Life Story Of World Leading Autism Researcher | The Human Podcast Ep 32 (Prof Simon Baron-Cohen)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 25 июл 2024
  • Simon Baron-Cohen is a professor of psychology and psychiatry at the University of Cambridge. He is the director of the Autism Research Centre (ARC) and one of world's leading autism researchers.
    AUDIO:
    Spotify - open.spotify.com/episode/1iox...
    Apple Podcasts - podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
    GUEST:
    Simon's 𝕏: / sbaroncohen
    Simon's Wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_B...
    Simon's Books: tinyurl.com/simonbaroncohenbooks
    Simon's Uni of Cambridge Page: www.psychol.cam.ac.uk/people/...
    Autism Research Centre (ARC): www.autismcentreofexcellence.org
    TIMESTAMPS:
    0:00 - Intro
    0:07 - Early Experience Learning About Holocaust
    4:56 - Simon's Parents Careers
    6:05 - Simon's Sister's Condition
    7:41 - Influence of Uta Frith
    10:32 - Working at an Autistic School
    14:01 - What is Autism?
    17:08 - Disorder, Difference, Disability & Disease
    22:45 - Public's Understanding of Autism
    25:12 - Most Influential Autism Research
    29:20 - Changing My Mind On Autism
    32:07 - Systemising & Autism
    35:14 - Career Highlights
    42:15 - Motivation to Spend 40 Years on Autism
    44:15 - Controversy Around Spectrum 10K Study
    51:02 - Effect of Research on Personal Life
    53:51 - What Is A Good Life?
    SOCIAL:
    𝕏 - / heyhumanpodcast
    TikTok - / thehumanpodcasttiktok
    Instagram - / thehumanpodcastinsta
    RECORDING/EDITING EQUIPMENT:
    Provided By Kintek, Who Provide Outstanding Technology Services To Organisations.
    Learn More: kintek.co.uk/
    Music from #Uppbeat (free for Creators!): uppbeat.io/t/hartzmann/space-...
    License code:THHDNXMTRJZWMJPV
    GUEST SUGGESTIONS / FEEDBACK:
    Get in touch with me: heythehumanpodcast@gmail.com

Комментарии • 26

  • @TheHumanPodcast.
    @TheHumanPodcast.  2 месяца назад +6

    HOPE YOU ENJOY 😄 TIMESTAMPS:
    0:07 - Early Experience Learning About Holocaust
    4:56 - Simon's Parents Careers
    6:05 - Simon's Sister's Condition
    7:41 - Influence of Uta Frith
    10:32 - Working at an Autistic School
    14:01 - What is Autism?
    17:08 - Disorder, Difference, Disability & Disease
    22:45 - Public's Understanding of Autism
    25:12 - Most Influential Autism Research
    29:20 - Changing My Mind On Autism
    32:07 - Systemising & Autism
    35:14 - Career Highlights
    42:15 - Motivation to Spend 40 Years on Autism
    44:15 - Controversy Around Spectrum 10K Study
    51:02 - Effect of Research on Personal Life
    53:51 - What Is A Good Life?

  • @rosmurray1952
    @rosmurray1952 2 месяца назад +4

    Thank you for this totally absorbing and fascinating conversation. What an inspiring gentleman Prof. Baron Cohen is and your questions delved deeply and incisively into so many thought provoking pathways. Fantastic convo!

    • @kalyasaify
      @kalyasaify Месяц назад

      better listen to autistic ppl. he's full of himself and simply not smart enough to understand the brilliance of an autistic body

    • @TheHumanPodcast.
      @TheHumanPodcast.  25 дней назад +1

      Thanks Ros. Glad that you enjoyed the episode!

  • @WendyMyers-rk4jx
    @WendyMyers-rk4jx Месяц назад +4

    Thank you for this!
    Thank you Simon Baron Cohen ❤

  • @glennadams6647
    @glennadams6647 2 месяца назад +4

    Absorbingly good. Hybridization of plants studys indicate traits are scrambled and shared and that specific traits that give advantage prevail. The patterns indicate similar explanation of diversity which inturn indicates to me that Autism is a result of human land race hybridization but what do I know.

    • @peteracton2246
      @peteracton2246 2 месяца назад +3

      I my humble opinion these are very old mutations. They may be older than humanity. They occur at very similar levels in all human populations. The Gulf States have slightly higher levels which I put down to better detection and France has the lowest which I put down to a belief in exterior causes (mother/child relationship) there.

