THE RAILWAY CHILDREN RETURN - Official Trailer - Sequel starring Sheridan Smith and Jenny Agutter
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 июл 2024
- New trailer for THE RAILWAY CHILDREN RETURN, arriving in UK cinemas on July 15th 2022.
Inspired by one of the most beloved British family films of all time, THE RAILWAY CHILDREN RETURN is an enchanting and heart-warming adventure for a new generation. Jenny Agutter resumes her role as Bobbie from the original film and is joined by Sheridan Smith (CILLA), Tom Courtenay (45 YEARS, BILLY LIAR) and John Bradley (GAME OF THRONES).
1944 - As life in Britain’s cities becomes increasingly perilous, three evacuee children - Lily (Beau Gadsdon), Pattie (Eden Hamilton) and Ted (Zac Cudby) Watts - are sent by their mother from Salford to the Yorkshire village of Oakworth.
There to meet them on the train station platform are Bobbie Waterbury (Jenny Agutter, reprising her iconic role in the original film), her daughter, Annie (Sheridan Smith), and grandson Thomas (Austin Haynes), and with their help the evacuees are soon settling into their new life in the countryside.
When the children discover injured American soldier Abe (KJ Aikens) hiding out in the railyard at Oakworth Station, they are thrust into a dangerous quest to assist their new friend who, like them, is a long way from home.
#TheRailwayChildrenReturn #TheRailwayChildren #SheridanSmith #JennyAgutter #FamilyFilm #Adventure
Sign up to our newsletter now: www.studiocanalnewsletter.co.uk
Visit our website: www.studiocanal.co.uk 
Кино
I went to school with the main girl (Beau Gadsden) for a while in Henley. Cool to see she's gotten a big part :)
Oh dear...
Jenny Agutter's voice is so lovely......
I wholeheartedly agree and it took me a while as silly as it sounds to realise that this fab lady is in "call the midwife" .. very similar voice to Joanna Lumley's voice of which I could listen to for an eternity
Sad to hear the passing of the original (and only) RC's Bernard Cribbins who really shone in the station master role.Proper character actor and national treasure.
As a kid growing up in the 70's first time seeing Bernard Cribbins was in doctor who dalek invasion of earth 2150 AD 1966 film and later on went to the tv show between 2005 and 2010, for me this is how i will remember him by and of course the British iconic classic original railway way children he was known for his comedic acting and was very well know as out British actor on our tv's back in the late 60's and 70's and the voice of the wobbles along with the carry on films
@@bioshock6935 He was also in a episode of 'Fawlty Towers' . Spooooons!
I didn't know that but i wasn't interested in that show a watch a few episodes here and there but i didn't find it to be that funny being a small kid around back then but i am sure if i went back to it now it would be fun to watch as i was classed as classic British tv show i was more into only fools and horses . Back when fawlty towers was out i was watching bless this house men on the buses terry and june please sir mind your language Citizen Smith and so many others we can name back then but i just found them more to my liking
Another remake of a classic that doesn't need it. Misses the whole essence of the original book.
Sequel, not remake.
It's a sequel to a film based on a book written by a Fabian socialist and social critic. It's not a reimagining. It's an imagining of what Bobbie might have done later in her life. And it fits. You did notice that Edith Nesbit was inspired by the story of Dreyfus in France and compared the father's false conviction with the oppression by the tsar in Russia, right? And that she put in a whole chapter about Perks' birthday to warn how some people could find charity insulting? And a chapter about canal boats for another look at class? And the time Peter steals coals and the station master is surprised because he's from an upper-class family?
@@sammartland932 Nope. They just think the film was warm and fuzzy and totally miss the 'woke' messages that run all through it.
i can already tell this is going to make me cry
Can't beat the original
@Deesar Thafaks what
@Deesar Thafaks what mess
@Deesar Thafaks l see what you mean
@Deesar Thafaks
😂😂😂 Then the film gets twisted and it’s not as if you can use a pencil to rewind it back again, like it was a cassette tape.
This one will make you vomit with all the woke virtue signalling. Very fake
Ohhh God I hate remakes. NOTHING will ever beat the original charm of Lionel Jeffries' classic masterpiece ! Not even with the fact that Jenny Agutter appears in it.
I really enjoyed watching this movie. Great story and cast.
