This what I said to another person if you still need some aid. 1.For your first argument angle M3 is equivalent to angle S. The reason to this is because SM =SR ; this therefore makes the triangle MSR equilateral; meaning that all angles of said triangle equal therefore angle M3 is 60 degrees. Another note is that the diagram may not be drawn to scale and this means that we can’t assume that angle S is an obtuse angle; even though at first glance and even measurement it implies to be so. Furthermore with MSR being an equilateral triangle this means that SR = MR = MS. 2. Triangle PQM does add up to 180 and here’s why. Given the fact that we now know that M3 is 60 degrees, the overall angle of M must add up to 180(
Since the diagram says RM = SR and the information says SM = SR, couldnt you find all the values with the knowledge that RM = SR = SM, therefore making MRS equilateral?
@@prinx3_x743but still angle S cannot be (90-x) #impossible. Therefore 2x and 90-x are not equal. In mathematics there will never be contradiction. Therefore SM=SR not what is shown on the diagram.
@@tentenprintworks8157 What is shown on the diagram is correct. They made a mistake in the instructions. X was found to be 30. 2(30) = 60 and 90 - 30= 60 It makes sense And if you try to add them up you get 180 degrees for each triangle and 360 degrees for the whole thing. I just checked now :))
I don't think your answer is correct. Angle Q and angle S are the same reason opp angls of a paralelogram. But on your final answer you find them different 30 degree and 60 degress. And that Angle S can never be smaller than 90 degrees reason, bigger Angle of parallelogram. Please redo this, we trust is a human error from given information and you somehow missed it. Thank you.
First of all angle M3 is not equivalent to angle S. FOR THE FACT THAT M3 IS "ACUTE ANGLE" & angle S is an obtuse angle!!! Therefore you should have followed the statement not the diagram(MR=SR) No!!! Angle S is 2x not (90-x). According to mathematical analysis. Math cannot contradict!!!
I saw that the value of x you got 30° which is not making sense at all because if x being that value, triangle PQM will add up to 150° not 180° and that's wrong! Every triangle MUST add up to 180° not something else.
1.For your first argument angle M3 is equivalent to angle S. The reason to this is because SM =SR ; this therefore makes the triangle MSR equilateral; meaning that all angles of said triangle equal therefore angle M3 is 60 degrees. Another note is that the diagram may not be drawn to scale and this means that we can’t assume that angle S is an obtuse angle; even though at first glance and even measurement it implies to be so. Furthermore with MSR being an equilateral triangle this means that SR = MR = MS. 2. Triangle PQM does add up to 180 and here’s why. Given the fact that we now know that M3 is 60 degrees, the overall angle of M must add up to 180(
Can't you use angles on a str line because in 6.2 angle m1+m2+m3= 180
Therefore making x+90+x=180
2x+90=180
2x=90
X=45
idk cause if you use m1+m2
x=90 subing it with x with your eq 2(90)-180(str line) =90 maybe my brain is broken idk
x is not 45. for m3 you didn't include (90-x) you just wrote x!
This what I said to another person if you still need some aid.
1.For your first argument angle M3 is equivalent to angle S. The reason to this is because SM =SR ; this therefore
makes the triangle MSR equilateral; meaning that all angles of said triangle equal therefore angle M3 is 60 degrees. Another note is that the diagram may not be drawn to scale and this means that we can’t assume that angle S is an obtuse angle; even though at first glance and even measurement it implies to be so.
Furthermore with MSR being an equilateral triangle this means that SR = MR = MS.
2. Triangle PQM does add up to 180 and here’s why. Given the fact that we now know that M3 is 60 degrees, the overall angle of M must add up to 180(
@@momakkjj9502 i know u wrote this a long time ago but Thank u sooo much i really appreciate it coz i now understand it better it makes sense 🤞💙🙏
20 minutes before my exam🙏🙏
Ayo I'm writing that tmmr gimme the memo 💀
HAHAH SAMEE😭😭@@mmirzv4485
Same
it's never too late 🙏🏾
i found 90-x by adding the x we found on M1 and the given for M2 then subtracting both from 180 because of angles on a straight line
Since the diagram says RM = SR and the information says SM = SR, couldnt you find all the values with the knowledge that RM = SR = SM, therefore making MRS equilateral?
Weeeeeeee
i think the question made a mistake by sayying SM = SR
@@prinx3_x743but still angle S cannot be (90-x) #impossible.
Therefore 2x and 90-x are not equal. In mathematics there will never be contradiction. Therefore SM=SR not what is shown on the diagram.
@@tentenprintworks8157 What is shown on the diagram is correct. They made a mistake in the instructions. X was found to be 30. 2(30) = 60 and 90 - 30= 60
It makes sense
And if you try to add them up you get 180 degrees for each triangle and 360 degrees for the whole thing. I just checked now :))
Thank you so much u help me so much❤
For Question 6.1 could you also say that M3|Alternate
nah bra
Yes
@@momakkjj9502 wena ke tlo gata di exam di fedile
Is angle s equal to x because of opposite angles of a quad are equal ?
I don't think your answer is correct. Angle Q and angle S are the same reason opp angls of a paralelogram. But on your final answer you find them different 30 degree and 60 degress. And that Angle S can never be smaller than 90 degrees reason, bigger Angle of parallelogram. Please redo this, we trust is a human error from given information and you somehow missed it. Thank you.
Maths Is solved in different ways ❤
X=30
So in terms of S=90-x
90-30=60
And in terms of Q= x+x
30+30=60
Which means Q=S
Hope this helps....God bless
Is it still a parallelogram if the opposite pairs of it aren't equal, because those are the properties of a parallelogram?
only 1 pair has to be parrallel
@@MILK_RL45 no!
Two pairs of opposite sides are parallel and equal. And opposite angles as well has to be equivalent.
@@tentenprintworks8157 He could have just used angles on a straight line😮
Thank you so much sir
Thank you sir
Couldn't you just use angles on line to calculate M3
I don't think the answer is right because on the top it says SM=SR and the line is on MR which means it's wrong
How is SM=SR ?
First of all angle M3 is not equivalent to angle S. FOR THE FACT THAT M3 IS "ACUTE ANGLE" & angle S is an obtuse angle!!!
Therefore you should have followed the statement not the diagram(MR=SR) No!!! Angle S is 2x not (90-x). According to mathematical analysis. Math cannot contradict!!!
I saw that the value of x you got 30° which is not making sense at all because if x being that value, triangle PQM will add up to 150° not 180° and that's wrong!
Every triangle MUST add up to 180° not something else.
1.For your first argument angle M3 is equivalent to angle S. The reason to this is because SM =SR ; this therefore
makes the triangle MSR equilateral; meaning that all angles of said triangle equal therefore angle M3 is 60 degrees. Another note is that the diagram may not be drawn to scale and this means that we can’t assume that angle S is an obtuse angle; even though at first glance and even measurement it implies to be so.
Furthermore with MSR being an equilateral triangle this means that SR = MR = MS.
2. Triangle PQM does add up to 180 and here’s why. Given the fact that we now know that M3 is 60 degrees, the overall angle of M must add up to 180(