It has been dead for quite some time - and for whatever reason they cannot seem to stop kicking the Tiberium Sun stuff around like a dead horse. The last time they tried to renew CnC it flopped so hard the game never made it out of beta (Generals 2 iirc).
This is classic EA, It's like when they released the last Sim City and we had to go to Cities Skylines to get the game we wanted, this time we have Tempest Rising to get the Command and Conquer experience we've been craving for years. I loved EA growing up but at this point I don't believe they're redeemable, the C&C IP is just an asset to squeeze dry for them.
@@daemonic9811 I have never heard of Tempest Rising and will definitely check it out. Thanks. In the meantime I am digging Dune: Spice Wars, which reminds me a lot of the good old Westwood times.
@@OehrchenVT How good was Dune 2000, I was a little put off by Dune looking more in the style of Northgard but I intend to try it once it's past early access for sure. There's an open play test for the first mission of Tempest Rising on it's steam page, I heard it's only available until the 28th so I would get on that asap if you want to try it, it's hidden behind a request access button but it was instant for me, it's unashamedly a C&C clone and all the better for it IMO.
@@petercampi2840people like you should stop bringing back the past reputation of a company. EA is EA, they only care about doing business & having big sales in the end. Plus they don’t see the value of niche games like RTS & Racing Games. The past EA is just the same as the current EA.
Ever since they called C&C Rivals a C&C game for the next generation I knew that we were no longer going to be EA's target audience. Of course afterwards we got C&C Remastered but in my opinion they mostly updated the graphics there and that is about it, feeding on people's nostalgia.
C&C Remastered was an exception as companies were in the remastering fever to get money. However they did a good job getting the Westwood people back to work on it and even improving some of the gameplay mechanics. But that wasn't EA, they were just the publisher seeking for money.
@@No_Ghosts Money making. It sells good to the younger generation and in times of digital payment and credit cards you do not feel directly what you are spending.
C&C to me was a cheesy 90s action movie turned into a video game. Unfortunately there's nothing cheesy about this game, just a shallow and cynical attempt to squeeze money out of nostalgia
"C&C was never colorful, was never vibrant..." It's been that way ever since RA2. Even if you want to stick to just the "main" franchise, things were a lot more colorful post Tiberian Sun, and Billy Dee Williams was eating whole chunks out of the scenery in Tiberium Wars.
As a long-time fan of CnC, the last good CnC is TIberium Wars. RA3 is okay-ish (albeit a bit cartoony) but after that, it's all cashgrab and trend-chasing: -Tiberian Twilight (chasing Esport fad against Starcraft) -CnC remaster (chasing remastered fad, which although it's pretty good, it's still just rose-tinted nostalgia glasses of something we already played before) -CnC rivals (mobile game fad with lootbox) and now we have this If you see how the CnC games progressed, it's clear that the peak of it is during Tiberium wars, it has the most serious graphics of all CnC series, it has units with special abilities, unit upgrades, support powers and great storyline. Past that, the game seems to regressed, becoming even simpler for each installments to appeal to lowest common denominator: ->In RA3, EA removed: -ore fields, no longer you can do harvester raid since they won't ever need move out of predesignated ore nodes -All weapons now certainly hit (regardless if it isn't even possible) -Removed unit upgrades (although previous RA series don't feature upgrades, it's clear that it offers richer gameplay since Generals and CnC3 also features it) -Units' special abilities matters even more (basically turning the game's multiplayer into micro-intensive clickfest) ->In Tiberian Twilight, EA removed... everything fundamental about CnC -base building (no option to cripple certain production building) -ore fields (no option for harvester raid or map control, or even worry about money) -power (no option to go after their power plant) -Dumbed down the combined arms tactics (with the crawler-based system, your own strategy is extremely single-minded: if you play defense, you play turtling and restricted to infantry, if you play offense, you basically do deathball tank rush, and if you play support, you basically play as airfield) -With the damage and armor types, the gameplay become super bonkers: in previous games, even a lowly infantryman can kill tanks using mg, but here, your unit could be basically invulnerable against anything without correct weapon type to counter your armor type, but utterly MELT against anything with correct counter (not that I dislike specific weapons countering specific unit, but the difference is so extreme in Twilight that a single high end infantry could take upwards to FIVE minutes killing a basic tank. To illustrate how ridiculous this is, here's an (ridiculous) example: remember the beloved commandos? Yeah, it now takes MINUTES for him to kill a single basic infantry because all infantry armor is "light" which is weak against "gun" type weapons, the commando carries "missile" and "cannon" type weapons, which is ONLY effective