Everyone loves the railway children
just not this version
@@practicalsargentsharp9490 The train nerds are here already 🥱
@@abeautifulview the film has not come out yet. its great how they went back to the railway where the original film was made back in 1970.
its also great how they used the LMS 4F 0-6-0 goods engine during filming. hopefully the film crews didn't upset the footplate crews again.
The original Railway Children is an all time classic movie and was my late dad’s favourites film.
What I can’t understand is why anyone would think remaking such a classic film was a good idea
Give me the original any day of the week over this rubbish.
Thought here we go again rewriting history colourblind ridiculous casting again and unfortunately I was right another film I won’t ever watch, I’ll buy the original for my grandkids.
I saw the original on release, I was 10. Loved it dearly ever since and have been to Haworth and ridden on the K&WVR. A perfect film. So I approached the sequel with trepidation. In fact after reading the critics I decided I would wait for the TV premier but my grandson asked if he could go and I could hardly refuse. It was in fact far better than I feared, when i read "updated for todays sensitivities" I did shudder but in fact the story was very well done, the incidents were based on real events and carried a compelling message. In places it was quite hard hitting. Of course it wasnt as charming as the original, nothing could be but it worked and the photography is stunning - the Yorkshire tourist board (and the railway) must surely benefit from the publicity, it looked beautiful. Theres a few throwbacks that will please you if you are a fan of the original as well as some exposition about what happened after the first film. Agutter and Sheridan are superb as to be expected but so are the children and the supports - Tom Courtenay is great and the cheeky station keeper I didnt realise until the credits, is supposed to be Perks' (the late Bernard Cribbins) son. I was disappointed that red flannel petticoats did not make an appearance no doubt having gone out of fashion and Bobbie's famous line was not reprised - well not totally, I cant be sure as at that moment a piece of soot from the loco must have got in my eyes as it started watering for some reason. If you loved the original and think it could never be bettered than you are right but this is a different take and I think it worked very well.
I also love the original a 10 out of 10 for me. I've not seen the "return" but am fearful.....
@@rogerlincoln6802 As long as you dont expect it to be a "remake" and consider its set in different times I thought it was much better than I feared too! On balance I enjoyed it and would say its a worthy film. Worth a watch but it wont replace (and I dont think it ever wanted to) the original.
@Bessie Hillum sorry I don't understand your meaning.
Spoilers.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The main theme of the film was fine, but it should have been a 15-minute segment, in the vein of the Hound in the first film. There just wasn't enough material there to stretch it out to a whole film. I spent the first half of the film waiting for it to start, and the next half waiting for it to end.
There are many problems with the film, such as trains not having toilets and the food fight in a time when there was strict rationing. They would have been short of food by the end of the week.
They showed a locomotive where you could clearly see the British Railways totem on the tender. A totem that didn't appear until 1956. They used CGI a lot in the early scenes. They could have CGI'd that out.
Some railway jobs were reserved occupations, but that would not have included porters at country stations. Perks would have been called up to serve in the armed services. They missed a trick by not having Perks' granddaughter as porter. I never noticed that he was supposed to be Perks grandson either. He seemed to be far too young to be his grandson. The film was set in 1944, only 39 years after the first film and Perks' children were all quite young.
Jenny Agutter was hardly in the film. I'd say her part would be best described as a cameo appearance. Sheridan Smith's part wasn't much bigger.
I can't see Booby associating herself with the violent bombing campaign of the Suffragettes. The Suffragettes only campaigned for the rights of women with property to have the vote. They opposed giving the vote to ordinary women. Bobby would have been far more likely to have been a member of the Suffragists, who campaigned peacefully for the right of EVERY woman to vote.
Father would have been too old to fight in WWI, so how would he have been killed in the war? His employment at the Foreign Office would have precluded him fighting on the front line anyway. He would know too many secrets. Maybe he was hit by a bomb dropped by a Zeppelin?
I couldn't see the point of Tom Courtney. Such a pity that they couldn't get Garry Warren to reprise his part.
I found that the part where the American Military Police arrested and imprisoned a British girl to be completely unbelievable. They would have absolutely no authority to do that. It would be as ludicrous as a British MP arresting an American civilian in the USA.
I couldn't understand the reason why all the children rushed out to stop the train?
I found the cinematography to be dull, as if it was made with a 1980s video camera.
There are things explained in the 1968 TV version of The Railway Children that aren't explain in the book or the 1970 film.
How could they afford such a big house when they are supposed to be poor? Because it was owned by one of their rich relatives who allowed them to use it.