    • @hermetrix7035
      @hermetrix7035 18 дней назад

      @@peteracton2246 My thought is that it's a complex neotenous condition. I think children simply have a smaller array of instincts than adults; though children could be seen as being more reliant on instinct-prompts for intuitive development, adults are expected in a social species to have greater social responsibilities with age, which requires a large variety of instinct-prompts to develop. Picture 2 bowls filled with charades prompts, and imagine an autistic person as having the same number of prompts in their bowl with less variety; this causes the autistic person to better develop skillsets regarding certain roles, whereas the neurotypical develops skillsets in a variety of roles. After the same amount of time playing these roles, the autistic person will have had more time to develop skills regarding the roles shared between their bowls, but the neurotypical has had more time to develop skills in a greater variety of roles. If the two are similarly skilled regarding intuition, the autistic individual is likely to be more skilled at the roles they share with the neurotypical, yet they will struggle to perform at roles they've never had in their bowl without being able to connect it to something they know very well. This illustrates the reason that autism is not an inherent advantage: in order for an autistic person to properly adjust to society, they must make the proper intuitive connections between what they're familiar with and what challenges them. This is something everyone has to do at some point with something, but autistics have this problem to an intense degree.
      It's also worth considering the other players in the game of charades: the audience. Both the autistic and neurotypical, regardless of everything previously stated, must learn how well they're acting their roles from the audience's judgment. The audience in this metaphor stands for the entire world in reality, as both the autistic and neurotypical are capable of learning from results of any type of test, scientific or social; a key difference, however, is that in the autistics' juvenilized minds, they tend to put less emphasis on the value of others' opinions than the neurotypical would; this allows greater willingness for innovation (essentially, threading together intuitive discoveries in a unique way).
      I think it's possible that autism is an induced neotenization rather than an old mutation, given not all autistic individuals have an observably autistic family history. I couldn't suggest a proper mechanism, but given this is not the only way or the only time that neoteny has been observed to be an evolutionary advantage, it may be possible that such a biological mechanism is in place that expresses itself when a given species reaches a high level of adaptability within their environment. The environmental function of such a mechanism would be to (1) create imbalance in the given species' dominance over the environment while testing its ability to support future generations, (2) create breathing room for other species and environmental processes under the dominant species (avoiding potential overconsumption of resources), and (3) diversify the interactions of the dominant species with its environment; such a mechanism would actually be crucial in allowing the species dominant over its environment to continue to diversify and improve the odds that any of their offspring may potentially deal with adverse changes to their environment, such as the introduction of a predator or an environmental catastrophe.
      One biological marker as a bit of trivia is that autistic individuals appear to be taller than their neurotypical siblings. Neoteny is a slowing of developmental processes (both physical and mental), meaning that it's possible that both the start and end points for certain growth periods are delayed, with later developments being delayed more than earlier developments. I think that this reflects the psychological aspect just as well, given autistics with delayed linguistic development will often later develop sophisticated linguistic skills.

  • @j.b.4340
    @j.b.4340 17 дней назад +1

    Very interesting. I appreciate, and have benefited from, his work.

    • @TheHumanPodcast.
      @TheHumanPodcast.  17 дней назад

      Thanks for your comment. So glad that you enjoyed the episode :) Do share how you've benefitted from his work, I'm intrigued. Of course though, only if you're comfortable sharing. If you'd like to be notified of future episodes please consider hitting Subscribe :) Thanks, Joe

  • @peteracton2246
    @peteracton2246 2 месяца назад +7

    Imho, and as an autistic person, I find that Simon is spot on around autism. I am alarmed when some of the work at Cambridge is closed down (I'm thinking around genetics, suicidal tendencies) following protests. We need more research and understanding. Simon created the AQ test which produces two bell curves with very little overlap. To me this is good science and justifies me feeling that my life experience is different from most. Thanks both for a very interesting discussion.

    • @TheHumanPodcast.
      @TheHumanPodcast.  25 дней назад +1

      Thanks for your comment Peter, I hope you enjoyed the episode!

