I have never understood why cheap car manufacturers can't make cars that look good as Audi's, Range rovers, BMW's, Merc's etc ..? why is it only super expensive cars look great ? looks are not expensive right ? its just looks, so why can't cheap cars look as good as expensive ones ?
Some new bmw and Mercedes don’t look that good imo. Toyota, Kia and Honda have actually made some pretty nice looking cars I think. There’s also the higher performance/prestige of those expensive cars that make it look nicer. Huge brakes, exhausts, wide tires, advanced headlights etc
E-tron Can’t beat a RS6/7 at the end of the day. It isn’t anything to give an RS7 a stage one software remap. At that point you’d need an R8 to beat it. Give a C8 a stage 2 and the R8 won’t even stay in front of it🔥
@@AYO_KO This new RS6 performance, is quicker than my old stage 1 RS6... Ive run 3.0 to 100 already on the internal measurement, and 2.9, with one foot rollout... I am looking forward to the new stage 1 tunes for this motor... itll be a monster
Guys You are so exited like You never driven a fast car...it's an old car 5years on the market with a lifting.. You say crazy interior- really ? It exists in A6 from 2018 and it's the oldest on the market ( look at bmw and Mercedes ). Don't get me wrong, it's a beautiful car with a great update with nice tuning possibilities.. But let's be honest, it's old model for crazy money ( at least in EU )
0-100 in 3.3? Yall realize a freakn m3 or m4 xdrive does it in 2.9 sec? 😂😂 yall gassing this and it cost like 60k more then those cars.. bmw is killing the game when it comes to performance. The new m5 will be insanity.. but even the m5 today will do it in 2.7
"yall" realise they have tested an M3... you are quoting times with 1ft rollout to 60mph... The M3/4 did 3.6-3.7 seconds to 100km/h without 1ft rollout in Australia by this publication.... Comparing like for like, watch Carwows comparison of the RS6 performance vs M5 competition... the RS6 runs 11.1s consistently, where as the M5 comp runs 11.1-11.4, depending on the launch... M3/4 are running closer to 11.5 seconds on average. I dont think the reviewers are just gassing over Audi products... This car is genuinely faster than an M3 in a straight line though...
@@carguy8270 u have absolutely no idea what ur talking about.. there have been dozens of reviews of the m3 and m4 xdrive achieving 2.9 sec 0-60.. go watch joe Achilles review.. bmw always understates their cars performance numbers on paper. Car and driver got it at 2.8 sec . Sam carlegion has shown the m3 and m4 xdrive too do the quarter mile in 11 sec flat.. wow dude u really have 0 clue what ur talking about or ur just confusing the RWD versions with the XDrive ones.
@@G82Watts Dude, there are races between the normal RS6 and the M3 - they are basically identical in speed... The m3/4 is slower than the M5 comp, which is basically the exact same as the Rs6 perf/RS7 perf. Joe achilles himself says the RS6 performance is a few tenths quicker than the M3/4 when he tests it... ruclips.net/video/w0OPOSf1wlE/видео.html - theres carwow, and here is Joe achilles... ruclips.net/video/OtwEDWAywSE/видео.html go to - go to 14,30 mins in to hear him to talk how it compares to the m3... also watch this, the RS6 is dropping the m5 comp 2/3 times, and the m5 comp absolutely smokes the m3 mate ruclips.net/video/Zw_blErImso/видео.html ... Also there is no point quoting an m3 from car legion, hes running with rollout... its no different to the autotopnl doing 1ft rollout runs with the RS7 at 2.7 seconds... This is a better comparison like for like vs a rwd m3 - 11.3-11.5 is the norm ruclips.net/video/fW_7uoJcMa4/видео.html By the way I am an owner of an M3 CS, M5 CS, cayenne Turbo GT and now an RS6 performance... I have tested all of them 100-200
THANK YOU WIPERTECH!!
Use code “CARSAUCE15” at checkout for 15% off your order and free express shipping! Link here for WiperTech:
bit.ly/3PG6kxj
Audi kicked some asses with this performance upgrades
I have never understood why cheap car manufacturers can't make cars that look good as Audi's, Range rovers, BMW's, Merc's etc ..? why is it only super expensive cars look great ? looks are not expensive right ? its just looks, so why can't cheap cars look as good as expensive ones ?