against "medium" armor. So yeah, you can have a case of T3 commando taking minutes to kill T1 infantry, who guns him down in seconds because of this nonsense) If you want easy win, build T1 laser units and swarm enemy crawler before going to their spawn point to kill them on respawn. Because of the damage and armor types, they are surprisingly resistant against nearly anything while crawler and the majority of higher tier units are vulnerable against lasers. Plus, these t1 little buggers are insanely fast and replaced faster than they rate they're killed -Unit cap, plus the higher tier units are now locked until you level up your commander (and good luck with that, since the xp is also capped at 4000 no matter how well you play and lategame level can cost upwards to 150000. And no, playing the campaign does not unlock new units as you progress, especially with a pitiful 800 xp PER MISSION. So yes, you WILL play the final mission with basic units). To rub salt on the wound, the unlock is separate, PER FACTION (so for example, if you level up as GDI offense to lv50 and unlock all of it's units, and decided to play as Nod, then guess what, you start at lv1 and have to grind it all over again) -Some features feels needless or simply put just to nonsensically make the game even more micro heavy, like for example manual reload (yes, there's a manual reload, and it's only for gun-based units. There's no such thing for laser, missile or cannon-based units). Or the chance for miss (yes, your units can miss on their shot, but the thing is, it's not based on distance, it's purely based on percentage. So you can have a tank firing at other tank, at point blank range and STILL MISS. You have to research an upgrade to completely eliminate it) -In addition to shoehorn the main storyline that they said 'canon' (I don't), which, because of the Esport-centric gameplay means the story becomes complete nonsense and utterly boring (let's take a comparison shall we? In Tiberium wars, you have MCV escort mission, rally the survivors after scrin invasion and plan a counterattack, steatlh mission to cripple GDI antimissile defense, siege the Temple prime of Sarajevo, operation to eliminate rebellious nod higher-ups, etc. etc. etc. all with the combined arms units, upgrades and support powers. In Twilight, since the ONLY gameplay is primarily revolves around capture points, the WHOLE campaign missions is just that, leading the entire storyline basically concerning about capture points and feels like the rest of the world leaders trying to decide the fate of the entire planet on Esport, literally just feels that Kane Lives to win Esport lol while giving middle finger to all those story build up, lore and other questions from previous games) ->Rivals is basically just [insert any money draining scheme mobile game here] and apply CnC skin on it. Legion is basically just version 2.0 of this, and I might say strayed even further (seriously, the character models and the art direction feels like it came from fucking Overwatch) Sorry for the long rant, but as someone who grew up with with CnC series since the 90s, I still can't forgive what EA has done with the franchise, literally not just butchering it, but pissed on it's grave, twice. I still play older CnC games to this day, the one when it's still have souls and love put on it (mainly Tiberium Wars, RA2 and Generals), just to re-experience that old nostalgia
I believe RA3 can still be considered one of the great CnC games. I don't agree with your criticisms of it. 1. It is true they removed ore fields as they were in previous games, but that didn't remove harvester raiding. Harvesters can still be destroyed to cripple a foe's economy and you can see such plays quite frequently in the competitive scene. 2. "All weapons now certainly hit." Not true. Weapons such as infantry rifles and tank cannons do always hit, but that isn't new to the series. RA3 bombers are essentially useless against smaller, nimbler units like fast vehicles and infantry because they can dodge the bombs with ease. I think the only unit that changed in RA3 were rocket launchers, which do not miss compared to their Tiberium Wars counterparts. 3. Unit upgrades are still a thing in RA3. They just switched them from being research options in tech buildings to being commander abilities. The scope is definitely more limited than in Tiberium Wars but it's still there. 4. Unit abilities are indeed very important, which I'm not a fan of. That being said, I do believe that RA3 was better served distinguishing itself with its more gimmicky gameplay than trying to just be Tiberium Wars with a Cold War coat of paint. At its core, it still is CnC, albeit one that appeals to a slightly different audience. 5. CnC has always been a bit silly. Tiberium Wars was dark and gritty yet still had plenty of dark humor. Red Alert 3 frequently leans into its campiness, and I believe its cartoony artstyle suits that pretty well. Generals was also quite campy, so RA3 wasn't breaking new ground for the series on that front. It still is CnC. I just felt like responding to this cause your observations left me scratching my head a bit. As for Tiberium Twilight, I agree that it was a misguided travesty, and its abominable mobile successors have been little more than EA parading the corpse of the series around. We can only hope that at some point someone picks up the torch that these excellent RTS games left behind.