Red flannel petticoats were out of fashion by 1905 too. Mother had an old-fashioned dress sense.
Why can't they leave good Films and series alone,why is it that there have to fuck everything Up!!!!!
To give you something to grump about...
@@marty8535 it is with it shows that the film industry lost on new films
Your reply sickens me, let's give this film a chance for a new generation.
Sie sollten antworten sehen
@@yorkshire6458 Dein Deutsch ist wirklich nicht sehr gut, oder?
We r gonna watch this in the cinema on a field trip
This looks quite cool actually, reminds me of Paddington
Why, cause it's English?
@@moncey1120 Yes
Because Paddington was based off an old movie and was a British classic. This also is a old movie released 2000, British classic the Railway children.
@@nobodycares1134 the so called modern "Paddington" is not Paddington at all but just fake woke propaganda that has nothing to do with the real stories. Just like this fake railway children monstrosity.
@@nobodycares1134 Actually it is older than 2000. The original movie was released in 1970. The 2000 movie is just a remake of the 1970 movie.
I went to see this film on the opening weekend and I appreciated this film and goes down well alongside the original film.
I watched it today it was amazing in my opinion.
It was a great sequel when I saw it yesterday. Not as good as the original, but it was very epic and had a great moral.
no cribbins?
@@markwhelan8233 No. He doesn’t return in this film. But Bobbie’s Actresses Jenny Agutter did.
@@josephmarrison4606 Thank you:)
@@markwhelan8233 You’re welcome.
something is either epic or not eipc but cannot be 'very' epic.
I'll definitely watch this film ♥️
With friends at Voicely, can't wait release
I've only just realised that the fabulous lady Jenny Agutter who played the Daughter "Bobbie" in the original 1970 version is in this version as the very same character, I mean How very cool is that !
She has been in every adaption. The 1960's BBC TV series, the 70's movie, the TV movie remake and this.
KENNY THE GOAT
Black-Washing - What a shock!
Looks "magical"....
This is my favourite movie it's so great
why did they bother? stick with the original its a great entertaining film
Because they need to use the name and fame of the first, to push the agenda of this supposed sequel.
Not to mention the political correctness
Needed wokewashing in certain ways.
Please clarify what ‘political correctness’ is in this movie? I cannot think of a single thing that could make you think this movie is ‘woke’
My favourite movie along with the original ❤
Finally a good movie!!😊
I read the classic novel and it will be one of the best written work in that times
I saw on DVD was fantastic.
I went to the cinema with my school today and the film was great she should watch it
"Evil cannot create anything new, they can only corrupt and ruin what good forces have already invented or made"
get a grip dude.. its a movie
Tolkien.
Lol woke might be overdone but the things it fights against are the real evil, you know all the bad things that people actually did in the past
@Bessie HillumCare to explain why?
@Bessie Hillum Now like how is it destroying sociaty? like your just saying it is when all i see is it destroying some movies, There are like endless of examples of history where the few in power have literally caused mass death and suffering Like they are gonna be thinking of chaiman Mao just like as bad as the terminater movie was lol it didnt cause the death of possible 45 million people like Mao did
Just been to see this movie and its great👍🏼
Salam sis please can you help me about English....?
This is a great movie guys!
Great seeing Samwell Tarly going about so jolly.
im going to see it tomorrow, the trailer looks amazing
KENNY GONNA CARRY
i bet it took them ages to figure out a way to squeeze a black character into the railway children
Dude, this takes place in World War Two. Ask any historian and they’ll tell you all about how important black people were in ww2 for the British side.
About as much as it took for you to Google how to spell character
I didn't even know this movie existed until I stumbled on this, I'm so excited to see it!! 🥳🥳🥳
This film looks fantastic. I remember the original with Jenny Agutter in it so this one should be good as well. I can't wait to see it
Love Jenny Agutter in call the midwife and the original railway children so will definitely book tickets to see this film in the cinema
Only been 52 years... still can't wait though :)
No way in that year minority kid can roaming freely in europe
Poor people in general could not.
Apart from that. This was meant to appeal to a modern audience, whom no nothing of history.
@@Valen-xu2wy as do many of the commentaters her
@@marty8535 I know my own history and those shite is just more anti White ite propaganda
Well screw the modern audience diversity is ruining movies
🎣
RIP Bernard Cribbins.😔
going to see this tmr :D
Doesn't follow the author's version.
Which author is that?
