @JaredFrontman
    @JaredFrontman 3 года назад

    Man got so interested in quantum physics, literally did a phd in it! I appreciate your hard work, its just ingenius!

  • @HylanderSB
    @HylanderSB 3 года назад

    I just happened upon this video. While I've seen and read about just about everything presented, I'd never seen it all put together in as accessible a way as has been done here. Thanks. I look forward to viewing your other videos.

  • @negativez5298
    @negativez5298 3 года назад

    I am thoroughly satisfied with how appropriate WIMPs spells Weak Interacting Massive Particles.

  • @harishrajkumar3425
    @harishrajkumar3425 3 года назад

    Thank you so much bro. I've been wanting to understand a little bit about Quantum Physics for a while now, but never knew where to start! So seriously, this video is so helpful.