  • @OrafuDa
    @OrafuDa 7 дней назад +1

    33:30 As someone who probably has autism (waiting for diagnosis), I can say that I have tried, since my early teens, to consciously systematize my understanding of other people (after my mother told me that I am not very good at tact and such things). And it can go pretty deep and work reasonably well: picking up hints about their motivations and thoughts, and applying that to understand what they say and their behavior, even reading between the lines.
    But it is still different from what neurotypical people do. They seem to “tune in” to each other. For me it is still hard work. And I miss things especially in the moment, and it takes me a bit longer too. The experience to be with other people is far less visceral to me, especially for things like humor, in-group vs out-group behavior and so on. It is mostly exhausting for me.
    I like to compare it to someone who is dyslexic: they can learn how to recognize characters and words, and learn to read, by applying all sorts of tricks and a lot of extra practice. But it is still hard work for them, and it is not entirely as fluent as for people who are not dyslexic.
    Systematizing also means that I am thinking a lot beforehand about a lot of the reactions that I would have when someone said something specific to me, or asked me a variety of questions. In the moment it might take far too long for me to understand what the question really means and what I would think about it. I would also have to consider so many things that I have stored in my head and that are part of me, that it would take quite a while.
    Edit:
    The best way for me to exist in a social situation is to be “also there”. At family gatherings, for example. I can talk about what happened in my life, and ask the others about their things. And then I can just withdraw and talk to someone else. As long as it is just a chat about what happened, it works just fine. I don’t have to try to detect their thoughts, motivations and intentions. And I can even just sit back and listen to the others talk. Those are the most wonderful social situations for me.
    On the other hand, for example a date with a romantic interest is super exhausting. I have to detect all kinds of intentions, and read all the signs correctly … and half way through the night I am having an internalized meltdown because I am overwhelmed. Nope, by the end I won’t come in for a coffee, I just want to go home and sleep for a whole day.
    Oh, and the other kind of social situation that works well for me is with neurodivergent people. It is easier for me to detect their thoughts, because they think more similarly to me. And they also make it more obvious: they are usually very direct, and they overshare. And they like to talk about their special interests or what they would like to do. So, I don’t have to constantly analyze everything.

    • @TheHumanPodcast.
      @TheHumanPodcast.  3 дня назад

      Thanks so much for your comment. It was fascinating to read about your experiences, and I appreciate you sharing these. Did you find the episode interesting? Would love to hear about more thoughts. Thanks again, Joe.

  • @Andyman66
    @Andyman66 2 месяца назад +5

    What a truly remarkable human being.
    I particularly like his answer to the final question. This is an ethos that everyone should strive to live by. 👏👏

    • @kalyasaify
      @kalyasaify Месяц назад

      nah he doesn't understand anything

    • @TheHumanPodcast.
      @TheHumanPodcast.  25 дней назад +1

      Thanks for your comment Andy. Glad that you enjoyed the episode!

  • @OrafuDa
    @OrafuDa 7 дней назад +1

    51:03 The problem with studies into the genetics of autism is that afterwards the genetics are known to the research community, and in effect to everyone. Even when I am not really worried about Simon Baron-Cohen using this information for eugenics, someone might. Parents, parenthood clinics, governments, all over the world.
    Just as an example, there is a large and important country in the West who will soon have a new president. And one of the two contenders believes that he has the “good genes” … so, conversely, there must be others who have “bad” genes. And the president of that country has recently been empowered with absolute king-like immunity to do whatever he wants, without fear of ever being checked by the law or anyone, as long as what he does looks even vaguely official. That could include sending unwanted people to camps, for example. Or really, *anything* that anyone might think of, as long as it looks like an official act. All they need to do is identify “unwanted” people. A gene test might be quite handy for some such people. And there is a playbook for that, that was written by the Nazis in Nazi-Germany.
    And nope, I do not believe that this is far fetched. This has happened several times already. We just need to see the signs.
    Btw, I would really really welcome more research into the genetics and other causes of autism (as there apparently are some things that are not entirely in the genes), if that could lead to a better understanding of the negative parts of it, like, for example, epilepsy. But we need to balance this against the costs of such research. If and only if there is a 100% safe way to protect this research against abuse, then I would be ok with that. In reality though, I don’t think there is a way to safeguard such work 100% against abuse.

  • @ccryder654
    @ccryder654 2 месяца назад +2

    THEY ALL HAVE THEIR OWN LEVEL!! THETE ARE HIGH FUNCATIONING AND LOW!! I TJINK HE MAKES THINGS MORE COMPLECATIED THEN TO
    IT NEEDS TO BE!! THEIR IS
    ALL LEVELS IN BETWEEN!!!

  • @tezg1508
    @tezg1508 2 месяца назад +3

    I think autism could be childhood in an adult world. And I think the Adults need to wake up.

    • @kalyasaify
      @kalyasaify Месяц назад

      as an autistic I really dislike simon and his psychopathic ill brain. we're geniusses, neurotypicals are too disabled to understand it while psychopaths try to tear us apart. we're the reason why science exists but the majority is just too stupid. this is the reason why autistics don't like talking to them, because it's TIME WASTE. even as a lil kid I was smarter than the adults around me. it's exhausting living with 🧠💀 individuals (aka the majority)

  • @MP15aug
    @MP15aug Месяц назад +2

    I am more interested in what causes autism but he doesn't seem interested in that.

  • @kalyasaify
    @kalyasaify Месяц назад

    simon looks like he likes them young...🫠 I know what I'm talking about... all I get from him is misinformation and a weird piercing feeling in my gut