@@marty8535 Obviously Edith Nesbit 🤦♂️
@@gerardhiggins4827 she isn't the author though
This is a sequel, Jenny Agutter is playing the SAME PERSON. Or are you just a bit dense.
@@melanierhianna Must you be so impolite?
Young stud Kenny Aikens is on a mission
Great movie
I love love railway children ❤️ 💕
i wtched this today for a shcholl trip soo good
When will we watch the film?
I have seen this film today (as this comment is being written), and I really enjoyed this film. I don't think its better than the orginal but I think this is a really solid sequel. With the dislike extension installed, i don't get why this has more dislikes than likes tbh.
Because it's terrible.
@NotLibran7 The original Railway Children? Of course that isn't terrible. The "sequel" is.
@@Sajid_A829 Loved the original. This 'version' was um... yeah, really terrible.
We wuz Railway Children.
🤣
Watched it all the American is brave and the big girl
Locomotives seen in the trailer:
LMS 4F
LMS black 5
Baldwin USATC S160
Not a black five a jubilee mate
No Brown Pannier or Green Dragon in this one mate. You just get plain ol' BR black.
This is the funniest movie ever. I love how they had so many Caucasian people befriend a black person. There is true humanity in this world 🥰🥰
It actually happened in Britain during WWII>
They want to destroy/re-imagine everything that we've ever had. Everything. I can't watch a single advert without them being pushed down my throat. Movies, tv, music, adverts, history, literally everything.
They're not reimagining anything. This takes nothing away from the original Edwardian tale by following what happened to Bobbie in later life - specifically WW2 - and thos evacuees that would have been sent somewhere like Oakworth.
We want to tell what ACTUALLY happened not some rose tinted white boomer racists view of the world!
Get used to it.
Who
@@jamesoreilly7311 "WhO 🤪"
DIVERSITY IS OUR STRENGTH!
Oakworth = Wokeworth.
The sarcasm is strong with this one.
Its our weakness it ruins everything
Is it, so why is there so much hate for this movie, and diversity woke crap in general. Is that your idea of STRENGH. you have an illness.
It's part and parcel of going to the cinema
It looks good
I had a bet with my cousin that the hider in the barn would be a POC. When will it ever end?
People of colour were historically crucial at this point in time. Put your big boy pants on and admit you hide behind hating ‘woke’ culture to avoid saying you’re racist.
@@mrdinklesplat You are so disingenuous. You know wery well why the boy in the barn was is in the film - and it has nothing at all to do with being "historically accurate". You need to avoid being an apologist. x
@@charlottecarlton-moss1045 the boy was in the barn because he’s a major character to the plot. Stop crying over a movie
@@mrdinklesplat Its not a movie its every single peice of visual and audio media in western society is moulded around pushing a false narrative and twisting history.
First they re-did The Secret Garden, now this? At this rate I’m expecting Nick Fury to turn up in the ending credits saying “I’m putting together a team of people with unexceptional abilities.”
It isn't a remake it's a seaqual get ur facts right 🤦🏻
But that would be awesome
@Daniel rogers It would!
Honestly I wouldn’t even be mad at that
@@informationyes They did a remakes in the early 2000's as far as I know but I haven't seen it.
Okaaaaay….? Where’s Phyllis and Peter?
Dead
I think Phyllis is mentioned. I could be wrong
They are in the channel with a 100 other Peters on a inflatable dinghy
I wanted there to be a post credit scene where they show up at Bobbie's house and they re-unite but when did anyone love big family reunion moments in the Railway Children?
I just went to see this. I didn’t see the original. I will give my opinion; it was a good movie. Usually I struggle to follow the plots of adult movies - I prefer kids’ movies (not mainly for that reason though). This one, however, I could follow. I’m a bit shabby on the details, but I liked the conflict/racism side of it (not meant in a racist way - I am against racism). I find ww2 quite interesting to learn about (and the Holocaust, as awful and upsetting as that is. (Again, not meant in an offensive way). I’d give this movie 3 1/2 stars out of 5.
ok
I agree that WWII is a fascinating period of history.
You must see the original of The Railway Children though. Delightful film and easy to follow. I have literally just mow found out about this sequel being made and it's good to read the positive comments about it. It would have been sad if it was terrible.
I don’t mind what they did however if your talking 1940 in England for instance you’d want maybe a German defector to be the one their hiding or Maybe another country from WW2
I see what you did there.
He is from another country, the USA
Yea but had to be where could use a Black person surprise surprise.