@@MrAtlantos Fair enough, everyone have their own opinion on their perferred CnC series. Probably because I grew up mostly with Tiberium and Generals series. So, to address some of your statements: 1. What I mean is that the resource nodes are much easier to defend against raids, just throw all-around walls and put turrets around it. Previously on RA2 and TW, the resource fields covers several portions of the map, so the resource collectors have to wander off outside the base to do collection (in other words, their operational range now larger, so the vulnerability of raiding gives another perspective on how you raid or counter enemy raid, especially when they harvest the same field) 2. I agree yes, bombs and slow moving projectiles can still miss. What I mean by that (the one that shouldn't be possible) is some weird case like missiles following Sky wing as it goes underwater, or the fact that many of the support powers can't really be countered and in practice they are eventually granted no matter what without an in-game reason or decision 3. The RA3 unit upgrade is kinda hit and miss in my opinion. Previously on Generals and TW, unit upgrades costs money, are researched from certain tech buildings, and there's some that can only be unlocked using generals power or from certain factions, so there's a layer on decision-making there. I just feel that in RA3, the fact that you got substantial unit upgrade, for several types, instantly for free just by using promotion feels pretty jarring 4. I don't know how to say this, but some unit abilities feels pretty forced, especially on Empire of the Rising Sun, with their transforming shenanigans, since that means depending on what mode the vehicle currently is, it could mean you lack certain vehicles or utterly steamroll the opposition. I don't know, but compared to previous special abilities on Generals and TW (which enhances the role the unit already is), the special abilities in RA3 feels much more of a deciding factor in a fight 5. Compared to it's predecessor, RA2, RA3 does feel much more cartoony. While yes, RA2 looks like B-movie in terms of goofiness, aesthetically speaking, there's still an amount of grittiness on it that's still saying "we're dead serious". Compare RA2 desolator (rad-suit infantry with radiation cannon) with RA3 desolator (robotic suit with fuel hose), and I think you get what I mean Not that saying RA3 is bad or don't have it's own merit, people can have their own preference, but hey that's just my opinion on it on why it didn't click with me
As bad as it is the blow is softened knowing that totem arts is still working on Firestorm, a faithful C&C fps, and just recently released a new update bringing it closer to a final release
Fans are waiting for the Remaked or Remastered of C&C2 EA: "I got you fam!" *releasing another trash pay-to-win mobile game* Have they not learnt their lesson with Rivals
At the end of C&C 4 didn't the tiberium, for lack of a better way to say it, vanish? If so, I wouldn't mind the next mainline game at least starting the next arc(?) more vibrantly and colorfully. A new start of sorts.
We saw that the tiberium went back into the crystal nodes, still usable for power. If I remember correctly the world was still in a broken state as the crystals used the minerals of natural resources to grow. So they could do some aftermath games or with a new threat emerging.
