Holy shit shut your stupid fucking faces. “RODS FROM GOD ” how about you take a rod up your own colon you pond scum, because God has already abandoned you. Jesus H. Christ the only rod you ignorant swine know jack shit about is the one you stroke out to anthropomorphic plane hentai. If you took not even a tenth of a percent of the time you spend studying degenerate weeb garbage and instead skimmed the barest hint of orbital mechanics you would understand that R * ds from G * d are fucking moronic. 1. The only thing harder to get up the earth’s enormous gravity well than your fat asses is a tungsten telephone pole that weighs 100 fucking tons. I mean seriously who in their right minds thinks that that’s a feasible weapon. It costs a billion dollars just for Boeing to fuck up a suborbital capsule test, you think the space force is gonna pay 25x that just so some dipshitter can drop it on a cave dwelling insurgent? Fuck no. 2. How, in your tiny corn fed minds, do you think this thing would be controlled? The microsecond it hits atmosphere it’s gonna be in a signal blocking plasma sheath almost as big as a Reddit mod. If your target isn’t completely dead still and is smaller than a football field there is no fucking chance you actually hit where in the Sam hell shit you aimed for ALL THE WAY BACK UP IN ORBIT. And even if your Middle Eastern dictator of choice is not bouncing around in a Toyota rendering all of this preparation useless, and his command bunker is nice and large, we still get to our last problem: (edited) [7:49 PM] 3. THE THING IS LESS POWERFUL THAN A NORMAL FUCKING BOMB. Seriously, just use a normal bunker buster for normal people you undermedicated squibs. The pole only has the velocity of earths orbit, which is the maximum amount of energy that can be imparted in your stupid sci-fi chunderweapon, even before it loses half of that speed lighting up the ozone layer like Martha Stewart on a candle binge. A normal bomb of the same size is WAAAAAYYYYY more powerful and useful. And it also isn’t completely skullfucked in your MIC Defense Department Rube Goldberg jerk fest. Which brings us to our final point: why go to all this trouble to make a “not really nuclear weapon” when you can quit being a pussy and just use a nuclear weapon instead? I mean what do all you asinine brainlets think the rational reaction to this thing is? Is Putin gonna take a peak at the GIGANTIC REENTRY TRAIL overhead and think, “hmm looks like the Americans are using a new kinetic impactor system”? OF FUCKING COURSE NOT. Any sane human would immediately go fucking apeshit about the apparent nuclear first strike inbound and trigger an immediate response, making all of this non-nuclear shenaniganry useless. The Air Force didn’t make this shit for a reason, go back to huffing glue and SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU SUBHUMAN MORONS.
@@ghostlive2393 Hi I don't do RUclips anymore, but here are the tutorials guys from simulation bros made, im sure they will help. Also jojn their discord server if you want help from other people doing simulatios. ruclips.net/video/JJc4Mc7QuDc/видео.htmlsi=tWVNhJECksF1-SW1
@@ghostlive2393 Bruh it deleted my comment for links. Search up simulation bros on RUclips and look at their tutorials and also jojn their discord server for help.
Im not quite good with explosives yet but once i learn it properly i will test bunch of stuff like 152/155mm howitzer projectiles and himars as well as air dropped bombs.
whats the point? T72 uses layered armor.. each plate is relatively thin.. 80 -20mm or 50-60mm.. these would be heavily overmatched by 203mm shell.. plus the explosion would most likely tear the tank apart by itself.. its no fun getting directly hit by artillery..
@@Slavkovic_Predrag Try upper glacis next time. I understand for modeling convenience but you ignore the entire arc of the turret, lose the angle of the design, offset more than 15 degrees.
I tried simulating relikt but didn't have much luck as simulation crashed. Explosives simulations are very hard. I will start off with something smaller once i fix my main server where i did simulations.
@@nikola12nis right now I'm using my personal PC that's very dated i7 4770 12gb ram and GTX1070. Usually i would use server that has 2 times 6 core 12 threads xeon CPU and 256gb of ram but i have a hard drive issue on it.
![Tiger 1 vs M4A3E8 [MPG]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/HRca3mheJt4/mqdefault.jpg)
Will you ever be making any more simulations?
can you make a 37mm swedish apds (3,7 cm slpprj m/49) vs kv-1 upper plate at 500m? (standard kv-1, not the up-armored one)
I will have to find a good diagram on it first.
Suggestion:
The Rod from God vs an entire M1 Abrams tank
ask @simulation bros to do it they are doing those kinds of videos all the time lol.
Holy shit shut your stupid fucking faces. “RODS FROM GOD ” how about you take a rod up your own colon you pond scum, because God has already abandoned you. Jesus H. Christ the only rod you ignorant swine know jack shit about is the one you stroke out to anthropomorphic plane hentai. If you took not even a tenth of a percent of the time you spend studying degenerate weeb garbage and instead skimmed the barest hint of orbital mechanics you would understand that R * ds from G * d are fucking moronic.
1. The only thing harder to get up the earth’s enormous gravity well than your fat asses is a tungsten telephone pole that weighs 100 fucking tons. I mean seriously who in their right minds thinks that that’s a feasible weapon. It costs a billion dollars just for Boeing to fuck up a suborbital capsule test, you think the space force is gonna pay 25x that just so some dipshitter can drop it on a cave dwelling insurgent? Fuck no.