Those looks plus the extremely good aerodynamics cost a lot more than the average car to develop. Plus there's more complex body panel pressings.
The new amg gt series and amg glc series both look amazing but otherwise I agree
Because it’s expensive to develop???
Some new bmw and Mercedes don’t look that good imo. Toyota, Kia and Honda have actually made some pretty nice looking cars I think. There’s also the higher performance/prestige of those expensive cars that make it look nicer. Huge brakes, exhausts, wide tires, advanced headlights etc
It’s a good question. Do check out Peter Schreyer though. I’d argue that he brought brands like Kia and Hyundai into the mainstream
Audi just gets better
Beautiful piece of pure German Engineering! 🇩🇪🥰🇩🇪🥰
Calling for "MUMMY!!" at 13:46 hilarious!! Awesome car, awesome review. Long live ICE performance cars.
The sound that you guys are hearing behind you is coming from the cooling fans built into the seats! I have a 2023 Q8.
would love to see the Audi rs3 reviewed. RS7 is such a beast!
Would love to see a few reviews with Jacob driving and Matt as passenger 😄
Too perfect and that's great. Everything comes together perfectly. No pretense and plagiarism!
Congrats on 100k boys! Well deserved! Keep it up, Daddy Matt and Jacob ❤
Not gonna lie, for as long as I've been watching you guys, the whole time I thought the name of the sponsor was "Daddy Wipertech" not just Wipertech
loving the fun energy bros
Great review on a Beast of a car..and what a stunning looking car 👌🔥🔥🔥💯💯
A hatchback that takes the form of a sedan.
I think that defines it as a lift-back.
Great review with emotion 👍🏽
Planning to get the Audi rsq8 next month
I have a stage 3 rs7 and ttrs
Imagine how crazy the launch is with 500Hp more 😮
Brakes are 440mm Carbon brakes with 10 piston calipers
U havent been in the ETRON RS GT? THATS A 3 SEC FLAT! Test that and I know it'll change ur mind. I have and I frigent loved it!
E-tron Can’t beat a RS6/7 at the end of the day.
It isn’t anything to give an RS7 a stage one software remap. At that point you’d need an R8 to beat it. Give a C8 a stage 2 and the R8 won’t even stay in front of it🔥
@@AYO_KOJust 19L /100km just!
@@AYO_KO This new RS6 performance, is quicker than my old stage 1 RS6... Ive run 3.0 to 100 already on the internal measurement, and 2.9, with one foot rollout... I am looking forward to the new stage 1 tunes for this motor... itll be a monster
They did, but if you look, they tested it on damp road, and it got 3.8 seconds... so this car still was the quickest thing theyve tested.
The c/f is real, looks particularly snazzy with the optional blue weave
The rims are so sick
I would prefer the RS6, which would be my dream daily.
It's a pity you weren't given the RS6 to review!
Great review
They should add the torque rear mode on this car like they did with the rs3.
This has gotta be the most times I’ve heard ‘duck 🦆 with an f’ in 3.3 seconds! 🤣 Is Audi also the OG for dynamic indicators or did I imagine that?
Why vauxhall did do it commodore or Holden vxr carry on
This car is sick. I love it.
you guys are crazy
😂😂😂9:05 fist 👊🏾
Awesome fabulous sound Amazing Wonderfull nice car 🎉🎉🎉❤❤❤👍👍👍😱😱😱🔥🔥🔥💯💯💯💪💪💪💪💪
❤❤ Love 🚗
Yes
Just yes 😂
try a G80 M4 comp xdrive. 0-60 2.8.
lol they did, without 1ft rollout its like 3.65 seconds in Australia... its nowhere near as fast as the rs6 performance mate
Bmgay dickrider 😂, stop capping. GT 63SE 2.6
Dream Car!!
Them pickles on fire
It roar like male lion, great car
great car shame about the luxury car tax lol
Car throttle from wish, jk guys keep on goin!
I prefer the RS5 Sportback or the older BMW M5 CS
What the hell is a kaar?
It's not a hatchback, it's a fastback. Just like a Kia Stinger.