Dieser Dreck hat mit C+C 0 zu tun!! Typisch Asiadreck langweil AUFBAUSPIEL wie 1000 andere !! Ausser für hirlose Idioten die scheisse mögen ,braucht niemand den nächsten bullshit von E farts!! 😡💩
"C&C was never colorful." Me: Looks at Red Alert, which has the Allies in a very noticable blue. Soviets in a very noticable red. And the Japanese in a VERY NOTICABLE orange. Command and Conquer is multiple universes in one name. Now the TIBERIUM universe was never colorful or vibrant. Red Alert, on the other hand? I dont know much of Generals to make a guess on that one
can't belive this game can be worst than rivals. it is paid to win and team pay to win. i try to see how far i can get not paying, the time gate from level 15 on is painful.
I have completely stopped saying anything against this mobile market. First of all, if you are a Company, an independent company at that, you want to make more money than you do right now. So from a simple business perspective any Developer Team, any independent Developer absolutely should use Microstransaction and lootboxes, etc for their own gain. Secondly. Most people don't care anymore. No matter how much you say no matter how much you advice the people to stop falling for the market tricks, they'll never listen. And frankly I wouldn't listen any more either, because sometimes I really just want one of the items in the Micro Store. That said: What the companies in this Video and many other companies are doing is flat out perverse.
Great video couldn’t agree more, this is a disappointing release. Quick question I am curious to know what method you used to get the Witcher clip please?
You were right about everything in this video. Legions is a slap in the face to the C&C community. I thought they were on the right path for remastering the original C&C and Red Alert. But what do we get for waiting on the next C&C? A crappy mobile game with loot boxes.
If they changed the factions and removed Tiberium, then they could have spun it as it's own thing like with Red Alert 2+3 and Generals and it would only be slightly insulting. After they remaster the original and the first RA, I had hope. This brought me back to C&C 4 levels of disappointment.
I didn't have much hope until someone dropped the name Tempest Rising. It looks like a C&C clone but is still very promising if it turns out as good as the demo. ruclips.net/video/nqCnlWFshrY/видео.html
@@OehrchenVT It seems EA is trying it again just with more weeb and fortnite flavours mixed in. I'm surprised they even released this in the West because this screams made for the Chinese mobile market.
I gave it a chance and got a little hooked. I'm actually embarrassed that I spent the price of a AAA game on this, with no end in sight. The cash shop is disgusting.
I tried it for three days. The chat is full of idiots and the game is an absolute insult to the C&C games and the people that enjoy them. I deleted my account.
Do you think the Command & Conquer series is just dead?
Yes, it died decades ago.
It has been dead for quite some time - and for whatever reason they cannot seem to stop kicking the Tiberium Sun stuff around like a dead horse. The last time they tried to renew CnC it flopped so hard the game never made it out of beta (Generals 2 iirc).
This is classic EA, It's like when they released the last Sim City and we had to go to Cities Skylines to get the game we wanted, this time we have Tempest Rising to get the Command and Conquer experience we've been craving for years.
I loved EA growing up but at this point I don't believe they're redeemable, the C&C IP is just an asset to squeeze dry for them.
@@daemonic9811 I have never heard of Tempest Rising and will definitely check it out. Thanks.
In the meantime I am digging Dune: Spice Wars, which reminds me a lot of the good old Westwood times.
@@OehrchenVT How good was Dune 2000, I was a little put off by Dune looking more in the style of Northgard but I intend to try it once it's past early access for sure.
There's an open play test for the first mission of Tempest Rising on it's steam page, I heard it's only available until the 28th so I would get on that asap if you want to try it, it's hidden behind a request access button but it was instant for me, it's unashamedly a C&C clone and all the better for it IMO.
Looks like C&C Rivals with heroes in the field instead of having base commanders. How creative of EA. Sigh.
Ooof. I totally forgot about C&C Rivals. It probably brought them money so they're just trying it again.