@@garethtomkins5797 what's the problem with a character being black?
@@davidmundow1074 here we go.... Nothing wrong except every movie or show made now from Britain or America has got to have a Black character in whatever the setting. They say because of diversity yea OK very rarely see other nationality but guaranteed a Black. Why!! Because they the ones who make the most fuss ffs. If you don't like what I say honestly I could care less it's my opinion
Call suspicion a sign of the times. But is this more pre-programming 🤔
Of course it is, it's every single film, and directors that don't go along with it don't get funding
@@brianbadonde8700 Thank God I'm not the only one who spotted this. Bless you.
@@brianbadonde8700 Kenneth Branagh says that he had to begrudgingly shoehorn in minorities into "Belfast" otherwise he wouldn't have got the funding.
they are flooding your countries with them and rewriting all of your history to
The Shekelgoblins at work carrying out their genocidal anti-white religious prophecy.
This doesn’t look like a bad film, but I don’t know if anyone has noticed this, but children’s movies set in the Edwardian Era that get a sequel are usually set during World War 2 .
Railway Children both adaptation 1970 and early 2000 (Edwardian era)
Railway Children Returns(1940s)
Five Children and It (BBC) Edwardian
Five Children and It (2004) :I think this one was World War 1 , come to think of it.
Secret Garden 1970s 1980s and 1994(the most famous well known version) Edwardian Era
Return to Secret Garden (World War 2)
Nanny McPhee (Edwardian)
Nanny McPhee Returns(World War 2)
Even Peter Pan Returns was set during World War 2.
cant say I'm looking forward to this and why do you need to have americans in it
Because it's a part of the storyline. Duh!
@@marty8535 naaah it just feels to me that they are only there to apeel to an american audience, which i feel it shouldnt have to do that
@@DafyddBrooks There were large numbers of US personel in UK at this time.
@@DafyddBrooks I'm American and I feel the same. A British film like this should not have Americans in it. I think it would appeal more to the English and Americans if it didn't have. And they went woke. I think that's their true reason for having an American in it.
@@marty8535 in yorkshire???? but its not only that, they deliberately put the movie in world war 2 in order for that to happen and its just too lazy as opposed to it coming up with something more orginal. besides imagine if 'swallows and amazons' remake had Americans in it? it would be shit :(
that kj aikens guy was in my careers class senior year or last year thats crazy i didnt even know that
Little surprised and a little shocked tat the LBGTQi+ community were not represented in the film.
They were. You'd know that if you knew anything about Edith Nesbit.
@@Poliss95 OK in what way were they represented in the film?
Trying to ruin another childhood favoirite I see.
yes , that's what they are trying to do. it's a disgrace.
Yes, unfortunately the woke brigade are at it again. They insist on diversity and multiculturalism but at the cost of ruining a purely British children's classic.
@@davegalea6689 I’ll be watching this film as I loved the original and can’t wait for new adventures also I’ve read the book of the film.
The saying is never judge a book by its cover
They can normalise multiculturalism and younger heads will except it, us English built the taj mahal and the great Wall of China. Its just as absurd but why not put that out there
i'm in Cardiff Wales
where's the AMC Theatres !?
1:34 At least Big Jim get's his role!
BIG KENNY AIKENS NOT THE LITTLE ONE🥳
Why......the original was much better I'll give this a big miss
And me
Why do so many people dislike this movie I saw it and I loved it.
It's a very nice movie with values and morals. Love it.
Woke and inaccurate
❤️❤️
What class of locomotive is that
LMS 4F
@@nimratsekhon8909 cool
We must put black people in the film
Wont be considered for a an award if not.
put in = have the entire plot revolve around
Was this really necessary? 😐
2:07 Gordon’s All Engines Go whistle sound!
im only here for Kenny Aikens. all the them other goons are MID!
Ong bruh Anyone who isn't Kenny Aikens will probably have B tier acting
Omg 😭
Fr tho
LMFAO LIONEL
so true
It's based in rural Yorkshire at a certain period in time. Get over that it is "NOT" racist, not to depict black character's from place and time when there wouldn't have been any.. otherwise make the film pure fantasy
There would have been thousands of black GIs in England at this time. And treated appallingly under Jim Crow laws.
It includes a black American soldier, of which there were some when they came over to England.
@@SPM0717 150,000 of them, in fact.
It has been adapted for the screen several times, of which the 1970 film version is the best known.