You guys are too rude to the RS7, what a waste and not cherish the moment with RS7😢
A liftback is just a type of hatchback.
180k 😅 🤪 nothing is worth the $ anymore but forget that a brand new tiny Mazda Miata is 50k double what it was not even 6 yrs ago. insane
This car is 😗👌
Hey broh can you help to get It
DREAM CAR FOR ME too bad i will never own it :D
Like hear V8 like Aston Martin
Cool
Like to c RS4 convertable
See Matt and Daddy Jacob bouncing up and down you say?
luka doncic looking bloke
A Sportback.
Only if I had some bitcoin 😊
Knightrider
Guys You are so exited like You never driven a fast car...it's an old car 5years on the market with a lifting.. You say crazy interior- really ? It exists in A6 from 2018 and it's the oldest on the market ( look at bmw and Mercedes ).
Don't get me wrong, it's a beautiful car with a great update with nice tuning possibilities..
But let's be honest, it's old model for crazy money ( at least in EU )
The new M-5 will destroy this car in every way!!!!!
Not that ugly bmw crap with Aliexpress design
Its so shit ! Isin t coyote 5.0
is it jsut me or are cars getting more and more ugly? I mean this one is quite ok but all the new BMWS Are hideous and most brands are no better.
No carbon fibre interior equals piece of crap. Looks like cheap Chinese plastics.
Not worth all that money. You bairly see RS7 on the road 😂
0-100 in 3.3? Yall realize a freakn m3 or m4 xdrive does it in 2.9 sec? 😂😂 yall gassing this and it cost like 60k more then those cars.. bmw is killing the game when it comes to performance. The new m5 will be insanity.. but even the m5 today will do it in 2.7
"yall" realise they have tested an M3... you are quoting times with 1ft rollout to 60mph... The M3/4 did 3.6-3.7 seconds to 100km/h without 1ft rollout in Australia by this publication.... Comparing like for like, watch Carwows comparison of the RS6 performance vs M5 competition... the RS6 runs 11.1s consistently, where as the M5 comp runs 11.1-11.4, depending on the launch... M3/4 are running closer to 11.5 seconds on average. I dont think the reviewers are just gassing over Audi products... This car is genuinely faster than an M3 in a straight line though...
@@carguy8270 u have absolutely no idea what ur talking about.. there have been dozens of reviews of the m3 and m4 xdrive achieving 2.9 sec 0-60.. go watch joe Achilles review.. bmw always understates their cars performance numbers on paper. Car and driver got it at 2.8 sec . Sam carlegion has shown the m3 and m4 xdrive too do the quarter mile in 11 sec flat.. wow dude u really have 0 clue what ur talking about or ur just confusing the RWD versions with the XDrive ones.
@@G82Watts Dude, there are races between the normal RS6 and the M3 - they are basically identical in speed... The m3/4 is slower than the M5 comp, which is basically the exact same as the Rs6 perf/RS7 perf. Joe achilles himself says the RS6 performance is a few tenths quicker than the M3/4 when he tests it... ruclips.net/video/w0OPOSf1wlE/видео.html - theres carwow, and here is Joe achilles... ruclips.net/video/OtwEDWAywSE/видео.html go to - go to 14,30 mins in to hear him to talk how it compares to the m3... also watch this, the RS6 is dropping the m5 comp 2/3 times, and the m5 comp absolutely smokes the m3 mate ruclips.net/video/Zw_blErImso/видео.html ... Also there is no point quoting an m3 from car legion, hes running with rollout... its no different to the autotopnl doing 1ft rollout runs with the RS7 at 2.7 seconds... This is a better comparison like for like vs a rwd m3 - 11.3-11.5 is the norm ruclips.net/video/fW_7uoJcMa4/видео.html
By the way I am an owner of an M3 CS, M5 CS, cayenne Turbo GT and now an RS6 performance... I have tested all of them 100-200
My 2015 tesla p85d is quicker and cost 86k
Lmfao. We're talking about LUXURY sports cars. Not ugly outdated cars that turn no heads. Also no it wouldn't.
@@G82Watts haha, too easy
Your piece of refurbished granny pants Tesla is unfortunately much slower also.