EA never cared for C&C it was always a make money company. never about a passion for their product or the fans of said product.😔
True
Not quite, there was a time, the 1980s, when EA was a good company, but that time ended when the founder, Tripp Hawkins, left to found 3DO.
@@petercampi2840people like you should stop bringing back the past reputation of a company.
EA is EA, they only care about doing business & having big sales in the end. Plus they don’t see the value of niche games like RTS & Racing Games.
The past EA is just the same as the current EA.
Ever since they called C&C Rivals a C&C game for the next generation I knew that we were no longer going to be EA's target audience.
Of course afterwards we got C&C Remastered but in my opinion they mostly updated the graphics there and that is about it, feeding on people's nostalgia.
C&C Remastered was an exception as companies were in the remastering fever to get money. However they did a good job getting the Westwood people back to work on it and even improving some of the gameplay mechanics. But that wasn't EA, they were just the publisher seeking for money.
Atleast they didnt randomly make the remaster worse than the old version, like they did to warcraft3 reforged.
Oh and let's not forget in a verry rare ID like move. They released the source code to the first two games.
I mean EA must care a little bit.
why does "for the next generation" always mean "for people who like cartoonish Fortnite style characters"
@@No_Ghosts Money making. It sells good to the younger generation and in times of digital payment and credit cards you do not feel directly what you are spending.
I cannot eat as much as I’d like to vomit 🤢
C&C to me was a cheesy 90s action movie turned into a video game. Unfortunately there's nothing cheesy about this game, just a shallow and cynical attempt to squeeze money out of nostalgia
"C&C was never colorful, was never vibrant..."
It's been that way ever since RA2. Even if you want to stick to just the "main" franchise, things were a lot more colorful post Tiberian Sun, and Billy Dee Williams was eating whole chunks out of the scenery in Tiberium Wars.
As a long-time fan of CnC, the last good CnC is TIberium Wars. RA3 is okay-ish (albeit a bit cartoony) but after that, it's all cashgrab and trend-chasing:
-Tiberian Twilight (chasing Esport fad against Starcraft)
-CnC remaster (chasing remastered fad, which although it's pretty good, it's still just rose-tinted nostalgia glasses of something we already played before)
-CnC rivals (mobile game fad with lootbox)
and now we have this
If you see how the CnC games progressed, it's clear that the peak of it is during Tiberium wars, it has the most serious graphics of all CnC series, it has units with special abilities, unit upgrades, support powers and great storyline. Past that, the game seems to regressed, becoming even simpler for each installments to appeal to lowest common denominator:
->In RA3, EA removed:
-ore fields, no longer you can do harvester raid since they won't ever need move out of predesignated ore nodes
-All weapons now certainly hit (regardless if it isn't even possible)
-Removed unit upgrades (although previous RA series don't feature upgrades, it's clear that it offers richer gameplay since Generals and CnC3 also features it)
-Units' special abilities matters even more (basically turning the game's multiplayer into micro-intensive clickfest)
->In Tiberian Twilight, EA removed... everything fundamental about CnC
-base building (no option to cripple certain production building)
-ore fields (no option for harvester raid or map control, or even worry about money)
-power (no option to go after their power plant)
-Dumbed down the combined arms tactics (with the crawler-based system, your own strategy is extremely single-minded: if you play defense, you play turtling and restricted to infantry, if you play offense, you basically do deathball tank rush, and if you play support, you basically play as airfield)
-With the damage and armor types, the gameplay become super bonkers: in previous games, even a lowly infantryman can kill tanks using mg, but here, your unit could be basically invulnerable against anything without correct weapon type to counter your armor type, but utterly MELT against anything with correct counter (not that I dislike specific weapons countering specific unit, but the difference is so extreme in Twilight that a single high end infantry could take upwards to FIVE minutes killing a basic tank. To illustrate how ridiculous this is, here's an (ridiculous) example: remember the beloved commandos? Yeah, it now takes MINUTES for him to kill a single basic infantry because all infantry armor is "light" which is weak against "gun" type weapons, the commando carries "missile" and "cannon" type weapons, which is ONLY effective against "medium" armor. So yeah, you can have a case of T3 commando taking minutes to kill T1 infantry, who guns him down in seconds because of this nonsense) If you want easy win, build T1 laser units and swarm enemy crawler before going to their spawn point to kill them on respawn. Because of the damage and armor types, they are surprisingly resistant against nearly anything while crawler and the majority of higher tier units are vulnerable against lasers. Plus, these t1 little buggers are insanely fast and replaced faster than they rate they're killed
