Was gonna say it’s one of the best films I’ve seen this year but that wouldn’t be much of a compliment given how shit cinema has been in 2024. It’s very, very good. I thought the gimmick would wear off but it had such intense vibes it worked.
You should review movies for a job lol honesty gotta respect that. It was a surprise to me I liked it as much as I did. I usually hate everything 😜 just kidding kinds
I DID see The Beach House! It's been years so I'm barely remembering it but I do remember being entertained. Howabout "Anything for Jackson"? Have you seen that Shudder Original? I'd say I loved that as much as In a Violent Nature!
@@MustacheManMedia Hi! I haven't seen "Anything for Jackson" but will give it a look based on your recommendation. I'm 57, grew up watching this stuff like you and Geoff, mostly when they first hit theaters. My dad, RIP, took me to see "Halloween", "Alien" and "The Shining" all during their initial runs. Finally, at agde 15 in 82 I finally figured out a way to sneak into them at the local mom and pop theater that showed them. "Beach House" had great atmosphere with that mysterious fog that settled in, trapping them. Really enjoy your bracket videos but would also love to see more single title segments like this one. Thanks.
@@creepshow314that’s great you guys liked it! It totally felt like one of those stories from Heavy Metal magazine. Pedro Pascal’s performance, especially in that arm cutting off scene, was top notch!
@@MustacheManMedia I suppose my issue isn't with the narrative/backstory not being *interesting* enough, but the silent killer POV format. I think formatting the movie from the perspective of the silent killer really boxes the director in as to how they are able to deliver information to the audience, it's not so much that the narrative wasn't compelling- just that overhearing the plot/backstory in the form of 3rd person exposition dumps made that information just seem that much less important. Which, in fairness, the plot comes off as secondary in most slashers anyways. Someone who knows more about film is probably pulling their hair out over my comment saying "THAT'S THE POINT THEY ARE MAKING, IS THAT THE PLOT IS IRRELEVANT TO THE ESSENCE OF A SLASHER". And I was thinking horror in general, but *specifically* for slashers I wouldn't hesitate to say this is one of the best I've seen.
Great response! And yeah, you sum it up really well and I venture to guess that this was the filmmakers intention. The teenagers and incidental's backstories and general feelings are of little importance in normal slasher films so I'm assuming that instead of insulting the viewer's intelligence with this trivial BS he left the exposition and banter as nothing but background noise. You are right that the director boxed himself in with this approach but I think we both agree that he pulled it off wonderfully.
Also, I have to add, in the video I mention seeing Terrifier 2. I was wrong. It was the first Terrifier. I'm actually half way through Terrifier 2 right now. I'll probably check out 3 at some point. You are not the only person saying it's not bad.
BROOOOOO!!!!!
DUUUUUUDE!!!!!
@@MustacheManMedia BROOOOOD!!!!
Was gonna say it’s one of the best films I’ve seen this year but that wouldn’t be much of a compliment given how shit cinema has been in 2024. It’s very, very good. I thought the gimmick would wear off but it had such intense vibes it worked.
It’s ok, you can still say it.
Agreed on all points.
You should review movies for a job lol honesty gotta respect that. It was a surprise to me I liked it as much as I did. I usually hate everything 😜 just kidding kinds
Yes, you may suggest 🙏
Or Hey Check This Out! Or Under the Radar! Or Hey Watch This!
Not a fan of Shudder Originals, but this one was a great surprise. Would also recommend The Beach House, which was also a surprisingly good one.
I DID see The Beach House! It's been years so I'm barely remembering it but I do remember being entertained. Howabout "Anything for Jackson"? Have you seen that Shudder Original? I'd say I loved that as much as In a Violent Nature!
@@MustacheManMedia Hi! I haven't seen "Anything for Jackson" but will give it a look based on your recommendation. I'm 57, grew up watching this stuff like you and Geoff, mostly when they first hit theaters. My dad, RIP, took me to see "Halloween", "Alien" and "The Shining" all during their initial runs. Finally, at agde 15 in 82 I finally figured out a way to sneak into them at the local mom and pop theater that showed them. "Beach House" had great atmosphere with that mysterious fog that settled in, trapping them. Really enjoy your bracket videos but would also love to see more single title segments like this one. Thanks.
Surprisingly, I really enjoyed it! The scene where the girl cuts his arm off was pretty intense! I almost passed out!
Me too! The way he was preparing himself for it contrasted to how ‘matter of fact’ she was when cutting it off was a little off putting…
@@creepshow314hopefully not off putting enough to make you not finish it!
@@movieshits679oh no, it was just a really well done scene showing a major life altering event being handled in a nonchalant manner. Very well done.
@@creepshow314that’s great you guys liked it! It totally felt like one of those stories from Heavy Metal magazine. Pedro Pascal’s performance, especially in that arm cutting off scene, was top notch!
@@JeffAllenECKS great recommendation! Too bad you ran out of time and F words.
It's an extremely well composed film, but I think without a more compelling narrative it isn't up there with the greats.
Is there something you feel would have helped the narrative? And when you say "greats" are you thinking slasher films or horror in general?
@@MustacheManMedia I suppose my issue isn't with the narrative/backstory not being *interesting* enough, but the silent killer POV format.
I think formatting the movie from the perspective of the silent killer really boxes the director in as to how they are able to deliver information to the audience, it's not so much that the narrative wasn't compelling- just that overhearing the plot/backstory in the form of 3rd person exposition dumps made that information just seem that much less important. Which, in fairness, the plot comes off as secondary in most slashers anyways.
Someone who knows more about film is probably pulling their hair out over my comment saying "THAT'S THE POINT THEY ARE MAKING, IS THAT THE PLOT IS IRRELEVANT TO THE ESSENCE OF A SLASHER".
And I was thinking horror in general, but *specifically* for slashers I wouldn't hesitate to say this is one of the best I've seen.
Great response! And yeah, you sum it up really well and I venture to guess that this was the filmmakers intention. The teenagers and incidental's backstories and general feelings are of little importance in normal slasher films so I'm assuming that instead of insulting the viewer's intelligence with this trivial BS he left the exposition and banter as nothing but background noise. You are right that the director boxed himself in with this approach but I think we both agree that he pulled it off wonderfully.
Better than Terrifier 3 (which didn't suck). It gives me hope that indy filmmakers will continue to overtake Hollywood.
You are right! I think indie films will be the saviors of new horror films. I really like the risks that studios like A24 take.
Also, I have to add, in the video I mention seeing Terrifier 2. I was wrong. It was the first Terrifier. I'm actually half way through Terrifier 2 right now. I'll probably check out 3 at some point. You are not the only person saying it's not bad.