2. How, in your tiny corn fed minds, do you think this thing would be controlled? The microsecond it hits atmosphere it’s gonna be in a signal blocking plasma sheath almost as big as a Reddit mod. If your target isn’t completely dead still and is smaller than a football field there is no fucking chance you actually hit where in the Sam hell shit you aimed for ALL THE WAY BACK UP IN ORBIT. And even if your Middle Eastern dictator of choice is not bouncing around in a Toyota rendering all of this preparation useless, and his command bunker is nice and large, we still get to our last problem: (edited)
[7:49 PM]
3. THE THING IS LESS POWERFUL THAN A NORMAL FUCKING BOMB. Seriously, just use a normal bunker buster for normal people you undermedicated squibs. The pole only has the velocity of earths orbit, which is the maximum amount of energy that can be imparted in your stupid sci-fi chunderweapon, even before it loses half of that speed lighting up the ozone layer like Martha Stewart on a candle binge. A normal bomb of the same size is WAAAAAYYYYY more powerful and useful. And it also isn’t completely skullfucked in your MIC Defense Department Rube Goldberg jerk fest.
Which brings us to our final point: why go to all this trouble to make a “not really nuclear weapon” when you can quit being a pussy and just use a nuclear weapon instead? I mean what do all you asinine brainlets think the rational reaction to this thing is? Is Putin gonna take a peak at the GIGANTIC REENTRY TRAIL overhead and think, “hmm looks like the Americans are using a new kinetic impactor system”? OF FUCKING COURSE NOT. Any sane human would immediately go fucking apeshit about the apparent nuclear first strike inbound and trigger an immediate response, making all of this non-nuclear shenaniganry useless.
The Air Force didn’t make this shit for a reason, go back to huffing glue and SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU SUBHUMAN MORONS.
@@Slavkovic_Predrag maybe
Hi can you make a turtorial on how to use ansys free software to do these sorts of simulations i downloded ansys but have no idea how to use it
@@ghostlive2393 Hi I don't do RUclips anymore, but here are the tutorials guys from simulation bros made, im sure they will help. Also jojn their discord server if you want help from other people doing simulatios. ruclips.net/video/JJc4Mc7QuDc/видео.htmlsi=tWVNhJECksF1-SW1
@@ghostlive2393 Bruh it deleted my comment for links. Search up simulation bros on RUclips and look at their tutorials and also jojn their discord server for help.
Do 12,7 mm machinegun vs side VTBP Guarani armor.
BMP had no chance
how about 155 or 203mm Artillery shell vs the front plate of t72 from near vertical
Im not quite good with explosives yet but once i learn it properly i will test bunch of stuff like 152/155mm howitzer projectiles and himars as well as air dropped bombs.
whats the point? T72 uses layered armor.. each plate is relatively thin.. 80 -20mm or 50-60mm.. these would be heavily overmatched by 203mm shell.. plus the explosion would most likely tear the tank apart by itself.. its no fun getting directly hit by artillery..
@@JaM-R2TR4 curiosity
We need more videos. Pls, come back.
Can you make a korean match up of the 85mm s53 firing apcr (br-365p/367p, whichever was used at the time) vs the front of a m26 Pershing?
Can u do lightspeed velocities? If so, 30-06 Black tip ap round vs Maus.
Not really possible. It would have ♾️ energy.
@@Slavkovic_Predrag That's ok...sub'd anyway. I love this type of s**t.
Can you make Jagtiger vs Is 6 400 metres
Can you simulate body armor? Or just vehicle armor
Yes
Are you using ANSIS?
Very cool.
I'm honestly surprised how close it was to not penetrating. I bet another steel plate behind the aluminum would have stopped it.
Wdym close to not penetrating? There's still a large chunk of the penetrator left 🤨🤨
@@Lolski_924 There is, but it's going extremely slowly and has a massive deformation on the front. (half the velocity anyways)
For bt-70sh model its hardness too low.
From what I found it is around 540 brinells so i adjusted steel properties accordingly.
It's about 530BHN, harder than 2P, MIL-46100 etc. so its performance 1.2× than 2P, reduce weight about 15%.
@@Slavkovic_Predrag okay
@@Slavkovic_Predrag Try upper glacis next time. I understand for modeling convenience but you ignore the entire arc of the turret, lose the angle of the design, offset more than 15 degrees.
@@Slavkovic_Predrag and for the previous video. That's an L52 with a tungsten carbide core instead of a 3BM8
what is the name of the program?
Ansys.
Suggestion of frontal NERA armour (angled in 45º): 2,5" 600 bhn steel (Armox 600T), 5mm rubber, 1" boron or tugsten carbide, 5mm rubber, 2,5" 600 bhn steel (Armox 600T), 5mm rubber, 1" UHMWPE, 5mm rubber, 2,5" 600 bhn steel (Armox 600T).
If the gunner just turn the turret little bit to the one side the shell will pounced/non peen 😂😂
the armour is just for 12.7mm not for 30mm APDS.
It should stop 25mm full caliber AP steel ammunition.
P R O M O S M ☺️
So let us conclude the fact, that it doesn't matter where the BMP gets hit from an A-10. They are Brrrrrrt% dead in all the cases. RIP BMP-3.
Can you simulate ERA? For example, T-55 UFP with Kontact-5 vs 128mm AP projectile at like 650 m/s?
I tried simulating relikt but didn't have much luck as simulation crashed. Explosives simulations are very hard. I will start off with something smaller once i fix my main server where i did simulations.
@@Slavkovic_Predrag What kind of a setup have you got btw?
@@Slavkovic_Predrag did you tried NASA server?
@@nikola12nis right now I'm using my personal PC that's very dated i7 4770 12gb ram and GTX1070. Usually i would use server that has 2 times 6 core 12 threads xeon CPU and 256gb of ram but i have a hard drive issue on it.
@@nhatpham2206 If you can give me access i could surely try.