-Unit cap, plus the higher tier units are now locked until you level up your commander (and good luck with that, since the xp is also capped at 4000 no matter how well you play and lategame level can cost upwards to 150000. And no, playing the campaign does not unlock new units as you progress, especially with a pitiful 800 xp PER MISSION. So yes, you WILL play the final mission with basic units). To rub salt on the wound, the unlock is separate, PER FACTION (so for example, if you level up as GDI offense to lv50 and unlock all of it's units, and decided to play as Nod, then guess what, you start at lv1 and have to grind it all over again)
-Some features feels needless or simply put just to nonsensically make the game even more micro heavy, like for example manual reload (yes, there's a manual reload, and it's only for gun-based units. There's no such thing for laser, missile or cannon-based units). Or the chance for miss (yes, your units can miss on their shot, but the thing is, it's not based on distance, it's purely based on percentage. So you can have a tank firing at other tank, at point blank range and STILL MISS. You have to research an upgrade to completely eliminate it)
-In addition to shoehorn the main storyline that they said 'canon' (I don't), which, because of the Esport-centric gameplay means the story becomes complete nonsense and utterly boring (let's take a comparison shall we? In Tiberium wars, you have MCV escort mission, rally the survivors after scrin invasion and plan a counterattack, steatlh mission to cripple GDI antimissile defense, siege the Temple prime of Sarajevo, operation to eliminate rebellious nod higher-ups, etc. etc. etc. all with the combined arms units, upgrades and support powers. In Twilight, since the ONLY gameplay is primarily revolves around capture points, the WHOLE campaign missions is just that, leading the entire storyline basically concerning about capture points and feels like the rest of the world leaders trying to decide the fate of the entire planet on Esport, literally just feels that Kane Lives to win Esport lol while giving middle finger to all those story build up, lore and other questions from previous games)
->Rivals is basically just [insert any money draining scheme mobile game here] and apply CnC skin on it. Legion is basically just version 2.0 of this, and I might say strayed even further (seriously, the character models and the art direction feels like it came from fucking Overwatch)
Sorry for the long rant, but as someone who grew up with with CnC series since the 90s, I still can't forgive what EA has done with the franchise, literally not just butchering it, but pissed on it's grave, twice. I still play older CnC games to this day, the one when it's still have souls and love put on it (mainly Tiberium Wars, RA2 and Generals), just to re-experience that old nostalgia
I believe RA3 can still be considered one of the great CnC games. I don't agree with your criticisms of it.
1. It is true they removed ore fields as they were in previous games, but that didn't remove harvester raiding. Harvesters can still be destroyed to cripple a foe's economy and you can see such plays quite frequently in the competitive scene.
2. "All weapons now certainly hit." Not true. Weapons such as infantry rifles and tank cannons do always hit, but that isn't new to the series. RA3 bombers are essentially useless against smaller, nimbler units like fast vehicles and infantry because they can dodge the bombs with ease. I think the only unit that changed in RA3 were rocket launchers, which do not miss compared to their Tiberium Wars counterparts.
3. Unit upgrades are still a thing in RA3. They just switched them from being research options in tech buildings to being commander abilities. The scope is definitely more limited than in Tiberium Wars but it's still there.
4. Unit abilities are indeed very important, which I'm not a fan of. That being said, I do believe that RA3 was better served distinguishing itself with its more gimmicky gameplay than trying to just be Tiberium Wars with a Cold War coat of paint. At its core, it still is CnC, albeit one that appeals to a slightly different audience.
