As an infp woman, I can recognize this possibility as probably true. I am very idealistic about love, marriage and commitment but as well I am cynical because I reject most of the men that I meet. I cannot see myself being the wife that I know that I can be to that particular person,I cannot see myself being as wife should be. I don't have trust that they will be as equally mindful of the concerns I have for my family and household. I don't meet many selfless, or rather unselfish men.
I was getting so frustrated before you got to your 3rd option (thank god you said it), I havent listened past your 3rd option yet (nor have I read the taming of the shrew for that matter xD) but after hearing your introduction of it I thought of my sp girlfriend... and because this is something I've personally experienced in a way, im sensing shakespeare had in mind a sort of fear of a woman not "submitting" when he wrote it. I dont feel this grandiosly with my girlfriend and shes probably unmatched to the exaggeration of the shrew, it's very weird, and seems like maybe it could be a male nf issue but: In my eyes (and maybe in the eyes of other infps, maybe even in shakespeare's) ideal love requires an equal submission, in which both submit to each other honestly, neither believing him/herself to be above the other. I wouldnt even call what im attempting to describe as "submission" actually, thats how pure I think it is. And in the case of this play, we are shown the shrew, a tough independent woman (from the sound of it), perhaps giving the male a certain mixture of envy, fear, and shame as she topples him in power. This is just what comes to mind, I still need to actually read it ofcourse xD. Basically from a minor feeling of being "threatened" by my girlfriend's awesomeness, I could imagine that this play would be an exaggeration of the feeling.
Oh ^ I was getting frustrated because I believed the first two options just couldnt be right, even though I havent read it..I would have been crushed if either of them were right
Just to clarify my jumbled mess, I'm just hypothesizing that maybe shakespeare's motivation for writing this play was the idea, "you're too great for me (more outspoken,smarter, etc..), get down to my level". I feel it needs to be said that i'm more in awe of my girlfriend's talents as an sp than envious or anything, but I'm hypothesizing that if shakespeare did write it based on this idea, then I can see it being hyperbolic
fantastic lecture! Thanks so much for the fresh intrepretation.
Great video!!
"tell that bitch to chill" I like that lol
As an infp woman, I can recognize this possibility as probably true. I am very idealistic about love, marriage and commitment but as well I am cynical because I reject most of the men that I meet. I cannot see myself being the wife that I know that I can be to that particular person,I cannot see myself being as wife should be. I don't have trust that they will be as equally mindful of the concerns I have for my family and household. I don't meet many selfless, or rather unselfish men.
I was getting so frustrated before you got to your 3rd option (thank god you said it), I havent listened past your 3rd option yet (nor have I read the taming of the shrew for that matter xD) but after hearing your introduction of it I thought of my sp girlfriend... and because this is something I've personally experienced in a way, im sensing shakespeare had in mind a sort of fear of a woman not "submitting" when he wrote it. I dont feel this grandiosly with my girlfriend and shes probably unmatched to the exaggeration of the shrew, it's very weird, and seems like maybe it could be a male nf issue but: In my eyes (and maybe in the eyes of other infps, maybe even in shakespeare's) ideal love requires an equal submission, in which both submit to each other honestly, neither believing him/herself to be above the other. I wouldnt even call what im attempting to describe as "submission" actually, thats how pure I think it is. And in the case of this play, we are shown the shrew, a tough independent woman (from the sound of it), perhaps giving the male a certain mixture of envy, fear, and shame as she topples him in power. This is just what comes to mind, I still need to actually read it ofcourse xD. Basically from a minor feeling of being "threatened" by my girlfriend's awesomeness, I could imagine that this play would be an exaggeration of the feeling.
Oh ^ I was getting frustrated because I believed the first two options just couldnt be right, even though I havent read it..I would have been crushed if either of them were right
Just to clarify my jumbled mess, I'm just hypothesizing that maybe shakespeare's motivation for writing this play was the idea, "you're too great for me (more outspoken,smarter, etc..), get down to my level". I feel it needs to be said that i'm more in awe of my girlfriend's talents as an sp than envious or anything, but I'm hypothesizing that if shakespeare did write it based on this idea, then I can see it being hyperbolic
I can not see. Mover help me to see. I comment