So sick of seeing Sheridan Smith might have to put it off for a few years.
You know it’s gonna be woke if she’s in it.
Having studied some of the background to this film..i would like to take back comments i said..yes they were black soldiers in England at the time and the battle of Bamber Bridge did happen...so while i loathe the tendency to ram the diversity issue into tv or film output..i think this is quite an innovative storyline..
@Guyver Francis good point, never thought of that..
And the chances that three kids whose father was wrongly convicted for espionage would happen upon a rockslide, save a public school runner from a railway tunnel, put out a fire on a canal boat, make friends with a director of the railway, and get their father out of prison in one summer?
@Bessie Hillum 150,000, which was 10% of the US forces in England. So not an entirely unlikely scenario, I wouldn't think.
Who is doing the music It sounds like the guy who did Peter Pan and fantastic beasts
My mates in the trailer
They could have just left it as a charming tale, original to the book & film of many years ago. But no...!..They had to go a "leftie" it up..!!
the original tale was 'leftie'. It just went above your head.
@@Poliss95 Yep. Fabian socialist, in fact. All over the story. Funny how many people here are missing that.
This is a sequel to the 2000 production ? The father returned home. Ido t see s father in the trailer
If you need to explain that, you don't get the bad feedback.
The Underground Railroad Children
Gotta shoehorn that "diversity" and "anti-whiteness" into every single thing.
Oakworth = Wokeworth.
I'm sorry bit this political correctness is ridiculous now. Its running movies and historical accuracy
You do realise they were black American soldiers too don’t you?
@@Newmillsmodelrailway Yeah, like Louis Till
...
The English characters are all white as far as I can tell from this trailer.
One black actor is hardly "anti-whiteness"
The men who cry woke about everything as expected are annoyed they have to see another black person in a movie
Based.
Alors * 0ui, je suis allé voir ailleurs ! Cette histoire & très bien présentée et surtout bien jouée = bravo ! Le pire, car 0ui, c'&1Histoire dramatique qui n'aurait jamais du avoir lieu ! Cause : La grande BETISE HUMAINE. Je ne vois pas de ce qu'il y a d'humain à 0bliger la guerre ! Tt le monde reste à la maison = pas de guerre ! Pas de mort. Bref, quelle catastrophe ces pauvres enfants séparés de leur parent ! Je pense que si s'avait été moi ! Mon Dieu, je n'ose même pas y songer ! Je serais mort de chagrin ! . . . . Merci pour ce film et merci pour m'être rendu compte que moi, je n'ai pas eu à subir cela . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .
Da Wailway Childrun witurns !
The original Railway Children is an all time classic movie and was my late dad’s favourites film.
What I can’t understand is why anyone would think remaking such a classic film was a good idea
Give me the original any day of the week over this rubbish.
Except it’s not a remake. It even features Jenny Agutter from the original, now grown up.
@@8964TS still never going to be as good as the original no matter who is in it
It's not a remake. It's a sequel.
@@8964TS the tv remake already featured her.
@@marty8535 how does one write a sequel when one has been dead for almost 100 years?
Is that Tom Courtney? Can it be?
Bernard cribbins couldnt bear this monstrosity. R.i.p.
Burn down the theatres
Lynch the cast
The new version of Thomas and friends
Ahhh they managed to woke it.
did you really expect anything else?
More like managed to fuck it
‘Waaaawaaa!!!! Black historically accurate stories!!!’ - you.
Get a job and stop crying about movies.
Subversion, propaganda and horrible social engineering. I hope it tanks. Shame on you. Let me guess which early life sections I need to check of the StudioCanal executive producers, CEOs and shareholders; right? I wonder what the names will indicate.
Let me guess. You had no idea that Edith Nesbit was a socialist did you?
@@Poliss95 What does that have to do with creating this globalist tripe.
42 seconds to ruin a classic.
When you make systematic racism a plot point... I’ll pass
🎣
Well I mean it was there.
Here the black kid✊🏾❤️
Africans have no culture or history of your own so you just write yourselves into other peoples sad
You people where not even in the UK in the 40s 🤦♂️😂
@@anonymousinternethardman1265 who’s you people? Black people? I smell a racistttttt😏
But there were no africans in remote parts of England at this time. Its is historicly incorrect. What are we teaching English children? LIES, LIES AND MORE LIES. Give me the origional film. FACTS, ITS ALL ABOUT FACTS.
No blacks Africns in ENGLND at this time in English history. Fact!