5. CnC has always been a bit silly. Tiberium Wars was dark and gritty yet still had plenty of dark humor. Red Alert 3 frequently leans into its campiness, and I believe its cartoony artstyle suits that pretty well. Generals was also quite campy, so RA3 wasn't breaking new ground for the series on that front. It still is CnC.
I just felt like responding to this cause your observations left me scratching my head a bit. As for Tiberium Twilight, I agree that it was a misguided travesty, and its abominable mobile successors have been little more than EA parading the corpse of the series around. We can only hope that at some point someone picks up the torch that these excellent RTS games left behind.
@@MrAtlantos
Fair enough, everyone have their own opinion on their perferred CnC series. Probably because I grew up mostly with Tiberium and Generals series. So, to address some of your statements:
1. What I mean is that the resource nodes are much easier to defend against raids, just throw all-around walls and put turrets around it. Previously on RA2 and TW, the resource fields covers several portions of the map, so the resource collectors have to wander off outside the base to do collection (in other words, their operational range now larger, so the vulnerability of raiding gives another perspective on how you raid or counter enemy raid, especially when they harvest the same field)
2. I agree yes, bombs and slow moving projectiles can still miss. What I mean by that (the one that shouldn't be possible) is some weird case like missiles following Sky wing as it goes underwater, or the fact that many of the support powers can't really be countered and in practice they are eventually granted no matter what without an in-game reason or decision
3. The RA3 unit upgrade is kinda hit and miss in my opinion. Previously on Generals and TW, unit upgrades costs money, are researched from certain tech buildings, and there's some that can only be unlocked using generals power or from certain factions, so there's a layer on decision-making there. I just feel that in RA3, the fact that you got substantial unit upgrade, for several types, instantly for free just by using promotion feels pretty jarring
4. I don't know how to say this, but some unit abilities feels pretty forced, especially on Empire of the Rising Sun, with their transforming shenanigans, since that means depending on what mode the vehicle currently is, it could mean you lack certain vehicles or utterly steamroll the opposition. I don't know, but compared to previous special abilities on Generals and TW (which enhances the role the unit already is), the special abilities in RA3 feels much more of a deciding factor in a fight
5. Compared to it's predecessor, RA2, RA3 does feel much more cartoony. While yes, RA2 looks like B-movie in terms of goofiness, aesthetically speaking, there's still an amount of grittiness on it that's still saying "we're dead serious". Compare RA2 desolator (rad-suit infantry with radiation cannon) with RA3 desolator (robotic suit with fuel hose), and I think you get what I mean
Not that saying RA3 is bad or don't have it's own merit, people can have their own preference, but hey that's just my opinion on it on why it didn't click with me
The remaster got me into playing C&C and falling in love with it, its not JUST nostalgia for old fans, new fans exist too :)
they just dont care, but remember, you cant kill a mesiah
PEACE THROUGH POWER!
C&C lives in death!
As bad as it is the blow is softened knowing that totem arts is still working on Firestorm, a faithful C&C fps, and just recently released a new update bringing it closer to a final release
Fans are waiting for the Remaked or Remastered of C&C2
EA: "I got you fam!" *releasing another trash pay-to-win mobile game*
Have they not learnt their lesson with Rivals
Thanks for dropping in.
tbh I don't think they will ever learn. They probably have it in their company philosophy: Cash.... more cash.
At the end of C&C 4 didn't the tiberium, for lack of a better way to say it, vanish? If so, I wouldn't mind the next mainline game at least starting the next arc(?) more vibrantly and colorfully. A new start of sorts.
We saw that the tiberium went back into the crystal nodes, still usable for power. If I remember correctly the world was still in a broken state as the crystals used the minerals of natural resources to grow. So they could do some aftermath games or with a new threat emerging.
Bears Eat Foxes
Agreed with literally everything
Or foxes eat bears :-P
Gott verdammt, EA! Hört auf mit dieser Leichenfledderei, ihr habt schon genug Schaden angerichtet.
Ist scheinbar günstiger als sich etwas neues auszudenken :(
Dieser Dreck hat mit C+C 0 zu tun!! Typisch Asiadreck langweil AUFBAUSPIEL wie 1000 andere !! Ausser für hirlose Idioten die scheisse mögen ,braucht niemand den nächsten bullshit von E farts!! 😡💩
"C&C was never colorful."
Me: Looks at Red Alert, which has the Allies in a very noticable blue. Soviets in a very noticable red. And the Japanese in a VERY NOTICABLE orange.
Command and Conquer is multiple universes in one name. Now the TIBERIUM universe was never colorful or vibrant. Red Alert, on the other hand? I dont know much of Generals to make a guess on that one
can't belive this game can be worst than rivals. it is paid to win and team pay to win. i try to see how far i can get not paying, the time gate from level 15 on is painful.
Haha good luck. Will be interested to hear how far you get :D
I have completely stopped saying anything against this mobile market.
First of all, if you are a Company, an independent company at that, you want to make more money than you do right now. So from a simple business perspective any Developer Team, any independent Developer absolutely should use Microstransaction and lootboxes, etc for their own gain.
Secondly. Most people don't care anymore. No matter how much you say no matter how much you advice the people to stop falling for the market tricks, they'll never listen. And frankly I wouldn't listen any more either, because sometimes I really just want one of the items in the Micro Store.
That said: What the companies in this Video and many other companies are doing is flat out perverse.
the biggest red flag was EA being involved.
Great video couldn’t agree more, this is a disappointing release. Quick question I am curious to know what method you used to get the Witcher clip please?
You were right about everything in this video. Legions is a slap in the face to the C&C community. I thought they were on the right path for remastering the original C&C and Red Alert. But what do we get for waiting on the next C&C? A crappy mobile game with loot boxes.
My hopes are at the moment in another studio. Playtesting something that actually looks very promising :)
@OehrchenVT Well, I've officially given up. While the C&C remasters brings back old memories, Stormgate has grabbed my attention as of late.
If they changed the factions and removed Tiberium, then they could have spun it as it's own thing like with Red Alert 2+3 and Generals and it would only be slightly insulting.
After they remaster the original and the first RA, I had hope. This brought me back to C&C 4 levels of disappointment.
I didn't have much hope until someone dropped the name Tempest Rising.
It looks like a C&C clone but is still very promising if it turns out as good as the demo.
ruclips.net/video/nqCnlWFshrY/видео.html
Didn't EA already release another crappy mobile CnC game a few years ago?
Yeah..CnC Rivals. And they said this format would be the CnC for the new generation. Yikes.
@@OehrchenVT It seems EA is trying it again just with more weeb and fortnite flavours mixed in. I'm surprised they even released this in the West because this screams made for the Chinese mobile market.
this game makes me want to puke.
or they can also lance it to Totem Arts.
I gave it a chance and got a little hooked. I'm actually embarrassed that I spent the price of a AAA game on this, with no end in sight. The cash shop is disgusting.
Don't need to be embarrassed. They try to get us. Sadly they are trying over and over again.
I tried it for three days. The chat is full of idiots and the game is an absolute insult to the C&C games and the people that enjoy them. I deleted my account.
Yeah it's a bit of a shit, better to do it properly
Nothing less than a spit in the face would be good enough for EA games.
Bitter yea you kind of forgotten about that there was an alien invasion that even worse
Oh yeah true. Totally forgot about the Scrin.
its a bit ironic. i had no idea this game existed until i saw your video. i wish i didnt know it existed but you made a good video.
Thanks :) Sometimes trouble just appears unexpectedly.
Melon Gang
Why is it like 30 GB
Mobile game 💀
RIP
Please somebody Burnett EA Download to the grounds...🙄👏
I normally don't choose violence. I just protest by not buying EA games. :)